friends of harfordfriendsofharford.com/.../09/pp-6-10-17-foh-annual-mtg-.pdf · 2019. 7. 1. ·...

51
Friends of Harford Annual Meeting June 10, 2017

Upload: others

Post on 01-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Friends of Harford

    Annual MeetingJune 10, 2017

  • FRIENDS OF HARFORD

    Dedicated to a vision of Harford County

    as a community where an exceptional quality of life is achieved through respecting the

    environment and the needs of all citizens by:

    Protecting the environment

    Improving neighborhoods and

    Improving open space and our rural character

  • FRIENDS OF HARFORDANNUAL MEETING

    June 10, 2017

    AGENDA

    1:30 Call to Order & Introduction of Dignitaries

    1:35 Election of Officers & Board of Directors

    1:45 FoH Treasurer’s Report

    1:50 FoH Annual Report

    2:00 Program:FoH’s Positions onComprehensive Zoning Requests

    3:15 Adjourn for Socializing/Refreshments

  • FRIENDS OF HARFORD2017 Officers

    Morita BruceStephanie Flasch

    (Co-Presidents)

    Alan Sweatman(Vice President)

    Bill Onorato(Treasurer)

    Beth Poggioli(Communications)

    Lee Crush(Secretary)

  • FRIENDS OF HARFORDBoard Members

    Sally LaBarre (Past President)Judy Blomquist (Past President)

    Patti DallamGlenn Dudderar

    Janet Hardy

    Ron HenryGloria Moon

    Tracey Slaughter

    Florian Svitak

  • Friends of Harford Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2017

    (2016 - 2017)

    Friends of Harford (FoH) is proud to be "The Citizens Voice for Responsible Land Use". Our goal is a fair balance between the rights of those wanting to develop a property and the rights of neighbors who might be harmed by that development. This past year, our focus has been on the transition from the HarfordNEXT Master Plan to its implementation via the Comprehensive Zoning Review (CZR) process. Friends of Harford has:

    Completely revised our website to make it more user-friendly and to provide even more information, pictures and links to answer the questions we were receiving from the public. It is actively providing information to support public participation in the CZR process.

    Issued FoH News & Views opposing: - HarfordNEXT's proposed study to expand development in the Route 543 area between I-95 and Route 1, since sufficient

    vacant land already exists inside the Development Envelope, - Harford's decision not to adequately fund stormwater remediation projects to reduce dangers of flooding, erosion,

    infrastructure damage and pollution of downstream properties, - The County Council's process that prevents public knowledge of (and ability to speak about) major amendments to

    legislative bills which can have major impacts on us, and - Enabling low-intensity B1 (neighborhood business) properties to be intensively developed with very high-impact B3, R4

    and all Industrial Uses via “Mixed Use Centers”. (Requires at least 5 acres, be inside the Development Envelope and be on public water and sewer.)

    Worked with the Administration to promote awareness of and encourage public participation in CZR. We held a well-attended public meeting to describe the CZR process and opportunities for public input. Of particular importance was informing the public that each piece of property already has one (or more) zoning districts on it. We explained what “zoning districts” are and what can happen in each.

    Improved the format of, and issued, 34 “FoH Alerts” for: HarfordNEXT; CZR's Planning Advisory Board public input meetings; county budget hearings; Bill 16-029 which authorized the Magnolia Neighborhood Overlay District; and many Community Input Meetings (CIM) and Development Advisory Committee (DAC) meetings.

    Responded to individuals' queries and met with community groups.

    Visited and analyzed each of the115 CZR issues. We provided the Department of Planning & Zoning our position on each rezoning request and our rationale for issues we oppose.

    This coming year we will:

    Focus on the CZR process, advocating for our positions, explaining them, and discussing the issues with members of the Administration and County Council.

    Keep you informed via our website, FoH Alerts, and FoH News & Views.

    Review land use legislation and publish on our website the voting records of Council members on land use bills and resolutions.

    Identify needed changes in law (e.g., updating confusing zoning law, adding language to enforce protections promised in the Zoning Code, and allowing public testimony on amendments).

