frb_021923
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
FEDERAL RESERVEBULLETIN
(FINAL EDITION)
ISSUED BY THE
FEDERAL RESERVE BOARDAT WASHINGTON
FEBRUARY, 1923
WASHINGTONGOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
1923
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 2: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETINVOL. 9 FEBRUARY, 1923. No. 2
REVIEW OF THE MONTH.
Congress is at the present time endeavoringby legislative enactments to improve the credit
Rural credits ^ a c ^ ^ e 3 available for the useof farmers. Chief among these
are the so-called Capper bill and the Anderson-Lenroot bill, both of which have now passedthe Senate. These legislative projects are theoutcome of the distress suffered by farmers inconsequence of the price declines of 1920 and1921 and of the gaps in our credit organizationbrought to light within the past three years.
I t has become clear that the farmer's needsfor productive credit are not adequately pro-vided for by existing machinery. A decadeago, when the Federal reserve act was being dis-cussed, the general belief prevailed that sixmonths was the maximum period for which thefarmer needed credit, except for the purchaseof land. At present, partly as the result of thefunctioning of the Federal Reserve System,credit for short-term current operations not ex-ceeding six months is, generally speaking, avail-able to the farmer, while the Federal Farm LoanSystem and other existing agencies take care ofthe farmer's needs in purchasing land and per-manent improvements. Developments of thelast two or three years have brought out the fact,however, that additional facilities are requiredto finance the farmer's current long-term opera-tions lasting from six months to three years.
I t is universally recognized that the farmerssuffered severe economic reverses in 1920 and1921, but it is not so generally understood thatthe economic causes of tho farmer's distresswere world-wide in scope and that enlargedcredit facilities are only one of many requisitesfor the improvement of tho farmer's economiccondition and security.
The relation between farm prices of 31 lead-ing agricultural commodities and the general
level of wholesale prices can beEconomic con- expressed in an index number.
d i t i o n o f t h e m , \ , 11 ._ .farmer. This number, computed by Prof.
G. F. Warren's method, aver-aged 80 in 1922, compared with 75 in 1921and 86 in 1920. This index number signifiesthat a given amount of the farmer's productwhich in 1909-1914 would have exchanged forSI worth of other commodities at wholesalewould now bring the farmer only 80 cents'worth of these commodities, while a year agoit would have purchased only 75 cents' worth.It should bo noted, moreover, that this calcu-lation is unduly favorable to the farmer, be-cause it compares the farm value of his prod-uct with the wholesale price of commodities,while as a matter of fact he purchases at retailprices and must in many cases pay additionalheavy transportation charges. I t would be illu-minating to have an index compiled that wouldshow the relationship of the farmer's dollar, real-ized by the sale of his products, to the price ofcommodities which he must buy, weighted in ac-cordance with the relative importance of thesecommodities in the farmer's budget. Imper-fect as the available index numbers are, how-ever, they indicate roughly the extent of thedecline during 1920 and 1921 of tho farmer'sbuying power, and tho extent of its recoveryin 1922 through price readjustment betweenvarious classes of commodities. During the pastyear tho farmer regained some of the groundhe lost during tho years of liquidation, and thisimprovement is attributable in part to the ad-vanco in prices and in part to the larger volumeof crops in 1922 compared with the precedingyear. The following table shows the produc-
137
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 3: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
138 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
tion and prices of leading farm staples in 1920,1921, and 1922:
TOTAL PRODUCTION AND DECEMBER PRICE OF SELECTEDCOMMODITIES.
Corn." bushels . .Cotton ba les . .Winter wheat bushe ls . .
Wool p o u n d s . .Hogs "...100 p o u n d s . .Cattle d o . . . .
Production.
1922
2,890,712,0009,964,000
586,204,000.270,007,000219,095,000123,696,000M0,419,000
1921
3,068,569,0007,953,641
600,316,000214,589,000224,564,000122,080,87018,676,063
t920
3,208,584,00013,439,603
610,597,000222,430,000235,005,000122,433,301)9,969,911
Corn bushel . .Cotton p o u n d . .Winter wheat .bushe l . .Spring wheat doWooL p o u n d . .Hogs 100 p o u n d s . .Cattle ; . . d o .
Price.
1922
$0,657.2381.048.924.9468.26910.581
1921
$0,423.162.951.856.5273
7.0258.2188
1920
$0,670.139
1.4861.304.5455
9.662512.0938
* Yearly receipts at principal markets in United States.
Among the factors affecting the prosperity ofthe American farmer, domestic demand for hisproduct ranks first. It is true that of theleading staples, particularly cotton and wheat,a large proportion is exported and that rela-tively small changes in the supply of staplecommodities exert a disproportionately power-ful influence on their prices, yet it should berecognized that the degree of activity ofdomestic industry and the consequent amountof employment and earnings of labor are themost important influence in the market foragricultural products, certainly in the UnitedStates. In 1922 exports of agricultural com-modities were larger than the year before, butthe increase affected chiefly the cheapercereals—corn, oats, and rye—while exports ofwheat were decidedly reduced. Prices ofpractically all agricultural commodities, how-ever, were higher in 1922 than in 1921, as seenin the table above, and in this recovery betterindustrial conditions, reflected in increasedconsumption by industrial workers, were animportant factor.
Whatever the relative importance of thedifferent factors contributing to the improve-
Long-termcredit.
ment of agricultural conditions may be, it isclear that during the past year the farmeremerged from the depth of an unusually severedepression, and that the time is now opportunefor strengthening his economic condition in sofar as this can be accomplished by improvingthe credit machinery at his command.
Long-term credit requirements of the farmerfor the purpose of land purchase and of per-
manent improvements are sup-plied by private investors, bymortgage companies, by Federal
land banks, by joint stock land banks, byState banks and trust companies, by insurancecompanies, and by national banks, which ob-tained authority to make loans on real estateunder certain restrictions by the Federal reserveact. The system of Federal land banks, thoughit supplies a small per cent of the farmer'slong-term requirements, has been a great helpin reaching such farmers as could not easilyobtain loans through other institutions andin reducing and equalizing interest charges.Generally speaking, it would seem that thefarmer's need for credit of from 5 to 40 years7
duration is fairly well taken care of by exist-ing machinery. With the further developmentof the Federal Farm Loan System, which is nowprogressing at a rapid rate, even more satis-factory provision for the farmer's long-termcredit needs may be anticipated in the nearfuture. A provision in the Capper bill raisingthe maximum of loans by Federal land banksto one individual from $10,000 to $25,000 isintended to increase the service rendered bythese institutions.
Short-term credit requirements of a farmerare primarily for current production needs and
for carrying crops pending or-derly marketing. Three to sixmonths' loans are frequently
sufficient for these purposes, although in someinstances the farmer requires credit for as longas a year or more. It should be borne in mindthat a much larger proportion of farm activitiesthan of industrial activities is conducted with-out being financed by banks or credit institu-tions of any sort. Many farmers are able to
Short-termcredit.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 4: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL BESERVB BULLETIN. 139
meet the winter and spring outlays out of theproceeds of the sale of the past year's crop andto carry on their business without recourse toborrowing. Another large group of farmers isfinanced chiefly through open accounts atlocal stores and through credit from manufac-turers for the purchase of supplies and equip-ment on the installment plan or. otherwise.In this way a large part of the credit actuallyrequired by farmers is granted them in the firstinstance by manufacturers and dealers, who inturn apply for credit to the banks. It is truethat farmers frequently pay high rates for thisaccommodation.
One of the important short-term credit needsof the farmer is for the purpose of carrying his
crops after they are harvested,Loans for car- i t * n T i 1
rying crops, l n order not to flood the marketand not to break the price of
his products. Agriculture is an industry withonly one turnover during the year. The entirecrop is harvested at one time, but its consump-tion is spread over the following year or evenlonger. I t may be laid down as a general prin-ciple that in so far as the farmer holds his cropsfor the purpose of orderly marketing, he isentitled to the support of banks. To theextent, however, that the farmer carries hiscrops beyond the needs of orderly marketingfor the purpose of maintaining or raising theprice by withholding his products, therebycreating a shortage, his conduct is not in thepublic interest and credit demand for thispurpose need not be the occasion for revisingour credit organization. Stated in anotherway, in so far as the farmer's holding of cropscontributes to the even flow of agriculturalproducts to market, it is a legitimate part oforderly marketing, but in so far as it createsa shortage at one season followed by an exces-sive supply at another, it is not a part of theprocess of orderly marketing, but rather a dis-turbing element in the distribution of agricul-tural products.
An amendment to the Federal reserve act,included in both the Capper and in the Lenroot-Anderson bills, provides that Federal reserve
banks may discount acceptances drawn foragricultural purposes with a maturity up to6 months, provided the acceptance is secured bya warehouse receipt for readily marketablestaples. This amendment will make it easierfor farmers to obtain credit for carrying theircrops.
A significant point in connection with creditfor marketing crops is that a large part of it isnot required by farmers themselves, but bydealers whose credit facilities in our commer-cial banking system are generally conceded tobe adequate. It is the dealer who purchasesthe bulk of the farmer's product, carries it tomarket, and frequently holds it in storagebefore selling. To recapitulate, many farmersmanage their business without the necessityof utilizing credit; a large part of the short-term credit requirements of the farmer is takencare of by other agencies than banks; mar-keting credit is essentially commercial creditrather than agricultural credit, and, althoughsome adjustment in our credit machinery inthe interests of the farmer may be necessary,particularly with a view to reducing the costof credit to the farmer, his short-term creditneeds can be satisfied with a fair degree ofadequacy by existing facilities.
It is in the field of productive or so-calledintermediate credit that the farmer is the least
well served. In building up aherd of cattle, in setting out anorchard, in purchasing work
animals and machinery, or in making outlaysfor long-term improvements, such as drainageor irrigation, the farmer needs loans runningfrom 6 months to 3 years. The machinery forthis class of loans has been very inadequatelydeveloped. While farm-loan banks are author-ized to make loans for such purposes, the lawfixes the minimum maturity of these loans at5 years and requires a first mortgage on theland as security. These restrictions decidedlylimit the service that farm-loan banks canrender in providing intermediate credit. Dur-ing the recent credit strain the War FinanceCorporation was empowered to help the farmer
Intermediatecredit.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 5: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
140 FEDERAL KESERVE BULLETIN. , 1923.
in this field and it has accomplished a greatdeal. Its service is greater than the totalvolume of its agricultural loans of $266,000,000would indicate, because it was able to extendthis credit in places where the strain wasgreatest and where its funds accomplished amaximum of service. But the War Finance Cor-poration is admittedly a temporary organizationand will not continue to operate in normaltimes. The development of a system of inter-mediate farm credit on a purely business basisis recognized as one of the important needs ofthe country and the bills under considerationat the present time provide machinery for thegranting of this type of loans.
The Capper bill provides for the organiza-tion, with the approval and under the super-vision of the Comptroller of the Currency, of"Federal agricultural credit" institutions witha minimum capital of $250,000, with powerto make loans for agricultural purposes foras long as 9 months when secured by ware-house receipts covering nonperishable agri-cultural products, and for as long as 3 yearswhen secured by chattel mortgages constitut-ing a first lien on live stock or dairy herds.These institutions are authorized to raise fundsby rediscounting paper discounted with themand by selling 3-year debentures secured bysuch paper. The bill authorizes the reservebanks to purchase acceptances of these corpo-rations whenever the Federal Reserve Boarddeems it in the public interest. The bill alsoprovides for the creation of rediscount corpo-rations with a capital of $1,000,000 or more,empowered to rediscount paper for the Federalagricultural credit corporations.
The Lenroot-Anderson bill, on the otherhand, increases the powers of Federal landbanks and provides for the organization withinthese banks of farm credit departments withan initial capital of $5,000,000 furnished by theUnited States Government. These depart-ments are authorized to issue debentures upto ten times their capital and to use theirfunds in rediscounting for banks and otheragencies paper drawn for agricultural produc-tion and marketing purposes. The bill also
authorizes the farm-loan banks to rediscountpaper with the Federal reserve banks.
Both bills provide for amendments of theFederal reserve act permitting under certainrestrictions the discount by Federal reservebanks of agricultural paper with maturity notexceeding 9 months. The Capper bill alsoextends the life of the War Finance Corpora-tion to the end of February, 1924.
Credit requirements of farmers are closelyrelated to the movement of agricultural prices.
_ . .. - On the one hand, higher pricesFluctuations of „ , , i ? K >
farm prices. call for larger loans in order toproduce and market the same
quantity of crops, while, on the other hand,price declines, such as occurred in 1920, makeit impossible for many farmers to liquidatetheir loans by the sale of their crops and resultin frozen credits and in a consequent increaseof the total volume of outstanding loans.Price stability is therefore greatly to be desiredin the interests of the farmer, among otherreasons, because it would make it easier todetermine and provide for his financial require-ments. And yet it is a well-known fact thatprices of farm products are subject to moreviolent fluctuations than prices of most otherclasses of commodities, and that these upsand downs cause acute distress to farmers.There are several reasons for this phenomenon,one of which is that farms produce largely rawmaterials, and experience shows that prices ofraw materials fluctuate more widely than thoseof manufactured articles. The reason is thatmanufacturers of staple finished products canreduce or discontinue production and cut offpurchases of raw materials when business isslow, while their customers, the wholesaler, theretailer, and the consumer, can not restricttheir purchases of necessities of life so promptlyor so drastically. It should also be mentionedthat credit stringency, which may cause thefarmer to sell his products sooner than hewishes, may also cause shortage of funds tohis purchasers, and may thus be reflected in afall of.. prices . caused both by an increasedsupply and a diminished demand in themarket for agricultural products.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 6: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1920. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 141
Tho volume of the farmer's production ismuch less subject to control than tho volumeof manufactures. Farm production is inelastic.In most cases tho farmer raises crops on hisentire tillable land; his labor supply consistschiefly of his family, and he is not in a positionmaterially to reduce his outlay for labor. Thefarmer is not in a position to tell in advancowhether the decline in prico will bo sufficientto deprive him of tho proceeds of the additionallabor expended in raising a larger crop. Andyet the total value of a large crop is often lessthan the total value of a short crop, as pricesgenerally decline more than in proportion tothe increase in the supply. But the farmer'sgreatest single handicap is lack of cooperationand the resulting scarcity of market informa-tion and bargaining strength. Seven millionfarmers acting individually can not create amarket, but are almost entirely at the mercyof economic forces beyond their control. Itis in cooperation resulting in better plannedproduction and more systematic marketingbased on wider information that lies the chiefremedy for the economic insecurity of the
farmer.What is the relation of the Federal Reserve
to the economic andThe farmer and ythe Federal Be- credit needs of the farmer?serve System. T h e establishment of the Fed-eral Reserve System has saved the farmerfrom the effects of periodic money stringencywhich in past years of credit strain have oftenresulted in financial panic, drastic liquidationof loans, and depression. Through the issu-ance of Federal reserve notes secured byeligible paper the reserve system has put atthe service of the farmer, as well as of others, acurrency that is available at any time inamounts limited practically only by the vol-ume of legitimate requirements. Further-more, the reserves of other reserve banks areat the disposal of any region which is in needof currency. In a year like 1920, for instance,when on top of a large amount of frozen loansthere came a heavy demand for currency formoving record crops, the reserve banks inagricultural districts at one time were borrow
ing as much as 8267,000,000 from those inindustrial districts*
But tho Federal reserve act contains alsospecial provisions for tho farmer's benefit. Itmakes an exception in favor of tho farmer inthat it permits tho rediscount of agriculturalpaper with a maturity extending for as long as6 months, while tho limit for all other classesof paper is 90 days. Tho law provides thattho proportion that agricultural paper mayform of tho entire assets of a reserve bankshall be fixed by tho Federal Reserve Board;and the board fixed this ratio at 09 per centand has never reduced it. In spite of theseprovisions, discounts of paper classified asagricultural or live-stock paper have alwaysconstituted a relatively small proportion oftho total discounts of tho Federal reservebanks. But sueh loans do not even remotelymeasure tho service of the system to the farmer.The farmer may borrow money from his bankon Government securities and these loansmay be rediscounted with tho reserve banks, orhe may borrow on his own note, and his bankmay obtain accommodation from the reservebank on other notes, or borrow from that bankon its own collateral note secured by UnitedStates obligations or other eligible collateral.The connection between the borrowing farmerand tho reserve bank may be even more re-mote. The farmer may, and in a great manycases does, borrow from a nonmember bank,which in order to accommodate him in turnborrows from its city correspondent and thelatter, in order to take care of its correspond-ent, obtains an advance from tho reservebank. This advance, which is by far the mostimportant form of indirect accommodation tofarmers, is in the service of agriculture, but thefunds can not be traced from the reserve bankto the farmer.
In considering the relation of longer-termagricultural credit to the reserve banks theessentially commercial nature of the FederalReserve System should be kept in mind.It should not be forgotten, simply becauseit is elementary, that the Federal reservebanks are the holders of the ultimate re-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 7: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
142 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
serves of the country, that their deposits arenot merely demand deposits but reserve' de-posits, which must be available to the memberbanks at any time in order to protect the latter'sdeposits obtained from the public. For thesereasons the discounts of reserve banks mustalways be of relatively short maturity, thoughthe Federal Reserve Board believes that theextension of the limit of maturity for agricul-tural paper from 6 to 9 months, under propersafeguards and provided the paper is sound inevery respect, would have no unfavorable effecton the liquidity of reserve bank assets. As amatter of fact, the great bulk of the discounts ofthe reserve banks is of much shorter maturitythan the permissible maximum, the averagematurity of paper discounted in October, 1922,for the system being only about 10 days, andranging from less than 4 d&ys at the NewYork bank to over 58 days at the Minneapolisbank.
Recognizing that cooperation for marketingcrops is the best step that farm-
markeUngftlVe e r s c a n t a k e 'm t l l e direction ofimproving their credit standing
and their general economic condition, the Fed-eral Reserve Board in its rulings has gone as faras existing law permits in encouraging loans tocooperative marketing organizations. Theboard has ruled that, whenever the associationsare so organized that they acquire title in thecrops and do not simply sell the crops on com-mission, and whenever they are conducted asmutual nonprofit-making enterprises, billsdrawn by growers and accepted by marketingassociations at the time such growers delivertheir crops to the associations are eligible fordiscount by reserve banks as agriculturalpaper with a maximum maturity of 6 months,provided the proceeds of the discount are usedfor agricultural purposes.
The board has ruled that " a banker's accept-ance drawn by a grower or by a coopera-tive marketing association composed exclu-sively of growers of nonperishable, readilymarketable staple agricultural products, tofinance the orderly marketing of such prod-
ucts grown by such grower or growers and se-cured at the time of acceptance by a warehouse,terminal, or other similar receipt, issued by aparty independent of the borrower and convey-ing security title to such products, may be pur-chased if it has a maturity at the time of pur-chase not in excess of 6 months, exclusive ofdays of grace; provided, that the acceptor re-mains secured throughout the life of the accept-ance, and that the acceptance conforms in otherrespects to the relevant requirements of" ex-isting regulations.
This ruling authorizes the Federal reservebanks to purchase in open market bankers' ac-ceptances drawn by growers or marketing asso-ciations having a maturity up to 6 months, andby this means the market for acceptances sodrawn has been greatly widened, as the abilityof bill brokers to sell such acceptances to thereserve banks enhances the liquidity andattractiveness of the bills. Along this line theLenroot-Anderson bill contains a provisionauthorizing the farm-loan banks to make directloans for from 6 months to 3 years to coopera-tive associations engaged in producing or mar-keting agricultural products or live stock,provided the loans are secured by warehousereceipts, by shipping documents, or by mort-gages on live stock. The Capper bill broadensthe definition of agricultural paper, eligible assuch for discount with reserve banks, so as toinclude certain paper of cooperative marketingassociations. Under existing law such paper isconsidered commercial rather than agriculturalin character and eligible for discount only if itsmaturity does not exceed 90 days. The resultof the proposed change will be to render suchpaper eligible if secured by warehouse receiptswith a maturity up to 9 months.
The Federal Reserve Board has indorsedcertain amendments to the Federal reserve actproposed by both bills under consideration,designed further to increase the usefulness ofthe system to farmers. It is not opposed tothe extension of maximum maturity of certainagricultural paper from 6 to 9 months, andit has indorsed the plan to permit banks with
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 8: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
FEBUUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 143
smaller capital than that now required to jointhe system, provided they will build up thedeficiency during 3 years following theiradmission. The last amendment if enacted willmake it easier for country banks to becomemembers of the Federal Reserve System andwill thus bring the system closer to the farmerand his credit needs. In order to inducesmaller banks to join the reserve system thebills amend the method of distributing reservebank earnings so that, after payment of the6 per cent dividend to members and of anequal amount to the Government, memberbanks will be entitled to receive another 3 percent on their capital, the balance to go to theGovernment.
This survey of the rural credit situationindicates that existing credit machinery iscapable of taking care of the farmer's short-term credit needs fairly well and that improve-ment in this field must be looked for in thedirection of greater standardization of thefarmer's business and products as well as inthe direction of well-managed cooperative ac-tion by the farmers themselves. A real needexists, however, for bringing the fanner incloser contact with the flow of investmentfunds, necessary chiefly for his so-called inter-mediate or productive credit purposes. I t isin this field that improvement of the farmer'seconomic condition may be anticipated fromlegislative action. «*
On January 12 President Harding sent tothe Senate the name of Mr.
Personnel. Milo D. Campbell, of Michigan,to be a member of the Federal
Reserve Board, and the appointment wasconfirmed by the Senate on January 25. Atthe time of his nomination Mr. Campbellwas president of the National Milk Producers'Federation and vice chairman of the NationalCouncil of Farmers' Cooperative Associations.He owns two dairy farms at Coldwater, Mich.Mr. Campbell was born in 1851. He has held anumber of offices in the State of Michigan andhas been a director of banks in Coldwaterand in Detroit. He was at one time a mem-ber of the State legislature, and has been
secretary to the governor, mayor of Cold-water, insurance commissioner, tax com-missioner, and member of the State prisonboard.
On January 6 Mr. W, P. G. Harding, for-merly governor of the Federal Reserve Board,was appointed governor of the Federal Re-serve Bank of Boston, and assumed theduties of the position on January 15.
TREASURY FINANCE.
On January 9 Secretary Mellon offered forsubscription a new issue of 4J per cent Treas-ury notes dated January 15, 1923, and ma-turing on December 15, 1927. The amountoffered was 3300,000,000, or thereabouts, withthe right reserved by the Treasury to allotadditional notes to the extent that paymentwas to be tendered in unregistered war sav-ings certificates of the 1918 scries or in 4J percent Victory notes. At the time of the offer-ing there were still outstanding nearly S400,-000,000 of war savings certificates, whichhad matured on January 1 of the presentyear, and about $200,000,000 Victory notes,called for redemption on December 15 of lastyear, and the new offering was intended, withthe balances on hand, to provide for theredemption of these securities and also to coverthe Treasury's current cash requirements forthe period until March 15, the date of the firsttax installment. As there are no large pay-ments of interest on the public debt fallingdue in either January or February, and noadditional maturities of principal of the publicdebt until March 15, the Treasury expectsthat in the ordinary course of events the pro-ceeds of the new offering will be sufficient tomeet its current needs to that date.
Reports received from the Federal reservebanks show that the offering was oversub-scribed to the extent of 8281,550,800, so that theTreasury was able to make allotments in fullonly upon applications for smaller amountsand had to make reduced allotments uponapplications for larger amounts. All exchangesubscriptions were allotted ip. full, while allot-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 9: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
144 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
ments on other subscriptions were made on agraduated scale as follows: All subscriptionsup to amounts not exceeding $100,000 for anyone subscriber were allotted in full; sub-scriptions over $100,000 but not exceeding$500,000 were allotted 50 per cent, but notless than $100,000 on any one subscription;subscriptions over $500,000 but not exceeding$1,000,000 were allotted 40 per cent, but notless than $250,000 on any one subscription;subscriptions over $1,000,000 were allotted 25per cent, but not less than $400,000 on any onesubscription. Of the total allotments about$250,000,000 represent subscriptions in amountsof $100,000 or less, on which allotments havebeen made in full-
Amounts of subscriptions, and allotments,distributed by Federal reserve districts, areshown in the following table:
Treasury and Federal reserve districts.
Treasury . +BostonNew YorkrhiladelphiaCleveland..RichmondAtlanta *Chicago.....St. LouisMinneapolis.,...Kansas CityPallasSan Francisco
Total
Total sub-scriptionsreceived.
$53,90038,951,000
248,853,60065,440,20037,994,20023,521,10013,682,30065,856,20021,845,50014,855,3008,787,5009,425,600
42,254,400
581,550,800
Total sub-scriptionsallotted.
853.90032,151,000
131,412,00035,479,50023,319,20018,246,10010,046,30050,343,30017,893,10014,580,3006,285,9006,214,200
20,957,300
366,982,100
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 10: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
FEBBDABY, 1023. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 145
BUSINESS CONDITIONS IN THE UNITED STATES.Production and prices remained relatively constant in December, while trade and credit
showed the usual increases in the holiday season, followed by declines in January.Production.—The index of production in basic industries, after rising rapidly since last
August, showed a slight recession in December, though production was maintained at a levelnear the peak of 1920. The output of pig iron and coal continued to increase, but the produc-tion of certain other commodities, particularly of cotton textiles and flour, showed declines.In southern districts the building industry continued active, and in all parts of the country muchnew construction was projected.
Railroad traffic continued heavier than a year ago, though the seasonal decline in carloadings and the reduction in bad-order cars partially relieved freight congestion.
Employment in industrial establishments made a further advance in December, accom-panied by wage increases in certain industries* Some shortage of labor in the eastern districtswas still reported, but in Pacific States a substantial surplus of unskilled labor was indicated.
Wholesale prices,—The general level of wholesale prices remained unchanged in December.Among various groups of commodities the price tendencies of recent months were continued.The prices of farm products, cloth, chemicals, and house furnishings registered further in-creases, while fuel and metal prices continued to decline.
During January a number of basic commodities advanced in price, and cotton, rubber, andlead rose to the highest points since 1920.
Trade.—Wholesale trade in most reporting lines showed a seasonal decline in December,but was considerably larger than a year ago. Farm implement dealers, however, reportedlarger sales than in November, and more than doubled their December, 1921, business. Retailsales of reporting stores during December reached the largest volume in the last 4 years.
INDEX OF PRODUCTION IN BASIC INDUSTRIESCOMBINATION OF 22 INDIVIDUAL SERIES
CORRECTED FOR SEASONAL VARIATIONPER CENT ( J3W = WO ) PER CENT
140
120
too
80
60
40
20
o
\ A)vv \
\ y
rAT
LATtST ftGUREPECEnerR
1919 1920 1921 1922 1923
l b U
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
PRICESINDEX NUMBERS OF WHOLESALE PRICES
U. S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICSPERCENT (1313'100 BASE ADOPTED BYBUREAU) PERCENT300
250
COO
150
100
50
o
\
V
LATtST f IGUntDECEMBER
1919 1920 1921 1922 1923
00
50
ZOO
50
100
50
o
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 11: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
146 RESERVE FEBRUAHT, 1923.
BANK CREDIT800 MEMBER BANKS IN LEADING CITIES
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS16
14
BILLIONS Of DOLLARS16
DEMANDDEPOSITS/*
TIMEDEPOSITS^ ,
'*•„ LOANS Ah\ DlSCOUi
mvEsn
«• • -
fDNTS
i
ENTS**""**
LATEST FIG JRE JAN. tO
10
1919 1920 1921 1922 1923
BANK CREDITALL FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS40OOI
3500
3000
ZSOOfl
2000
1500
1000
500
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS14-000
3000
LATEST FIGURE JAN.17
2000
1500
500
1919 1920 1921 1922 1923
Bank credit.—Dividend and interest payments and the disbursement of Government fundsin connection with the redemption of Victory notes and war savings certificates, together withthe usual decline in the demand for currency after the holiday season, were attended by a largeincrease in the volume of new security issues and by somewhat easier money conditions.Open-market commercial paper rates in financial centers which were 4£ to 4f per cent in Decem-ber declined to 4J to 4£ per cent in January.
Member banks in leading cities reported an increase in demand deposits, an importantfactor in which was the usual seasonal flow of, funds from country districts to financial centers.While the volume of loans on stocks and.bonds decreased in the first two weeks in January,there was a somewhat larger increase in the investments owned by the tanks.
• At the Federal reserve banks the principal change between December 20 and January 24was a reduction of $235,000,000 in Federal reserve note circulation caused by the seasonaldecline in currency reqirements. Reserves increased $65,000,000, while earning assets declined$171,000,000. These changes are similar to developments during the same period a year ago,although the decline in earning assets was less than last year.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 12: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
FEBBUAKY, 1023. FEDERAL RESEltVE BULLETIN. 147
AGRICULTURE.
General improvement during 1922 in thefinancial conditions of agricultural producers,due chiefly to larger crops and higher pricesthan in 1921, was the outstanding factor inagricultural sections of the country. In alldistricts preparations for the new crop are evi-dent and in some considerable progress is indi-cated. Several districts, No. 8 (St. Louis), No.10 (Kansas City), and No. 11 (Dallas), have hadmuch dry weather during the winter months,which has slightly delayed progress in the de-velopment of winter wheat, while in othersopen and mild weather has permitted more falland winter plowing than usual. In districtNo. 8 (St. Louis) some corn still remainsshocked in the fields, but the general rule is thathusking has been completed and the crophoused. There is a heavy demand for corn forfeeding purposes, but the movement to marketcontinues in limited volume. The marketingof white potatoes in district No. 9 (Minneapolis)has been retarded by the unsatisfactory priceoffered to the producers and a shortage of suit-able cars. Rice threshing in district No. 8(St. Louis) was completed, early in December,and the final estimate on yield is about 88.7 percent of normal. Prices have advanced re-cently and vary from 75 cents to $1.25 perbushel. District No. 6 (Atlanta) reports thatthe rice production of Louisiana is 19,980,000bushels, an increase of 2,700,000 bushels over1921. The production of sugar in Louisiana in1922 was 482,752,000 pounds, compared with648,861,430 pounds in 1921.Grain movement.
Receipts of grain at 17 interior centers weregreater during December than in November orDecember, 1921. Receipts of wheat approxi-mated 47,700,000 bushels, an increase of23,000,000 over December, 1921, and 3,921,000over November. Corn receipts were 36,901,000bushels, compared with 24,022,000 in Novem-ber and 41,731,000 in December, 1921. Re-ceipts of oats were slightly smaller than m No-vember but exceeded the December, 1921,total by 7,621,000 bushels, or approximately 52per cent. The movement of rye was similar, asthe December receipts were less than thoseduring November and considerably greaterthan receipts for December, 1921. Barleyshowed increases over both November and tiiecorresponding period one year ago.Cotton.
Prior to January 16, 9,652,601 running balesof cotton were ginned, while the final estimate
was 9,964,000 bales. This is the second"short" cotton crop in two successive years,and as a result the total .visible supply ofcotton on January 19 was 5,125,933 bales,compared with 6,435,617 at the correspondingdate in 1922 and 6,590,358 in 1921. The priceof middling upland cotton at New Orleans was27.13 cents on January 16, as compared with26 cents on December 20 and 25.87 cents onNovember 15. The gradual increase in theprice of cotton has induced plans for increasedacreage in 1923 and for renewed and greaterattacks on the boll weevil. Stocks on hand atmills and public warehouses on December 31were 5,996,000 bales, compared with 5,919,000bales on November 30 and 6,945,000 bales onDecember 31, 1921. Exports were less duringDecember than for the preceding month orDecember, 1921.Tobacco.
Weather in December in district No. 5(Richmond) and district No. 8 (St. Louis) wasfavorable for the marketing of tobacco, andas a result increased movement was noted dur-ing the month. Average monthly prices werehigher and the quality of tobacco sold wasbetter than in December, 1921. The averagemonthly price reported from 69 markets inNorth Carolina was 328.24 per hundred pounds,compared with $23.72 during December, 1921.The total sales by farmers in the NorthCarolina and Virginia markets to January 1were 341,294,896 pounds. The Governmentestimate of tobacco in North Carolina was306,900,000 pounds, and as 241,294,896 poundswere sold to January 1 there remains approxi-mately 65,703,000 pounds to be sold, about 21per cent of the total crop. The movement inthe burley and dark tobacco sections of districtNo. 8 (St. Louis) is reported to be in "fullswing" and prices realized to date have beensatisfactory to growers.
Cigar manufacturers in district No. 3 (Phila-delphia) report an unusually strong demand forcigars for this season of the year. All manu-facturers indicate that demand is considerablybetter than it was a year ago and factories areoperating at about 90 per cent of capacity.Many factories still have some unfilled ordersfrom 1922, while others are placing theirsurplus production in stocks. Prices for cigarsare holding firm and reports indicate that pricelists are unchanged. Prices for leaf tobacco,in general, are firm, although some slightreductions are evident in certain grades ofdomestic wrapper. Strong demand for fillersand binders has caused an increase in the price
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 13: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
148 FEDERAL BESEEVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
on these grades. Increased prices are alsoindicated for good grades of tooacco from theWest Indies.Fruit.
Although the shipments of citrus fruit fromFlorida for December were slightly smallerthan shipments during December, 1921, thetotal shipments for the season ending Decem-ber 31, 1922, were greater than the season'stotal for the corresponding period a year ago.Despite the serious drought that was evident inFlorida last spring, the indications are that thecommercial movement of fruit this season willexceed that of any other year. Too much rainand too little cool weather have retarded theprogress of shipping to a small extent, butshipments prior to January 1 amounted to15,000 cars, containing approximately5,400,000 boxes. In district No. 12 (San Fran-cisco) shipments of deciduous fruits duringDecember were 4,290 cars, as compared with3,584 cars in December, 1921. Shipments oforanges were in excess of shipments for thecorresponding period in 1921, but lemon ship-ments, due to a shortage in the crop, were 119cars less than in December, 1921. The move-ment of apples to market was considerably re-tarded, as only 8,229 cars were shipped, com-pared to 18,740 cars in November.
Live stock.
Estimates of the Department of Agricultureindicate that the number of all live stock onfarms and ranges is 191,344,000. An increaseover the same period a year ago is indicated forall classes except horses, where a small declineof 203,000 is noted. The total value on Janu-ary 1, 1923, of all live stock was $5,111,256,000,as compared with $4,799,170,000 on the samedate one year ago, an increase of $312,086,000,or 6.5 per cent.
Conditions affecting the live-stock industryvaried considerably tnroughout districts No. 10(Kansas City) and No. 11 (Dallas). In thewestern portion of Wyoming storms werefrequent and heavy feeding was necessary.The temperatures, which were considerablyabove normal in spme sections of the district,caused rapid melting of snows, winch in turnopened the lower ranges throughout Colorado.In New Mexico the lack of precipitation wasadverse to both stock and range, causing theranges to become barren and the stock tobecome thin and unable to withstand severeweather. However, in spite of the unfavorableinfluences affecting the industry at the be-ginning of 1923, the general condition showed
a marked improvement over one year ago, andgreater confidence was expressed by growers aswell as by feeders, with a favorable outlook forall classes of live stock. The movement of livestock as represented by arrivals to six leadingmarkets in the Kansas City district during the12 months was 22,737,071 head, the highestfigure since 1919. Receipts amounted to5,839,085 cattle, the largest number since 1919;972,516 calves, the largest in market history;and 9,023,235 hogs, the greatest number since1919. Receipts of sheep fell below the totalarriving at tne markets in 1921. In districtNo. 11 (Dallas) some of the ranges deteriorated,due to dry weather. With the exception ofsoutheastern Arizona, no rains of any con-sequence came to any range country since earlyin December. Feeding has been necessary,but in many sections where feed is not acces-sible live stock have been weakened. Receiptsof live stock in the principal markets showedthe usual falling off as compared to November,but generally exceeded the volume received inDecember, 1921. Sheep receipts, however, weremuch smaller than in December, 1921.
MINING.Coal.
Coal production showed a steady expansionfrom August to December, but has beenslightly curtailed in January. Bituminousmines produced 46,450,000 tons in December,as compared with 45,262,000 tons in Novemberand 30,975,000 tons in December, 1921. Thechief limiting factor in the production of softcoal continues to be a shortage of shippingfacilities, although many western mines alsoreport "no market" for their output. Pricesof many grades of bituminous coal registered asharp upward movement in the last week ofDecember and first week of January. DistrictNo. 3 (Philadelphia) attributes this improve-ment in demand to large orders from steel com-panies, public utilities, and railroads. Retaildealers are also buying much bituminous coal,as there is an insufficient supply of anthracitefor householders7 consumption. Operators andminers from all parts of the country who metin conference at Chicago were unable to reachany agreement concerning wages, but negotia-tions were continued in the various fields.The United States Coal Commission recom-mended in a telegram to the Chicago confer-ence that the present wage agreement be con-tinued until April 1, 1924, if no other satisfac-tory settlement could be reached. The com-mission stated that this extension would allowtime for them to make a full report and for
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 14: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 149
Congress to take action on the facts presented.On January 24 representatives of operators andminers from the fields of Illinois, Indiana, andnorthern Ohio signed an agreement along thelines suggested by the coal commission con-tinuing the present wage scale to April 1, 1924,and provided for another conference not laterthan January 8, 1924.
Anthracite production in December waslarger than in the corresponding month of anyprevious year. Mine output totaled 8,430,000tons as compared with 8,385,000 tons in Novem-ber and 6,203,000 tons in December, 1921. Pro-duction continued at about this same rateduring the first three weeks of January, due toinsistent demand from consumers. Despitethe large output of anthracite coal during thepast four months, the supply is still insuffi-cient to meet householders' demands, with theresult that coke and bituminous coal have beenwidely used as substitutes. There have beenfew price changes in domestic sizes, but steamsizes show a distinct upward trend. Operat-ing conditions at mines are quite satisfactory,as the supply of labor is reasonably adequateand car movements are more prompt.
The demand for coke for domestic use andthe expansion of the iron industry has resultedin a further increase of prices, in spite of thelarge volume of manufacture. By-productand beehive ovens increased their output 4.7per cent and 8.3 per cent, respectively, inDecember, and weekly reports for Januaryshowed continued expansion in the Connells-ville district.Petroleum.
Increased production, accompanied by in-creased stocks, again characterized the pe-troleum industry during December. The aver-age daily output during that month totaled1,617,000 barrels, to be compared with 1,-596,000 barrels in November. Production forthe year totaled 551,152,000 barrels, an in-crease of 17 per cent over the 1921 output.Stocks at the end of the year fell off slightlyfrom the high point reached in December.Consumption of crude oil in the United Statesexceeds domestic output, but an excess ofimports has resulted in the continued accumu-lation of stocks. Recently an increase in con-sumption has resulted in a lowering of theestimated number of days' supply on hand.Reports indicate that daily average crude oilproduction increased further during the earlypart of January.
In all States of district No. 10 (Kansas City)output was larger during December than dur-
30425—23 2
ing the preceding month, but there was a de-cline in the number of new wells completedfrom 714 in November to 597 in December*At the close of the year 2,312 rigs and wellswere drilling in Oklahoma, Kansas, and Wyo-ming, as compared with 2,307 on the last dayof November and 2,366 at the close of 1921. Indistrict No. 11 (Dallas) the production of crudeoil increased in December, .reflecting greaterdrilling activity. The increase was due chieflyto the influence of a few of the Texas fields, usin many parts of Texas and in Louisiana pro-duction fell off slightly during December,Completion of new wells in the Dallas districtfor December totaled 509. For the seventhconsecutive month, production of crude pe-troleum in district No. 12 (San Francisco) wasgreater than in the preceding month.
Advances in the price of crude oil were an-nounced during January by producers in theMid-Continent fields and later in the Wyomingand Central States fields. On December 30quotations on many grades of eastern crudewere raised 25 cents a barrel, and on January23 Mexia crude was advanced 25 cents a barrel,following an increase of 20 cents on Decem-ber 28.Metals.
Copper production exceeded 100,000,000pounds in each of the last three months of 1922and reached the maximum for the year inDecember. The December output of mineswas 103,845,000 pounds, which was 1 per centmore than in November and 43 per cent morethan in December, 192L The copper marketcontinued to be strong during the past month,despite the large production. The price ofrefined electrolytic copper delivered at NewYork rose from 14.625 cents on December 19to 14.75 cents on December 22. The quotationcontinued at 14.75 cents until January 15, whenit was reduced to 14.625 cents as a result of thetense situation in Europe and the curtailmentof English purchases. Two years ago therewas a stock of over 1,000,000,000 pounds ofmarketable* copper in the United States. Thishas now been reduced to a very small reserve,and current consumption is still reported to bein excess of production. Mills manufacturingwire, brass, and sheet copper are operating on alarge scale, and domestic demand is very heavy.
The price of lead at New York has advancedsteadily from 4.70 cents in March, 1922, to 7.60cents on January 17, 1923. This increase inprices has been Sue to the fact that the threechief lead-consuming industries—pabit, storagebatteries, arid cables—have all been extremely
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 15: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
150 FEDEEAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
active during the last six months. Lead pro-duction decreased 5.9 per cent in December,but was 3.2 per cent larger than in December,1921. Zinc production, on the other hand,increased 6.6 per cent in December andamounted to 42,841 tons. Zinc stocks werereduced by 1,245 tons during December andare less than two weeks' supply at the currentrate of consumption. Zinc prices at St. Louisdeclined from 7.05 cents per pound on Decem-ber 21 to 6.70 cents per pound on January 17,due to disinclination on the part of galvanizersto contract ahead. Foreign buying, however,continued to be large during January. Ship-ments of both lead and zinc ores irom themines of district No. 10 (Kansas City) wereexceptionally heavy during December, exceed-ing those of any other month of 1922.
Silver production in December totaled5,052,000 ounces, which was 4 per cent largerthan in November and 30 per cent larger thanin December, 1921. Purchases under thePittman Act to the end of 1922 aggregatedabout 150,750,000 ounces out of a total of208,000,000 ounces to be purchased.
MANUFACTURES.Food products.
Wheat-flour production during Decemberwas 11,041,000 barrels, compared with13,424,000 barrels in November and 8,856,000barrels in December, 1921. Although thedecrease in December was due in part to theholiday curtailment of operations, the totalproduction for 1922 shows an increase of4,371,000 barrels over 1921. Production offlour in district No. 10 (Kansas City) was1,822,342 barrels, which was a decrease of only9 per cent as compared with November, whilethe decrease in district No. 7 (Chicago) was 24per cent, the greatest decrease in any reportingdistrict. Domestic and foreign demand wereboth slack. Sales to domestic trade weremade largely in small lots and for promptshipment. Sales, in barrels, at* ten mills indistrict No. 7 (Chicago) decreased 17 per centduring December, while dollar sales decreased13 per cent. Little export demand was re-ported. # In district No. 9 (Minneapolis) theproduction of flour was almost one-third largerthan in December, 1921, but was smaller thanm November, 1922.
Forty-seven meat packing companies in dis-trict No. 7 (Chicago) report a slight seasonaldecline in dollar sales during December, butsales were 17 per cent higher than in Decem-ber, 1921. Average prices for live stock forslaughter during the first half of January were
slightly higher, with the exception of lambs,than prices in December, Receipts and slaugh-ter of cattle, calves, and sheep declined, com-pared with November, while hogs increased.Similar conditions were reported from districtNo. 10 (Kansas City). Packing operations atsix leading markets during December and theyear 1922 showed marked increases over theoperations of the corresponding month andthe 12-month period in 1921. The totalslaughter of meat animals at six markets was13,699,123 during 1922, as compared with12,792,870 during 1921. There were increasesof 13 per cent in the slaughter of cattle, of 21per cent in the slaughter of calves, and of 18per cent in the slaughter of hogs, while theslaughter of sheep decreased 16 per cent.Reports indicate that the operations of thepacking industry are practically back to nor-mal conditions. Domestic and foreign demandare reported to be fairly good. Domestictrade in meats has been stabilized and the con-sumption of meat is increasing. A greatervolume of products for export was reportedfrom district No. 7 (Chicago) than in Novem-ber, while district No. 10 (Kansas City) indi-cates that exports are greater than in pre-waryears but still less than in 1916 to 1919.
Textiles.Allowing for seasonal variations incident
to the holiday and stock-taking periods,the demand for cotton textiles was consideredto be satisfactory during December and earlyJanuary, Consumption of raw cotton bymills during December was 527,945 bales,having declined 9 per cent from the highpoint attained during November. On theother hand, a few more spindles were activeduring December. Orders recently placedfor yarns in district No. 3 (Philadelphia)largely called for delivery in March and April.A moderately active demand for staple cotton;oods, according to reports from the Phila-ielphia district, accompanied the recent
strengthening of quotations^ Mills in districtNo. 5 (Richmond) are enjoying a high degreeof prosperity. Yarn manufacturers in dis-trict No. 6 (Atlanta) report decreases inoutput during December as compared withNovember and with December, 1921, butunfilled orders were double those of a yearago. ^ Cloth manufacturers in the Atlantadistrict produced and shipped a considerablylarger volume of goods than they did inDecember, 1921, and had 50 per cent moreorders on their books. Reports from finishersof cotton fabrics throughout the country
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 16: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL, BESERVE BULLETIN. 151
indicate slight decreases in productive activityand in new orders booked as compared withNovember, with an increase in shipmentsof finished goods.
Interest in the woolen industry in Januarywas chiefly centered around the openingsof fall lines during the latter part of thatmonth. Prices were advanced in varyingdegrees upon most lines, and the averageincrease in the quotations on men's wearlines by the largest producer was about16 per cent over those of a year ago. Fultonserge (10^-11 ounce), which is customarilyregarded as an indicator, was priced at $2.67£per yard, compared with 82.42\ at the fall,1921, opening, with $2.35 a year ago, $2.50last July at the spring opening, and with$2.80 in October after a series of increaseshad been made. Advances of women's wearlines ranged from 1.3 per cent to 11.6 percent above last year's quotations. DuringDecember and January there was a fairlygood demand for spring fabrics, accordingto reports from district No. 3 (Philadelphia).Cloth mills in that district are operating at80 per cent of capacity, and spinners wereable to maintain a high rate of productionduring January because of the quantity oforders booked for delivery within the nextfour months. The carpet and rug industrycontinued maximum operations. The raw-wool market experienced seasonal dullnessduring the latter part of December and earlyJanuary in districts No. 1 (Boston), No. 3(Philadelphia), and No. 7 (Chicago), butprices remained firm. The statistical positionof raw wool is strong now, as good wools arescarce and consumption is large. Statisticsof active machinery indicate increased pro-duction during December. Wide looms were81.1 per cent active, woolen spindles 84.5 percent, and worsted spindles 89.2 per cent. Con-sumption of raw wool, on the other hand, was8 per cent less than in November.
Seasonal conditions, according to district No.3 (Philadelphia), curtailed orders for broad silksbetween December 15 and January 15, butlater the demand was revived. Deliveries ofraw silk to American mills were reduced duringDecember from the November figure, but con-tinued to be relatively large, exceeding thoseof December, 1921, by nearly 50 per cent.Loom operations continued active duringDecember and early January, according toreports from manufacturers in district No. 3(Philadelphia) and statistics from mills inPaterson and North Hudson. Activity in these
two centers on January 13 was at the rate of54 per cent and 62 per cent of capacity, respec-tively, as compared with 24 and 49 per cent ayear ago. Quotations on raw silk advancedsharply early in the year.
Further seasonal recessions during Decemberwere reported by clothing wholesalers indistrict No. 2 (New York) and by tailors to thetrade in district No. 7 (Chicago), but 23 clothingfirms in district No. S (St. Louis) reported aslight increase in sales as compared withNovember. In all of these districts businesswas much better than during December, 1921,sales of women's clothing in the New Yorkdistrict showing the largo increase of 71 percent. Clothing manufacturers in district No. 3(Philadelphia) have found the demand for
spring lines of men's wear to be good, and ordershave been received in sufficient quantityto permit production approaching capacity*Spring suits are priced from 10 to 20 per centhigher than in 1922. Advance orders forspring in the St. Louis district were generallyheavier than last season.
Underwear production declined 25 per centduring December, according to comparativestatistics for November and December from37 mills. Shipments also fell off, but moreorders were received, leaving a larger volume ofunfilled orders on hand at the end of the month.Production of winter underwear showed aseasonal decline, whereas the output of summergarments increased. Reports from firms indistrict No. 3 (Philadelphia) show similar tend-encies. Orders are now being booked forwinter garments and shipments are light; onthe other hand, in the case of summer under-wear, the buying season has ended and deliv-eries have begun. All statistics of winterunderwear in the Philadelphia district showedsubstantial increases as compared with Decem-ber, 1921, whereas in the case of the light-weight products business has been relativelyquieter.
Declines occurred in business done by hosierymanufacturers during December, and reportsfrom district No. 3 (Philadelphia) indicate thatthat industry has not fully shared the generalimprovement in manufacturing noted duringthe past few months. Different mills, however,report contrary tendencies. Statistics fur-nished by mills in the Philadelphia districtshow declines in production, orders, and ship-ments, with an increase in cancellations andstocks during December as compared withNovember. Orders, however, are materiallylarger than they were a year ago. In the
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 17: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
152 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN". FEBRUARY, 1923.
Atlanta district all items were smaller than inNovember, but showed substantial improve-ment as compared with December, 1921; thatis, orders, production, and shipments increased,while cancellations and stocks were smaller.
Iron and steel.Demand for iron and steel products continues
to be very strong, and factory operations areon as large a scale as the labor supply permits.Pig-iron production amounted to 3,087,000 tonsin December, an increase of 8.3 per cent, whilesteel-ingot output declined 3.8 per cent to atotal of 2,780,000 tons. Prices renewed theirupward movement in January, after decliningfor 3 months. Advances were registered bothin pig-iron and finished steel prices. Unfilledorders of the United States Steel Corporationdecreased 1.4 per cent during December andtotaled 6,746,000 tons at the end of the year.Particularly large orders have been placed byfarm-implement manufacturers, railroads, andautomobile factories since the beginning of1923, and wire mills have been obliged to allo-cate their output for the first quarter of theyear.
District No. 4 (Cleveland) reports that thegeneral rate of production of steel mills is 85per cent of capacity and that there is little pros-pect of increasing operations on account of theshortage of common labor. As a result of thelarge accumulation of business at westernplants, a considerable amount of tonnage hasbeen diverted to eastern mills. In districtNo. 3 (Philadelphia) mill operations are esti-mated to average 80 per cent of capacity.Manufacturers are somewhat hindered by ashortage of labor and by delays in railroadshipments of both raw materials and finishedproducts. Manufacturers of iron bars andsteel plates are receiving especially large ordersfrom railroads, automobile manufacturers, andmines. Structural steel, forgings, wire rope,and machinery are also in good demand.Automobiles.
Production of automobiles was only slightlycurtailed in December and was almost threetimes as large as a year ago. Passenger-caroutput totaled 207,501, as compared with215,225 in November and 70,435 in December,1921; while the number of trucks producedwas 19,640, as compared with 21,291 in Novem-ber and 8,183 in December, 1921. Shipmentsfrom factories in December were also muchlarger than in the corresponding month of1921, and driveaways were more numerous thanin November. Both production and ship-
ments indicate that the large demand forclosed cars has greatly increased winter salesand has substantially modified the seasonaltrend in the industry. Demand this fall andwinter has been well sustained, with consider-able acceleration in January from the variousautomobile shows. Sales of trucks in urbandistricts have been particularly large, due toactivity in building, manufacturing, and trade.Seven leading manufacturers of automobileshave announced an aggregate production sched-ule of 1,750,000 cars for 1923. Rubber com-panies announce that demand from dealers hasbeen much strengthened as a result of the newdating plan by which dealers are furnished withtires during December, January, and Februaryfor which payments are not due until thespring.Leather and shoes.
Greater activity characterized the marketsfor hides and skins in districts No. 3 (Phila-delphia) and No, 7 (Chicago) during Decemberand the early part of January. Prices wereslightly lower in both markets the first weekin January and large sales were transactedin Chicago. Quotations were later raisedto the December levels. December pricesof green hides and skins were considerablyhigher than those prevailing a year ago.
Leather sales in district No. 7 (Chicago)were less in December than in November,except in the case of belting and harnessleather. Reports from district No. 3 (Phila-delphia) indicate that sales of all leathersduring January increased as the month pro-gressed. Prices of heavy and upper leatherswere on the whole well maintained. Soleleather production in the United States fellfrom 1,482,074 sides in November to 1,425,512in December, and was about 19 per cent lessthan during December, 1921.
Seasonal recessions were noted in the pro-duction and shipments of shoes during Decem-ber by reporting firms in districts No. 1(Boston), No. 3 (Philadelphia), and No. 7(Chicago), and production figures for thecountry as a whole show-the same tendency.Orders were larger in the Boston district,but in the other districts they were less thanin November. As compared with December,1921, production and snipments by firms indistrict No. 1 (Boston) fell off, but in theChicago and Philadelphia districts all itemsshowed substantial increases. In district No.3 (Philadelphia) shoe manufacturers receiveda fair volume of business during January,some firms having booked all the orders t h y
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 18: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923, FEDERAL KESERVE BULLETIN. 153
can fill for the Easter season. Shoe manu-facturers in district No. 8 (St. Louis) wereoperating their plants at from 90 to 100 percent of capacity early in January, and advanceorders were being booked in a larger volumethan at the same time a year ago. Whole-sale shoe dealers reported that Decembersales were smaller than those for Novemberin all districts except No. 8 (St Louis.), butretail sales as reported by 30 firms in districtNo. 3 (Philadelphia) exceeded November figuresby 21 per cent and those of last Decemberby 7 per cent. Stocks were 9 per cent smallerthan either a month or a year previous, andthe rate of turnover for the half-year exceededthat of the same period in 1921.Paper.
Contrary to the usual seasonal trend, pro-duction of newsprint fell off 7 per cent inDecember to 119,404 tons, the lowest figure forany month since April. Shipments also de-clined to about the same extent, but remainedslightly larger than output, and as a resultstocks on hand decreased further. Newsprintproduction for 1922 totaled 1,447,688 tons, 18per cent above the aggregate for 1921 and 4per cent below that for 1920, the best year onrecord. Declines occurred in the total pro-duction and' shipments of all grades of paperduring November, the latest month for whichstatistics are available, but activity continuedat a relatively high rate. Contrary to thegeneral tendency, the production of book paperand paper board increased during Novemberto the largest totals attained in over two years.Production of wood pulp in November exceededthat of any other month since June, but con-sumption fell off.
Seasonal slackening in the demand for paperwas noted during January by producers in dis-trict No. 3 (Philadelphia), but orders are muchgreater than they were a year ago, and mills arerunning at close to capacity. Prices in generalare firm, and quotations on paper board haveadvanced 10 per cent since December. Thedemand for paper boxes in the Philadelphiadistrict was fairly good in January. Whole-salers in district No. 7 (Chicago) report thatDecember sales exceeded those of November.Inventories were larger than at the beginningof the year. Production of boxes m theChicago district was 60 per cent larger than inDecember, 1921. The fine paper business indistrict No. 4 (Cleveland) fell off somewhatafter the first of December, but this is consid-ered to be largely seasonal. Stocks of pulpheld by both pulp and paper manufacturers inthe Cleveland district are reported to be large.
Lumber.
Lumber movement during December andearly January was featured by an excess oforders booked and shipments over the amountcut. Production, although large for this timeof the year, was necessarily curtailed becauseof winter weather, and shipments which usuallyexceed the cut at this season were particularly-heavy because improved transportation facili-ties enabled many delayed shipments to boforwarded. Furthermore, dealers are prepar-ing for spring demands by building up stocksand by placing orders for future delivery.
The above developments are reflected instatistics published by the various associations.Production by 583 mills reporting to theNational Lumber Manufacturers Associationtotaled 1,103,194,000 feet in December, a de-crease of 11 per cent from the November figureand an increase of 68 per cent above the cut forDecember, 1921. Shipments from these millsaggregated 1,280,660,000 feet. Mills of theSouthern Pine Association in districts No. 6(Atlanta) and No. 11 (Dallas) reported anincrease in orders received during December ascompared with November, with a slight de-cline in shipments and a greater decline in pro-duction and stocks. Orders received, snip-ments, and orders on hand at the end of themonth all exceeded production. All items wereconsiderably larger than the correspondingfigures for December, 1921. Similar conditionswere found among reporting manufacturers indistricts No. 9 (Minneapolis) and No. 12 (SanFrancisco), except that in some cases stockswere smaller than they were a year ago. Re-ports from retailers in the Minneapolis districtshow that sales during December were only 40per cent of November sales but exceeded tnoseof last December. Stocks on hand were smallerthan they were either a month or a year pre-vious. Purchases by domestic and foreignbuyers in district No. 12 (San Francisco) wereunusually heavy during December and a largevolume of cargo business was transacted.
BUILDING.
Construction was somewhat curtailed in thenorthern districts during December and Janu-ary, as a result of severe snow storms^ On theother hand, operations have actually increasedin many sections of the South. The total valueof contracts awarded in seven Federal reservedistricts (compiled from statistics gathered bythe F. W. Dodge Go. for 27 northeastern States)aggregated §191,263,069 during December,wLich was 13 per cent less than in Novemberand 4 per cent greater than in December, 1921.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 19: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
154 FEDERAL BESERVE BULLETIN. FEBHUARI', 1923.
The value of contracts decreased from Novem-ber in the Boston, New York, Cleveland, Rich-mond, and Chicago districts, the reductionsvarying from 0.7 per cent in district No. 7 (Chi-cago) to 24 per cent in district No. 2 (NewYork). Districts No. 3 (Philadelphia) and No.9 (Minneapolis) each reported an increase ofabout 10 per cent in December contracts. Thegain in contracts let as compared with a yeara»o was entirely due to large increases in theChicago, Cleveland, and Phfladelphia districts,as new operations in the four other reportingdistricts were slightly smaller. The value oresidential contracts awarded decreased from5117,514,900 in November to $111,278,491 inDecember, although increases were reportedfrom the Cleveland, Philadelphia, and Bostondistricts. Permit statistics for December,which are published on page 242, show thatthere was a considerable increase in numberand value of new projects in the Atlanta, St.Louis, and Dallas Federal reserve districts, forwhich contract figures are not available.
The average level of building material priceswas unchanged in December. Prices of build-ing materials, however, are now 85 per centabove the average for 1913, whereas the indexfor all groups published by the Bureau of LaborStatistics nas only increased 56 per cent.Shipments of cement showed a marked reduc-tion in December, but were slightly larger thanin December^ 1921. Production of cement andof various kinds of brick was moderately cur-tailed, as is customary in the early winter.
TRANSPORTATION.
The railroads made substantial progress inthe elimination of traffic congestion duringDecember and the first week of January. Theaverage car shortage in the week ending Janu-ary 8 was 73,285, as compared with 133,786cars m the last week of November and 179,239cars in the last week of October. The short-age of box cars has been reduced 66 per centsince the last week of October, while the short-age of coal cars has only been reduced 28 percent. The comparative slowness in relievingthe coal situation is due to the accumulated de-mand for coal, the difficulty in expediting ship-ments at certain mines on account of insuffi-cient trackage, and the shortage of locomotiveson some coal roads due to the prolongation oflabor difficulties.
The American Railway Association reportsthat car loadings of all important groups ofcommodities except coal were larger in 1922than m any previous year, being 16 per cent
greater than in 1921 and 3.5 per cent largerthan in 1920. Loadings of coal were curtailedby the miners' strike, but amounted to 93 percent of the 1921 total and 69 per cent of thetotal for 1920. In December there was a totalof about 3,635,000 cars loaded, which was 11per cent less than in November, but 20 per centmore than in December. 1921. Loadings de-creased in all operating regions and for all com-modity groups except coke. The most impor-tant reduction was m the loadings of miscella-neous merchandise freight.
The supply of available railroad equipmentwas increased during December by a furtherreduction in the number of bad-order cars andby large shipments from locomotive and carfactories. The number of freight cars awaitingrepairs was reduced from 226,288 on December1 to 216,011 on January L The output of newlocomotives in December totaled 210, as com-pared with 159 in November, while unfilledorders decreased from 1,619 to 1,592.
TRADE.Wholesale trade.
Wholesale trade declined somewhat in De-cember, as is customary at the close of thevear. The volume of sales, however, waslarger than in December, 1921. Farm im-plements were the only reporting line whichshowed considerable increases as comparedwith November and had very much largersales than in the corresponding month ayear ago. These increases in implement salesover December, 1921, amounted to 194 percent in the Minneapolis district, 159 per centin the Dallas district, 115 per cent in tne Kan-sas City district, 41 per cent in the Atlantadistrict, and 28 per cent in the San Franciscodistrict. Dry-goods dealers reported thelargest decreases in sales during December, thesedecreases ranging from 12 per cent in districtNo. 4 (Cleveland) to 44 per cent in districtNo. 11 (Dallas). Large declines were also re-ported in the sales of boots and shoes in theRichmond, Atlanta, and Minneapolis districts,but an increase of 20 per cent over Novemberwas reported by nine wholesale shoe firms inthe St. Louis district. Sales of grocery firmsdeclined in all Federal reserve districts, thereductions being larger in the West than inthe South and East. Hardware sales werealso somewhat smaller than in November inmost reporting districts, but averaged over 20per cent larger than in December, 1921. Thetable on page 246 gives detailed figures ofwholesale trade,
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 20: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 155
Retail trade*Retail trade reached record volume during
December as a result of the Christmas buying.Sales in all Federal reserve districts exceptNo. 11 (Dallas), where a slight decline of 1per cent was noted, increased over December,192L Increases, compared with December,1921, ranged from 4.7 per cent in district No. 1(Boston) to 16.1 per cent in district No. 7(Chicago)* Considerable activity was shown inthe Cleveland, Minneapolis, and San Franciscodistricts, as well as in the Chicago district. Theactivity in retail buying was reflected more insome lines than in others. In district No. 6(Atlanta) mild weather hampered the buyingof winter clothing and other articles incidentto cold weather. In district No. 5 (Richmond)several stores report that the month's businesswas the nest in their histories and as a resultstocks were reduced to a satisfactory level forinventory taking in January. Stocks of de-partment stores decreased during the monthin all districts from which reports were obtainedbut were larger than on the corresponding datein 1921 in districts No. 2 (New York) and No.5 (Richmond). Outstanding orders of depart-ment stores decreased in all districts exceptCleveland, Chicago, Minneapolis, and Dallas.
Sales of all reporting lines of chain storesincreased in December, and music stores,shoe stores, and 5 and 10 cent stores reportedthe largest monthly sales during the last fouryears. Mail-order sales were slightly smallerthan in November, but were substantiallylarger than in the corresponding month of theyears 1920 and 192L
PRICES.
Wholesale prices in the United States werevery stable during the month of December,the all-commodities index numbers of boththe Federal Reserve Board and the Bureauof Labor Statistics remaining unchanged—theformer at a level of 164 and the latter at 156.
Agricultural products showed only a slightincrease in December, following the extreme riseof the previous month. Bituminous coal, coke,and pig iron prices have been steadily decreas-ing during the last months of 1922, but anthra-cite prices have not yet turned downward. Theaverage monthly price of raw cotton remainedunchanged from the November average.
Structural steel and billets continued todecline, other steel products remaining steady.
Acetate of lime, after remaining unchanged inprice for a year and a half, began to increasem price in August, and lias continued to risemonthly. Cotton yarns have shown a steadyincrease throughout the year, and with therise in December stood 54 per cent higherthan in January, 1922. Worsted yarn pricesin December were only 18 per cent higher thanat the beginning of the year, but have alsoshown fairly steady advances throughout theyear. Producers' goods as a group declinedslightly in December. Consumers' goods in-creased, due to rises in the prices of staplefood products.
