fy 1997 annual report - iowa state university · web viewiowa state university department of...

Iowa State University

DEPARTMENT OF RESIDENCEAND ISU DINING ANNUAL REPORT FY14

Prepared September 2014

Submitted by:

Dr. Peter EnglinDirector of Residence

and

Nancy KellerDirector of ISU Dining

Iowa State University

DEPARTMENT OF RESIDENCEANDISU DININGANNUAL REPORT FY14

Table of Contents Page 1

Executive Summary Pages 2-5

Enrollment and Occupancy Page 6

Explanation For Variance In Design, Offered And Program Capacities Page 7

Capacity and Occupancy Page 8

Room and Board Rates Page 9

Peer Group Comparison Page 9

System Distribution of Rooms and Rates Page 10

Room Style Demand Page 11

Meal Plan Buy-In Page 12

Financial Data Page 13

Bond Principal and Interest Due Page 14

Facilities Summary Page 14

Appendix A – Explanation of Changes to Design Capacity Page 15

Appendix B – Explanation of Off-Line Spaces Page 15

Iowa State University Department of Residence and ISU Dining Annual Report FY14 Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Department of Residence (DOR)The DOR has grown occupancy by 54.7% (from 7,909 to 12,237) since 2005 by serving as the premier living environment for student success. Strategic and continuous improvements aimed at enhancing the academic success of our residents at Iowa State University sustain an outstanding student experience.

This growth has resulted in demand for university-owned/managed housing that exceeds permanent capacity (see page eight), despite the addition of 780 newly constructed beds in Frederiksen Court being brought on line between fall 2013 – fall 2014. For fall 2013, permanent capacity was exceeded by 815 spaces. This shortfall increased to 1,282 spaces for fall 2014. As a result, for fall 2014 the need to use common area dens as interim housing continued for a fourth consecutive year. Also for fall 2014, 1,059 additional spaces have been leased in the off-campus community and are being staffed, assigned, and contracted by the DOR as university-managed housing – a practice that began in fall 2013.

DOR’s focus continues to be providing added value to the student experience for those who live on-campus. MAP-Works, a freshmen focused, web-based, self-assessment program is in its seventh year of use and is implemented the third week of each fall semester. This is the optimal time for this survey, as it is the point at which students are realizing the differences between their expectations coming in and the realities of being a new freshman. During year one of administration, about 70% of the freshman class participated in MAP-Works. During this past year (2013), the percentage was 84.4%. The MAP-Works results provide students and staff with a comprehensive snapshot of how each individual student is experiencing Iowa State University shortly after starting classes. Currently, the DOR funds over 95% of this $90,000 initiative and partners with staff in the Dean of Students Office, Athletics, and faculty and staff in the Colleges of Human Sciences, Liberal Arts & Sciences, Engineering, Business, Agriculture & Life Sciences, and Design in sharing/using the student data derived from the MAP-Works assessment. Students who have participated in MAP-Works since 2008 have had substantially higher 1-year retention rates (88.0%) than students who have not (79.2%). These percentages include accounting for differences in entering characteristics such as high school rank, high school grade point average, and ACT composite score. MAP-Works respondents also have higher first semester grade point averages (GPAs): 2.81 vs. 2.42.

The DOR assessment and research staff continuously conducts independent analyses that note additional positive outcomes from living on-campus. In fall 2013, students living on-campus recorded significantly higher GPAs than their off-campus peers. On-campus freshmen achieved a grade point average of 2.75 as compared to 2.35 for their off-campus counterparts; sophomores achieved a 2.90 vs. 2.70; juniors a 3.02 vs. 2.85, and seniors a 3.14 vs. 3.05. It is especially telling for first-year, first-time freshmen, as students in their first semester at ISU who achieved a 2.00 or better have a 6-year graduation rate of 81% vs. 38% rates for freshmen who did not achieve a 2.00 GPA their first semester. Moreover, the 6-year graduation rate was higher for students living on-campus their first year (71.5%) than students living off-campus their first year (63.4%) accounting for differences in entering characteristics such as high school rank, high school grade point average, and ACT composite score.

Disaggregating National Survey for Student Engagement (NSSE) and National College Health Assessment data also provides good information regarding on-campus life. On-campus students were more likely to have:

already participated in a learning community; worked on a research project with a faculty member outside of course or program requirements; planned to do a culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project, or thesis); had serious conversations with students who are very different in terms of religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values; engaged in lower rates of high risk drinking in residence halls (31%) and on-campus apartment (38%) as opposed to the ISU

average rates of 42% and off-campus apartment rate of 51%. attended an art exhibit, play, dance, music, theater, or other performance; felt the institution does a good job of providing the support to help them succeed academically; felt the institution emphasizes encouraging contact among students from different backgrounds; felt the institution encouraged attendance at campus events and activities; felt the institution provided the support they needed to thrive socially; and evaluated their educational experience more positively.

While the demand for on-campus housing has been robust, the Ames’ community rental housing landscape is changing significantly. Four national, private student housing developers are either completing projects or securing approvals to provide off-campus housing specifically designated to serve Iowa State University students. Combined, the potential exists for an additional 1,800 beds to be available by fall 2015. Forecasting occupancy will be much more challenging as students evaluate choices and relative value.

ISU DiningEnrollment has had a significant impact on ISU Dining operations. ISU Dining continues to increase the number of students participating in the meal plan each year. In fall 2014, 839 more students are on meal plans. Meal transactions have increased for a second year by more than 1,000 transactions daily in Residential and Retail operations. This creates space issues during peak traffic times and leads to an increase in repairs and maintenance. ISU Dining is attempting to address the increase traffic issues by:

providing longer service times,


providing a Food Tent Grill at UDCC, improving communication through posters and table tents that explain wait times and off-peak times, providing continuous service at Union Drive Marketplace and Conversations dining centers, the addition of ABE’s Harvest Café.

In addition to these efforts by ISU Dining, ISU Purchasing has contracted with five food trucks, which are strategically placed around campus.

Even with these options in place, the hours of 11:00 am – 1:00 pm continue to see high traffic when classes break. Additionally, once the weather turns cold and students are unwilling to make food purchases outside, the food tent program at UDM and the campus food trucks will no longer be as viable. ISU Dining continues to explore options to address this increased demand and looks forward to the approval of a proposed expansion called the Friley Windows Project which would add three – four service venues and 300 seats for student during the lunch crunch.