  • How the County Council Voted

  • Impacts That Concern Us

    LAND USE

    • If it conflicts with any part of County’s Master Plan (HarfordNEXT)

    • If it is outside the Development Envelope and Rural Villages

    • If it is too intense a use next to surrounding properties

    ROAD SAFETY

    • If it worsens congestion on an already congested road

    • If it could create safety hazards for pedestrians or bicyclists

    • If it will lead to dangerous conditions for vehicles

    EXISTING NEIGHBORS

    • If their current quality of life will be harmed

    • If they believe the request is wrong for their neighborhood

    • If the change would not fit the neighborhood's character

    ENVIRONMENT

    • If it might degrade wetlands, the Chesapeake Bay or its

    tributaries

    • If there is too much impervious surface created

    • If mature trees, farms, or threatened species are not protected

  • Friends of Harford – Uses allowed by R1, R2, R3 and R4 zoning districts

    R1 R2 R3 R4

    AMUSEMENTS

    Country clubs, golf clubs, tennis and swim clubs SE SE SE SE

    Marinas, boat launching, storage and repair SE SE SE SE

    INSTITUTIONAL

    Cemeteries, memorial gardens and crematories SE SE SE SE

    Civic service clubs and fraternal organizations SE SE SE SE

    Community centers or assembly halls SE SE SE SE

    Day-care centers SE SE SE SE

    Fire stations P P P P

    Fire stations with fire station assembly hall SE SE SE SE

    Hospitals SE SE SE

    Houses of worship P P P P

    Libraries P P P P

    Mixed Use Centers SD

    Parks; recreation areas, centers and facilities P P P P

    Planned Employment Centers SD(1)

    Schools, colleges, and universities SE SE SE SE

    NATURAL RESOURCES

    Agriculture P P P P

    Forestry P P P P

    Mineral extraction and processing SE SE SE SE

    Wildlife refuge P P P P

    RESIDENTIAL: Conventional Development

    Duplex dwellings P

    Garden apartment dwellings SD

    Lot-line dwellings P

    Mid-rise apartment dwellings SD

    Mixed Use Centers SD

    Mobile home subdivisions SD SD

    Mobile homes SE SE

    Patio/court/atrium dwellings P

    Semi-detached dwellings P

    Single Family detached dwellings P P P P

    Townhouse dwellings P

  • Some Questions We Asked During Our Evaluations

    HarfordNEXT Master Plan

    Is property outside the Development Envelope or at the edge?

    Is it is too intense for this location?

    Does it conflict with the Land Use Plan?

    Does it support its Community Area Plan?

    Impact Of Added Traffic

    Could it create safety issues? “Strong NO”

    Are congestion and/or access problems probable? “Not Good”

    Impacts On Neighbors And Community

    What Uses are allowed by the requesting zoning?

    What quality-of-life protections exist?

    Might this zoning change the character of the neighborhood?

    Does it fit with what's around it, or is it “spot zoning”?

    Impacts On The Environment

    Farms, streams, forests, steep slopes, wetlands, threatened species

    Can we recommend a solution that would be

    a win for both the property owner and the public?

  • District Team Leaders/Presenters

    A Gloria Moon

    B Stephanie Flasch

    C Sally LaBarre

    D Morita Bruce

    E Bill Onorato

    F Glenn Dudderar

  • Issue # Map # Parcel # Property Address (Owner)

    To

    tal A

    crea

    ge

    Acr

    es t

    o R

    ezo

    ne

    Cu

    rren

    t Zo

    nin

    g

    Req

    ues

    t Z

    on

    ing

    AG +/-

    Ou

    tsid

    e D

    E ?

    FO

    H P

    osi

    tio

    n O

    K

    FO

    H P

    osi

    tio

    n N

    OT

    Go

    od

    FO

    H P

    osi

    tio

    n S

    tro

    ng

    NO

    Notes: Why 'NOT Good' or 'Strong No'

    DISTRICT A

    A001 65 784 1101 Oak Ave (Feazell) 1.92 1.92 R1 B3 XZBA 5843 approval of variance imposes conditions agreed to by owner and neighbors. B3

    zoning removes all conditions

    A002 69 104 622 Joppa Farm Rd (Kent-Good Shepherd Church) 4.1239 2.655 R3/B2 B2 X Neighbors approve.

    A003 61 199 2511 Philadelphia Rd (Patel) 0.62 0.62 RO B2 X Unsafe traffic access at intersection of Rts 24 /7 Neighbors oppose

    A004 61 200 2513 Philadelphia Rd (Patel) 1.52 1.52 RO B2 X Unsafe traffic access at intersection of Rts 24 /7 Neighbors oppose

    A005 69 274 Intersection Ft Hoyle/MD 152 (Salvo) 3.84 3.84 R2 CI X Rt 152 frontage of R2, spot zoning. Wetland.