The various groups of the Bureau of LaborStatistics index moved as follows: Farm prod-ucts and cloths and clothing up 2 points;chemicals and drugs and house furnishinggoods up 3 points; foods up 1 point; fuel andlighting and metals and metal products clown2 points; while building materials and mis-cellaneous items remained unchanged.
COMMERCIAL FAILURES.
Commercial failures in the United Statesduring December, in accordance with theusual seasonal trend, exceeded the Novemberinsolvencies both in number and in totalliabilities involved. The number of failuresin seven districts and the liabilities in fivedistricts were, however, smaller than thecorresponding figures for November. As com-pared with December, 1921, the number offailures declined 26 per cent, and the liabilitieswere 41 per cent less. In every district thefailures were fewer by from 6 to 49 per cent,except in district No. 12 (San Francisco),where there was an increase of 44 per cent.The liabilities were larger than they were ayear previous in only four districts, the largestincrease being 98 per cent in district No. 5(Richmond). In the first three weeks ofJanuary the number of failures in the UnitedStates totaled 1,424, a reduction of 25 percent from the large total of 1,898 recoraedduring the corresponding period of 1922.
The liabilities involved in the 1922 insolven-cies were a fraction less than the record-breaking figures reached during 1921, but thenumber of failures in 1922, 23,676, exceededthe corresponding figure for all former years,topping the previous record of 1915 by 7 percent. Comparative figures by districts areshown in the table on page 219.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 21: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
156 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. , 1923.
EMPLOYMENT.
Employment at industrial establishmentscontinued to increase during December for theeighth consecutive month. The Bureau ofLabor Statistics reports that 3,294 establish-ments located in all parts of the United Statesemployed 1,587,708 workers in December,which was 2.4 per cent more than in November.Plants manufacturing pottery and agriculturalimplements made particularly large increases intheir forces, while the railroad equipment andmachine industries continued their recent ex-pansion. The most important decrease in em-ployment occurred in the fertilizer industry andamounted to about 11 per cent. There is stilla large demand for many kinds of skilled laborin all parts of the country, but a pronouncedsurplus of common labor has developed in dis-trict No. 12 (San Francisco). Fewer wage ad-justments were reported from November 15 toDecember 15 than in the three precedingmonths, but practically all adjustments wereincreases. The industries most affected bythese changes were machine shops and glassfactories.
Shortages of textile workers, shoe workers,machinists, and building mechanics are re-
Sorted from many New England cities. Laborifficulties in the granite industry have been
settled and quarries resumed operations onJanuary 2. The textile strike is at length com-pletely settled and a number of cotton andwoolen mills report overtime operations. TheNew York State Department of Labor an-nounces that the number of employees in re-porting establishments increased 1 per cent inDecember and was 15 per cent larger than inDecember, 1921. Gains occurred in the metaltrades, the wood manufacturing industries, theshoe factories, the printing establishments, andthe silk mills, while women's apparel shops, can-neries, candy factories, biscuit factories, andbrickyards reduced their forces. Railwayequipment factories added the greatest numberof workers to their pay rolls, whereas the men'sclothing industry recorded the largest percent-age gain. The Pennsylvania State Departmentof Labor reports that there was a slight increaseof unemployment in reporting cities of east-ern Pennsylvania during the month endingJanuary 15, despite substantial reductions atScranton and Reading. Railroad equipmentplants near Philadelphia are employing nightshifts, while many textile mills report a short-age of skilled workers. In district No. 4 (Cleve-
land) the pottery industry reports a scarcity ofworkers, and steel mills, garment manufacturers,and automotive factories are increasing thenumber on their pay rolls.
Cotton mills and coal mines in district No. 5(Richmond) increased their forces duringDecember. The surplus of clerical workers inWashington is increasing, due to further cur-tailments of the Government departments.In district No. 6 (Atlanta) manufacturers ofcotton goods, steel, lumber, tobacco, and paperhave added to the number of their employees.The supply of transient labor in Florida is stillin excess of the demand, although some arebeing employed in harvesting citrus fruits andvegetables.
District No. 7 (Chicago) states that there wasa decrease of 3.2 per cent in the number ofemployees of 183 reporting firms during Decem-ber, while the average pay per man declined2.9 per cent. Employment m the automobileand lumber industries is unusually large forthis season of the year. Packing plants andrailroads in district No. 8 (St. Louis) increasedtheir forces during December, and new con-struction operations continued to employlarge numbers. The surplus of farm labor, onthe other hand, became more pronounced inboth the St. Louis and Minneapolis districts.In district No. 9 (Minneapolis) there is anabundance of common labor due to the de-crease of farm and road work, but lumbercamps, flour mills, and steel mills continue toincrease their forces. Meat packers in variouscities of district No. 10 (Kansas City) areincreasing their forces, and wholesale dealershandling groceries, dry goods, furniture, drugs,and millinery are also adding to the number ontheir pay rolls. The demand for common laboris slack, but is being partially absorbed in ice cut-ting. Sugar factories in Colorado closed duringDecember, releasing several thousand workers.
Lumber mills, railroad shops, and oil com-panies in district No. 11 (Dallas) increased thenumber of their employees during December.Cotton-oil mills reduced their operations. Amoderate surplus of building .craftsmen hasdeveloped and common labor is in excess ofrequirements. The reduction of agriculturalactivities has resulted in a large surplus ofunskilled labor in district No. 12 (San Fran-cisco). Weather conditions have forced theclosing of lumber mills and construction campsin higher altitudes, adding to this surplus.The shipbuilding and steel industries are stillvery inactive in Oregon and Washington.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 22: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
FEBRUABY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 157
FOREIGN TRADE.
Following the increase in the value of ex-ports during last October and November to thehighest point reached since early in 1921, thefigures for December show a decline of nearly10 per cent—from $380,000,000 in Novemberto $344,000,000 in December. The latter figureis still in excess of that a year ago and is higheralso than for any month in 1922 previous toOctober. Taken altogether, therefore, thereports for the last 3 months of the year showdecided gains in our export trade* For the12 months ending with December, 1922, exportstotaled $3,832,000,000 as compared with$4,485,000,000 for 1921, the decrease beingdue to a fall in average unit values rather thanto a decline in quantities. Provisional importfigures are now available for October, and aregiven as approximately $319,000,000, which islarger than for any previous month sinceNovember, 1920. In the last 9 days of.Sep-tember, when the provisions of the new tarifflaw first became effective, imports are nowreported as having amounted to approximately869,000,000.
GOLD AND SILVER MOVEMENTS.
A further addition of $23,730,000 to the coun-try's monetary gold stock through net importsis shown for the month of December. Totalgold imports for the month amounted to$26,440,000. Of this total nearly 60 per centcame from England and about 20 per cent fromFrance, while Egypt and China together,ac-count for another 10 per cent of the total soldimports. About 60 per cent of the total ot$2,710,000 of gold exported was consigned toCanada, while smaller amounts, aggregatingover $1,000,000, were shipped to Mexico,China, and Hongkong.
Net gold imports for the year totaled$238,295,000, compared with $667,357,000 forthe year 1921. • Of the total gold imports forthe year; $275,170,000, about 44 per cent, camefrom Great Britain, about 22 per cent fromScandinavian countries, and about 10 per centfrom France and Netherlands. Gold broughtto the United States from Great Britain islargely of South African origin; gold comingfrom the Scandinavian countries and from
of the Netherlands was the gold shipped tothis country taken from the country's centralreserve. Substantial gold imports from theFar East, mainly China, are also noted, whileamong imports from Latin America those fromColombia and Central America are most im-portant. Of the total gold exports of $30,-875,000, about 60 per cent were directed toCanada, largely during the last quarter of theyear. British India, Mexico, and Hongkongcombined are credited with about one-third ofthe total gold exports for the year.
Silver imports for December, $7,S4S,000,came mainly from Mexico, Peru, and Canada,while silver exports for the-month, SO,913,000,were consigned to Great Britain, British India,and the China coast. Silver imports for thepast year totaled $70,807,000, compared with863,242,000 for the year 1921. Imports fromthe leading silver-producing countries, viz,Mexico, Canada, and Peru, were all on a largerscale than in 1921, indicating a larger worldoutput of silver for the year. Silver exportsfor the year totaled -802,807,000, comparedwith $51,575,000 in 1921. These exports areall of foreign silver, as the domestic productwas purchased by the Government for mone-tary use under the provisions of the PittmanAct. There remains to be purchased underthis act about 50,000,000 ounces, and Govern-ment buying of silver at the fixed SI rate islikely to continue during the greater part ofthe present year.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES.
Sterling exchange advanced during the firstpart of January to the peak rate of $4.68,which had been touched but once (December13, 1922) since 1919. On January 31 the ratehad receded to S4.64.
French and Belgian francs and Italian lireshowed a general downward trend and stoodat the end of the month at 5.S2, 5.12, and 4.70cents, respectively. This brings the Frenchfranc down to its post-war low figure recordedat the end of 1920. The German mark fellfrom 0.0139 cent on January 2 to 0.0021 centon January 31, or from about 7,000 to 50,000marks per dollar.
Neutral and South American exchanges re-France is linked with previous imports of Rus- proined fairly steady, while Shanghai taels andsian gold into these countries. Only in the case Indian rupees showed slight advances.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 23: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
158 FEDERAL EESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923,
RULINGS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD.Bankers' acceptance to finance purchase of gold.
The Federal Reserve Board was recentlyrequested to issue a ruling upon the questionwhether or not a draft drawn under the fol-lowing circumstances would be eligible foracceptance by a national bank.
A customer of a national bank desires topurchase gold for refining purposes and pro-poses to finance the purchase of such gold bymeans of bankers' acceptances drawn on andaccepted by a national bank. The gold will beshipped to the bank, which in turn will deliverit to its customer on a trust receipt. Theacceptances are to have a maturity of 30 daysin order to finance the customer during theperiod of manufacturing the gold into certaindental supplies. It is understood that thegold will be shipped through an express com-
r y and that no negotiable bill of lading willissued covering the shipment.
Section 13 of the Federal Reserve act pro-vides, in part, that—
Any member bank may accept drafts or bills of exchangedrawn upon it having not more than six months' sight torun, * * * which grow out of transactions involvingthe domestic shipment of goods provided shipping docu-ments conveying or securing title are attached at the timeof acceptance.
Thus the law makes it a condition precedentto the eligibility of such a draft for acceptanceby a national bank that the draft be accompa-nied at the time of acceptance by shippingdocuments conveying or securing title to theeoods shipped. H, therefore, in the case underdiscussion, there is attached to the draft at thetime of acceptance merely an express companyreceipt in the usual form, the draft would notbe eligible for acceptance by a national bank,since such a receipt can not be considered ashipping document conveying or securing titleas required by law. It is conceivable, how-ever, that some arrangement could be madewith the express company whereby it wouldissue shipping documents conveying or secur-ing title to the gold, which could be attachedto the draft at the time of acceptance.
The board has held, however, that a draftdrawn by a purchaser of goods is not eligiblefor acceptance merely because it is secured by a
bill of lading covering the goods purchased,and that in such a case it is also necessary thatthe proceeds of the draft be used by thedrawer—that is, the purchaser—to pay forthe goods covered by the bill of lading. Inorder, therefore, to bring the transactionwithin the spirit and purpose of section 13of the Federal reserve act, it must be establishedalso that the draft is drawn and used to financethe' purchase and shipment of the gold.
There is also a question as to the propermaturity of such a draft. Where a draft isdrawn to finance the shipment of goods, theboard has ruled that the maturity of the draftshould bear some reasonable relation to theperiod required for the actual shipment of thegoods and that the draft should not be drawnfor the purpose of furnishing to the buyerworking capital during the process of manu-facture of the goods shipped. It appears fromthe statement of facts in the present case thatthe underlying purpose of the acceptance creditis to furnish the national bank's customer withcapital to enable him to refine or manufacturethe gold after its receipt. The board is of theopinion that the use of a banker's acceptanceto finance such an operation is an abuse of thedomestic acceptance privilege, and that if thematurity of the draft exceeds the period rea-sonably necessary to complete the shipment ofthe gold, it should be deemed ineligible foracceptance. It is fundamental that an accept-ance is not intended merely to supplement aborrower's normal line of credit, but is intend-ed as an additional means of financing self-liquidating commercial transactions.
In conclusion, the board is of the opinionthat the drafts under consideration would notbe eligible for acceptance unless (1) shippingdocuments conveying or securing title areattached at the time of acceptance; (2) it isestablished that the proceeds of the drafts areto be used to pay for the gold shipped; (3) thematurity of tne drafts is not greater than theperiod reasonably required for the process ofshipment and delivery of the goods to thebank's customer; and (4) the drafts complyin other respects with the relevant provisionsof the law and the board's regulations.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 24: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL KESERVE BULLETIN. 159
New National Bank Charters.The Comptroller of the Currency reports the following
increases and reductions in the number and capital ofnational banks during the period from December 30,1922,to January 26, 1923, inclusive:
New charters issuedEestored to solvencyIncrease of capital approved1 ,
Aggregate of new charters, banks restored tosolvency, and banks increasing capital —
Liquidations .Reducing capital2
Total liquidations and reductions of capital..Consolidations of national banks under act of Nov.
7,1918Aggregate increased capital for periodReduction of capital owing to liquidations, etc.
Net decrease
Num-ber ofbanks.
Amountof
capital.
$2,930,0000
8,735,000
16,385,000
1,323,000,000
16', 385,0004,720,00C
1 Includes one increase in capital of $175,000 Incident to a consolida-tion under act of Nov. 7,1918.
* Includes two reductions in capital aggregating $100,000 Incident toconsolidations under act of Nov. 7,1918.
Fiduciary Powers Granted to National BanksDuring the month of January the Federal Reserve
Board approved applications of the national banks listedbelow for permission to exercise one or more of the fidu-ciary powers named in section 11 (k) of the Federal reserveact as amended, as follows:
1. Trustee.2. Executor.3. Administrator.4. Kegistrar of stocks and bonds.5. Guardian of estates.6. Assignee.7. Receiver.8. Committee of estates of lunatics.9. In any other fiduciary capacity in which State banks,
trust companies, or other corporations which come intocompetition with national banks are permitted to actunder the laws of the State in which the bank is located.
The numerals opposite the name of each bank indicatethe power or powers it is authorized to exercise, as givenbelow:
Place.
Ocean Grove, N. IMonticello,N.Y.Wilmington, DelBradford, PaMhBradford, PaMauch Chunk. PaState College. Fa.Alliance, OhioColumbus, Ohio...Toledo, Ohio
Ford City, PaVandergrift. Pa . . .Bay ton, Ohio
Salem. VaWashington, D,C.
Dis-trictNo.
Name of bank.
Ocean Grove National Bank..National Bank of Monticello..Union National BankCommercial National Bank...Mauch Chunk National Bank.First National B a n k . . . . . . . . . .Alliance-First National Bank <Commercial National Bank. . .
First National Bank
First National BankCitizens National Bank. . .American National Bank.
Farmers National Bank...District National Bank.. -
Powersgranted.
Ito9.Ito9.Ito9.Ito9.Ito9.Ito9.Ito9.Ito3,5to7 and 9.
Ito7and 9.
Ito9.Ito9.1 to7 and
9.Ito9.Ito8.
Place.Dis-trictNo.
Name of bank.
Elberton, GaBockford.IllIndiana Harbor, Ind.Highland, IIIChippowa Falls, Wis.Stockton, Calif
Taeoma, Wash '. 12 j Pupcl Sound National Bunk.
6 First National Bank7 j Forest City National Bank. . .7 j Unitod States National Bank.S [ First National Hank
Lumbcrmciis National 13onk.First National Bank12
Powersgranted.
l t oO.1 toO.l t o Ol tow.1 toO.I to 3,
fi to 7.l to y.
Officers and Directors of Federal Reserve Banks.
Following is a list of officers and directors ofFederal reserve banks, including directorselected for the three-year term ending Decem-ber 31, 1925:
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF BOSTON.
Frederic H. Curtlss, chairman and Federal reserve ajrent. Allen ITollis,doputy chairman. W. P. G. Harding, governor.
Director.
Class A:. Thomas P. Beal
Edward S. KennardFrederick S. Chamberlain...
Class B:Philip R.AllenCharles G. WashburnE. R. Morse
Class C:Frederic H. CurtfssAllen HolllsJesse H. Metcalf
Residence.
Boston, MassRumford, MeNew Britain, Conn
East Walpolc, Mass...Worcester, MassProctor, Vt
Boston, MassConcord, N. HProvidence, R. I
Termexpires.
Doc. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Doc. 31,1925
Doc.' 31,1023Dec. 31,1921Dec. 31,1025
Dec. 31,1923Doc. 31,1024Dec. 31,1925
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK.
Pierre Jay, chairman and Federal reservo agent. Win, L. Saunders,deputy chairman. Benjamin Strong, governor.
Class A:R. H. TremanCharles SmithGates W. McGarrah...
Class B:Richard H. Williams..Frank L. StevensOwen D. Young
Class C:Wm.L. SaundersC M . WoolleyPierre Jay
Ithaca, N. YOneonta, N. YNew York, N. Y
Madison, N. JNorth Hoosick, N. Y.New York, N. Y
New York, N. Ydo
Dec. 31,1923Doc. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Doc. 31,1925
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA.
Richard L. Austin, chairman and Federal reserve agent. H . B. Thomp-son, deputy chairman. Geo. W. Norris, governor.
Class A:Jos. Wayne, jr .Francis DouglaiiglasjohnC. Cosgrove....
Class B:Edwin S. S t u a r t —Charles K. Haddon.Alba B.Johnson.. . .
ClassC:R.L.AustinChas. C.Harrison...H . B . Thompson....
Philadelphia, P a . .Wilkes-Barre, P a -Johnstown, Pa
Philadelphia, P a . .Camden, N. JPhiladelphia, P a . .
. . . .do ,. . . . .doWilmington, Del.
Doc. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 25: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
160 FEDERAL EESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CLEVELAND.
D. C. Wills, chairman and Federal reserve agent. Lewis Blair Williams,deputy chairman. E. R. Fancher, governor.
Director.
Class A:Robert Wardrop..O.N.SamsChess Lamberton.
Class B:Thomas A. CombsJohn Stambaugh..R.P.Wright
Class C:D.C.WUISW. W. Knight....L.B. Williams....
Residence. Term expires.
Pittsburgh, PaHillsboro, OhioFranklin, Pa
Lexington, KyYoungstown, OhioErie, Pa. . .^
Cleveland, OhioToledo, OhioCleveland, Ohio
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec, 31,1925
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND.Caldwell Hardy, chairman and Federal reserve agent. Frederic A.
Delano, deputy chairman. George J. Seay, governor.
Class A: |L. E.Johnson Aldcrson, W. VaCharles E. Rieman Baltimore, MdJohn F. Bniton Wilson, N. C
Class B: ;D.R.Coker Hartsville, S. CEdmund Strudwick Richmond, VaEdwin C. Graham i Washington, D. C
Class C: |Caldwell Hardy \ Richmond, VaFrederic A. Delano j Washington, D. C.Robert Lassiter i Charlotte, N. C
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA.Joseph A. McCord,. chairman and Federal reserve agent. W.
Kettig, deputy chairman. M. B. Wellborn, governor.H.
Class A:P. R. KittlesJohn K. OttleyOscar Newton
Class B:Leon C.SimonJ.A.McCraryW.H. Hartford....
Class C:Joseph A. McCord..Lindsey Hopkins..,W.H. Kettig
Sylvania, GaAtlanta, GaJackson, Miss
New Orleans, LaDecatur, GaNashville, Tenn
Atlanta, Ga.do.
Birmingham, Ala.
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO.William A. Heath, chairman and Federal reserve agent. James
Simpson, deputy chairman. James B. McDougal, governor.
Class A;E. L; JohnsonGeorge M. Reynolds...Charles H. McNider...
Class B:iA. H.VogelS. T. Crapo
Class C:James SimpsonWm. A. HeathF.C.Ball
Waterloo, Iowa.. .Chicago, 111Mason City, Iowa.
Milwaukee, Wis.,Detroit, Mich....
Chicago, III.,do..
Muncie, Ind.,
Dec.Dec.Dec.
Dec.Dec.
Dec.Dec.Dec.
31.192331.192431,1925
31,192431.1925
31,192331,192431,1925
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS.William McC. Martin, chairman and Federal reserve agent. John W.
Boehne, deputy chairman. David C. Biggs, governor.
Class A:John G. LonsdaleJ.C.UttcrbackJohn C.Martin
Class B:LeRoy PercyRolla WellsW. B. Plunkett
St. Louis, MoPaducah, KySalem, 111
Greenville, MissSt. Louis, MoLittle Rock, Ark
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS—Continued.
Director.
Class C:John W. BoehneWm. McC. MartinC. P. J. Mooney
Residence.
Evansville, Ind'St. Louis, MoMemphis, Tenn
Term expires
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS.
John H. Rich, chairman and Federal reserve agent. Homer P. Clark,deputy chairman. R. A. Young, governor.
Class A:J. C. BassettWesley C. McDowellTheodore Wold
Class B:N. B. HolterF. P. HixonF. R. Bigelow
Class C:JohnH. RichHomer P. ClarkGeo. W. McCormick.
Aberdeen, S. DakMarion, N. Dak...Minneapolis, Minn
Helena, MontLa Crosse, WisSt. Paul, Minn....
Minneapolis, MinnSt. Paul, Minn....Menominee, Mich.
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF KANSAS CITY.
Asa E. Ramsay, chairman and Federal reserve agent. Heber Hord,deputy chairman. W. J. Bailey, governor.
Class A:E. E.Mullaney ,J.C.Mitchell ,Frank W.Sponahle..
Class B:Harry W.Gibson...,T. C. Byrne ,M. L. McClure
Class C:AsaE. RamsayHeber HordFred O. Roof.../....,
Hill City, Kans.Denver, Colo....Paola, Kans
Muskogee, OklaOmaha, NebrKansas City, Mo
.do.Central City, Nebr.Denver, Colo
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS.
W. B. Newsome, chairman and Federal reserve agent. B. A. McKinney,governor.
Class A: IHowell E. Smith j McKinney, Tex.T " " Houston, Tex...,
Clarendon, Tex.,John T. Scott,W. H. Patrick
Class B:J. J. Culbertson Paris, Tex<J . * . V J U 1 U D I l i O V J U . - . . . . . . . . . . . . X t t l l O , i . O A . . . . . . . . . . .
Frank Kell Wichita Falls, Tex.. . ." " " Fort Worth, TexMarion Sansom.
Class C:*Clarence E.LinzW. B. Newsome.
Dallas, Tex.do
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO.
John Perrin, chairman and Federal reserve agent. Walton N. Moore,deputy chairman. J. U. Calkins, governor.
Class A:John W. BaerM. A. BuchanC. K. Mclntosh
Class B:A. B. C. Dohrmann..Wm. T. SesnonE.H.Cox
Class C:John PerrinWalton N. MooreWm. Sproule
Pasadena, Calif ,Palo Alto, Calif ,San Francisco, Calif.,
. . . .do
. . . .doMadera, Calif
San Francisco, Calif..do I ,do
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
Dec. 31,1923Dec. 31,1924Dec. 31,1925
1 One vacancy.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 26: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BUI/LETIN. 161
State Banks and Trust Companies.
Admissions.
The following list shows the State banks and trustcompanies which were admitted to membership in theFederal Reserve System during the month ending January31, 1923, on which date 1,641 State institutions weremembers of the system:
District No. 2.
Fort Lee Trust Co., Fort Lee,N.J
Irving Bank of New York, NewYork,N.Y
District No. 3.
Oxford Bank & Trust Co., Phila-delphia, Pa. (succeeding theOxford Bank of Frankford)
District No. 5.
North St. Louis Trust Co.Louis, Mo
St.
District No. IS.
Union Trust Co., San Francisco,Calif
Capital.
$100,000
12,500,000
250,000
200,000
1,200,000
Surplus.
520,000
1,500,000
100,000
40,000
1,975,000
Total
$130,000
300,140,206
3,826,595
2,795,295
38,903,541
Converted into national banks.—Alpine State Bank;Alpine, Tex.; American Savings Bank, Pontiac, Mich.,Oklahoma State Bank, Cordell, Okla.; Cordell State Bank,Cordell, Okla.; First Guaranty State Bank, Quanah,Tex.; Puget Sound Bank & Trust Co., Tacoma, Wash.
Merged ivith another member bank.—Community Bank,Whittier, Calif.; Industrial Bank of New York, New York,N. Y.; Ocean Park Bank, Ocean Park, Santa Monica,Calif.; Commercial Trust & Savings Bank, Memphis,Tenn.; Bank of Fergus County, Lewistown, Mont.
Rechartered.—-The Oxford Bank of Frankford, Philadel-phia, Pa., a member bank, has been rechartered underthe name "Oxford Bank & Trust Co." and the new organi-zation admitted to membership.
Voluntary liquidation.—Bank of Southern Wisconsin,Janesville, wis.; Farmers & Merchants Bank, Hartwell,Ga.
Withdrawal—Security State Bank, Ponca City, Okla.Change of name—The Dallas County State Bank, Dallae
Tex., to the Mercantile Bank & Trust Co.; the Trust Com-pany of Georgia, Atlanta, Ga., to Lowry Bank and liustCompany of Georgia; American-Liberty Bank & Trust CcNew Orleans, La., to American Bank & Trust Co.; OgdenSavings Bank, Ogden, Utah, to First and Utah SavingsBank of Ogden; Union & Mercantile Trust Co., LittleRock, Ark., to Union Trust Co.
Acceptances to 100 Per Cent.
Since the issuance of the January BULLETIN the followingbank has been authorized by the Federal Reserve Boardto accept drafts and bills of exchange up to 100 per centof its capital and surplus:
Irving Bank of New York, New York, N. Y.
FOREIGN LOANS PLACED IN THE UNITEDSTATES IN 1922.
In continuation of similar tables furnishedfor the two previous years the Guaranty TrustCo. of New York has furnished to the FederalReserve Board a summary table setting forthamounts of principal foreign government,municipal, and corporate loans placed in theUnited States during the calendar year 1922.Corresponding figures for 1921 appeared onpages 1050-1051 of the September, 1922,BULLETIN and for 1920 on page 135 of theFebruary, 1921, BULLETIN.
SUMMARY OP PRINCIPAL FOREIGN GOVKRNMKNT, MUNICI-PAL, AND CORPORATION LOANS OFFKHKD FOR SUB-SCRIPTION IN TIIK UNITED STATES DURING 1022, IN-CLUDING LOANS OF AMERICAN CORPORATIONS DOINGBUSINESS ABROAD.
[In thousands of dollars.]
Country.
Australia •.Dutch East IndiesBelgiumCzechoslovakiaDenmarkFrancoNetherlandsNorwayYugoslaviaArgentinaBoliviaBrazilChileColombiaPeruUruguayCubaDominican Republic...HaitiUnited States posses-
sions4
Canada.Newfoundland
Total.
Govern-mentand
munici-pal.
Corpora-tion.
1O.75S100,000 |
21,500 !.
*3i,*666'47,40021,575
28,0952-1,000361,38019,3505,0002,7506,000(*)6,700
16,000
5 50,5875207,220
G,000
GS0,565
2,500
5o66"41,07518,220
Total.
13,258100,000
2,50021,5005,00072,07565,02021,575
Loans ofAmer-ican
corpora-tions
abroad.
4,000|
28,500
46,520
153,206
15,2502S,09524,00005,38019,3505,0002,7506,000
28,5000,71)0
10,000
41,072245,801
6,000
«S33,771
10, (XX)
23,421
2,800
30,221
0 randtotal.
13.2.18100, OfX)
2,50021,500ft, 0<X)
82,97505,02021,57515,25028,09521,00065,3SG19,3505,0002,7500,000
51,9210,700
16,000
41,0722iS,G01
0,000
809,992
1 The balance of an offering of $25,000,000 is understood to have beenwithdrawn.
2 State of Bahia $5,000,000 issue oftcrcd in October is understood tohave been withdrawn and is not included.
* Bank loan of $5,000,000 in January is not included.* Government and municipal figures include Hawaii.5 Compilation of Commercial & Financial.Chronicle for 11 months,
plus December offerings as advertised.* Foreign currency issues converted into dollars, with two exceptions,
on the basis of the original offering price, comprise $03,303,000 of thegovernment and municipal total and 522,095,000 of the corporate total.
The following exhibit shows the total foreignfinancing for each of the last three years:
[In thousands of dollars.]
1920 . . .1921.1922
Year.Govern-
ment andmunicipal
3S6,922507,070CS0,5G5
Corpora-tion.
189,400118,7501S9.427
Total.
576,322625,820869,992
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 27: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
162 FEDERAL RESERVE BUULETIN". FEBRUARY, 1923.
It is seen that while the total volume offoreign financing in this country in-1921 wasover 50 per cent larger than in 1920, this in-crease is limited entirely to foreign govern-ment and municipal issues. The large declineof foreign corporate issues in 1921 reflected thegeneral industrial depression, affecting pri-marily Cuban and European issues, and to asmaller extent those of Canadian corporations.The latter show the largest decline during,1922, though this decline was more than fullymade up during that year by the large in-crease in the sale of Canadian Government andmunicipal securities in the American market.
COTTON FINANCING.1
With the rapid development of the cotton-producing and the cotton-manufacturing in-dustries has grown the problem of financingcotton from the time the seed is planted to thetime when the finished product is sold. Thenumber of bales of raw cotton produced hasincreased from 154,000 in the year 1800 to anaverage of 13,000,000 bales for the 10 years1911-1920. Likewise the value of the crophas increased from $33,000,000 to $1,000,000,-000 for the same periods. The problem offinancing this billion-dollar crop is a gigantictask best understood by those most intimatelyconnected with the production and distribu-tion of cotton.
Customary methods of financing cotton arethe result of practices that had their inceptionin the early days of cotton production. Asthe industry developed the original methodsof financing were improved and new institu-tions grew to aid in the process. Until thebeginning of the war, in 1914, the problem offinancing cotton was clearly divided into twoparts. The task of extending credit for grow-ing and domestic shipment was borne by thebanking structure within the United States,while the financing of cotton exports washandled largely through the London discountmarket. Since 1914 the problem of financingexport shipments of cotton has been graduallyshifted to the shoulders of American bankers.
1 This is the first of a series of articles prepared by Sir. W. J. Carson
Information upon which this article is based was obtained largelythrough replies to a number of questionnaires which were sent to plant-ers, merchants, bankers, and others who are interested in the industrym various capacities, and from some publications of the United StatesJJepartment of Agriculture. To all of them acknowledgment is due.Acknowledgment is also due to the Federal Reserve branch bank atent is also due to the Federal Reserve branch ban
Cotton financing is largely a banking prob-lem, but it is one that calls into use everyform of modern instruments of credit and isdependent upon these instruments for itsproper functioning. A study of the probleminvolves an analysis of the small grower andhis credit needs; of the plantation owner andhis financial connections with local credit in-stitutions; of the cotton factor as he establishesfinancial relations with local banks and, inturn, finances the planters; of the merchantor broker as he concentrates his purchasesand holds the cotton in storage a/svaiting de-mands from the mills; of the^ mills as theypurchase and hold cotton awaiting demand forcotton goods; and of the cooperative market^ing associations which, in recent years, havebeen established to aid the growers in collect-ing their cotton and distributing it accordingto the demands of the trade.
After a brief description of the cotton indus-try as a whole, the financing of the grower inupland long-staple areas will be discussed.
I. THE COTTON INDUSTRY.
Cotton grown in the United States may beclassified into four groups according to itsuses and commercial value—(1) sea-island, (2)American-Egyptian, (3) upland long staple,and (4) upland short - staple. In addition,these cottons are classified according to (1)grade, (2) color, (3) length of staple, and (4)character, all of which are important in de-termining the value of the cotton, as theyindicate the spinning qualities. The four typesare found in different geographical sections andare of different staple lengths. Sea-islandcotton has a very fine fiber, varying from 1 \ to2 inches in length, and is the most valuable ofall cottons. American-Egyptian cotton has astaple from If to 1-J-& inches in length and ranksnext to sea island in value. Upland longstaple, known as "staple cotton/ ' l ias a fiberlength of \\ to 1J inches and constitutes thegreater part of the long-staple cotton grown inthe United States. Upland short staple,which represents about 90 per cent of theAmerican cotton production and 60 per cent ofthe world's crop, has a staple varying from f to1 \ inches in length. There are other methodsof classifying cotton which are commonly ap-plied in the trade. These have given rise tofive regional trade names, known as uplands,sea island, Gulf, Texas, and American-Egyp-tian. The accompanying map shows the sec-tions of the country in which each type of cot-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 28: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 163
ton is grown and the regional trade namethat is commonly applied.
The average acreage, production, and yieldper acre of cotton for each of the cotton-producing States for the 10 years 1911-1920are given in the following table:
AVERAGE COTTON ACREAGE, PRODUCTION, AND YIELD PERACRE FOR 10 YEARS, 1911-1920.
State.
United States....
Alabama..Arizona 3
ArkansasCalifornia3
Florida .Georgia
Louisiana..Mississippi.Missouri
North CarolinaOklahomaSouth CarolinaTennesseeTexasVirginia
Acreageharvested.1
34,939,900
3,227 500120,000
2, 554, 200112,750187 800
5,234, 8001 202,10(02,991,900
129,2001,519,7002 698 2002 S07 900
844 10011 341,800
43, 600
Cotton produced, ex-clusive of linters( e q u i v a l e n t 500-
pound bales 2).
Gross.
13,053,256
1,055,43660,080
933,01104,11746,669
2,039,040435,001
1,055,98067,793
828,956949,746
1, 273, 239338,046
3,7S9,30923,346
Net.
12,4SS,967
1 009,22457,449
940,97101,17544,904
1,949,401415,9S2
1,010,06264,926
790, 874909,213
1,304,94(3323,509
3,630,81022,2S5
Yield(lint
poundsper acre).
178.4
1,56.3239.31S4.2271.2119.5185. 2160. 91CS.S
to t
o
10S. 5232. 4191.6160. 0255. 5
1 Yearly acreagculture, 1920.
Y
figures taken from Yearbook,' Department of Agri-
,* Yearly production figures taken from Cotton Production and Distri-
bution Bulletins, Bureau of Census.3 Average for 4 years, 1917-1920.
average value, 1911-1920, which is shown inthe following table for the leading States:
AVERAGE AGGREGATE VALUE OP COTTON CHOP, LINTCOTTON, AND COTTON SEED FOR 10 YEARS, 1911-1020.l
State.Av5n ?of°
couoncr°op.
Uuited States :$1,300,807,(KM") Si, 100,377,(XX)
Alabama 01,107,000Arizona* n,:v.»."i,oooA rkansas I 101,51 o, i K W»Califoraia 3 t 9,522, 5iH)Florida I 5, '390, 000Georgia | 211,01S,<>00Louisiana ! 47,or>,oOOMississippi ; 100,5-10,000•* r ; ^ ; ^ J"1 i i* ru w \
7S, 591)
KV
MissouriNorth CarolinaOklahomaSouth CarolinaTennesseeTexasVirginiaAll other States
G,Glfi,000KTvis.-), ooo91,074, (KM)
147,233,000:j3,oos,ooo
303 , (Wi, 0002,42">,0002, 111; (XX) i
122,2S,
308
\T*'921,(MX)Tioo.ooo7S1, (KH)M3'000700,000(K)3,0TX)970, 000010, 000791,000
V a l u e ofco t ton .NO
$200,
IT),1,
in,l,
7,17,l,
u,13,21,
4 IK)
0071202.VJ'2^uS25{):>()CISciy
Ml.
(XX)
(XX)000(XX)
:>oo(KX)(XX)000000
140 0000 0 1 ,9 3 1 ,•107,
110,Ho,320,
(XX)(XX)000000(XX)(XX)000
1 Yearly valuation figures taken from Cotton Production and Dis-tribution* Bureau of the Census, 1911-1920.
a Average for 4 years, 1917-1920.
In the above tables the average figures forthe years 1911-1920 were taken, rather thanfigures for a specific year within that period,because of the fact that the cotton industrywas undergoing rapid changes from year toyear. Within this period the price reached itslowest point (1914) and its highest point (1920).
DISTRIBUTION OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF COTTON GROV/N
COTTONS^
GUL.F
COTTON^
Cx;;;;^ U
[ T I JAMERICAN EGYPT/AN
The annual value of the cotton crop, bothlint cotton and cotton seed, increased fromapproximately §500,000,000 in 1900 to almost$2,500,000,000 in 1919. Since then the yearlyvalue of the cotton crop has been near the
The crop also reached its maximum figure in1914, totaling more than 16,000,000 bales.Since 1920 two of the smallest crops within thepresent century have been produced, but thevalues have been near the 10-year average.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 29: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
164 BESEBVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
Although cotton is the principal staple cropof the Southern States and therefore of greatimportance as a cash crop, the disadvantagesof relying entirely on one crop have been real-ized. Diversification and rotation of cropshave in recent years been practiced to a large
extent in many sections of the Cotton Belt,and as a result the farm income in those sec-tions has become more secure. The followingtable shows the main crops that are producedin the cotton States and the relative acreageof each for the separate States:
TOTAL IMPROVED ACREAGE IN 1920, AND ACREAGE IN COTTON, TOBACCO, PEANUTS, CEREALS, AND HAYFORAGE, HARVESTED IN 1919 FOR PRINCIPAL COTTON STATES.
State.*Improvedacreage,
1920.Cotton. Tobacco. Peanuts.
Cereals.
Total. Corn.
Hay andForage.
AlabamaArkansas. ,GeorgiaLouisianaMississippi.1...North CarolinaOklahomaSouth Carolina,Tennessee3
Texas
9,893,4079,210,556
13,055,2095,626,2209,325,6778,198,409
18,125,3216,184,1593,218,432
31,227,503
2,628,1542,553,8114,720,4981,343,3342,948,3871,373,7012,732,9622,631,719800,069
11,522,537
3,435
25,007
459,011
103,49629,479
334,23921,692201,78817,67016,933125,76613,9697,4601,898
165,407
3,456,6672,868,5834,620,9601,996,6902 718,0553,133,89110,053,9312,048,1941 045,171
10,768,930
3,334,2042,292,1194,269,4551,504,9702,657,0092,311,4622,472,9051,753,813
943,9204,748,655
705,2791,002,3331,248,814
208,631483,544992,374
2,073,513668,538341,972
2,390,457
1 In addition to the above crops certain others are grown extensively in some States. The chief of these are 234,049 acres of sugar cane inLouisiana; 456,959 acres of rough rice in Louisiana and 143,211 acres in Arkansas; 1,482,663 acres of kafir and milo in Texas and 1,152,430 acres inOklahoma. Oklahoma and Texas are also the two greatest wheat-producing States in the cotton belt. Wheat nearly doubles corn in acreageharvested in Oklahoma. Oats are grown extensively throughout the cotton States, but Texas and Oklahoma exceed the other States in acreageharvested.
3 Figures represent only 21 counties in west Tennessee, containing 800,039 acres in cotton out of the total 807,770 acres in cotton for the entireState.
The principal items of expense in producinga cotton crop are labor, rent, fertilizer, seed,stock feed, ginning, and baling. Of these laboris the greatest expense. Hand labor is neededin the growing season (April to July) to chopand hoe the cotton. In the fall, beginningabout September 1, hand labor is used entirelyto pick the cotton. The expense for culti-vating the crop is gradually being reduced insome sections through the adoption of bettermethods of cultivation arid the use of im-proved implements. But a machine to lessenthe greatest of all labor expense, that o l pick-ing, has not yet been successful. An itemizedlist of expenses for two years (1913 and 1920)is given in the following table for a 100-acrefarm in northern Texas under a crop-sharinglease, the landlord taking one-fourth of bothlint and seed as his rent on the basis of anaverage yield of 200 pounds per acre.1
ITEMS OF EXPENSE IN COTTON PRODUCTION.
Labor:Two hands for six months..Chopping cotton twice.,Picking 40 bales..Hauling cotton to "ginnery!!
Total..
1913
$240150510
48
948
1920
$840350900
96
2,186
»Items taken from Cotton Statistics, Official Report of World CottonConference, 1921, prepared by John A. Todd.
ITEMS OF EXPENSE IN COTTON PRODUCTION—Contd.
Tenant's capital:Four mules^Harness '.Breaking plowTwo cultivatorsTwo plantersTwo wagonsOne pair harrowsOne stalk cutterSixhoesScales for weighing cotton-Buggy and harnessHorseCotton sacks
Total 1
Interest thereon at 10per cent « . . . .Depreciation thereon a t 124 per centCotton seed, 75 bushelsGinning and baling, 40 bales ;.Stock feed:
450 bushels of c o r n . . . . .365 bales of hay
Supervision
Total cost (excluding tenant ' s capital)
1913
70032557560
1801526
42
130150
10
1,439
144ISO150120
225182120
2,069
1920
650100
70150112230
2765
63
135100
20
1,658
167209300320
562365180
4,289
Fertilizer is not included in the above listbecause very little is used in Texas. In theAtlantic States fertilizer is a principal expense,while in the intermediate areas, Mississippi,Tennessee, Arkansas, and Louisiana, it is usedto a lesser degree and therefore is not as heavyan expense as in the older States. Thecotton States using the most fertilizer in 1922were Georgia, Nortn Carolina, South Carolina,
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 30: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
FFBRUABY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 165
and Alabama. The values of the amountsused by these States were SI 1,057,000,$9,666,000, $8,076,000, and $6,819,000, re-spectively.
II . FINANCING THE GROAVER—LONG STAPLE
AREAS.
The two important problems in comiectionAvith financing the cotton industry from thetime the seed is planted until the raw cottonreaches the spinner are, first, that relating tothe growing and the sources of credit for plant-ers and tenants; and, second, that involvedin financing the marketing of cotton and itsmovement from the farm to the Americanand foreign mills. Of these, the first canclearly be separated into two parts—(1)financing the grower in the long-staple ordelta areas of Mississippi and Arkansas, and(2) financing the grower in short-staple orupland areas of other sections of the CottonBelt.
A. THE LONG-STAPLE COTTON INDUSTRY.
The principal long-staple areas of uplandcotton are found in the alluvial soil sections ofMississippi and Arkansas. The territory in-cludes 10 counties in Mississippi and parts of14 others;2 2 counties in Arkansas composedentirely of alluvial land and other countiesadjoinmg these or bordering on the MississippiRiver that have alluvial strips.3 A largepercentage of the cotton produced in Chester-field, Darlington, and Marlboro Counties inJSouth Carolina, some counties in northeasternTexas ^ordering on the Red River and itstributaries, and some counties in central andsouthern Oklahoma bordering on the Arkansas,Canadian, and Red Rivers is long-stapleupland, but the methods of operating farmsand financing the grower are not differentfrom other sections of these States where short-staple upland cotton is grown. Long-staplecotton is also produced in the irrigated regionsof Arizona and southern California. Thisis chiefly American-Egyptian cotton, and theindustry there is comparatively new.
The alluvial or delta areas of Missisippi ex-tend along the Mississippi River from just
»Theparts oi ^JJA^UL, ^it"s> w w - j *•".-*Francis. Seventeen others contain
30425—23 -3
strips.
below Memphis on the north to Vicksburg onthe south. The region is a largo triangulararea between the Yazoo and MississippiRivers, comprising about 6,400 square miles.The soil is very fertile, as it has frequently beensubject to the overflows of the MississippiRiver but is now protected by a system oflevees. The climatic conditions and the fer-tility of the soil make the section particularlyadaptable to cotton growing, and an adequatesupply of labor is provided from the lurgepopulation of negroes.
Cotton is the principal crop grown in thedelta. The farms are very large and are oper-ated entirely on the plantation system. Theplantation owners either live on the plantationsand supervise the farm operations themselvesor in the nearby towns and operate themthrough managers who live on the plantations.The latter is more often the method used. Thesystems of tenure are not altogether differentfrom those found in other plantation areas ofthe South. But it is in the delta sections,perhaps to a. larger extent than elsewhere, thatthe plantation system is maintained as it wasin the early period of cotton cultivationthroughout the Cotton Belt. The principalsystems of tenure in the delta are threo innumber—(1) share-cropping system, (2) share-renting system, and (3) cash-renting system.4The main points of difference between the sys-tems are determined by contract with thelandlord and tenant and they vary with thefinancial standing of the tenant.
Share-cropping system.—Under the share-cropping system, often called the half-and-halfsystem, the landlord furnishes the land, acabin for housing the tenant, all necessaryteams, harness, and feed for the teams, theseed, one-half of the fertilizers used, and thetenant's fuel wood; the tenant supplies thelabor for preparing the land/ cultivating, andgathering the crop, and works according to thedirection of the landlord. Each party underthis contract receives half of the crop and insome cases pays for his half of the ginning andbaling; in others the tenant pays for theginning and baling. When other crops aregrown besides cotton and corn, they are usu-ally divided equally between the landlord andtenant. The landlord exercises careful super-vision over the share croppers, who can onlybe considered as tenants from the point of
< E A Boeger and E. A. Goldenweiser—A Study of the Tenant Sys-tems of Farming in the Yazoo-Mississippi Delta. A professional paper.Bulletin No. 337, of the United States Department of Agriculture, 1916.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 31: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
166 FEDERAL KESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
operation; from the point of supervision theyare laborers, receiving half of the crop and theuse of a cabin in return for their services.
In some cases when the tenant plants anycrop other than cotton on his land he pays thelandlord a stated sum per acre for the use ofthe land and receives all of the crop raised.The following is a clause from a half-and-half," One-half/' contract of employer with em-ployee :
The said employee shall prepare the land, put inthe crop, cultivate and gather the same, in accordancewith the directions of said employer; and that said em-ployer agrees to provide cabin for housing saidemployee , and to furnish the necessary teams, tools,gear, and feed for said teams, at its own expense; and toadvance all necessary supplies to said employee , atprices to be agreed upon when delivered.
Share-renting system.—Under this system,often called the two-thirds or three-fourthscontract system, the tenant furnishes at hisown expense the necessary work stock, equip-ment and feed for the stock, tools, machinery,seeds, and all the labor for preparing the land,cultivating, and gathering the crop; the land-lord furnishes the land, cabin, and the tenant'sfuel. Fertilizers, if any are used, are paidfor by both landlord and tenant, the proportionbeing determined by the ratio of each party'sshare of the crop. The landlord also advancesall the necessary supplies to the tenant at pricesagreed upon when delivered. The tenant paysfor the ginning and baling. In return for allhis services he receives three-fourths of thecrop for his share. In some sections he re-ceives only two-thirds of the crop. The land-lord exercises supervision over the tenant'soperations, but the care of stock and machineryis not in accordance with the direction of thelandlord, as they belong to the tenant.
If any crop other than cotton is grown thetenant pays for the use of the land at a statedprice per acre out of his share of the cottonand cotton seed and receives all of the cropproduced. The following is a clause from a" Three-fourths" contract with employer andemployee:
The said employee shall, at own expense, fur-nish the necessary teams, tools, gear, and feed for the teamsand shall prepare the land, put in the crop, cultivate andgather the same, in accordance with the direction of saidemployer; and that said employer agrees to providecabin for housing said employee , and to advanceto said employee all necessary supplies at pricesagreed upon when delivered.
Cash-renting system.—The cash-renting sys-tem is found to a smaller degree than either
of the other systems. I t is similar to the share-renting system in that the tenant pays a fixedrent per acre in cash or lint cotton instead of ashare of the crop. If fertilizers are used theyare paid for entirely by the tenant- Theamount of supervision exercised by the land-lord over cash renters varies with the characterand ability of the tenant. If the landlordadvances supplies to the cash renters he has agreater interest in the crop than if the tenant isable to supply himself or establish independentcredit connections with local merchants.
B. ACCOMMODATION TO PLANTERS.
The methods of financing the large plantersin the Yazoo-Mississippi Delta differ in somerespects from those in use in other sections ofthe Cotton Belt, especially in the eastern cottonStates, where the farms are smaller and diversi-fication of crops has been introduced. I t isnecessary for most planters to borrow early inthe spring in order to prepare the soil, in somecases, to purchase seeds, equipment, and newimplements that are necessary, and to arrangeto supply their tenants with provisions duringthe seasons of cultivation.
Few planters have built up sufficient liquidassets to carry them through the period of cul-tivation. This has partly been due to the factthat much land is being constantly cleared oftimber, ditches are being dug, and other pioneerwork is being done, all of which involves a greatdeal of expense. Kecently the construction ofgood roads and drainage systems have laidheavy tax burdens on the planters and havealso absorbed much of their available liquidresources.
The planter in the delta secures his accom-modation for growing his crop from four prin-cipal sources—the bank, cotton factor, whole-sale merchant, and the local merchant. Thetenant receives his credit advances principallyfrom the landlord through the commissary orplantation store. In the alluvial sections ofArkansas the local merchant supplies the ten-ant with about 50 per cent of his credit needs,and the remainder is supplied by the landlord.The accompanying diagram illustrates the prin-cip al sources of credit for the delta cottongrowersand the various agencies through which itpasses before reaching the final consumers.
Advances by factors.—Formerly it was cus-tomary for the planters to make credit arrange-ments in the spring with a cotton factor. Theplanter agreed to deliver to the factor a certain
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 32: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 167
number of bales of cotton, and if the numberdelivered should be less than the numberspecified the planter was to pay a specifiedsum per bale as damages. A credit wasplaced upon the f actor7s books and the planterdrew against this foiJ all purposes. The factorwould secure the advances by either a croplien contract, chattel mortgage, or contract forcotton.to be delivered when ginned and baled.In some cases the loan was made on open ac-count, when the factor knew the financial
CREDIT STRUCTURE IN DELTA AREASFOR GROWING COTTON
CITYBANK
FEDERAL RESERVEBANK
LOCAL BANK
FACTORWHOLESALE
MERCHANTLOCAL SUPPLY
MERCHANT
PLANTER
COMMISSARY
SHARECROPPER
SHARERENTER
CASHTENANT
standing and the integrity of the planter.Loans were always made by factors to planters,with the expectation that cotton would be con-signed to the factor for sale. The consign-ments were to be made by the planter as soonas the cotton was gathered and prepared formarket. In recent years factorage businesshas suffered heavy losses from the decline inprices in 1920-21 and losses to R ^ t o " • ^the destruction by the boll weevil. Tlus hasled the factors to strengthen their Joans withreal-estate mortgages g^en b y P antei^^cover-ing their plantationsspecimen of a grower'sfactor:
y P ^The /ollowmg is a
contract with the
19.Whereas of , has this day agreed to advance
during the season of 19.. . . . . . . dollars, in moneyand supplies, at their discretion (all money to bear percent interest and supplies to be charged at their regularcredit prices), for the purpose of enabling to mako,gather, and market a crop
And whereas are in the commission busincKs andhave gone to a large expense in making preparations forthe handling and sale of cotton, it is hereby agreed that inconsideration of the above-mentioned advances thatagree to bind myself to ship said company as many as
bales of cotton or pay them commission on anynumber of bales less than said number than '. mayfail to ship said company at the rate of 1 and 25/100 dollarsper bale as agreed liquidated damages.
Witness Hand, day, and date above.Witness
Supplies, $.Cash, $-
Spring advances have declined considerably,and it is estimated that planters in Mississippionly receive about 10 per cent of such advancesfrom factors for the 1922 crop. In Arkansasthe amount was still smaller, averaging about5 per cent. There are some planters, however,able to secure their loans satisfactorily whoprefer to borrow entirely from the factors.
Bank loans.—It is estimated that the plantersin Mississippi secure from 50 to SO per cent oftheir loans from banks. In Arkansas the esti-mates range from 40 to 60 per cent, as the localmerchants play a greater r61e as a source forloans than in Mississippi. Loans by the banksare made principally on promissory notes se-cured by crop liens and chattel mortgages.The crop liens cover the growing crops and thechattel mortgages are given to cover live stock,implements, farm machinery, tools, and feedstuffs. Under present conditions real estatemortgages are frequently required. Prior to1920 it was the custom in Mississippi to loanon a straight promissory note, but the lossesthat resulted in 1920-21 have made banksmore cautious and security is taken in theforms mentioned. The conditions vary forbanks in Arkansas. One bank reports that 50per cent of the loans made to cotton plantersare made on unsecured promissory notes, whileanother reports that only 10 per cent of suchloans are thus made, and 90 per cent are madeon promissory notes secured by chattel mort-gages, realty mortgages, or crop liens.
The basis upon which loans are made by thebanks to planters varies in different sections ofthe delta. One bank reports that loans aremade in a flat sum for each acre in cultivation,varying from $4 to $10; another.states thatloans are made entirely on the planter's finan-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 33: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
168 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN FEBBUAEY, 1923.
cial standing and without any reference tothe number of acres under cultivation. Insome instances loans are made from monthto month to cover actual expenses incurred bythe planter in obtaining supplies and in meetingpay rolls. The planter in turn gives his noteeach month for the amount borrowed. Onebank in Arkansas states that loans are made onthe basis of $10 for each acre planted in cottonand corn. Another says that the banks ad-vance up to 50 per cent of the anticipated valueof the cotton crop.
Within recent years the presence of the bollweevil has influenced loans by banks to cottonplanters. The extent to wmch this influencehas been felt is not uniform for the differentbanks. But the general effect has been tocause banks to curtail their cotton advancesand to make the planters more conservative inthe use of credit. One bank reports that addi-tional loans have to be made to assist thefarmers to fight the weevil, but they are madeonly after a conservative use has been madeof credit extended earlier in the growing season.In connection with the presence of the weevilthe extent to which crop diversification hasbeen introduced is an important aspect infinancing the planter. Some banks haverefused to extend loans to planters unless theyproduce feed and feedstuffs. Others have in-creased advances to planters that have insti-tuted a system of diversification. In Arkansasone banker states that the problem of diversi-fication there has not been solved and has nothad any effect on bank advances. The oppo-site opinion is held by another, who thinks thatloans have been made much easier for thefarmers who are diversifying their crops.
The dates for maturity vary with the dif-ferent banks and different planters. Theloans are generally made to mature about thetime the crop begins to move to market. Theearliest notes made in the spring mature asearly as October 1 or October 15. Those thatare made later in the spring mature as late asNovember 15. In many cases the early notesare renewed, but renewals always depend uponthe rapidity of the crop movement. In normalyears it is not necessary to renew paper whichmatures after December 1. However, withinthe last two years the conditions have beenvery abnormal and many renewals have beenmade. Some loans have been extended for ayear. One bank reports that instead of renew-ing the notes of planters for funds used ingrowing the crop a new commodity loan isfrequently made on a note secured by ware-
house receipts. This liquidates the originalloan and gives the bank better security for anew loan.
The practice as to interest payments is notuniform. In Arkansas it is customary forthe notes to bear interest from their date; inMississippi some banks report that interest isdeducted in advance but the usual custom isto collect it at maturity.
Wholesale merchants.—Advances by whole-sale grocery companies, jobbers, and manu-facturers to the large planters in the delta areof importance. It is estimated that about 20per cent of the credit accommodations toplanters in Mississippi are from wholesalemerchants, while in Arkansas the amountvaries from 5 to 10 per cent, averaging undernormal conditions about 10 per cent. Whole-sale grocery companies making sales largelyin the delta estimate that from 50 to 90 percent of their sales in the delta are made toplantation owners operating plantation storesor commissaries. The other sales in the terri-tory are made to retail merchants operatingin the smaller towns.
Terms of sale.—The terms of sale by whole-sale merchants to planters are not uniformwith the several wholesale houses. Hereto-fore the terms of credit have frequently beenspring to fall, but within the past two years thewholesale merchants have been shorteningthe terms and approaching a cash basis. And,although some cash sales are made by a fewhouses, the general practice with the mer-chants is to make sales for 30 days. How-ever, this is subject to variation, as underpresent conditions it is often necessary for thetime to be extended to 60 or 90 days and in afew instances to 120 days. It is the practicefor the planters to borrow from the factorsand banks to pay the wholesale houses ratherthan have merchants carry them for a longerperiod than 30 days. The usual custom withthe merchants is to make sales to planters onopen account or unsecured promissory notes.It is estimated that normally about 75 percent of sales are made on open account and25 per cent on unsecured promissory notes.Since 1920 the wholesale companies have beenmore cautious in extending credits, and whensales were made for a longer period than 30days whatever available security the planterscould furnish was taken; in many cases thishas been real estate mortgages or crop liens.The tendency is for the planters to give thebanks or factors the choice security and there-by obtain funds with which the wholesale
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 34: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 169
merchants can be paid. The wholesale mer-chants often find it necessary to borrow fromthe banks in order to advance to the fanners.Such loans are generally made on "opennote," but the planters7 notes, when available,are sometimes discounted or used as collateralby the merchant.
The plantation commissary.—The local storeis of small importance as a source of credit forplanters and tenants in the delta. The planta-tions usually operate commissaries to supplythe tenants and thus serve the purpose 01 thelocal stores or merchants in the Eastern States.
The plantation commissary is a warehousefrom which the planter periodically deliversrations to his tenants. Share croppers andshare renters are supplied entirely by the land-lords through the commissary. " Cash renterssometimes receive their supplies from the samesource, but they usually have a better financialstanding and can secure credit accommodationelsewhere, chiefly from retail merchants in thesmall towns. It is generally stated in the con-tracts, when written, that supplies will be ad-vanced to the tenant by the landlord "atprices agreed upon when delivered." If thecontracts are verbal, a similar agreement isusually made. The principal articles that areadvanced by the commissary are meat, meal,sugar, coffee, tobacco, and' clothing. Whenfeedstuffs for the stock have to be furnishedthe commissaries advance them to the tenanton the same terms as other articles are ad-vanced.
The methods of advancing to tenants arcfairly uniform. Each tenant is given a line ofcredit based upon the number of acres ho isto plant. This is divided into monthly install-ments and the tenant is allowed to draw thestated amount each month. Advances aremade on open account to share renters andshare croppers. The commissary is alwayssecured against losses through advances of thiskind by the landlord's lien. If advances aremade to cash renters they are often secured bythe renter's promissory note collateraled by achattel mortgage covering the tenant s growingcrop, live stock, and farm machinery.
The credit price charged by the commissariesis somewhat higher than the cash price. Whenit is customary for the commissaries to makesome cash sales, the cash price often rangesfrom 10 to 20 per cent lower than the tuneprice. In all cases the time price covers theexpenses of deferred payment and in only afew instances is there an additional charge asinterest jnajfe on the entire sum advanced.
The time price charged is about the same assimilar prices charged by retail merchantsoperating in the small towns of the delta.
Advances aro made to tenants as long as theyare cultivating the crop. Many tenants aro ofvery limited means, and it is often necessaryto make advances in the late winter and earlyspring before work on the now crop actuallybegins. Advances are made regularly untilpicking season. At that time the tenant beginsto bring his cotton to market and liquidatesthe advances that were made to him from theproceeds of the sale.
The periods for settling with the tenants varywith different planters. In many cases thosettlement is not made until after the crop hasbeen sold, but tho general practice is to makesettlements as soon as the cotton has beenginned. Tho basis of settlement is tho marketprice for similar cotton on tho day of settle-ment. The planter settles with tho tenant ac-cording to the terms of tho contract. Theamounts of advances made to tho tenant by thecommissary aro totaled and deducted from hisshare of the crop. The remaining proceedsfrom the tenant's share in tho crop aro madeeither in cash or in credit on the books of thocommissary. If the latter process Ls used, thotenant builds a balance against which ho"draws" supplies in tho form of food andclothing throughout tho winter.
C. THK PROBLEM OF MARKKTlMi.
Tho problem of marketing cotton in the deltais solved in a manner somewhat different fromthat followed in other sections of the CottonBelt where local buying has become important.As has been stated earlier in this article, thoprincipal sources of funds for growing tho cropare the local banks, factors, and wholesale mer-chants. Tho local banks and factors are alsothe principal sources from which funds areobtained for marketing the cotton.
Consignment to factors.—Since 1920 the mar-keting process has been undergoing consider-able changes. Formerly it was customary forthe planter, as soon as tho cotton was ginnedand ready for market, to ship it directly to afactor in one of tho larger cities of that section,for sale and to strengthen the former's credit.Additional drafts were drawn on the factor forfunds, in tho form of currency and coin, whichwere needed to meet expenses arising frompicking and ginning and to make settlements.The draft was met by the factor in the samemanner as those that were drawn by the planter
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 35: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
170 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
to meet spring needs. The cotton upon reach-ing the factor was sampled, warehoused, in-sured, and eventually sold. The proceeds ofthe sale were added to the credit of the planteron the books of the factor. The factor alwayscharged the planter a commission for handlingthe cotton, and if credit had been extended tothe planter in the form of spring advances itwas deducted, with interest, from the proceedsof the sale of the cotton.
Although spring advances by the factors, as awhole, have been considerably reduced, largequantities of cotton are still sold by them forplanters on commission. The factor in orderto provide himself with funds for advancing toplanters on cotton consigned to him often bor-rows heavily from local banks. The loans areusually made on unsecured promissory notes,but frequently warehouse receipts for cottonconsigned to Him are pledged as collateral. Hisborrowing usually begins in August andSeptem-ber, as the cotton begins to come in, and con-tinues until December and January when,generally, all of the cotton has been sold.
Cooperative marketing.—The principal changein the methods of marketing and of financingthe long-staple cotton has been worked outthrough cooperation among the growers. Thecooperative marketing idea has not been con-fined to the delta regions of Mississippi. Ithas spread widely throughout the cotton States,and each State has organized a cooperativecotton-marketing association. The question offinancing the cotton-marketing associations isreserved for a later article, but as the StapleCotton Cooperative Association of Mississippioperated successfully in 1921, it is well here togive some facts relating thereto.
The association began business in September,1921, and handled 158,714 bales of staplecotton, valued at approximately §20,000,000for the delta planters in the season of 1921-22.This was about one-third of the total cottonproduced in the alluvial soil sections of Missis-sippi. The association borrowed largely fromthe War Finance Corporation and from banks inthe larger cities through the medium of bankers'acceptances.
In the delta counties of Arkansas local buyingis more important than in those of Mississippi.It is estimated that from 50 to 60 per cent ofthe staple cotton is sold through local and resi-dent buyers, and the problem of financing themarketing there is one of financing the buyer,a topic also to be discussed in a later article.
D. SUMMARY.
Methods of financing cotton in the delta havedeveloped simultaneously with the plantationsystem of cotton farming. After the CivilWar the system in other sections of the CottonBelt was supplanted in part by the small farm,but in the alluvial soil sections of Mississippithe plantation system remained intact. Theproblem of extending credit for cotton grow-ing involves the question of financing thelarge planters, who in turn extend credit to thetenants. The planters are usually of strongfinancial standing and are able to establishcredit lines with factors, banks, and wholesalemerchants in the larger cities and do notapply for credit to the local store or localsupply merchant.
The chief problem that has confronted thefactor in extending funds for growing the crophas been to obtain adequate security. Whilethe factor has accepted chattel and realtymortgages as collateral, he has in all instancesbeen secured principally by his contract withthe planter, who bound himself to consign cot-ton to the factor to be sold on commission.Under this arrangement the factor has notalways been adequately protected againstlosses, nor has the planter always been suppliedwith sufficient funds. The violent decline incotton prices in 1920 brought great losses tothe factors and caused many of them to reducetheir advances to planters and induced othersto withdraw entirely from the business.
In the delta region the wholesale merchantssell directly to the planters, who in turn supplythe needs of tenants through the medium ofthe plantation commissary. The provision offunds for the planter, to enable him to makepayments to the wholesale merchants and tosupply his tenants on a credit basis, is gen-erally accomplished through the factor. The,recent decline of the factorage business hasresulted in the local banks and those in near-bycities being called upon to aid the planter inmaking cash purchases and to aid tne whole-sale merchants when sales are made to plant-ers on a time basis.