During 2013 -14, ISU Dining continued to review and update base business operations and compared that to student feedback. While every effort is being made to meet student needs, it is anticipated that voluntary meal plans will decrease within the next year if student wants are not addressed. Students continue to request more services, longer hours, and more flexibility to the meal plan. In an effort to better serve students, ISU Dining will continue to work with students to define healthy meal options and increase meal plan value. ISU Dining assists students through the ISU Dining Student Board to understand the difference between NEEDS and WANTS when it comes to fiscal responsibility and keeping the cost of attendance low.

Through the signing of a contract with Martin Brothers as in July 2014, ISU Dining is looking at reducing operating expense and food cost by $400,000. All three Regent institutions now have the same food service supplier which is in line with the desire to gain efficiencies by utilizing our purchasing power as Regent institutions.

Strategic and continuous improvement in facilities and service has been an emphasis for ISU Dining over the past few years. In the last three years there has been a substantial shift in students choosing to dine in retail areas as opposed to all-you-care-to-eat residential operations. As a result, revenue has shifted accordingly and the students have gained flexibility and portability options.

CateringISU Dining Catering has been focusing on customer satisfaction and the culinary team is still working through the absence of a Chef de Cuisine for Catering. After two failed searches, JDR Quest search firm has been hired to help the process move forward. ISU Dining has rolled out Net Catering - an on-line system designed to streamline staff administrative workflow and make it more convenient for customers to book events.

Residential DiningISU Dining has enjoyed record FY15 meal plan participation with 11,245 total meal plans purchased, an 8.1% increase. This includes:

4,913 voluntary meal plans – an increase of 874 (21.6%), and 6,332 mandatory meal plans – a decrease of 35 (-5.5%).

The decrease in mandatory meal plans can be attributed to fluctuations in the numbers and assignments of students who cancel their housing contracts between move-in and Count Day each year.

Wellness continues to be an important issue for students and the University. ISU Dining’s registered dietitian in collaboration with the Health Center and Recreation Services has improved ISU Dining’s Wellness Education Program and Allergens Service for students on meal plans. ISU Dining continues to adapt menus to offer increased vegetarian, vegan, gluten-free, halal and kosher options in Dining Centers. Students can identify these items and plan their meals using the on-line NetNutrition program as well as nutrition information cards available at the point of service. ISU Dining continues to offer other healthy alternatives such as Crystal Light, frozen yogurt, and sauces “on the side” of proteins. An addition of helpful marketing signs, which make suggestions on ways to make better choices, is having a positive impact on the consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables. The Dietitian has also been collaborating with the Dietetics program at Iowa State University to have interns support the ISU Dining Program and receive great hands on experience educating their peers. She has also supported the reduction of portion sizes to meet dietary guidelines in our all-you-care-to-eat programs and some retail items.

ISU Dining will continue to work with the growing international population on-campus to meet their cultural and religious dietary needs.

ISU Dining is also working in coordination with Athletics to meet the late night needs of ISU Athletes.

Retail OperationsRetail continues to be a strong growth area and students continue to request longer hours. Retail operations offer a more economical way for ISU Dining to meet student needs for late night service. Retail operations typically have less waste and increased portability, which is a benefit for students with busy schedules.


The meal bundle program continues to bring increased satisfaction, providing improved convenience, flexibility, and perceived value to meal plan holders. Meal bundles allow students to utilize a meal swipe to receive an entrée, three sides, and a beverage. This option also lessens the demands on the all-you–care-to-eat facilities during the busy lunch period. Approximately 4,240 meal bundles are served daily in the retail locations, an increase of 16.0%.

Enrollment and OccupancyDemand for on-campus housing continues to outpace enrollment growth for the fifth year in a row. From fall 2013 to fall 2014, total University enrollment increased by 1,491 students (4.5%). The breakdown is as follows:

361 student increase (2.8%) in lower division enrollment, (80 freshmen, 281 sophomores) 873 student increase (5.9%) in upper division enrollment 257 student increase (4.6%) in graduate and professional student enrollment

On-campus occupancy saw an overall increase of 967 students (8.6%), for a total of 12,237 residents. The breakdown is as follows: 425 student increase (5.2%) in lower division occupancy (11 freshmen, 414 sophomores) 457 student increase (16.2%) in upper division occupancy 85 student increase (31.8%) in graduate and professional student occupancy

Housing CapacityPrior to the start of fall 2013, on-campus capacity within permanent spaces had been maximized as much as possible by re-commissioning spaces that had been off-line or converting singles to doubles and doubles to triples wherever possible. Additionally, 240 new apartment spaces were built in Frederiksen Court. Still, the demand for housing exceeded permanent capacity. As a result, common area dens within the residence halls were once again needed as interim housing. However, this still was insufficient to accommodate the demand for housing and the decision was made to lease spaces in the off-campus community to be operated as on-campus housing for upper-division students. Ultimately, these additions were still not enough and the DOR had no choice but to stop accepting housing contracts from new transfers and returning students as of May 1, 2013. A confirmed 290 students who had already submitted contracts were turned away.

For fall 2014, completion of the Frederiksen Court construction project saw an additional 480 spaces come on-line and available for fall 2014 occupancy. However, projections for fall 2014 indicated that demand for housing would continue to substantially exceed capacity, even with the continued use of interim housing. Permission was sought and received to extend the original lease of off-campus space for an additional year as well as to lease an additional 564 spaces in West Ames.

During the Recontracting process for fall 2014, it became apparent that retention of residents to on-campus housing was increasing and DOR staff became concerned that this would result in insufficient space to accommodate newly admitted students. To combat this, the DOR informed current residents that they had to participate in the Recontracting process and select a space on-campus by March 1, 2014 in order to guarantee themselves a space on-campus. 235 returners who contracted after March 1 were put on a waitlist with no guarantee of housing. Of this group, only 26 were able to ultimately be accommodated prior to the start of fall classes.

The DOR also made programmatic changes to deal with increased occupancy and changing on-campus demographics. Specifically, once it became clear there would not be enough residence hall space to accommodate all newly admitted, first-year students, Frederiksen Court building 81, newly constructed and never before occupied, was allocated as an exclusively freshman community.

At this point, there is little to no additional space within the existing system to expand capacity. Should enrollment continue to grow, the DOR will either need to build facilities, continue to lease facilities, or alter housing philosophy.

Room Styles & RatesThe table on page 10 outlines the number of available rooms by style and rate.

Choice continues to be very important to today’s students and their families. The DOR offers a number of different room styles and options. Room rates are based upon the type of room offered. Equitable room types with the same amenities are the same rate regardless of their location on-campus.

