future directions for geolibraries

30
Future Directions for Geolibraries Michael F. Goodchild University of California Santa Barbara

Upload: jam

Post on 19-Jan-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Future Directions for Geolibraries. Michael F. Goodchild University of California Santa Barbara. Geolibrary. A library that is searchable by geographic location "What have you got about there ?" impossible in the physical library space is continuous and multidimensional - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Future Directions for Geolibraries

Future Directions for GeolibrariesFuture Directions for Geolibraries

Michael F. Goodchild

University of California

Santa Barbara

Page 2: Future Directions for Geolibraries

GeolibraryGeolibrary

A library that is searchable by geographic location– "What have you got about there?"– impossible in the physical library

• space is continuous and multidimensional

– enabled in the digital world

Page 3: Future Directions for Geolibraries

From the UCSB Map and Imagery Laboratory to the Alexandria Digital Library

From the UCSB Map and Imagery Laboratory to the Alexandria Digital Library

NSF funding 1994-2004 Universal access

– www.alexandria.ucsb.edu Searchable catalog

– a subset of FGDC– MARC compliant– approaching 3 million records

Downloadable objects Map, coordinate, and gazetteer interfaces

Page 4: Future Directions for Geolibraries

1994-19991994-1999 Proliferation of warehouses, geospatial data

libraries, clearinghouses– user interfaces, catalogs

How to know where to look?– the knowledge of the SAP– by data type

• DOQs, DEMs, DLGs, DRGs– by regional emphasis– by thematic emphasis– the collection-level metadata problem

How to achieve interoperability?

Page 5: Future Directions for Geolibraries

CLM of the Alexandria Digital Library

Page 6: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 7: Future Directions for Geolibraries

http://www.thesalmons.org/lynn/wh-greenwich.html

Page 8: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 9: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 10: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 11: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 12: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 13: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 14: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 15: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 16: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 17: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 18: Future Directions for Geolibraries

Geoportals: 2000-2005Geoportals: 2000-2005

A single point of access– Geography Network– Geospatial One-Stop

Offering both data and services "Live data"

– using OGC standards

Providers "publish" to the site Automated metadata harvesting

– from collaborating sites– GOS at 76,000 data sets in 1/05

Page 19: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 20: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 21: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 22: Future Directions for Geolibraries

GOS coverage, 1/05

Page 23: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 24: Future Directions for Geolibraries

There Will Always Be More Than One ShopThere Will Always Be More Than One Shop

Competition– between agencies, levels of government, public

and private sectors Segmentation

– not all providers of geospatial information are content to be part of a single whole

Disciplines– not all disciplines see the geospatial content of

data sets as their primary characteristic Jurisdictions

– GOS is national

Page 25: Future Directions for Geolibraries

CLM revisitedCLM revisited

Regional partitions– a data set is most likely to be found on a

server located within the region Thematic partitions Data type and format partitions Level-of-government partitions

– a data set is most likely to be found on a server maintained by an agency whose footprint most closely matches that of the data set

Page 26: Future Directions for Geolibraries

FunctionsFunctions

The library model– search and retrieval of information objects– legacy granularity– OGC standards support subset but not

superset– gatekeeper

Towards an information model– answers to queries– independent of the source– which is the world's highest capital city?

Page 27: Future Directions for Geolibraries

Geolibraries as GISGeolibraries as GIS

Focus on queries rather than data acquisition

Fully functional servers Accurately georeferenced

Page 28: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 29: Future Directions for Geolibraries
Page 30: Future Directions for Geolibraries

The future of geolibrariesThe future of geolibraries

Mixed models– libraries serving information objects– information sources responding to queries

The CLM problem– SAPs have an assured future

Multiple sources will not agree– conflation– "A person with one watch always knows

what time it is; a person with two is always uncertain"