The problem of the hanks.—Although there arcseveral media through which credit often passesbefore reaching the planters and tenants, theentire process of financing falls heaviest onthe banks not only in the local cities of thedelta but in the larger cities of the immediateterritory. The proolem which confronts the
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 36: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1023. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 171
banks is threefold. It relates, first, to the ques-tion of financing the planter himself duringthe growing season; second, to financing thefactor and wholesale merchant; and, third, tofinancing the cotton buyer and the coopera-tive marketing association during the market-ing season. The local banks finance the grow-ing process directly through advances toplanters, while the banks in the larger cities,especially Memphis, New Orleans, and St.Louis, aid indirectly through advances to fac-tors, who in turn advance to planters in theform of cash and supplies. The city banksalso make very heavy advances to buyers.Loans by banks increase as the season pro-gresses, and those in the smaller towns reachtheir peak in the late summer—in July, August,or the early part of September.
As the crop is marketed the planters7 loansare paid and likewise their indebtedness to thefactors and wholesale merchants is reduced,so that the latter in turn reduce their indebted-ness to the banks. But as the planters beginto reduce their indebtedness tne banks arecalled upon to finance the marketing process.They supply some funds to the factors through-out the marketing season, usually from Sep-tember to January, and to the buyers andmerchants as they concentrate the cotton andhold it for shipment to American consumers orabroad. The country banks make some loansto cotton buyers, but the heaviest financing ofthe marketing falls on the city banks. Loanswhich the city banks make to the buyers pro-vide funds which are spent in the smallertowns, and thus the demands upon smallerbanks diminish, while the borrowings of thecity banks continue to mount until they reachtheir peak in late autumn and early winter—in November, December, or early January.The cooperative marketing association requiresfunds to make advances to planters for cottondelivered to it. This is a new factor in themarketing process and has been financed in
gart with funds advanced by the War Financeorporation, but in the future the problem of
extending funds to the marketing associationwill in all probability depend upon the banksfor its solution.
The burden of financing the growing andmarketing of staple cotton is often greaterthan local banks can easily support, and theyborrow considerably from the Federal Reservebank and banks located in larger ci t ies-Memphis, St. Louis, New Orleans, New Yorkand Chicago. Factors often establish credrlines in som$ of these cities when local banks
can not accommodate them fully. Some ofthe large buyers and merchants also dependupon outside banks for a considerable part ofheir funds for moving the crop. Many of
Jiese banks may in turn rediscount or borrowat the Federal lleserve banks. This providesti lonp chain of credit amounting in the aggre-gate in some years, it is estimated, to as muchus $100,000,000.
THE TREND. OF DEPARTMENT-STORESTOCKS.
A measure of the trend of merchandise stockstit retail stores is important to the retailer incomparing his own business with the averagebusiness. Furthermore, knowledge of the trend
retail stocks is of value to the wholesaler andmanufacturer, as it furnishes them with nbasis for measuring the* probable course of'uturc orders.
About 500 department stores are now re-porting the value of their stocks of goods on handto the Federal reserve banks at the end of eachmonth. For 1G0 of these stores, distributed[throughout seven Federal reserve districts,figures are available in dollar amounts sinceJanuary, 1019.1 Using the average stocks in1010 as a base, relatives have boon computedfor the groups of stores in each of these districtsund are shown in the accompanying table.
Comparison of the expansion ana contractionof department-store stocks during the four-year period shows that there has boon, on thewhole, a remarkable uniformity of movementfor these seven groups of stores. In each dis-trict during each of the four years there isnoted a regular seasonal trend—a moderateincrease in the spring months, a contraction inthe slimmer, a largo expansion in the earlyautumn, and a drastic reduction in December.In addition to this regularity of seasonal move-ment there is indicated a noticeable correspon-dence in year-to-year trend for the several dis-tricts. The trend of stocks was upward in allreporting districts throughout the year 1010.This upward movement reached a peak in theRichmond, Minneapolis, and San Franciscodistricts in the spring of 1020, while in theBoston, New York, Atlanta, and Dallas dis-tricts the upward movement continued untilthe fall months. The value of stocks declinedabruptly in all reporting districts in the monthsof November and December, 1020, and in
* For a small number of these stores it was necessary to estimate stocksfor certain months of 1919.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 37: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
172 FEDERAL EESEEVE BU3XETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
January, 1921. At the end of January, 1921,retail stocks were at the lowest level since 1919in all districts. The volume of stocks indicatesthat retailers bought very conservativelythroughout 1921 and 1922, as the value ofstocks at the fall peak of 1922 was lower thanin the fall of 1921 in the Atlanta, Minneapolis,Dallas, and San Francisco districts and smallerthan in the fall of 1920 in every reporting dis-trict. As a result of the heavy Christmastrade in 1922, stocks were much depleted, andat the end of the year were at the lowest pointsince 1919 in the Boston, Atlanta, and Minne-apolis districts.
trict. The changes in volume of stocks inthe San Francisco and Minneapolis districts,on the other hand, have been much less markedthan in other districts, and San Franciscostocks were only slightly smaller in 1922 thanin the corresponding months of 1921.
The last column of the table shows an index ofdepartment-store stocks for the United Stateswhich is constructed by combining the rela-tives for the seven reporting districts by theuse of a system of weights. The weights arethe number of persons engaged in retail tradein the various districts according to the UnitedStates Census of Occupations. In the accom-
PERCENT
180
140
120
100
80
60
LJT\
p r t
0
STOCKS AND SALES OF DEPARTMENT STORES( 1919 = 100 )
* ^ 9
•
Ai i
1 • /j
!
1
- V1/.
IfI 1
V
N
It
tit/ts
h
i i
i
•AIIIII I1 !
M
\
iii
ii
KI /
i
/ / \
» . /
;
i
•
J. F. M. A.M. J. J. A. S. 0. N. D. J. F. M. A. M. J. J. A- S. 0- N. D. J. F. M. A. M. J. J. A. S. 0. N. D. J. F. M. A. M. J. J. A. 5. 0- N. D. J. F. M
1919 1920 1921 1922
•
—__
A . M . J . J . A S . 0 . N. D
1923
PERCENT
180
160
140
100
80
60
40
20
0
The outstanding differences in movement ofstocks between sections have been differencesof degree rather than of seasonal or cyclicaltrend. The most noteworthy variations fromthe average in size of movement occurred inthe Dallas, Minneapolis, and San Franciscodistricts. Department stores in the Dallasdistrict increased their stocks much more in1920 than the stores in any other section. Asa result their stocks reached a very high peakin September, 1920, and in the succeedingpaonths a much more drastic reduction occurredin the Dallas district than in any other dis-
panying chart this index of merchandise stocksfor 160 stores is compared with an index ofdepartment-store sales. It should be notedthat stocks at any date are equal in size to threeor four months' sales, so that a 3 per cent in-crease in monthly sales would not result inmore than a 1 per cent decrease in stocks.Consequently, the fluctuations in the volumeof stocks would ordinarily be less violent thanthe fluctuations in the volume of sales.
Examination of the chart reveals certamdefinite relations between the trend of stocksand the trend of sales. Stocks regularly in-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 38: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
FEBEUAKT, 1023. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 173
crease in February and reach a peak duringApril, while sales begin to increase in Marchand reach a peak between March and May (thepeak being much influenced by the date ofEaster). Stocks usually decline in May andJune and reach a low point during July, whilesales show a similar decrease to alow point ineither July or August. Stocks are expandedin the months of August, September, andOctober, while sales expand in September andOctober, continue at aoout the October levelduring November, and rise to a very sharppeak in December. The large Christmasbusiness in December and the desire to reduceinventories at the close of the year usuallyresults in a marked reduction of stocks duringDecember and January. Sales, in turn, are
reduced to a small volume in the first twomonths of the year.
This brief summary of seasonal tendenciesshows that there arc two peaks and two troughsin the volume of both sales and stocks eachyear. The changes in volume of stocks usuallyanticipate changes in volume of sales by aboutone month, but this is more clearly the case atthe fall peak and the winter trough than at thespring peak and the summer low point.
Latest data for department-store sales andstocks disclose that sales in December reachedthe largest monthly total in the last four years,while stocks at the end of December werepractically the smallest since July, 1919. Thelarge sales and small stocks indicate an excel-lent condition of department-store business.
TREND OF DEPARTMENT STOKE STOCKS.
(Average monthly stocks, 1919-100.)
District No.1—Boston(24 stores).
District No.N
York (64stores).
District No.5—Rich-mond (19stores).
District No.G—Atlanta(9 stores).
District No.9— Minneap-
olis (10stores).
District No.11—Dallas(16 stores).
District No.12—San
Francisco(18 stores).
Index forUnited States(100 stores).
J anua ry . . . .February.. .MarchAprilMay.TuneJulyAugustSeptember.,OctoberNovember..December..
1919.
January. . ,February. . .MarchAprilMayJune.JulyAugustSeptember.,OctoberNovember..December..
1920.
January . . .February. *.MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember..October . . . .November..December..
1921.
January . . .February. . .MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember.,OctoberNovember..December..
1922.
82.784.690.092.991.187.400.008.5
113.9125.9129.9113.1
107.9115.3126.6134.0130.7123.4119.0123.9136.4140.9140.1113.6
98.299.8
106.3109.3107.1102.7100.1101.4111.611B.9125.1106.2
99.1103.2110.3111.6110.4105.7103.3103.6115.4123.4128.477.1
80.583.989.990.8S8.4R6.fi90.9
103.0116.9124.6129.9114.7
116.8128.0142.8145.1137.2131.013a 2138.0148.7149.9143.0114.7
101.4106.4114.4117.5115.4109.2105.1110.6122.4127.6130.0109.0
105.1108.5120.7121.6116.5110.4104.5109.1120.2124.5131.4110.4
SO. 579.898.689.7S3.fi83.700.4
104,1123.2129.6130.5106.3
111.1125.3149.4143.0139.8131.6130.8135.0149.2149.2137.4101.8
S7.105.4
103.4106.5104.399.797.7
104.3121.4124.5124.096.8
90.8102.4111.7110.6107.0103.799.8
105.0119.5130.3126.0103.2
92.394.304.892.488.485.1K7.499.9
113.5112.0123. A106.3
115.4125.71.10.9131.9132.7125.3130.6138.2155.3155.6144.5108.4
104.6110.4115.4117.7112.6107.6107.8112.5126.7132.1130.6104.9
10$. 1112.7130.2120.8115.4107.9108.8114.0123.7125.5128.0102.4
79.582.5Jsi.0
1012110.205.4
106.2107.4104,7114.fi115.505.9
109.8121.5128.2133.0130.8124.8119.5126.4128.4128.4123.702.5
92.504.9
100.9100.199.895.294,4
100.5105.0106.7108.292,5
92.793.3
102.4101.3100.995.890.994.499.5
102.5103.989.8
79.583.186.988.097.8W2..S91.7
109,8123.0128.1124.495.2
109.8122.3132.8136.2149.313a o155.4175.11S8.0182.2163.6103.6
95.8102,6110,1110.8117.9115.2111.8129.0137.3138.3139.2104.3
101.8113.5126.9117.7114.7105.3103.4113.4119.9123.2122.096.5
85.185.389.791.2 jSS.6 iJtf.4 !
(13.0 !105.6 !119.3 j122.9124,9109.0
111.7125.1137.3141.4137.2128.3126.8128.9133.3138.7136.3105.1
100.8104.3109.4114.4111.9108.4109.7117.8126.6127.5129.4107.6
108,4113.3120.7122,6119.110S.9109.3113.4119.121.5125.1100.0
82.ft84.790.892.0P0.7S7.291.0
116.fi123.3127.110*. ft
112.9124.2137.2130.6I3G.4128.0129.1136.0146.R148.2141.1108.9
08.4103.1109.9112.7111.0106.1104.0110.1121.3125.5127,3104.9
102.1107.2117.0116.9113.3106.9103.710S.O118,0130.1126.3100.4
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 39: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
174 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
THE FIRST THREE YEARS OF GERMANREPARATION.
PART IV.—FULFILLMENT OF THE TREATY.
In this final article of the series/ the firstpart runs parallel to the narrative of the pre-ceding article. In the latter an account wasgiven of the negotiations between Germany andthe Allies subsequent to the announcement inMay, 1921, of the schedule of payments deter-mined by the Reparation Commission. It isnow necessary to relate the measures taken infulfillment of the agreements reached betweenthe parties, and to outline the efforts made byGermany acting alone to comply therewith.The present article then summarizes and ana-lyzes the total payments made up to the endof August, 1922—their composition, theirnature, and their distribution between theAllies.
EARLY DELIVERIES.
I t will be remembered that under thetreaty of Versailles, Germany had been requiredto pay 20 billions of raid marks before May 1,1921.- The main bulk of Germany's paymentsup to that time was in the form of coal, alongwith, of course, large amounts of shipping, andother payments in kind. Even in the matterof coal, however, and under the reduced de-mands of the Spa agreement, Germany was indefault by the end of 1920. In January, 1921,the Reparation Commission called her atten-tion to a shortage of 500,000 tons up to the endof the year. Germany confessed in reply herinability to make up the deficit within thenext three months. As a matter of fact,despite the commission's subsequent demandsfor 2,200,000 tons monthly, Germany con-tinued to be increasingly in default, the deficits,however, being more or less acquiesced in bythe commission. For at this time there was aglut of coal in the European market, and theBritish coal industry was working at muchbelow its full capacity.
Including coal deliveries up to February,1921, the Germans claimed to have liquidatedthis obligation to pay 20 billions of goldmarks by May 1. The prices at which theyvalued the goods were, however, much inexcess of those allowed by the ReparationCommission, which then demanded paymentof 1 billion gold marks by March 21 and 12
1 The preceding articles appeared in the BULLETINS for November andDecember, 1922, and January, 1923. This series of articles does notdiscuss events which have occurred since October, 1922.
* See November, 1922, BULLETIN, p. 12 2, col. 2.
billions in all by May 1. Germany protestedthe impossibility of these demands and thelow values placed on their deliveries by thecommission, and demanded a mixed valuationcommission. The commission, however, re-plied by ordering the removal of the metalreserve of the Reichsbank to its branchesat Cologne and Coblenz (both of which werein the occupied area) as security for Germany'sobligations. This, and later the demand to put3 billion marks at the commission's disposalin the Bank of France before May 1, werenot carried out, Germany protesting that theremoval of practically all of the reserve (thenabout 1,092,000,000 marks) from the Reichs-bank would precipitate a panic. The Londondecision relieved Germany from an immediateobligation which she could probably in nocase have carried out the payment of thebalance of 12 billions owing before May 1.But before the end of that month 1 billion waspaid over.3 One hundred and fifty millionsof this was paid at the middle of the month ingold and foreign currency and 840 millions inthree-month treasury bills, while 10 millionswas held in Berlin at the disposal of the com-mission. During the next three months Ger-many was accumulating credits in New York,botli to meet the bills falling due and forimports of grains and food, by means of jointguaranties by German banks. ThroughoutJune, July, and August these were graduallybeing paid off, the whole transaction being com-pletea by a final shipment of 68 millions ingold to New York on August 31.
The accomplishment of this payment broughtabout an important step toward normality,the Supreme Council having agreed to lift theeconomic barrier of the Rhineland oa Septem-ber 15, provided Germany paid the amountdue by September 1 and removed the boycotton French goods.
In August, 1921, the Inter-Allied FinancialCommission met to discuss the appropriationof the 1 billion marks being paid. I t wasagreed then that it should be divided betweenGreat Britain, for the costs of her army ofoccupation, and Belgium, in part considerationof her prior claim to reparation. France, inconsideration of her receipts in kind, reJin-
auished anv claim to a share thereof, beingebited'with the value of 15 years' production
of the Saar coal fields, valued provisionally atfrom 300 to 400 millions of gold marks. These.items more than covered her occupation ex-
3 In accordance with the terms of the London settlement, see Decem-ber. 1922, BULLETIN, p. 1426, col. 1.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 40: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1023. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 175
penses. Great Britain's claim was for thedifference between costs to date of 1,200,000,000and receipts of 300,000,000. She was there-fore to receive 600,000,000 on account, thebalance of the receipts going to Belgium. Thescale of charges against Germany for occupa-tion costs was based upon man power. Thatfor France was 16 francs per day; for GreatBritain the French scale plus 2 gold marks;and for the United States the French scale plus3 gold marks per day per man.
The next payment was due on November 15,being the first export levy. This sum, how-ever, amounting to 300 millions, was easilycovered by payments in kind prior to that date.
PREPARATIONS FOR 1022 PAYMENTS.
About this time, however, it began to beperceived that Germany would have difficultyin meeting the payments due in January andFebruary of 1922. There was much discussion,particularly in German financial circles,4 as tothe possibilities of obtaining a moratorium.Accordingly, on November 5, the ReparationCommission decided to visit Berlin to study themeans of paying the pending installments andof carrying out certain plans recommended bythe guarantees committee. On December 2 atelegram was dispatched to Berlin urging theGovernment to pay full attention to the matterof preparing for tfie payments due on January15 and February 15. This communication wasimportant in that it asserted that Germany'sdifficulties were financial rather than economic.The Government, it charged, had failed to taketimely steps to balance the budget, the resultbeing that Government expenditures had beenmet in increasing proportions by credits fromthe Reichsbank, involving continuous. expan-sion of the fiduciary note issue* The immediateoutcome was the appointment by ChancellorWirth of a commission concerned with directdealing with foreign security brokers to obtainforeign credits to meet the German obligationsimmediately pending. These cash obligations,exclusive of deliveries in kind, were estimatedat 400 millions of gold'marks on January 15and 240 millions on February 15, the latterbeing the export levy.
Some days later the Chancellor dispatched alengthy memorandum on the subject to thecommission. It asserted that reparation pay-ments were dependent on the flotation of aforeign loan. It was well known that HerrRathenau had been negotiating for some time
past with London financiers with this object inview. These negotiations, however, had brokendown with the assurance that, in view of thereparation claims of future years, such a loancould not be raised in England, either as along-dated loan or as a short-dated bank credit.Hence it was impossible to make full paymentof the January and February installments.Apart from deliveries in kind anil receipts underthe British reparations recovery act, Germanycould not- procure for these payments more than150 to 200 millions of gold marks. The com-mission was therefore requested to extend thetime limit for payment. The note closed witha very significant passage: "The Government,"it said, " confines itself to this request, althoughit realizes that similar difficulties will arise inconnection with subsequent payments."
In its consideration of this note the commis-sion recognized that under the circumstancesthere existed only three ways of making thepayments. First* Germany might make use ofthe money held abroad by German nationals.The objection to this method ^yas, however,that the German Government might well pro-test she had no power to acquire these balances.Second, payment might be made out of thegold reserve in the Keichsbank,- which now,after the last payments, stood at only slightlymore than 1 billion marks. It was, of course,true that as a reserve this sum was almost use-less, representing as it did only 1 per cent of thenote issue. Nevertheless it was felt that eventhis amount of gold is of great importance inany future rehabilitation of German currency.The third course was to buy foreign exchangewith paper marks sold abroad, and the Jesuitsof such a procedure were patent to all observers.
TAXATION AND 1NTKKNAL KKFOUMS IN !'»i!2.
While the Cannes Conference was proceed-ing, the commission conferred with Germandelegates and granted a provisional postpone-ment 5 of the January and February payments,on certain very definitely prescribed conditions.Germany was to pay in lieu thereof 31 millionsof gold marks every 10 days, beginning January16, these continuing until the Allies shoulddecide on a more permanent scheme. But,furthermore, Germany was to submit within14 days a plan of reforms and guaranties forthe budget and the currency and for repara-tion payments. This scheme would supply thestarting point for the elaboration of the Allies'plans.
& Sec January BULLETIN, p. 32, col. 2.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 41: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
176 FEDERAL EESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
On January 26 Chancellor Wirth announcedin the Eeichstag the Government's taxationproposals. These included a compulsory loanof 1 billion gold marks, bearing interest onlyafter a period of three years, abandonment ofthe taxes on post-war profits and impositionof a 2 per cent business tax, and raising of theduties on coal and sugar and the property,capital, and corporation taxes.
The German reply to the conditions imposedby the commission asked for a general reduc-tion in the cash payments, accompanied, ifnecessary, by an increase in deliveries in kind.To this end Germany was walling to conclude,with other powers, agreements along the lineof that made with France at Wiesbaden. Thecommission was also asked to permit the ex-penses of occupation to be credited to the totalsum in cash and kind paid in 1922. The notepointed out that the recurring periodical pay-ments in foreign currency greatly hamperedthe efforts being made to put the Germanfinances in order; and proceeded to outline themeasures of reform and guaranties proposed.An internal loan was to be raised, as well as aforced loan, in order to reduce the floating debt.Further, since recovery to the extent neces-sary to pay reparation obligations was im-possible without a restoration of the world'sconfidence in Germany, the Allies were askedto assist in floating an external loan for her.Strong measures, such as the abolition of theobligation to secrecy imposed on the banks,would be taken to prevent the removal ofcapital out of the country and the evasion oftax payments. The postal and telegraph sys-tems were to be reformed and food subsidieswere to be cut from 2\ billions of paper marksto 1 billion in 1922, thus tending further toincrease the cost of living. In place of theexisting unemployment relief system, insuranceat the expense of employees and employed wasto be instituted. The ordinary budget nowshowed an estimated surplus of 16£ billions 6
(paper) toward reparation payments.The evils of currency speculation had by
this time become apparent, and accordingly alaw was passed in March to check exchangespeculation in Germany. Only through cer-tain recognized exchange banks, including theReichsbank, might dealings in exchange beundertaken. Even these banks were only per-mitted to sell foreign exchange after havingobtained information as to the buyer's purposeand furnished a statement thereof to the taxcollector.
• Revenue, 103 billions; expenditure, £6* billions.
In answer to the German note, the Repara-tion Commission on March 21 announced its1922 program of 720 millions (gold marks) incash and 1,450 millions (gold marks) in goods.Germany had fulfilled her obligations underthe 10-day installment plan, paying in all 282millions. The commission, therefore, demand-ed 18 millions on April 15, 50 millions monthlyfrom May 15 to October 15, inclusive, and 60millions on November 15 and December 15.
This demand being a material reduction fromthe London schedule, certain conditions wereimposed upon which the granting of the partialmoratorium was dependent. These were inthe form of specific obligations. Germany wasto raise an additional 60 billions of papermarks in the coming fiscal year, of which 40billions were to be raised in 1922. An internalloan, which must not take the form of treasurybills discounted at the Reichsbank, and whichmust be of sufficient amount to balance thebudget, must be raised. Plans for this loanwere to be submitted before April 30. Theflight of capital was to be stopped. TheReichsbank must be made independent andthe prewar system of economic and financialstatistics reinstated. Expenditures were to beradically reduced and Germany was to submitto a system of supervision tln:ough obligatoryconsultations with the guarantees committee.Lastljr, Germany must either float an inter-national loan or make a levy on the personaland real property of its citizens in order toraise a substantial sum for reparation. Thecommission reserved the right to revoke themoratorium if at any time Germany shouldcease to comply with these conditions.
In his speech in the Reichstag on March 28,referring to the Allies' demands, ChancellorWirth was very insistent upon the outrightimpossibility of raising a further 60 billions intaxation and mentioned that "the cost of thearmies of occupation and control commissions,where there was nothing to control, was anexceedingly heavy burden on Germany."While the suggestion of economic and financialsupervision was flatly rejected, Germany wouldcertainly proceed to stringent economies in theGovernment departments. In the course ofthe speech 14 new taxes were proposed, aswell as the forced loan of 1 billion gold marks,these being enacted early in April. The finalterms of the loan, as adopted by the Reichsrathin May, were for the payment of no interestup to October, 1925, and 4 per cent thereafter.
Most of these points were contained in thereply sent to the commission. The inability of
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 42: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 177
Germany to raise the extra 60 billions de-manded was reiterated, as was the refusal ofconsent to control of revenues and expendi-tures. Again it was emphasized that the onlymeans of acquiring currency to meet the repa-ration payments was by aforeign loan. Thecommission, however, insisted on the executionof the measures laid down by them. Never-theless, it expressed its willingness "to considerany plan which the German Government might* * * propose, giving a reasonable prospectof dealing satisfactorily with the whole of thebudget deficit." Coupled with the adherenceto its previous decision was a threat7 by thecommission to exact penalties on May 31.Forthwith, therefore, Germany paid, on April21, the first installment of 18 millions, and onMay 16 the second of 50 millions.
In accordance with the commission's de-mands, Germany, at the end of May, set forthbefore it the steps taken toward the requiredfinancial reforms. The autonomy 01 theReichsbank had been assured by the act ofMay 25, withdrawing from the Governmentthe right of direct intervention in the conductof the bank's operations, and the publicationof statistics, as in pre-war days, reinstated.Economies of 24£ billions, as compared with the1921 appropriations, had already been effected.With regard to financial control, Germanyacquiesced in control by the commission ofrevenues and expenditures, provided it did notinfringe on German sovereignty or violatesecrecy as to the fortunes and incomes of tax-payers. Furthermore, Germany agreed toconfer with the guarantees committee to workout suitable measures to stop the flight ofcapital. To this reply the commission gaveits approval, and the partial moratorium wasformally granted. Germany met the 50 mil-lions installment due on June 15 by deposits inParis, London, and Brussels.
NEGOTIATIONS FOR AN INTERNATIONAL LOAN.
In the meantime the commission had takenthe step of appointing a subcommittee of ex-perts to examine the possibilities of an inter-national loan for Germany. The membersappointed to this " bankers' committee, as itwas popularly but improperly termed, wereSignor 5'Ameglio (Italy); M, Delacroix (Bel-gium), chairman; Sir R. Kindersley (GreatBritain); Dr. G. Vissering (Holland)• Mr. J. P ;Morgan (United States); and M. Ch. Sergent
' "The commission would be obliged to exact penalties/' was thactual wording used.
(France). The committee met on May 24 and,owing to a certain indefiniteness in its termsof reference,8 requested from the commission amore precise definition of them. With regardto the most vital matter—that of the repara-tion payments—a majority of the commissionsaw no object to the committee's suggestingsuch readjustments as it thought a necessaryincident to the proposed loan. This decisionwas concurred in by the British, Belgian, andItalian delegates and was personally agreedto by the American unofficial observer, butunanimity was prevented by the dissension ofthe French member. It was this fact whichrendered the committee's work more or lessabortive.
The committee pointed out in its final reportthat had the commission named a definitelimit to any reduction of reparation paymentsit could have proceeded on its investigationsupon a more stable basis. Failing this, had itbeen invited to name a limit to the paymentswhich they thought necessary to any internalloan they would have done so. Such limitwould merely have represented what popularopinion would judge to bo well within Ger-many's capacity to pay. For want of eitherof these prerequisites of useful inquiry, thecommittee felt it could not usefully continueits discussions in response to the majority invi-tation of the commission, the reasons beingtwofold. First, France, being Germany's big-gest creditor and also the dissenting memberof the commission, the committee could notwell proceed with its deliberations against thedesire of France. Second, an unfavorable at-mosphere for desirable achievement had beencreated by the dissensions in the commission.
The question was then taken up: Was a loanpossible under circumstances of the presentschedule of payments ? The reply was in thenegative, the avenue of approach to the prob-lem being the possibility of various classes ofinvestors becoming interested in such a loan.Underlying the whole question was the in-ability of Germany to give sufficient security.The investing public, lacking confidence inGermany's capacity to pay, and in her "willand intention to do so, was at the presenttime in fear of social upheaval in Germany.Passing on, then, the committee found that"investors in the United States and Great
• According to Mr. J. P. Morgan there was a difference between theFrench and English texts of the terms of reference. "This diitcrencetouched the very root of the matter in that the French reading definitelyprohibited the committee giving consideration of the schedule of pay-ments as now determined * * *. The English text, on the otherhand, was susceptible of a broader interpretation."
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 43: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
178 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
Britain would find no real attraction in a loanto Germany which was not calculated to pro-mote the permanent settlement of the repara-tion problem." At the same time, neutral in-vestors would not be attracted, owing to theirhaving suffered heavy losses in exchange spec-ulation and industrial competition through thedepreciation of the mark. And lastly, a loanwould be difficult to raise in France, becauseonly a part of it would find its way directlyback to France in reparation payments.Clearly, then, what all this amounted to wasan opinion, necessarily circumlocutory, that noloan could be floated without a radical reduc-tion of the present schedule of payments ofreparation.
The report went on to offer some generalobservations. An essential condition of anyloan to Germany was that the investing publicshould feel Germany was doing her best tostabilize her finances. To this end the removalof uncertainty regarding reparation paymentswas essential. Mere leniency, without a mod-ification of the total obligation, was not enough.Then, again, in order to attract the Americaninvestor, the loan would have to be raised atthe unanimous request of the Allies. This isparticularly interesting, in view of the state-ment that a loan might be impracticable unlessit were preliminary to other financial adjust-ments, such as adjustments of the externalindebtedness of the Allies.
From this report M. Ch. Sergent dissented,submitting that "he could not, in order to pro-mote a loan, contemplate new limitations onGermany's liability which did not appear tohim justifiable, nor any diminution whatsoeverof the rights of France recognized by the treaty."
The results of the committee's work were,then, in a tangible sense disappointing. Never-theless, they did, at least to some extent, putbefore the world the enormous difficulties,based on national economic circumstances,with which those attempting an all-round set-tlement were faced. On the one hand was thenecessity of providing for the rebuilding of thedevastated areas and their restoration to theirpre-war productive capacity. On the otherwas the desire to restore the old freedom ofeconomic intercourse and revival of Europeanmarkets. Not confined to Europe, there wasthe further problem of reimbursing the UnitedStates for the financial assistance rendered bothduring and after the war to the allied nations.The impossibility under these circumstances ofnegotiating an international loan for Germanyin itself added to the difficulties of the situation.
PROPOSALS FOR FINANCIAL SUPERVISION.
Following the receipt of the report the com-mission on June 14 advised Germany to pre-pare measures to establish reasonable limita-tions of the Reichsbank's right to issue. Thecommittee on guarantees, in conjunction withthe German Ministry of Finance, had in themeantime appointed four subcommittees toinvestigate^ respectively, revenues and ex-penditures, the smuggling of capital out ofGermany, the German floating debt, and im-ports and exports and industrial data and sta-tistics. The result was the urgent call to theReparation Commission to take steps to stopan imminent financial collapse in Germany, andthe Fischer-Schroeder mission to confer withthe commission.9 The formal request for a 2\-year moratorium on cash payments was pre-sented on July 12, and decision thereon de-ferred pending receipt of the full report of theguarantees committee.
Following the payment of the 32 millions ofgold marks, mainly in the form of dollarexchange, on July 15 Chancellor Wirth, in anote to the Reparation Commission dated July22, accepted certain further measures of finan-cial control for the period of the expected mora-torium. Representatives of the guaranteescommittee were to supervise all departments,particularly those dealing with revenue andexpenditure, the movement of capital, and thepublication of economic and financial statistics.Daily statements of the floating debt, dailyreports on the Government's financial position,moiithly accounts of the progress of tax col-lections, the receipts from customs, post offices,railroads, telegraphs, etc., and quarterly re-sumes of receipts and expenditures under thecurrent budget were to be rendered to the com-mittee. In addition, the committee was to befurnished with budget estimates, copies of allfinancial bills, and applications for supple-mentary budget credits. Statistics of foreigntrade, inland and international transportation,and steel production were also to be supplied.The export of capital was to be severely penal-ized. A special department was to be set upin the Finance Ministry to pass upon all re-quests for the export of capital, and only thoseauthorized were to be permitted to engage inthe export trade. All these measures of finan-cial control were to come into effective opera-tion on November 1.
At this point a new element enters into thenegotiations, for in reply to the German Gov-
•See January BULLETIN, p. 33.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 44: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL. RESERVE BULLETIN. 179
ernmentJs expression of its intention to sus-pend payments to the clearing house, theFrench Government on August 1 made publica note threatening ''measures of retortion7'unless assurances were given by August 5 thatthe £2,000,000 due on August 15 would be paid.
Fearing the nature of these measures, theGerman banks, early in July, removed theirParis balances to banks in Holland andSwitzerland. Failing to give the required as-surances, the "measures of retortion" wereinaugurated on August a5. These took the formof the suspension of adjustments then proceed-ing of claims between French and German na-tionals, the payments to Germans for war lossesin Alsace-Lorraine, the arbitration of disputedclaims, the liquidation of German property,the restitution of the household effects of Ger-mans formerly resident in Alsace-Lorraine.Further, all German property in Alsace-Lor-raine was placed under seal, France having theright to sell it should Germany fail to resumepayments to French citizens.
'On the due date only £500,000 of theagreed payments was handed over to theFrench and British clearing offices. At theLondon conference just closed, however, ithad been agreed that payment must be madewithin one month, and that separate agree-ments should be made subsequently betweenGermany and the several Governments, withthe approval of the Reparation Commission.Germany eventually failed to meet the balanceof the August payment (£1,500,000) due onSeptember 15, and, as already noted,10 onOctober 23 was freed from further payments un-der the clearing-house scheme until July, 1923.
In the meantime the guarantees committeehad completed its report, making its recom-mendations to the Reparation Commissionon July 28. I t suggested the eliminationfrom the budget of 30 billions of marks(paper) unnecessary expenditure, the levyingof a series of new and increased taxes, and theraising of an international loan, to be sharedin equally by the Allies and Germany. Inorder to deal with the flight of capital, amatter causing increasing anxiety, the com-mittee suggested supplementary measures tothose of December, 1920, and March, 1922,already in force. Regular payments, in theordinary course of business, might be madewith a chamber of commerce authorization;but otherwise all payments abroad must besanctioned by a foreign office vise, im-porters who could be shown to have held tiie
10 See January BULLETIN, p. 35.
proceeds of exports abroad intentionally,and to the detriment of German economiclife, should not be allowed to engage in anyfurther exporting without special "permission.Heavy penalties were to be levied for infrac-tions of the rules.
To these measures, aimed at preventing theexport of capital, wore added others in thepresidential decree of October 12. In addi-tion to the rules mentioned, regarding thepurchase of foreign currency, banks weredebarred from purchasing foreign currenciesexcept from sucn person who signed a docu-ment explaining his identity and the natureof his transaction. Permissible transactionsdid not include speculation or the use of foreigncurrency as an investment. Furthermore,the fixing of domestic prices in foreign cur-rency—a practice which had grown commonwith, the rapidly falling purchasing powerof the mark—was forbidden.
The decision of the Reparation Commissionpostponing further cash payments due in1922, and the agreement reached betweenBelgium and Germany in September, calledfor deliveries of German treasury bills in largoamount. Accordingly, on September 25 theGerman Government handed over to the Repa-ration Commission 90 millions of gold marksin treasury bills, guaranteed by the Reiclis-bank, payable at the bank of England. Thisamount was in respect of the August and Sep-tember payments, the balance of 4 millionsbeing credited in respect of merchandise. Sub-sequently the Belgian Government announcedthat these bills had been discounted at English,American, and Swiss private banks. Furtherpayments were made in accordance with the plan.THE PAYMENTS—THEIR NATURE AND DIS-
TRIBUTION.
At this time the latest published accountof the Reparation Commission showed totalpayments by Germany, up to August 31, 1922,amounting to nearly 1\ billions of gold marks,made up as follows:
[Thousands of gold marks.J
(a) On pre-May 1, 1921, army costs and coaladvances account.
6) On capital debt account) O o t M a y 11921 arm\cj On post-May 1,1921, army costs account... 2G
?d) On schedule of payments account:* On Installments due to Aug. 15,1922 \ 1,9,'
Payments Balancemade. owing.
2,621,6502,50-1,342
268,190
952,923On installments falling due"Oct. 15 j ' 38,023
Total | 7,385,12$
913,084134,999,058
50,100
1,049,153*3S023
137,580,032
i Credit.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 45: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
180 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
Of the amount paid, 21 per cent was in theform of gold and foreign currencies, 45 percent in deliveries in kind, and 34 per cent inState properties in ceded territories. Thefollowing are the actual figures (in thousandsof gold marks):I. Gold and foreign currencies:
Co) Direct payments 1,447,814(b) Receipts from other sources on German
account—1. Payment by Denmark re Schleswig-
Holstein cession 65,0002. Destroyed war material sold 44,6923. Sundry-items 4,738
114,430Total 1,562,244
II. Deliveries in kind (provisional figures):fa) To allied and associated powers 3,260,878(6) Sold to Luxemburg, Textile Alliance of
United States, e t c . . . . 57,6643,318,542
III. State properties in ceded territories (provisionaland incomplete figures); exclusive of Schleswig-Holstein cession in I (6) 1 2,504,342
Total : 7,385,128
Of the deliveries in kind the most importantin point of amount were (a) rolling stockhanded over under the armistice convention;(6) coal, coke, and lignite; and (c) ships; con-stituting 25, 26, and 21 per cent, respectively,of the total amount. Omitting deliveries underthe armistice convention, coal, etc., has com-prised 40 per cent of the deliveries and ships33 per cent. The full details of the deliveriesare given below (in thousands of gold marks):Under armistice convention:
Abandoned war material 317 804Holling stock (127,039 wagons, 4,553 locomotives) 826 653Motor lorries (4,959) . . 17509Fixed railway material (1,896 metric tons) 2 461Agricultural material •„ . . . . 22 709
Louvain library " \ i '4 5 1
Proceeds of reparation recovery act . . . . . . . . . 1147744Under Annex III: '
Ships (2,593,057 gross tons) 706,129Inland water craft and installations . 24 836
Under Annex IV: 'Reconstruction material . . . . 19 810Live stock (99,300 horses, 175,439 cattle, 218,076 sheep",
21,064 goats. 4*5.688 poultry) ' . . „ . ' . „ 157,073Miscellaneous under Annexes II and IV 110 268Under Annex V: '
Coal, coke, and lignite (actual tonnage, 41,019,432 metrictons; coke, converted tonnage, 45,760,053 metric tons).. 776,618
Coal, credit in suspense . 30 970By-products of coal (121,855 metric tons) Y.'.Y.Y.Y.'. 22,855Dyestuffs (17*363,990 kilograms) 46937Pnarmaceuticalproducts (753.775 kilograms) 12 813
TinderiAnnex VII: Submarine cables....! 49Jo6oMiscellaneous SfiSales by Reparation Commission:C(2?k-Cn, ?' a n d . ttgoite t 0 Luxemburg (actual tonnage,
2,52o,314 metric tons; coke, converted tonnage, 3,406.387metnctons) ' * 50 074
Dvestuffs to United States Textile Alliance '(2.34L497kilograms) * ' A ZAA
Dyestuffs to German buyers (626,805 kilograms)..!!!"!."! 3,' 026T o t a l 3,318,542
In the final table below there is shown thedivision of the receipts amongst the variouspowers:
DISTRIBUTION OF RECEIPTS.
[Thousands of gold marks.]
United StatesBritish EmpireFranceItalyJapanBelgiumOther powers
TotalCession to—
F r a n c e—S a a r(provisional)...
Poland (provis-ional)..;.
Danzig (provis-ional)....
Other items in sus-pense and undis-tributed assets:
Pre-MaylPost-May 1
Total
Cash and deliveries inkind.
In repay-ment of
net armycosts and
coaladvances.
159,4912 955,161
* 1,322,70939,106
254,640
2,631,107
Uponreparationaccount.
14i*922"101,013157,723
8,9781,208,202
136,627
1,754,465
Cessionsof State
propertieson repara-
tion ac-count.
538*2,042
59,000635
6,031
68,246
Totaldebits.
59,4911,097,6211,425,764
196,82967,978
1,463,477142,658
4,453,818
300,000
l,730,5S2
305,514
563,28944,350
7,397,553
11,007,283,000 gold marks still unpaid.* 60,159,000 gold marks still unpaid.* 155,635,000 gold marks still unpaid.
Reverting now to the figures of total pay-ments, it is found that 39 per cent of the totalwas absorbed bv the expenses of occupationand the coal advances made under the Spaagreement. If to the actual amount paid onthis account be "added the amount still owing,the full expenses of occupation and coal ad-vances are equal to 56 per cent of the pay-ments.
Another important fact is that up to August31, 1922, Germany had reduced the capitalsum owing by her by little more than 1 billiongold marks. This result of the early years ofpayment is made still less encouraging by thelarge proportion of the total payments whichconsist of the handing over of capital goods.What might be callea "current payments"—that is, payments out of current production—amount to only 65 per cent of the total, or4,766,356,000 gold marks. So that apartfrom cessions of State property, etc., the capitaldebt would have stood on August 31, 1922, atjust about the amount at which it was fixedon May 1, 1921. Such, in a word, is the netresult, from Germany's point of view, of theevents outlined in the preceding series ofarticles.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 46: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 181
ADDENDUM—PAYMENTS UNDER OTHERTREATIES.
Treaty of Neuilly.—The inter-allied com-mission appointed under the treaty with Bul-garia 12 began an investigation into the eco-nomic condition of the country in the springof 1921, the result being the postponement ofcash payments for one year. A further partialmoratorium was proposed, subject .to certainguaranties. These being unacceptable in to to,the commission announced, on July 21, 1922,that the full provisions of the treaty hadagain come into force, and that the 112,500,000gold francs already due therefore became pay-able immediately. The annuity payable underthe treaty amounts to about 131,000,000 goldfrancs (about 3 | billions of leva at presentrates of exchange). The payments made up toAugust 31, 1922,13 are as follows:
[Millions of leva.]
Nov. 11,1918, to Aug. 9,1920Aug. 9,1920, to Apr. 1,1921Apr. 1,1921, to Aug. 31,1922Private reclamations from Nov. 11, 1918, to Aug.
31 1922 .
Total
Alliedarmy; inBulgaria.
2S5.G6.7
14.0
108.1
414.4
Variousallied
commis-sions.
22.053.8
111.8
187.6
Thus, the Bulgarian Government has al-ready paid about 600 millions of leva on occu-pation and control, an amount estimated 13
to be equivalent to some 2 millions of poundssterling. In addition, there is still owing overand above these amounts a sum of 120 millionsof leva in respect of the military mission ofcontrol. Up to May 31, 1922, deliveries inkind had been made valued at the followingamounts:
Millions ofleva.Railway material 250.0Coal delivered to Serbia : - • • 19o. 0Cattle delivered fo Serbia, Greece, and Rumania.. 162.5
Total., M7.5
Treaty of St. Germain.1*—The subcommitteeof the Reparation Commission appointed todeal with the case of Austria began its work inNovember, 1919. In this case, however, thecommission has been concerned, not so muchwith securing payments, but with extending
u See November, 1922, BULLETIN, p . 1295.13 According to the London Economist, Nov. 18,19£J." See November, 1922, BULLETIN, pp. I29o, 1296.
30425—23 4
the relief which from time to time appearednecessary for Austria's rehabilitation.
Ajmrt from tho periodic extensions of creditthe first important stop to this end was takenin May, 1921, when a delegation, consisting ofMM. Avenol (French) and Gliickstadt (Danish)and Sir Drummond Fraser (British), submittedto the financial committee of the League ofNations a scheme of financial restoration. Itwas proposed to set up a new bank of issue,with one-half foreign capita], to be given a25-year monopoly of note issue. The essentialconditions for the inauguration of the schemeincluded the suspension for at least 20 yearsof liens told on Austrian assets in respect ofreparation and relief credits. Great Britainand France thereupon agreed to accept adelay of 20 years in pressing their liens derivedfrom the treaty of St. Germain.
During the early months of 1922 negotiationswere proceeding for loans abroad, to be raisedin England, Czechoslovakia, Italy, and France,but no success had been met with in attemptsto secure financial aid from tho United States.In June the Reparation Commission announcedits preparedness to release for 20 years therevenue from State forests, salt mines, anddomains as security for the new bank, and itsapproval in principle of the liberation of thecustoms and tobacco monopoly, to be used assecurity for a foreign loan. The actual releaseof the assets was communicated by the com-mission on August 5.
On September 20 the League authorized theraising of a loan by Austria up to 560 millionsof gold crowns to meet the estimated budgetdeficits for the next two years. The internalfinancial reforms were to be controlled by aLeague of Nations committee, consisting ofrepresentatives of Great Britain, France, Cze-choslovakia, and Italy.
Early in October these powers entered intoan agreement assuring the maintenance oftho territorial sovereignty and integrity of*Austria, and that no economic or financialmeasures would be taken to threaten her inde-pendence. The loan to Austria was not toexceed 650 millions of gold francs, and the fourpowers were to guarantee the service of theannuity of the loan up to 80 per cent. Austriaon her side agreed on financial reforms, thepledging of the customs and tobacco monopolyas security for the loan, and to dispose of noneof the proceeds of the loan without the per-mission of a commissioner-general, appointedby the League of Nations,
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 47: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
182 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS ABROAD.A NEW STATISTICAL SUMMARY.
In this issue of the BULLETIN there is published for the first time a condensed summarytable of basic foreign statistics designed to showthe trend of business in the United Kingdom,France, and Germany. For purposes of com-parison a column has been added giving similarfigures for the United States, wherever possi-ble. The items selected have been groupedunder three broad heads: (1) Credit; (2) pricesand exchange; and (3) production and trade.For detailed information in regard to thesources from which the data have been ob-tained, reference-should be made to page 184 ofthis issue.
The object in view has been to select fromthe mass of diverse statistical data publishedin the four countries such items as would beindicative of business trends and at the sametime be reasonably comparable between theseveral countries. The limitations of the fig-ures from the point of view of exact compari-son are many and various, since the methodsof collecting and classifying somewhat similardata frequently differ in different countries.More important still, aside from all questionsof statistical exactness, it should be remem-bered that the same item has different degreesof importance in reflecting conditions in differ-ent countries. Thus, for instance, foreigntrade is a better business index for the UnitedKingdom than for France. Moreover, in inter-preting the changes from month to month itshould not be forgotten that seasonal influencesare to some extent responsible for the fluctua-tions of certain of the items.
Since the accompanying table is designed toshow trends in business rather than the absoluteamounts of items at a given time, the data areshown as relatives on a 1913 base (i. e., the1913 monthly average is taken as 100) whereversufficient data are available. In other casesthe actual absolute figures are used and thatfact is indicated by the word "actuals" aftereach item. It will be obvious from what hasbeen said about the comparability of the dataof different countries that comparisons fromcountry to country in a single month are notparticularly significant. In using the figures,therefore, it is the trend of an item for onecountry from month to month which should becompared with the trend of a somewhat simi-lar—but usually not strictly comparable—item
for another country. That is, the figures inthe table should generally be read verticallyand the trends observed before comparisonsare made from country to country.
The accompanying figures, although by nomeans complete, may be used as indicators ofeconomic conditions in the countries consid-ered. They reflect the expansion and contrac-tion of credit, the increase and decrease ofprices, the movement and exchange of goods,and the condition of employment. Thus, forexample, it is possible to trace the easing ofcredit in the United Kingdom during 1922 bythe fall in loans and deposits and the loweringof the discount rate from 5 per cent to 3 percent between January and July. The Frenchcommercial banks, on the other hand, show again both in loans and deposits, though thechange from 1921 is not great. Throughout1922 money rates remained comparativelyhigh in France, the Bank of France changingits discount rate only once. In Germany theenormous increase in the Reichsbank discountsand note issues, in spite of the sharp rise inthe discount rate frpm 5 to 10 per cent duringthe second half of 1922, indicates extremeinflation and highly depreciated currency. Thestatistics for the United States, showing thedefinite turn toward a larger volume of de-posits, discounts, and note issues in the middleof the year, differ markedly from the data foreither England or France. In the field ofproduction and trade the increased activitywhich has been going on in the United King-dom and France, as well as in the UnitedStates, is clearly reflected by the data herepresented. The figures for Germany are notso clear or conclusive by reason of the disturb-ing factor of progressive currency inflation.Nevertheless, snipping displayed much greateractivity at German ports in 1922 than in theprevious year, and the lower unemploymentfigures for 1922 indicate also greater industrialactivity.
In general, a study and comparison of thevarious figures shows unmistakably an increaseof business and industrial activity during thepast year in these countries. A somewhat de-tailed analysis of credit and business situationin England and France during 1922 will befound below. Similar studies of conditions inGermany and Italy will be presented in theMarch issue of the BULLETIN.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 48: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
FEBRUAKY, 1023. FEDERAL EESEUVE BULLETIN. 83
THE TREND OF BUSINESS ABROAD.1
Items.UnitedKing-dom.
1,2071 1271,1911.19611921,0551,0561,0331,0311,031
1,8101,7101,7851,6021,8261,7371,7301,C861,6671,085
5,107ftC41
3,132.3,27212,728[3,37513,03013,13913,181^3,549
,2,749!2,93312,57513,01912,88013,01513,06313,527
8,00152,203^3,667'8,461'2,248'1,435tf,936% 158
452447434416408405400388390405
3,0682,8842,7692,4732,3922,580 !2,1032,1522,8182,401
37,91338,21136,94137,15436,43335,78736,05036,69436,11436,359
536181
100128158216578919
1,607
617t792
115140190469754
1,'28C
I. CREDIT (Actuals).COMMERCIAL B A N K LOANS:
1921—January . .AmilJulyOctober
1922—JanuaryAprilJuly
' October ,NovemberDecember *
COMMERCIAL BANK DEPOSITS;1921—January
AprilJulyOctober
1922—JanuaryApril . . . . . . . . . . : . . .July : . . -OctoberNovember *December
CENTRAL'BANK DISCOUNTS:1921—January
AprilJ u l y . . . . . .October
1922—JanuaryAprilJulyOctoberNovemberDecember
CENTRAL B A N K N O T E ISSUES:1921—January
April •JulyOctober
1922—JanuaryAprilJulyOctoberNovember.December.. •
CENTRAL B A N K DISCOUNT RATE (p.ci.):1921—January.
AprilJulyOctober
1922—January.. - -A p r i l . .JulyOctober,
1 N o v e m b e r . . . .December
I I . P R I C E S AND EXCHANGE.WHOLESALE P R I C E INDEX (relatives):
1921 average1922 average1922—January -
A p r i l . . . .JulyOctoberNovemberDecember.:
RETAIL P R I C E INDEX (relatives):1921 average1922 average1922—January
AprilJulyOctoberNovem berDecember V
FOREIGN EXCHANGE (per cent of par)'.1921—January.
AprilJu ly .October.
1922—January.AprilJuly-OctoberNovember,December. t
i the units employed in this table ate listed
Ger-many.
20116717C167171163165165
226183192182184178180 jISO
321298285299307294307315
33730131930t297290297305
Jnited |Itates. Herns.
12,95612,24911,60211,42210,91910,81610,73911,249 ,11,219 I11,329
10,04310,13810,00210,19210,27110,67611,04311,16211,09111,255
2,4562,0641,6501,309
850500380
'169614630
3,0912,8302,5382,4092,1842,1582,1272,2992,3302,464
77
2,13032,7154,2176,7039,10243,22394,492.66,495
1,19913,433
1,8253,1754,99C
19,5G4 ,40,017 !61,156
III. PRODUCTION AND THADE.
Via IRON PRODUCTION (relatives):1921 average k1922 average ,1922—January
AprilJulyOctoberNovemberDecember *
UnitedKing-dom.
1481571421491651G5164164
153142142139J42143145147
COAL PRODUCTION (relatives): \1921 average |1922 average i1922—January. |
A p r i l . . . .July. iOctober ;November —December • j
UNEMPLOYMENT:3 j1921 average1922 average1922—January
AprilJulyOctoberNovemberDecember
BANK CLEARINGS (aduaU):1921 average1922 average1922—January
AprilJulyOctoberNovember —December
SHIPPING ACTIVITY (relatives):1921 average1922 average1922—January
AprilJulyOctober...N ovemberDecember
VALUE OF EXPORTS (actuals):1921 average1922 average1922—January
AprilJulyOctoberNovemberDecember •
VOLUME OF EXPORTS {relatives):1921 average1922 average1922—January
AprilJulyOctoberNovemberDecember
VALUE OF IMPORTS (actuals):1921 average1922 average '1922—January
AprilJulyOctoberNovember '.December
VOLUME OF IMPORTS (relatives):1921 average1922 average • • -1922-January
AprilJuly -OctoberNovemberDecember . . -
13. s13.316.2H.412.312.012.412.2
2,9113,0973,3993, Mi3,23f>3,1242,9S92,709
.hi8809748599
10091
58,60050,0115314755,50S>0,41960,39013,4918,883
7288
11U
m
10190
103U3
Ger-many.
20,0711,0794, CwS2.447
«tt2722HT)414
55052548'J411502
rw7S3630
S3
9011G107113
90,45883,66076,48880,661SI,78485,01595,60094,912
1,7981,8901,0391,9031,4331,9371,7003,079
74102
8593
105111111132
1,9621,9921,4881,7441,9952,1092,3482,923
9111692
1031151231213:
lor,
170243789
1,404
6792749490
10889«8
UnitedStates.
04829)
lot111121
85
m4043
m114117
84KS949ft
33132532ft3372902.
r).
!i
42:1
2829333527252529
51733050868.5532533590
3061138487991
1.V9W10,02.1I.%h7215,07110,343IS, 42*17,133ID, rm
no12089
109141J35139109
373,760319,316278,898318,100301,313370,720380,0523H4a5
10010195
10695
12011297
209,085
71
217,195217,073252,12S319,000
16016918S
2 For January.a For the Dnited States an
index of employment, instead of unemployment, U shewn.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 49: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
184 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
THE TREND OF BUSINESS ABROAD—SOURCES.
The sources from which the summary tableon the preceding page has been compiled aregiven below:
I. CREDIT.Commercial bank loans.
United Kingdom.—Discounts and advances of the nineLondon clearing banks, expressed in millions of poundssterling.
France.—The following items of three commercial banks,expressed in millions of francs:
Comptoir National d'Escompte: (a) Portefeuille etbons de la Defense Nationale; (6) Reports (stock exchangeloans); (c) Correspondants; (d) Comptes courants debiteurs;(e) Avances sur garanties.
Socie'te' Ge'ne'rale pour Favoriser le DeVeloppement duCommerce et de Tlndustrie en France: (a) Portefeuille;Effets (bills) et bons de la Defense Nationale; (b) Reports;(c) Avances sur garanties; (d) Comptes courants divers.
Credit Lyonnais: (a) Portefeuille et bons de la DefenseNationale; (b) Avances sur garanties et Reports; (c)Comptes courants.
United States.—Lome of 800 reporting member banksin leading cities, expressed in millions of dollars. Theseappear under the caption: Total loans and discounts, in-cluding bills rediscox.nted with the Federal reserve banks.
Commercial bank deposits.United Kingdom.—Deposits of the nine London clearing
banks, expressed in millions of pounds sterling.France.—The following items of the three commercial
banks, expressed in millions of francs:Comptoir National. d'Escompte: (a) Comptes de
cheques et comptes d'escompte (checking and other de-posit accounts); (6) Comptes courants crediteurs.
Socie'te' Gene*rale pour Favoriser le Developpement duCommerce et de l'lndustrie en France: (a) Comptes decheques; (b) Comptes courants divers.
Credit Lyonnais: (a) Depots et bons a vue (time anddemand deposits); (b) Comptes courants.
United States.—Net demand deposits of 800 reportingmember banks in leading cities, expressed in millions ofdollars.
Central bank discounts.United Kingdom.—Figures in the Bank of England
statement appearing under the heading of "Other securi-ties/' expressed in millions of pounds sterling. Theseare largely, but not exclusively, commercial bills.
France.—The following items from the statement of theBank of France, expressed in millions of francs: (a) Porte-feuille—Effets sur Paris; Effets sur 1' Etranger (foreignbills); (b) Portefeuille de succursales (branches).
Germany.—The following items from the statement ofthe Reichsbank, expressed in billions of marks: (a) Wech-sel und Schocks (bills); (6) Diskontierte Reichsschatzan-weisungen (discounted treasury bills).
United States. —Discounts of the Federal reserve banks,including those secured by United States Governmentobligations, expressed in millions of dollars.
Central bank note issues.United Kingdom.—The sum of Treasury notes and cer-
tificates outstanding and Bank of England notes in circu-lation, less bank notes held as part cover for currencynotes, expressed in millions of pounds sterling.
France.—-Billets au porteur (bearer notes) en circula-tion of the Bank of France, expressed in millions of francs.
Germany.—Notenumlauf (note circulation) of theReichsbank, expressed in billions of marks.
United States.—Federal reserve notes in circulation,expressed in millions of dollars.
Central bank discount rate.United Kingdom.—Discount rate of the Bank of England.France.—Discount rate of the Bank of France.Germany.—Discount rate of the Reichsbank.United States.—Discount rate on commercial paper of
the New York Federal Reserve Bank. v
II. PRICES AND EXCHANGE.
Wholesale price indexes.United Kingdom.—The index number computed by the
Federal Reserve Board, using an arithmetic averageweighted according to 1913 production and trade, withaverage prices in 1913 taken as 100.
France.—The index number computed by the FederalReserve Board according to the same method as for theUnited Kingdom.
Germany.—The index number computed by the Frank-furter Zeitung, using an arithmetic mean of relative pricesof 98 commodities weighted to some extent by the systemof multiple quotations. Prices of July, 1914, equal 100.
United States.—The index number computed by theFederal Reserve Board according to the same method asfor the United Kingdom.
Retail price indexes.United Kingdom.—The index number of cost of living
constructed by the Ministry of Labor, using the retailprices of food and clothing, rents, and the cost of fuel andlighting, weighted according to the importance of theitems in the budgets of working class families. Prices inJuly, 1914, are taken as 100.
France.—The index number computed by the GeneralStatistical Office, using the retail price of 13 commoditiesin Paris, weighted according to the average annual con-sumption of a workingman's family of four persons.Prices in July, 1914, are taken as 100.
Germany.—The index of cost of living computed by theFederal Statistical Bureau, using prices of food, fuel,light, and rent in 46 cities. The year 1913-14 is taken as100. •'
United States.—The index computed by the Bureau ofLabor Statistics, using the retail prices of 43 commoditiesin 5(J cities, weighted according to family consumption.The average for 1913 is taken as 100.
Foreign exchange.United Kingdom, France, Germany.—Monthly averages
of noon buying cable rates on London, Paris, and Berlin,in the New York market, expressed as percentages of par*
ni . PRODUCTION AND TRADE.Pig iron.
United Kingdom.—Total production during the monthas compiled by the National Federation of Iron and SteelManufacturers, reduced to a relative on the base of averagemonthly production in 1913.
France.—-Total production during the month as pub-lished in the League of Nations Monthly Bulletin ofStatistics, reduced to a relative on the base of averagemonthly production in 19]3.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 50: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
FBBRUAHY, 10L\'J. FEDERAL RKSKHVH BULLETIN. 185
United States.—Total production during the month asreported by the U. S. Geological Survey, reduced to arotative on the base of avemtre monthlv production in1013. "
Coal.United Kingdom.- -Average weekly production for the
month, as published by the Board of Trade, reduced toa relative on the base of average production in J91S.
France—Monthly production as published in theLeague of Nations Monthly Bulletin of Statistics, re-duced to a relative on the base of average production in1013. Since 1920 the figures include the output of Lor-raine and the Saar.
Germany.—-Monthly production as published in Gluck-auf, reduced to a relative on the base of average productionin 1913.
United States.—Monthly production as reported by theU. S. Geological Survey, reduced to a relative ou thebase of average production in 1913.
Unemployment.United Kingdom.—The percentage of unemployed in
insured trades, as published in trie Ministry of LaborGazette.
France.—The actual number of unemployed in the cityof Paris at the end of the month, as published in theBulletin du Ministere du Travail.
Germany'.-—The number of applicants for every hundredavailable positions, as published in the Reichsarbeits-blatt.
United States.—An index of employment in 12 repre-sentative trades, computed from statistics published inthe Monthly Labor Review, weighted according to therelative importance of the different trades in the censusof 1910, with 1919 average employment taken as 100.
Bank clearings.United Kingdom.—Total clearings for the month as
published by the London Bankers Clearing House, ex-pressed in millions of pounds sterling.
France.—Average daily clearings of,the Chambre ofCompensation of Paris, expressed in millions of francs.Since Dec. 1, 1917, 34 banks in Paris have reported.
Germany.—Total clearings during the month of theReichsbank, expressed in billions of marks.
United States.—Total debits to individual accounts dur-ing the month by banks in 140 reporting centers, not in-cluding New York City, as compiled by the FederalReserve Board, expressed in millions of dollars.
Shipping activity.^ These figures, expressed originally in net tons, havebeen reduced to relatives, with 1913 averages as bases.
United Kingdom—Total of ships cleared with carg
Statistics. . . . t , .forman?/.—Ship arrivals at Hamburg as published in
Wirtschaftdienst.United States.—Total of ships cleared with cargoes, a*
published in Monthly Summary of Foreign Commerce ofthe United States.Value of exports.
United Kingdom.—The value of total exports of f inest" 'merchandise as published in Accounts Relating to rradeand Navigation, expressed in thousands of pounds sterling.
F/amr.—Tho value of total exports a published in theDocuments Statistiques sur lo Commerce de la France,expressed in thousands of francs.
<;frma?iy.—Tho value of tola! export HE published inthe Monatlie-he Narhweiso iiber don Aumvurt.igcii HandelOeutschlamte, expressed in thousands of gold marks.
United States.—Tho. value of total exports JUS publishedin the Monthly Summary of the Foreign Commerce of theUnited States, expressed in thousands of dollar*.
Volume of exports.Untied Kingdom.—Volume of exports, evaluated at lOJ.'t
prices and reduced to relatives with the correspondingfigure for 11)13 taken as 100. These figures nre calculatedquarterly,by the Board of Trade.
France.— Tonnage of exports reduced to a relative, with1913 average tonnage taken as 100.
Gcnnuny.—Tonnage of exports reduced to a relative,with 1913 average tonnage taken as 100.
United States.—The. Federal Reserve Board foreigntrade index indicating relative quantities of principal ex-ports at 1913 prices, with 1913 monthly average valuetaken as 100.
Value of imports.These* are compiled from the same sources as the value
of exports.
Volume of imports.These are compiled from the same sources as volume of
exports.
UNITED KINGDOM.
ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS IN 1922.
General survey.—The year 1922 is note-worthy in that it marked a definite upturn inBritish business following the extreme de-pression of 1921. The principal lines of in-dustry have been more active, production hasincreased, and especially toward the end of theyear foreign trade has been expanding. Ster-ling exchange, moreover, increased dtiring De-cember to a point within 20 cents of gold parity.In spite of such indisputable signs of improve-ment, conditions in England are far fromnormal. Unemployment is still widespread,and many workers' are being retained on onlya part-time basis. As the present year opened,the internal situation in England appeared tobe fundamentally sound and slowly improving,but the uncertainty of European affairs, andabove all the disturbed state of Britain's Eu-ropean markets, make the prospect of furtherimmediate progress doubtful.
Industry and trade.—No serious labor dis-turbances such as those which gravely affectedindustry in 1921 occurred during the pastyear. The result was that the principal in-dustries were able to maintain a steady and
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 51: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
186 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY,
generally increasing output throughout theyear. Coal production toward the end of theyear had expanded -to almost the pre-warvolume, partly in response to the greaterdemand from domestic industries and partlyto the demand from the United States andGermany. Exports of coal were largely inexcess of those in either of the two yearspreceding, hut were not up to the pre-warlevel. Production of pig iron likewise showeda steady increase throughout the year, -but wasstill not much more than 50 per cent of theaverage monthly output in 1913. Semimanu-factured and finished steel products were alsoturned out in steadily larger quantities through-out 1922, but they were well below the averagemonthly output for either 1920 or 1913. Inthe textile trades the situation improved verydecidedly as compared with the previous year.