Peer Group ComparisonsIn this era of increasing diversity in housing and dining availability on-campuses nationwide, it is difficult to draw direct conclusions based upon peer group data. Using the aggregate of data, however, ISU on-campus housing remains competitively priced when compared to the land-grant peer group. See tables on page ten.

Room DemandThe table on page 11 shows the breakdown of fall 2014 student requests for specific room types and locations. The demand figures are based only on the student’s FIRST preference for product type and area.

Residence Hall PreferencesThe top three residence hall preferences are:


Union Drive (UD) – Double Room – AC (1,199 requests, 695 spaces) Richardson Court (RC) – Double Room – Maple (1,064 requests, 440 spaces) Union Drive (UD) – Suite Double – Substance Free (844 requests, 323 spaces)

Following several years of being in the bottom three requested residence hall preferences, the DOR decided to discontinue offering a 21 and older floor in Buchanan Hall and Plus Break housing in Linden Hall. The Buchanan Hall 21 and over spaces were reallocated as standard Buchanan single and double suites. The Linden Hall Plus Break spaces were reallocated as standard Richardson Court, no AC, single, double, and triple spaces

The bottom three residence hall preferences are: Union Drive (UD) – Double Room - no AC, Sub. Free (32 requests, 31 spaces) Richardson Court (RC) – Single Room - no AC (51 requests, 43 spaces) Richardson Court (RC) – Single Room - no AC, Single Gender (67 requests, 93 spaces)

Friley Hall (2,538) remains the most popular residence hall, followed by Maple (1,265), and Eaton (844). Demand in these buildings continues to exceed capacity.

Wallace-Wilson (213) is the least popular building/area followed by single gender housing in Oak-Elm and Birch-Welch-Roberts (320). Capacity in these areas exceeds initial demand.

Requests for co-ed housing exceed requests for single-gender housing at a rate of 22 to 1.

Requests for double rooms exceed requests for single rooms at a rate of 13 to 1.

Requests for air-conditioned housing exceed requests for non-air-conditioned housing at a rate of 5 to 1.

Where both exist, requests for non-substance free housing exceed requests for substance free housing at a rate of 1.5 to 1.

Student Apartment PreferencesRequests for Frederiksen Court increased 21.6% while Schilletter-University Village (SUV) requests decreased 4.1%. In the leased apartments, requests for Legacy increased 25.0% while requests for Maricopa increased 232.0%.

Guest HousingGuest housing requests continue to rise during the spring and summer, when demand exceeds supply. Fall 2014 guest occupancy sits at 69.0%, a 14.0% increase.

Meal Plan Buy-InFall 2014 saw an 8.1% increase in overall meal plans purchased, -.5% in mandatory meal plans, and 21.6% in voluntary meal plans. The increase in voluntary meal plans purchased exceeds the goals previously set by ISU Dining to maintain 3,100 voluntary meals plans. For fall 2014, 4,913 students in Frederiksen Court, leased spaces, off-campus, SUV, and Wallace-Wilson chose to purchase a voluntary meal plan.

Financial DataNet operating revenue for FY14 is $27,333,742, an increase of $828,352 over FY13. This increase is attributable primarily to increased New Direct from High School enrollment for fall 2013, strong retention rates of continuing residents to on-campus housing, and an increase in voluntary meal plan participation.

Capital Expenditures/Replacement ValuesDOR and ISU Dining have made the strategic decision to target the majority of their capital dollars into specific facilities based upon current knowledge of future facility utilization. In-year priorities impact implementation of this strategy.


ENROLLMENT and OCCUPANCY

All data is as of Count Day (10th class day) for the fall semester of the fiscal year. Enrollment Data can be found on the ISU Web Site: http://www.iastate.edu/~registrar/stats/.

Enrollment Comparison

Level Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Change (+ or -)# %

Freshmen 6,913 6,993 80 1.2%Sophomores 5,888 6,169 281 4.8%

Total lower division 12,801 13,162 361 2.8%Total upper division 14,858 15,731 873 5.9%

Total undergraduate 1 27,659 28,893 1,234 4.5%Total graduate 2 5,582 5,839 257 4.6%Total enrollment 33,241 34,732 1,491 4.5%

Occupancy and Enrollment Comparison – Residence Halls


Freshmen 5,363 5,278 -85 -1.6%Sophomores 1,421 1,461 40 2.8%

Total lower division 6,784 6,739 -45 -0.7%Total upper division 719 703 -16 -2.2%

Total undergraduate 1 7,503 7,442 -61 -0.8%Total graduate 2 5 16 11 220.0%Total occupancy 7,508 7,458 -50 -0.7%

Occupancy and Enrollment Comparison – Student Apartments


Freshmen 394 490 96 24.4%Sophomores 1,003 1,377 374 37.3%


Total undergraduate 1 3,500 4,443 943 26.9%Total graduate 2 262 336 74 28.2%Total occupancy 3,762 4,779 1,017 27.0%

Occupancy and Enrollment Comparison – Residence Halls and Student Apartments


Freshmen 5,757 5,768 11 0.2%Sophomores 2,424 2,838 414 17.1%


Total undergraduate 1 11,003 11,885 882 8.0%Total graduate 2 267 352 85 31.8%Total occupancy 11,270 12,237 967 8.6%

Percentage of Enrollment Housed – Residence Halls and Student ApartmentsLevel Fall 2013 Fall 2014 (+ or -)Freshmen 83.3% 82.5% -0.8%Sophomores 41.2% 46.0% 4.8%

Total lower division 63.9% 65.4% 1.5%Total upper division 19.0% 20.8% 1.9%

Total undergraduate 1 39.8% 41.1% 1.4%Total graduate 2 4.8% 6.0% 1.2%Total 33.9% 35.2% 1.3%

1. Undergraduate specials (non-degree) included in upper division count.2. First Professionals and Post Docs included in graduate count.


http://www.iastate.edu/~registrar/stats/

EXPLANATION for VARIANCE in DESIGN, OFFERED and PROGRAM CAPACITY

All data is as of Count Day (10th class day) for the fall semester of the fiscal year.