    A006 65 1077 20 parcels Trimble Rd (Est of Vacek) 8.02 8.02 R1 R3 X

    A006 thru A017: Foster Run development. Major opposition from neighbors. Properties are

    already platted at R2 COS density for 231 units. New MNOD rules create uncertainty to

    what density at R3 might be. Roads are extremely dangerous. Trimble Rd is the only

    access to these properties and has no direct access to Route 40. It goes past Magnolia

    elementary and middle schools. Trimble is narrow with blind hills and sharp curves with

    limited visibility. It is incapable of safely handling the proposed huge increase in traffic.

    Roads are not required to be improved for development, only intersections. Does not

    comply with Master Plan for this area. With wetlands, steep slopes and forests, this is also a

    hub of the Greater Baltimore Wilderness Coalition of Baltimore County, Harford County and

    APG's Green Infrastructure Planning for the Joppa Area.

    A007 65 1077 25 parcels Trimble Rd (Salvo) 4.988 4.988 R1 R3 X

    A008 65 1077 25 parcels Trimble Rd (Salvo) 4.768 4.768 R1 R3 X

    A009 65 1077 25 parcels Trimble Rd (Salvo) 6.086 6.086 R1 R3 X

    A010 65 1077 25 parcels Trimble Rd (Salvo) 21.764 21.764 R1 R3 X

    A011 65 1077 25 parcels Trimble Rd (Salvo) 5.537 5.537 R1 R3 X

    A012 65 1077 20 parcels Trimble Rd (Salvo) 19.626 19.626 R1 R3 X

    A013 65 1077 19 parcels Trimble Rd (Salvo) 4.584 4.584 R1 R3 X

    A014 65 1077 19 parcels Trimble Rd (Salvo) 22.208 22.208 R1 R3 X

    A015 65 1077 25 parcels Trimble Rd (Salvo) 11.268 11.268 R1 R3 X

    A016 65 1077 12 parcels Trimble Rd (Salvo) 2.25 2.25 R1 R3 X

    A017 65 1077 506 Barnacle Ln (Salvo) 0.278 0.278 R1 R3 X

    A018 69 251 SS Riviera Dr (McLamb-Marine Max LLC) 2.3894 2.3894 B2 B3 X Local ownership has discussed plans and neighborhood approves

    A019 69 192 510 Riviera Dr (McLamb-Marine Max LLC) 8.1815 8.1815 B2 B3 X same as A018

    A020 61 201 2607 Philadelphia Rd (Meadows) 2 2 GI CI X ZBA 5855 variance already gives approval. Adjoins Royal Farm CI

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – A001

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – A006

  • Issue # Map # Parcel # Property Address (Owner)

    To

    tal A

    crea

    ge

    Acr

    es t

    o R

    ezo

    ne

    Cu

    rren

    t Zo

    nin

    g

    Req

    ues

    t Z

    on

    ing

    AG +/-

    Ou

    tsid

    e D

    E ?

    FO

    H P

    osi

    tio

    n O

    K

    FO

    H P

    osi

    tio

    n N

    OT

    Go

    od

    FO

    H P

    osi

    tio

    n S

    tro

    ng

    NO

    Notes: Why 'NOT Good' or 'Strong No'

    DISTRICT B

    B001 55 191 2901 Belair Rd (Novak) 1.34 1.34 AG RO -1.34 Y X Bad traffic.

    B002 47 508 2401 Pleasantville Rd (Orlando) 2.962 2.045 AG B1 -2.05 Y XChanges character of the rural neighborhood. Outside Development Envelope (DE) and

    Village.

    B003 55 92 209 Mountain Rd (Kenney) 1.377 0.7521 R2/B3 B3 X Impacts R2 neighbors. Vacant B3 prevalent.

    B004 55 341/398 313/315 Mountain Rd (Qaz-Fallston Mall) 1.868 1.868 AG B3 -1.87 XOutside Fallston Sanitary Subdistrict. HarfordNEXT put in DE; More Business zoning

    unneeded here.

    B005 55 523 2315 Bel Air Rd (Qaz-Fallston Mall) 13.77 13.77 B2 B3 XIn 2004, ZBA 5418 expanded this nonconforming ICSC. Land has wetlands, floods

    Stoneybrook.