The foreign trade results of the year affordground for encouragement when compared withthe immediate past, although the situation isstill far from normal or satisfactory. Amongthe favorable aspects is the reduction in theadverse visible trade balance by more than£100,000,000 in 1922. In the latter part ofthe year exports of coal and of iron and steelwere particularly heavy, the 'foreign demandfor these products having the effect, as alreadyindicated, of stimulating production. In thecase of imports the somewhat larger receiptsof raw cotton and raw wool show up f avorably,as do the importations of raw hides. If, how-ever, comparison is made with the 1913 figures,it becomes evident at once that trade in .mostlines is far from its pre-war level, and that toomuch optimism may easily result from notingthe degree of progress since the extreme depres-sion of 1921.. The money marTeet.—The general tendency ofmoney rates was downward during the firsthalf of 1922, after which the market steadiedfor a time and then stiffened toward the endof the year. The Bank of England discountrate was 5 per cent at the beginning of 1922,was reduced to 44 per cent on February 16, to4 per cent on April 13, to 34 per cent on June15, and finally to 3 per cent on July 13, whereit has since remained. The rate paid by thejoint-stock banks on deposits was kept at 2per cent below the Bank of England rate, sothat during the latter part of the year deposi-tors were receiving only 1 per cent for the useof their funds. Both the banks and the dis-count houses as a result of this rather widedifferential have been enabled to do better
than might be expected in the face of lowinterest rates and the abnormal state of trade.Nevertheless, bank profits have been quite gen-erally reduced, as the recently issued yearlystatements of the banks disclose. As illustra-tions may be mentioned the London Joint Cityand Midland Bank, whose net profits in 1922were £2,253,492 as compared with £2,454,083in 1921, and Lloyds Bank, whose profits in1922 were £2,068,875, a reduction of some£460,000 below the preceding year.
Government finances.—The position of theGovernment will be clearer when the results ofthe entire fiscal year ending March 31 areavailable, but the details of revenue andexp*enditure for the first nine months arenevertheless instructive. Revenues have thusfar exceeded expenditures by nearly £13,000,-000, as compared with a deficit of over £63,-000,000 in the same period of. the previousfiscal year. This year both expenditures andreceipts have been lower, but whereas thelatter dropped £91,000,000, expenditures havebeen cut down by £167,000,000, giving rise tothe surplus already mentioned. An analysis ofthe individual items under the head of receiptsshows that the principal reduction has been inspecial miscellaneous receipts, which comprisesales of surplus war stocks and the like. Netreturns from the excess-profits duty havealmost disappeared, being less than £1,000,000in the nine months as against estimated netreceipts of about £28,000,000 from that sourcefor the entire fiscal year. The income tax, onthe other hand, has yielded more than wasexpected, showing an increase of £13,000,000over the same period of the previous year,although a reduction of some £70,000,000 forthe full year was anticipated when the Gov-ernment made up its pudget. I t may benoted here that the new income tax rate of 5s.instead of 6s. in the pound did not becomeeffective as regards payments until after Dec-ember 31.
Under the head of Government expenditure,reductions are to be noted in all of the principalitems. The largest savings in the first ninemonths of the current fiscal year, comparedwith the same period a year earlier, were£96,000,000 in the civil services, £45,000,000in the army, navy, and air services, £14,000,000in the revenue and post-office departments,and £11,000,000 in war-debt interest, etc.Unless supplementary expenditures of largeamount are necessary in the remaining threemonths of the fiscal year, the Government
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 52: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
FKBRIARY, 102fi. FKDKKAL HKSKUVK lU'LLKTIX. 187
accounts should balance with something kspare.
An important feature of Government Jinan-cial operations during the year has been thecontinued reduction in the "floating debt. OnDecember 31, 1922, the total floating debtamounted to £941,000,000, of which £719,000,-000 was in the form of short-term treasury billsand the remainder in temporary advances onthe credit of ways and means. As comparedwith the figures for the end of the previousyear, this represents a decline of £341,000,000in treasury bills, which, coupled with an in-crease in temporary advances, brings about anet reduction of £319,000,000 in the totalfloating debt. Most of this reduction occurredin the first quarter of 1922, the decrease in thefloating debt since the beginning of the newfiscal year in April being £88,000,000. In thefirst nine months of ttie fiscal year, neverthe-less, there has been a net reduction of some£163,000,000 in treasury bills outstanding.Retirement of war bonds and other obligationsduring this period brings the total net retire-ment to about £260,000,000. The surplus ofrevenues over expenditures, as indicated above,has been £13,000,000, so that, allowing for areduction of £8,000,000 in exchequer balances,it has been necessary to create new debt to theamount of £239,000,000. Treasury bonds ofvarying maturities totaling nearly £133,000,000have been issued to supply the larger part ofthe required sum, while the remainder has beenprovided for through national savings certifi-cates (£30,000,000 net) and through additionaltemporary advances (nearly £75,000,000). Asa result of the Government's conversion andfunding operations during the year, the nomi-nal amount of the national debt has beenslightly increased at the same time that theburden of interest charges has been consider-ably reduced.
FRANCE.
REVIEW OF THE YEAR 1922.
The year 1922 was marked by notableimprovement in practically all branches ofFrench industrial and commercial activity.Production was high in most lines; crops,with the exception of wheat, were good; rail-way traffic increased and foreign trade, meas-ured by volume, was materially in excess ofpre-war figures; labor was continuously em-ployed, and the savings of the people sup-plied capital for increasing the meai^ of pro-
duction, especially through the restoration oftho devastated regions.
Financially, tho year was loss bright. Nowcapital could bo obtained only at high rates.Bank figures show little reflection of thoincreased activity. Exchange rates closedthe year at low levels. Tho Government,still unable to balance even its ordinary budget',was obliged U* continue borrowing on mostburdensome torms. Yet even tho rathergloomy financial record of the year is notwithout encouraging signs. For the first yearsince 1913 the floating debt of the Govern-ment was not increased. The average volumeof the note circulation was lower than inthe preceding years, and the Governmentsucceeded in reducing its expenditures whileat the same time its income was considerablyincreased,
IXDUSTUV AXD THADK.
Production.—Industrial activity, which inJanuary, 1922, had rebounded somewhat fromthe depression of 1921, continued to increasethroughout the year. The figures for ironand steel are particularly important, as theygive some evidence of the fundamental changein French economics brought about by therecovery of Lorraine. For December, 1921,pig-iron production was 301,000 metric tons;in November, 1922, it had reached 513,000metric tons. Tho significance of these figuresis emphasized by the statement that Frenchproduction of pig iron exceeded that of GreatBritain in every month but two of the year.Production of crude steel increased throughoutthe vear, though not on the same scale.
The metallurgical industry of France, itshould be remembered, is dependent uponimported coal and coke. France is nowproducing within its own borders about three-fourths as much coal as before the war, andproduction is showing a steady but slowincrease. It is, however, far from sufficientfor current needs, and practically none of itis capable of reduction to coke. The principaloutside sources are the Saar, Germany (theRuhr), England, and Belgium. Productionin the S'aar was much higher than in 1920 or1921, and is virtually at the 1913 level; con-sequently, not much further increase is to beanticipated. Germany, in the first 10 monthsof 1922, exported to 'France 7,031,369 metrictons, which is about 90 per cent of the 1921leliveries (7,755,895 metric tons). As German
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 53: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
188 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
deliveries declined while the needs of Frenchindustry were expanding, imports fromEngland were enormously increased, risingfrom 4,028,976 metric tons for the first 10months of 1921 to 9,780,081 metric tons forthe same period in 1922. The influence ofthese increased coal purchases in Englandwas a major factor in the decline of Frenchexchange in the latter half of the year.
Despite the radical economic changes in-troduced by the war, agriculture is still theleading industry of France. Crops in generalwere good, the wheat crop being poor and thepotato and sugar-beet crops excellent. Wineproduction was exceptionally large. This situ-ation necessitated heavy imports of wheat,but these can not be offset by exports of wine.In 1913 Germany and England were heavyimporters of French wines, but exports to boththese countries were much reduced in 1922.
Internal trade.—The year witnessed alsoincreasing activity in internal trade. This isshown clearly in railroad traffic and earningsand in the figures for the sales tax.
The following table shows the receipts ofthe principal French railway companies for1922.
FRENCH RAILWAY RECEIPTS FOR 1922.
(In thousands of francs.]
Railway. Receiptsfor 1922.
Nord •. 1,100,100Est : J 1,003,038P . L . M | 1,800,950Paris-Orleans 1 917,817Midi j 462 460State Railway ! 1,004,777
Increaseover 1921.
109,531102,924114,85510,52317,24353,601
Per-centageof in-
crease.
11.011.46.381.2
3.875.64
The net deficits, which must be made up bythe State under the guarantee law, are givenin the following table:
(In millions of francs.]
Railroad.
NordEstParjs-Lyon-Me'diterran&s.Paris-OrleansMidiState Railway
1920
57S303644494275718
Total. 3,012
1921
233160426
'385184
2,084
1922
17080230250150430
1,310
This betterment is supported by the figuresfor car loadings, which nave shown an irregu-
lar increase throughout the year, with thistendency becoming more pronounced in thefall months.
DAILY AVERAGE FREIGHT CAR LOADINGS.
1022—July 50,031August 51j 095September.. 53,155
] 922—October 57,185November- . . 56,046December. . . 55,848
The more recent figures are still below the1913 average of 60,000, though the presenttotals include Alsace and Lorraine, whichaccount for more than 10 per cent of theloadings. The recovery of the railroads fromthe impoverished position in which they wereleft by the war and the remarkable improve-ment in their situation in the last two yearsare most encouraging signs. I t is to be notedthat none of the lines is yet free from theneed of State aid under the guaranty lawdescribed in detail in the FEDERAL RESERVE
BULLETIN of November, 1922; but the draftupon the treasury has been reduced by over50 per cent from 1920.
The returns from the turnover tax alsoshow evidences of increasing business activity.
RECEIPTS FROM THE T U R N O V E R T A X .
[In millions of francs.]
January..February,March....AprilMayJune
1921
183152148157146147
1922
192165169183ISO189
JulyAugust....September,October...November,December.
1921 1922
146147157168172173
19718818720S210213
These figures indicate progress during recentmonths, though their reliability as a business in-dex is yet to be tested, as the tax has not beenin operation a sufficient time. The recentfigures, however, are still far from equalingthe monthly average of the third quarter of1920 (the first three months of its operation),namely, 309,381,000 francs.
Foreign trade.—The complete figures for1922 are given on page 216. At the date ofwriting, detailed statistics for the first 11months only are available. These figuresshow an apparently favorable balance of tradewith England, Germany, Belgium, Switzer-land, and Spain, and unfavorable balanceswith the other countries reported. The fol-lowing table shows the trade relations with theprincipal,commercial countries:
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 54: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Y, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 189
FOREIGN TRADE OF FRANCE (COMMERCE SPECIAL) INFIRST 11 MONTHS OP 1922.
[In millions of francs.]
Country.1 Imports.I to! France.
Exports.from
France
Kngland \ 2,0SlGermany | 1170BelgiumSwitzerlandItalyUnited StatesBrazilArgentina
, !1,170 t1,499 i
7223,356 ,
397 i"Ob
3,2361,5923,297
S74628
1,807m256
In the first 11 months trade with Englandnearly balanced. Belgium was the best cus-tomer of France, while the latter purchasedmore in the United States than in any otherone country.
In value, the principal imports of Francefrom the United States have been as follows:
[In millions of francs.]
Merchandise.
CerealsSugarTobaccoCottonMineral oil
First 11months—
1921 1922
5107465
918653
1731721289S7521
Merchandise.
Heavy oi l . . . .Iron and steelCopperMachinery...Coal
First 11months—
1921 1922
16870
158254189
161145214T-64
2
Perhaps the most interesting of these itemsis that of cereals. Although her own cropwas poor, France reduced xier purchases ofcereals from 50,860 metric tons to 33,304metric tons in 1922. France has been pur-chasing less wheat in the United States andmore from the Argentine; but imports of oatsand corn from the United States show notableincreases. .
Labor situation.—The revival of industry liaseliminated what little unemployment therewas in France in 1921. Although at no timesince the war could unemployment in Francebe considered a vital problem, the course ofunemployment is summarized here to drawattention to data of this kind as a very valuableindex of the economic condition of the country.The peak of unemployment was reached mMarch, 1921, when unemployment reliel wasextended to 45,504 persons (March 11). lnesame month the number of situations foundfor the unemployed reached its lowest l<romthat time the recovery was very rapid; and itis perhaps significant that the turn m employ-
ment figures was the iirst indication of re-oovery from the business depression of 1020-21.During 1922 unemployment was at nil timesnegligible, but the decline in I lie number ofpersons aided in Paris from 4,(io8 (January 21),the high point of the yo\\v. to the low figureof 272 (October, 1922) indicates iho (rend.While these numbers do not include nil personsout of work, they furnish a valuable index ofunemployment. During the year there were*only two strikes of consequence, a metalworkers' strike at Havre and the, shippingstrike. The former has had no lasting result;but the latter, which arose from nn attempt tomodify the 8-hour law, has brought con-siderable losses to French shipping.
There is at present a shortage of labor inFrance. The demand for workers at highwages for restoring the devastated regions hasdepleted the supply of labor, particularly inthe coal mines. To an extent this short«go isbeing met by immigration, notably from Italyand Poland.
FINANCE.
Money rates.—While business was showingremarkable improvement in 1922, financialrecovery was still opposed by numerousobstacles. ' With the Government still a con-stant borrower in competition with the urgentneeds of industry, money rate$ remained high.Early in the year an attempt was made toreduce these rates. On March 11 the Bank ofFrance reduced its discount rate from 5J to 5per cent, and the same day the reductionin the rate on bons de la Defense Nation ale wasput into effect. • The following table shows theaverage rate on the issues of new securitiestabulated by the Association Nation ale desPorteurs Fran<;ais do Valours Mobili&res.
INTEUEKT RATH ON XEW SECURITY J.SSI'ES.
Jan 0.60 MayFeb ....0.61. .TuneMar •...6.57 JulyApr G.45 Ang
6.37 | Sept 6.;M. . . .0 .30 ! Oct <>.'M. . . .6 .02 J\ov 6.59. . . .6 .32
This table is valuable because it shows thetrend, but it does not accurately depict thecost of capital. Some of the issues are taxfree; in others the tax is assumed by the issu-ing corporation, so that for October the costof money for an industrial enterprise of highstanding would have been nearly 8 per cent.In October several departments were author-ized to contract loans; the maximum ratesauthorized ranged from 7.95 per cent to 8.10
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 55: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
190 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY. lirJ.'t
per cent, though none was for a sum of over750,000 francs and most of them were for muchsmaller amounts. It will be recalled that onthe 3-5 year treasury loan of October the Gov-ernment had to pay over 6i per cent. InDecember the Credit Foncier reduced chargeson mortgage loans to municipalities from 7.60to 7.45 per cent and to private persons fromS.25 to 7.60 per cent.
Security markets.—In spite of the price ofmoney, a great number of new issues wasbrought out.
SECURITY ISSUES FOR 1022.
[In millions of francs.]
Month.
January . . .February..March. . . . .AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember.October....November.
Indus-trial.!
7915,054
456340769
3,9S912592
601421179
Railroad.
241285392222186333271
1,80434
Treasurybills.
1,3673 305
747689
1,362920
al,2S4412
1,011702
*8,190
1 Includes Credit National issues in February and June.* Also 33,000,000 francs obligations de la Defense Nationale issued in
January and February.* Cancellations exceeded new sales.* 3-5 year Treasury bonds. Figure of Treasury bills unavailable.
The course of securities listed on the ParisBourse shows two distinct movements. Dur-ing the early part of the year, when business wasstill dull, securities bearing a fixed rate of re-turn advanced; during the latter part of theyear popular interest turned to securities ofvariable return, including foreign bonds whoseinterest is payable in currencies higher or morestable in value than the franc.
INDEX NUMBERS OF SECURITY PRICES (STATISTIQUEGENERALE.)
[End of month figures, 1901-1910=100.]
Average:1913191919201921
1922—January...February..MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
Securitieswith fixed
return.
Securitieswith vari-
able return.
91.375.867.96,5.9 !66.868.169.269.2fi9.6W.771.372.572.3
127157192145142138137135HO141146159158
It will be noted that for the securities bear-ing a fixed rate of return, the course is parallelto that of the American bond market, the peakof this movement in both countries beingreached at nearly the same time. In the caseof securities not bearing a fixed rate of return,the average rate declined during the first fourmonths and then began to rise sharply. Theaverages for the last three months of the yearare not available, but they will probably showa continuation of the rise into November, whenthe list reacted slightly, but closed the year athigh levels. The course of the Bourse this yearhas run approximately opposite to the course ofthe foreign exchange rate of the franc; and thefluctuation of the exchange has often been em-ployed to explain the movement, especially inthe autumn rise in stocks which, because of itssimilarity to the phenomenon of the BerlinBorse, some persons described as a "flight fromthe franc." There can be no doubt that sucha factor might have a strong influence, particu-larly in the case of a security whose interest ordividend was payable in a foreign currency.In the case of French stocks, however, the influ-ence of improving business and rising com-modity prices was also a material factor in therise. The recovery has been well distributed,though concerns whose products could be usedfor reconstruction purposes have done particu-lar^ well. Stocks of gas companies and ship-yards have shown little improvement. A com-parison of security prices with such other in-dexes as commodity priens or foreign exchangerates shows how little the security marketshave reflected the depreciation of the franc.
Banking.—The marked revival in trade andindustrial activitj^ finds comparatively littlereflection in bank figures. For the purpose ofthis discussion typical items of the SocieteGenerale pour Favoriser le Developpement duCommerce ct de Tlndustrie, the Credit Lyomnais, and the Comptoir National are givenbelow:
A S S E T S .
[In millions of francs.]
Bills, in-cludingtreasury
bills.
Dec. 31,1921 9,866Mar. 31,1922 9,594June30,1922 i 10,671Sept. 30,1922 ; . 10,532Dec. 31,1922 j
Openaccounts.
2,3542 2702,2962,069
Bank of France.1
Port-folio.
2,5052,9142,3322,1042,401
Ad-vances
to privatepersons.
2,2412,3112 1882,0862,069
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 56: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
FEBRUARY. FEDERAL RESERVK RTLLETIX. 191
LIABILITIES.
(In millions of francs.)
Date.
Threecommercial
banks—Demand
I depositsland current
accounts.
Bank ofFrance -Currentaccountsand de-posits.
Dec.31,1921 ' 12,873 iMar.31,1922 '• 12,374 |June 30, 1922 ' 13,582 \Sept. 30,1922,... 13,147 jDec. 31,1922 ! I
2.7182,2102,3912, ISO2,289
» For the Bank of France the figures are those of the last weekly state-ment of the month.
The changes, though nut so large as mighthave been expected, are distinctly encourag-ing. They are more noticeable in the case ofthe commercial banks than in the Bank ofFrance. Several explanations are offered toaccount for the relatively small changes. Thefirst is that the three banks chosen, in spite oftheir great size, are not so widely representedin the northeast, where the metallurgicalindustry, which has had a remarkable recovery,is largely located. The second theory is thatthere is a lag of several months between anindustrial revival and its reflection in bankfigures, owing to the gradual reduction offrozen credits. Still another possibility lies inthe relative proportion of commercial bills totreasury bills in the item of " Bills, includingtreasury bills.'1 I t is impossible to say defi-nitely, as this item is not given in detail,but it is at least possible that the banks havebeen getting rid of the treasury jpaper, with itsrelatively low rate, and increasing their hold-ings of commercial paper. Another reason—and perhaps one of the most important rea-sons—for the phenomenon lies in the fact thatmuch of the revival of business is due to thedirect activity of the Government in recon-struction. Such governmental transactions donot require banking service to the same degreeas the enterprises of individuals. ^
Savings deposits.—Deposits of the ' ordinarysavings banks showed a net increase in everymonth of 1922, the average being 52,910,000francs. This figure compares with 66,688,000francs in 1921 and 48,471,000 francs in 1920.The highest month was February and thelowest October. The reason for the declinein this month was probably the competitionwith the 3 to 5 year treasury bonds. The netincrease for the year was 634,917,000 francs(provisional figure). These figures are for tne
Caisses d'Eptirgne ordinaircs. and do not repre-sent the total savings deposits of tho yrnr.These figures are not yet available.
Foreign exchange. -The course of (wehnnyerates on France was exceedingly irrogulnr in1022, but for the second conserutive year thefranc, as measured by the dollar, registered im-provement. The average for the 12 monthswas 8.20 cents per franc, as contrasted with7.45 cents in 1921 and 7.0J cents in 1920, again of 1.16 cents in two years. During theyear there were a great number of fluctuationswhich it is at least plausible to ascribe to specu-lation. But, besides these minor fluctuations,it is possible to trace two major movements ortrends, which appear distinctly in tho followingtable of monthly averages:
FRENCH EXCHANGE ON NEW YOUK IN 1022.
January $0.0810February 0S73March 0000April 0922May 0011June 0S7G
July *0.0K2;iAugust O7i»5September 07(10October 07:j7November OOKGDecember 0723
This shows an uninterrupted rise in thofranc from the beginning of the year, a risewhich started in November, 1921, and culmi-nated in April, 1922. From that peak of 9.35cents on April 24, it declined steadily to a lowof 6.20 cents on November 8, rallying in Decem-ber. The length of these swings up and downrenders necessary a search for fundamentalcauses.
In considering the nuisos for these majormovements it is worth while to consider thoinfluence of the visible balance of trade and offoreign loans. The following table shows thocourse of trade for 1922:
VISIBLE Tit APE BALANCE OF FRANCE FOR HI22.
[Thousands of francs.]
Period.Tn favor-
Imports, i Kxports. ablebalance.
First 6 months ; 10,671,M2July ! 1,99.%74GAugust i 1,959,729September ! M93,121October HSSi?NovemberDecember
2,348,2,923,000
9.3f>s fifiO1,433,0*21,676,3141,741,0621,937,4671,706,499 I3,079,000 ;
1,302,1)32
2 3 , 4 1lf>2,039171,40.16-11,746
Uftf.OOO
Total for year 23.900.305 20,942,014 I 2,95S,261
i Favorable balance.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 57: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
192 FEDERAL KESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 192,'J.
For the first fire months of the year, whenthe exports were valued on a higHer scale ofprices, the total indicated balance was slightlym favor of France. The readjustment of thescale in June changed this to an unfavorablebalance for the first six months, but so far ascan be determined from such statistics itappears that French foreign trade for the firstfive months of 1922 was very nearly in equilib-rium. During the same period France floatedseveral good-sized foreign loans, particularlyin England and the United States, as may beseen from the following summary:
FRENCH EXTERNAL LOANS IN 1922.
Month.
January...
FebruaryMarch
Do
DoDoDoDoDo
AprilJuly
Amount.
JS25,000,000
[£3,000,000£5,000,000$ 6,000,000510,000,000
$30,000,000£2,000,000£3,000,0001*1,075,000£5.000,000$10,000,000250,000,000
Issued by—
Department of theSeine.
doP . L . M . R . RSoissonsFramerican Industrial
Development Corpo-ration.
P. L. M. R. R....Paris-Orleans R. R.. . .MidiR.R
doNordR.RP. L .M.R.RParis-Orleans R. R.. . .
Where placed.
United States.
England.Do.
United States.Do.
Do.England.
Bo.United States.England.United States.Switzerland.
1 The issue was in francs; 25,000,000 francs, sold at. $79 per 1,000 francs.2 Swiss francs.
The following table showing the movementof gold from France to the United Statesshould also be noted in this connection:EXPORTS OF GOLD FROM FRANCE TO THE UNITED STATES.
Month.
TanuaryFebruary..MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember.OctoberNovember.December..
Total
1921
$4,695,4S113,683,37426,956,33310,895,1709,725,9297,482,146
27,973,32734,999,29417,784,30218,596,50715,051,3313,730,062
191,473,266
1922
fl , 874,7991,425,8816,649,9711,161,039
543,754667,019
1,688,202889,784
2,070,3892,635,2541,910,8445,526,222
27,043,158
Since July no French loan has been floatedabroad. The influence of these loans on theexchange rate, at a time when the risible tradebalance was approximately in equilibrium, isso obvious as to require no comment. It wasequally obvious that after the proceeds of theseloans were spent, and the exchange marketdeprived of their temporary support, the franchad to decline. The French wheat crop was
known to be poor, while under the influence ofthe trade revival the demand for raw materials,especially cotton and coal, was certain to beheavy. Against this inevitable increase inimports, France had no increased item ofexports to offer. Finally in November, whenimports increased and exports diminished, theunfavorable balance for the single month washalf of the entire first six months of the year.In that nionth only about three-fourths of theimports were covered by exports. The Frenchpress is particularly insistent on the part playedby speculation iii the sensational decline inNovember; and in all probability, encouragednot only by the known economic facts, but alsoby alarmist statements of French Governmentfinances, and the unpromising reparation situ-ation, speculative selling was a factor. Doubt-less, also, speculative purchasing or shortcovering was a factor in the abrupt rise inearly December. But the fact remains thatthe actual status of the visible balance ofFrench trade will go far toward explaining thevulnerable condition of French exchange inNovember, and, in fact, since. The suddenincrease in French exports in December maybe explained in part, at least, by low exchangein the preceding month.
Government finance.—The finances of theGovernment have been discussed at length inthe December, 1922, and January, 1923,BULLETINS. The most encouraging fact tonote is the increased yield of taxation, esti-.mated at 23,623,000,000 francs, about 960,000,000 francs greater than in the preceding year.As to the total estimated expenditures of theyear, they were discussed in the DecemberBULLETIN and no further information hasbecome available. They arc stated to havebeen almost 8,000,000,000 francs less than inthe preceding year. The budget for 1923 hadnot been passed at the end of the year, but theproject indicates a material deficit. The minis-try made several attempts to introduce taxlegislation, looking toward stricter methods ofassessment or increasing rates. These pro-posals met with effective resistance; on theother hand, the lower limits of tax exemptionwere actually raised during the year. Whilethe loss in revenue on this account is not likelyto be large, the incident is significant.
The public debt.—As the public debt hasrecently been discussed in the BULLETIN., onlytwo facts may be mentioned here. The Minis-ter of Finance announced at the end of theyear that there had been no increase inthe floating debt, and that the October loan
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 58: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 193
brought in only 2,400,000,000 francs of freshmoney. This is interpreted as meaning thatapproximately 5,600,000,000 francs of theOctober issue, which carried a rate consider-ably over 6 per cent, was exchanged fortreasury bills or bons de la Defense Nationaleon which the highest rate is 4^ per cent.Further, by convention with the Bank ofFrance, dated December 21, 1922, the conven-tion of December 29, 1920, was modified,reducing the repayment of advances to thebank from 2,000,000,000 francs to 1,000,000,000francs. The repayment was largely met outof the amortization fund of the Bank ofFrance, which on December 28, 1922, stoodat 796,310,223 francs, and on January 4, 1923,at only 2,937,929 francs. Although the con-vention of December 21, 1922, specified thatthe reduction to 1,000,000,000 francs of theannual amortization of the debt to the bankis exceptional and is not to be regarded as aprecedent, the discussion about it has shownthat there is a considerable opinion opposedto the extinguishment of this debt, preferringto accept as permanent the devaluation of thefranc rather than to subject the country to theproblems arising from an attempt to elevatethe value of the franc by such measures, atleast for the present.
From the point of view of internal Govern-ment finance, it would appear that the twomost pressing problems are (a) to balance theregular budget and (b) to relieve the situationof the floating debt, particularly the bons de laDefense Nationale. The former, of course,may be accomplished either by reducingexpenditures or increasing income, which willpresent new problems in the future as returnsfrom war taxes and the sales of war stocksdimmish. The question of the floating debt ismore difficult. The October loan did notindicate that the condition of the money mar-ket was very propitious for a funding loan.The increase in business activity has renderedthe bons, with their present low rate, rela-tively less attractive as short-time invest-ments. Proposals have been offered to reducethe rates still further; one effect ol sucft areduction might be to improve the marketfor rentes, wlile other results may be con-
ThTtotal budget includes also the so-calledrecoverable items of pensions and reconstruc-tion. At present there is no prospect 01meeting these items out of. current income
Reconstruction represents a capital invest-ment and as such it is manifestly sound financeto fund the costs, whether or not they arejveritually met out of reparations.
Note circulation,—The note circulation wasiubject to only slight fluctuations during theyear. The average circulation was 36,330,19S,-300 francs, compared with 37,404,000,000 francsfor 1921, and 38,065,628,000 francs for 1920.The low figures of 35,281,790,000 francs wastouched March 23 and the high of 37,514,493,000francs on October 5. A part of this reduction incirculation is due to the reduction of the State'sdebt to the Bank of France, by 2,000,000,000francs in 1921; and the fact that the circulationdid not decline by an approximately similaramount may be ascribed to the increase in in-dustrial activity during 1922. French businessmethods require a very large per capita circula-tion, as compared with the United States. OnDecember 28, 1922, the per capita circulationof Bank of France notes was about 947 francs,while on a comparable date (January 1, 1923)the circulation for the United States was only§42.81 per capita, which at the average rate forDecember was about 600 francs, though goldprices for France are materially lower than inthe United States. This difference is com-monly ascribed to the greater use of checks inthe United States and to a higher velocitv ofcirculation. The purpose of mentioning it hereis to call attention to the fact that an increaseof note circulation from the levels of last yearwould not necessarily imply inflation of thecurrency, nor would a decline in the circulationof itself indicate a sounder financial condition,unless carefully checked against the generalcommercial and industrial condition of thecountry.
Summary.—The year 1922 brought a pro-nounced industrial and economic improvementto France. Industrially the greatest obstacleto further improvement lies in the problem ofsecurino- a sufficient quantity of coal, and moreparticularly coke, to exploit the natural re-sources of the country. Agriculturally theshortage of the 1922 wheat crop was ratherserious, but indications for the current year aremore promising. Financially the record olthe year is less bright, for it brought a consid-erable increase in the already heavy publicdebt; but to offset this it must be rememberedthat the revival of industry which marked 1922has rendered France more capable of bearingthe burden of that debt.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 59: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
194 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
GERMANY.
THE ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF THE RUHR.
The occupation of the Ruhr district byFrench and Belgian troops brings the coaland iron situation of Continental Europeagain into the center of European politicaland economic discussion. With the ces-sion of Alsace-Lorraine to France underthe treaty of Versailles, the political divi-sion between the iron and coal districts ofEurope became much more pronounced thanit was before the war. France, as a result,now possesses about 48 per cent of the totaliron-ore deposits of Europe, thus being in aposition to become an iron and steel produc-ing country of the first importance.
Nevertheless, in spite of her full control ofthe Saar Basin, the development of the Pont-a-Mousson coal fields, and the increase in pro-duction of the Pas de Calais mines, France isunable to produce enough coal, and especiallycok6, for the proper exploitation of her irondeposits and the full development of her metal-lurgical industry. Even in the present stateof that industry, which is operating at abouthalf of its capacity, France is forced to importlarge quantities of coal and coke from othercountries, especially from the Ruhr district.Germany, on the other hand, as long as sheretains control over this district, is in posses-sion of the most important coal fields, withthe largest reserve of coking coal on the Euro-pean Continent, but at the same time is with-out the necessary iron ore at home for fullyutilizing her coal and coke. Even before thewar, with Germany in control of Lorraine,large quantities of coal and coke were shippedfrom the Ruhr to France, which in turn ex-ported considerable quantities of iron ore intothis industrial district. This exchange of coalfor iron between Germany and France wasimmediately resumed after the armistice.
The treaty of Versailles drew a politicalboundary between these two important rawmaterials,1 neither of which can well be ex-ploited without the other. To state it moreexplicitly, the French metallurgical industrycan hardly be developed to its full capacit^ywithout the coke of the Ruhr, while the Ger-man metallurgical industry, chiefly located inthe Ruhr, can attain only about half of itspre-war output if it is deprived of the Frenchiron ore. The rich coal fields of the Ruhr are
1 See small inset map on p. 195 showing location of the Ruhr coaldistrict of Germany and the principal iron district of France in Lorraine.
thus of great economic importance to bothFrance and Germany. But while the Ruhrdistrict is of vital significance to France onlyfor the future development of her metallurgicalindustry, it is one of Germany's greatest eco-nomic resources and the basis of a large partof her industries. For upon the coal of theRuhr rest not only the German coal and ironindustries (the so-callecl {i heavy" industry—Schwerindustrie), but also the electrical, dye-stuff, and, to a considerable extent, the textileindustry. In the Ruhr Valley there arelocated the largest German iron and steelplants and the head offices of the large Germancombines; from this part of Germany comes alarge percentage of Germany's exported goods,especially iron and steel products; and finallyfrom here the German railways and publicutilities derive much of their fuel.
The importance of the coal fields of theRuhr is not limited to the two mentionedcountries. Ruhr coal plays an importantpart also in the Belgian, Dutch, Italian, andother central European industries.
RELATION OF THE RUHR DISTRICT TO GERMANY.
The Ruhr district is the most important in-dustrial region in Germany. I t coiitains therichest coal fields of the country, and there arealso located the most important German keyindustries. The cession of a large portion ofUpper Silesia to Poland crippled Germany's in-dustries located in that section of the countryand enhanced the relative importance "of theRuhr. Furthermore, after the conclusion ofpeace a great readjustment and expansion tookplace in the Ruhr district, which further in-creased its economic importance to the rest ofGermany. The big German industrialists,after the loss of their Lorraine iron and steelplants, concentrated their efforts mainly in theRuhr district and established there a numberof new factories in order to replace those locatedin Lorraine. This district thus became ofgreater importance to Germany after the warthan it was before the armistice.
The Ruhr district is not an administrativeunit. It forms a part of the Rhineland Prov-ince and Westphalia. I t comprises a territoryof about 7,920 square kilometers and is inhab-ited by about 6,000,000 persons, of whom about1,500,000 are employed in mining. In thiscomparatively small area are located some ofthe most important industrial cities, such asEssen, Dortmund, Bochum, and Gelsenkirchen.(See accompanying map.)
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 60: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 19E3. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 195
- '—iGeisenkircherw-1 — V*!• • •• • • •* •
• . • ' • • * • • • ••• •• • \ . . - M . Bochunj ••
• \m\ *
MAP OF THE RUHR DISTRICT IN GERMANY, t
Although the lamest industrial plants, espe-cially those engaged in the production of steeland iron, are located in the Ruhr Valley, itseconomic importance is due to the prevalenceof coal. The Ruhr coal region embraces anarea of 2,000 square kilometers, and, accordingto German experts, has a visible reserve oi54,300,000,000 tons, distributed as follows: 11billion tons down to a depth of 700 meters; 18.3billion tons between 700 and 1,000 meters; and25 billion between 1,000 and 1,500 meters.Besides black coal, the Ruhr has also an in-visible reserve of 4 billion tons of lignite orbrown coal.
The dominating position of the Ruhr as acoal-producing district becomes more apparentfrom the following table, which compares thetotal output of coal and the number of em-ployees engaged in mining in Germany withthe output and number of miners in the Ruhr.
/ l The small inset map shows the location of the Ruhr coal district(black area); the iron district of Lorraine (hatched area); and the Saaiiron district (cross-hatched area).
BITUMINOUS GOAL PRODUCTION IN GERMANY IN 1920.
RuhrTotal GermanyPer cent Ruhr.
Numberof minesin opera-
tion.
263407
64.6
Numberof
miners.
452,620713,199
63.5
Totalamount ofwages and
salaries(000 marks).
7,509,4SS10,825,856
69.5
Output of coal.
Quantity(tons).
88,380,212131,355,904
69.4
Value(000
marks).
13,437,44120,100,311
66.7
The relation of the pre-war and post-war coaloutput of the Ruhr to that of Germany as awhole is as follows:
OUTPUT OF COAL, IN TONS.
GermanyRuhrPercent Ruhr
1913
190,109,000114,550,153
60.3
1920
131,347,00088,380,000
67.3
1921 1922 »
1136,210,000 j 120,664,00094,114,785 97,350,000
69.1 80.7
»Estimated.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 61: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
196 HESEKVE ITEBRUARY, 1928.
As already mentioned, the chief quality ofthe Ruhr coal is that it can easily and cheaplybe converted into first-class coke. In fact, thepercentage of coke produced in the Ruhr dis-trict of the total coke production in Germanyis much larger than that of coal, as may beseen from the following figures:
COKE PRODUCTION IN GERMANY, IN T O N S .
Ruhr ; .Total GermanyPer cent Ruhr of total
19221 1921
22/300,000 24,203,00029,409,000 i 27,921,000
76.8 ! 86.7^ I
1920
21,546,00025,177,000
85.6
1913
29,379,00034,630,000
84.8
1 Estimated.
The by-products of coal and coke are of noless importance to many German industriesthan these raw materials themselves, and theabundance of coal has made the Ruhr the cen-ter of Germany's coal and coke by-product in-dustries upon which the dye and other chemicalindustries depend. The value of the total out-put of coal and coke by-products in the Ruhras compared with that of Germany may beseen from the following table:
PRODUCTION OF BY-PRODUCTS OF BITUMINOUS COAL.
1913.
Ruhr districtTotal GermanyPer cent of Ruhr district
1918.
Ruhr districtTotal GermanyPer cent of Ruhr district
1919.
Ruhr districtTotal GermanyPer cent of Ruhr district
Tar andtar prod-
ucts.
934,5461,152,772
81.1
893,2541,102,659
81.0
581,016734,484
fcl
Benzol.
155,086194,425
79.8
198,410247,160
bO.'S
113,910146,440
77.8
Ammo-nia.
390,530456,411
85.6
421,266492,142
85.6
natinggas (000cubic
meters).
145,863161,805
90.1
280,307320,210
87.5
230,358 [ 246,373274,167 287,224
84.0 85.8
The abundance of rich coking coal, coupledwith its geographical proximity to the Lor-raine iron ore and its closeness to tidewater,has made the Ruhr district not only the great-est coal and coke producing center in Conti-nental Europe, but also the heart of the Ger-man steel and iron industry. Of the 288 Ger-man blast furnaces operated in 1913 (excludingLuxemburg), 103 were located in the Ruhr dis-trict. This region also produced, in 1913,8,220,000 tons of pig iron, out of a total Germanoutput of 17,760,000 tons, or 46.3 per cent. Of
Germany's 159 steel plants in 1913, 91, or 57.2per cent, were in the Ruhr Valley, and of the17,617,000 tons of steel produced in 1913,10,112,000 tons, or 57.4 per cent, came fromthat region.
Since a large percentage of German mines,steel and chemical plants, and other industriesare located in the Ruhr district, one can easilycomprehend its importance in Germany's for-eign trade. Although no definite figures areavailable as to the quantity of exported goodsoriginating in the Ruhr, the following datathrow some light on the situation. Of thetotal value of German exports in 1913, amount-ing to about 10 billion gold marks, about 700million gold marks represent the value of ex-ported coal, coke, and briquettes, and about3 billion gold marks the value of the exports ofcast iron and steel, which came to a large ex-tent from the Ruhr district. In the importa-tion of food products the Ruhr district is ofsimilar importance.
The economic influence of the Ruhr districtupon the rest of Germany is so important thatone is justified in saying that the presence ofcoal in the Ruhr district is largely responsiblefor the great transformation produced in Ger-man industry, whereby Germany changed froman agricultural nation to a highly developedindustrial nation.
THE GREAT GERMAN COMBINES.
As stated before, the Ruhr district containsthe bulk of the coal, iron, and other industriesof the nation and furnishes the coal for a largenumber of public utilities, railways, and otherindustrial enterprises throughout Germany.Consequently, the Ruhr became the center ofGermany's industrial and economic system,which at present is more completely organizedand more closely controlled by a small number ofcombines than is the case in any other countryin the world. The powerful combines andsyndicates which to-day control Germany'sindustries have their head offices in the Ruhror in near-by cities. The activities of thesesyndicates are so closely connected with theentire industrial structure of the Ruhr districtthat a discussion of their organization anddevelopment is necessary for a more completeanalysis of the present industrial status of theRuhr district.
Long before the outbreak of the war a numberof concerns in Germany combined the manu-facture of iron and steel products with theproduction of such primary materials as ironore, coal, and coke. Although the formation of
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 62: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL EESERVE BULLETIN. 197
combines dates as far back as 1862, when thefirst German tin-plate syndicate was formed,their present organization and economic im-portance date only since the armistice.
The isolated condition in which Germanyfound herself at the end of the war, the greatloss of valuable territories and of importantsources of raw material, especially iron ore andcoal, and the heavy burden of reparation allnecessitated closer cooperation among the vari-ous industries of the country. The promotingof "vertical" and "horizontal" syndicates wasfurther encouraged by the fact that many Ger-man independent concerns which had lost theirconnections and plants in Alsace-Lorraine andLuxemburg combined with other firms to formbetter working units. The greatest resultswere achieved in the mining and closely alliedsteel and iron industries. Here the verticalform of syndicate is predominant and mostlyfavored. The 13 great combines at presentexisting in Germany are so organized that theyappear as entirely independent and self-suffi-cient units, beginning with the production ofiron ore, coal, and coke, and ending with themanufacture of finished products such as loco-motives, cars, and a large number of hardwareand other highly finished steel products.
Not satisfied with the full control over rawmaterials and the plants involved in the variousphases of production of the above-mentionedcommodities, these combines brought undertheir influence a number of transportationcompanies operating on land and sea. Further-more, they established their own sales officesin Germany as well as abroad, so that the goodsproduced by them are under their control untilthey reach the final consumer. Most of thecombines are closely connected with largebanking institutions which enable them to doth^ir financing on most favorable terms.
In the following paragraphs is a brief dis-cussion of the 10 most important combineswith headquarters in the Ruhr or in near-bycities. Although some of the plants of theabove concerns are located outside the Ruhrdistrict, the most important plants, especiallythose engaged in the mining of coal and theproduction of steel and iron, are located in theRuhr district. In most cases the operationof all plants is so closely connected and inter-locked, and the plants located outside of theRuhr district are to such an extent dependentupon the raw materials and half-finished prod-ucts of their allied organizations in the Ruhrdistrict, that any economic rupture or theestablishment of a tariff barrier between the
30425—23 5
two would immediately result in a decreasoof output of all the plants and in some caseseven lead to a complete standstill.
1. Siemens Rhein Elbe Scliuckert Union.—This is the most important of all syndicates ofGermany and consists of the following fiveconcerns, each of which is in turn a separatointegrated group.
1. Gelsenkirchener Bcrgwerks A. G.2. Deutsch Luxemburgischo Bergwerke und lltitten
A. G., Bochum. •3. Bochumer Yerein fur Bergbau n. Gusstahlfab-
rikation, Bochum.4. Siemens & llalske A. G., Berlin.5. Elecktrizitate A. G. vornials Schuckert & Co.
These five concerns, each of which controls anumber of industrial and electrical plants andcoal and iron mines, are combined into onehuge corporation whose board of directors isin charge of the entire operation and disposi-tion of the output of all tho mines and plants.The vastness of this enterprise can bo gaugedfrom the, fact that one concern alono, thoGelsenkirchen, employed during tho fiscalyear 1920-21 more than 55,000 men. Thoplants and mines of tho first three concernsare located almost exclusively in tho Ruhr orother occupied territory. Tho third and fourthgroups also have interests outside tho Ruhr.The executive ollices ot tiio corporation, uow-ever, aro in Dtisseldorf, just outside the RuhrValley. This combine controls 05 iron-oremines, 26 coal mines, 26 blast furnaces, 12different kinds of steel plants, 21 puddlingfurnaces, and 24 rolling mills. Statistics ofthe output of iron ore and the production ofiron and steel products of all combines to bodiscussed in this article aro very incompleteand therefore will not bo reproduced hero.The quantity of coal produced, however, iscarefully recorded and ior the combine underdiscussion is as follows:
[In tons.]
1913 1920
Coal i 17,405,000Coke. 4,494,000
12,002,0003,090,000
This combine is generally known abroad asthe Stinnes Syndicate, and in fact Mr. Stinnesas the main shareholder of the Deutsch Lux-emburger Werke was primarily responsible forthe formation of this syndicate. A clear dis-tinction, however, must be made between thiscombine, which is an integrated unit in itself,and the original Stinnes group usually knownunder the name of Hugo Stinnes Mublheim-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 63: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
198 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
Ruhr. The former is mainly interested inmining and in the production of steel and iron,while the latter is more in the nature of a largeholding company, which controls a number ofshipping companies such as the Hugo StinnesShipping Co., Hamburg, export and importhouses, and other mercantile establishmentsin Germany and abroad. The last especiallyare of great importance, for the " Stinnes " salesoffices abroad are in many cases agents for theother German combines. Since a number ofplants and firms of the original Stinnes groupare located outside the Ruhr and little dataregarding their production are available, nodetailed discussion of the original Hugo Stinnescombine can be undertaken nere.
2. Kloclcner combine.—This combine is jessimportant as regards output of coal and ironthan the two groups controlled by Sttanes.The chief member of this group is the Loth-ringen Bergwerks und Hiitten Verein, most ofwhose iron and steel mines were located inLorraine. After the cession of this Prov-ince to France, the " Verein" had a number ofsteel mills, rolling plants, and blast furnaces,but no iron and coal of its own. During thethree years following the armistice it acquiredcontrol of a number of mines and also reacheda working agreement with other organizationscontrolling iron and coal mines. At present itis a complete vertical combine consisting of8 ore mines, 7 coal mines, 7 blast furnaces, 5different kinds of steel plants, 7 puddlingfurnaces, and 13 rolling plants. The coaland coke output of the mines of this concernfor the years 1913 and 1920 were:
[In tons.]
CoalCoke
1913
3,504,0001,297,000
1920
2,856,0001,013,000
5. Haniel group.—This combine is an out-growth of the Haniel concern controlled bythe Haniel family. After the armistice itreached a working arrangement with a num-ber of other concerns, so that at presentthe group has under its control 6 ore mines, 7coal mines, 11 blast furnaces, 4 steel plants, and8 rolling mills. Its coal and coke output forthe years 1913 and 1920 was:
[In tons}
CoalCoke
1913
10,449,0002,045,000
1920
7,257,0001,889,000
Although this group possesses a number ocoal and iron mines, its main activities are concentrated on the production of finished steeand iron products such as wharves, bridges, lo-comotives, etc. Its output of steel and ironduring 1921 amounted to 800,000 tons of castiron and 850,000 tons of steel.
4. Stumm combine.—The organization of thiscombine is more or less in the nature of a hold-ing company which controls and operates anumber of industrial establishments and ironand coal mines. I t also differs from the organ-ization of the previously discussed combines inthat the various concerns under its controlform both a vertical and horizontal syndicateand that French capital is interested to a con-siderable extent in one of the important con-stituent companies. At present this grouphas under its control 9 ore mines, 3 coal mines,3 blast furnaces, 7 steel plants of differenttypes, 1 puddling plant, and 14 rolling mills.Its coal and coke output for 1913 and 1920 was:
[In tons.]
CoalCoke
1913
2,431,000683,000
1920
1,758,000475,000
5. Henschel Loihringen Essener SteirikolilenVereinigung.—This group was founded, in 1921mainly as a horizontal syndicate controlling anumber of coal mines. In 1922 a number ofiron and steel plants were brought under itssphere of influence, so that it has assumed inpart the character of a vertical combine.About the middle of 1922 it controlled 12 oremines, 21 coal mines (not including those incourse of development), 5 blast furnaces, 2steel plants, and 2 rolling mills. Its coal andcoke output for 1913 and 1920 was:
[In tons.]
CoalCoke
1913
5,491,000889,000
1920
3,978,000738,000
Recently the chemical interests of this syn-dicate have been enlarged and the well-knownBadische Anilin works have come under itsinfluence.
6. RJieinstdhl Areriberg.—This combine wasfounded in February, 1921, and is to a largeextent under the control of Otto Wolff, who
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 64: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 199
lias large interests within and outside theKuhr district. It controls 6 ore mines, 8 coalmines, 6 blast furnaces, 5 different types ofsteel plants, and 12 rolling mills. Its coal andcoke output for 1913 and 1920 was:
[In torn.]
1913
Coal*.•Coke.
4.822.0001,229,000
1020
4,175,000963,000
7. FriedricJi Krupp,—This is perhaps themost completely integrated of all combines inGermany. It consists of a number of smallergroups, which in turn are generally integratedand independent. After the armistice a com-plete reorganization was carried through inpractically all Krupp plants, for during the en-tire period 1914-1918 the Krupp works wereproducing mainly war material. The adapta-tion to the changed conditions was thereforemuch more difficult for the Krupp combinethan for most German plants. After the re-organization a working arrangement was reachedwith several other groups, including the Ger-man General Electric Co- and the Otto Wolffinterests. This combine controls 37 ore mines,6 coal mines, 17 blast furnaces, 5 various steelplants, and 12 rolling plants. The output ofcoal and coke of the mines under its controlwas:
[In tons.]
Coal . . . .Coke
1913
7,560,0002,263,000
1920
5,881,0001,850,000
During 1921-22 it produced 1,500,000 tonsof cast iron and 1,300,000 tons of steel. Sincethe beginning of 1922 a further expansion hastaken place, mainly with regard to sales officesand transportation companies.
5. Hoesch Koln Neu-Essen—This group wasfounded at- the end of 1920, and its syndicateagreement runs for 80 years. The group in-cludes 5 ore mines, 4 coal mines, 7 blast fur-naces, 2 steel plants, and 7 rolling plants. Itsproduction of coal and coke for 1913 and 1920was:
[In tons.]
Coal. . . .Coke. . .
1913
4,497,0001,073,000
1920
3,679,0001,115,000
0, Phoenix combine,— Although this grouphas suffered heavy losses in Lorraine, where itsmain iron mines and plants were located, itfollowed a policy of expansion to a smallerextent than the other Ituhr combines. Fur-thermore, about 25 per cent of its total capitalstock is owned by Dutch steel interests. Atpresent it controls 1 ore mine, 5 coal mines,18 blast furnaces, 5 stool plants, 21 rolling mills,and 1 puddling plant, its coal and coke out-put for 1033 and 1920 was:
1913
Coal..Coke.
1930
.r>, 189,000670,000 | 384, m)
During the past two months a tendencytoward a much larger expansion has set in,and a number of iron and steel plants as wellas transportation companies nave becomeclosely allied with the Phoenix combine.
10. Tfiyssen.—As with the Phoenix, so theThyssen concern suffered heavily from thecession of Lorraine to France. It also fol-lowed a policy of expansion to a lesser degreethan most other Itunr combines and thus hasremained more or less a one-family organizationcontrolled by the Thyssen familw The num-ber of plants and mines controlled to-day bythis combine is almost the same as it wasbefore the war, and includes 15 ore mines, 3coal mines, 3 blast furnaces, 10 different classesof steel plants, and 19 rolling mills. Its pro-duction of coal and coke during 1913 and 1920amounted to:
CoalCoke
[In tons.]
i
1913
4,506,5001,490,000
1920
3,345,000888,000
THE RHEINISOH-WESTPHALIAN COAL SYNDICATE.
The best illustration of how far the concen-tration of German industry has proceeded ispresented by the Rheinisch-Westphalian CoalSyndicate, of which all previously-discussedcombines are members. The leading purposeof this combination, whose head office is inEssen, is to eliminate all price competitionamong its members, to regulate the production,and to fix the prices of coal. With this endin view it entered into an agreement with themine owners, members oi the syndicate,
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 65: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
200 FEDERAL EESERVE BULLETIN", FEBRUARY, 1923.
whereby it undertook to buy the entire out-put of their mines; the mine owners, on theother hand, undertaking to sell their coal andcoke exclusively to the syndicate under certainarrangements as to price and payment. Themine owners further agreed witn the syndicateand with each other to form an organizationof mine owners (mine owners' assembly), whichmay make certain rules and confer authorityon certain members of the syndicate whichall mine owners agree to obey.
The chief function of the mine owners' assem-bly is to determine (a) the amount of coal tobe produced; (6) the quota of contribution andcompensation; and (c) admission of new mem-bers. Heavy penalties are provided for non-compliance with the rules adopted by the syndi-cate, and a special commission is establishedwith authority to examine the books andrecords of the members and to supervise alltheir activities.
The duration of the syndicate is only for acertain limited period and must be renewedfrom time to time. The next to the last re-newal took place in 1917, when the duration ofthe syndicate was prolonged for five years. Itwas recognized in 1919 by the Reichskohlenrat(Federal Coal Council), which was granted bythe Government the power to exercise super-visory powers over the coal syndicate, especiallywith regard to fixing the price of coal. The1917 agreement expired on March 30, 1922, butdue to the uncertain economic and politicalconditions prevailing in Germany at that time.it was not renewed until May, 1922. Thenew contract runs only for 11 months, i. e.; upto April 1, 1923.
The importance of the syndicate is seen ifone compares the output of coal from the minesunder its control with the total coal productionof Germany.
COAL PRODUCTION OF THE RHEINISCH-WESTPHALIANSYNDICATE COMPARED WITH THE TOTAL PRODUCTIONOP GERMANY.
[In thousands of tons]
Rheinisch-Westphalian SyndicateTotal GermanyPercentage of syndicate out of total
1921-22
93,733145,785
64.3
1920-21
87,546140,757
62.2
1913-14
101,652190.109
53.5
The percentage of the coal produced by thesyndicate mines increased steadily, especiallyduring the fiscal year 1921-22. The loss ofimportant coal fields in Upper Silesia furtherincreased the percentage 01 the coal produced
by the mines of the Rheinisch-WestphalianCtoal Syndicate.
Its control of the coke output of the countryis even larger than that over coal. Out of atotal production of coke during the fiscal yearApril, 1921-March 30, 1922, amounting to *27,963,000 tons, 26,430,350 tons, pr 94.5 percent, were produced by members of the syndi-cate.
The syndicate played also a very importantpart in the delivery of coal and COKO for repa- .ration account. Of the total quantity ofcoal and coke delivered during the fiscal year1921-22 amounting to 38,757,780 tons of coaland coke,1 10,071,283 tons of coal and briquetsand 4,309,165 tons of coke came from theRheinisch-Westphlian Coal Syndicate. Onlythrough the complete organization of practi-cally all the coal mines located in the Ruhr wasthe" German Government enabled to makethese huge deliveries without demoralizing theentire coal and coke industries of the country.
Upon occupation of Essen by French andBelgian troops, the syndicate removed itsrecords and head office to Hamburg. This stepin itself will make the delivery of coal forreparation account very difficult, even if theGerman mine owners should be willing to makedeliveries, for instead of dealing with one bodyhaving full authority as to total output andparticipation of almost all mines, the repre-sentatives of the French Government wouldhave to make separate contracts with a consid-erable number of individual mine owners.
SWEDEN.
Because of the exceptional importance ofprice and exchange movements since the armi-stice in different parts of the world, and par-ticularly because Swedish prices have followedmuch the same course as prices in the UnitedStates, it is believed that the following articlefrom a Swedish source will be of interest toreaders in this country. The article originallyappeared in the issue of Social-Demokraten forDecember 6,1922, and the translation has beensupplied by the American consulate at Stock-hol
THE COUBSE OP PBICES IN SWEDEN—SOME INTERNATIONALCOMPARISONS.
When the great price wave at last reached its culmina-tion during the fall of 1920 and the long expected down-ward trend became a certainty, the question uppermostin the minds of all was," At what figure above the pre-warlevel will the bottom be reached?" It was generally con-ceded that a return to the prices of 1914 was out of the
i Coke converted Into its coal equivalent.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 66: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
FEBRUAKX, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 201
question, and estimates and guesses usually stopped atdouble these prices, or in other words, an index figure of200. In less than a year, however, this limit was passedby the wholesale price index published by the SwedishJournal of Commerce (Svensk Handelstidning), which wasfollowed April 1, 1922, by the cost of living index calcu-lated by the Department of Social Affairs. At that timethe prophecies had come down to the figure of 175 andwere later, as a result of continued further reductions, toremain for the time being at a level one and one-half timesas high as the pre-war prices. Now even this point haspractically been reached. The wholesale price index,now made public by the Goteborg Commerce Journal(Goteborgs Hand els tidning), reports for the month of Octo-ber, 1922, the figure of 155, and the Board of Trade's indexfigure for the price of raw materials is 149, while manufac-tures still remained at 186, according to the Board ofTrade, whose general wholesale price index was 169.Simultaneously the Department of Social Affairs reporteda cost of living index figure of 190.
Thus far, therefore, the attempts at prophesying thelimit of the fall in prices have proved just as fruitless asthose during the war to determine the limit of the rise inprices. Will the 150 limit now prove as unstablo as theformer ones, and the prices fall still lower? Lately theopinion has been expressed that not only will a stabiliza-tion of prices take place at this level, but a gradual increaseis to be expected. As a principal objection to all theseprophecies, Professor Cassel has stated that it is impossibleto talk of an international price level and draw conclusionstherefrom, as has been done in this case, until a universalgold standard exists. Theoretically this is naturally quitecorrect, but, on the other hand, it would seem that theSwedish exchange is now so near its gold value that calcu-lations can profitably be made upon the supposition thatthe Swedish krona will even in the future maintain its goldparity—that is, approximately its normal peace value incomparison with the dollar. I t is evident that the basisof all estimates of the above nature must be the Americanprice level.
As a matter of course^ the problem actually divides itselfinto two, viz, first, that of forming an idea of the wholesaleprice level's future movements based upon internationaland domestic tendencies, and, second, that of endeavoringto make clear, on the basis of such movements and otherfactors influenced by the cost of living, what is to be ex-pected in connection with the question of the developmentof retail prices and other living costs. The first questionwill be discussed below, while the latter must be sparedfor another article. - I T
As regards wholesale prices, the Swedish price levelhas, like that of other countries with a high exchange,followed the price index of the United States very closely.As long as the latter continued to fall, it was only to beexpected that there should be a continued fall in thoseother countries in which the demand has been and ismaintained that the exchange be restored to its formerposition of parity with the dollar so that the redemptionm gold of paper currency might again be resumed bythese Governments on the old basis.
The American wholesale price index has, for the pasthalf year, not shown any tendency downward, but on thecontrary a considerable increase has set in. For tins rea-son it has been assumed that the bottom has been reachedin America and a rise in prices is to be expected, uponcloser examination of the American price movements andfactors operating in connection therewith, it becomes evi-dent that such a conclusion must be considered ratherdoubtful. ' . .. . ,, , ' ,
A glance at the American figures indicate that theincrease was mainly due to the rise in the price of coal and
coke, resulting from tho recent coal mino strike duringthe first half of this year. From an index figure of KJO inFebruary, theso commodities have boon recorded as highas 5G0 in August, but have successively fallen to 382 and32J) during the two following months. Tin's last figure isabnormally high, however (compared, for example, withthe coal and coke price index in England of 165, andSweden of 109). These high coal and coke prices con-tribute indirectly toward raising tho general index figureby causing a rise in production costs of various industries.Thus the main increases in the metal group can be ascribedto this cause. The coal prices arc, however, rapidly fall-ing again and there is no reason to suppose that tho aboveincrease in the price index will have any permanenteffect.
During October, however, there has been such a generalrise in the American index figures that it can not be laidto the results of the coal strike. On tho contrary, it ispossible to trace in this action a direct influence of theconsiderably increased tariff effective September 22.
Neither tho one nor the other of the above-mentionedfactors would seeemingly reflect upon the wholesale priceindex of this country, however, at least not in any onodirection. As the increased duties produce a riso in theproduction costs in America, a certain rise can also beexpected here, but this will be counteracted by tho effectof the high tariff wall on the importation by America, afact which Professor Cassel has likewise pointed out.
Comparing the Swedish and American index figures forvarious groups for the month of October, it is found thatthe American figures are always lower than the Swedishas regards most of the commodities, so that the rise ofprices in America must reach considerably greater dimen-sions before any influence upon the rise in prices here canbe expected. The American figures arc higher only forcoal and coke (according to tho G&teborgs Ilandelstidning329 compared with 1C9), metals (1C2 compared with 117),and hides and leather (114 compared with 91). In theopposite direction the differences are considerable for theimportant groups of vegetable food products (]22 for UnitedStates compared with 143 for Sweden, which difference,however, can be explained by the price of sugar in Sweden,which difference, however, can change), animal foodproducts (138 compared with ICG), and agricultural sup-plies (119 compared with 15S). As regards the last-nameditem, a further approach toward the American figure canbe expected shortly.
The above conclusions are likewise evident from a com-parison of tho Swedish and English figures for October.Considering that the English pound is now from 7 to 8per cent lower than the Swedish krona in relation tothe pre-war parity, there is no group of commoditiesregistering a higher price than tho Swedish, and manywhich fail far below the Swedish prices.
From the above it would be reasonable to concludethat the rise in prices in America or England have notgone so far that a corresponding rise in Sweden shouldresult. On the contrary, a general stabilization of pricesand a tendency toward reduction is rather to be expected,with possibly a rise in the prices of some commodities, butvery likely a reduction in others.
The index figure of the Board of Trade mentioned aboveshows, among other things, the difference in the develop-ment of the pre-war prices between raw materials andmanufactures. Tho index figure for October is, withoutdoubt, worthy of notice. The difference is great, the figurebeing 149 for the former and 186 for the latter. Thisdifference is, without doubt, of some importance. Sincethe price of raw materials during the entire past year hasshown only a small reduction, and in certain cases a slightincrease, the margin of difference can not be explained by
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 67: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
202 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
saying that the manufactures have necessarily been madefrom higher priced raw materials and therefore naturallymust cost more than those now made from cheaper rawmaterials. The correct explanation is undoubtedly theone which is most natural, namely, that manufacturingindustries have not yet been able to adapt themselves tothe reduced price of rav»* materials, but continue to operatewith factory and transportation costs which are greatlyout of proportion to those prevalent before the war. Incertain instances the monopoly existing within industrycan be shown to be the cause of the high prices.
As examples of the large disproportion between theprices of raw materials and manufactured articles, thefollowing index figures for October, according to thecalculations of the Board of Trade, may be cited:
Pig iron 134Steel and iron
manufactures 150
Textiles.. . . 157 j Leather 117Yams 185 ! Shoes 1G4Weavings.... 221! Iron ore 112Hides 02 I Coke 88
t In certain cases, as in the last-mentioned examples,it is to be expected that the prices of raw materials willrise as soon as the manufacturing industries begin operatingon a larger scale. The general rule will be, however,that the manufacturer will have to take the largest stepin order to restore reasonable proportions as comparedwith the prices of raw material. No other proportioncan be called reasonable than that under which the rela-tive costs of merchandise become the same as in pre-wardays. In other words, the finished article is to correspondto that of the raw material.
Even with regard to manufactures as a whole a successivereduction may be predicted, but naturally it is to beexpected that the reduction, as hitherto, will take placeslowly, at least in certain branches, especially in the caseof such articles where a monopoly exists for the supplyingof the demand of the internal market and where the publicdemand is steady and not as elastic as is the case withregard to the articles that are "most necessary.
CHILE.
^ The Chilean economic situation was dis-tinctly more favorable during the last threemonths of 1922. The recent weakening ofChilean exchange seems to have been due tospeculative influences, in view of the essen-tially sound general situation. Sales of nitratehave continued to increase in volume and stillbetter results are expected during the busyseason from December until March. Unem-ployment has been considerably reduced in thenitrate and copper industries as well as in under-takings of the nature of public improvements.Commercial transactions increased in volumeduring the last quarter of the year, and if theadverse conditions prevailing in Europe do nothave too great an influence upon the generalmarket for raw materials produced by Chile, arapid advance toward economic normalcy inthat country may be expected. According torecent reports, a larger flow of American invest-ment capital has been apparent in Chile duringthe latter half of 1922, which is being employedprincipally in real estate mortgages, bonds,
and mining property. The losses of capital onaccount of tne recent earthquakes are not suf-ficient to affect foreign trade seriously.
THE EXCHANGE SITUATION*.