FALL 2014 VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS FOR DESIGN, OFFERED AND PROGRAM CAPACITYResidence Halls Design 1 Offered Off-Line 2 Program Variance Explanation VarianceBarton 100 100 0 99 -1 1 CA DAS 3

Birch-Welch-Roberts 489 489 0 478 -11 11 CA DASFreeman 117 117 0 117 0Larch 544 544 0 536 -8 8 CA DASLinden 320 320 0 313 -7 7 CA DASLyon 119 119 0 119 0Maple 496 496 0 488 -8 8 CA DASOak-Elm 443 443 0 439 -4 4 CA DASWillow 544 544 0 536 -8 8 CA DASTotal Richardson Court 3,172 3,172 0 3,125 -47Eaton 328 326 -2 323 -3 3 CA DASFriley 1,212 1,210 -2 1,191 -19 19 CA DASHelser 713 713 0 700 -13 13 CA DASMartin 332 331 -1 331 0

Total Union Drive 2,585 2,580 -5 2,545 -35

Buchanan 409 409 0 409 0

Wallace 4 546 546 0 546 0

Wilson 545 544 -1 544 0

Total Towers 1,500 1,499 -1 1,499 0

Total Residence Halls 7,257 7,251 -6 7,169 -82

Student Apartments Design 1 Offered Off-Line 2 Program Variance Explanation VarianceFrederiksen Court 2,712 2,682 -30 2,682 0Schilletter Village – Single 0 0 0 52 52 54 SV spaces (27 units) rented as non-family, 2 privateUniversity Village – Single 992 985 -7 890 -95 18 UV spaces (9 units) rented as family, 77 privateTotal Single Student 3,704 3,667 -37 3,624 -43Schilletter Village - Family 4 180 180 0 153 -27 27 SV units (54 spaces) rented as non-familyUniversity Village - Family 4 0 0 0 9 9 9 UV units (18 spaces) rented as familyTotal Family 180 180 0 162 -18

Total Student Apartments 3,884 3,847 -37 3,786 -61

Total System Design 1 Offered Off-Line 2 Program Variance Explanation of VarianceTotal Student Bed Spaces 11,141 11,098 -43 10,955 -143Total Interim Spaces 5 436 436 0 436 0Total Leased Spaces 6 1,067 1,059 -8 1,059 0Total Guest Apartments 5 76 71 -5 71 0Total DOR System 12,720 12,664 -56 12,521 -143

1. See Appendix A for an explanation of changes to Design Capacity2. See Appendix B for an explanation of Off-line Space3. DAS indicates that a double room is being used as a single, either as a CA space or for a student with a medical need4. All SUV Family and Guest are designed with 2 bed spaces, but are offered as single units (1 bed space).5. Interim housing spaces (converted den spaces) are only brought on-line as needed.6. Space leased in off-campus community to meet increased demand for on-campus housing.


CAPACITY and OCCUPANCY

All data is as of Count Day (10th class day) for the fall semester of the fiscal year. Capacity indicated is PROGRAM capacity. Program capacity will vary from year to year based upon on-line status and bed space

conversion due to doubles-as-singles and/or triples-as-doubles.

HALL AND APARTMENT OCCUPANCIES AS COMPARED TO PROGRAM CAPACITY

Residence HallsFall 2013 Fall 2014 Variance

Cap. Occ. % Cap. Occ. % Cap. # Cap. % Occ. # Occ. % %Barton 99 98 99.0% 99 98 99.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0%Birch-Welch-Roberts 478 473 99.0% 478 472 98.7% 0 0.0% -1 -0.2% -0.2%Freeman 117 116 99.1% 117 115 98.3% 0 0.0% -1 -0.9% -0.9%Larch 536 531 99.1% 536 530 98.9% 0 0.0% -1 -0.2% -0.2%Linden 313 308 98.4% 313 309 98.7% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0.3%Lyon 119 119 100.0% 119 114 95.8% 0 0.0% -5 -4.2% -4.2%Maple 488 486 99.6% 488 484 99.2% 0 0.0% -2 -0.4% -0.4%Oak-Elm 439 435 99.1% 439 435 99.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0%Willow 536 533 99.4% 536 524 97.8% 0 0.0% -9 -1.7% -1.7%Total Richardson Court 3,125 3,099 99.2% 3,125 3,081 98.6% 0 0.0% -18 -0.6% -0.6%Eaton 322 322 100.0% 323 319 98.8% 1 0.3% -3 -0.9% -1.2%Friley 1,190 1,183 99.4% 1,191 1,178 98.9% 1 0.1% -5 -0.4% -0.5%Helser 700 696 99.4% 700 696 99.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0%Martin 329 327 99.4% 331 326 98.5% 2 0.6% -1 -0.3% -0.9%Total Union Drive 2,541 2,528 99.5% 2,545 2,519 99.0% 4 0.2% -9 -0.4% -0.5%Buchanan 406 398 98.0% 409 403 98.5% 3 0.7% 5 1.3% 0.5%Wallace 545 531 97.4% 546 526 96.3% 1 0.2% -5 -0.9% -1.1%Wilson 544 535 98.3% 544 528 97.1% 0 0.0% -7 -1.3% -1.3%Total Towers 1,495 1,464 97.9% 1,499 1,457 97.2% 4 0.3% -7 -0.5% -0.7%Total Residence Halls 7,161 7,091 99.0% 7,169 7,057 98.4% 8 0.1% -34 -0.5% -0.6%

ApartmentsFall 2013 Fall 2014 Variance

Cap. Occ. % Cap. Occ. % Cap. # Cap. % Occ. # Occ. % %Frederiksen Court 2,193 2,176 99.2% 2,682 2,644 98.6% 489 22.3% 468 21.5% -0.6%Schilletter Village 74 72 97.3% 52 52 100.0% -22 -29.7% -20 -27.8% 2.7%University Village 885 882 99.7% 890 884 99.3% 5 0.6% 2 0.2% -0.3%Total Single Student 3,152 3,130 99.3% 3,624 3,580 98.8% 472 15.0% 450 14.4% -0.5%Schilletter Village 140 136 97.1% 153 150 98.0% 13 9.3% 14 10.3% 0.9%University Village 2 2 100.0% 9 9 100.0% 7 350.0% 7 350.0% 0.0%Total Family 142 138 97.2% 162 159 98.1% 20 14.1% 21 15.2% 1.0%Total Apartments 3,294 3,268 99.2% 3,786 3,739 98.8% 492 14.9% 471 14.4% -0.5%

DOR SystemFall 2013 Fall 2014 Variance

Cap. Occ. % Cap. Occ. % Cap. # Cap. % Occ. # Occ. % Cap.Total Permanent Capacity 10,455 10,359 99.1% 10,955 10,796 98.5% 500 4.8% 437 4.2% -0.5%Total Interim Spaces 436 417 95.6% 436 401 92.0% 0 0.0% -16 -3.8% -3.7%Total Leased Space 500 494 98.8% 1,059 1,040 98.2% 559 111.8% 546 110.5% -0.6%Total Student Spaces 11,391 11,270 98.9% 12,450 12,237 98.3% 1,059 9.3% 967 8.6% -0.6%Total Guest Apartments 72 43 59.7% 71 49 69.0% -1 -1.4% 6 14.0% 9.3%Total DOR System 11,463 11,313 98.7% 12,521 12,286 98.1% 1,058 9.2% 973 8.6% -0.6%

Permanent Capacity vs. Total Occupancy

Fall 2013 Fall 2014 VarianceCap. Occ. % Occ. Cap. +/- Cap. Occ. % Occ. Cap. +/- % Occ. Cap. +/-

10,455 11,270 107.8% (815) 10,955 12,237 111.7% (1,282) 3.9% (467)


ROOM and BOARD RATES

Rates indicated are for the entire academic year – both fall and spring semester. All data is as of Count Day (10th class day) for the fall semester of the fiscal year.