    B006 47 421 2019 Fallston Rd (Thomas) 47.03 5.488 RR B1 Y X Next to elementary school, homes. Inappropriate.

    B007 65 106 1306 Old Moutain Rd S (Mirjafari) 3.64 3.64 R1 CI X Access problem. Already lots of vacant CI land already exists nearby.

    B008 55 782 1906 W Grove Ave (Shandroski) 3.26 3.26 B2/R2 B3 X Horrible access road, adjacent to R2.

    B009 55 149 Lts 6/8 W Grove Ave (Shandrowski) 1.11 1.11 B2 B3 X see adjacent B008

    B010 55 180 317 Mountain Rd (Coffey) 3.81 3.81 AG B3 -3.81 X See B004 reasoning. Swamp.

    B011 65 123 1209 Old Mountain Rd S (Anderson) 2.24 2.09 B2 B3 X Spot zoning, intense B3 impacts R1 neighbors. No public sewers.

    B012 55 76 200 Mountain Rd (Euler-Aumur) 33.39 22.959 AG R2 22.96 XSHOULD ONLY GET R1. R2 noncomplies with Harford NEXT & Fallston Community Area

    Plan. Owner said he wanted R1. Next to farm in Ag Pres.

    B013 55 76 220 Mountain Rd (Euler-Aumur) 7.83 1.269 AG B3 -1.27 X

    B014 55 741 2409/2411 Harford Rd (Euler-Aumur) 2.54 0.99 AG R2 -0.99 X SHOULD ONLY GET R1. See B012.

    B015 65 444 510 Philadelphia Rd (Porter-Balcer) 0.561 0.561 B1 B2 X Impacts R1 neighborhood.

    B016 61 652 3008 Laurel Bush Rd (Mason) 1.12 1.12 R1 R3 X

    B017 65 444 514/516 Philadelphia Rd (Porter-Balcer) 1.17 1.17 B1 B2 X See B015

    B018 61 202 3006 Laurel Bush Rd (Rosel) 6.53 6.53 R1 R3 X

    B019 55 81 MD 152 N of Bagley (Price) 23.461 15.57 AG CI -15.6 Y X Out of Development Envelope. CI far too intense in rural area. Conflicts with HarfordNEXT.

    B020 65 635 813 Philadelphia Rd Bechtold) 3.13 3.13 R1 CI X

    B021 65 444 506 Philadelphia Rd (Balcerowicz) 1.76 1.76 R1 B2 X Spot zoning. Opposed by neighbors.

    B022 55 671 402A & 404A Timber Lane (Baker) 21.9 21.9 RR R2 Y XCompletely outside the Development Envelope, so ineligible for R2 zoning. Also is spot

    zoning.

    B023 55 363 310 Nilles Ln (Lott) 2.408 2.408 AG B3 -2.40 X Lots of vacant business zoned land already exists.

    B024 65 36 ES MD 152 (SHA rep Smiley) 1.22 0.03 R1 CI X

    B025 65 636 811 Philadelphia Rd (Cox) 1.2 1.2 R1 CI X

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – B002 & B006

  • 2017 Comp Rezoning – B011

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – B011

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – B004, B010, B012, B014

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – B004, B010, B012, B014

    TRAFFIC

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – B004, B010, B012, B014

    VACANT BUSINESS

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – B019, B022

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – B019, B022

  • Issue

    #

    Map

    #

    Parcel

    #Property Address (Owner)

    To

    tal

    Acr

    eag

    e

    Acr

    es t

    o R

    ezo

    ne

    Cu

    rren

    t Z

    on

    ing

    Req

    ues

    t Z

    on

    ing

    AG +/-

    Ou

    tsid

    e D

    E ?

    FO

    H P

    osit

    ion

    OK

    FO

    H P

    osit

    ion

    N

    OT

    Go

    od

    FO

    H P

    osit

    ion

    Str

    on

    g

    NO Notes: Why 'NOT Good' or 'Strong No'

    DISTRICT C

    C001 41 14 1811 Conowingo Rd (Kluck) 0.52 0.52 R2 CI X1/2acre with house surrounded by other homes on small lots; access to lot

    would be on blind curve. Edge of stable residential neighborhood

    C002 56 149 708 W Ring Factory Rd (Mills) 3.18 3.18 AG R2 -3.18 X

    C003 56 76 2220 Old Emmorton Rd (Walls, Kelly,Kohler) 0.513 0.513 RO B2 X

    C004 41 319 2106 N Fountain Green Rd (Anderson) 1.14 1.14 GI CI X

    C005 41 573/249 1502A/1504 Fountain Green Rd (Moriatis) 3.38 1.26 AG B1 -1.26 XSevere traffic; too close to intersection, spot zoning, surrounded by AG and

    high-priced homes.