Notwithstanding the increasing exports ofnitrate, the gradual weakening 01 the Chileanpeso, which started early in October, 1922,continued until the close of the year. Theaverage quotation for dollar exchange in Chilein January, 1922, was 10.42 pesos. The risewhich began in the following month was dueprincipally to the considerable advance sellingof foreign ^exchange by the nitrate producers,who were confident that the gradual liquida-tion of the large stocks of nitrate in Europe andthe exhaustion of those in the United Stateswould result in a renewal of sales at a new scaleof prices. The result was that before the salesof the new nitrate year started, the Chileanpeso had advanced in value over 25 per cent.Thus, on the one hand, the speculative opera-tions of the nitrate producers, who sold inadvance at from 37 to 45 pesos per poundsterling the bills which they expected to receiveat a later date in payment for nitrate ship-ments, were responsible for the decline in theChilean exchange which started in October;and, on the other hand, speculation in antici-pation of the Government loan of $18,000,000recently placed in the United States was astrong factor responsible for the sudden changein the trend of the value of the peso. Thegeneral belief in Chile was that the entire pro-ceeds of the loan would be spent in Chile afterbeing converted into paper pesos. This coursewould naturally have resulted in bringing abouta rapid rise in the value of the local currency.When the fact was made clear that the majorportion of the loan had been assigned to firmsin London and New York to take care of matur-ing obligations of the Government, the suddenaction on the part of traders to cover theirtransactions brought about a considerabledecline in local exchange. That portion ofthe proceeds of the loan which was actuallybrought into Chile was used by the Governmentprincipally in the payment of salary arrearsand the liquidation of accounts with severalmunicipalities. The position of the Govern-ment has been temporarily improved as aresult of the distribution in Chile of theimported portion of the.New York loan, but apermanent improvement is not to be expecteduntil further revenue-producing measures, suchas the income-tax legislation now under con-sideration, are put into effect.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 68: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 20
TRADE CONDITIONS.
The movement of foreign trade, as judgedby the customhouse collections, has been satis-factory. At the end of September, 1922, thetotal sales of nitrate effected for delivery sinceJuly 1 amounted to about 900,000 tons. Salesfor delivery during July and August amountedto 405,000 tons. Exportation of nitrate duringthe same period totaled 272,000 tons, and it isestimated that there remained at the beginningof October on the coast about 150,000 tons soldbut unshipped. As a result of the encouragingprospect for the nitrate industry, it is reportedthat about 50 plants will be opened for produc-tion within a short time, as against a total^ of31 producing plants during the dullest periodin 1921. Reports of several nitrate delegationsin Europe reveal a general condition of depletedstocks there. It is upon the European con-sumption that the success of the nitrate seasondepends, and the hope is entertained in Chilethat the European demand will warrant thecontinuation of nitrate production on thepresent basis and a consumption sufficient tohelp toward the liquidation of the Chileanstocks. This would bring about, within a shorttime, the renewal of production in Chile upon ascale that would result in economic equilibriumin that country. The feeling exists at presentamong nitrate producers in Chile that nitrateprices are too low, and the association has an-nounced that sales for delivery later than March,1923, will not be made at prices in force atpresent. An indication of the strong confi-dence which prevails in-Europe regarding theChilean nitrate industry may be, seen in thefact that when a nitrate company in the Anto-fagasta district recently offered bonds for£300,000, the issue was oversubscribed sixtimes in the one hour that the books remainedopen. Unemployment in the nitrate districtsno longer exists. There is now employment forall the labor available, and laborers from otherparts of Chile are returning to the nitrate sec-tion.
Exports of copper for the eight monthsended August 31 amounted to about 83,464tons. This amount compares most favorablywith the total exports for the same period in1921, which amounted to about 40,000 tons.Although the recent slight fall in the price of cop-per as well as the decrease in the demand fromthe United States have affected production inthe small mines, the stronger companies areproceeding to produce copper on a considerablylarger scale. This is probably due to the factthat the copper companies will be able to take
advantage of lower production costs, since production at present is not attended with the restrictions and difficulties incident to times of wa]or market inactivity. It is reported also thaistocks of wool held in the southern region arebeing reduced, although large stocks held inPunta Arenas still remain unsold.
The import trade has not shown signs ofconsiderable activity, although it is moresatisfactory than at an\r time during the pasttwo 3Tearsl! While its volume has not in-creased to any large extent, it representstransactions on a sound basis of credit andof volume proportional to current demands.Importations have been almost entirely lim-ited to articles of necessity, luxuries andcostly merchandise being rather the exception.This has undoubtedly been due principally tothe low level of Chilean exchange.
GOVERNMENT FINANCES.
Thb loan for 135,000,000 paper pesos waspartly negotiated in New York and partlym Chile. The American loan amounted to$18,000,000 and was recently offered by theNational City Co. of New York. The otherportion of the loan, amounting to 30,000,000pesos, was placed among four banking institu-tions in Chile, the Bank of Chile underwriting20,000,000 pesos of the loan. The bonds areissued for a term of seven years, bear 8 percent interest, and are exempt from all taxation,either fiscal or municipal. Whatever sums maybe produced by duties collected on exports ofnitrate during the year 1922 in excess of38,870,000 gold pesos, and during the vear1923 in excess of 54,418,000 gold pesos will beapplied to amortization of the loan.
During recent months municipal loanshave been under discussion in Santiago andValparaiso and, according to recent reports,authorization of these loans by the NationalCongress is expected within a short time.
CUBA.
THE SUGAR CROP.
The harvesting of the 1922-23 sugar crop,which started in November, has shown satis-factory results, and a general feeling of op-timism prevails throughout the island. I t isof importance to note, however, that the ma-jority of the sugar mills in operation atpresent are foreign owned and that the domes-tioenterprises are still more or less extensivelycommitted to foreign banks. This means that
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 69: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
204 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
a considerable portion of the sugar producedduring the present season will be exportedfrom Cuba without bringing into the islandcorresponding returns which would affect thecurrent trade balance.
The final figures showing the total amountof sugar produced during the sugar seasonof 1921-22 indicate that this crop was largerthan in any previous year, notwithstandingthe fact that several centrals remained closedthroughout the season. The following tablegives a comparison of the 1921-22 sugarcrop with five preceding crops ?
Crop. obtained(tons,
2,240 lbs).
1016-17 ! 3,051,9971017-1S ' 3,473,1*41918-10.... i 4,000,7371919-20 3F735,4-r>1920-21 3,934,2971921-22 4,033,455
Molasses j Sugarobtained j yield i(gallons), (per cent)
Cane ground(arrobas,
25 lbs.).
160,287,484 I174,612,257227,083,679 !185,091,804 i210,945,113 I203,146,196 '
2" I
11.2310.8G10.7610.9910.9111.77
I
2,522,225,7532,785,649,8883,231,937,2313,024,123,5783,268,660,5463,069,958,733
The estimates of the 1922-23 sugar cropindicate a further increase in the total out-put. According to the most reliable esti-mates the crop will amount to about 4,223,000tons of 2,240 pounds each. In December,1022, 46 sugar mills were grinding, as com-pared Ayith 19 in the same month in 1921and 18 in 1920.
TOBACCO CROP.
The tobacco crop for 1921-22 was a smallone, and it is therefore expected that there willbe no difficulty in disposing of the stocks held.During the first nine months of 1922, 6,082,775kilos of leaf tobacco, valued fit $8,521,434,wore exported through Habana, besides 4,629,-136 kilos of stemmed tobacco, valued at$8,996,533.
CREDIT CONDITIONS.
Loans are still being made with a great dealof caution by banks at rates of interest whichrange between 10 and 12 per cent on first-classcommercial paper, The general improvementin the situation, however, has been reflected inthe operations of the credit institutions, sincecommercial credits are being obtained moreeasily and upon better terms than in anyperiod during 1922. Branches of foreign banksoperating in Cuba have been instrumental inintroducing into the island the use of tradeacceptances. These documents are meetingwith increasing popularity. The supply of
capital available to finance buildingand otherlong-term operations is not organized in amanner that would produce the most effectiveresults. Up to the present time there hasbeen no apparent movement toward the estab-lishment in Cuba of associations of joint invest-ment to finance building projects. Consider-able activity may be noticed, nevertheless, inbuilding operations, which is partly due tothe desire on the part of the public to investtheir surplus funds in operations of that char-acter instead of depositing them in banks.
BANKING LIQUIDATION.
The process of liquidation pursued by thebanking commission has been attended bymany difficulties which have delayed the finalliquidation of the affairs of the banks under itsjurisdiction. This has given rise to severecriticism on the part of the creditors, voicedthrough the Cuban press. According to Mr.Clarence Marine, a member of the Bank Liqui-dating Commission,1 this institution has at pres-ent under its control 18 banks and about 300branches, with combined assets at the time ofthe suspension of payments amounting to$166,091,901, and liabilities amounting to$142,118,004. One of the principal difficultiesencountered has been that of harmonizing theprovisions of the banking liquidation law withthe commercial code and laws formerly in force.Mr. Marine has further stated that it has beenalmost impossible to find a market for even thehighest class of securities held by the banks;ordinary collections have been" difficult toeffect; and forced liquidation has been con-fined almost entirely to transactions involvinga small percentage of payment in cash and thebalance in checks or mortgages to be liquidatedat public sales. One of the principal reasonsfor delay, he also stated, has been that thecommission, hoping that conditions would im-prove, especially in the sugar market, has inmost cases restrained the liquidating com-mittees from accepting compensation in papersecured by collateral or by mortgages, althougha movement has been on foot to secure theremoval of all restrictions on compensation as ameans to more rapid liquidation. However,the various liquidating committees have re-duced to 20 the 300 branches of the banksunder their control. Expenses have been cur-tailed extensively, and during the period thatthe banks have been in liquidation the totalliabilities have decreased to $127,440,339.
l A full description of the creation and functions of the Bank LiquidatingCommission was given in the July, 1922, issue of the BULLETIN, p. 827.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 70: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 205
GOVERNMENT FINANCES.
In the month of July, 1922, the Cuban budgetfor the fiscal year 1922-23 went into effect. Afull discussion of this budget was presented inthe August, 1922, issue of the BULLETIN (p.960). According to statements recently issuedby the Treasury Department of the island, theactual revenues obtained since the budgetwent into effect have exceeded the estimatedrevenues in the budget law for 1922-23. Byarrangements with the banks of the HabanaClearing Houso, all current expenses of theGovernment are being promptly paid, withthe result that a remarkable improvement liasbeen noticed in the general attitude toward theGovernment's credit. The following tableshows the revenue collected by the CubanGovernment during the first four months (July-October) of the fiscal year 1922-23, as com-pared with the revenue estimated in themidget law, on the same basis of four months.It may be noticed that the total excess of actualrevenue over estimated revenue amounted to$132,576 during the period mentioned.
Items.
Customs:Tariff dutiesTonnage duesOther income
TotalTort duesConsular feesPostal revenuesTaxes on profits:
Banks, stock com-panies, sugar pro-ducers , caneplanters, etc
Mining, 6 per cent..Industry and com-
merce, 4 per cent.Total
Inheritance and trans-fer of property
Documentary stamptax
Tax on sugar produc-tion
State rights and prop-erties
Tax on liquors andother articles for theservice of externalloan of 1901
National lotteryMiscellaneous income:
Amount to be paidin by the munic-ipalities for pub-he health services
0 ther income
Grand total..
$28,000,000400,000600,000
Revenueestimatedin budget
law for1922-23.
29,000,000
1 600,0002,000,000
3,500,000
ljooo
1,900,000
3,500,000^000,000
950,000260,000
Estimatedrevenue
for 4months
(one-thirdof precedingcolumn).
$9,333,333133,333200,000
9,666,666
400,000533,333666,667
1,166,667333
633,333
1,800,333
366,667
1,300,000
666,667
142,600
1,266,6671,333,333
316,66686,667
Actualrevenueobtainedin first 4
Increaseor de-creaseover
estimatemonths of | in 1922-23
1922-23. I budget! law.
$9,919,694184,856157,915
+$586,361+ 51,523- 42,085
10,262,465470,312342,972667,599
1,041,30711 571
,359,723
- 190,361
- 125,360+ 11,238
- 273,605
1,412,606
893,561
799,225
156,131
107,761
1,414,2221,549,968
4U,0S9185,931
T87678784T
- 387,
• 595,799
531,894
- 500,775
- 510,536
- 34,839
+ 147,555216,635
94,42399,264
The external debt of Cuba amounts at presentto about §51,000,000 and the internal debtto about $39,000,000. The new loan for
$50,000,000, which was approved by theCuban Congress on October 9, 1922, will in-crease the indebtedness to about $128,500,000,after liquidating the $5,000,000 loan of J. P.Morgan & Co. iloated in January, 1922, andthe S6;640,800 in bonds of the issues of 1904,1905, and 1917, held by the same bankingfirm. The new loan, offered for subscription bya New York syndicate headed by Messrs. J. I \Morgan & Co., is dated January 15, 1923, andmatures January 15, 1953* It was offered tothe public at 99^ and accrued interest. Accord-ing to the terms of the contract the principaland interest of this loan are payable in UnitedStates gold coin in New York City and areexempt from any Cuban taxes now existing orwhich may hereafter be levied. These bondsare the direct obligation of the Republic ofCuba and, in addition, they are secured by lienon certain revenues of the country. Theseinclude customs revenues, subject to existingcharges but prior to any future charges, andmore specifically a first charge on 10 per centof the amount by which the revenues of theGovernment in each fiscal year exceed860,000,000. Recent reports from Habanaindicate that the proceeds of the loan will beused by the Government as follows:Fund of special accounts $$, 000,000Liquidation of J. P. Morgan & Co. loan 5,000,000Salaries, wages, etc., due before July 1,1922.. 7,000,000Pensions due before July 1, 1922 2,000,000Department of public works, for liquidation
of past-due indebtedness 12,000,000Other departments, and for expenses of audit-
ing and tax collecting (any surplus to de-partment of public works) C, 000,000
Department of public works, for reconstruc-tion and repairs G, 000,000
Interest and sinking fund internal debt (dueprior to July 1,1022)... 3,000,000
Total 50,000,000
The deficit which will probably be createdby the pledging of certain revenues to the newloan will be met, according to the Government,by two new taxes recently created. A 1 percent tax on gross sales is to be levied on allmerchants, manufacturers, or individual estab-lishments. The tax will be based on the exactvalue of the article at the time of sale. Thefollowing will be excepted: Exports of rawmaterials or manufactured products, exceptsirup, wines, and tobacco, when sold directlyby the producer; gross sales of merchandisewhich do not exceed SI,000 for each quarter;and sales made by small retail dealers. Thetax became effective on December 1, 1922.Hotels and restaurants, public utility com-panies, and others are to be taxed 1 per centon gross receipts.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 71: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
206 FEDERAL, RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 192.°.,
PRICE MOVEMENT AND VOLUME OF TRADE.
INTERNATIONAL WHOLESALE PRICE INDEX.
Wholesale prices in December were exceedingly stable in most of the countries covered bythe index numbers of the Federal Eeserve Board. In the United States and Canada there wasno change from the November price level; and in England and Japan there was but a one-point increase. In France, however, there was an increase of 8 points, in comparison withthe rise of 13 points in November. The improved condition of the French and Britishexchanges during December brought about a rise in the price levels of these two countries on agold basis.
The outstanding feature of the price situation in December was the rise of prices of con-sumers7 goods in every country, which, with the increases in this class of goods during theprevious month, seems to indicate the beginning of a marked upward trend from the low pointsof two and three months ago. The other groups showed little change, there being an unusualnumber of commodities among raw materials and producers' goods which remained unchangedin price, and no definite movement of such groups as farm products, steel products, orchemicals.
Prices in France have recently been quite out of line with those of the other countries.The last two months have witnessed striking price increases in that country, especially in agri-cultural products, foods, metals, and textiles.
€00
550
500
450
400
350
300
250
ZOO
ISO
100
INTERNATIONAL WHOLESALE PRICE INDEXFEDERAL RESERVE BDARD
1913 =100
/
//
//
S;
N\
V
\
\
\\ >
\• \
\
\
\
'"V
I
• *•••
Z7-~\
—FRANCECA W AftA
•JAPAN
„ *
s
********
* F. M. A. M. J. J. A. S. 0. N. D. J. F. M. A. M. J. J. A. S. O. K. D. J. F. M. A. M. J. J. A. S. O. N. D. J. F. M. A. M. J. J. A. S. 0. N-
1919 1920 1921 1922
600
550
500
450
400
350
3 0 0
Z50
2 0 0
1S0
100
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 72: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL, BESE11VE .BULLETIN. 207
INTERNATIONAL WHOLESALE PRICE INDEX—FEDERAL RESERVE: IKOAKD.
Year and month.
1913, average1919, average1920, average1921, average1922, average.. .
1021.December ,
1922.JanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJunoJuly -.AugustSeptemberOctober .*.NovemberDecember :
Based on prices in respective currencies.
UnitedStates.
100211239148157
142
i 14214614714915S161
! 165! 1651 161
105104164
England.
100241314201167
172
170167168167171169171IRS165103105ICG
France.
100
473
21>S
287
2862832872993023Q130729s2942043'J7315
Canada. 1 Japan. |i ™
100 100 100207 . . ' 211250 '•' 2o!>lf,7 1KI : 14S149 ISO : 257
145 103 142
144 191 142H'J 185 i 140150 182 ii 147152 180 ; H'J154 ISO ! 1.18153 184 ; 101151 192 !' U,r>110 184 ' 1G5114 J7<; lfil145 171 \G5147 109 i 164
i 147 170 ' 101
Converted to gold basis.
England.
100221242
Ts5ira
147
us150151151150154150tr>4150
us| 1511 157
France.
100
1S5124V27
117
121128134Ml143
m123117
m109UN
Canada.
100
223150147
U 5
137145145US152151152149144145147140
Japan.
100
1*75173
186
15117C1731711711761*41761C9lf.5161lt>7
INDEX NUMBERS OF WHOLESALE PRICES IN THE UNITED STATES.'
[Average prices in 1913=100 1
Year and month. Good*produced.
1919, average.1920, average.1921, average.1922, average.
Goods | Goods Raw'imported:exported, materials.
December.,
JanuaryFebruary. •.MarchAprilNfayJuneJulyAugustSeptember.OctoberNovember.,December..
1921.
1922.
214 I242 J
154 i
140 i
139143 I144 !140 1155 '1531021G2161161ICO160s
174191irti
123
11111011011111511912412812712813513713S
221
157
141
142141144155103
157 i
173174 i
200 jm IH i i
1 4 0114V I145 !147 '1501041G7 j177)H% [I Hi j
!5?l177 i
Fro- |(lurpri!* igood*. !
mZM[42no
127
127127 -120129137141143144147150150 '140
Con- AJJ rom*i
1A complete description of the United States index number, as originally published, may bo found in the M^y, 1020,503. Revisions in nrices or weights appear in the BULLETINS for Juno, 1920; June, 1921; and >fay, 1922.
244l M
157 i1
153 !
If/)155 !157 !150 ;i100 (ir»i '163 I150 I
1 5 7 •'•
DULLKTIN,
INDEX NUMBERS OF WHOLESALE PRICES IN ENGLAND, i
fAverage prices in 1913—100.]
211
us
157
142142J4fl147149
Ifi4U-51H104
Year and month. | Goods ! Goodsproduced.; imported,
Goods Rawexported.; materials.
Pro-d i irers'Roods.
Con- |sinners' !goods. !
All com-
1919, average.. i1920, averape ;1921, average1922, average
1922.JanuaryFebruary *..."" '. *March...AprilMay ; ; ; ;JuneJulyAugust !SeptemberOctober . . . . ;November * 'December j
1923.January
233 I315207 i109 i
!174171 -172171175 i172172 i170 '105160 I161 i163 !
165 j
247291171155
14914S14714S15315415S155157161165103
164 j
27543S
155 j
15S151153152155
159154149154157
1C5
2262911971CS
1711GS1701G710910710S1701001C5160100
167 i
201355178145
147H4142143146145147143M3144146140
151 '
2412922191S1
1S1lfil1S31S3191 j
1S6100
IBi170 |172 !177 !
175 I
314201167 !
170107 !
lftS167171 ;ir»g '•171108165 !103 |1G5105 j
167 j
221242
1481501511M15515415616415014s151157
160
1 A complete description of the British index may be found in the February, 1922, issue of the BULLETIK ,pa$ei 147-153.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 73: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
208 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
INDEX NUMBERS OF WHOLESALE PRICES[Average prices in 1913=100.]
Year and month.
1920, average. . . . . . . .1921, average1922, average -
1921.December
1922.JanuaryFebruaryMarch.. .AprilMay . .June ,JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember :December
Goodspro-
duced.2
466322295
284
2842822883023053053002962S92S6296306
Goodsimported.
536313310
303
29528628228228829530S309320333302361
Goodsexported.
5122SS295
283
27727527227427929229729630130S336333
1 IN FRANCES
Rawmaterials.
506341324
313
308300305318322327332329323328348352
Pro-ducers'goods.2
533248235
230
229227229228226231237238238238
• 248253
Con-sumers'goods.
474348309
294
299300306327333327325303296290296310
All cora-moditias.2
478321298
287
286283287299302304307
•298294294307315
Convertedto goldbasis.
185124127
117
12112S134143143138131123117112109118
'A complete description of the French index may be found in the August, 1922, issue of the BULLETIN, pp . 922-929.
INDEX NUMBERS OF WHOLESALE PRICES IN CANADA.1
[Average prices in 1913=100.]
2 Revised figures.
Year and month.
1919, average..1920, average..1921, average..1922, average.,
January . . . .February.. ,MarchAprilMay ,June ,JulyAugustSeptember..October. . . .November..December...
1922.
Goods ! poods Goodsproduced.,imported, exported,
January..1923.
207249168147
143148150152153151153146140141143143
146 171
Pro-ducers'goods.
188 !255 I174151
147147146146 I147 |150 I152154 !154155 j157 i159 !
160 j
Con-sumers'goods.
227270183164
161164166169168168171166157158160161
163
All com-modities.
207250
: 167149
1441 1491 150
152154153151149144145147147
149
Convertedto goldbasis.
199223150147
137145145148152151152149144145147146
148
1 A complete description of the Canadian index may bo found in the July, 1922, issue of the BULLETIN, pp. 801-806.
INDEX NUMBERS OF WHOLESALE PRICES IN JAPAN.*[Average prices in 1913-100.]
Year and month. Goods | Goodsproduced, imported.
1921, average1922,average ,
1921.December
1922.JanuaryFebruaryMarchApril
wSy : :.JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember,December
186185
201
19819218718618518S107189ISO173170171
154159
154
153151153151157166167160156159166165
Goodsexported.
173189
192
197186175176183192196189189195194192
Rawmaterials.
154165
167
16816315715716416S170161159166173171
Pro-ducers'goods.
18S181
192
1911831S3183182191195187177171168167
Con-sumers'goods.
193189
209
203198195192189191203196185174167171
All com-modities.
181ISO
193
191185182180ISO184192184176171169170
Convertedto goldbasis.
175173
186
1S1176173171171176184176169165164167
* A complete description of the Japanese index may be found in the September, 1922, issue of the BULLETIN, pp . 1052-1059.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 74: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
FEBEUABY, 1923. FEDERAL BESERVE BULLETIN. 209
COMPARATIVE WHOLESALE PRICE LEVELS IN PRINCIPAL COUNTRIES.ALL-COMMODITIES INDEX NUMBERS.*
Year and month.
1913.1914.,19X5.1916.1917.1918..1919.,1920*1921,1922.
1922.JanuaryFebruaryMarchJuneJulyAugus t . . . . . . .September....OctoberNovember.. . .December. . . .
January..1923.
Bel-Minis-try of
Labor.*
(128)
"100
367
356350356360360364385408407
434
Bul-garia;eneral
Statis-
gaiGer
Den-mark;
Finans-tical jtidende.'
Bureau.
(33)
1001031372668
"667W830
« 1,1601,9402,0062,473
2,1722,2722,2872,4362,4892,5262,5312,5582,5642,630
1*100138164228293294382250179
178177182179180180178176180182
181
France;GeneralStatis-tical
Bureau.4
(45)
100101137187262339357510345327
314306307325325331329337352362
387
Ger-many;Frank-furter
Zei-tung.*
(98)
1*100
1,9652,130
32,715
4,2174,5995,4207,8519,102
13,97829,11643,22394,492
166,495
205,417
Ger-many;FederalStatis-tical
Bureau.*
(38)
100106142153179217416
1,4861,911
34,182
3,6654,1035,4337,030
10,05919,20228,69856,G01
115,100147,480
278,476
Italy;RiccardoBachU
(100)
10095133202299409364624578562
Nether-lands;CentralBureauof Sta-tistics.'
(53)
i
5775026335375585715S2601 !59f> j.%0 I
100105145222286392297282181100
16116216116716215515315615S158
Norway(Chris-tiania);Oekono-
miskHevue.»
(93)
2002,=>3240230232227225221221220
220 i
Poland;CentralStaticticalOffice.
(58)
"1151592333413453223772G9220
" 1 0 0
137.579
Spain;Instituteof Geog-raphy
and Sta-tistics."
(74)
100101119141106207204221190170
Sweden;Oo'to-borgs
Handclsoch
SJOfarts-tldnlng."
(47)
59,23163,44573,72987,694
101,587135,786152,365201,326275,047 t346,400 !
179179177177174174173172174172
"100116145185244339330347211162
170179179164165163158155154155
150
Switzer-land;D r . *
Lorenz.*
(71)
100
195160
1761441351601611C3163153100170
175
Year and month.
KUBOPE—continued; NORTH AMERICA.
UnitedKing-dom;
Board ofTrade.
(150)
UnitedKing-dom;
Econo-mist.*
(44)
UnitedKing-dom;
Statist.*
(45)
UnitedStates;Bureauof LaborStatis-tics.
(404)
Canada;Depart-ment ofLabor."
(271)
ASIA AND OCEANIA.
Aus-tralia;
Bureauof Censusand Sta-tistics.*
(92)
China(Shang-
hai);Mlnistr*oin-'
nance.
(147)
DutchEast
Indies;Statis-tical
Bureau.
(17)
India(Cal-
cutta);Depart*ment ofStatis-tics.*
(75)
Japan(Tokyo);Bank orJapan.'
(56)
NewZealand;Depart-ment ofStatis-tics.
(106)
AFRICA,
Egypt(Cairo);Depart-ment ofStatis-tics.
(23)
SouthAfrica;Oflice ofCensusand Sta-tistics.
<187)
1913.1914.1915..1916..1917..1918..1919..1920..1921..1922..
100
1922.JanuaryFebruaryMarchJuneJulyAugustSeptember....OctoberNovember.*..December.....
307197159
164162160160160156154155157155
January,1023.
10099
123161204225235283181159
159158160163163158156I5S15915S
158
100101126159206226242295188153
156 j155 !157 |159157 !152150153 ,153152 I
I
100OS
101127177194206226347149
138141142150155155153154156156
156
1001011101351772062172461S2166
168169166265166164163162104165
IG5
"100
141132155170180218167154
14714714615615715515S1591C2161
moo
133140145146
149150152144144142140143143149
is 232"281is 226186
1641631041671081G3159163164
"10011212S14718019S2041S1ISO
178179182183181178176177178176
1009697117147192236259200190
2062042011972011951931901SS1S3
184
100104123134151175178212201177
1S6181ISO175177177174174175172
"10010212416S207225299171145
150152153139138139138140144147
141
"100
127145158170231
"m
135
131
*133
1 The number of commodities or quotationsused in the computation of each index is indi-cated by figures in parentheses at head of eachcolumn.
* Average of last half of month.* First of month.4 End of month.* Beginning of month—not always the 1st.* Average for the month.T 38 commodities prior to 1920; 76 commodi-
ties during 1921. End of month.
»Based upon price of 52 commodities during1920; 53 during 1921.
9 End of year and end of month.* 15th of the month."Middle of month.M July 1,1913, to June 30,1914-100."April, 1914-100." July 1,1912, to June 30,1914-100.1* July, 1914=100.w Dec. 31,1913, to June 30,1914=100."January, 1914-100.
14 December figure.19 January figure.so As of last Wednesday in month.11 February, 1913=. 100.12 As of Jan. 1.» End of July, 1914-100.*< Jan. 1,1913, to July 31,1914-100.s Average for year.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 75: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
210 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN*. FEBRUARY, 1923.
The foreign index numbers published on thepreceding page are constructed by variousforeign statistical officers and are sent to theFederal Reserve Board by cable. References tothe BULLETIN in which these are described maybe found in the BULLETIN for January, 1923.
.Index numbers showing the price levels ofseparate groups of commodities in the UnitedStates and a few foreign countries are presentedon the following pages. Group index numbers
for the other countries are published only occa-sionally, but such figures may be obtained fromthe Division of Analysis and Research at anytime upon request.
A comparative summary table showing theboard's international index for the UnitedStates, England, Canada, France, and Japanappears on page 207. Group index numbers,computed as part of this international series,will also be found on that page.
GROUP INDEX NUMBERS—UNITED STATES—COMMODITIES IN BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS INDEX REGROUPED BTFEDERAL RESERVE BOARD.
Year and month.
19131919192019211922
1921.December
1922.JanuaryFebruary-MarchAprilMayJuueJulyAugustSeptember . . . . . . . . . . . . .OctoberNovemberDecember '
Raw materials.
IS£fproducts.
(21)100251255134145
130
130
no14114515214614713S136147160161
Animal Forest | Mineralproducts, products.! products,
(21) | (11) | (35)
100221180110125
ioa
109121122120122123130127132132129128
1002113111R5185
169
1671661651671741861S3191199204207211
100179236184207
179
178177178180202211241261236218209208
Totalraw ma-terials.
(88)
100217228142158
137
13914C14714S157159171173168106166167
Pro-ducers'goods.
(117)
100179214135128
125
123113120122125127129129132135136135
Con-sumers'goods.
(199)
Allcommodi-
ties.
(404)
100211231159151
151
146 ;148 I150 ;149150 I151 j152 i149150152155 !157
100206226147149
140
13314114214314S150155155153154156156
GROUP INDEX NUMBERS—UNITED STATES-BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS.
Year and month.
1913191919201021..1922
January....February-..MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember.October...,November..December..
January
1922.
1923.
Farmprod-ucts.
(56)
100231218124133
122131130129132131135131133138143145
143
Foods.
(HO)
100207220144138
13113513713713814014213813S140143144
141
Clothsand
clothing.
(65)
100253295ISO181
176174172171175179180181183188192194
196
Fuel andlighting.
(20)
100181241199218
195191191194216225254271244226218216
218
Metalsand
metalproducts.
(37)
100162192129122
112120109
. 113119120121126134135 i133131
133
Buildingmate-rials.
(41)
Chem-icals and
drugs.
(43)
100201264 I165168
157156155156160167170172180183185185
188
100169200136124
124123125124122122121122124124127130
131
Housefurnish-
inggoods.
(31)
100184254195176
178177175175176176173173173176179182
184
Miscel-laneous.
(25)
100175
»196128117
11711711711G116114114115116120122122
124
Allcommod-
ities.
(404)
100206226147149
13S141142143145150155uh153154156156
156
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 76: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL EESERVE BULLETIN, 211
GROUP INDEX NUMBERS-UNITED KINGDOM—BOARD OF TRADE.
Year and month.
1913 average1920 average1921 average. . . . . .1922 average
1921.December
1922.SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
Cereals.
(17)
Meat aiidfish.
(17)
100273194151
153
143145144141
100263219172
180
174169173174
Otherfoods.
(19)
100279214172
180
152157152156
Totalfood.
(53)
1002722091C5
173
156157160150
Iron andsteel.
(24)
10035S210137
152
132131131131
Other |
S S Cotton.minerals.
(20)
100252179141
140 j139139138
(10)
1004S01921S2
1S3
185184193189
Othertextiles.
(15)
Other !Total notarticles. food.
100 t
172 i
(22)
J0027319G
105
1CS170172172
177
lf.0io:>10S160
(97)
10032a191
105
153151150155
Allarticles.
100307197I.VJ
1GS
154155157155
GROUP INDEX NUMBERS—FRANCE—GENERAL STATISTICAL BUREAU,
Year and month.
1913 average1919 average1920 average1921 average1922 average
1922.JanuarySeptember . . . . . . . .OctoberNovember . .December.
1923.January
Animalfoods.
(8)
100392503380349
309346341365387
Vegetablefoods.
(8)
100313427330295
306279283289300
322
Sugar,coffee, and
cocoa.
(4)
100253422343329
2S9333311345364
412
Allfoods.
(20)
100336459355325
302318313331349
367
Minerals.
(7)
100272449275270
258279309305311
346
Textiles.
(6)
100444737355390
3634184464GS473
533
! A Hindus.Sundries. ! trial
i materials.
(12) (25)
100 i405 j524374 !338 I
350 !
341 '347363 |365 |
377 I
100373550333329
3213393573G9373
404
All corn-mod HI os.
100357510345327
314329337352302
3S7
GROUP INDEX NUMBERS—GERMANY—FEDERAL STATISTICAL BUREAU.
Year and month.
1913 average1919 average .1920 average . . . . . . .1921 average1922 average „
1922.January
Goodsproduced.
(16)
100385
1,2531,786
29,655
3,383
GoodsImported.
(22)
100558
2,6522,533
56,818
5,075
All com-modities.
(38)
100416
1,4861 911
34,182
3,665
Year and month.
1922.SeptemberOctober..*NovemberDecember
1923.January
Goodsproduced.
(16)
25,81549,85395,290
12S,33O
239,005
Goodsimported.
(22)
43,11300,343214,150213,230
475,832 !
All com-modities.
(38)
28,COS50,fX)l
115,100147.4S0
278,470
GROUP INDEX NUMBERS—GERMANY—FRANKFURTER ZEITUNG.i
Year and month.'
July, 1914January, 1920January, 1921 .January, 1922 -
l 9 2 2 -FebruaryMarch. . .
fc::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::June . . . - -JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember •
1923.JanuaryFebruary •
) Latest figures subject to revision.
Foodstuffsand
luxuries.(26)
1001,9722.0193,840
4,3005,2110,3300,6496,967832313,69129 17538,5958S980144,753
175,845555,005
Textileand
leather.(16)
1002,6112,3255,789
6,2816,8058,5519,2239,626
11,00119,66132,18466,157
153,896266,622
320,6321,413,673
Minerals.
(18)
1002,7492,7805,178
5,525C,8108,5850,305
10,14112,16818,35542,64854,905
128,982 i219,395 j
262,212931,239
Miscella-neous.
(17)
1001,1011,7763,149
3,4924,2015,28S5,9616,4136,881
10,99321,60532,13472,038
134,177
177,752534,734
Industrial [finished
products.(21)
All com-modities.
(98)
100 ;1,4651,704 j3,347 I
1001,9652,1304,217
3,5Sl4 060i4 9725,9826 3117,292 !
10,001 !22,654 i35,025 '57,683 1
118,385 i
151,793 1476,564 I
4,5995,4206,70373847,8519,102
13,97829,11043,22394,492
166,495
205,417715,8S1
* Beginning of month—not always the 1st.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 77: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
212 FEDERAL RESERVE FEBRUARY, 1023.
GROUP INDEX NUMBERS-ITALY—RICCARDO BACHI.
Year and month.Vegetable
foods.
(25)
Animalfoods.
(13)
Chemicals.
(11)
Textiles.
(12)
Mineralsand metals.
(16)
Buildingmaterials.
(6)
Othervegetableproducts .
(5)
Sundries.
(12)
All com-modities.
* (100)
1920 average ,1922 average
1922.JanuaryOctoberNovemberDecember
100110
112113112110
100105
114114112110
10071
737271
10074
72858278
100
64
10083
92
100113
112124127129
10092
94969894
10090
92969693
GROUP INDEX NUMBERS—SWEDEN—Gi)TEBORGS HANDELS OCH SjOFARTSTIDNING.
[July 1,1913^Tune 30,1914—100.]
Year and month .
1913-141919192019211922 * . . . .
1921.December
1922.SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1923.January
Vege-tablefoods
(16)
100261262210161
156
146143132136
137
Animalfoods.
(7)
10040929G220164
186
179166171165
161
Raw ma-terials
for agri-culture.
(5)
100340312227168
202
160158159162
163
Coal.
(2)
100804
1,007285172
1&7
169169175178
184
Metals.
(5)
100258278159123
134
119117117117
117
Bui ldingmate-rials.
(7)
100286371243217
243
215216203209
211
Woodpulp.
(3)
100308675310163
154160178181
185
Hidesand
leather.
(5)
10021121510791
n o !I
90 ;9189
Textiles.
(5)
100
324144165
146
171176194198
205
Oils.
(2)
All com-modities.
(47)
100
294228160
179
150150150150
150
100330347211162
172
15S155154155
156
COMPARATIVE RETAIL PRICES IN PRINCIPAL COUNTRIES.In the following table are presented statistics showing the trend of retail prices and the
cost of living in the United States and certain other countries:
Year andmonth.
191419201921
1921.November. . . . .December
1922.JanuaryFebruary
AprilMay
JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
INDEX NUMBERS OF RETAIL
Retail prices.
UnitedStates.
"100199150
149147
139139136136136138139136137140142144
Can-ada.
a 100215164
149148
149143142138138137138141139138139140
Czecho-slo-
vakia.
*100
]
1,467i,m1,4141,4151,4441,475L,430L 2901,1051,016
984
France1
(Paris).
*100371337
326323
319307294304317307297289291290297305
Italy.
3 100454548
583585
576559546524530
522531
Swe-den.
3 100298237
211202
190189185182178179179181180178170168
PRICES AND COST OF LIVING.
Cost of living.
Austria(Vienna).
«1
533
669?70792875
1,0921,8712,6455,932
11,30610,3689,730
Bel-gium.
UOO
434
451447
418394372368365373372369
• 384406433429
Ger-many
(46J
cities).
51.09.1
12.0
1617
1822263235385070
114195400612
Ger-many(Ber-lin).
•1.010.812.4
1819
19222732354161
103164261565868
Po-land.
*100
28,622
47,62846,740
46,88348,08552,35858,62763,91468,40678,79890,823
107,663128,415170,987
Swit-zer-
land.
7 100
210
192189
186175170162156155159154154155
, 1 6 8
UnitedKing-dom.
*100249226
203199
192188186182181180184181179178180ISO
India(Bom-bay ) .
>100
173
182179
173. 165
165162163163165164165162160
NewZea-land.
•100
160158
157156153152152151150150150149
SouthAfrica.
MOO155133
127124
122120120123122121120120120121122
> Average for the month .* Average for 1913.
*July.* Apr. 15,1914-100.
* 1913-1914=1.• August, 1913-July, 1914-1.
*June.»1909-1913-100.
NOTE.—The Canadian index, computed by the Department of Labor, consists of the retail prices of 29 foods in 60cities. Descriptions of the index numbers for the other countries will be found in the FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETINfor January, 1923.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 78: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 213
INDEXES OF INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES.UNITED KINGDOM.
Year andmonth.
Monthly av:1913-. .-19201921
1921.November. -December.-
1922.JanuaryFebruary . . .MarchApril .May. .June . .Ju ly . .AugustSeptember..OctoberNovember. .December-.
PRODUCTION.
Coal.
Longtorn}23,953!19,108113,696
17,87522,594
17,69319,76419,921•22,87519,14615,82723,13519,151
• 25,68121,20721,712
|«25,841'
Pigiron.
Longtons}
8551670218
272275
288300390394408369399:412430482494534
Steelin-
gotsandcast-ings.
Longtons.* ]
639;7561302
444381
3281419|549404462400|473,528556565601546
Fin-ishedsteel.
Longtons*
646238
3301292
271|321369294|334,316|345338386493410
Rawcot-ton,
visible]sup-ply.3
EXPORTS.
Ironandsteel
manu-lac-
tures.
. LongBales}\ tons.1
414271142
1,3971,234
1,2161,271
1,2981,2401,1121,1811,1431,111
890864853882
1,0561,138
194205
253224290258272236252270279347372341
Cot-ton
manu-fac-
tures.
• 596'374!2441
Coal. Rawcotton.
Longions}6,1172,0782,055
366J 3,5941333! 4,309;
342! 4,021254! 4,0143071 5,201305! 4,097315 5,057315' 4,794447 5,064381i 6,146400, 7,0S3,357| 6,196402 5 671364 5,955
IMPORTS.
\
Lbs.*18115S|98
195166
1349983
1011201271118160
12S183205
Rawwool.
Lbs*
677363
6784
90|1111231117138
9779
107]52j
$
Rawwet
hides.
UidcsJdryand
salted.
Lbs}6,9274,02514,792|
8,9677,875
4,55712,184,4 5083,164'2,9942 7727,390'7,2817,3395,0905 5005,009
Lbs}
TRANSPORTATION.
VCS- jscls <
under: Vessotecon- cleared,
struc-tion. !
llritlsh 'railways.
Grantons} Tons}
Netton-
miles.
Ton-miles}
Totalfreight
re-ceipt!?.
Povndssterling.1
5,1S91 2,003: 5 , 6 5 2 . . . .0,277i 3,603! 3,049. 1,540]2,460 3,313 3,032 l,10S
4,5013,800] 2,640]
4,18612,8824,1023.590]2,4713,39329S24,4223,6166,57li5,4G9|6,20-1
2,236
1,920
1,617
1 I n thousands; 000 omit ted.* I n millions; 000,000 omitted.
8 Figures for end of the month .* Expressed in yards.
FRANCE.
3,9444,003!
3,9193,8914,8144,1875,1044 9754,82*5,8555,7315,5905,6535,145
,318,300
,320..3C31
,527,230,379,100,309,,455404
Unem-ployedamongapprox-imately12,000,.(XX) in-suredper-
sons.
Percent.
10,581
9,370,
11,1439,198
10,44281KW9,5019.W89,2049,922
15.7!10.2l
10.215.714.614.413.512.7|J2.312.012.012.0|12.4,12.2
N e tprofits
ofIndus-trialcom.
Ipanlcs-
Vetcent.
11.715.210.3
6.1
*7.*2
'b'i
s Figures for 5 weeks.
Year and month.
PRODUCTION.
Pig iron. Crudesteel.
Cottonstocks
atHavre.1 Total.
IMPORTS.
Total.
Raw Raw|cotton for silk forconsump- consump-l
tion. I tion.
Coal forconsump*
tion.
TRANSPORT A TION.
Vesselscleared.
Receiptsof
principalrailways.*
Unem-ployed
receivingmunicipal
1 Aid InParis.
Monthly average:1913.19201921
November.December-,
1921.
JanuaryFebruary . .March . . . . . .AprilM a y . .JuneJulyAugustSeptember.OctoberNovember.,December..
1922.
Metrictorn.1
* 4342S6280
295301
312323386383442410428447462503513
Metrictons.1
6 391254255
277302
315317367324364358369397407430410
Bales.1'*Metrictons}
274225169
19220S
1881631271331691451531359913115S197
1,8401,0711,333
1,5152,507
1,5541 5201,5701 7941,5381,7991,9361 7882 6162,0342,0342,429
Metrictons.1
3,6854 2113 165
5,1615,197
3,3964 1264 4343 787L396
307,223.512t 138J54345774,930
Metrictons.77,42819,57716,666
29, OSS30,835
14,87014,71420,97817,39118,09032,38026,32516,29117,30227,87720,337
Metrictons.
629390206
477382
50246740320740439156657955072252fi
Metrictons}
1.55S2,0051472
2,2442,895
1,6762,1532.0S11,53S2,0531 8291,6311 7671,6921,7631,965
Tons}2,1761,4121,802
1,8621,992
1,7351 7441,9342, OSS2,3402,4732,5232,3992,3592,3362,455
Francs}•165.892
479,894516,397
483,216 1641,887
454,323453,175472,779603 764472,607504,431651,720516,310720,210563,314532,152539,073
Kumbtr.
3,02220,671
3,7304,175
4,6584,3353,5462,4471,636
9536026064102722K5344
* In thousands; 000 omitted.! K a U w a y s S d W r o r s t a t e Railways, ParU-Lyon-MMiterrande, Nord, Orl&as, Q t , Midi, Alsace-Lorraine, and GuiUaum.Luxembour* Bale of 50 kilograms.' I S ^ S ^ L t n d GniUaume-Luxembourg Railways.
30425—23
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 79: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
214 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
GERMANY.
Year and month.
PRODUCTION.
Coaland
coke.Lignite
EXPORTS.2
Ironandiron
manu-factures
Ma-chinery
andelec-tricalsup-plies.
Dyesanddye-
stuffs.Coal.3
IMPORTS.
Raw-wool.
Halfmanu-
fac-turedsilk.
Cot-ton .4
Ironore.5
SHIPPING.
Arrivals ofvessels inHamburg.
UNEMPLOY-MENT.
Appli-cants
forevery
100avail-ableposi-tions.
Unem-ployedpersonsreceiv-ing
Stateaid.
Monthly average:19131920...1921
1921.NovemberDecember
1922:JanuaryFebruaryMarchApril . . .MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
Metrictons.1
17,00313,01313,664
14,05214,343
14,64013,65515,93113,80014,67011,41611,97212,78012,62313,32912,9S6
Metrictons.1
7,2669,303
10,241
10,47911,029
10,97810,09112,26010,63411,43710,48711,41112,14711,82312,08911,896
Metrictons.
541,439145,883203,681
233,204214,812
221,743172,709211,979200,677209,432213,220212,365198,408244,012246,074233,553
Metrictons.
Metrictons.
60,919 i 21,8124G,772 | 8,46239,037 8,530
35,69746,397
39,47045,05948,81346,11247,35449,34744,16250,97840,15050,69941,044
9,9539,212
9,5529,33212,29911,09512,62916,33512 67112,61613,47715,18711,110
Metrictons.
2, SSI, 12660S, 749518,937
569,657
Metrictons.16,608« 4,02511,860
12,628640,877 | 10,98-1
752,340669,433795,200795,940701,941528,766199,961121,359110,245125,670137,341
10,40026,20226,98824,09125,61915,72314,11911,0118,708
10,0239,198
Metrictons.
920»232
346388
347383440462486436435459342371425
Metrictons.
43,42412,49030,894
27,24228,313
23,42617l 91526,13024,07026,11222,03726,03520,91513.95910,58420,62?
Metrictons .*
1,225538619
937791
942493810866
1,5191,159
962997
1,0901,316
842
Number,1,256
401700
838503
745461894972
1,1431,092
7931,005
9451,016
877
Tons.1
1,182374794
881873
875716969
1,1121,2441,28710651 1711,2081,2721,046
Number,Num-ber.*
169165
136148
150145113113107103106109122129
366310
150149
16520321311665292015121624
1 In thousands; 000 omitted.> Export and import figures for first 4 months of 1921 not available; 1921 averages based on 8 months.» Not including coal for reparations account.* Includes linters.* Includes manganese ore.* Average based on 6 months.
SWEDEN.
Year and month.
PRODUCTION.
PigIron.
Iron andsteel ingots.
Unplanedboards.
Paperpulp. Coal.
TRANSPORTATION.
Vesselsentered. cleared.
Freightcarried
on Staterailways.
Unem-ployed
workmenper 100
vacancies.
Monthly average:1913.19201921
November.December..
1921.
January. . . .February. .MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember,OctoberNovember..
1922.
Metric tons.
013926
Metric tons:
493717
Cubicmeters,}
32830G162
361356
8725636699
500608539508494465
Metric tons.*717340
5499
104
2311362176SO89
104113144189
Metric tons.*408234122
192246
11462
197206230172214294229270302
Net tons.*1,147
677519
601575
4422S5617524600596625694684699705
Net tons*1,147
692
578582
409255509485633738787836808822751
Metric tons.1
830991589
721558
485630730622578645715765776799796
Number.
112107276
3S4473
482479381368257215203172155177
* In thousands; 000 omitted.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 80: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 215
CANADA.
Year and month.
PRODUCTION.
1921 average.
1921.JanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMay . .JuneJulyAugus t . . . . . .September...OctoberNovember...December-..
1922.JanuaryFebruary. . . .M a r c h . . . . . . .AprilM&yJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember..
Pig iron.
Tomi50
Coal.
Tons i1,255
1,3731,2151,143
933993
1,1071,1701,5191,3211,4081,5221,354
1,2081,3131.400
666721811858789
CrudeSteel.
Tons, i56
3342302217336359365351
Planksand
boards.
Pre-served
fish.
Feet*85
444667418588889397115351110
828811984156214215213191239205
11,007
8,5958,1307,5646,4246,083
10,6499,246
14,96715,61619,78015,2389,786
10,1807,1408,9295,0755,7116,7499,9367 607
20,67513,2399,995
Woodpulp.
Lbs. *87,871
43,51037,07758,92930,16376,01264.8S9A4.51592,109123,982118,343155,714169,204
124,01287,039
117,54362,)53
105,197168,169155,502169,611180,068154,019173,ISO
Wheat.
12,238
11,4469,1817,4804,98:18,1126,0033,6493,9727 145
21,13129,25434,492
6,1035,6026,0421,940
14,20711,7609,487
11,5879,233
55,316
Coal.
Tons A
1,525
1,9071,4541,787
9711,2141,5711 7221,7181,5531,4161,5281,401
1,0691,148J,S57
896548412427440GG3
1,4652,127
7,7747,9408,4275,8353,0734,2124,9037,4010,005
• 8,0449,972
12,377
11,0078,758
12,5387,2309,7888,4387.5188,4594,2764,383
11,284
Railroadreceipts.
j Dollars.»
2,288 33,508
3,0332,8203,4232,1792,4351,9082,2142,0941,7281,9211 7441,803
1,0401,5732,410l.arr1 9992,O0S1,5591,96.11,9181,9312,114
31,8082R,14431,88028,925Z), 13630,20933,0f>935,70039,08043,84140.20033,852
20,o:>320, aw31,90026,80930,79930,53632,02434,93739,15847,04144,259
1 In thousands; 000 omitted. * In millions; 000,000 omitted.
JAPAN.
"X ear and month.
Monthly average:1913 . .19201921
1921.OctoberNovemberDecember
1922.January. .* . .FebruaryMarch . /Apr i l . . .MayJune*. . .JulyAugus t . . . . .SeptemberOctober , . . .
PRODUCTION.1
Cottonyams.
Bales.126151151
159168178
168174\U191194192181179179193
Silkfabrics(habu-taye).
BikL*
""Hi"
145170
. 169
166129153110160173159116121118
Paper.
Pounds,
: : : ; : : : :44,538
45,96945,65846,781
46,48846,60549,64452,68753 97552,79153,73454,55353,32654,892
Rawsilk
stocks,Yoko-hamamar-ket.
Bales.
53,11158,477
53,53548,83244,766
40,56132,21344,70140,77718,29318,54745,84856,0324S,S1048,472
EXPORTS.
Silk,raw.
Piculs*16,85714,55721,836
24,00629,16937,250
16,92418,10216,04727,38035 14729,56934,54136 19635,95935,970
Silkfabrics(habu-tayc).
Piculs.2,3022,2641,702
1,2531,8551,857
1,0801,5512 0031,6691,9772,1761 7932,0171,0861,839
Cotton,yams.
Piculs.113,37474,83973,064
53,50653,4Si68,032
61,4H63,719
123,605138,226146,354139,05751,66040,07568,773
118,431
Sheet-ingsand
shirt-ings,gray.
Yards*7,921
28,46523,210
13,28916,70720,352
19,12421,99024,19424,72525,S2l29,71325,2S422,31317,60825,259
Rawcotton,ginned.
Piculs.15376*8718
6S5690640
1,1611,167l,0S4
707580490433731766330
IMPORTS
Wool.
Piculs.13,16240,91822/277
31,01314,03924,004
41,72493,41161, $6576,41624,75308,41537,43129,93617,55916,994
Ironplatesand
shoots.
PicuhA13252S312
218206371
4025046375S27o2890872697351332
TRANSPORTATION.*
Vesselscleared
inforeipntrade.
Tons.2,0752,2162,324
2,4912,6112,718
2,7492,8173,0942,9713,2S73,0242,9S73,1192,8192,784
Freightcarried
onStaterail-
ways.
Tons.2,0234,5484,342
4,6254,6104,922
4,1024,2615,0064,90S5,2254,9054,6414,4894,5024,920
Re-ceipts
ofSlaterail-
ways.
Yen.11,72327,58931,182
3-1,90031,72932,520
28,57628,03636,33742,0743H,4S632,18032,97733,94432,46135,374
1 In thousands; 000 omitted. * One hlki equals two pieces. i A picul varies from 133 to 140 pounds avoirdupois.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 81: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
216 FEDERAL, RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
FOREIGN TRADE OF PRINCIPAL COUNTRIES.
In the following tables are presented figures from official sources showing the monthly valueof the foreign trade of a group of European countries, Canada, Brazil, India, Japan, and theUnited States.
FOREIGN TRADE OF UNITED KINGDOM.
[In thousands of pounds sterling.]
Year and month.
Monthly average:191319201921
1921.December..
1922.JanuaryFebruaryMarchApril..MayJ unoJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
IMPORTS.
Food,drink,and
tobacco.
24,1M03.S1747,391
39, U5
33,97232,25745,26140,09743,07539,9363S,81737.76235,55538,01745.50142,292
Rawmate-
rials andarticlesmainly
unmanu-factured .
23.48559,19622,598
27,792
24,56520,22022,09521,40425,35825,24224}2.'t724,14121,8482li, 40930.22332,499
Articleswhdlly
ormainlymanu-
factured.
Miscel-laneous,includ-
ingparcelpost.
16,13137,78720,421
18,291
17,71016,57620.30918,96220,20718,857IS,;,79 i20,32« I19.244 I19,726 Ilfl.ft«719,S3S
259254268
165
2413222151991762031514322902022902S3
Total.
64,061161,38790.458
So, 364
76,48869,37587,87980,66188,81484,29881,78482,66176,94485,01595,60094,912
Food,drink,and
tobacco.
2,7164,2453,122
3,187
2,8612,7543,2703,0113,0453,0442,8063,1053,1543,0663,40$2,790
Rawmate-
rials andarticlesmainly
unmanufactured.
5.82512,1265,297
7,446
7,0326,8698,4657,3768,7577,6718,0418,90010,0999,21110,1019,493
Articleswholly
ormainlymanu-
factured.
34,28193,31249,055
47,364
51,82448,00051,76044,33645,07340,55648,45547,14948,36147,01051,96444,932
Miscel-laneous,includ-
ingparcelpost.
9491,5231,126
1,378
1,429712
1,085785
1,171875
1,117878S97
1,1121,0181,662
Total.
43,770111,20658,600
59,375
63,14758,33564,58155,50858.04552,14660,41960,03262,51160,39966,49158,8*3
Reex-ports.
9,13118,5638,921
9,20*
8,45910,17410,1549,2008,9658,7208,3177,5046,3818,2779,1488,479
Totalexports
andreex-ports.
52,901129,76967,521
G8,579
71,(>0668,50974.73564,70867,01060,86668,73667,53668,89368,67675,63967,362
FOREIGN TRADE OF FRANCES
Year and month.
IMPORTS.
In thousands of francs.
Food.Raw
mate-rials.
412,1442,096,3791,033,170
1,850,148
887,2531,137,8551,005,463
983,000996,000
1,082,3711,200,7641,096,9031.0S7.0001,190,0001,478,0001,904,000
Manufac-tured
articlos.
138,1691,072,787
412,045
543,445
247,827324,150465,737323,000310,000285,448318,109352,229333,000349.000353;ooo390,000
Total.
-j thou-sands of; metrici tons.
In thousands of francs.
Food.Raw
mate-rials.
Manufac-tured
articles.Parcelpost. Total.
Inthou-
sands ofmetrictons.
Monthly average:191319201921...
December.1921.J
JanuaryFebruary..March ,AprilMayJune*JulyAugustSeptember.October...November.December..
1922.'
151,465989,576517,15S
754,671
352.572385,021460,765438,000504,000483,356476,813510,597473,000570,000517.000629,000
701,7784,158,7411,962,373
3,6354,2113,165
3,154,264 I 5,197
1,487,6521,847,0261,931,965l,743,G401,810,1251,851,1841,995,7461,959,7291,893,0002,109,0002,348,0002,923,000
3,3964,1264,4343,7874,3964,3074,2234,5124,1384,5434,5774,930
69,908217,733161,031
259,605
121,526153,892130,595136,000132,000
154,841509,485463,219
549,495
458,460443,455456,930461,000498,000
301,4211,413,5481,067,413
1,193; 161
994,8521,106,5071,189,7121,231,0001,127,000
47,182100,479104,430
180,059
63,903144,45399,431134,000111,000
573,3512,241,2451,796,092
2,182,320
1,638,7411,853,3121,876,6681,962,9971,880,064
113,435179,407141,000195,000196,000249,000
371,959408,005477,000494,000537,0001,186,000
885,029931,066
1,055,0001,099,000856,000
1,120,000
59,619157,83668,000149,000117,000224,000
1,433,0421,676,0001,741,0001,937,0001,706,0003,079,000
1,8401,0711,333
2,507
1,5541,5201,5701,7941 5381,7991,9361,7882,6162,0342,0?,42,429
1 Not including reexport trade.3 Calculated ou 1919 value units.
3 Imports calculated on basis of actual declared value.* Value of exports not available. Beginning with June, exports calculated on 1921 value units.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 82: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 192P>. FEDERAL BESEItVE BULLETIN. 217
FOREIGN TRADE OF DENMARK, NETHERLANDS, SWEDEN
Year and month.
Monthly average:191319201921
1921.OctoberNovemberDecember
1922.JanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
Denmark.(In millions of
kroner.)
Im-ports.
712-1213G
143143155
10270
10312615914011713413414S
Ex-ports.
fiO151121
113102107
8076
10076
10S125101
121112
Netherlands.(In millions of
guilders.)
Im-ports.
278187
17917GISO
152
180167194151J641791051S7172163
Ex-ports.
142114
11510797
86S4
11393
108101105
116112104100
Sweden.(In millions of
kronor.)
Im-ports.
; 71i 2MI JOG
| 101! 95; 112
7749
1091029793
* 83105109118111
no
Ex-ports.
OS19191
9910310S
61' 38
71GO90
101113132123122 I12S |120
. CANADA, IIIIAZH., INDIA, AND JAPAN.
Canada.(In millions of
dollars.)
Im-ports.
50
ire.*
6061
ou5151794SGO62Gl67on0770
Ex-ports.
31107101
81
ss :
474761337073727473
104132
I™" " ~Brazil.
(In millions ofinllrds.)
Im-ports.
1 si171141
11290
113
9210113112712712V)
1401,13220170
Ex-ports,
S2HO142
100
175
ICi1721S7111 I110
1^2202 j
_2iiS j
India.(In millions of
rupees.)
Im-| ports.
134
235201232
2701S9215
191
1K22121S2 |2.15200
i
Ex-ports.
205272214
1*2 :
J'J'J218
210222 :'111
273192214252an;1*2 \2M
! Japan,i (In millions of
yen.)
Im-port?.
m135
130152101
179I'.IS20S
1WI157142137I.Ti105110143
Ex-ports.
53102104
112121140
H7101115129lr>4J40144140150101139158
1 Italian yearly figures for 1921 based on average for six months only.8 Dutch figures for 1913 not comparable with later figures.
FOREIGN TRADE OF UNITED STATES.
[In thousands of dollars.]
Year and month
Monthly average:191319201921
1921.December....
1022,JanuaryFebruary..March. /April...May. . .June . . .Ju ly . . . . . .AugustSeptember8
October 5. . .November*December...
Gold. Silver.
Merchandise.
Crudemate-rialsfor
use inmanu-factur-ing.
I Food-stalls
incrudecondi-tionandfoodani-mals.
I
5.3091 2,9891 50,414 18,39934,756 ! 7 33* 145.995 48,13657,606 5,270 71,090 25,331
31,685 5,510
6,4964,7716,953
94,016
82,63926,5712S,701j33,488112,244 j 4', 800 ,8 904 5,512 88, OSS
12 9691 0,346 "42,987| 6.05719,092,24,464;20,80fi,IS,30S26,440'
80,97180,910G'J,80188, OSS9 1 , HO87,29ft
4,944 110,2856,370! 80,8183,940137,378r>,855|7,84S
32,707
27,49S22,37028,75025,71131,20426,17027,59t>22,489IS,70937,465
Food-stuffspartly
orwhollymanu-
fac-tured.
Manu-fac-
turesfor
furtheruse inmanu-factur-ing.
10,52903,17830,737
136103,178 66,87128,35466,87128,669
25,473
25,90027,762!30,014|32,48234,78537,34638,51142,404124,023)30,324
32,083
30,27234,04142,82037,25239,39846,47148,398;48,430,41,020!65,685!
Manu-!fac- !
tures ! Totalready
for
sump-tion.
mer-chan-dise.^
34,453 149,38373.060J 439,87351,577 209,085
51,171
49,81149,375
50*82u|58,254-58,43l<!49,464j55, H5S!54,03*171,452;
237,373
217,195215,743250,17S217,073252,817260,391252,1282*1,412228,795315,0S3
Gold.
7,65020,841
1,991
2,1G2
8031,732
9(i31,57'j:3,407l,C0l!
645!950
l,399i17,5923,431:2,710,
Silver.
Merchandise.
Food-Crude sttills Food*mate* in stuITsrials ! crude I partlyfor Icondt- or
use in j tioumanu- andfactur
5,231 64,0729,40* 155,8974,2'JS S2,002
7,145
3,9777,0924.302!5 , ICh* I5,677;6,OOi:6,28'J3,8013,735:
3,2Gl?!fif/J0
89,950
whollyinami*
fac-foodani- 1 tared.mals. I
Miuiu*fac-
turesfor
furtheriiho i nmanu-factur-
ing.
Manu-fac- ituns \ready !
for !con-
sump- '!
lion. '
Totalmer-
chan-dise.*
14,132' 27,OVJ 33,077 64,WS 207,00270,4W*i 93,050 Ty.875l 207.071 i"^5,60S57,0SH 55,809 33.323 135.450 373,760
2S,73i
72.S3.sj 31,05155,1*95!
3S,2S2 35,14T
76,WV70,511!64,441:70/219;00,02447,S72:00,019;
133,703;i»4;W9
3l,5*)731,17434,14341,000;41.95S!61,339;55,142|40,7(JV
: 2^7G4[
43,01'J4f
47*372150,370'
i(j)22ti40,071!43,231!47,91951,47149,ti20
35,1433L\ i'SA43,032
40,4f73y,035,ti7o35,TON35,50632,9433:i5'j:i|
98,370 290,306
91, M0S4,OS4
112.7t>5'113,S70|112,112
100,5441 0 1 , N 7 1106,5421110,1771
0 5 «35,8^9; 113,937
278,893250,748330,2t>731^100307 6S9334,684301,313301,s04313,092370,7203sO,O52344,425
1 Including miscellaneous merchandise imported.1 Including miscellaneous and foreign merchandise exported.'Imports under old tariff law September 1-21,1922, only,< Import figures delayed owing to change in tariff.
5 Imports for Sept. 21-Oct. 31.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 83: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
218 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEHRUARY, 1923.
FOREIGN TRADE INDEX,
There are presented below the Federal Re-servo Board's series of index numbers designedto reflect relative quantity movements in theforeign trade of the United States. Changesin the level of prices have been allowed for bymultiplying the quantities of selected com-modities exported or imported each month byfixed 1913 prices.1
Exports.
! Rawinate-
' rials
! coin-j modi-
ties).
1913, year.1919, year.1920, year.1921, year.1922, year.
1921,January...February.MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober...NovemberDecember.
1922.January...February.MarchAprilMayJune ,July ,AugustSeptember.October....November.December..
100.088.992.2
103.1
103.291.078.276.597.6
107.9111.6142.7115.7121.795.193.8
82.668.589. S90.578.380.379.188.891.2
122.9112.686.7
Pro- Con-due- ! sum-ers'
goods(10
com-modi-ties).
ers'goods
com-modi-ties).
100.0155.1158.7116.9
208.61G2.4135.1132.596.494.278.099.689.7
107.0100.296.0
104.386.0
121.7120.9128.81213124.090.098.996.8
101.6109.9
100.0183.6133.6121.1
126.2110.4120.2116.4110.8132.2133.8160.7142.3113.2106.2107.8
129.7127.6156.5150.5155.4169.2133.5126.3111.5121.0117.2122.8
Total(29
com-modi-ties).