10 Year Comparison Combined Rate for Double Room and Full BoardYear Standard Double w/ A/C Full Board Combined Cost2014-2015 $4,208 $3,676 $7,8842013-2014 $4,146 $3,628 $7,7742012-2013 $4,146 $3,628 $7,7742011-2012 1 2 $4,053 $3,628 $7,6812010-2011 $3,929 $3,591 $7,5202009-2010 $3,796 $3,527 $7,3232008-2009 $3,703 $3,297 $7,0002007-2008 3 $3,561 $3,154 $6,7152006-2007 $3,360 $3,018 $6,3782005-2006 $3,231 $2,902 $6,133

1. In 2011-2012, DOR equalized rates between areas. There is no longer a cost difference between standard double rooms with AC in Union Drive and Richardson Court.2. In 2011-2012, with the formation of new meal plans, ISU Dining will begin reporting the "Gold Plan" rate. Previously, the rate used was "Weekly 17 plus DD$."3. In 2007-2008, to match the rates reported as Cost of Attendance by Financial Aid, DOR began reporting the "Union Drive - A/C" rate. Previously, the rate used was for

"Richardson Court - No-A/C.”

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS

Rates indicated are for the entire academic year – both fall and spring semester. All ISU data is as of Count Day (10th class day) for the fall semester of the fiscal year. Data for other schools has been obtained from that

university’s web site. Room Types and Meal Plans offered vary greatly by institution and may fluctuate from year to year. Room and meal plans that most

closely approximate a Standard, Union Drive, Double with A/C and the default Gold Meal Plan have been selected. In cases where ranges are present, rates are based upon buildings, locations and amenities.

Comparable Peer University Rate Comparison – Combined Rate for Double Room and Full BoardSchool 2013-2014 2014-2015 Room Board Plan Name Meals / Week $ / SemesterUniversity of California, Davis 1 $13,510 $13,766 $13,766 incl. in room Frequent Diner Plan 14 (avg.) $200 Aggie CashUniversity of Illinois, Urbana 2 $10,312 $10,518 $10,518 incl. in room 12 Classic Plan 12 15 CreditsOhio State University $10,090 - $11, 750 $10,890 $6,560 $4,330 Weekly Block 25 25 150Texas A & M University $7,484 $9,686 $5,916 $3,770 Old Army 12-Oct $300 Dining DollarsMichigan State University $9,406 $9,754 $9,754 incl. in room Platinum Unlimited $300 Spartan CashUniversity of Minnesota, Twin Cities $8,512 $8,820 $4,920 $3,900 14 Meals 14 250 Flex DineNorth Carolina State University $8,460 $8,460 $5,710 $2,750 12 Per Week 12 $300 Dining DollarsPurdue University $7,646 - $14,206 $8,184 $8,184 incl. in room 13 meal track 13 $225 Dining $Iowa State University $7,774 $7,884 $4,208 $3,676 Gold Plan 14 (avg.) $200 Dining $University of Wisconsin, Madison $8,487 - $9,237 $7,266 $5,546 Not required, but mandatory dining operation fee included in room rate.University of Arizona $5,560 - $7720 $5670 - $7870 $5670 - $7870 - No requirement n/a n/a

Comparable Peer University Rate Comparison – Standard Suites Comparable Peer University Rate Comparison – Furnished ApartmentsSchool 2013-2014 2014-2015 School 2013-2014 2014-2015Purdue University $3,980 - $6,516 $9,482 - $9,732 University of California, Davis 1 $8,908 - $10,417 $9,116 - $14,896University of Wisconsin, Madison $9,077 - $9,437 $9,359 - $9,696 North Carolina State University $7,112 $8,160Texas A & M University $3,064 - $7,000 $7,210 University of Wisconsin, Madison Rates not published $7,641University of Arizona $7,720 $7,870 University of Illinois, Urbana 2 $6,930 - $7,830 $7,020Ohio State University $5,840 - $7,500 $6,130 - $7,876 Ohio State University $6,250 - $7,500 $6,560 - $7,876Iowa State University $5,298 - $5,675 $5,337 - $5,760 University of Minnesota, Twin Cities $6,044 - $7,790 $6,282 - $8,103University of Minnesota, Twin Cities $5,056 - $5,482 $5,258 - $5,702 University of Arizona 3 $5,310 - $5,760 $6,165University of Illinois, Urbana 2 $6,870 $11,382 Michigan State University $5,920 - $7,704 $6,048 - $7,704Michigan State University n/a n/a Iowa State University $5,257 $5,336North Carolina State University n/a n/a Texas A & M University $5,146 - $6,064 $5,193 - $5,841University of California, Davis 1 n/a n/a Purdue University $4,846 - $6,734 $4,846 - 6,734

1. Housing is not university owned.2. Learning Community housing is an additional fee 3. Apartments available for graduate students only.4.


SYSTEM DISTRIBUTION of ROOMS and RATES

The number of bed spaces listed is indicative of what was OFFERED to students as available and on-line. Actual beds rented may vary due to off-line status or offering of space as double-as-single or triple-as-double (see page eight).