    C006 56 377 1703 Emmorton Rd (Milway) 6.22 2.09 R1 RO X

    C007 48 116 821 Bel Air Rd (Nichols) 13.66 4 B3/R1 B3 X

    Expands auto auction property, taking incoming B3 uses too close to

    homes, this portion of split-zoned lot is wooded, steep slope, a buffer to

    large, stable neighborhood behind.

    C008 48 253/256 825 Bel Air Rd 901 Bel Air Rd (Nichols) 2.002 2.002 R1 B3 XNote house closest to renovated home request has been withdrawn.See

    C007.

    C009 49 19 304 Tollgate Rd (Rissling) 0.83 0.83 B1 B3 XStay B1; many empty/struggling stores nearby. Changes character of

    neighborhood.

    C010 49 659 308 Tollgate Rd (Rissling) 0.964 0.964 B1 B3 X See C009

    C011 49 381 310 Tollgate Rd (Rissling) 0.53 0.53 B1 B3 X See C009

    C012 49 167 702 Terrace Drive (Perini) 0.43 0.43 R2 B3 X Spot zoning, impacts existing neighborhood

    C013 49 15 500 Terrace Drive (Valis) 0.43 0.43 R2 B3 X Spot zoning, impacts existing neighborhood

    C014 49 16 312 S Tollgate Rd (Ewell) 0.674 0.674 R2 B3 X Rezone only to B1. See C009

    C015 49 158 314 Silver Spring Dr (Greig) 1.136 l.136 R2 R4 X

    C016 40 126 104 Rock Spring Church Rd (O'Neill) 7.49 7.49 RR AG 7.49 Y X

  • 2017 Rezoning Request - C001

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – C005

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – C012, C013

  • Issue #Map

    #Parcel # Property Address (Owner)

    To

    tal A

    crea

    ge

    Acr

    es t

    o R

    ezo

    ne

    Cu

    rren

    t Zo

    nin

    g

    Req

    ues

    t Z

    on

    ing

    AG +/-

    Ou

    tsid

    e D

    E ?

    FO

    H P

    osi

    tio

    n O

    K

    FO

    H P

    osi

    tio

    n N

    OT

    Go

    od

    FO

    H P

    osi

    tio

    n S

    tro

    ng

    NO

    Notes: Why 'NOT Good' or 'Strong No'

    DISTRICT D

    D001 33 429 2220 Rock Spring Rd (Ward) 22.98 1.1 RR B3 XD001, D002 & D007: B3 allows 85% impervious surface. This on the sites' steep slope will

    likely destroy the endangered bog turtle habitat. ZBA 5106 previously denied another

    intense use.

    D002 33 429 2220 Rock Spring Rd (Ward) 22.98 21.87 RR R2 X

    D003 34 213 2202 Conowingo Rd (Spicer) 0.748 0.1 AG B3 -0.10 X

    D004 34 37 2206 Conowingo Rd (Spicer) 2.07 0.3 AG B3 -0.30 Y X impacts adjacent nice home as well as AG property

    D005 34 35 2207 Ady Rd (Spicer) 0.827 0.429 AG B3 -0.43 X

    D006 5 30 2415 Whiteford Rd (Tutalo) 1.55 1.55 VB B2 Y X

    REZONE TO VB. This is in a Rural Village and VB permits what owner says he wants to do

    D007 33 429 2226 Rock Spring Rd (Ward) 12.18 12.18 RR B3 X see D001 and D002

    D008 5 32 2419 Whiteford Rd (Tutalo) 21.303 10.086 GI B2 Y XREZONE TO VB. This is in a Rural Village and VB permits what the owner says he wants to

    do

    D009 27 435 1616 Poole Rd (Miller) 3 3 AG CI -3.00 Y X

    D010 40 382 1651 Robin Circle (Chapolini) 2.62 2.62 GI B3 X

    D011 40 382 460 Granary Rd (O'Brien) 1.3 1.3 GI B3 X

    D012 40 63 1801 Rock Spring Rd (Schilling/Schmitt) 0.68 0.68 R2 RO X

    D013 40 62 1803 Rock Spring Rd (Springham) 1.63 1.63 R2 RO X

    D014 8 12 5986 Norrisville Rd (Thomas) 2.8934 0.788 AG B3 0.789 Y X

    D015 23 132 4115 Norrisville Rd (Cook) 7.86 7.86 AG B3 -7.86 Y XHuge expansion of highest Business intensity zoning in rural area of AG and small

    businesses.