100.0115.310T.5108.9
120.2104.192.790.5
100.3111.5112.9142.1118.6118.498.196.9
94.582.6
100.9106.099.4
107.495.090.796.2
119.8112.495.5
Imports."
Rawmate-rials(10
com-modi-ties).
100.0157.5135.8113.6
74.5118.2160.6153.398.794.599.3
116.8102.896.1
115.1133.0
118.4123.3148.1125.5144.6148.7146.9174.2138.5
roduc-ers'
goods(12
com-modi-ties).
100.0192.9227.5162.8
130.9143.7177.2177.6150.0152.3126.6165.1137.7173.5109.4219.1
228.7281.3306.8236.1227.9273.32G6.3255.5182.7
Con-sum-ers'
goods(5
com-modi-ties).
100.0147.5138.9141.4
123.9135.4178.9185.1162.1130.4121.4129.899.3
116.5149.2164.8
135.2133.5161.1152.0168.0137.3137.5120.390.6
Total(27
com-modi-ties).
100.0168.4168.8135.6
102.6130.1169.5167.1127.2120.8112.6136.0114.6126.9150.6168.7
160.1183.4206.5169.1177.9191.01S7.7194.2148.6
The December figure of 96.5 shows a decreaseof 15.9 points, or over 13 per cent, from theNovember figure for volume of exports. Thelevel is thus back to that of late summer. Thedecrease took place in raw materials, which fell26 points, while producers' and consumers'goods showed increases. The change in rawmaterials was occasioned by a falling off in theexports of grains; oats 87 per cent, barley 51per cent, and corn 36 per cent. Crude oil was
t l The list includes 27 of the most Important imports the value of whichin 1913 formed 49.3 per cent of the total import values, and 29 of the mostimportant exports the value of which in 1913 formed 56.3 per cent of thetotal export val ues. The classification of the original list o7 commoditiesused was given in the July, 1920, BULLETIN. The classification of 11additional commodities of imports was given in the April, 1921, BULLE-TIN, and 2 additional commodities in the November, 1921. BULLETIN.Exports of gasoline have been altered to include naphtha.
the only raw material to increase in exportvolume. An increase in the amount of acetateof lime and sole leather exported caused therise in producers' goods, and consumers' goodswas affected by the rise in lard exports.
From a comparison of the yearly figures, itis evident that exports in 1922 did not averageso large in volume as in the preceding threeyears. Raw materials fell 13 per cent below1921 and producers' goods 7 per cent below.There was an increase, however, in the volumeof consumers' goods exported in 1922.
SAVINGS DEPOSITS,
During December the volume of savings de-posits increased in all Federal reserve districts,and for the entire country the increase was 3per cent as compared with the preceding monthand 7.6 per cent over January 1, 1922. Theincreases were due in part to the transferring ofChristmas club funds to savings accounts andto the increasing of individual accounts throughthe crediting of proceeds received from the re-demption of maturing Government securities.
Comparison of savings deposits on January1, 1923, with deposits on December 1, 1922,and January 1, 1922, are shown for 880 banksdistributed throughout all sections of theUnited States. The figures for the Boston andNew York districts are those of large mutualsavings banks, but in all other districts reportsof other banks are included to make the figuresthoroughly representative. In all - districtswhere reporting commercial banks subdividetheir-time deposits, statistics of savings depositssubject to notice (excluding time certificates ofdeposit) are used. This is in accordance withthe definition given in the board's RegulationD ; series of 1920.
SAVINGS D E P O S I T S .
[000 omitted.]
District.
No. 1—BostonNo. 2—New YorkNo. 3—Philadelphia....No. 4—ClevelandNo. 5—RichmondNo. 6—AtlantaNo. 7—ChicagoNo. 8—St. LouisNo. 9—MinneapolisNo. 10—Kansas CityNo. 11—DallasNo. 12—San Francisco..
Total
Numberof banks.
643080189381
2193515.58
11275
880
Jan. 1,1923.
1,130,9981,807,550
435,122407,761278,891173,355828,579124,19783,79394,31186,686
831,018
6,283,261
Dec. 1,1922.
1,116,5461,746,127
419,046393,214276,936168,426805,640120,58981,24691,98586,173
796,128
6,102,056
Jan. 1,1922.
1,069,1061,704,986
420,123378,702250,878154,318779,265109,16577,23984,13976,222
733,220
5,837,363
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 84: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
FEBRUARY 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 219
REPORT OP ASSOCIATED KNIT UNDER-WEAR MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA.
Production of winter and summer underwearby months since December, 1921, is given in thefollowing table:
Year andmonth.
1921.December..
1922.January... -February..MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember.OctoberNovember.December-,
Number of mills.
Total.
49
Win-ter.
37
Sum
30
Production (in dozens).
Totat.
519,231
612,490063,316756.247522,03551S,150564,893422, S72519,511513,572524,4SG599,891461,695
Winter.
235,617
293,510332,224392,595275,91129S, 080345,605269,223311,713318,220283,242321,944233,459
Slimmer.
2*3,611
34S, 0S0331,122333,052240,124220,070219,2NS153,649177,798195,332241,214277,94722S,236
Order and production report for the monthending December 31, 1922, follows:
[Number of reporting mills, 42. In dozens.]
Unfilled orders first of month... .1; 286, 510New orders received during
month 761,233
Total (A) 2f 047, 743Shipments during the month 363,481Cancellations during month 5,311
Total (B) 368,792
Balance orders on hand January 1 (A-B) . 1,678,951
Thirty-seven representative mills which re-ported for November and December, 1922,furnished the data for the following table:
{In dozens.]
Unfilled orders (end ofmonth)
New ordersShipmentsCancellationsProduction
November. December. Loss. Gain*.
1,014,665712 636412,10814,860
473,034
1,282.832740,833339,244
5,311355,126
72,8649,549
117 908
26S,16728,197
INDEX OF OCEAN FREIGHT RATES.The accompanying table shows the monthly
fluctuations in'ocean freight rates prevailingbetween United States Atlantic ports and theprincipal European trade regions. The figuresare derived from the actual rates quoted onthe following commodities: Grain, provisions,cotton, cottonseed oil, and sack flour. Rates
in January, 1920, havo been used as a base.For the methods used in constructing theindex see the August, 1921, BULLETIN, pages931 934.
RELATIVE OCKAX FREIGHT KATKS IN UNITED STATES ANDK TRADE.
United States Atlantic ports to—
Month.
January, l'.*:o.January, 11)21.
1D22.January.FebruaryMarch. "April..May...June. .July...August...SeptemberOctober...November.December.
1923.January...
I Xcther-Frcnrti | lands
nnd
100.0 ! 100.0CO. 7 30. 2
27. T) <
27.o ;2o.32X027.1
25.3 !
M. I
Zi. I21.12:j. 923.425.6
24.7
Soamli-I1.1VJU.
Medi-terra-nean.
ffK). 0
;.:i !
100.0 !42.9 i 'J.I 2
2,1.4 32.2
21.«22.722. S !2:u> !22. «i j20.7 )i9.i !ls-u;21.3
19. 8
2.5. 121.0Z\. \2!1. 12.J.022. i22. (>22. U22.9'22.7
22.3 I
30.127.127. \27. t2ft. 121.022.221.021.321.8
21.2
AllEurope.
100.0
27.12'J. 12<s ;{2:.! \
21.62:1.422.721.021.4
22.0
COMMERCIAL FAILURES REPORTED.
FAILURES DURING DECEMBER.
District.
FirstSecondThird ,FourthFifthSixthSeventh. . . .EighthNinthTenthEleventh. . .Twelf th . . . .
Total
Number. Liabilities.
1922
MS40773
117IOS100257819iC3
129225
1921
190551124ISO212100302142100100197150
2,444
1922
51,010,8709(87l»,K294,2<J7,2SQ3,519,317
11,236,2021,570,3589 0 7 5 W 2
807,4911,224,1521,55S, 1302,118,0075,101,812
1921
$ , 7 , 1 93fi, 079,320
4,170,3774, aw, 4905,679,4 S70t0fA4017,830,3133,873,5102,158,5152,152, m4,307,2513,507,4.53
52,069,021 87,W2,3S2
FAILURES DUKINO YEAR.
Number. Liabilities.
District.1922 1921 ! 1922
First. . . . . : 1,9.50Second 4,263Third | 1,000Fourth 1.0S1
1,8472,1593,15")1,49G1,021
9£i
Fifth,Sixth...Seventh.Eighth..Ninth. . .TenthEleventh l,40STwelfth 2,201
Total, United States. . . 23,676
1921
1,5813,614
9411,6031,5151,9142,4331, 2f)0
723883
1,4911,699
:S4It314,SSTi1172,017,462i 31,311,905i 52,901,306 !
I 46,617,428! 41,320,948! 95,231,154
27,821,25120,179,98519t 686,21133,242,89635,300,819
*39,314,G30195159&O0, , & O 031,335,43753,675,49234,3*0,33543,477,70468,904,59448,742,07415,499,07S27,347,62434,414,77635,149,739
19,652 j'317,896,251 627,401,883
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 85: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
220 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
PRODUCTION AND SHIPMENTS OF FINISHED COTTON FABRICS.1
Total finished yards billedduring the month:
District l23
68
Total
Total average per cent of ca-pacity operated:
Districtl23568
Average for all districts
Total gray yardage of finish-ing orders received:
District l2356
Total
Number of cases of finishedgoods shipped to customers:
District l2356
Tota l . . . . : . . ;
Number of cases of finishedgoods held in storage at endof month:
Distr ict l23568
Total
Total average work ahead atend of month (expressed indays):
District l23568
Average for all districts.
November, 1922.
White goods.
14,758,9406,554,2488,977,8579,103,398
512,534
^39,906,977
656S
1218939
78
13,339,9495,966,758
10,535,0277,974,982
37,816,716
5,8714j 4115,6232,003
17,908
4,9825,020
694
10,696
3.49.9
17.0. 8.9
0.0
7.7
Dyed goods.
26,833,1931,520,4207 855,607
88,065
36,297,285
926394
SS
29,678,5915,510,8288,512,164
195,484
43,897,067
8,819412
3,040
12,271
5,000481405
5,8S6• • -
18.07.5
21.0
17.0
Printedgoods.
.9,618,7013,808,807
13,427,508
5259
54
11,633,6675,005,189
16,638,856
2,647
2,647
2,061
•2,061
21.011.0
19.0
Total.
54,441,29619,253,73316,833,4649,191,463
512,5342,665,253
102,897,743
7174
1078939
105
78
58,289,24222,239,28319,047,1918,170,466
2,465,306
110,211,488
29,55511,9158,5634,328
425
54,786
22,21614,6147,969
951
219
45,969
13.011.019.08.90.08.2
13.0
December, 1922.
White goods.
13,046,0396,958,7049,966,9757,812,100
188,260
37,972,078
5269
1286314
68
10,941,36651789,7109.932,1956,959,108
33,622,379
5,3494,6026,8521,590
18,393
4,9704,293
482
9,745
3.07.0
13.06.70.0
6.0
Dyed goods.
28,881,2122,628,9878,944,720
60,053
40,514,972
8959
102
87
25,086,9185,222,0527,903,381
134,658
38,347,009
8,199735
3,643
12,577
5,191676401
6,268
14.56.5
18.0
14.0
Printedgoods.
10,623,0113,015,175
13,638,186
5453
54
8,957,3644,227,235
13,184,599
2,223
2,223
2,549
2,549
20.06.0
17.3
Total.
57,085,71520,594,29818,911,6957,872,153
188,2602,064,235
106,716,356
GS72
115631487
74
50,740,41319,309,90717,835,5767,093,766
i,578,i84
96,557,846
28,03412,74710,4953,996
492
55,764
23,21913 4737,5051,441
208
45,846
12.09.0
15.46.70.04.2
11.0
the i1nS l«t?5 t l (Th1 A s s o £ a t i o . n , o f Finishers of Cotton Fabrics at the request of the Federal Reserve Board have arranged for a monthly survey withinconcenmiir the tah"*tS)xr ^ q t u n e s are herewith presented in tabular form. The secretary of the asscciaticn makes the following statement
g figures are compiled from statistics furnished by 32 out of 57 member firms of this association. I t is probably fair to statehaving specific detail at hand, but according to our best estimate it is probably well within the fact that the figures given forwort: would cover, approximately, the following percentages of the entire industry: White goods, 70 per cent; dyed goods,
per cent. The figures given represent reports from exactly the same finishers for the two menths, both for the totals, therefore, are strictly comparable.
t h e i f t o t f i ^ f v ^ h ^ f r ^l™ U ? a b l e £° g i v 5 S * 8 ! 1 3 , / ? ^ t h e r esP«*i™ headings of white goods, dyed goods, and printed goods, and reportedtheir totals only, therefore the column headed " T o t a l " does not always represent the total of the subdivisions, but is a correct total for the district.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 86: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 221
PHYSICAL VOLUME OP TRADE.
Complete monthly statistics of commoditymovements for the year 1922, together withyearly totals since 1919, are published in thisissue of the BULLETIN. A total of 289 seriesof statistics, divided into general commoditygroups, are listed in the tables below.1 Thesedata cover the field of agricultural movements,mining, manufacturing, fisheries, and trans-portation. In the manufacturing group itwill be noted that not only are statistics ofproduction given, but also of shipments andstocks of many commodities, and, in a few
1 CLASSIFICATION OF PHYSICAL VOLUME OF TRADESTATISTICS.
(2S9 Series.)
1. GRAIN AND FLOUR (40 series):Receipts, shipments, and stocks; visible supply; wheat flour pro-
duction.2. LIVE STOCK (22 series):
Receipts and shipments, animals slaughtered, and cold storageholdings of meats.
3. DAIRY PRODUCTS (6 series):Receipts and cold storage holdings.
4. OTHER AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS (26 series):(a) Cotton seed received, crushed and on hand; cottonseed-oil
production and stocks. t(5) Oleomargarine consumption.(c) Tobacco—sales at loose-leaf warehouses; sales of revenue
stamps on manufactured products.(d) Shipments of certain fruits.(e) Shipments of certain vegetables.(/) Sugar—receipts, meltings, and stocks.
5. FISHERY PRODUCTS (2 series):Fish landed and cold-storage holdings.
6. FOREST PRODUCTS (12 series):(a) Lumberproduction'andshipments.(b) Naval stores—receipts and stocks.
7. FUEL AND POWER (21 series):(a) Coal and coke—production of 4 products and shipments of
anthracite.(6) Petroleum: Crude petroleum—production and stocks and new
wells completed; refined products—production and stocks,(c) Electric power produced.
8. METALS (11 series):(a) Iron and steel—production, unfilled orders, shipments, and
sale| of various products.(b) Nonferrous metals—production of 5 metals and stocks of zinc.
9- TEXTILES (22 series):(a) Cotton—sight receipts, spinners' takings, stocks at mills, mill
consumption, and active spindles.(6) Wool—mill consumption and active machinery.(c) Silk—imports, mill consumption, and stocks.
10. HIDES AND LEATHER (19 series):(a) Hides and skinsT-sales and stocks.(b) Leather production.(c) Boots and shoes, production.
IK BUILDING MATERIALS (36 series):(a) Brick—production, shipments, stocks and orders.(b) Cement—production, shipments, and stocks.(c) Oak and maple flooring—production, shipments, stocks,
orders booked, and unfilled orders.(d) Enameled sanitary ware—shipments, stocks, and orders
received.12. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURES (40 series):
(a) Paper and wood pulp—production, consumption, ship-ments, and stocks of wood pulp; production and stocks ofcertain grades of paper. •
(fi) Rubber and tires and tubes—Imports and consumption of' *>er; production, stocks,andshipments of tires and tubes.
LObifes—production and shipments.' ! — i-+;~«o chinnnmts. and unfilled orders.
rubber;(c) Automobiles—production ana smpmems.(d) Locomotives—completions, shipments, and unfilled(0 Vessels built in United States.
13. TRANSPORTATION (32 series):(a) Railroad operating statistics.(b) Railway car loadings, by commodities am(c) Surplus and shortage of freight cars, and ](d) Vessels cleared in foreign trade.(0 Canal traffic—Panama Canal; Sault Ste. Marie.
id districts.id bad-order cars.
instances, of now orders booked and unfilledorders on hand.
Indexes of production and movement ofgoods, computed by the use of certain series,selected from those given in the followingpages, are plotted on the accompanying chart.These three indexes, representing respectivelythe monthly movements of agricultural com-modities, the output of mineral products, andthe production of manufactured goods, showthe outstanding characteristics of businesstrends since 1919. An analysis of the fluctu-ations of these indexes and of the importantindividual series included is made in thefollowing paragraphs.
The year 1922 began with a temporary haltin business activity, following an encouragingupward trend during the fall months of 1921.An increase in the volume of business evi-denced in March was checked by the coal strikein April, but the upward movement was re-sumed in May. This improvement likewisebecame retarded during the summer by thecombined effects of the coal and railway shop-men^ strikes. After the settlement of theselabor disturbances in September, recovery wasrapid, and many new high records in the volumeof business were reached during the last threemonths of 1922. The large production ofagricultural commodities during the year wasreflected in the record-breaking movement ofcrops to market. This movement, togetherwith coal shipments, placed a strain upon thethe railroad system, already weakened by theshopmen's strike, and the car shortage be-came acute. Nevertheless car loadings werenearly the largest on record. The year endedwith a slight check in manufacturing activityduring December and with mineral outputgreater than at any time since the high pointreached in October, 1920.
Agricultural movements fell in April to thelowest point reached in the four years coveredby the index, but in August a sharp upwardtrend became evident and the index rose inOctober to the highest point on record. Re-ceipts and shipments oi live stock exceededthose of a somewhat similar period in thefall of 1919, but for the year they were smaller.Movements of grain and cotton, althoughthey did not attain in any one month to theirhigh records of 1919, were spread out over alonger period and reached larger totals. Cot-ton receipts, however, fell below figures for
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 87: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
222 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
1921. The index for leaf tobacco sales wasabnormally small throughout 1922, owing tothe fact that records of monthly sales at co-operative associations, ^yhich were of con-siderable importance during that year, werenot available.
Indexes of mineral production during theyear reflected the combined effects of the coalstrikes, the high rate of building activity, andthe enormous production of automobiles. Theoutput of coal was large during the first threemonths, as operators were attempting toaccumulate a surplus in preparation for theimpending strikes. At the same time pig ironand nonferrous metals were steadily recoveringfrom the extremely low point to which theyfell in 1921. The drastic decline in the mineralindex in April and the low levels at which itmoved until August were due entirely to thecoal strikes, as the output of most of the otherproducts were rising. Pig-iron productionwas substantially curtailed in August, owin^to the deterrent influences of the coal andrailway strikes. After the settlement of these
strikes, the composite mineral index rose from67.5 in August to 124.5 in December. TheDecember figure was the largest in the post-war period with the exception of that ofOctober, 1920. The production of bituminouscoal was so large in the first three and last fourmonths of 1922 that the yearly total nearlyequaled that of 1921. The output of anthra-cite, however, has not been so low since 1902and was less than 60 per cent of the 1921 pro-duction. The volume of pig iron produced inDecember was the largest since October, 1920,and the total production for 1922 was over 60per cent above that of the preceding year.Crude petroleum output showed a strong up-ward trend throughout the year and broke allprevious records. The consumption of petro-leum was large, but did not keep pace with thetotal of production and imports, and the yearended with enormous stocks on hand. Theproduction of copper was well below that of.1919 and 1920, but was more than double the1921 figure. Zinc output was nearly 75 percent greater than in 1921.
PERCENT
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
INDEX NUMBERS OF DOMESTIC BUSINESS1919 - 1922
J
J•fL(*
\\\
\!\!i
?\v •/
V
J V/
//
r VI••\
•**••••«••••••••••j
\v A,7
V
IGRICULTURE1IN1NGMANUFACTURE
/
V
\
\
\
/ ,
nV"\
K
¥
h
114
V77/ 1
\
CENT
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30 "
20
10
J. F. M. A. M. J. J. A. S. 0. N. D. J. F. M. A. M. J. J. A. S. 0. N. D. J. F. M. A. M. J. J. A. S. 0. N. D. J. F. M. A. M. J. J. A. S. 0. N. D.
1919 1920 1921 1922
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 88: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
FEBRUARY, FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 223
Manufacturing during 1922 continued therecovery begun in the preceding year. Aretardation of the upward movement waseffected by the strikes in the spring and a^ainin the summer, but activity increased rapidlyafter the settlement of tlie strikes, and themanufacturing index in November reached109.4. This figure has been exceeded onlytwice in the last four years—by 110 in Janu-ary, 1920, and by 110.4 in March of the sameyear. The downward movement evidencedin manufacturing activity during Decemberwas largely seasonal. Steel ingot outputin November reached the highest point sinceOctober, 1920. Lumber production reflectedthe great building activity ' and was main-tained at high levels throughout the year,and the output was the largest since 1918.Shipments of lumber in December attainedthe highest point since August, 1918. Thoproduction and consumption of cement in1922 were the largest on record. Textile millsoperated during the fall months at around 90per cent of capacity, and the index for thisgroup of industries' reached a high point inNovember. In that month mills consumedmore cotton than in any month since January,1920; wool consumption was the largest onrecord; and deliveries of silk to manufacturerswere only slightly less than in October, 1922,the record month. The yearly total of cottonconsumption exceeded that of all years since1918. The output of petroleum productsmoved rapidly upward during the year to newhigh records. Food products were manufac-tured at a fairly steady rate during the year,and although below the 1919 levels, the pro-duction of these commodities exceeded thefigures for 1920 and 1921. Sugar meltings byAmerican refiners broke all previous records.Sole leather production was low throughoutthe year, ranging between 70 and 88 per centof the average output in 1919. Wood pulpand paper production remained fairly steadyduring the year at a level higher than in 1919and 1921, but lower than in 1920. The out-put of tobacco products, owing to the increasein production of cigarettes, exceeded all pre-vious records.
IXDKXKS OF DOMESTIC HUHINKSH.
[Monthly average of 1919- lOO.jAGRICULTURAL MOVEMENTS.
Date.Total Total
agricui- ani-lure.* mals.
1922.'JanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
SS.977.770.7.'>7.482.07.*). I7i). S
10G.712S.S151.2137.9121.3
91. S7(i. A79.27J.S90.28S.781.2%. 5
106.0132.0122.2101.0
Totalgrains.
83.892.373.04S».G
92.577.1
100.4153. Smo);«. 7118.2128. :>
Cotton.
70.843.342.837.0M). 143.033.44N.3
139.5227. S201.1139.2
Fruit.
90.155. 5
130.4103.0JO:>.793.859.343.138.040.049.0
100.1
to-bacco.
113.2101.227. 55.53.91.5
12.355.2Sfl.7
144.7on. 397.3
1 Combination of 14 iudeptuitlent series.
MINERAL PRODUCTS.
Date.
1922.January.. . .February..MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember.OctoberNovember..December..
Totalmin-eral
prod-ucts.»
91.39.5.4
117.559.5G7.970. Gas. 467.599.9
118.5120.1121.5
Bi-tumi-nouscoal.
98.5107.3131.541.353.158.444.558.3
107.3118.3118.6121,7
An-thra-citecoal.
85.192.0
119.1.3.6
1.11.62.2
67.7116.1Ui.i114.7
Cruilepetro-leum.
137.1129.7149.1141.9147.7143.814S.0147.1143.8150.1152.1159.3
Iron.
64.363.979.981.390.592.694.271.179.8
303.511L8121.1
Cop-per.
24.134.858.071.783.789.085.093.989.896.79-1. S90.7
Zinc.
60.357.367.565.609.872.681.279.9£1.3
101.0102.3109.0
101.093.493.0SS.889.089.184,496.705.3
ion. :;t i l . 6100.0
i Combination of 7 independent series.
PRODUCTION OF MANUFACTURED GOODS.
Date.
1922.JanuaryFebruary...MarchApril....MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember..OctoberNovember..December..
Totalman-ufac-ture.1
Steel.
87.0SO. 290.984.798.199.195.3104.6100.3107.5109.4
Lum-ber.
63.469.394.397.0
107.8104.898.98S.194.4
114.118.9110.5
100.795.4
102.598.1
121.1104.4104.3116.2101.5115.112.9103.
Pa-per.
Petro-1 Tex- Loath- F _nr1 To-
95.090.0
10S.499.9
112.110.699.9
110.107.8112.8113.4106.8
119.0108.6123.9124.4132.2133. S146.2141.2139.1147.2149.7
11.2296.81
107.6!91.3
10S.9I107.195.0
115.7110.71120.0|125.0113.3
SS.2! 01.378.11 8S.578.5! 06.570.7i SI. 970.4 96. S72.41 9S.972.180.4
97.5104.5
79.5: 97.,82.71 106.779.11 114.076.0] 106.1
90.683.8OS. 489.6
10S.1119.8114.8134.1121.0115.0112.489,4
i Combination of 34 independent series. * Partly cstlnrctod.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 89: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
224 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. F E B R U A R Y 1923.
BECEIPTS OF GRAIN AND FLOUR AT 17 INTERIOR CENTERS.
[Compiled from reports of trade organizations at Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, Duluth, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Little Rock, Louisville, Memphis-Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Omaha, Peoria, St. Louis, Spokane, Toledo, Wichita; receipts of flour not available for Cleveland, Detroit, Indi,anapolis, Louisville, Omaha, Spokane, Toledo, Wichita.]
Year and month. Wheat. Corn. Oats. Rye. Barley. Total grain. Flour. Total grainand flour.
19191920392119221921—December.1922—January...
February..MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugust . . . .September.October...November.December.
Bushels.400,589,032354,358,805468,810,549441.696,83024,572,14920.341,25824,108,99020,396,20516,892,87930,125,79721,092,99345,407,44462,643,64859,905,15348,936,90243,779,36548,016,196
Bushels, t193,675.010226,405,509355,470,146395.835,60241,730,56555,068,80157,893,22730,650,6S215,356,74427,304,11332,693,59626,365,94922,058,39634,740,80932,577,31024,021,79937,044,116
Bushels.257,402,057235.377,864235,617,178244,774,02614,660,54S18,323,11619,328,47716,464,83110,810,06621,471,26519,138,70318,442,91426,519,12822,910,07525,092,73223,761,35022,511,369
Bushels.47,852,76844,546,73930,910,02664,232,5842,345,5201,266,9391,589,0533,254,0641,417,1764,563,6861,823,9811,433,103
14,084,51611,980,4967,867,2967,831,5687,120,716
Bushels.92,948,30646,033,61339,852,76440,414,4801,704,2542,205,3392,357,8843,291,0331,880,9602,933,4403,269,1292,283,2314,121,2235,086,5724.606,8594,103,6124,215,192
Bushels.992,467,173906,722,530
1,130,660,6631,186,953,532
85,013,03697,265,453
105,277,63174,056,81546,357,83186,458,30178,018,40293,932,641
129,426,911134,623,165119,131,099103,497,694118,907,589
Barrels.26,538,14122,500,23527,608,15330,664,2551,889,5631,768,0171,851.9132,054,4801,992,7182,204,2402,198,3702,611,9982,989, .5083,924,1993,337,2803,305,4542,426,078
Bushels.1,111,889,4141,007,973,5861,254,857,3541,324,940,337
93,516,070105,221,530113,611.24083,301,97555,322,71896,377,38187,911,067
105,686,632142,879,697152,282,061134,1*8,859118,372,237129,824,940
SHIPMENTS OF GRAIN AND FLOUR AT 14 INTERIOR CENTERS.
[Compiled from reports of trade organizations at Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, Duluth, Kansas City, Little Rock, Louisville, Milwaukee, Minneapolis,Omaha, Peoria, St. Louis, Toledo, Wichita; shipments of flour not available for Cleveland, Detroit, Louisville, Omaha, Toledo, Wichita.]
Year and month. Wheat. Corn. Oats. Rye. Barley. Total grain. Flour. Total grainand flour..
1919..1920192119221921—December.1922—January...
February.,MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugust . . . .September,October...November.December.
Bushels.255,918,478240,776,552305,782,592290,995,03414,051,38612,211,71512,463,16114,719,42011,837,30126,267,51022,561,75528,551,52449,633,37132,941,63428,019,62927,399,16324,388,851
Bushels.99,709,408
104,639,381224,400,360248,703,89417,309,78229,167,37131,100,28122,999,30815,399,87321,987,94317,048,31323.904,66819,963,72417,873,04422,061,65613,166,04414,031,669
Bushels.193,251,608153.225,257142,295,973199.865,00110,883,19112,148,25412,105,32116,825,94813,350,59222,838,14321,716,14714,4*5,25417,846,14717,066,34117,186,35618,654,64415,681,854
Bushels.35,014,15552,688,63225,628,74065,893,3841,996,283
359,446721,166881,600
1,558,1577,783,0792,986,170
11,161,15011,902,74910,042,5574,389,6397,459,4456,648,226
Bushels.65,323,81627,604,06327,824,08125,983,5551,335,1791,434,9841,372,6711,919.6261,250,5002,800,2542,276,6021,995,4172,152,3313,055,4172,336,1553,145,5162,244,082
Bushels.649,217,465580,933 885725 931,746831,440,86845,575,82155,321,77057,762,60057,345,90243,396,42381,676,92566,588,98780,058,013
101,498,32280,977,99373,993,43569,824,81262,994,682
Barrels.46,199,23539,972,30544,534,17351,793,1713,271,6382,895,7363,246,9753,878,0903,032,1323,623,7993,554,452 j3,997,5374,845,6426,404,3885,600,7196,470,5784,243,223
Bushels.857,114,026760.809,260926,335,525
1,064,509,13660,298,19268,352,58272,373,98874,797,30757,041,01797,984,02182,584,02198,046,930
123,303,261109,797,73999,196,67198,942,41382,089,186
STOCKS OF GRAIN AT 11 INTERIOR CENTERS.
[Compiled from reports of trade organizations at Chicago, Detroit, Duluth, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Omaha, PeoriaSt. Louis, Toledo.[
Year and month. Wheat. Corn. Oats. Rye? Barley. Total grain.
1919, monthly average1920, monthly average.1921, monthly average,1922, monthly average,1921—December1922—January
FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJ u l y . . . . ;AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
Bushels.46,538,08619,948,41517,273,96919,655,43929,868,64926,671,02827,831,88526,561,40723,840,72817,562,66310,487,06810,365,07511,851,76018,70S,39020,715,81119,796,27921,473,183
Bushels.2,440,7464,020,417
13,268,55515,016,85915,590,90216,836,42226,177,91929,882,93923,911,30215,819,48421,356,26711,803,7434,390,263
t 8,071,6335,153,0134,854,358
11,944,564
Bushels.12,066,92913,118,61139,522,28938,741,76653,917,61852,899,92056,563,70354,040,76450,329,33340,369,04534,857,10730,328,53332,047,61229,562,42930,014,05226,999,32426,889,379
Bushels.11,710,8185,268,7161,515,1163,986,5073,181,5843,854,4824,336,6296,665,8326,295,5621,746,478643,271634,352
2,213,1213,735,5826,095,5775,965,5635,651,633
Bushels.4,717,2841,837,1121,806,9121,214,6611,831,5261,620,0251,475,5011,316,7901,476,349
641,455855,384398,138979,948
1,295,1471,755,1381,325,8461,436,209
Bushels.77,473,86444,193,27173,386,84378,615,231
104,396,279101,881,877116,385,642118,467,732105,853,27476,139,12568,199,09753,529,84651,482,70401,373,18763,733,59158.941,37067 395,363
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 90: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BUIXETIN. 225
TOTAL VISIBLE SUPPLY OF GKAIN IN THE UNITED STATES EAST OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS.
[Bradstreet.]
Year and month.
1921—December1922—January..
February.MarchAprilMay.. . . . .June
Wheat. Corn. Oats.
Bushels.53,278,00047,221,00044,388,00038,258,00033,383,00028,061,00015,943,000
Bushels.25,070,00029;06S,00043,801,00050,036,00037,S9S,0O029,463,03031,534,000
Bushels71,323,00071,602,00074,384,00068,920,00059,538,00050,917,00044,610,000
Year and month.
1922-JulyAugustSeptemberOctober...November.December.
Wheat. Corn.
Bushels.21,533,00030,586,00036,610,00037,410,00037,128,00041,027,000
Bushels.20,561,0008,229,000
13,041,0009,678,00012,034,00017,706,000
Oats.
Butheli.38,224,00040,073.00037,458,00036,401,00034,8S7,OOO34,725,000
RECEIPTS OF GRAIN AND FLOUR AT 9 SEABOARD CENTERS.
[Compiled from reports of trade organizations at Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, New Orleans, San Francisco, Portland (Orcg.),Seattle, Tacoma; receipts of flour not available from Seattle ami Tacomo.]
Year and month. Wheat. Corn. Oats. Rye. Barley. Total grain. Flour. Total Rralnand flour.
19191920192119221921—December1922—January
FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
Bushels.158,774,444208,026,929256,135,821223,593,91527,304,39818,03G, S5413,792,44214,218,7535,369,675
12,703,55713,390,S4617,501,42432,479,72718,878,44517,717,45532,738,72926,766,038
Bushels.10,550,81719,342,43671,9t>0,240
123,470,58011,340,89617,531,85222,240,07221,395,1408,573, SOS6,223,1675,264,0476,478,0176,200,5103,943,1988,791,9047,974,5158,788,350
Bushels.67,074,15030,619,818'26,075,25653,60S,557
1,940,7172,305, 8532,341,9973,930,6613,536,8138,730,4987,279,5214,018,1063,846,0555,406,22S4,937,4824,385,6S42,883,999
Bushels.29,381,95349,880,22020,619,23635,253,8942,094,4421,104,3KS
912,179865,497
1,330,5503,771,3774,278,5522,453,9323,80S, 2324,451,6172,909,3135,052,8624,315,395
Bushels.37,845,48120,121,92229,914,89020,514,032
1,116,1S8647,N02639,G90
1,290,0021,292,7012,062,6151,493,7983,072,5772, K27,1334,500,1444,429,9S02,002,0612,249,403
Bushels.303,599,815327,997,1X1404,825,413462,441,0084.'I,7%, 64139,020,74039,932,3S041,700,11320,103,60733,491,21431,700,76433,524,11049,222,257:j7,17(J,fj323S, 780,14052,153,*5145,008,185
Bushels.23,827,75122,036,83926,300, 23922,132,502
1,745,8731,601,3771,659,7592,0S9, 80S1,559,2"i,s7o,i:>t1,579,4131,375,657l,7(»,0391,77*,0741,955,3572,207,3412,091,309
BunhrU.410,821,627427,102,0105Zi,2dV)21502,037,271
51,653,07040,832,91047,401,29051,110,21927,120,07041,900,9(1738,hi4,12339,714,573rjG,K>4,93345,ISO,90547,5*5,21762,356,8*557,119,076
STOCKS OF GRAIN AT 8 SEABOARD CENTERS AT CLOSE OF MONTH.
[Compiled from reports of trade organizations at Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, New Orleans, Newport News, Galveston, and San
Year arid month.
1919, monthly average-1920, monthly average1921, monthly average1922, monthly average1921—December *1922—January
FebruaryMarch iAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember..OctoberNovember..December..
Wheat.
Bushels.13,45S,79111.922,62811,407,4539,117,3653,486,041
13,156,67110,367,4158 359,9576,411,9535,020,0705,919,4307,235,245
11 207,51810,277,13110,026,27411 781,2029 645,563
Corn.
Bushels.303,842878,182
2,205,4774,345,1412,136,1283,959,4638,250,719
10,510,3887,187,4365,907,2703,402,447
935,805781,694
1,009,7782,619,8863,514,6SS4 065,233
Oats.
Bushels.3,902,6851,645,1181,477,2212,452,5361,058,6521,751,4921,692,1072,0SG,7091,276,9262,744,9363,199,1462,026,8682,813,7642,768,1742,176,6443,255,2003,638,483
Rye.
Bushels.1,307,3181,970,0721,270,0981,52S,9S7
157,3972,60S', 5982,342,5341,840,0891,401,612
760,787363,643257,619339,5095.58,245
2,170,1573,006,5482,695,511
Barley.
Bushels.4,274,2792,705,6302,520,4S22,244,0201,664,0742,229,5052,058,1831,731,2111,395,0791,382,1291,224,2952,901,7343,414,8882,355,8722,638,4752,880,7482,710,149
Total grain.
Bushds.23,246,86419,121,63018,880,73219,6S8,064S, 502,892
23,705,78924,710,95324,528,35117,676,00615,815,19214,108,96113,357,27118,557,37316,^)60,20019,631,43624,43S,3S622,760,939
WHEAT FLOUR PRODUCTION.
[January, 1919, to June, 1920, U. S. Grain Corporation: since July, 1920, estimated by Russell's Commercial News (Inc.), New York.l
Year and month.
191919201921..19221921—December1922—January
Barrels.
132,334,000109,879,000121 225,000128,596,000
8,856,0009 496,000
Year and month.
1922—FebruaryMarchAprUMayJuneJuly
Barrels.
9,232,0009,658,0007,823,0008,073,0008,136,000
10,321,000
Year and month.
1922—AugustSeptember ,October ]NovemberD ecember
Barrels
12,271,00012,540,00013,581,00013,424,00011,041,000
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 91: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
226 FEDERAL BESEKVE FEBBUAEY, 1923.
RECEIPTS OF CATTLE AND CALVES, HOGS, AND SHEEP AT 59 MARKETS, HORSES AND MULES AT 43 MARKETS.
[Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agriculture.l
Year and month. I Cattle and1 calves. Hogs. Sheep.
Head.26,374,08622,963,58523,725,96621,890,0811,622,3151,797,8811,374,0021,438,6661,205,3851,646,4451,675,9001,653,2241,912,7862,216,7083,253,2162,240,7391,475,129
Horses andmules.
Head.1,012,133
694,004306,322415,41923,77644,90335,10744,82327,22419,51114,19215,09723,34639,17455,95252,37443,716
Total.
Head.96,416,05787,425,56784,428,67189,056,8216,945,2957,670,2596,363,7446,462,1345,736,3647,253,2117,203,4096,334,4497,089,2507,657,6189,883,0269,098,0308,305,327
19191920192119221921—December..1922—January
February..MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember.October....November.Docember..
Head.24,441,18521,993,52119,644,73023,027,8981,405,7191,611,0901,401,5551,607,6041,456,4381,867,0791,749,6201,701,7602,137,5312,358,9532,916,6092,407,6321,812,027
Head.44,588,65341,775,45740,751,65343,723,4233,893,4854,216,3853,553,0803,371,0413,047,3173,720,1763,763,6972,964,3683,015,5873,042,7833,657,2494,397,2854,974,455
SHIPMENTS OF ^ATTLE AND CALVES, HOGS, AND SHEEP AT 59 MARKETS; HORSES AND MULES AT 43 MARKETS.
[Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agriculture.]
Year and month. Cattle andcalves. Hogs. Sheep. Horses and
mules. Total.
19191920192119221921—December.1922—January...
February.,MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober...November.December.
Head.10,594,6769,709,2908,527,1798,689,400
677,571663,064576,758624,497555,169774,847698,575664,543
1,030,5911,234,3201,557,4311,332,968
839,792
Head.14,108,74215,120,65214,524,92814,439,0061,734,0961,746,2891,287,5901,158,9131,056,9391,114,5231,109,8231,018,2771,052,3551,142,6681,287,4911,494,5971,648,174
Head.13,893,04012,208,97911,093,76310,920,414
841,946869,625646,104664,438557,624803,665770,154710,791884,555
1,232,7242,158,4601,435,617
668,597
Head.991,152699,341296,084314,64423,60044,16134,48844,86826,45519,24814,79414,17122,46036,48054,62262,19042,160
Head.39,587,61037,738,26234,441,95434,363,4643,277,2133,323,1392,544,9402,492,7162,196,1872712,2832,593,3462,407,7822989,9613,646,1925,058,0044,315,3723,198,723
SHIPMENTS OF STOCKERS AND FEEDERS AT 34 MARKETS.
[Bureau of Agricultural|Economics, Department^ Agriculture.]
Year and month.
19191920...^192119221921—December1922—January
FebruaryMarchApril
Cattle andcalves.
Head.5,225,9173,999,0583,453,8534,799,593
242,334231,294241,325278,420231,305
Hogs.
Head.857,504666,668456,836553,86233,39725,14656,64166,66852,409
Sheep.
Head.6,927,4085,115,9623,085,7654,142,814
205,291182,739168,564143,15497,138
Total.
Head.13,010,8299,781,6876,996,4549,496,269
481,022439,179466,530488,242380,852
Year and month.
1922—MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
Cattle andcalves.
Head.359,391306,712221,055446,170598,779832,972700,299351,871
Hogs.
Head.66,25654,84328,73729,53932,21847,70353,06340,639
Sheep.
Head.145,156181,819202,649350,201514,584
1,136,453756,596263,761
Total.
Head.570,803543,374452,441825,910
1,145,5812,017,1281,509,958
656,271
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 92: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 227
ANIMALS SLAUGHTERED UNDER FEDERAL INSPECTION.
[Bureau of Animal Industry, Department of Agriculture.)
Year and month. Cattle. Calves. Hogs. Sheep. Total.
19191920192119221921—December...1922—January
FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember..OctoberNovember..December...
Head.10,090,9848, COS, 0917,59S,25S8,077,807
5S0,192041,513500,153673,701589,916702,203724,41SG97,303701,12579fi,377883,949859,413778,730
Head.3,909,0274,058,3703, S07,5CS4,182,509
259,045288,487279,351)301,439305,323401,3403S8,919329,4453 14, 90S353, 095382,S37317,711308,010
Head.41,811,83038.018,0843S, 982,37843,093,0293,800,7'JS3,084,70*3,479,9073,340,2142,945,7573,710,1704,010,3013,094,3222,8S7,7552,747,4073,301,5104,315,0705,201,437
Head.12,091,11710,982,18013, (KM ,90510,928,941
KS9,08l954,329775,8118:17,210739,110R72,OG9
1,028,130904,103
1,023,7*71,013,281
981,2:12882,213857,011
Head.CS.5C2.95301,007,92503,393,10900,881,9405,542,0105,809,0335,104,2005,242,5704,010,113f>, 091,7820,187,7775,085,1795,017,0354,910,2205,552,5340,434,4137,140,430
MEATS—COLD STORAGE HOLDINGS ON FIRST OF MONTH.
[Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agriculture]
[000 omitted.]
Year and month.
1921—December1922—January..
February*MarchAprilMay ,June ,
Beef.
Pounds.80,33384,80878,29573,78269,51664,50756,852
Porkproducts.
Pounds.355,5S9462,637546.10060S, 747677,254690,296759,453
Lamb andmutton.
Pounds.7,5206,4443,9142,8632,8782,0712,310
Year and month.
1922—JulyAugust....SeptemberOctober...November.December.
1923—January...
Beef. Porkproducts.
Pounds..7), 70ft47,0304S,21H53,57267,81496,118
116,222
Pounds.801,03??826,53573%AZ'i565,140395,171418,280507,312
Lamb andmutton.
Pounds.3,7203,3083,3703,5393,4583,7084,528
EXPORTS OF CERTAIN MEAT PRODUCTS.
[Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce, Department of Commerce.]
Year and month.
Beef.
Canned. Fresh. Pickled andother cured. Bacon,
Hog products.
Lard.Hams andshoulders.
Pork,pickled.
19211922... ""1921—December.1922—January...
February.MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugust . . . .September,October...November.December.
Pounds.6,114,5682,526,570
154,646155,061193,1482S0,496132,258268,235233,766272,594258,006287,351199,022100,918142,712
Pounds.10,441,5903,665,006
274,250490,503308,736274,322155,168216,674189,045192,449300,117209.413370,411530,214424,891
Pounds.24,513,9S226,243,916
1,325,0561,764,7432,069,0152,797,5152,036,0S31,927,7512,566,9662,016,4092,621,1082,840,9332,36S,S251,888,4921,346,070
Pounds.415,251,197341,825.633
21,309,72926,095,09330,793,68831,180,27420,490,13019,069,74321,067,39132,584,10632,591,19930,447,01328,849,89626,17O,43S39,486,112
Pound*.232,380,4272S9,613,175
15,533,07022,012,00325,209,13623,5S3,14222,763,54924,9SS,32S31,553,32926,667,58218,761,34920,591,90022,090,14025,236,85926,155,858
Pounds,SOS,932,966766,950,112
61,533,03273,194,12875,519,63164,377,38142,459,08950, SIC,58357,249.30166,057,6.S66S,906,S1061.119,66766,332,52462,321,39478,595,915
Pound*.32,980,68038,607,5S1
2,021,7063,772,0S32,816,2602,953,4421,899,6272,342,0193,005,8S33,243,8753,3S3,7454,003,7694,219,5433,802,3423,219,993
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 93: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
228 FEDERAL RESERVE BTTLLETIST. FEBRUARY, 1923.
DAIRY PRODUCTS.
[Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agriculture.]
[000 omitted.]
Butter (pounds). Cheese (pounds).
Receiptsat five
principalmarkets.1
Cold-storage
holdings .2
Receiptsat five
principalmarkets.1
Cold-storage
holdings.2
Eggs (cases).
Receiptsat five
principalmarkets.1
Cold-storage
holdings**
192119221921—December.1922—January...
February..MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober...November.December.
569,367650,48237,17241,69738,89444,91942,69468,89393,13992,82962,49446,41941,35138,67838,475
65,12948,39135,04722,5829,0243,830
67,410103,329103,151112,03996,68073,85747,807
178,625203,49311,23710,68411,31914,58615,75718,80922,75623,94019,81917,72918,23816,10713,749
34,05527,64221,43015,00610,73110,86733,13046,28746,58053,62549,47340,85237,169
14,74816,288
538805
1,0261,9472,9112,5871,9291,5611,028815702491486
2,40388617913949
4,6489,81110,22510,1619,6087,9245,7263,257
1 Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, and San Francisco. 2 Holdings on first day of month.
FISHERY PRODUCTS LANDED BY AMERICAN FISHING VESSELS.
[Boston, Gloucester, Portland, Me., and Seattle. Bureau of Fisheries, Department of Commerce.]
[000 omitted.]
Year and month.
19211922..1921—December1922—January
February
Pounds.
163,294. 195,117
9,06513,53921,472
Year and month.
1922—MarchAprilMayJuneJuly
Pounds.
18,62313,16015,16815,75718,738
Year and month.
1922—AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
Pounds.
20,10717,67117,60213,715
9,505
COLD STORAGE HOLDINGS OF FROZEN AND CURED FISH, ON 15TH OF EACH MONTH.
[Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agriculture.]
[000 omitted.]
Year and month.
1921—December1922—January
FebruaryMarchApril
Pounds.
79,70867,062
40,11232,348
Year and moath.
1922—MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
Pounds.
31,65436,34942,89054,13672,342
Year and month.
1922—OctoberNovemberDecember
1923—January
Pounds.
86,08184,73875,65367,781
COTTONSEED.
[Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce.]
Year and month* Receivedat mills. Crushed.
On hand atmills, closeof month.
Year and month. Receivedat mills.
Crushed.On hand atmills, closeof month.
19191920192119221921—December1922—January..
February.MarchApril
Tons,4,227,3213,656,7274,057,8893,203,685
270,190130,373135,64165,10721,371
Tons.4,713,4713,695,4533,932,1473,031,904
415,553329,961297,118214,91182,455
Tons.
620,117418,349256,872107,05845,970
1922—MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember.October. . .November.December.
Tom.13,55917,93514,97990,931
680,841959,340696,748376,860
Tons.36,21021,82320,53048,816
332,281590,235609,679447,885
Tons.23,31919,43113,88055,995
403,223771,197857,734784,386
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 94: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 229
COTTONSEED OIL.
[Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce.]
[000 omitted.J
Year and month.
192119221921—December..1922—January...
February..MarchAprilMay
Produc-tion.
Pounds.1,284,517
931.662131,336
J00,70691,32172,23727,61012;3S9
Slocks.
Pounds.
100,16798,29569,9;>260,08931,08223,801
Year and month.
1922-JuneJulyAugustSeptember.October...,November.December.
Produc-tion.
Pounds.7,1155,825
13,354OS,COS
178,4061K3,522140,569
Stocks.
Pounds.12,1946,897
10,03851,90690,872
115,247100,983
OLEOMARGARINE.
[Commissioner of Internal Revenue.]
1919192019211922.1921—December1922—January..
Pounds.350,138,000359,906,000210,211,000179,628,00019,412,00016,887,000
Pounds.1922—February i 12,195,000
March '. I 15,263,000April ! 13,686,000May 12,765,000June I 10,010,000July. . . . . I 14,974,000
J 922—AugustSeptember..OctoberNovember..December..
Pounds.11,754,00010,113,00016,180,00019,800,00019,705,000
TOBACCO SALES AT LOOSE-LEAF WAREHOUSES.
[Reports of State authorities.]
Year and month.
192119221921—December..1922—January...
February..,MarchApril ,MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember.October . . . .November..December..
Dark belt,Virginia.
Pounds.58,259,0002-1,547,7107,040,5305,306,046G,3S0,556
862,39549,92149,030
1,850,1093,154,1926,895,461
Bright belt.
Virginia.
Pounds.98,368,21665,289,20911,895,3429,543,411
10,643,6622,712,491
1,585,31319,153,00813,476,6168,174,708
NorthCarolina.
Pounds.336,624,650210,420,66529,912,34616,718,38311,333,3164,302,126
18,159,58045,246,94661,578,03035,465,13217,617,152
SouthCarolina.
Pounds.48,190,13942,586,756
Burley,Kentucky.
17,994,5538,011,6611,223,593
Pound*.248,317,241100,561,33211,069,99427,f>75,37334,519,9244,579,8602,138,7052,26-4,675
832,6551,546,6751,161,5001,009,310
SSI, 8354,866,022
19,184,798
Westerndark.
Kentucky.
.Pound*.100,347,74664,977,54721,079,55720,901,77012,103,9797,189,4102,393,460
043,425363,500406,125178,190120,805315.500
1,278,80018,687,677
SALE OF REVENUE STAMPS FOR MANUFACTURERS OF TOBACCO IN THE UNITED STATES (EXCLUDING PORTO RICO A N DTHE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS). ™ « * u m t u j t«u
[Bureau of Internal Kevenuc, Treasury Department.]
Year and month.
19211922....1921—December..1922—January
February...MarchAprilMay
Largecigars.
Number.6,758,749,8266,892,597,657463,6C3,809443,260,802447,225,986529.162,382501,393,545569,208,725
Smallcigars.
Number.675,936,879706,371,84744,2*8,70061,495,00046,430,80059,535,56049,720,00756,503,200
Smallcigarettes.
Number.50,835,068,91953,529,180,5202,995,934,8733,705,516,4633,125,819,1973,636,032,4433,453,060,8504,601,372,883
Manu-facturedtobacco.
Pounds.350,705,049382,070,51222,057,10430,938,00929,215,61434,395,74328,564,59132,510,797
Year and month.
1922—JuneJulyAugustSeptember.OctoberNovember-December..
Largecigars.
Number.615,253,023585,874,114641,164,181635,771,966693,945,778679,300,302561,041,853
Smallcigars.
Number.57,382,293
114,041,28760,498,28055,496,50053,788,10050,966,80040,514,020
Smallcigarettes.
Number.5,301,643,0205,210,962,0106,373,890,4535,554,301,0974,497,685,1074,524,272,1773,544,623,820
Manu-facturedtobacco.
Pound*.35,099,26932,590 61738,020 97233,807,02032,740,28730,640,66823,546,925
30425—23 7
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 95: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
230 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
FRUIT SHIPMENTS.
[Bureau of Markets and Crop Estimates, Department of Agriculture.]
Year and month. Grape-fruit. Lemons. Apples, Year and month. Grape-
fruit. Lemons. Oranges. Apples.
192119221921—December.1922—January...
February.,MarchAprilMay.
Carloads,12,27514,4181,1161,9291,8182,079'2,208
803
Carloads.11,8879,854
500595677925963
1,821
Carloads.65,89545,7787,5626,2924,443'5,9454,2363,558
Carloads.96,49892,9595,9914,2704,7312,9871,7731,163
X922—JuneJulyAugust. . . .September.October...November.December.
Carloads.1665711
2191,6451,93-41,549
Carloads.1,678
833796496314383368
Carloads,2,0111,5611,1731,1732,5604,7798,017
Carloads.1,1502,3854,315
13,90329,31318,7408,229
SUGAR.
[Seven ports—&ew York, Boston, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Galveston, Savannah, and New Orleans.Trade Journal.]
Willet and Grey, Weekly Statistical
Year and month.
192119221921—December1922—January...
February.MarchAprilMay
Receipts.
Long tons,3,557,6483,603,248
222,773320,773519,522657,700557,186556,511
Meltings.
Long tons.5,095,4575,109,894
264,941290,791415,723535,357531,962577,330
Stocks.
Lang tons.
62,41985,602163,817275,811316,973276,890
Year and month.
1922—JuneJulyAugustSeptember.October....November.December.
Receipts.
Long tons.508,299507,623501,203243,571222,485312,725188,859
Meltings.
Long tons.532,052530,334540,024312,909280,003309,274254,135
Stocks.
Long tons.277,150309,413262,959180,577
. 94,04369,18544,825
VEGETABLE SHIPMENTS.
[Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agriculture.]
Year and month. Whitepotatoes. Onions. Rice. Year and month. White
potatoes. Onions. Rice.
1919..192019211922.1921—December.1922—January...
February..,MarchApril ,
Carloads.
218,450237,93410,49615,39913,59622,10420,115
Carloads.20,88025,95621,88125,9901,0541,7811,022
7243,102
1004b.pockets.7,339,9326,656,076
11,491,062
759,564862,554
1,020,3751,198,126
499,480
1922—MayJ u n e . .
. JulyAugustSeptemberOctober...November.December.
Carloads.20,32221,845IS, 38117,53023,79533,71119,54711,5S9
Carloads.2,325
9451,2982,2014,3614,6872,0181,526
100-lb.pockets.
481,8122S3,198267,552519,652790,466
1,424,9301,287,210
LTJMBER.
Year and month.
National Lumber ManufacturersAssociation.
Numberof mills.
IProduction. Shipments.
Southern Pine Association.
Numberof mills. Production. Shipments.
19191920192119221921—December.1922—January...
February..March. . . . .April
• MayJuneJuly.AugustSeptember..OctoberNovember..December..
4394624524804454654484775355515645725S3
Board feet.12,711,300,00011,858,800,0009,509,900,000
12,927,893,000400,000400,000500,000600,000200,000
l,184i 900,0001,060,600,0001,091,800,0001,326,684,0001,207,220,0001 306,047,0001,235,748,0001,103,194,000
Board feet.12,639,300,00011,324,400,0009,328.100.00012,551,366,000
691,300,000781,500,000738,600,000899,900,000932,200,000
1,253,600,0001,100,600,0001,052,100,0001,230,050,0001,066,742,0001,065,678,0001,149,736,0001,280,660,000
174173169171172157176153150175174174
Board feet4,610,856,0004,530,506,0004,458,745,0001,655,931,000
377,332,000373,231,000352,717,000394,992,000369,008,000437,479,000379,838,000406,958,000401,340,000367,891,000
' 401,975,000405,488,000365,014,000
Board feet.4,606,500,0004,171,858,0004,685,549,000
""348,"i78,"666320,152, 000326,003,000398,599,000422,424,000507,767,000413,617,000405,139,000
301,046,000335,553,000416,683,000409,941,000
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 96: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 192a. FEDERAL KESERVE BULLETIN. 231
LUMBER—Continued.
Year and month.
Western Pine Association.
Numberof mills. Production. Shipments,
West Coast Lumber ManufacturersAssociation (Douglas fir).
Numberof mills. Production. Shipments.
19191920192119221921—December1922—January
February •MarchAprilHayJuneJulyAugust *SeptemberOctober *NovemberDecember
Board feet*1,307,481,0001,646,715,000
896,129,0001,445,524.000
38,901,00035,385,00041,793,00066,609,000
107,892,000158,153,000163,127,000147,490,000169,000,000155,673,000167,813,000141,623,00050,53G,000
Board feet.1,350,237,0001,340,505,000
933,390,0001,477,342,000
83,350,00082,874,00089,272,000
110,551,000131,103,000160,809,000172,205,000133,865,000156,305,000133,325,000109,316,000100.616,00091,000,000
108119124129125119120119120116112135135
Board feet.3,608,297,0003,8-47,459,0002,759,761,0004,2.1*, 789,000
238,036,000326,588,000310,753,000306,618,00030S, 318,000411,529,000350,281,000303,437,000420,215,000342,4m, 000417,083,0003S7,866,000307,095,000
Board feet*3,420,877,0003,3S6,61f>,0002,786,501,0004,000,107,000
207,162,000308,817,000266,755,000280,203,000320,609,000431,975,000371,418,000321,276,000385,017,000298,032,000319,658,000291, am, ooo402,401,000
NAVAL STORES AT THREE SOUTHERN PORTS.
[Savannah, Jacksonville, Pensacola.J
Year and month.
19191920192119221921—December.1922—January...
February.MarchA p r i l . . . . .
Turpentine.
Receipts.
Casks.186,057253,318268,494263,06223,1367,1193,2403,301
13 139
Stocksclose ofmonth.
Casks.670,155333,168569,399322,93766,96553,42333,20419,28011,087
Rosin.
Receipts
Barrels.648,501836,399812,469951,118115,18162,1863S,53344,06958,015
Stocksclose ofmonth.
Barrels.2,685,3441,895 3203,807,0013.707,522
336,680.327,932299,305282,428255,325
Year and month.
1922-MayJuneJulyAugust. . . .September.October...,November,December..
Turpentine.
Receipts.
Casks.29,29528,82338,16730,00029,95430,51925,09224,513
Stocksclose ofmonth.
Casks.4,795
13,35916,72626,0-1128,44430,68140,16145,742
Rosin.
Receipts.
Barrels.59,71200.5SS107,82293,73792,4879S.80499,591
10-5,574
Stocksclose ofmonth.
Barrels.253,787293,0S3303,588329,189334,785320,213352,465355,421
COAL AND COKE.
JProduction figures from Geological Survey, Department of the Interior. Anthracite shipments from Anthracite Bureau of Information.]
Year and month.
Coal,
Bituminousproduction.
Anthracite.
Production. Shipments,
Coke.
Beehiveproduction:
By-productproduction.
19191920 * ".""1921 './'3922 \ .1921—December.,1922-^Tanuary...
February. .MarchAprilMayJune.July .AugustSeptember.October. . . .November..December..
Tons.465,890,00056S,667,000415,922,000407,894,00030,975,00037,604,00040,980,00050,167,00015.779,00020,290,00022,309,00017,003,00027,358,00039,510,00045,141,00045,303,00046,450,000
Tons.88,092,00089,598,00090,473,00052,523,0005,984,0006,258,0006,762,0008,757,000
26,00035,00084,000
116,000161,000
4,979,0008,530,0008,385,0008,430,000
Tons,CG,S55,46266,871,15607,617,713
4,635,9224,848,0535,239,0146,778,667
0)0)
6,567,9286,420,1026,454,876
Tons.19,650,00020,846,0005,561,0008,037,000
oH,000496,000549,000732,000528,000432,000458,000450,000539.000606,000876,000
1,138,0001,233,000
Tons.25,138,00030,834,00019,750,00028,454,0001,844,0001,879,0001,795,0002,137,0002,208,0002,537,0002,5S0,0002,486,0001,794,0002,244,0002,806,0002,925,0003,063,000
1 No figures issued during months of coal strike, April to September, 1922.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 97: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
232 FEDEEAL KESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
CRUDE PETROLEUM*
[Geological Survey,yDepartment of the Interior.]
Year and month. Production.Stocks atclose ofmonth.
Producingoil wells
completed.Year and month. Production.
Stocks atclose ofmonth.
Producingoil wells
completed
1919. . . . . . . .1920192119221921—December1922—January
FebruaryMarchApril
Barrels.377,719,000433,759,000469,868,000551,197,00041,957,00043,141,00040,814,00046,634,00044,635,000
Barrels.
185,623,000196,228,000203,851,000221,588,000235,962,000
Number.20,96624,22214,612
o1,1511,1431,3231,442
1922—MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober.. .November.December.
Barrels,46,456,00045,559,00046,593,00046,521,00045,291,00047,SS5;00047,531,00050,137,000
Barrels.247,093,000255,817,000261,395,000262,707,000263,761,000265,073.000265,017; 000264,578,000
Number.1,5111,6541,7931,7091,5721,3SS1,4501,197
TOTAL OUTPUT OF OIL REFINERIES IN THE UNITED STATES.
[Bureau of Mines, Department of Interior.]
Year and month. Crude oil run. Gasoline. Kerosene. Gas and fuel oil. Lubricating oil.
19191920192119221921-December.1922—January
February..ItarchAprilM
Barrels.361,520,153433,915,029443,362,657
Gallons.957,857,097882,546,699153,549,018
Gallons.2,341,632,1642,320,095,4131,945,126,156
Gallons.7,627,288,5668,861,451,9319,663,516,135
Gallons.846,760,017
1,016,708,349877,859,074
MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember.OctoberNovember.December..
39,222,87538,581,81034,423,44139,093,95838,364,03442,561,63541,804,63344,378,40543,816,99642,534,49844,233,79544,203,471
439,031,398444,622,783398,223,146472,277,870472,920,182513,658,966525,940,600569,711,415549,958,376536,491,988566,278,689567,100,921
170,315,279172,917,141167,220,226178,785,027188,809,385173,824,113173,649,592192,924,420184,382,897197,935,102215,203,459234,436,275
865,769,078858,110,877761,085,329849,105,582791,642,710936,742,331903,056,578959,028,518944,289,105917,857,786921,606,114891,590,171
82,572,66274,313,83169,123,39073,391,25372,945,16879,848,372SO, 138,25791,714,9S788,824,13382,056,71287,340,81489,270,847
I
TOTAL STOCKS AT OIL REFINERIES AT CLOSE OF MONTH.
[Bureau of Mines, Department of Interior.]
Year and month.
1919, monthly average..1920, monthly average..1921, monthly average.,1922, monthly average..1921—December........1922—January
February. . .MarchAprilMay
.JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
Crude oil run. Gasoline.
Barrels.14,935,06716,953,84920,650,536
Gallons.472,411,119464,484,812630,756,902
26,562,424 j30,635,70625,580,397 j31,297,83632,751,66935,475,52236,178,30835,2S6,79S34,029,91933,615,47832,765,84232,765,362
f
586,0S7,132705,711,191807,379,261854,231,655892,267,766856,607,102824,966,456772,908,949703,738,310690,050,809723,5S4,062776,723,619
Kerosene.
Gallons.300,5S1,792379,471, 438402,522,022
341,008,555327,484,281331,423,125321,427,757325, S36,126318,890,131317,574,464324,586,1282S5,520,131270,576,864256,259,432257,878,898
Gas and fuel oil.
Gallons.778,395,398687,857,986
1,161,925,822
1,331,265,4391,319,481,3591,321,5S9,4791,250,277,7611, 282,800,5691,321,437,9721,326,939,6621,353,870,2841,366,611,6111,304,957,1651,358,748,8801,352,347,667
Lubricating oil.
Gallons.161,491,337137,211,877231,171,628
216,765,516
236,886,381237,229,814226,293,334226,903,812226,690,749220,668,498214,727,811217,775,124226,429,537
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 98: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 233
ELECTRIC POWER PRODUCED BY PUDLIC UTILITY PLANTS.
[Geological Survey, Department of tho Interior.)
[In thousand kilowatt-hours.]
Year and month.
19191920 . . . . . . . .192119221921—December1922—January
FebruaryMarch. . .April
Produced bywater power.