Rooms and Rates, System DistributionResidence Halls Fall 2013 Fall 2014Area Room Type Beds % System Rate Beds % System RateRC Single - Linden - Plus Break 1 5 0.04% $5,609 - - -RC Double - Linden - Plus Break 1 292 2.52% $4,381 - - -RC Triple - Linden - Plus Break 1 23 0.20% $4,176 - - -RC Quad - Linden - Plus Break 1 0 0.00% $3,972 - - -RC Double - Maple 448 3.86% $4,683 448 3.54% $4,753RC & UD Single without A/C 167 1.44% $5,321 172 1.36% $5,401UD Single with A/C 71 0.61% $5,426 73 0.58% $5,507RC & UD Double without A/C 1,908 16.44% $4,093 2,202 17.39% $4,154RC & UD Double with A/C 1,967 16.95% $4,146 1,966 15.52% $4,208RC & UD Triple without A/C 84 0.72% $3,923 105 0.83% $3,946UD Triple with A/C 69 0.59% $3,923 69 0.54% $3,982RC & UD Quad with A/C 0 0.00% $3,710 0 0.00% $3,766RC & UD Quad without A/C 12 0.10% $3,684 12 0.09% $3,739Total Richardson Court and Union Drive 5,046 43.47% - 5,047 39.85% -WW Single 59 0.51% $4,965 60 0.47% $5,039WW Double 1,030 8.87% $3,915 1,030 8.13% $3,974WW Quad 0 0.00% $3,500 0 0.00% $3,553Total Wallace and Wilson 1,089 9.38% - 1,090 8.61% -Total Traditional Style 6,135 52.86% - 6,137 48.46% -Area Room Type Beds % System Rate Beds % System RateRC Triple – Maple 48 0.41% $4,899 48 0.38% $4,972Total Richardson Court 48 0.41% - 48 0.38% -BH Single – Buchanan 133 1.15% $6,093 157 1.24% $6,184BH Single – Buchanan 21 or older 2 24 0.21% $6,093 - - -BH Double – Buchanan 201 1.73% $5,298 252 1.99% $5,377BH Double – Buchanan 21 or older 2 48 0.41% $5,298 - - -Total Buchanan 406 3.50% - 409 3.23% -UD Single – Eaton & Martin 18 0.16% $6,526 17 0.13% $6,624UD Double – Eaton & Martin 534 4.60% $5,675 538 4.25% $5,760UD Corner Suite - Martin 28 0.24% $6,607 28 0.22% $6,706UD Lofted Suite - Martin 74 0.64% $7,540 74 0.58% $7,653Total Union Drive 654 5.63% - 657 5.19% -Total Suite Style 1,108 9.55% - 1,114 8.80% -

Total Residence Hall Rooms 7,243 62.40% - 7,251 57.26% -

Area Frederiksen Court Beds % System Rate Beds % System RateFC 2 Bedroom Shared 620 5.34% $4,189 624 4.93% $4,252FC 2 Bedroom Private 18 0.16% $6,424 22 0.17% $6,520FC 4 Bedroom Private 1,556 13.41% $5,257 2,036 16.08% $5,336Total Frederiksen Court 2,194 18.90% - 2,682 21.18% -SV 2 Bedroom, 1 Level 155 1.34% $5,331 156 1.23% $5,384SV 2 Bedroom, 1 Level - Pet 24 0.21% $5,574 24 0.19% $5,630UV 1 Bedroom, 1 Level 8 0.07% $4,604 8 0.06% $4,650UV 2 Bedroom, 1 Level 48 0.41% $4,945 48 0.38% $4,994UV 2 Bedroom Townhouse 554 4.77% $5,260 545 4.30% $5,313UV 2 Bedroom Townhouse - Pet 314 2.71% $5,574 324 2.56% $5,630UV 2 Bedroom Townhouse - Furnished 60 0.52% $5,574 60 0.47% $5,630Total Schilletter & University Village 1,163 10.02% - 1,165 9.20% -Total Student Apartments 3,357 28.92% - 3,847 30.38% -

DOR System Beds % System Rate Beds % System RateTotal Permanent Spaces 10,600 91.32% - 11,098 87.63% -Total Interim Spaces 3 436 3.76% - 436 3.44% -Total Leased Spaces 4 500 4.31% - 1,059 8.36% -Total Student Bed Spaces 11,536 99.39% - 12,593 99.44% -SUV Furnished Guest Apartments 71 0.61% $1,116 71 0.56% $1,209SUV Unfurnished Guest Apartments 0 0.00% $806 0 0.00% $899Total Guest Apartments 71 0.61% - 71 0.56% -Total DOR System 11,607 100.00% - 12,664 100.00% -

1. Beginning fall 2014, Linden Hall is no longer offered as Plus Break. These totals are now included in the RC and UD totals.2. Beginning fall 2014, Buchanan Hall no longer offers a 21 and older floor.3. Interim housing rates are equal to the double, triple, or quad room rate for the building in which they are located.4. These new spaces consist of off-campus property that the DOR leased and began operating as on-campus housing for fall 2013. Rates are consistent with Frederiksen Court.


ROOM STYLE DEMAND

Figures include only those preferences listed as a FIRST choice and are based on new and returning student contracts. The number of bed spaces listed is indicative of what was OFFERED to students as available and on-line.

Rooms and Rates, System DistributionResidence Halls - Traditional Style Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Demand

VarianceArea Room Type Capacity Demand + / - Capacity Demand + / -RC Double Room - AC 1,072 641 -431 1,072 651 -421 10RC Double Room - Maple 440 916 476 440 1,064 624 148RC Double Room - No AC 283 312 29 504 388 -116 76RC Double Room - No AC, Plus Break 287 182 -105 0 0 - -RC Double Room - No AC, Single Gender 755 279 -476 824 253 -571 -26RC Single Room - No AC 39 59 20 43 51 8 -8RC Single Room - No AC, Plus Break 5 13 8 0 0 - -RC Single Room - No AC, Single Gender 95 77 -18 93 67 -26 -10RC Any Richardson Court - 10 - - 12 - 2Total Richardson Court 2,976 2,489 -487 2,976 2,486 -490 -3UD Double Room - AC 695 1,179 484 695 1,199 504 20UD Double Room - AC, Sub. Free 166 754 588 166 741 575 -13UD Double Room - No AC - Friley 808 385 -423 808 305 -503 -80UD Double Room - No AC, Sub. Free 31 36 5 31 32 1 -4UD Single Room - AC 73 159 86 73 167 94 8UD Single Room - No AC - Friley 32 61 29 33 39 6 -22UD Any Union Drive - 12 - - 9 - -3Total Union Drive 1,805 2,586 781 1,806 2,492 686 -94TW Double Room - No AC 1,029 133 -896 1,030 145 -885 12TW Single - Wallace & Wilson 60 67 7 60 68 8 1Total Towers 1,089 200 -889 1,090 213 -877 13Total Traditional Style 5,870 5,275 -595 5,872 5,191 -681 -84XResidence Halls - Suite Style Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Demand