    D016 32 500 1356 Wiley Rd (Button) 8.84 8.84 RR AG 8.84 Y X

    D017 32 500 EW Highway Baldwin Rd (Button) 14.13 14.13 RR AG 14.13 Y X

    D018 41 9 2201 Jack Lane (Cohen) 1.77 1.77 CI B3 X

    D019 41 9 Jack Lane (Cohen) 0.18 0.18 CI B3 X

    D020 41 9 2 lots Jack Lane (Cohen) 0.93 0.93 CI B3 X

    D021 41 9 2204 Jack Lane (Cohen) 1.06 1.06 CI B3 X

    D022 41 9 2200 Jack Lane (Cohen) 0.6 0.6 CI B3 X

    D023 41 9 6 lots Jack Lane (Cohen) 8.48 8.48 CI B3 X

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – D001, D002, D007

  • 2017 Comp Rezoning – D006, D008

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – D015

  • Issue

    #

    Ma

    p #

    Parcel

    #Property Address (Owner)

    To

    tal A

    crea

    ge

    Acr

    es to

    Rez

    on

    e

    Cu

    rren

    t Zo

    nin

    g

    Req

    ues

    t Zo

    nin

    g

    AG

    +/-

    Ou

    tsid

    e D

    E ?

    FO

    H P

    osi

    tio

    n O

    K

    FO

    H P

    osi

    tio

    n N

    OT

    Go

    od

    FO

    H P

    osi

    tio

    n S

    tro

    ng

    NO

    Notes: Why 'NOT Good' or 'Strong No'

    DISTRICT E

    E001 51 925 3644 Churchville Rd (Esper) 0.25 0.25 AG B3 -0.25 Y X In front of Ripken Stadium complex *

    E002 51 925 3650 Churchville Rd (Earhart) 0.36 0.36 AG B3 -0.36 Y X see E001 *

    E003 51 925 3646/3648 Churchville Rd (Desch/Elkins/Esper) 0.91 0.91 AG B3 -0.91 Y X see E001 *

    E004 51 925 3652 Churchville Rd (Baine) 0.36 0.36 AG B3 -0.36 Y X see E001 *

    E005 51 925 3654 Churchville Rd (Chow, Esper) 0.37 0.37 AG B3 -0.37 Y X see E001 *

    E006 51 926 944 Gilbert Rd (Reher) 5.82 5.82 AG B3 -5.82 Y X see E001 *

    E007 42 454 2215 Churchville Rd (Lozinak) 8.9 8.9 B2 B3 Y XOut of Development Envelope; highest zoning nearby is B2 with

    small businesses, AG in front and behind; B3 is spot zoning.

    E008 38 49 921 S Stepney Rd (Bosworth) 15.8 15.8 R1 R2 XAdequate R2 exists; nearby Beechtree still unsold and developer is

    withdrawing in spite of TIF.

    E009 42 31 2011 E Churchville Rd (Bosworth) 25.91 2.5 B2 B3 Y X ZBA 5853; spot zoning, same reasons as nearby E007

    E010 42 109 MD 22 Churchville Rd (McGuirk) 3.4041.00

    m/lAG VB -1.00 Y X

    E011 51 11 3452 Churchville Rd (Driver) 4.6 4.6 RR CI Y X

    REZONE TO AG , with Special Exception and variance to continue

    community-supported use as butcher shop and retail meat sales.

    Rural area. CI is spot zoning with improper, high impact uses.