24,348,67116,494,91014,932,80917,238,8031,322,1011,207,341], 222,8251,470,4241,490,254
Produced byfuels.
14,601,75127,444,99126,001,77930,437,2462,497,5912,512,3092,246,9242,352,9S02,108,215
Total.
38,950,42243,939,90140,937,58847,676,0493,819,6923, S09, (3503,469,7493,823,404
Year and month.
1922-May
JulvAugustSeptemberOctober
December
Produced bywater power.
1,550,9.101,494,7661,358,2921,352,4951,300,988
Produced byfuels.
2,176,9172,247,4S72,314,3682, WiO, 1422,690.9122,979,010
V, isJ' 190
Total.
3,825,3673,837,1153,871,3244,074,90*4,019,201
4|ioa'ssb4,574,574
IRON AND STEEL.
[Pig-iron production, Iron Age; steel-ingot production, American Iron and Steel Institute; unfilled orders, United States Steel Corporation;structural steel sales, Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce; steel barrels, Steel Barrel Manufacturers' Association.]
Year and month. Pig-ironproduction.
Steel-ingotproduction.
Unfilledorders,
U. S. SteelCorporation.
Structuralsteel sales.
Steel barrels.
Shipments. Unfilledorders.
19191920192119221921—December.1922—January...
February. .MarchAprilM a y . . . . . . .JuneJulyAugust —SeptemberOctober . . .NovemberDecember.
Tons.30,582,87836,414,11416,543,68626,880,3831,649,0861,644,9511 629,9912,035,9202,072,1142,306,6792,361,0282,405,3651,816,1702,033,7202 637,8442,849,7033,0S6,S9S
Tons.29,191,40034,432,25216,826,94629,116,4531,427,0931,593,4821,745,0222,370,7512,444,5132,711,1412,634,4772,4S7,1042,214,5822.373,7792,872,4152,889,2972,779,890
Tons. Tom. Number, Number*
4,268,4144 241,6784,141,0694,494,148 ;5,096,917 i5,254,228 i5,635,5315,776,1615,950,1056,691,6076 902,2876,840,2426,745,703
71,50072,10078,700139,300198,529180,558162,139152,023150,700141,418126,535106,315125,479
1,314,4982,308,655
124,00689,210
101,830168,476200,214225,3722G0.0U220,992244,291206,448189,4s!104,009201,319
193,814204,204248,315281 794350,445416,477427,739331,881309,044322,632287,141385, &S1424,107
NONFERROUS METALS.
[Copper and silver, American Bureau of Metal Statistics; zinc, American Zinc Institute; tin deliveries, Now York Metal Exchange.)
Year and month.
19191920.. . . .192119221921—December1922—January - —
FebruaryMarch.:
, AprilM a y . . .JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
. . . . . . .
• - • • • *
. . .
- •
•
. \ . \
. . . .
• • •
Copper pro-duction.
Pounds.1,209,284,0001 270,496,000
472,020,310990,739,198
18,595,182•25,S4S,2S437,415,80862,305,40377,025,86092,043,03695,222,35893,486,402
100,320,48396,494,873
103,831,233102,845,152103,&45,306
Silver produc-tion.
Ounces.
53," 727," 891*55,468,8363,896,9523,937,7843,878,49S4,186,0*24,138,5804,257,9734,760,1604,340,5745,561,5235,324,8735,160,7324,869,9055,052,192
Zinc.
Production.
Pounds.943,112,000959,544,000431,228,000747,356,000
44,026,00047,412,00045,026,00053,064,00051,012,00054,83S,00057,094,00063,834,00062,846,00066,268,00079,SS0,O0080,400,00085,682,000
Stocks.
Pounds.
""l33,"216*666"131,356,000128,248,000120,524,000103,456,00080,818,00059,152,00057,216,00043,255,00037,612,00036,086,00038,994,00036,504,000
Tin deliveries.
Pounds.73,251,240
114,508,80058,051,840
128,876,4008,310,4009,576,0007,201,000
13,507,20011,188,80010,617,60011,491,20010,281,6009,462,000
11,312,00012,550,72010f 778,88010,903,600
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 99: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
234 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBBUABT, 1923.
COTTON.
[Sight receipts, American Spinners' Takings, New Orleans Cotton Exchange; all other figures, Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce.]
Year and month. Sightreceipts.
Americanspinners'takings.
Stocks atmills.
Stocks atwarehouses.
Consumptionby mills.
Spindlesactive during
month.
19191920192119221921—December1922—January . .
FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober.November . . .December
Bales. j11,611,853 I10,903,821 I11,954,628 I11,667,8251,483,719 !
865,281462,383 i485,865 ;433,627 ]593,752 i506,575 |392,922540,895 !
1,389,0115,331,4782,155,597 I1,510,439 !
Bales.5,227,3323,928,3306,394,5566,362,025
953,765623,117307,990259,474212,103366,547371,910322,037403,803366,864788,272
1,149,9651,189,943
Bales. Bates.
1,738,0001,675,0001,597,0001,554,0001,458,0001,420,0001,332,0001,215,0001,025,0001,065,0001,380,0001,721,0001 921,000
5,207,0004,618,0004,222,0003,766,0003,214,0002,561,0001,936,0001,488,0001,550,0003,218,0004,330,0004,198,0004,075,000
Bales.5,919,5205,843,2005,407,3756,089,540
510,925526,552473,073518,450446,843495,674507,869458,875527,404495,344533,950577,561527,945
Number.
34,439,14234 457,50933,797,38031,874,49631,389,25631,653,06131,877,01531,975,26932,499,32433,296,51333,859,07634,664,63034,968,440
WOOL.
[Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce. Total grease equivalent in pounds.J
Year and month.
1921. . . . .1922 v. . . . .1921—December1922—January
February
Consumption.
529,495,000654,125,99949,441,00052,280,00053,774,000
Year and month.
1922—MarchAprilMayJuneJuly
Consumption,
60,368,00042,574,00052,533,09152,620,98546,902,071
Year and month.
1922—AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
Consumption.
57,339,99454,770,61259,281,77463,313,17059,366,980
ACTIVE WOOL MACHINERY.
[Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce.]
1921—December1922—January
February
AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember..October...November . . . . . .December
Percentage of active wool machinery to total reported.
Looms.
Widerthan 50-inch reed
space.
69.765.768.565.160.362.763.664.164.772.477.180.869.7
50-inchreed
space orless.
78.872.872.972.264.064.766.671.567.576.479.182.078.8
Sets ofcards.
74.174.081.983.683.686.185.885.284.386.285.885.774.1
Combs.
81.581.786.476.370.372.975.073.176.078.386.887.081.5
Spinning spindle.
Woolen.
74.973.079.982.582.785.585.783.782.984.784.484.474.9
Worsted.
87.085.785.674.761.666.868.168.074.881.489.190.087.0
Percentage of active hours to total reported.
Looms.
Widerthan 50-inch reed
space.
67.164.865.963.158.462.463.862.863.672.478.680.067.1
50-inchreed
space orless.
72.208.068.163.553.455.259.962.558.371.377.772.772.2
Sets ofcards.
72.975.484.488.486.289.791.088.288.891.393.893.772.9
Combs.
98.696.397.282.372.779.281.280.485.593.2
106.4• 111.4
98.6
Spinning spindles.
Woolen.
74.474.681.685.984.888.689.986.086.288.190.689.774.4
Worsted.
86.286.182.770.862.165.368.560.171.484.094.093.786.2
Numberof firmsroport-
ing.
1,0011,002
992990988948958959954988994993987
SILK.(Silk imports, Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce, Department of Commerce; consumption and stocks, Silk Association of America. J
Year and month.
1921.. . .1922L921—DecemberL922—January
FebruaryMarch..!
May ;."
Imports.
Pounds.45,361,663
5,824,2023,880,8772,963,976*42,508,4302,574,262]4; 217,137-
Consump-tion.
Bales.322,189367,620
20,93033,84222,10726,65124,24733,284
Stocks.
Bales.
19,60131,13928,98222,07719,26820,826
1Year and month.
1922-JimeJulyAugust .-SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
Imports.
Pounds.5,076,6653,592,5085,547,4863,887,4007,152,404
Consump-tion.
Bales.29,52924,99634,77234,21237,47135 46731,042
Stocks.
Bales.26,89527,47432,51536 79545,89347,15949 174
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 100: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
FKBRUAKY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 235
SALES OF RAWHIDES AND SKINS.
[Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce.!
Year and month.
192119221921—December.1922—January...
February..31arehAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober.. .November,December.
Cattle hides, j Calfskins. Kipskins. Goat andkid.
Number.17,167,721IS, 043,6421,527,SO*1 293,9371,305,5643,501,6551,314,3S5 j1,492,349 !1,507,0011,035,4991.541,7701 565,9341,732,7791,541,5741,547,595
Number*8,700,250
11,326,987781,176077, 102642,723007,710811,129
1,001,1551,019,2791,15?,2S71,141,4331,358,0131,121,087
900,2308S0.449
Number.2,225,690
25,400,035292,16G250,010208,702 ,!136,819 i165,621 I151,713 |182,631 I200,533 !214,925 I209,0.W ;253,507 '335,578230,875
Number*.11,732,81010,265,3331,333,202
985, flttt813,032
1,230,3191,401,1591,009,2111,23I,2W1,534,8231,113,7301,589,4031,996,8101 508 1261,7SS792
CabrcLta.
Number.GG0.642588,338
18,80041,34509,87809,25125,08001,12527,05021,31121,SGS40,53000, CIS52,38291,301
Sheep andIamb.
Number.18,304,72029,100,9102,004,2231,613,1441,481,7411 276,2861,007,6112,131,0022,737,6032,892,3032,545,8633.1&5.9173,875,6483,000,9902,815,707
STOCKS OF RAWHIDES AND SKINS AT CLOSE OP MONTH.
[Bureau ol the Census, Department of Commcrcc.l
Year and month. Cattle hides. Calfskins. Kipskins. Goat andkid. Cabrctta. Sheep and
lamb.
1919, monthly average1920, monthly average1921, monthly average1922, monthly average1921—December1922—January
FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
Number.5,721,1255,472,9956,859,5695,692,6335,819,2196,053,2125,761,3945,662,0975,553,0915,362,6075,347,2795,366,4145,342,6075,515,4205,838,4126,163,3876,345,676
Number.1,895,3082,331,6713,308,6123,338,8322,965,2572,897,4652,820,0762,964,7733,131,2703,319,1903,507,7223,624,7693,582,9053,674,3563,463,2963,691,7073,298,399
Number.G36,357917,397
1,079,1959*2,101
1,025,1691,040,018
950,505'916,091832,453903,229876,226917,007948,543 !989,661
1,OSS,7151,153,2281 163 547
Number.14,198,42017,738,6059,984,1538,769,245 i
10,379,703 |8,998,4627,627,0488,044,0799,404,784 ;9,838,941 !
10,799,335 i9,067,5169,196 731 I8,640,858 }8,680,967 i8,202,0008,730,219
Number.1,872,6401,802,6291,176,892
747,958547,335500,093455,972301,4G3704 787918,792878,239876,883602,534810,088840,855
1,036,120927,670
Number.8,401,7938,986,703
13,174,07410,916.94912,001,43812,280,83113,044,64411,940,72311,830,25911,142,15010,971,4459,896,733
11,294,35410,474,7409,501,3049,408,6410,151,484
PRODUCTION OF LEATHER.
[Prior to July, 1922, Tanners' Council; since July, 1922, Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce.]
Year and month.
1919. . . . ,19201921 ""'1922 \ ..""'1921—December1922-January. . .
February.MarchApril ,
Soleleather.
Sides.22,515,41818,392,74017,990,69717,456,3601,753,7551,654,7441,466,1651,472,5281,327,037
Skivers.
Dozens,180,384159,284199,836300,15620,14917,95017,02119,45116,065
Oak andunion
harness.
Side*stuffed.1,142,9231,153,090
675,1951,261,460
62,55159,81565,06778,10094,59S
Year and month.
1922—MayJuneJulyAugust....SeptemberOctober...November.December.
Soleleather.
Sides.1,320,6351,358,9731,397,59-41,509,3041,490,0331,550,7901,482,0741,42.5,512
Skivers.
Dozens.16,09916,815
»25,238135,488»35,S95134,594133,797131,743
Oak andunion
harness.
Side*stuffed.
90,81395,9.53
115,561133,268130,944133,146134,589129,606
1 Reports from 13 additional contributors included.OUTPUT OF BOOTS AND SHOES.
[Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce.]
Year and month.
19221921—December1922—January
FebruaryMarchAprilMay
Men's.
Pairs.89,984,0057,455,2187,770,6816,697,2767,731,5196fSQ2fU96,495,060
Women's.
Pairs.105,367,667
7,747,9267,976,1258,665,019
10,529,4658,921,9628,714,277
All other.
Pairs.12S,124,726
9,035,6299,373,1059,1SS,95S
ll,0S9,32210,927,40111,018,125
Total.
Pairs.323,476,45824,241,77325,119,11124,551,25329,350,30626,651,51226,227,402
Year and month.
1922—JuneJulyAugust. .SeptemberOctober.NovemberDecember
Men's.
Pairs.6,214,0746,317,6257,949,3678,514,0-138,556,8408,700,3358,235,090
Women's.
Pairs.8,257,2857,652,5539,061,8448,741,4499,530,7558,937,7328,379,200
All other.
Pair*.10,159,7088,715,569
10,664,77511,032,67712,268,04712,435,06111,238,978
Total.
Pairs.24,631,06822,685,74727,675,9862S,258,16930,365,64830,076,12827,853,268
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 101: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
236 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
CLAY FIRE BRICK.
[Refractories Manufacturers' Association."!
Year and month.
19191920192119221921—December.1922—January...
February.MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember.OctoberNovember.December.
Production.
Number.608,975,000728,577,000384,347,000558,149,00034,000,00030,121,00034,683,00042,626,00041,446,00046,794,00048,367,00047,266,00051,828,00048,839,00055,996,0C056,546,00053,637,000
Shipments.
Number.607,598,000749,2(50,000349,362,000554,231,00030,596,00031,301,00030,043,00038,694,00038,458,00044,120,00045,772,00045,851,00049,075,00052,693,00059,299,00054,423,00054,502,000
Stocks.
Number.
145,406,000138,574,000146,911,000149,031,000150,292,000152,259,000153,517,000158,236,000162,876,000156,899,000152,101,000155,876,000155,011,000
New orders.
Number.617,446,000741,708,000275,496,00058^,201,00027,915,00031,222,00035,941,00043,098,00045,815,00051,041,00057,805,00055,681,00052,300,00059,771,00051,120,00054,187,00050,884,000
Unfilled orders.
Number.
23,108,00023,751,00030,357,00031,537,00039,402,00045,300,00056,861,00067,557,00074,399,00079,511,00070,860,00071,096,00067,400,000
SILICA AND FACE BRICK.
[Silica brick, Refractories Manufacturers' Association; face brick, American Face Brick Association.]
Year and month.
Silica brick.
Production. Shipments. Stocks closeof month.
Face brick.
Production.- Shipments.Stocks insheds and
kilns.
19191920 .
,192119221921—December.1922—January...
February..MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember.October. . .November.December.
Number.168,744,000178,850,00066,228,000
133,143,0004,754,0006,581,0006,663,0009,120,0009,830,000
12,233,00011,578,00011,332, COO9,666,000
12,861,00015,755,00013,871,00013,653,000
Number.168,096,000186,960,00066,624,000
126,260,0007,321,0008,246,0007,263,0007,837,000
10,485,00010,704,00010,676,COO12,533,0CO11,687,00011,332,00013,161,00011,359,00010,977,000
Number.
38,812,0^036,344,00035,743,00036,944,00036,316,00037,815,00038,747,00037,572,00035,743,00037,10S!00039,730,00042,269,00045,081,000
Number.542,202,000541,830,000428,174,000547,664,00038,444,00025,331,00022,926,00042,133,00046,767,00054,867,000'59,756,00052,408,00046,849,00051,674,00057,185,00042,587,00045,181,000
Number.
334,209,000476,331,00323,151,00014,902,00018,392,00037,491,00047,326,00056,433,00055,762,00050,579,00046,710,00043,621,00041,062,00032,900,00030,653,000
Number.
160,961,000152,485,000151,769,000156,906,000144,223,000121,540,000118,756,000109,545,00091,339,000
100,559,000101,782,00093,209,000
118,626,000
CEMENT.
[United States Geological Survey.]
Year and month.
19191920192119221921—December1922-^Tanuary
FebruaryMarchApriJ
Production.
Barrels.80,769,378
100,302,00098,293,000
113,870,0006,559,0004,291,0004,278,0006,685,0009,243,000
Shipments.
Barrels.85,596,61696,329,00095,051,000
116,563,0003,697,0002,931,0003,285,0007,002,0008,592,000
Stocks.
Barrels.
ll,93S,00013,316,03014,142,00013,848,00014,470,000
Year and month.
1922—MayJune. . . .July ;AugustiScptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
Production.
Barrels.11,176,00011,245,00011,557,00011,664,00011,424,00012,287,00011,349,0008,671,000
Shipments.
Barrels.12,749,00013,470,00013,850,00014,361,00012,444,00012,854,00010,167,0004,858,000
Stocks.
Barrels.12,893.00010,718,0008,433,0005,746,0004,724,0004,149,0005,320,0009,134,000
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 102: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL, RESERVE BULLETIN. 237
OAK FLOORING.
[Oak Flooring Manufacturers' Association.]
Year and month. Production, j Shipments. Orders booked.
1919. ...1920192119221921—December...1922—January
February.. .MarchApril ,MayJune ,JulyAugustSeptember.OctoberNovember.December..
Hoard feet.121,215,000128,931,0°014*, 929, Mm274,621,000
17,510,00019.202,00017,2*2,00021),3ii7,OMf>19.S92.00021,914,00023,495,00024,082,00027,009,00023,903,00026,357,0002G,S2S,00023,473,000
hoard feet.132,84 2, (XX) |
1 OS* 131*001) !2S7t33.V,O0O I
18,005,00014,970,00010,455,000
22,'2271000 I25,251, (XX) !2S,010,000 j24,201,000 !27,037,(XX) '25,072,00029,185,00020,431,00024,510,000
Hoard fed. !
7fiJi5*(XKJ10S, OM\(XK)2S 1,071*000
13,070,000i:*,ftoo,o(Xi :1fi,O03,(KX)23, 47l.»,(tfX)
3 , ,21, 472, (NX)21,310,00025,971,00021,991, IKK)23,97.1,00029,209,00023W\OO0
Stocks. !Unfilled orders.
Hoard feet, \ hoard fret.
21,703.000'27,407,(1002 \ K.Vi,(KKI2 \0W,0M20,015,000 ;23,531.000an, 21.1,0001*1,712,00021,0M,0M ;20,120,00019,ni4(fKK»19,132,000 ••212MW0
20,SKS,00021.230,00021,007,00024,03.1, (HX);n,f/)i,ofK)40,417,0003 \ 431,00035, (.37, (XX)37,173,0003.1,937,00032,?.«5,Onn35,209,00040,92^,000
MAPLE FLOORING.
[Maple Flooring Manufacturers' Association.]
Year and month.
19191920192119221921—December.1922—January...
February.MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober...November.December.
Production. Shipments.
Board feet.120,468,000121,596,000100,53*, 000137,020,000 ]11,713,00011,021,0009,274,0009,218,0009,093,000
10,701,00011,806,00010,434,00013,047,00012,518,00013,442,000 i12,753,000 '13,648,000
Board feet.142,170,00099,108,00097,451,000
143,203,0000,042,0008,533,0007,947,000
10,5-18,00010,631,00013,GOO, 00014,280,000 !12,956,000 i14,002,000 !12,705,000 j12,243,000 !13,010,000 !12,752,000 |
Stocks. ; Orders booked. Unfilled orders.
hoard feet. Jioard fed.W,,i%mf>1,272, (XX)
107,S%,OriO140,50.1,(XX) i
30,S65,O00 | 0,927,000 :33,329,000 : 7,051,000 i31,24ft, 000 : S, 105,000 :3:3,032,000 11,923,000 :32,174, OW 13,S53,(W) ;2S,793,(KX) H),070,(XX> !2ft,719,000 i 13,920,000 ;24,52Ji,(XW 11,078, (XX)23,272,000 11,950,00023,111,000 12,093,000 |24,344,000 11,791,000 ;23,90S, (XX) : 11,2*1,000 !25,156,000 ! 14,444,000 •
hoard feel.
13, SOI, (XX)12,220, (XX)11,M8,00011,2*2,000]7,S39,(X)02.1,(^,0002033f)(XJ025,076,00022, frfW, 0(X)22,397,00021,872,00020,5SO,00022,324,000
ENAMELED SANITARY WARE.
[Enameled Sanitary Ware Manufacturers' Association.]
Year and month.
19191920192119221921—December....1922^—January
FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember....OctoberNovember*...December
Baths.
Ordersshipped.
Number.415,295617,292498,137866,73338}$1S48,425
' 52,57565,24378,13082,10082,37870,70078,43575,76678,83474,94379,204
Stocks.
Number.
•""53*146"53,42256,75970,58760 26047,69437,84629,75022,77521,19526,79933,12634,517
Ordersreceived.
Number.838,464441,288490,934
l,0Sl,S3941,99358,42049,13463,815
107,566150,475128,87699,23582,53679,72276,73789,69095,6.33
Lavatories.
Ordersshipped.
Number.549,216617,256698,033
1,071,97345,17663,017
. 70,65491,039
101,482107,708102,34584,07794,219SS,16187,32590,32491,592
Stocks.
Number.
'*iii,'S34'102,190101,566126,228104,54378,0626S,55S62,34958,48352,82656,34059,64559,595
Ordersreceived.
Number.883,344641,256678', 780
1,374,80049,90180,12468,41495,891
138,757192,546102,788111,45593,76599,23293,800
103,976124,052
Sinks.
Ordersshipped.
Number.655,008722,772797,493
1,124,SSO57,43073,87773,66090,764OS,905
109,377107,07187,49295,23590,45097,37996,645
103,418
Stocks.
Number.
**i33,"6i4"129,580129,505152, ©SO135,071102,74782,83170,78959,4006S,03455,51261,18364,908
Ordersreceived.
Number.1,056,216
090,021774,922
1,403,20562,22281,79171,43495,137
140,020195,503160,095123,938102,617112,951103,089139,373132,847
Miscellaneous.
Ordersshipped.
Number.340,595372,744403,683531,447
27,51338, S3135,44044,91249,40250,64448,50740,18742,63447,45043,06942,42947,336
Stocks.
Number*
91,04383,24260,742SG,33485,52877,78806,63062,98159, OSS49,97550,10150,45156,284
Ordersreceived.
Number.502,800332,2923Sl,64l712,04329,87954,54535,24048,06263,01080,34174,15961,49156,51657,81351,83262,93565,199
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 103: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
238 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
WOOD PULP.
[Federal Trade Commission.]
Year and month.
1919....1920192119221921—December1922—January....-
FebruaryMarchApril
Produc-tion.
Short tons.3,384,7683,807,6562,801,4383,464,258
272,835266,921243,310314,591 1297,467
Consump-tion.
Short tana.2,609.8222,973,4562,297,9782,907,565
213,571220,034202,449249,204236,837
Shipments,
Short tons.763,598840,066506,191603,31747,89640,66738,26547,83943,991
Stocks, endof month.
Short tons.
176,113178,709196,257212,896
Year and month.
1922—MayJuneJulyAugust . . .SeptemberOctoberNovember,December.
Produc-tion.
Shortltons.331,694313,259279,308282,570272,679284,642300,746277,071
Consump-tion.
Shortw(ons.i 257,986t 250,978
238,173f 258,871
239,801261,320254,314237,568
Shipments.
Shortjtons.t 54,151*• 48,662* 47,987* r 52,962\ [54,318
64,90S58,52051,046
Stocks, endof month.
Short tons.232,453246,072239,220209,957178,517136,931124,843113,301
PAPER PRODUCTION.
[Federal Trade Commission.]
Year and month. Newsprint.
Short tons.1,374,5171,511,9681,226,1891,447,688
107,877105,80897,786
117,507111,861129,950127,230120,839133,236125,402130,682127,983119,404
Book.
Short tons.914,823
1,104,164725,992
• 893,43070,79873,46669,40377,88970,50782,57483,51774,43587,92287,78292,86593,06588,489
Paper board.
Short tons.1,950,0372,313,4491,664,9311,970,716
149,047145,198153,704192,308164,327176,790183,759165,551195,115198,248196,769198,947185,397
Wrapping.
Short tons.694,207831,889651,605761,44964,85065,79162,03570,14161,56271,49468,37165,48174,31570,32974,63077,30074,822
Fine.
Short tons.343,762389,322242,485330,11825,84327,405
" 26,66329,31627,42030,12931,29127,76733,08131,57633,77431,66630,932
Total.
19191920192119221921—December.1922—January...
February..MarchApr i l . . . . . .MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober.. .November.December.
Short tons.5,277,3460 150,7924,511,2025,403,401
418,415417,668409,596487,191435,677490,937494,168451,073523,669513,337528,720528 961499,044
PAPER STOCKS ON HAND AT CLOSE OF MONTH.
[Federal Trade Commission.]
Year and month. Newsprint. Book. Paper board. Wrapping. Fine. Total.
1921—December.1922—January...,
February...MarchAprilMayJuneJ u l y . . . . . . . .AugustSeptember.,OctoberNovember..December..
Short tons.23,93426,55027,81528,18024,87424,78123,36721,15619,90218,81019,74519,65119,2OS
Short tons.38,75738,46339,33438,36737,36739,49141,45638,52037,47336,71738,15836,77036,231
Short tons.63,01862,17363,90871,98669,75665,70267 07964,03359,62757,89952,96855,86454,693
Short tons.48,84854 50659,25164,93168,40170,90671,25969 36862,44454,84348,66145,53964,625
Short tons.34,00035,33135,80435 12335,80636,98538,67437 62137,88936,21336,49036,88036,742
Short tons.208,557217,023226,112238,587236,204237,865241,835230,698217,335204,482196,32219c,704211,499
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 104: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL BESEKVE BULLETIN. 239
RUDDER AND AUTOMOBILE TIRES AND TUBES.
India-rubber imports, Bureau of Foreign ami Domestic Commerce, Department of Commerce; all other figures, Rubber Association of America.)
Year and month.
192119221921—December1922—January
FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugust . .SeptemberOctoberNovember. . .December....
India-rubberimports.
Pound:.415,274,280
58,641,82154,010,91666,744,21064,215,22243,407,35935,727,05S50,952,02456,851,75851,332,27544,314,862
Pneumatic ttrcs.
Produc-tion.
Thousands,21,82030,099
1,8102,0552, OS I2, GIG2,4012,7222,8392,4772,9052,5052,r,752,733
Ship-Slocks. ; incnts,
domestic.
Thousands.
3,097•1,1714,6015,1 S35,4615,5235,0424 8344,G29
4Ji83 !4,065 1
Thouwwdt,22, S».»720/222
1 'ISO1,.W1,5022,0712.0S72t(i3<»
! 3,1332,0953,0302,5022,5892,3S0
Inner tubes.
Produc-tion. Storks.
2,070
3 , S2,0512,9703,1313,0083,808350 l
Thousands. Thousand^27,102
72.4ft!1,7315,217
2rr,97 I 0,112
3,O1S ! ft,<>ftl7,2307,1900,1 S75,G7f>5,2075,1015,4883,783
3,851 6,210
.Ship-ments,
27t.rV)7
:Mifft
1,7(02 Ml2.3292,0393,0713,^14,2203,5593,4213,075
Solid tires.
Vrodur-t(on.
12 T
Stocks.
IS,019,07721, ISO, 410
26,771! 2 4ft21,125,450
02
2H, 05], Od.1.'i0,K'.M,00028,071,802
AUTOMOBILES.
[Automobile Chamber of Commerce and Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.]
Year and month.
1920192119221921—Decem ber.1922—January...
February..MarchApril
Production.
Passen-ger cars(num-ber).
1,435,1612,316,641
70,43581,61498,487
152,647196,788
Trucks(mini'ber).
Shipments.
train(car-
loads).
147,009236,432
8,1839,162
12,86119,44921,862
251,064195,477331,22612,31015,35719,63627,75331,334
Drive- Bya ways boat(ma- | (ma-
chines), chines).
470,8671144,446304,75s
7,5017,479
10,17316,91722,381
32,8S322,3105S,2J2
188143180560
2,960 1
Year and month.
1922—MayJune ;JulyAugustSeptember .•...OctoberNovemberDecember
Production.
Passen-ger cars(num-ber).
231,829201,924223,057217,316180,103214,090215,225205,650
Trucks)
ber).
t r a * n
(car-d)
w a y s i boat(ml , (ma-
h i ) h i )(car (ml , (ma
loads), chines), chines).
23,1S9 !
2.5,274 |20,073 I23,787 I18^53
19,610
34,41034,23020,1 IG32,81720,33527,100 t ,27,232 27,20,000 ! 27
S27 1M7 !100 i7fiS :
177 !203370500
7,4007| 7377,030
70,1018,1187,0055,0701,300
LOCOMOTIVES.
[Compiled from reports of three largest locomotive companies.]
Year and month.
19191920.1921 .19221921—December1922—January
F e b r u a r y —MarchApril
Output.
Domes-tic,
shipped-
1,8621,316
8301,066
3011403513
For-eign,com-
pleted.
904966563218596344S
Total.
2,7662,2821,3931,284
• 8074443921
Unfilled orders.
Domes-tic.
143147173255515
For-eign.
122626675
102
Total.
265209239330617
Year and month.
1922—MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember...OctoberNovember...December
Output.
Domes-tic,
shipped.
G467
122130113133144194
For-eign,com-
pleted.Total.
16 i 8047 1146
216
121516
Unfilled orders.
1
Domes-tic.
497495
128 712151119145159210
i
For-dgn.
121
Total.
621101 i 59699
926 1001,3171,4201,5011,493
116USUS94
8111,0351,4631,5331,6191,592
VESSELS BUILT IN THE UNITED STATES AND OFFICIALLY NUMBERED BY THE BUREAU OF NAVIGATION.
Year and month.
19191920192119221921—December,1922—January...
February.March . . . .April
INumber.
2,3631,7831,0941,014
45713962
106
4,258,1412,860,7251,263,984
321,54246,10352,76438,3596,203
34,308
Year and month.
1922-May ,June ,JulyAugustSeptember.October....November.December.,
21,41916,959 '19,35611,51115,83433,81527,72043,294
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 105: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
240 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
RAILROAD OPERATING STATISTICS.
[Interstate Commerce Commission.)
Year and month.
19191920192119221921—December1922—January
FebruaryMarchApril
Net ton-milesrevenue
and nonrevenue.
396,904,574,000448,457,325,000344,592,802,000
Net tonsper train.
|25,706,855,00027,105,158,00028,348,199,00032,904,832,00024,727,919,000
609632673691614
Net tonsper loaded
car.
26.827.628.227.824.4
Year and month
1922—MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember .
Net ton-milesrevenue
and nonrevenue.
27,855,386,00029,048,643,00027,073,021,00030,452,607,00034,270,263,00039,260,029,00038,046,185,000
Net tonsper train.
635655645690721732719
Net tonsper loaded
car.
25.025.425.026.327.327.728.2
RAILWAY CAR LOADINGS.
[American Railway Association.]
LOADINGS BY COMMODITIES.
[Number of cars.[
Year and month.Grain and
grainproducts.
Live stock. Coal. Coke. Forestproducts. Ore.
Merchan-dise,
L. C. L.Miscella-
neous. Total.
19191920192119221921—December.1922—January...
Febniar} r.MarchAprilMayJuneJuly -.AugustSeptemberOctober...November.December.
2,036,6341,857,6572,293,9742,468,567186,458210,243206,005185,330136,975189,845171,658217,649252,795222,336225,942229,997219,792
1,727,0121,566,3831,496,9281,637,923128,444135,707116,449123,108112,963132,967126,535115,797133,492151,783174,861168,361145,900
8,747,3299,966,9637,974,1477,447,131582,010703,001759,294885,057302,209371 230406,190327,763443,244738,885845,630848,857815,771
457,006652,767318,289490,77430,62331,56031,54240,09034,00739,58740,87341,55837,63937,52945,98754,41655,986
2,971,3473,076,1182,486,5812,939,046197,840203,997200,495237,322233,559273,204271,358239,119260,282246,441258,503267,857246,909
1,946,4682,417,589906,841
1,586,39824,48318,38616,60623,64240,21582,735234,236275,285298,190227,275202,956125,61241,260
6,344,8399,067,62711,010,09011,877,812
942,819875,296863,973
1,068,7811,010,1681 084,2921.060,1941,004,7971,037,350984,917998,361975,379914,304
17,662,01316,616,97612,836,30615,265,776
940,823881,887880,599
1,159,8811,161,0951,348,1511,379,6541,366,1561,467,1691,441,7021,549,2481,434,7161,195,518
41,892,65445,422,08039.323,16543,713,4273,033,5003,060,1673,074,9653,723,2113,031,1913,522,0113,690,6983,588,1243,930,1614,050,8684,301,4884,105,1953,635,440
LOADINGS BY DISTRICTS.
[Number of cars.]
Year and month. Eastern. Alleghany. Pocahontas. Southern. Northwest-ern.
Central west-ern.
Southwest- Total, alldistricts.
19191920192119221921—December.1922—January...
February..MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober.. .November.December.
10,188,29010,827,5969,556,407
10,570,095757,049742,168760,593938,796711,865833,405830,063826,084921,683984,511
1,060,4461,040,970
919,511
8,903,1349,528,2247,938,5578,957,508
624,966607,982637,285793,295605,759664,281712,928713,60S811,662865,550889,410874,350781,398
1,729,9731,759,8671,503,0471,726,267
104,577130,402141,436164,527147,508183,278188,196134,719133,388116,719129,542131,270125,282
6,031,7796,581,9955,835,7706,437,813
462,89746S,543479,530588,655511,154577,8SS563,910503,153510,707523,151592,336589,632529,154
6,528,2387,004,5705,477,3246,537,428
379,491411,724379,033461,098421,240528,288648,497648,291697,519658,485663,171563,716456,366
5,714,4966,432,2725,909,5336,329,971
457,056468,712450,752513,496408,909478,354485,431502,794585,954614,644656,226610,508554,191
2,834,7353,287,5563,102,5273,154,436
247,464230,636226,336263,343224,756256,517261,673259,475269,248291, SOS310,357294,749269,538
41,930,64545 422,08039,323,16543,713,5183 033,5003 060,1673,074,0653 723 2113,031,9913,522,0113 690 6983,588,1243,930,1614,050,8684,301,4884 105,1953 635,440
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 106: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 241
FREIGHT-CAR SURPLUS, FREIGHT-CAR SHORTAGE, AND HAD-ORDER CARS.
[American Railway Association.]
1921—December.1922—January...
February..MarchApril
- MayJuneJulyAugust... .SeptemberOctober...November,December.
Surplus.
Total.
396,371415,053271,263216,684334,075332,940261,990212,609121,38720,8184,4755.2099,719
Box.
154,403172,56810S, 84588,56896,034SO, 12362,42542,3159,6031,389
119739
2,245
Coal.
Shortage
Total.
192,851186,160109,59381,149
193,811212,'J IK165,238142,79295,13115,7011,9932,10S2,701
187513562437473
1,1482,935
12,13142,91997,919
100,7S715-1,77199,954
Box.
1102034142462295SS
1,1847,200
2K,25151,87980, 21779, SI 847,015
Coal.
1923f>390
162431
l t5813, 3908,654
28,91444,83343,72239,750
Bad-ordercars.
320,293313,190331,050334,028320,083327,704340,822345,013321,624291,654249,960220,288216,011
VESSELS CLEARED IN FOREIGN TRADE.
[Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce, Department of Commerce.1
192119221921—December.1922—January...
February..MarchAprilMay
Total.
62,635,86464,739,6895,020,6103,986,3314,025,3274,864,4634,884,0905,174,711
American.
30,086,27731,665,6602,434,3092,050,8561,855,9562,180,8682,388,7052,621,206
Foreign.
32,519,58733,074,0292,5S6,3011,935,4752,169,3712,683,5952,495,3S52,553,505
1922-JuneJulyAugustSeptember..OctoberNovember..December..
Total.
5,653,4866,338, 6.120,177,5116,478,7570,136,00*0,214,^24,775,471
American.
2,f»2.Vn4 I3,052,711 '2,WWf423 13,049,976 i3,35S,3G0 I3,440,003 !2,132,16J j
Foreign.
3,3i3,
028,05228.5,941274,0S8
3,428; 7812,2,2(
777,648798,879,643,309
PANAMA CANAL TRAFFIC AND COMMERCE AT SAULT STE. MARIE CANALS.
[Panama Canal and United States War Department, Engineer Corps.]
[Tons, 000 omitted.]
19191920192119221921—December..1922—January....
February...MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember..October. . . .November..December..
Panama Canal traffic.
Total cargotraffic.
7,46810,80910,648
953807838960
1,0461,159978
1,2111,16G1,1381,446
Americanvessels.
2,7565,5114,561
3433603804594996094805S2564543649
Britishvessels.
1,8773,3063,431
349277276287297319268307336372432
Commerce at Sault Ste. Marie Canals.
Totalfreight.
102,34 S105,70S64,33260,067
48,260,254
6393,3178,060
10,23510,28610,98611,2339,4681,838
Eastbound.
32,113,24855,020
938,271
4972,9407,5979,S279,8098,4517,9966,5591,337
Westbound.
16,146,00611,017
1,031,180
142371409408477
2,5353,2372,909
501
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 107: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
242 FEDERAL, RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBBUABT, 1923.
BUILDING STATISTICS.BUILDING PERMITS IN 168 SELECTED CITIES.
[Collected by the 12 Federal Reserve Banks.]NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED.
DistrictNo.l
(14cities).
DistrictNo. 2(22
cities).
DistrictNo. 3(M
cities).
DistrictNo. 4(12
cities).
District DistrictNo. 5 No. 6(15 (14
cities), cities).
DistrictNo. 7(19
cities).
DistrictNo. 8
citfi).
DistrictNo. 9
cities).
DistrictNo. 10
(14cities).
DistrictNo. 11
cities).
DistrictNo. 12
(20cities).
Total(156
cities).
1922—January...February.MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugust.. . .SeptemberOctober...November,December.
8781,0242,3643,0233,4462,943.2,5972,8732,7342,9112,3011,285
4,1764,210
13,2849,056
10,1369,5727,7617,8288,4249,6729,0227,456
1,6232,0813,5574,3863,0913,624
3,0443,8603,1692,5041,639
1,7242,6194,9866,1496,6665,8394,6805,0934,7895,0614,1502,666
2,1882,3054,1014,3975,3214,5093,7564,0183,9973,9303,4332,458
2,1552,5663,2113,2153,4433,0852,9783,1303,1143,3353,0102,070
3,5054,S623,951
11,54613,7W11,89810,38511,11210,55311,9889,4376,620
523517
1,4933,3423,3912,4222,1252,2441,9322,0291,43769S
1,3361,7532,7113,1033,5542,8882,4672,7782,6292,9062,6691,601
1,6532,1142,6232,5862,7942,5452,2382,5342,2232,4702,1841,510
8,2987,600
11,19610,9f>611,26610,1509,41511,59611.29112,25410,4907,7d7
29,59033,09060,69564,41970,76261,98853,72258,60457,91962,23052,68537,453
VALUE OF PERMITS ISSUED.
1922—January. .February.MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober...November,December.
District No.1 (14 cities).
7,380,7019,280,82/
11,089,07714,921,50913,104,96710,600,4509,174,687
16,633,8198,656,4599,159,7318.387,6947,251,931
District No. District No.2 (22 cities), j 3 (14 cities).
50,145,296^50,372,553119,964,783
54,704,29257,843,58573,352,56447,144,023 j49,210,63756,670,10866,062,790 i66,0S3,756 !80,400,408 j
6,878,5238,275,33b
14,116,29217,020,50013,844,81318,177,75915,898,69615,352,65515,868,67013,806,29515,357,32110,639,801
District No.4 (12 cities).
5,713,2097,829,585
13,814,86815,693,18322,614,08422,428,25126,558,68022,036,88225,076,76614,906,54014,712,59813,050,152
District No. District No.5 (15 cities). 6 (14 cities).
8,352,6157,513,54211,329,04911,971,47113,348,59215,736,76615,514,62511,605,15312,969,81211,291,7959,519,32414,486,238
3,734,2624,630,0526,021,2114,951,5587,262,1676,498,6777,516,0367,985,2126,326,0748,048,8805,-124,9025,156,050
District No.7 (19 cities).
18,931,05620,500,53533,898,71435,0X9,30353,806,49949,934,58338,151,18240,452,97231,550,10934,088,48441,424,97853,13 J, 532
1922—January...February-.MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober..,November.December.
District No.8 (4 cities).
2,579,8944,150,4875,012,6076,076,6847,443,8555,855,4595,698,7925,815,8055,384,0426,353,6375,811,979
10,114,761
District No.9 (9 cities).
District No. I District No. District No.10 (14 cities), j 11 (9 cities). 12 (20 cities).
Total (166cities).
2,110,4241,569,7744,526,2098,196,1109,913,8536,020,1867,663,4438,284,6594,761,0654,716,8025,273,1423,685,882
5,023,6034,336,0117,165,9258,384,552
10,807,0848,894,1318,040,6069,793,3528,352,4408,989,0798,277,8716,922,598
4,960,0784,419,7895,630,3366,228,3854,752,6425,276,8195,861,6505,010,2044,980,0574,765,3403,859,9099,570,337
22,872, 87618,917,86827,432,28630,195,05223,271,23829,598,27822,391,01629,424,33223,968,07329,338,15926,200, 47222,034,644
138> 683,337141,795,961200,001,357213,432,599243,013,379252,373,923209,613,436221,605,682204,563,735211,527,532210,033,916'^36,446,400
VALUE OF BUILDING CONTRACTS AWARDED, BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS.[F. W. Dodge Co.J
VALUE OF CONTRACTS FOR ALL CLASBES OF BUILDINGS.
DistrictN o . l .
DistrictNo. 2.
DistrictNo. 3.
DistrictNo. 4.
DistrictNo. 5.
DistrictNo. 7.
DistrictNo. O.i
Total(7 districts).
1922— January «FebruaryMarchAprilMay . . .JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberN ovember *December
1923-January
1922—JanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilHayJuntJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1923—January1 Montana not Included
15,302,45314,799,47628,212 33042,196,91531,689,78336,259,42024,910,92626,780,10329,245,08725,305,05125,297,59919,739,63221,806,227
64,062.84760,152,42490,088,870
117,814,58591,441,14181,614,20579,819,08480,810,92264,298,55665,0(10,95677,700,08158,684,87165,232,664
12,128.90011,828,70024,558,10024,795,80025,739,29426,630,90028,768,37743,818,91124,917,91620,439,85216,929,28918,706,11516,770,003
21,066,28220,602,82329,681,05838,089,75458,432,71446,801,80052,224,00150,811,59634,634,72335,164,63029,337,24023,041,62125,691,021
14,002.39916,518,07924,116,01125,618,12032,268.76730,668,19125,362,18720,983,61922,997,45019,684,62719,848,00415,677,54217,632,808
29,182.32432,344,42458,081,52664,236,56671,117,05577,560,94083,159.79556,954,43462,219,68152,048,24145,428,67345,128,03543,137,028
3,613,1485,192,824
11,933,2709,878,501
12,455,41012,153,0619,304,3268,249,9055,868,2004,523,1264,810,1205,285,2534,524,178
160,258,353161,438,750264,651,165322,630,241323 044,164311 688,517303 548,695288,409,490244,261,613222 226,483219,351,00d191,263,069194,793,929
VALUE OF CONTRACTS FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS.
4,767,5974,179,944
11,897,08613,524,82714,018,30312,518,84012,644,57411,945,45111,509,62713,552,66313,667,23913,962,70814,469,214
35,652.20338,657,15651,116,51453,677,47339,943,54740,483,06333,364,78729,091,73S34.536,71033,237,93651,891,84242.981,47847,701,735
6,280,2005,647,7009,552,500
10,408,700M,16S,SG8 |11,275,5177,826,581 I8,828,607 18,142,367
10,072,2007,397,453
11,526,3725,721,565
6,279,4596,545,073
10,641,17716,127,627
-19,121,79817,434,09515,406,30113,409,25812,736,60513,729,84011,405,40717,809,20211,802,697
6,587.8617,299,6059,796,405
10,297,28013.009,70016,036,7908,074,1636,320,0308,595,7177,416,1087,997,5135,002,9967,814,783
10.601.7619,388,615
17,225,20417,661,58624,574,83528,206,83820,033,34518,833,05015.011,66420,291,37922,307,99417,949,39314,567,012
1,049,594962,757
2,348,5114,175,9634,240,0472,677,1842,415,4382,535,5902,453,7232,227,6142,847,4522,046,3422,071,631
71,228,67571 680,853
U2 577,397125 873 463126 077,158128,032,327100 365,18990|963,78492,986,413100,527,800117,514,900111,278,491104,148,637
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 108: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 243
RETAIL TRADE.Sales of all reporting retailers increased very
substantially during December as a result ofthe heavy Christmas trade. Departmentstores, grocery stores, 5 and 10 cent stores,drug stores, shoe stores, and music stores all re-ported the largest monthly sales for the lastfour years. The accompanying chart illus-trates the heavy Christmas buying at chainstores dealing in musical instruments andcigars, as well as at drug stores wliich do alarge novelty business. Mail-order housesreport a slightly smaller volume of sales thanin November, but business in December wasmuch better sustained than is usual at thattime of the year.
The following tables are a summary of thedata obtained from 474 representative depart-ment stores in the 12 Federal reserve districts.In districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, and 12the data were received in (and averages com-puted from) actual dollar amounts. In dis-tricts Nos* 4, 8, and 10 most of the materialwas received in the form of percentages, andthe averages for the cities and districts com-puted from such percentages were weightedaccording to volume of business done duringthe calendar year 1921.
The tables for the month of December arebased on reports from 25 stores in district No.1 (Boston), 64 stores in district No. 2 (NewYork), 133 stores in district No. 3 (Philadel-phia), 35 stores in district No. 4 (Cleveland),22 stores in district No. 5 (Richmond), 36stores in district No. 6 (Atlanta), 52 stores indistrict No. 7 (Chicago), 20 stores in districtNo. 8 (St. Louis), 21 stores in district No. 9(Minneapolis), 13 stores in district No. 10(Kansas City), 21 stores in district No. 11(Dallas), and 32 stores in district No. 12 (SanFrancisco).
A comparison of monthly changes in activityof different types of retail business sinceJanuary, 1921, is shown in the soxond of thefollowing tables. The 176 department storesare located in districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9,11, and 12, while the mail-order houses dobusiness in all parts of the United States.The United States index for department storesis computed by weighing the districts accord-ing to the buying power, as measured by popu-lation and banking resources. Cham-storefigures are based upon the total sales of thesame Reporting chains for each month, but theactual number of stores in these chains variesslightly.
INDEXNUMBERS
200
180
160
1<tO
1 2 0
1 0 0
8 0
6 0
4 0
2 0
AVERAGE MONTHLY VALUE OF SALES
DRUG CHAINS, CIGAR CHAINS AND MUSIC CHAINS1919-1922
( AVERAGE MONTH, 1919 « 100 )
\£-As""
j
/
h
; ;
• A..... • i\
y
1
\ v
% /
/
i
1RUG CHAINS (7 )GAR CHAINS (3)USIC CHAINS(M
1
T V "
:
- | , • * • * *
\ ••
"a
>nV w V r//
i:rM
I1
INDEXNUMBERS
200
180
160
^ho
120
100
80
60
40
20
° J . F. M. A. M. J . J. A. 5 . 0 . N. D. J . F. M. A. M. J. J. A. S. 0 . N. D. J. F. M. A. M. J. J . A. S. 0 . H. D- J. F. M. A. M. J. J . A . S . 0 . N 0 U
1919 1920 1921 1922
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 109: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
244 FEDERAL EESEBVE BULLETIN. PEBEUARY, 1923.
CONDITION OF RETAIL TRADE IN THE FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS.
[Minus sign (—) denotes decrease.]
Percentage ofoutstanding
orders at close of ,month to total
purchasesduring previouscalendar year.
Percentage ofaverage stocksat close of eachmonth to aver-
age sales forsame month.
Percentage of increase in net salescompared with correspondingperiod previous year.
Percentage of increase in stocks atclose of month compared with—
July 1,1922, toclose of—
Same monthprevious year.
July 1,1922, toclose of—
-14.4-11.8-25.2-15.8-6 ,3-15.9-21.9-16.0
302.0364.3343.6293.7315.3318.5461.3304.1
345.5410.9392.3342.7357.0374.7544.7348.6
16.013.520.210.923.216.914.029.013.5
4SS.6446.9514.7590.1409.6435.3459.9501.3680.1488.1579.1413.0
14.512.020.35.4
15.513.231.014.1
17.518.111.411.517.59.5
21.516.3
16.814.010.34.1
11.48.8
24.612.6
-14.7-16.1-9 .2-19.1-14.9-18.4-19.4-15.8
300.5370.7669.1382.7324.3319.2327.0351.0
330.6358.4903.844S.6364.6365.9404.0372.8
17.018.117.222.218.2
299.3344.3382.5421.3358.6
350.3399.1454.6514.2420.0
16.824,916.219.417.314.015.213.5
474.6361.9697.5367.3420.4563.0459.1428.4
468.1426.4812.0515.5484.2662.4450.5497.2
District No. 1:BostonOutside
District,
District No. 2:New York and BrooklynBridgeportBuffalo.NewarkRochesterSyracuseOutside.
District
District No. 3:PhiladelphiaAllentownAltoonaChester....HarrisburgJohnstownLancasterReading.ScrantonTrentonWilkes-Barre"Williamsport.WilmingtonYorkOutside
District
District No. 4:ClevelandAkronCanton. __CincinnatiPittsburghToledoOutside
District
District No. 5:Richmond.Baltimore.."WashingtonOutside..
District.
District No. 6:Atlanta.BirminghamChattanooga.Nashville....New OrleansSavannahOutside
District.
District No. 7;Chicago.Des MoinesDetroitIndianapolis.Milwaukee..Outside
District.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 110: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
, 1923. FEDERAL BESERVE BULLETIN. 245
CONDITION OP RETAIL TRADE IN THE FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS-Continucd.
(Minus sign ( - ) denotes decrease]
District No. S:St. LouisLittle RockLouisvilleMemphisOutside •
District
District No. 9
District No. 10:Kansas City
OutsideDistrict.... . . . .
District No. 11:DallasFort WorthHoustonOutside
District
District No. 12:San Francisco...Los AngelesOaklandSalt Lake CitvSeattleSpokane. ..*
District..:
United States
Percentage of increase in net salescompared with correspondingperiod previous year.
Perem-bcr.
6.28.31.5
13.45.36.8
11.7
10.0
8.08.9
3.41.60.8
- 5 . 9- 0 . 1
12.014.88.74 2
12.35.0
12.0
iX
Novem-ber.
4.11.86.6
15.73.16.1
10.51.3
- 2 . 02.3
2.46.42.8
- 0 . 80.4
12.318.47 82.1
22.35.1
14.5
9.0
J u l y l , 1922, toclose of—
Decem-ber,1922.
5.0- 2 . 6
0.911.91.14.8
3.8
- 0 . 8
- 1 . 1- 0 . 9
2.91.50.3
- 9 . 1- 1 . 3
8.411.74.41.5
12.7- 1 . 1
8.9
6.5
Novcm-l>ei\1922.
4.7—6.0
1.711.2
- 5 . 34.3
- 2 . 7
- 3 . 6—2.1
0.5- 1 . 4
2.81.50.1
—10.2—1.8
6.910.60 71.1
12.8- 2 . 6
7.7
6.0
Percentage of increase in stocks atcloso of month compared with—
Same monthprevious year.
Decem-ber,1922.
- 0 . 79.2
-16 .8- 0 . 418.1
- 1 . 8
5.8
-13 .9
4.3- 3 . 7
- 3 . 7- 5 . 1—8.3- 7 . 5- 5 . 8
4.46.21 9
—1 47.7
- 1 . 43.8
0.7
Novem-ber,1922.
0.25.7
-15 .4- 2 . 7- 7 . 1- 1 . 9
1.7
- 4 . 1- 1 . 5
4.0- 0 . 1
- 8 . 1- 7 . 4
—11.4-15 .9- 3 0 . 9
- 0 . 8- 7 . 0—3.9
0.93.2
- 0 . 8- 2 . 5
- 0 . 7
Previous month.
Decem-ber,1922.
— 15.3-17 .0- 2 7 . 7— 15.6— 1.8
-16 .3
-15 .6
-24 .7
-10 .0-20 .2
-18 .1-10 .7-18 .2-20 .7- 1 7 . 1
-12 .2- 5 . 5
—10 9— 16.9- 1 7 . 9-14 .1-11 .3
-16 .0
Novem-ber,1922.
2.32.91.26.34.52.7
2.1
- 9 . 22.33.3
- 0 . 8
- 2 . 00.6
- 0 . 91.0
- 0 . 4
2.78.40 72.32.5
- 2 . 13.5
2.2
7Percentage ofaverago stocksat closo of eachmonth to aver-
age sales forsame month.
July 1,1922, toclose of—
Decem-ber,1922.
320.9472.1303.1402.44RS.3349.3
282.5
394.4
457.2420.0
387,2417.2441.1402.3405.7
383.4347.6457.2471.4324.7517.8379.1
319.7
Novem-ber,1922.
360 0443. 2301.04 OS. 053S. 5302.8
300.3
4M.4.r/tf. 3478.3400.1
437. G491.2510.0453.44G4.3
431.03SG. 9545.7538.0393.25S2.5431.0
397.9
Percentage oft outstanding <
orders at closo ofmonth to total
purchasesduring previouscalendar year.
Decem-ber,
1922.
5 44 03.05.55.05.0
7.0
2.0
7.74.9
8.5fl. 56.46.27.5
ao9.3
8.17.9
ao6.6
Novem-ber,1922.
6 05 33.8
12.43.20.4
4.r>
2.711.00.26.8
8.55.83.70.67.2
10.610.8
3.68.2S.09.8
7.4
AVERAGE MONTHLY VALUE OF RETAIL TRADE.
[Average monthly sales, 1919=100.1
• JanuaryFebruary...MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember..OctoberNovember..December..
1919.
January....February...March..AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember.,OctoberNovember..December..
1920.
Depart-ment
stores (176stores).
75.768.985.498.398.193.177.277.696,4
124.6122.1182.7
104.985.4
120.0117.5124.0118.092.290.9
106.9131.9135.9ISO. 7
Mail-orderhouses (4houses).
86.173.182.691.581.374.576.282.1
102.1155.9148.2146.4
120.2122.2130.7107.590.487.3SO. 780.290.5
103.7125.597.9
Chain stores.
Grocery |[21 chains).!
Five andten (4
chains).
S9.78S.495.693.195.490.3
100.993.499.4
US. 8112.0120.0
131.6127.8146.4154.9152.114S.7159.2142.2142.9144.9140.7139.9
70.272.390.893.996.486.387.991.692.5
107.9112.1195.1
85.682.6
111.1110.6112.9108.9112.0111.1111.129.9125.7214.6
Drug (8chains).
Cigar(3chains).
92.383.596.495.194.393.1
100.9101. S98.7
104.7103.9135.3
Shoe (5chains).
115.3108.2117.8110.6116.5117.6124.9121.1120.6124.5115.5150 3
74.877.193.791.7
102.192.298.290.995.2
110.2114.9H9.0
105.8106.2120.4123.2135.6129.6137.3129.2136.6151.0133.9ISO. 5
68.059.676.1
107.5103.292.3SS.5
103.910S.512S.6127.1130.7
90.076.1
121.5133.4146.4123.1119.791.5
111.6143.0135.1154.8
Music (ichains).
05.378.289.786.181.675.776.287.0
105.7133.7127.3193.5
94.795.0
112.991.391.993.981.7
101.6107.7125.6132.1179.1
30425—23 8
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 111: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
246 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBBUABY, 1923.
AVERAGE MONTHLY VALUE OF RETAIL TRADE-Continued.
[Average monthly sales, 1919=100.]
1921.
FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember .December
1922.JanuaryFebruaryMarch...,AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober INovemberDecember
Depart-ment
stores (176stores).
101.687.3
116.3111.7111.310S.579.7S3.292.7
127.8121.3175.8
87.280.0
101.5111.9113.9105.878.484.8
102.5131.2129.418S.2
Mail-orderhouses (4houses).
69.264.895.177.560.262.149.356.472.788.683.380.3
65.359.483.577.169.968.858.457.2
*76.1*110.0*112.5*108.7
Chain stores.
Grocery(21 chains).
126.0120.2131.5122.9120.2119.1116.0122.4121.7137.5135.8148.6
137.5130.3149.2139.2137.9136.7135.1139.1141.0148.6162.4
*165.5
Five andten (4
chains).
86.192.9
121.1111.9112.2109.7108.0116.0113.4141.9134.1241.6
94.6100.8118.4134.9129.6127.0126.3130.4136.1156.6152.3279.2
Drug (8chains).
118.1111.7125.0123.1120.5121.7123.5121.0120.3125.1116.0146.8
117.4114.8123.4120.5123.2123.8126.212S.2128.7133.1122.4161.0
Cigar (3chains).
119.9116.5131.8134.7129.5127.8128.5127.612S.0138.0124.8172.7
111.0109.3124.3124.5
•128.8123.4127.3126.9135.4127.1126.9178.7
Shoe (5chains).
85.782.4
140.8139.5136.3127.5100.886.5
103.0135.3119.0149.4
79.980.6
103.8156.1126.9121.7101.286.7
117.7121.1121.9164.7
Music (4chains).
79.078.381.975.165.159.955.171.682.399.2
107.0172.6
71.875.080.678.980.981.383.099.1
118.2118.8120.7203.7
CONDITION OF WHOLESALE TRADE.PERCENTAGE^OFJINCREASE (OR DECREASE) IN NET SALES IN DECEMBER, 1922, AS COMPARED WITH THE PRECEDING
MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 1922.
District.
No.2No. 3No. 4No. 5No. 6No. 7 ..No.8No.9No. 10 .No. 11No. 12
Groceries.
Percent.
—5.1—7.7
—12.7—9.0- 7 . 4
—12.3-10.7-13.7—14.0—9.9
-22.1
Num-berof
firms.
42612542353315497
1231
Drvgoods.
Percent.
—14.1-23.0-11.7-30.5-34 .6— 16.6-22.6-28.2—21.0-44.2-36.2
Num-berof
firms.
82212152210
Hardware.
Percent.
-11.7—4.2
-10.0—16.8- 0 . 4
—12.16 - 4 . 16;-13.03
112.0
—15.6-10.1
Num-berof
firms.
113410IS22146
129
1021
Shoes.
Percent.
-12.7-14.4
-22.9-30.8—5.420.4
-18.4
-8.7
Num-berof
firms.
1013
2011996
14
Furniture.
Percent.
—23.3—11.0
—0.7—15.5- 7 . 9
Num-berof
firms.
914
32
15
Drugs.
Percent.
—2 8—0 8—0 3
—13 7—2.4—1.6
3.2
—i.8—9 8- 9 . 5
Num-berof
firms.
61610135
103
279
Autosupplies.
Percent.
—1.8
- 2 . 1
Num-berof
firms.
4
20
Stationery.
Percent.
22 8
-22 .8
-11 .2
Num-berof
firms.
6
4
28
Farm im-plements.
Percent.
39.0
22.6—56 6
23 410.7
Num-berof
firms.
6
835
24
Auto tires.
Percent.
40.8
Num-berof
firms.
13
PERCENTAGE OF INCREASE (OR DECREASE) IN^NET^SALES IN DECEMBER, 1922t!;ASACOMPARED WITH DECEMBER, 1921.
District.
No.2No. 3No. 4No.5No. 6No.7No.8No.9No. 10No. 11No. 12
Groceries.
Percent.
26.014.911.39.8
10.48.24.8
11.48.2
22.915.9
Num-berof
firms.
42612542353315497
1231
Drygoods.
Percent.
—6.916.719.941.641.535.529.63.5
17.44.0
18.3
Num-berof
firms.
82212152210663
1115
Hardware.
Percent.
20.118.837.423.527.634.837.436.522.3
1.922.3
Num-berof
firms.
1134101822146
129
1021
Shoes.
Percent.
16.235.9
27.31.7
24 325.074.9
22.7
Num-berof
firms.
1013
2011996
14
Furniture.
Percent.
is.s30.4
36 33.8
31.4
Num-berof
firms.
914
3
1 5 i
Drugs.
Percent.
22.69.36 5
13.012 813 0
—2.5
4 0
Num-berof
firms.
1610135
103
279
Autosupplies.
Percent.
Num-berof
firms.
45 4 i
18.6
Stationery.
Percent.
20 1
Num-berof
firms.
6
44 7 4
i
1"•"JO 8.S 28
Farm im-plements.
Percent.
41 3
194 4115.5159 027.5
Num-berof
firms.
6
835
24
Auto tires.
Percent.
Num-berof
firms.
11.4| 15
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 112: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 247
BANKING AND FINANCIAL STATISTICS.DISCOUNT AND OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS.
VOLUME OF OPERATIONS DURING DECEMBER, 1922.
Federal reserve bank.Bills discounted
for memberbanlrs.
BostonNew YorkPhiladelphia...ClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicago ,St. LouisMinneapolisKansas CityDallas ,San Francisco..
Total—December, 1922..
December, 1921.12 months end-
12 months end-ing Dec. 31,1921 .,
5238,750,4001,853,415,414
246,9.51,464152,581,501223,477,32341,979,297
193,691,021132,224,33915,990,63854,758,85011,494,495
150,277,549
United States securities pur-chased.
Bills bought inopen market.
3,315,592,291 |
4,16S,565,865 |
22,0S2,8S7,C25
57,759,127,585
$28,185,45383,358,5249,681,197
10,070,022170,000
7,639,31921,50S,0055,479,488
275,0005,870,822
30,329,001
Bonds andnotes.
14,777,3707C,910,500
747,80045,20050,000
1,050,95016,017,500
8,8003,466,900
864,250
202,566,831
230,101,353
1,954,687,529
1,534,400,760
103,945,270
36,348,600
1,230,162,770
104,431,850
Certificates ofindebtedness.
$30,267,9oO277,746,60085,2.52,50054,019,00032,000,000
149,000190,405,00070,000,00014,522,50025,767,500
369,00063,000,000
843,495,950
Municipalwarrants pur-
chased.
Total.
December,1922.
$8,000
15,490
435,107,000 !
3,402,677,160
3,742,663,557
176,322
9S4,996
$301,0*1,17.12,291,436,938
342.632.961216,715,723255,697,32350,826,566
421,621,526207,712,62733,995,52881,665,00017,734,317
213,606,550
4,465,626,832
2S,670,591,406
December,1921.
$.150,636,5772,762,980,107339,714,28126*1,689,790217,518,152122,6S6 13230^,820,18312:»,667,2S940,930,91761,590,92545,052,713222,097,653
4,870,434,719
63,141,603,743
VOLUME OF BILLS DISCOUNTED DURING DECEMBER, 1922, BY CLASSES OF PAPER; ALSO NUMBER OF MEMBER BANKSACCOMMODATED.
Federal reserve bank.
BostonNew YorkPhiladelphiaClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolisKansas CityDallasSan Francisco
Total: December, 1922November, 1922
December, 1921November, 1921
Customers'paper
securedby Gov-ernment
obligations.
5270,440539,492
1,718,025392,804528,488210,870241,330304,716
7,853145,74012,92532,311
4,411,0002,681,427
34,494,03641,791,530
Member bank collateralnotes.