VarianceArea Room Type Capacity Demand + / - Capacity Demand + / -RC Triple – Maple 48 304 256 48 201 153 -103Total Richardson Court 48 304 256 48 201 153 -103BH Suite Double 208 155 -53 252 298 46 143BH Suite Double – 21 + 48 12 -36 0 0 - -BH Suite Single 126 132 6 157 179 22 47BH Suite Single – 21+ 24 26 2 0 0 - -Total Buchanan 406 325 -81 409 477 68 152UD Suite Double 227 464 237 229 321 92 -143UD Suite Double - Sub. Free 322 855 533 323 844 521 -11UD Suite Double - Corner 28 87 59 28 155 127 68UD Suite Double - Lofted 74 233 159 74 217 143 -16Total Union Drive 651 1,639 988 654 1,537 883 -102Total Suite Style 1,105 2,268 1,163 1,111 2,215 1,104 -53XTotal Residence Hall Preferences 7,161 7,543 382 7,169 7,406 237 -137Student Apartments Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Demand

VarianceArea Frederiksen Court Capacity Demand + / - Capacity Demand + / -FC 2 Bedroom Shared 620 473 -147 624 515 -109 42FC 2 Bedroom Private 17 90 73 22 101 79 11FC 4 Bedroom Shared 1,556 1,472 -84 2,036 1,859 -177 387Total Frederiksen Court 2,193 2,035 -158 2,682 2,475 -207 440SUV Schilletter Village 214 172 -42 205 173 -32 1SUV University Village 887 870 -17 899 826 -73 -44Total Schilletter & University Village 1,101 1,042 -59 1,104 999 -105 -43LEASE Legacy 1 299 280 -19 297 350 53 70LEASE Maricopa & Walton 1 202 122 -80 762 405 -357 283Total Leased 501 402 -99 1,059 755 -304 353Total Student Apartment Preferences 3,795 3,479 -316 4,845 4,229 -616 750X

Total Student Bed Spaces 10,956 12,263 12,014 12,237

X

Non-Type Specific Preferences Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Demand VarianceCapacity Demand + / - Capacity Demand + / -

- Learning Community 2 1,306 993 -313 1,284 1,037 -247 44- No Preference 3 - 248 - - 602 - 354- Triple or Quad Room - RC or UD 4 186 628 442 186 779 593 151

1. These new spaces consist of off-campus property that the DOR has leased and began operating as on-campus housing for fall 2013.2. These spaces are also included in above counts3. No Preference Demand is included in count of Total DOR System.4. Total Triple and Quad room Capacity is included in count of Total Residence Hall Preferences


MEAL PLAN BUY-IN

All data is as of Count Day (10th class day) for the fall semester of the fiscal year.

Mandatory Meal Plans Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Variance# % # % # %

Cyclone Plan 138 2.2% 98 1.5% -40 -29.0%Cardinal Plan 157 2.5% 140 2.2% -17 -10.8%Gold Plan 1 3,844 60.4% 3,652 57.7% -192 -5.0%Silver Plan 1,048 16.5% 1,197 18.9% 149 14.2%Bronze Plan 1,180 18.5% 1,245 19.7% 65 5.5%Total Mandatory Plans 6,367 - 6,332 - -35 -0.5%

Voluntary Meal Plans Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Variance# % # % # %

Cyclone Plan 58 1.4% 87 1.8% 29 50.0%Cardinal Plan 42 1.0% 46 0.9% 4 9.5%Gold Plan 1 709 17.6% 758 15.4% 49 6.9%Silver Plan 371 9.2% 504 10.3% 133 35.8%Bronze Plan 780 19.3% 1,021 20.8% 241 30.9%25 Meal Block Plan 562 13.9% 688 14.0% 126 22.4%50 Meal Block Plan 625 15.5% 717 14.6% 92 14.7%75 Meal Block Plan 354 8.8% 407 8.3% 53 15.0%100 Meal Block Plan 538 13.3% 685 13.9% 147 27.3%Total Voluntary Plans 4,039 - 4,913 - 874 21.6%

All Plans Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Variance# % # % # %

Cyclone Plan 196 1.9% 185 1.6% -11 -5.6%Cardinal Plan 199 1.9% 186 1.7% -13 -6.5%Gold Plan 1 4,553 43.8% 4,410 39.2% -143 -3.1%Silver Plan 1,419 13.6% 1,701 15.1% 282 19.9%Bronze Plan 1,960 18.8% 2,266 20.2% 306 15.6%25 Meal Block Plan 562 5.4% 688 6.1% 126 22.4%50 Meal Block Plan 625 6.0% 717 6.4% 92 14.7%75 Meal Block Plan 354 3.4% 407 3.6% 53 15.0%100 Meal Block Plan 538 5.2% 685 6.1% 147 27.3%Total All Plans 10,406 - 11,245 - 839 8.1%

1. The Gold Plan includes the CA Plan, which for tax reasons does not include Dining Dollar$.


FINANCIAL DATA

Data is as of June 30 of the fiscal year. Data is unaudited.

Operations FY 2013 FY 2014

Revenues $ 86,448,372 $ 95,540,398

Expenditures for operations $ 59,942,982 $ 68,206,656

Net operating revenue $ 26,505,390 $ 27,333,742

% of revenues 30.66% 28.61%

Debt service (due July 1) $ 10,502,919 $ 12,429,5991

% of revenues 12.15% 13.01%

Net operating ratio (%)252.36% 219.91%

(Net operating revenue to debt services)

Net revenue after debt service $ 16,002,471 $ 14,904,142

% of revenues 18.51% 15.60%

Mandatory transfer to reserves $ 500,000 $ 500,000

% of revenues 0.58% 0.52%

Net after debt service and mandatory transfers $ 15,502,471 $ 14,404,142

Administrative Services Fee payment from surplus $ 2,001,928 $ 2,117,087

% of expenditures 3.34% 3.10%

Cash and Investment Balances

Voluntary funds FY 2013 FY 2014

Revenue fund -$ 35 -$ 5,357

Operations and maintenance fund $ 0 $ 0

Improvement fund $ 19,909,935 $ 19,711,214

Surplus fund $ 17,126,360 $ 17,189,743

Subtotal—voluntary fund balances $ 37,036,260 $ 36,895,600

% of gross revenue 42.84% 38.62%

Mandatory funds FY 2013 FY 2014

Sinking fund $ 33,535 $ 0

Bond reserve fund $ 12,104,605 $ 12,755,790

Construction fund $ 11,422,069 $ 654,406

Subtotal—mandatory fund balances $ 23,560,209 $ 13,410,196

Total cash and investment balances $ 60,596,469 $ 50,305,796

1. Actual debt service payment was $12,484,420 (see page 14 for Bond Principal and Interest Due Table). Adjustments totaling $54,820 posted during FY14 included $8,025 to close out dorm issuance expenses, $33,535 for accrued interest proceeds for Series Ref 2013, 2013A, and Ref 2013B, and $13,260 for other bond proceeds


2. BOND PRINCIPAL and INTEREST DUE

Data is as of June 30 of the fiscal year with payments due July 1, 2014.