  • 2017 Comp Rezoning – E007

  • 2017 Comp Rezoning – E007

  • 2017 Comp Rezoning – E007

    Credit – Baltimore Sun/Aegis

  • 2017 Comp Rezoning – E007

    Credit – Baltimore Sun/Aegis

  • 2017 Comp Rezoning – E008

  • 2017 Comp Rezoning – E008

  • 2017 Comp Rezoning – E008

  • 2017 Comp Rezoning – E008

  • 2017 Comp Rezoning – E009

  • 2017 Comp Rezoning – E009

  • 2017 Comp Rezoning – E009

    Credit – Baltimore Sun/Aegis

  • 2017 Comp Rezoning – E009

    Credit – Baltimore Sun/Aegis

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – E011

  • Issue #Map

    #Parcel # Property Address (Owner)

    To

    tal A

    crea

    ge

    Acr

    es t

    o R

    ezo

    ne

    Cu

    rren

    t Zo

    nin

    g

    Req

    ues

    t Z

    on

    ing

    AG +/-

    Ou

    tsid

    e D

    E ?

    FO

    H P

    osi

    tio

    n O

    K

    FO

    H P

    osi

    tio

    n N

    OT

    Go

    od

    FO

    H P

    osi

    tio

    n S

    tro

    ng

    NO

    Notes: Why 'NOT Good' or 'Strong No'

    DISTRICT F

    F001 58 191/192 MD 7 S Aberdeen (Wright) 88.01 88.01 R4 GI X ok IF no exit onto Rt 159 or Old Stepney

    F002 61 525 3520 Woodsdale (Scheuerman) 2.05 2.05 R4 B3 XCrosses dividing line between CI and Residential; would eliminate buffers that exist on

    other sides of CI “block”, Impacts neighbors!

    F003 57 11 917 Cedar Lane (Eisner/Stiller) 121.34 121.34 AG RI -121.34 Y X

    Almost entirely outside the Development Envelope. Is in Bynum Run Conservation Area.

    Forested, steep slopes. Wrong to rezone before HarfordNEXT's Creswell area study even

    begins.

    F004 62 522 3605 Philadelphia Rd (Spencer) 5.41 5.41 R2 B2 XFailed intersection; no need for more B zoning; impacts houses & historical residence

    across street

    F005 57 362 25 parcels Treese Way (Guilio) 115.612 115.61 R1 R2 X

    F005-F010: Laurel Bush Rd should first be widened and improved to resemble the

    southern part of Tollgate Rd, including bike lanes. Sediment erosion controls (SEC), steep

    slopes (SS), and storm water management (SWM) may not be able to protect nearby Bynum

    Run.

    F006 57 362 25 parcels Treese Way (Guilio) - R1 R2 X

    F007 57 362 25 parcels Treese Way (Guilio) - - R1 R2 X

    F008 57 362 25 parcels Treese Way (Guilio) - R1 R2 X

    F009 57 362 24 parcels Treese Way (Guilio) - R1 R2 X

    F010 57 362 25 parcels Laurel Bush Rd (Guilio) - R1 R2 X

    F011 57 362 1 parcel Treese Way (Guilio) 1.2 1.2 AG R2 -1.20 X

    Recently placed inside Development Envelope. Promised study of this area not done. Too

    intense a use next to AG. Strong neighborhood opposition.F012 63 362 2 parcels Treese Way (Guilio) 20.09 20.09 AG R2 -20.09 X

    F013 63 var 3 parcels 801 Chelsea Rd (Bishop) 6.736 6.736 AG GI -6.74 X Access roads & intersections already a disaster.

    F014 58 var 5 parcels Old Phila Rd (Nichols) 5.03 5.03 R3 CI X Rt 7 upgrade needed; enforce SEC,SS & SWM.

    F015 58 27/35 4827/4835 Old Philadelphia Rd (Nichols) 5 5 R3 CI X same as F014

    F016 63 304 200 Chelsea Rd (Pearce/Mitchell) 7.81 7.81 R1 LI X same as F013

    F017 63 308 201 Chelsea Rd (Pearce/Mitchell) 6.16 6.16 R1 LI X same as F013

    F018 63 62 1625 Perryman Rd (Mitchell/Pearce) 28.623 5.5 B1 LI X same as F013

    F019 58 67 4851 Old Philadelphia Rd (Nichols) 2.25 2.25 R3 CI X same as F014

    F020 58 26 4854 Old Philadelphia Rd (Nichols) 19.08 19.08 GI CI X same as F014

  • 2017 Rezoning Request - F004

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – F003

  • Creswell Bump-out Map

  • 2017 Rezoning Request – F11, F12

  • Friends of Harford

    Thank You For Coming!

    www.friendsofharford.com