Series Interest Principal Principal DueFuture Years

Ref 2006 $ 541,194 $ 675,000 $ 12,260,000Ref 2006A $ 299,706 $ 385,000 $ 6,580,0002007 $ 468,675 $ 500,000 $ 10,550,000Ref 2008 $ 230,675 $ 940,000 $ 5,255,000Ref 2009 $ 322,373 $ 605,000 $ 8,165,000Ref 2010 $ 351,553 $ 715,000 $ 10,350,000Ref 2011 $ 546,800 $ 850,000 $ 15,015,000Ref 2011A $ 373,075 $ 620,000 $ 10,775,000Ref 2013 $ 509,096 $ 740,000 $ 15,840,0002013A $ 754,366 $ 940,000 $ 24,060,000Ref 2013B $ 232,213 $ 390,000 $ 4,960,0002013C 1 $ 154,694 $ 340,000 $ 8,410,000Total $ 4,784,420 $ 7,700,000 $ 132,220,000

FACILITIES SUMMARY

FY 2013 FY 2014 ChangeTotal Gross Square Feet 3,253,243 3,467,818 214,575 2

Total Insured Value $ 467,309,696 $ 490,624,705 $23,315,009

Building and Capital Improvement Expenditures FY 2013 FY 2014 ChangeTotal Building Improvements $ 3,272,273 $ 6,570,572 $ 3,298,299 3

Capital ImprovementsImprovement Funds (205-09-05, 205-09-45) 1 $ 7,547,428 $ 6,433,791 $ (534,629)Revenue Bonds (205-02-00) 2 $ 11,504,939 $ 18,740,655 $ 7,235,716 4

Total Capital Improvements $ 19,052,367 $ 25,174,446 $ 6,701,087

Total Building and Capital Improvement Expenditures $ 22,324,640 $ 31,745,017 $ 9,420,378

Expenditures per Gross Square Foot FY 2013 FY 2014 ChangeBuilding Expenditures per Gross Square Foot $ 1.01 $ 1.89 $ 0.51Capital Expenditures per Gross Square Foot $ 5.86 $ 7.26 $ 0.10 5

Total Expenditures per Gross Square Foot $ 6.87 $ 9.15 $ 0.61

1. Series 2013C is the second issue of bonds for Frederiksen Court Apartment expansion project.2. Increase includes new Frederiksen Court apartments (6 buildings) and a 3000 GSF addition at 200 University Village.3. Spending for Building Improvements doubled for FY14. Notable expenses for building improvements include the following: Landscaping ($338K), Maple Willow Larch Hall

Desk Remodel ($261K), Furniture for Off-Campus Leased Apartments ($1.37M), Water Bottle Fill Stations ($318K), Oak Elm Furniture ($752K) and Wireless Service Upgrades ($959K). Building Improvements funded during FY14 that will be carried over and expended during FY15 include: Off-campus Apartment Furniture ($1.6M) and Willow Hall Furniture ($1.1M).

4. Frederiksen Court Apartment expansion began during FY13, with 240 beds opening for fall 2013, and 480 beds opening spring 2014. No expenses were reported on the FY13 Annual Report. However, this reporting was incorrect and $11,504,939 in expenses posted to the Construction Fund during FY13.

5. FY13 and FY14 Capital Expenditures per GSF include Frederiksen Court new construction expenses. Capital Expenditures per GSF excluding Frederiksen Court construction expenses are $2.32 for FY13 and $1.86 for FY14.1.


APPENDIX A – EXPLANATION OF CHANGES TO DESIGN CAPACITY

FALL 2014 CHANGES TO DESIGN CAPACITYPermanent Housing Space

NH HALL ROOM Spaces ReasonFC BLDG. 24 30 4-bedroom, 4 person apartments added 120 New Construction, Opened SP14FC BLDG. 81 30 4-bedroom, 4 person apartments added 120 New Construction, Opened FA14FC BLDG. 82 30 4-bedroom, 4 person apartments added 120 New Construction, Opened SP14FC BLDG. 83 30 4-bedroom, 4 person apartments added 120 New Construction, Opened SP14RC FREEMAN 209 -2 Den taken off-line. Per Fire Marshall, cannot be occupied.RC LYON 207 -2 Den taken off-line. Per Fire Marshall, cannot be occupied.SV SCHILLETTER FAMILY 3B, 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D -5 Family units converted to GuestSV SCHILLETTER GUEST 3B, 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D 5 Family units converted to GuestUD FRILEY C185, C187 -8 Den taken off-line. Per Fire Marshall, cannot be occupied.Total Change to Standard Housing Spaces 468

x

Interim / Leased Housing Space

NH HALL ROOM Spaces ReasonOFF MARICOPA 7 buildings located in West Ames 312 Leased to meet increased demandOFF WALTON 9 buildings located in West Ames 252 Leased to meet increased demandTotal Change to Interim Housing Spaces 564

x

Total System Changes to Design Capacity 1,032

APPENDIX B – EXPLANATION OF OFF-LINE SPACE

FALL 2014 EXPLANATION OF OFF-LINE SPACEResidence Halls Room(s) Spaces ReasonEATON 1145 2 Tour RoomFRILEY 2216 2 Tour RoomMARTIN 2127 1 Residence Life StaffWILSON 10423 1 Facilities Issue

Total Residence Halls 6x

Single Student Apts. Apt.(s) Spaces Reason

FREDERIKSEN3312, 3481, 4112, 4212, 4318, 6118, 6218, 7212, 7318 18 Private Bedroom3111, 4111 8 Residence Life Staff4213 4 Tour

Total Frederiksen 30

UNIVERSITY VILLAGE126A, 141D 3 Facilities Issue172B 2 Residence Life Staff173A 2 Tour Apt.

Total University Village 7

Total Student Apts. 37x

Total Permanent Spaces 43x

Leased Spaces Room(s) Spaces ReasonLEGACY 501 1 Facilities IssueLEGACY 503 1 Residence Life StaffMARICOPA 102 BLDG. 3906 4 Residence Life StaffWALTON 106 BLDG. 1224 2 Residence Life Staff

Total Leased Spaces 8x

Guest Housing Room(s) Spaces ReasonSCHILLETTER 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D 4 Storage


3B 1 Tour Apt.

Total Student Apts. 5x

Total DOR System 56


fy 1997 annual report - iowa state university · web viewiowa state university department of...

Documents