Secured byGovernmentobligations.
5112,827,5001,725,654,250
155,679,450111,564,850195,980,93410,448,000
121,712,575109,081,000
6,153,95042,981,0253,353,050
74,381,322
2,6G9,818,5002,40S,641,651
2,643,303,7611,888,859,330
Otherwisesecured.
570,0003,871,200
388,237245,148
724,114
3SO,50015,399,237
21,078,49619,794,940
33,970,54935,352,233
Commercialpaper n. e. s.
Agricul-tural paper.
$125,009, C9S120,202,00589,193,85038,291,86720,153,83020,941,764G3,C54,48G21,092,4S34,507,2006,552,1794,167,206
57,640,900
$505,275416,919318,711203,079
2,302,7923,430,9377,763,8361,307,7103,502,4041,412,5721,600,0051,424,410
583,534,235GS5,308,062
1,370,207,2211,177,681,766
24,314,71620,253,C3S
52,253,70956,521,118
Live-stockpaper.
$28,00010,031
192,17810,2S8139,329
59,7941,034,9913,007,3341,839,8201,172,745
8,100,5107,558,456
17,040,50822,574,035
Bankers' acceptances.
Foreign. Domestic.
571,390
50,849
122,245518,187
$19,S70
19,8704SS.943
Dollarexchange.
2,238,395040,322
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 113: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
248 FEDERAL BESEBVE BULLETIN. F E B R U A R Y , 1 9 2 3 .
VOLUME OF BILLS DISCOUNTED DURING DECEMBER, 1922, BY CLASSES OF PAPER; ALSO NUMBER OF MEMBER BANKSACCOMMODATED—Coutiuued.
Federal reserve bank.
Trade acceptances.
Foreign. Domestic.
Total, allclasses.
Total reduced to a com-mon maturity basis.*
Amount. Per centof total.
Member banks.
Numberin districtDec. 31.
Accommodated.
Number. Percent
Boston.New York $19,000PhiladelphiaCleveland...Richmond...AtlantaChicagoSt. Louis . . . .Minneapolis.Kansas City.DallasSan Francisco.
Total: December, 1922November, 1922
December, 1921..November, 1921.
• $43,487501,00141,422
,866,723623,791419,56073,640318,631
74,923149,839
$238,750,4001,853,415,4142-40,951,4C4152,581,501223.477,32341,979,297193,091,021132,224,33915,990,63S54,758,85011,494,495150,277,549
5285,535,202829,240,275228,454,464205,327,042203,300,133189,341,994602,253,993181,874,234109,289,135177,€82,23576,953,744226,333,840
8.625.06.90.20.15.718.25.53.35.42.36.8
427SOS716SSI032543
1,443610
1,0141,153801S2G
233370305327288237742221343297181209
54.645.851.037.145.643.651.436.233.825.821.032.0
19,000 4,113,677S22,140 3,703,172
10,057,0207,849,920
3,315,592,2913,155,775,616
4,168,565,8653,231,270,854
3,315,592,291 100.0 9,9149,916
9,8559,836
3,8733,859
5,6765,622
39.138.9
57.657.2
i Total discounts multiplied by ratio of average maturity of bills discounted by each bank to average maturity (9.00) for system.
VOLUME OF BILLS DISCOUNTED DURING DECEMBER, 1922, BY RATES OF DISCOUNT CHARGED; ALSO AVERAGE RATESAND MATURITIES.
Federal reserve bank. 4 per cent. 4J per cent. Total. Average rate(365-day basis).
Averagematurity.
BostonNew YorkPhiladelphia..ClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicago ,St. Louis ,Minneapolis...Kansas City...,DallasSan Francisco.,
$238,750,4001,853,415,414
150,277,549
$246,951,464152,581,501223,477,32341,979,297
193,691,021132,224,33915,990,03854,758,85011,494,495
$238,750,4001,853,415,414
246,951,464152,581,501223,477,32341,979,297
193,691,021132,224,33915,990,63854,758,85011,494,495
150,277,549
Per cent,4.004.004.504.504.504.504.504.504.504.504.504.00
Days.10.764,028.32
12.118.18
40.5727.9712.3761.4829.1960.2213.55
Total: December, 1922.November, 1922.
2,242,443,3632,168,771,726
1,073,148,928987,003,890
3,315,592.2913,155,775,616
4.304.29
9.008.43
VOLUME OF BANKERS* AND TRADE ACCEPTANCES PURCHASED DURING DECEMBER 1922, BY CLASSES.
Federal reserve bank.
BostonNew YorkPhiladelphiaClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicagoSt.LouisMinneapolisKansas CityDal las . . . . . .San Francisco
Total: Dec, 1922Nov., 1922
Dec., 1921Nov., 1921
Bankers' acceptances.
Foreign.
$16,842,28960,866,4167,253,8378,630,929
4,432,22613,565.8884,150,509
'4*458,"926'19,301,663
39,502,677123,739,665
155,482,374114,452,173
Domestic.
$10,783,16417,578,8712,077,3601,399,093
170,0003,207,0937,237,1171,103,979
275,000966,902
9,814,503
54,613,08245,448,684
53,331,14637,061,462
Dollarexchange.
$560,0004,520,000
350,00040,000
705*6o6"225,000
"*"445*o66*1,167,300
8,012,3005,275,816
21,079,16910,307,071
Total.
$28,185,45382,965,2879,681,197
10,070,022170,000
7,639,31921,508,0055,479,488
275,0005,870,822
30,283,466
202,128,059174,464,165
229,892,689161,820,706
Trade acceptances.
Foreign.
$393,237
45,535
438,772859,466
208,664177,845
Domestic
54,420
Total.
$.393,237
45,535
438,772913,886
208,664177,845
Total billspurchased.
$28,185,45383,358,5249,681,197
10,070,022170,000
7,639,31921,508,0055,479,488
275,6665,870,822
30,329,001
202,566,831175,378,051
230,101,353161,99S,551
Total reduced to acommon maturitybasis.1
Amount.
517,830,59643,927,05617,620,58816,617,422
208,01810,824,55740,207,9479,152,616
606,7939,927,290
35,643,948
202,566,831
Percent oftotal.
8.821.78.78.2.1
5.319.94.5
.34.9
17.6
100.0
1 Total purchases multiplied by ratio of average maturity of bills purchased by each bank to average maturity (39.14) for system.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 114: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 249
VOLUME OF ACCEPTANCES PURCHASED DURING DECEMBER, 1922, BY RATES OF DISCOUNT CHARGED; ALSO AVERAGERATES AND MATURITIES.
Federal reserve bank. 3 J per cent. 3J per cent. 3 | per cent 3J per cent. 3J per cent. I 3] per cent. 4 per cent. | 4 J per cent.
BostonNew YorkPhiladelphia..ClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolis...Kansas City. . .DallasSan Francisco.
$39,857 $15,678 581,381 |.$1,089,887
S3,9) 5
Total: December, 1922..November, 1922.
39,85710,366
15,67816,483
81,381 i105,928 !
3,91542,540
1.089.8871,564,151
$3,268,3856,975,372
2,557,680
$19,074,18973,232,8658,592,9554,329,249
1,367,460843,639
2,020,08012,1.56,8795,300,419
53,930,3491,911,186775 154
2,956,037170,000973.397
8,327,036148,096
3,389,5595,616,15712,248,698
18,402,50112,701,158
142,571,491123,204,175
173,82113,382,428
Federal reserve bank. 4TV percent.
BostonNewYorkPhiladelphia...ClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolis....Kansas City.. . .DallasSan Francisco..
Total: December, 1922...November, 1922...
4\ per cent.
$147,493
$782,259547,769165,595205,635
180,45130,973
80,8441,214,139
147,493 3,207,6653,608,593
4J percent
$10,000156,489
17,500
82,267
266,256253,547
4i percent
$15,115393,031
3,217,235
275,000
11,510
3,911,8913,157,957
4$ per cent.
$15,2694,8%
20,165
5J percent.
$61,147
Total.
$28,185,4.5383,358,5249,6S1,19710,070,022
170,0007,639,31921,508,0055,47(»,48S
275, (XX)5,870,82230,329,001
61,147 ! 202,560,831, jx 175,373,051
Averagerato (365-
day basis).
Per cent.4.044.074.084.114.184.354.124.06
4.564.064.12
4.114.10
32,747,50430,395,375
Averagematurity.
Daps.24.7620.6371.2464.5947.9055.4773.1865.38
86.3766.1946.00
39.1443.41
i Includes $120,679 and $197,099 of acceptances purchased at 3 and 3 | per cent, respectively.
NOTE.—All Federal reserve banks use 360 days to the year in calculating interest on bills bought in open market.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 115: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
250 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIH. FEBRUARY, 1923.
HOLDINGS OF EARNING ASSETS, BY CLASSES.AVERAGE DAILY HOLDINGS OF EACH CLASS OF EARNING ASSETS, EARNINGS THEREON, AND ANNUAL RATES OF EARNINGS
DURING DECEMBER, 1922.
Federal reserve bank.
Average daily holdings of—
All classesof earning
assets.Discounted
bills.Purchased
bills.UnitedStates
securities.
Earnings on—
Allclassesof earn-
ingassets.
Dis-counted
bills.
Pur-chasedbills.
Annual rate of earnings on—
Statessecuri-ties.
of earning
assets.
Dis-counted
bills.
Pur-chasedbills.
UnitedStatessecuri-ties.
BostonNew YorkPhiladelphiaClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicagoSt.LouisMinneapolisKansas City.DallasSan Francisco
Total: Dec., 1922..Nov., 1922..
Dec., 1921..Nov., 1921..
$119,468,211324,025,628110,653,723139,316,84056 611,47747,853,019159,338,67465,564,84034,164,80972,113,39150,816,955124,505,072
280,853 $27,429,042 $24,758,316 $398,086" 50,053,656 102,363,340 1,067.066
21,114,533 "* '—'--58,768,2011,876,72911,766,32810,851,50912,752,972
$67, ,171,608,63256,263,71651,696,53950,575,13932,931,36693,587,48129,330,51021 479,51030,791,59914,641,96043,373,122
421,35524,106,66541,935 056
33,275,47428,852,1004,159,6093,153,51954,899,68423,481,35812,656,361
395.015484,574208,205175,464556,785233,040126,011
40',900;437j 258,35912,068,330; 171,19239,196,894' 418,911
$228,757582,476215,031197,656193,294125,861357,677112,10883 780118,01157,256147,455
$88,203156,43767,504195,0596,67440,86634,56843,179
1,63379 712138,311
$81,126;328,153!
112,480,91,859:8,237]8,730
164,54077,75342,120138,71534,224133,145
1,304,432,6391,210,125,593
663,560,427 261,076,046 379,765,422 4,492,708 2,419,362623,825,598 259,978,591326,294,504 3,980,435 2,198,846
852,1461,221,082767,2681,014,220
1,517,194,027 1,185,431,602 105,499,1,520,283,2451,232,575,771
05,499,127 226,005,008,6,109,243 5,144,49478,867,348 208,579,059 6,237,929 5,459,506
402,917318,528
Perd.3.923.894.204.094.334.324.114.184.344.223.973.96
Perd.4.004.004.504.504.504.504.504.504.594.514.604.00
Perd.3.793.683.763.914.194.093.753.99
4.563.893.88
Perd.3.863.773.973.752.333.263.533.903.923.993.344.00
4.064.00
560,640 4.74458,803 4.99
4.294.29
5.115.39!
3.843.59
4.504,91
3.793.78
2.922.68
NOTE.—The figures in the first, fifth, and ninth columns include average daily holdings of municipal warrants, earnings, and annual rate ofearnings thereon, as follows: Atlanta, $1,806, $7, and 4.56 per cent; Minneapolis, $28,938, $111, and 4.50 per cent; total, $30,744, $118, and 4.52 per cent.
HOLDINGS OP DISCOUNTED BILLS, BY CLASSES.
[End of December figures. In thousands of dollars.]
Federal reserve bank.
BostonNew York..Philadelphia
Richmond.AtlantaChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolis..Kansas CityDallasSan Francisco
Total: Dec. 30,1922...Nov. 29,1922...
Dec. 31,1921...Nov. 30,1921...
Total.
61,584184,28949,61038,54153,28526,33273,87130,08221,91626,54414,42237,304
617,780650,096
1,144,3461,182,301
Custom*ers'
papersecuredby Gov-ernmentobliga-tions.
78133826878253312030220713
1871275
•3,6183,535
41,51148,896
Member banks*collateral notes.
Securedby Gov-ernmentobliga-tions.
22,894167,89838,60419,12521,5591,996
24,57314,3422,5267,165
6986,792
32$,172311,745
443,722427,464
Other-wise
secured.
311,708
187120
401
2907,298
10,0359,506
17,75217,350
Commer-cial
papern-e.s.
36,77815,18610,13515,77823,96516,55521,97512,6294,1676,2534,734
17,461
185,616225,250
452,331486,313
Agricul-tural
paper.
951477489639
4,5666,539
26,4992,3409,5294,8013,6193,061
63,51069,047
129,037139,164
Live-stockpaper.
38
607139255
148r riot
8,1345,0302,219
21,65525,485
49,67051,715
Bankers' acceptances.
Foreign.
99
101
200282
5055
Domes-tic.
10
120
.130193
288392
Dollarex-
change.
Trade accep-tances.
Foreign.
19
1975
516
Domes-tic.
142272114
1,579815680402406195
439
177
4,8254,978
9,98010,936
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 116: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
PEBBUAKT, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 251
HOLDINGS OF BANKERS' AND TRADE ACCEPTANCES PURCHASED OR DISCOUNTED BY CLASSES OF ACCEPTANCES.
[End of December figures. In thousands of dollars.]
Bankers' acceptances. Trade acceptances.
Federal reserve bank.
BostonNew YorkPhiladelphiaCleveland...RichmondAtlantaChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolisKansas CityDallasSan Francisco
25,54961,25423,49452,5862,54912,10214,90713,441
195406
26,86643,884
25,40760,86423,38051,0071,73411.42214,56513,028
25,40750,86523.3S051,0071,73*11,42214,56513,038
13,89049.OOO14,96442,297
451f>,4419,7159,673
Total : Dec. 30t 1922Nov. 29,1922Dec. 31,1921
277,296254,754155,586
271,274258,103145,383
196,121183,78699,069
65,41065,68434,250
Purchased in open marke t :Dec. 30,1922N o v . 29,1922Dec. 31,1921
272,122259,226145,263 !
270,914257,628145,045
195,9211&3,5O499,919
65,28065,49133,962
Discounted for member banksDec. 30,1922.Nov. 29,1922Dec. 31,1921
HOLDINGS OF BANKERS* ACCEPTANCES PURCHASED OR DISCOUNTED, BY CLASSES OF ACCEPTING INSTITUTIONS.
[End of December figures. In thousands of dollars.]
Branchesand
agenciesof
foreignbanks.
Federal reserve bank.
25,40759,86523,38051,0071,734
11,42214,56513,038
12,98619,3619,390
15,5531,063
.1,5966,7594,580
6,90617,7058,425
18,636526
6,3876,7874 435
3,9369,4542,4G26,761
BostonNew York."PhiladelphiaClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolisKansas CityDallasSan Francisco
271,274258,103145,383
97,25894,06960,210
92,06591,80550,342
38,03632,77813,706
27,05724,63412,319
Total: Dec. 30,1922.Nov. 29,1922Dec. 31,1921.
Purchased In open market:Dec. 30,1922..Nov. 29,1922Dec. 31,1921.
Discounted for member banks:Dec. 30,1922.Nov. 29,1922Dec. 31,1921
270,944257,628145,045
97,12893,73660,173
92,04891,79050,091
38,03632,77813,656
27,01224,62912,319
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 117: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
252 FEDERAL BESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923,
CONDITION OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS.CASH RESERVES, TOTAL DEPOSITS, FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE CIRCULATION, AND RESERVE PERCENTAGES FOR JANUARY,
1923, AND DECEMBER, 1922.
[Daily averages. Amounts in thousands of dollars.]
Federal reserve banks.
Total cash reserves.
January. December.
Total deposits.
January. December.
Federal reserve notesin circulation.
January. December.
Reserve percentages.
January. December.
BostonNew York....;Philadelphia..ClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolis...Kansas City...DallasSan Francisco..
Total....1922-21.1921-20.1920-19.
237,419991,720240,788305,503113,331145,320552,392119,50387,109101,31445,421262,149
217,5401,040,668240,579277,021110,658140,169540,243111,67781,77289,82563,184
262,683
132,490733,291117,858165,48965,24560,829279,84677,42655,17591,55856,334140,176
126,318717,518111,717148,00960,25754,870269,74871,49450,26785,35755,819140,083
198,919564,187204,597233,16893,373121,482400,05489,13357,66067,74335,714222,497
205,408600,336218,185245,797101,149126,993416,25095,77058,66170,46039,559236,947
71.676.474.776.671.479.781.371.777.263. G49.371.1
65.679.072.970.368.677.178.866.875.157.755.869.7
3,201,9693,043,9842,098,4982,164,167
3,166,0192,994,9822,221,5732,149,653
1,981,7171,800,9892,027,8611,825,147
1,891,4571,755,2261,821,7461,990,221
•2,288,5272,272,0572,887,8462,540,642
2,415,5152,416,0963,342,5202,955,476
75.074.7
M4.9
73.571.8
144.7145.7
i Calculated on basis of net deposits and Federal reserve notes in circulation.
RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES OF EACH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK ON WEDNESDAYS, JANUARY 3 TO JANUARY 24, 1923.
RESOURCES.
fTn thousands of dollars.]
Gold and gold certifi-cates:
Jan. 3Jan. 10Jan. 17Jan. 24
Gold s e t t l e m e nfund—F. R. Board:
Jan.3Jan. 10Jan. 17Jan. 24
Gold with F. R.agents:
Jan.3 ,Jan. 10Jan.17Jan. 24
Gold r e d e m p t i o nfund:
Jan.3Jan. 10Jan. 17Jan. 24
Total gold reserves:Jan.3Jan. 10Jan. 17Jan. 24 . „ ,
Reserves other thangold:
Jan. 3Jan.10Jan.17Jan. 24
Total reserves:Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17Jan. 24
Total.
272,504281,300296,840298,207
550,126543,591535,229556,642
2,165,6272,186,1942,195,4742,181,121
61,19451,87349,94944,167
3,049,4513,062,9581,077,492080,137
113,319124,509136,0-15141, $44
1,162,7701,187,467!, 214,137
221 9S1
Boston
16,17416,73116,85217,002
33,34529,12242,39336,210
158,528169,452169,523166,427
10,0588,1806,8078,547
218,105223,485235,575228,186
8,7S28,5518,5278,944
226,887232,036244,102237,130
NewYork.
117,648123,104137,326137,169
198,387204,557161,205158,883
658,892658,705648,474645,604
9,5888,060
10,6778,324
984,515994,426957,682949,980
29,05530,62S28,74627,468
:, 013,5701,025,054
9S6 428977,448
Phila-delphia.
19,60119,92820,49820,840
23,00515,82620,68526,100
180,438185,004181,943176,644
7,5653,8456,2403,172
230,609224,603229,366226,756
15,37913,30215,51815,148
245,988237,905244 884241,904
Cleve-land.
13,34913,62513,81413,874
65,84872,15376,03893,531
192,314192,576197,944198,279
6,1956,0173,2112,476
277,700284,371291,007308,160
6,2878,2399,86910,847
283,993292,610300,876319,007
Rich-mood.
6,8615,9256,1676,404
22,09020,84325,57731,155
63,35966,31469,24967,348
4,8723,7711,8362,005
97,18296,853102, S29106,912
8,43610,83211,55S12,230
105,618107,685114,387119,142
At-lanta.
5,6355,7425,8285,879
18,54919,77121,94923,489
103,568107,624106,919105,134
2,0971,76S1,5602,179
134,849134,905136,256136,681
4,6316,3158,0838,848
139,480141,220144,339145,529
Chicago.
51,08851,13051,41251,788
58,63651,93359,63962,146
411,802411,660415,863415,183
5,0103,7724,6S03,540
526,536518,495531,594532,657
20,85922,98225,79926,471
547,395541,477557,393559,128
St.Louis.
2,7962,9902,8763,045
28,67522,76021,14314,733
75,49279,67081,60581,409
2,7343,7613,632
109,697109,181109,259102,047
8,83911,23913,22615,506
118,586120,420122,485117,553
Minne-apolis.
7,5147,5757,6527,690
24,54123,78927,18431,709
46,37247,42448,31447,673
3,3233,8362,4952,661
81,75082,62485,64589,733
5S76729S46.56
S2,33783 29686,62990,389
KansasCity.
2,7352,8162,836
30,96337,99133,44134,209
51,65553,14558,44860,375
2,4762,4012,4832,764
.87,783.96,272.97,188.100,184
2,7392,9333,6024,70S
90,52299,205100,790104,892
Dallas.San
Fran-cisco
10,114 I11,152 '11,15511,176
8,79910,40910,89711,787
19,68418,680IS, 47315,319
1,6001,8S31,8681,562
40,13742,12442,39339,844
.4,6324,6175,5956,093
44,82946, 77147,98845,937
19,03520,66320,44420,504
37,28834,43735,07832,690
198,523195,940198,716201,726
5,6764,5794,4604,077
260,522255,619258,698258,99
3,0434,1695,1384,925
263,565259,785263,836263,922
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 118: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 253
RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES OF EACH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK ON WEDNESDAYS, JANUARY 3 TO JANUARY 24, 1923-Con.
RESOURCES.
[In thousands of dollars. ]
Nonrcscrve cash:Jan. 3Jan.10Jan. 17Jan. 24
Bills discounted:Secured by U. S.
Governmentobligations—
Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17Jan. 24
Other bills dis-counted—
Jan. 3Jan. 10Jan.17Jan. 24
Bills bought in openmarket:
Jan.3Jan. 10 ,Jan.17Jan. 24
tf, S. bonds andnotes:
Jan.3 ,Jan. 10 ,Jan.17Jan. 24
U. S. certificates ofindebtedness:
Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17Jan. 24
Municipal warrants:Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17Jan. 24
Total earning assets:Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17..Jan. 24
Bank premises:Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17Jan. 24
Five per cent re-demption fundagainst F. R. banknotes:
Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17Jan. 24
Uncollected items:Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17Jan. 24
All other resources:Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17Jan. 24
Total resources:Jan.3Jan.10...Jan.17Jan. 24
Total.
94,56592,16582,17876, 013
351,483281 9962S4.017341,454
276,162230,053229,328228,281
255,182225,760201,335204,547
182,315175,709156,878166,857
274,239332,467255,554185^962
3924104
1,339,4201,246,0091,1271221,127,105
45,28145,52145,89546,400
2,097911311310
770,070606,28S653,495580,151
15,50614,89415,32915, 497
5,429,7095,193,255" 138,467
067,487
Boston.
12,52314,02711,50010,912
20,88515,33414,35220,985
30,77522,89830,64228,305
23,62719,90616,18318,319
6,3126,8906,0206,556
34,49431,80622,07922,622
NewYork.
Phila-delphia.
116,09396,83489,27696,787
4,4344,4344,4344,434
422
72,66053,40955,33446,140
319344371397
433,338401,084405,023395,800
11,53012,8559,5128,95*
169,695154,575161,502191,283
15,8S913,27721,23125,358
51,79637,72429,39432,066
44,16436,68418,82929,933
77,205109,79591,22066,917
358,749352,055322,176345,557
10,10010,10110,10110,478
2,7374,4213,3372,627
38,03332,62532,30033,784
10,0106,9497,4067,379
21,91020,07421,51025,614
24,35024,34424,60724,798
9,75015,2564,6074,593
104,05399,24890,43096,168
640640660660
I
178,108123,186145,874124,0S1
2,0882,0432,1732,215
1,574,1451,525,2941,476,2941,468,737
68,07450,39056,88649,368
392416453478
421, SS4393,020396,650391,205
Cleve-land.
8,5556,S037,4055,010
24,33914,25215,08619,063
24,70414,27010,81310,099
50,06546,64143,14841,123
11,89711,86211,86212,326
36,86233,90326,89414,008
147,867120,928107, S0396,619
7,0057,2027,3687,439
Rich-mond.
3, 7074,4784,1083,718
19,82415,40713,15915,481
29,65927,51221,70323,75S
1,519962759706
1,2911,2911,3411,341
5,0008,0004,500
57,29353,17244,46241,286
2,6172,6172,6172,617
82,60456,8S265,95S56,939
5S9673707754
530,613485,098490,1774S5,798
59,60054,18657,62757,192
635455416450
229,470222,593223,617224,405
At-lanta.
9,53010,8239,5029,791
1,7642,1882,0552,472
20,6S720,33518,74220,149
10,8979,8758,1087,199
31330213639S
9,0319,1402,0312,031
Chicago. , ^ i s .
48,69241,84031,07232,249
1,9601,9642,0602,0G0
468 i
f
12,3111535t13,01412,594
31,21022,10523,42029,232
,40,5-1542,37237, 50838,148
10,09816,0559,85010,039
7,0337,3927,0266,716
49,16263,35358,87841,899
150,684151,277136,742126,034
8,2S88,2888,3058,30G
665665
25,928 ! 93,92923,797 1 75,03925,891 ! 80,45326,297 | 72,199
2S9305351 |290
6S3724939977
226,353 ! 813,985219,949 : 792,824213,575 \ 797,511216,216 ; 779,302
f>f4S75,0S24,717
13,1827,2827,3728,820
13,4877,8376,0025,975
12,77813,82014,92015,228
16,76516,86017,97218,218
7,7Sl8,8456,4786,025
63,99354,65052,75054,266
911911919919
Minne-apolis.
2,209a, 2053, («Ti2,302
2,4131,GS61,0501,073
IK, 83317,S7917,32217,529
11,81012,31410,8138,295
5,4953,495495495
392-i104
38,60135,39829,69027,390
943946978978
196
44,073 ! 18,55938,64740,32035,704
1,015460503524
15,30115,35914,293
1,8441,8311,7951,642
234,632 144,659220,575 ", 139,977222,059 i 137,485213,713 | 137,065
KnnsasCity.
4,9715,1784,6024,523
15,9788,3802,9544,768
18,75510,00010,09513,804
4021118585
27,52527,51920,92G20,931
17,63015,59516,59311,593
Dallas.
80,29368,27162,65357,181
4,7024,7024,7314,731
200200200200
50,25941,60440,40637,047
1,077996943912
232,027220,156214,3S5209,486
4,2004, $104, S975,825
1,0741,7001,0991,025
13,35213,64014,5S315,089
25,13223,5052-2,08221,308
2,6292,6293,7293,729
10,67911,1208,6298,029
SanFran-cisco.
10,1904,7185, OGS4,910
13,0500,45tf9,00812,803
27,40126,4182-1,22122, OSS
40,95837,08035,20032,800
27,r.l727,61627,61727,616
11,1.1022,15013,1507,150
52,80652,61050,72250,440
1,9371,9371,9371,937
146464646
32,16528,40726,54022,304
1,9191,9181,9401,940
13S, 062136,505134,070128,429
120,236-119,726109,346103,122
1,7441,7791,7851,841
44, 11145,44042,8473S,5S2
4,6564,7294,7384,91$
450, 511436, ISO427,620417, 331
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 119: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
254 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 1923.
RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES OF EACH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK ON WEDNESDAYS. JANUARY 3 TO JANUARY 24, 1923—Con.
LIABILITIES.
[Tn thousands of dollars.]
Total. Boston.NewYork.
Phila-delphia.
Cleve-land.
Rich-mond.
At-lanta. Chicago. St.
Louis.Minne-apolis.
KansasCity. Pallas.
SanFran-cisco.
Capital paid in:Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17Jan.24
Surplus:Jan.3Jan.10Jan. 17Jan.24
Deposits:Government—
Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17Jan. 24
Member bank—r e s e r v e ac-count—
Jan.3 . . : . . . .Jan.10Jan.17Jan. 24.. . . . .
Other deposits-Jan. 3Jan.10Jan.17Jan. 24
Total deposits:Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17Jan. 24
F. R. notes in actualcirculation:
Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17Jan. 24...
F. U. bank notes incirculation—net lia-bility:
Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17Jan. 24
Deferred availabilityitems:
Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17Jan.24
All other liabilities:Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17Jan.24
Total liabilities:Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17Jan. 24
MEMORANDA.
Ratio of total reservesto deposit and F. R.notes liabilities com-bined—per cent:
Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17Jan.24
Contingent liabilityon bills purchasedfor foreign corre-spondents:
Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17Jan.24
107,450107,465107,484107,648
218,369218,369218,369318,369
6,6306,1939,341
33,042
1,942,7491,960,3461,918,4631,924,521
75,39453,33741,64233,263
2,024,7732,019,8761,969,4511,990,826
2,411,0582,312,6742,256,4912,221,316
2,9472,8603,1173,132
655,632521,667573,705515,000
9,58010,3389,85011,196
,429,709,193,255,138,457,067,487
71.373.676.176.5
33,91233,91333,94133,928
8,1208,1278,1238,123
16,31216,31216,31216,312
73362709
4,240
127,649129,267128,061127,214
9,5753,4661,68S1,134
137,297133,095130,458132,588
207,208201,717197,663195,086
64,13941,57152,19443,331
202262273360
433,333401,0*4405,023395,800
65.969.374.472.4
2,5112,4742,4742,474
28,68828,69028,73728,737
59,80059,80059, SOO59,800
241376795
6,369
741,929762,804711,692722,717
12,285ll,S2011,44310,856
754,455775,000723,930739,912
597,350565,213552,218545,265
131,99294,253109,51292,055
2,3382,0972,938
,574,145,525,294,476,294,468,737
75.076.577.376.1
12,13012,46612,49412,475
9,3279,3279,3279,332
18,74918,74918,74018,749
574761511
3,992
114,912113,878113,349115,918
5,7392,478.1,9821,041
121,225117,117115,842120,951
212,917204,617202,412197,481
11,71211,71611,71611,711
23,49523,49523,49523,495
76565f>628
2,491
161,643151,715162,164163,669
14,0628,0944,4852,861
176,470160,465167,277169,021
242,859238,215229,016228,464
5,5975,5975,5975,607
11,28811,28811,28811,28S
83382440
1,181
62,85963,29061,76966,326
518814518271
61,21064,18662,72767,778
98,49903,89992,10490,582
4,3104,3104,2594,345
8,942*,9428,9428,942
319516572
2,222
59,06259,30654,97955,623
5,8483,0121,276851
65,22962,83456,8275S,696
126,325122,950120,164118,718
14,77814,77814.77514,845
30,39330,39S30,39830,398
1,5288S6999
2,270
269,917276,817284,166278,777
2,1722,44S2,4601,955
273,617280,151287,6252S3,002
419,333406,056395,522389,307
4,8294,8304,8304,837
9,6659,6659,6659,665
224424525
3,116
78,17173,75876,34970,739
2,3641,6551,165765
SO,75975,83778,03974,620
93,91SS9,533S3,145S6,419
59,40842,87949,97244,237
258331348455
421,884393,020396,650391,205
73.673.976.976.0
2,7522,7112,7112,711
75,29250,41357,93452,313
7S57947397S9
530,613485,098490,177485,798
67.773.475.980.3
2,8152,7733,7732,779
49,46047,17951,48348,700
416444418450
229,470222,593223,617224,405
64.968.173.975,2
1,6861,6611,6611,661
20,89720,27422,77524,880
65063960S629
226,353219,949213,575216,216
72.876.081.683.0
1,2331,2201,3301,220
130185
74,85560,34668,05360,510
1,004l,0G51,0081,055
813,985792,824797,511779,302
79.078.9ftl.683.2
4,0934,0334,0334,033
44,74540,00540,69237,453
716705688719
234,632220,575222,059213,713
68.072.873.773.0
1,6171,5931,5931,593
3,5353,5333,5783,57$
7.4737,4737,4737,473
436342874
2,330
50,94849,37249,38850,306
4,8355,57S4,0742,469
56,21955,29254,&3655,105
59,53958,74257,60456,39S
17,10814,11313,68413,676
S15824811835
144,689139,977137,486137,065
71.173.077.481.1
929915915915
4,6234,6174,6204,014
9,4889,48R9,4SS9,48S
4081,1811,236773
S4,96S83,37780,96880,449
11,6007,7095,5975,3S4
96,97692,26787,80186,606
70,32868,53267,21566,701
2,1772,0922,2042,185
48,00342,67942,65439,457
4,1954,1954,1774,182
7,4967,4967,4967.496
191452670
1,079
52,19255,22755,63754,254
2,0871,8101,600711
64,470"57,48957,90756,044
38,59536,78235,35334,437
770774.783762
31,09828,29726,84523,976
432 1,438481 1,472403 1,509435 1,532
232,027220,156214,385209,486
54.161.765.068.4
1,6511,6271,6271,627
138,062136,505134,070128,429
48.249.651.550.8
S94881881881
7,7367,7457,7457,737
15,26315,26315,26315,263
1,038155
1,3S22,979
13S,499141,535139,946138,529
4,3094,4535,3.544,965
143,846146,143146,682146,473
244,187226,338219,075212,458
3S, 53539,65837,90734,401
944983948
.999
450,511436,180427,620417,331
67.969.772.173.5
1,5961,5591,5591,559
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 120: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL EESEItVE BULLETIN. 255
MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OF BILLS, CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS, AND MUNICIPAL WARRANTS HELD BY T H E 12FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS COMBINED.
[In thousands of dollars.]
Bills discounted:Jan. 3Jan.10Jan.17Jan. 24.
Bills bought in open market:
Jan. 10.Jan. 17Jan. 24
United States certificates of indebtedness:Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17Jan.24
Municipal warrants:Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17Jan. 24
Total.
627,645512,019513,345569,735
2,55,182225,760201,335204,547
274,239332,46725-5, ,55118-5,9G2
3924104
Within 15days.
443,297353,518307,072421,946
97,52472,45262,98871,673
100,38.5145,78775,71013,970
2G176
16 t o 30days . .
43,82634,07831,09531,576
4-% 01948,56147,22941,930
5,914
31 to 60days.
01,39951,69048,2S952,300
as, 30961,8915.5,60452,446
71,27270,507
6544
61 to 90days.
49,55043,33938,84830,641
37, ISO35,37528,62829,204
66,61081,919
"14*607*
61
Over 00days.
29,57328,82427,44127,272
7,1207,4810,8869,294
107,23S104,701102,05880,918
1
FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.FEDERAL RESERVE AGENTS' ACCOUNTS ON WEDNESDAYS, JANUARY 3 TO JANUARY 24, 1923.
[In thousands of dollars.]
Net amount of F. It.notes receivedfrom Comptrollerof the Currency:
Jan. 3Jan. 10Jan.17Jan. 24
F. K. notes on hand:Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17Jan.24
F. R. notes outstand-ing:
Jan .3 . .Jan. 10Jan.17Jan. 24
Collateral securityfor F. R. notes out-standing:
Gold and goldcertificates-
Jan. 3Jan. 10Jan.17Jan. 24
Gold redemp-tion fund-
Jan. 3Jan. 10Jan.17Jan. 24
Gold fund, F.R.Board-
Jan. 3Jan. 10Jan.17Jan. 24
Eligible paper-Amount re-
quired—Jan.3..1 .Jan.10...Jan.17..Jan. 24..
E x c e s samountheld-
Jan.3.. .Jan. 10...Jan.17...Jan. 24...
Total.
3,683,6573,650,3033,620,4383,588,873
873,403902,598928,927934,748
2,810,2542,747,7052,691,5112,654,125
353,462352,462342*, 462339,809
130,431122,87613i,719133,647
1,681,7341,710,8561,718,2931,707,665
644,627661,511496 037473 004
206,123132,105189 362273 801
Boston.
308,815304,739299,810296,714
80,70084,90086,70084,700
228,115219,839213,110212,014
15,30015,30015,30015,300
15,22811,15216,22313,127
128,000143,000138,000138,000
69,58750,33743 58745 587
5,7007,751
17,59022,022
NewYork.
1,178,2481,168,9411,157,0011,148,519
398,690398,690398,690398,690
779,558770,251758,311749,829
283,184283,184273,184270,531
34,70834,52134,29034,073
341,000341,000341,000341 000
120,666111,545109,837104,225
91,09575,91786,580
124,226
Phila-delphia.
290,726287,2912S3,230277,932
48,92047,52055,52059,520
241,806239,771227,710218,412
7,0007,0007,0007,000
12,54914,11515,05414,755
160,8163,8159,8154,8
61,368€4,76745,76741,768
5,845507
5,22420,055
Cleve-land.
305,251299,713296,082292,817
31,34034,14038,39041,490
273,911265,573257,692251,327
13,27513,27513,27513,275
14,03914,30114,66915,004
165,000165,000170,000170,000
81,59772,09759,74853,048
16,1151,9818,167
16,990
Rich-mond.
138,618136,573134,503132,607
27,26029,20031,26031,360
111,358107,313103,248101,247
3,5641,5192,4543.553
59,79564,79566,79563,795
47,99940 99933,09933,899
2,1512,0343,7384,806
Atlanta.
210,487209,043207,338205,553
78,24980,74482,00480,849
132,233128,299125,334124,704
2,4002,4002,4002,400
6,16S4,7245,5198,734
100,000100,50099,00094,000
23,67020,67518,41519,570
15,616U 71710,48110,245
Chicago.
551,257549,115549,31854S,63S
83,76087,96092,00094,500
467,497461,155457,318454,078
16,15316,01614,21814,539
395,644395,644401,045400,644
55,69549,49541,45533,895
38,16130,98829,2633S,524
St.Louis.
130,897135,075134,513132,814
22,74026,54026,14020,140
114,157103,535108,373100,674
11,78011,78011,78011,780
4,2124,3904,8284,129
59,50063,50065,00065,500
SS,66528,86526,76525,265
78269
1,5354,75S
Minne-apolis.
KansasCity.
73,52372,57573,52572,884
10,3109,06512,11012,210
63,21363,51061,41560,G74
13,05213,05213,05213,052
1,3201,3722,2621,621
32,00033,00033,00033,000
16,84116,08613,10113,001
3,3602,7894,7045,105
98,29197,78197,OSG96,012
20,00021,36021,36021,3G0
78,23170,42175,72674,652
Dallas.
4,2953,7853, OSS4,015
47,3G049,38055,35050,360
26,57623,27617,27814,277
8,5591,8811,8564,3S0
00,33759,83359,12758,473
17,90418,34419,04420,744
42,43341,48940,08337,729
7,4716,4716,4716,471
2,7132,7092,5022,84S
9,5009,5009,5006,000
22,74922,S0921,61022,410
SanFran-cisco.
331,207329,621328,900325,910
53,47064,07565,70963,125
277,737265,549203,191262,785
15,47714,27219,61217,249
1S3,O46181,668179,104184,477
79,21469,60964,47561,059
16,561 i 2,17715,870 i 30116,620 ! 3,60415,548 7,142
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 121: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
256 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUABY, 1923.
CONDITION OF MEMBER BANKS IN LEADING CITIES.PRINCIPAL RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES OF MEMBER BANKS IN LEADING CITIES ON WEDNESDAYS, FROM DECEMBER 27,
1922, TO JANUARY 17, 1923.
ALL REPORTING MEMBER BANKS IN EACH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT.
[In thousands of dollars.]
Total. Boston. NewYork.
Phila-delphia.
Cleve-land.
Rich-mond. Atlanta, Chicago. St.
Louis.Minne-apolis.
KansasCity. Dallas.
SanFran-cisco.
Number of reporting banks:Dec. 27Jan.3Jan.10Jan. 17
Loans and discounts, gross:Secured by U. S. Gov-
ernment obligations-Dec. 27Jan.3Jan. 10Jan. 17
Secured by stocks andbonds—
Dec. 27Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17
All other loans and dis-counts—
Dec. 27Jan.3Jan. 10Jan. 17
Total loans and discounts:Dec. 27Jan.3Jan.10Jan. 17
U. S. bonds:Dec. 27
U. S. pre-war bonds:Dec. 27Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17
U. S. Liberty bonds:Dec 27Jan.3.Jan.10Jan. 17
XJ. S. Treasury bonds:Dec. 27Jan.3Jan.10Jan. 17
TJ. S. Victory notes andTreasury notes:
Dec. 27Jan.3 ,Jan. 10 ,Jan. 17
U. S. cerificates of indebted-ness:
Dec. 27Jan.3Jan. 10Jan. 17
Other bonds, stocks, andsecurities:
Dec. 27Jan.3Jan. 10Jan. 17
Total loans, discounts, andinvestments:
Dec. 27Jan.3Jan. 10....Jan.17
Reserve balance with F. R.banks:
Dec. 27Jan.3Jan.10Jan. 17.....
782783781781
290,261305,90a304,307296,581
3.774,7753,909,3923,786,6213,811,55c
7,263,94,7,382,1877,387,4997,387,560
11,328,97711,597,48411,478,42711,495,696
1,485,007
16,82116,74116,45916,287
104106106106
95,117106,358108,050105,534
248,1411,715,780247,2591,858,419241,4991,711,575247,3531,716,641
565,2712,239,802592,989 2,293,977594,178 2,315,670598,646 2,305 648
830,233 4856,— "852,862,
,8 ;1136 4;5 286 4;
100,718
275,280278,974279,442
12,47512,77512,775
1,083,8861,082,1181,081,531
80,32379,90582,610
19,84120,32420,32319,782
245,145251,320255,536242,247
327,432323,060326,558329,666
31,98731,88631,22331,537
379,144364,038376,137367,791
644,843642,497642,828648,112
i, 050,699:, 263,754,135,295,127,823
592,249
592,418,1,055,97'594,7041,038,421602,4171,050,188591,6951,047,440
63,080
43,87848,90448,034
11,49311,34311,343
486,784486,031487,102
47,42847,60948,403
175,008
12,62112,15711,47811,778
123,281125,941126,833127,352
323,478316,376313,110312,641
454,474451,421451,771
65,367
7,7008,0757,756;
57,09856,28655,67957,794
109109108108
46,45849,29049,30645,683
539,093544,665553,517573,258
19,93319,73219,56118,471
140,621138,757140,481142,578
335,341,333,332,
0331649117617651
,023,649 297,447,086,578! 295,253,077,261 297,7401,073,216 300,217
399,8311,609,200 458,001406,0101,680,533 453,742396,6111,680,084 457,782398,1431,692,157
30,587 142,342
47,18347,11247,486
30,49129,97129,971
13,85914,33614,543
23,42423,22323,481
118,635119,606120,778
30,62930,81730,962
13,23612,72311,144
461,266
50,263
8,0018,4087,9448,061
45,30945,93145,15445,495
194,077189,500194,128200,909
247,387243,839247,226254,465
29,262
10,73310,4609,9429,760
74,50773,50375,50076,166
364,059359,448355,702353,854
449,299443,411441,144439,780
62,941
4,7026,2785,9465,950
52,06349,46649,60450,217
211,100206,098206,146205,616
267,865261,842261,696261,783
34,520
66666666
16,34716,19616,31916,154
154,593153,807155,106164,663
737,750729,762731,002726,270
899,765902,427907,087
138,670
15,41215,35415,354
8,939 12,3648,2481 12,0948,811 12,032
108,089 26,189105,752 26,596103,391! 25,939
19,05619,11819,118
31,70636,49636,444
18,53819,378'18,960
45,19145,92746,148
15,18015,01713,144
93,66492,75792,950
145.676143,105149,653
825,736786,552792,671940,489
237,956209,857196,953210,543
2,274,1452,232,0722,193,6832,203,583
.6,151,821
.6,330,807
.6,165,93116,360,937
1,393,7551,457,9311,473,072'1,433,712
8,6088,5128,842
27,68028,49727,58835,942
5,1345,3155,384
12,095
171,120173,284173,881172,428
50,92448,77648,446
461,471458,188466,046523,110
124,526H3,301104,484113,408
757,335766,779761,875758,691
:, 134,885 5,986,280.,165,4916,188,608,,160,1816,051,4111,186,9786,106,614
85,01785,93489,070
639,948668,380694,794
88,0261 641,873
4,9315,1585,103
41,28241,05044,93962,587
7,0983,5772,0243,141
182,679183,650183,535187,510
886,557883,833897,025909,782
70,33374,05970,07469,402
11,0769,2749,494
49,06448,86048,53456,481
14,97614,76417,69216,019
293,444299,772294,152295,055
1,588,4661,578,7111,586,5581,592,753
103,017121,351101,341114,376
4,7944,8374,957
6,2946,180
14,084
3,7453,0102,8123,084
54,94655,50053,81053,043
591,264585,192579,848587,852
35,83337,51037,42735,418
2,2442,0792,885
7,2796 2046,2317,064
8,1457,0917,9096,316
35,64536,43533,40637,588
27,20026,85033,341
122,07892,21090,158
114,124
30,78229,50828,18128,568
432,776360,799354,116357,259
481,487 2,337,178485,079 2,321,763473,29512,308,364477,6832,352,321
34,814 195,35535,862 198,27736,434 205,83533,4241 211,893
10,51110,71210,896
20,07920,06719,75125,226
5,5725,2694,2463,528
88,23489,53683,70787,287
622,149620,726618,148629,496
43,05244,23743,05447\170
3,2482,8341,917
12,01115,26115,21120,683
6,0391,6421,2441 903
30,04228,85029,042
323,588321,509322,991335,811
5,2645,9235,337
20,04818,75519,06221,958
7,0384,7924,7264,180
60,28961 98761,26459,403
599,615591,764590,140588,888
2,7294,2294,045
16,44313,37412,88714,866
6,8676,5836 1545,181
14,14713,92114,360
8,9559,1118,8608,523
22,123 47,91124,665 51,53522,929 49,82622,9201.47,921
334,650327,875327,961326,6601
25,05824,27427,24727,695
40,47537,79236,08444,364
18,03415,00512,09713,140
159,833165 177156,227157,754
1,265,7021,257,2561,250,0091,266,099
90,29491,84794,14193,594
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 122: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 257
PRINCIPAL RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES OF MEMBER BANKS IN LEADING CITIES ON WEDNESDAYS, DECEMBER 27,
1922, TO JANUARY 17, 1923-Continucd.
ALL REPORTING MEMBER BANKS IN EACH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT-Continucd.
[In thousands of dollars.]
Cash in vault:Dec. 27Jan.3..Jan.10Jan.17
Net demand deposits:Dec. 27Jan.3Jan.10Jan. 17
Time deposits:Dec. 27Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17
Government deposits:Dec. 27Jan.3Jan,10Jan.17
Bills pavable and redis-counted with F. R. banks:
Secured by U. S. Gov-ernment obligations-
Dec. 27Jan.3 ,Jan. 10Jan.17
All other-Dec. 27Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17
Total.
35S, 449320,250317,412200,124
11,255,42511,527,35011.595,70211,599,541
3,708,4663.748.20S3,715,3203,735,272
471,209351,373185,941298, 012
200,253253,784195,150198,769
163,322136,41194,14697,292
Boston.
22,59121,10420,72519,139
S13,832849,070 V, 018!852,742850,301 4j 970; 014 710,771
237, 567240,037241,554239,842
21,09016,1378,003
20,097
10,6039,2485,5725,5S0
36,82923,74010,42024,298
NewYork.
Phila-delphia.
114,083 20,00102,30-1 17,65393,840 17,01485,0321 10,70S
1,901,010 ft9S,0S9•,018,2001 704,381
,005,595| 729,571
764,230769,864772,351760,529
240,240183,10197,671
131,227
102,034148,809137, OH143,804
13,88110,4588,925
17,017
58, 85763,65704,90705,84S
29,9092L5S011 51520,943
17,37816,77812,82013,601
Cleve-land.
Rich-mond.
3S,O7S 16,57,30,813 16,01534,367i 14,01531,029! 14,173
85s , i9 .T r ,n«877,4211 346,231014.310: 340,702031, MM 349,867
Atlanta.
11,71412,08211,08310,612!
Louis,
I
9,78110,3 JOS, 4577,653
7,205 13,900' 11,1740,874! 13,2.11 [ 11,0186.972 13,012i 10,3246,307 11,770! 9,33*
502,241!569,7S1:
M l , 8425-13,483
30,49226,07314, .06015,0-10
14", 010140,1*92148,102148,351
0,9*37,2703,928
12,833
15,400 17,20713,114 12,4514,400 8,-5380,352 5,976
9,540' 10,3186,079| 19,0543,516[ 9,0184,523 5,S21
17,77517,01715,01212,428
271,310 1,407, <W 365,5722*4,412 1,493,002 375,142,290,6*21,490,914: 3S4,fil4'286,240.1,522,3411 380,1 Si |
101,505!101,084148,2-19160,306
11.7498,6724,4017,418
40972303192
10,38111,5036,7505,793
741,470, 170,37074r,,lO7| 179,973!
74 H, 002 180,000!75O,715j 181,951
50,012! 11,91530, S77j 8,83010,049 4,74O!
38,927 10,065
207,6522(W KSTij212,6771218,2011
81,320;85,4511Mi, 07280,178!
15,11018 24710,00212,410
23,12S12,7289,9707,104
9, mi7 2561,7751,430
8,8369,0003,44S1,330
0,833}4,759|2, IKS8 140
441,711 235,014445,340 237,010451,200 245,9614r/»0SS 241,277
1123,436! 70,527123,619' 70,053124,3S6 71,439121,2«». 72,0S4
8,0*>4l 13,4025,815! 10,0253,021' 5,7373,0501 5,120
KanFran-cisco.
21,01723,9^72,1,1742 2 4 V
05.1,20s017,245604,.'is I(iGS, S57
.176,210581,000587, OK3f»S0,705
25,27»
o! 82017,931
1,013 8,1 SO! 'MU\ 8,0751,30s H,oor 400; 11,1071,921 6,910 1,050: 3,813323' 1,013: 1,«JOJ 0,362
2,700|2,900!2,1001
1,605
8,845! 2,3SS|7,5.7)' 2,73S5,41.V 2,S0O4,902j 3,-100
12,00512,87010,6678,875
MEMBER BANKS IN FEDERAL RESERVE BANK CITIES.
Number of reporting banks:Dec. 29Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17
Loans and discounts, gross:Secured by U. S. Gov-
ernment obligations-Dec. 27Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17
Secured by stocks andbonds-
Dec. 27Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17
All other loans and dis-counts-
Dec. 27Jan.3Jan. 10... ,Jan.17 ,
Total loans and discounts:Dec. 27Jan.3Jan. 10 ,Jan.17
U. S. bonds:Dec. 27
17. S. pre-war bonds:Dec. 27Jan.3Jan.10Jan.17
U. S. Liberty bonds:Dec. 27Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17
262261261261
197,818213,672213,453205,474
2,773,9582,915,1142,780,4862,798,185
4,449,842!4,521,885'4,539,732!4,542,196
7,421,6187,050,6717,533,6717,545,855
832,001
13,93313,71113,07313,372
63636363
85,602' 18,05596,920 18,53798,516 18,57795,999 17,990
196,5321,544,413 224,648195,74511,683,639 22S,932190,2811,535,104 233,842195,4461,537,891 220,829
424,352 1,949,205 295,472451,254 2,010,S63| 291,917452,299 2,027,604; 294,674455,979 2,017,399. 297,757
034,81713,570,220 5-38,175660,7103,791,422 539,3S0j655,6503,661,224: 547,093064,797,3,651,2S9| 636,576!
45,372 497,331! 48,014
7,2417,2097,1616,807
140,779138,464142,873140,082
294,872206,476297,141297,591
442,892442,149447,175444,540
30,531
2,296 1,4182,22l! 2,0712,013 2,0252,091 2,002
19,356 10,62620,34.2! 10,53621,360 10,62522,286 10,604
07,9706i. 15363)39263,923
89,05286,710;SO, 795|88,305!
37,40040,28240,37936,090
408,470409,345419,921440,502
51,910 629,27'49,471I 635,12250,376! 623,49'50,5S4 622,815
63,9541,075,24662,0781,084,74963,026;l,0S3,79463,3401,100,007
5,4971 5,196 59,29c
13;13;13;
15,825' 5,17215,730 5,45115,579 5,18714,4G2 5,205
106,109104,96S105,5S7107,521
165,520163,703169,222170,539
287,454284,407290,3SS202,572
30,657
2,4282,7052,3812,337
2,0292,235;1,0351,025
23,SOS25,01524,85424,996
95,120 119,92,865 119,624!95,197 118,050!100,060 116,815
124,190 142,838123,004 141,924125,23S 140,22.)130,8611 140,230
15151515
6,3206,5110,5970,444
20,580 11,143' G7,37419,595 10,924 67,00919,789 11,188! 65,05021,078 11,214! 65,676
55,739 300,575.52,49:): 293,88752,105' 206,11851,5281 290,551
6S,91ll 374,26965,699! 307,407G5,2SS 367,7746i,G67i 308,671
8,950 22,515 10,049; 63,544
97,48598,10698,097
2,3212,3212,321
38,735! 7,38338,358: 7,23338,304 7,233
4,580 1,825 2,9374,580 1,875 2,9204,580 1,775 2,937
1,736 8,2721,830 8,2242,073 8,224
3,7223,0313,031
2,127j 4,240 19,6072,131 4,240 21,3572,126 4,240( 21,253
660,964659,693661,038!
38,520 416,745 36,80038,295 418,246 36,960|39,619! 418,7111 37,710
24,94125,04025,156
3,790 l ,00S 51,465 15,6393,832 1,008 49,331 16,1313,852! l,00Sl 47,262' 15,63S
3,9361 19,532 4,5S0 44,0084,022i 19,619 4,593 42,6164,9S3! 19,S44l 4,594; 42,6S1
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 123: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
258 FEDERAL RESERVE BUUJ3TIK. , 1923,
PRINCIPAL RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES OF MEMBER BANES IN LEADING CITIES ON WEDNESDAYS, DECEMBER 27,
1922, TO JANUARY 17, 1923—Continued.
MEMBER BANKS XN FEDERAL RESERVE BANK CITIES—Continued.
[In thousands of dollars.]
Total. Boston, NewYork.
Phila-delphia.
Cleve-land.
Rich-mond. Atlanta, Chicago. St.
Louis.Minne-apolis.
KansasCity. Dallas.
SanFran-cisco.
U. S. Treasury bonds:Dec. 27Jan. 3Jan.10Jan.17
U. S. Victory notes andTreasury notes:
Dee. 27Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17
IT. S. certificates of indebt-edness:
Dec. 27Jan.3Jan. 10Jan. 17
Other bonds, stocks, andsecurities:
Dec. 27 ,Jan .3 . . . ,Jan. 10Jan. 17.. . .
Total loans and discountsand investments:
Dec.27Jan.3Jan. 10Jan. 17
Reserve balance with F. R.banks:
Dec. 27Jan.3Jan. 10Jan. 17
Cash in vault:Dec. 27 . .Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17
Net demand deposits:Dec. 27Jan.3 ...sJan.10Jan. 17
Time deposits:Dec. 27Jan.3. .Jan. 10 ,Jan.17
Government deposits:Dec. 27 ,Jan.3 ,Jan.10Jan. 17
Bills payable and redis-counted with F. R. banks:
Secured by U. S. Gov-ernment obligations-
Dec. 27....?Jan.3..TJan. 10Jan. 17
AH other-Dec. 27Jan.3Jan. 10Jan.17
89,38487,92293,43"
038,181607.612616,430715,719
172,246149,836136,915150,491
1,206,5991,219,9871,191,7981,199,714
10.270,64510,475,93910,324,53510,464,346
999,3901,032,0201,072,2331,024,569
198,265169 163165,836152,430
7,787,1817,972,5878,002,8727,992,973
1,792,77711,809,7441,811,0191,801,980
358,727268,751141,424224,900
320,339171,430!141,543153,272
91,84369,93141,60156,702
5,4565,3605,68S
20,17421,33421,02426,895
4,0194,2004,3634,748
79,38480,85980,81480,884
783,766813,400807,838824,953
68,82067,98572,63070,673
10,9629,9599,4898,575
877 4631,652,914664, "™661,
487 4;5224
102,817103,484103,838101,231
15fG3511,6316,213
16,535
7,3007,1952,6973,030
36,33023,29016,03123,967
4,0664,2934,23S
38,19537,85341,38657,494
6,5313,2051,9482,652
145,690147,590147,404151,329
776, 605776,283786,317797,232
63,92467,60364,59762,969
15,97114,41114,21613,636
615,127621,213646,457633,678
530, HO! 41,967531,8871 45,886525,158! 47,062510,110 47,844
235,958 28,409175,481 20,41993,582 10,896
122,132 25,076
39,41737,83S37,669
438,855433,318441,540492,705
118,863108,14799,836
109,783
555,838566,741558,841556,302
5,190,1075,394,5255,255,8835,304,766
590,913617,013651,207592,369
98,49876,37378,32171,573)
J\t 402,6584,533,6761,507,574!t475376|
75,846121.199119,821128,844
6,1183,9053,425ll,20S
15,45315,00310,79512,211
9,5406,0793,5164,523
1,876l,92fl1 —
8,467S,13S7 9679,693
2,3021,8611,8062,171
65,91:68,15465,17064,849
550,154551,699553,664552,915
29,16135,52329,53833,542
10,48710,6518,9818,575
221,641230,166228,740233,965
310,669312,232314,786314,222
5,3293,8872,0963,656
770570225
6,22710,2584,1951,868
327223360
1,08$704733856
1,8251,7011,6781,878
6,2307,2996,6626,42S
104,292102,362101,798103,454
6,0507,0795,4346^55
1,1971,0091,016
956
56,12858,58259,66862,774
24,32024,78524,85825,006
2,8002,0631,097979
2,5271,683130149
4,8275 2973.6822,990
415359359
1,2971,3671,365310
2,5871,5561,5562,502
3,3472,8012,7813,908
76,38172,16273,01574,364
0151;
6,7335,7406,0176,217
2,0322,2912,2691,078.
20,48020,18325,907
82,04854,40252,3S666,617
20,91119,97818,30418,714
193,538189,843181,979185,387
,431,038,422,653,407,813,445,967
141,011136,548144,982152,402
40,54835,95333,26931,202
45,7221,008,71747,0931,018,25547,84411,020,77347,5961,043,797
20,370 361,27620,76121,062 363:60926,081 364 9841,4261,051
5251,145
5353535
9061,201
855951
30,34725,42411,88224,750
3,1273,699050
2,615
11,6362,5921,096290
7,831
13,59113,31513,06317,086
3,0993,4432,7582,296
56,73757,48053,09255,103
391,538390,634391,618398,750
27,81328,80428,11431,062
4,6994,8343,9393,583
239,326247,59525* 857255,521
104,254102,795103,226103,503
9,1606,6473,4609^043
4,9853,784450112
3,1354,1861,0901,045
1,5731,036
730
3,0154,2385,924
4,493222124124
11,71212,09011,57411,620
149,345148,522149,263157,273
10,75313,36310,69211,042
2,3182,1802 2552,259
100,126102,738102,000106,557
35,39935 87736,38736,360
3,1852,300
8814,112
123123123123
1,1001,329
389454
1,3901,3651,485
7,9457,1737,2758,250
1,6231,4201,316832
12,55011,88411,92211,162
187,471185,450183,848183,929
17,22517,50518,22515,868
2,9022,7752,6062,323
160,215157,384160,173158,071
16,04216,49410,47016,271
5,1253,8081 9341,821
2,1035,1092,064
243276245238
1,018! 5,3482,077 5,3001,803 5,435
8,1277,3026,878
3,0082,4671583l|906l
1,5151,4131,4791,502
91,61086,71986,13886,311
5,5134,8096,9548,400
1,5281,4041,5271 i—
63,11562,86064,46266,115
10,85711,39111,71811,838
7,9795,9343,5552 793
S50
SS81
1,2541 897
18,39419,69118,57522,237
2,9851,6361,6382,885
74,14673,83370,08071,240
538,338531,530527,340534,432
31,47430,04833,84333,570
7,1237 3237,9456,537
242,529240,111245,837248,001
234,596239,463242,845241,530
13,37410,0495 30312.S58
8,10010,0303,4005,17Q
10,90010,637
MB-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 124: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1023. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 259
DEBITS TO INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS BY BANKS IN REPORTING CENTERS.
SUMMARY BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS.
[In thousands of dollars.]
| NumberFederal reserve district. (of centers
I included.
No. 1—BostonNo. 2—New YorkNo. 3-PhiladelphiaNo. 4--CleveIandNo. 5—RichmondNo. 6—AtlantaNo. 1—ChicagoNo. 8—St. LouisNo. 9—ianneapolisNo. 10—Kansas CityNo. 11—DallasNo. 12-San Francisco
Total 166
1922Week
ending-
Dec. 27.
414,9213,069,018416.8S7529,742195,851188,434941,938'226,092132,838236,219142,857445,964
7,540,761
Week ending—
Jan. 3. ; Jan. 10.
592,4056,045,605
523,888790,677235,743241,746
1,220,321332,435172,331316 726183,692562,683
514,0535.230,424
464,602I 619,009
240,631240,503
,110,025317,272157,555290,949167,635570,802
Jan. 17.
590,2175,455,191
467,818586,267230,239242,858
1,192,222293,750ICO 126287,641167,656587,537
Jan. 24.
510,1204,835,167431,506572,352224,170217,456
1,081,166259,443143,207260 761109,253527 860
1021Week
endmg™
Dec. 28.
358,4823,648,460
342,275389,340180,548140,69475-1,336176,762118,079182,314135,799397,142
192-2Week ending-
Jan. 4.
504,5034,800,781427,688001,810
208j405950,691250,388127,116232,761160,450509,037
Jan. 11.
, 484,2334,864,305
409 008409,786219,009198,242964,114228,118120,849241,836159,223519,219
# ! * r | #
11,218,252 J9,929,465 |l0,267,522 9.232,401 J6,833,231 JO,034,657 8,914,602 '8,970,330 j 7,5?9,6S7
Jan . 18. Jan . 25.
540,467 !5,002,491 !
395,213 I452,8-14 !197,516 i179.826950 469 '230,047 !123,079240,0S3149,100503,189
419,1184,138,0-10
.159,055428,188177,190163,9SU833,330187,005114 717212,987131,898431,158
DATA FOR EACH REPORTING CENTER.
[In thousands of dollars.]
District No. 1.—Boston:Bangor, MeBoston, MassBrockton, MassFall River, MassHartford, ConnHolyoke, MassLowell, MassLynn, MassManchester, N. HNew Bedford, MassNew Haven, ConnPortland, MeProvidence, It. ISpringfield, MassWaterbury, Conn. •Worcester, Mass
District No. 2.—New York:Albany, N.YBinghamton, N.YBullalo,N.YElmira, N.YJamestown. N. YMontclair, N. JNewark, N. J -NewYork,N.YNorthern New Jersey Clearing House
AssociationPassaic, N. JRochester, N. YStamford, Conn •Syracuse, N. Y
District No. 3.—Philadelphia:Allentown, PaAltoona, PaCamden, N. JChester, PaHarrisburg, PaHazleton, PaJohnstown, PaLancaster, Pa.Lebanon, PaNorristown, Pa •Philadelphia, PaReading, Pa
. Scranton, PaTrenton, N. JWilkes-Barre, PaWiUiamsport, PaWilmington, DelYork, Pa
1922Week
ending-
Dec. 27.
4,456279,804
4 0327,47921,3583 2954,4994,0324,0096,35014 7707 23528,06213,8825,79713,925
45,4326,58226,2612,51813 428
3,2339,1864,0828,2072 0725,8736,6901 318
734323,391
7,84816 30217 5639,1033 9576,4554,183
1923Week ending-
Jan. 3.
4,361407,257
4 7178,132
32,122,4 ,0851 5 170
5 7114,8227,709
20 1728992
41 62919 1239,760
19; 071
26,1944 789
78,8623,7194 3623,166
68,8035,866,014
54,0407,562
44,0892,899
18,095
7,5683,48014 1295 7066 8982,4635,7836,2111 528'732
426,0169,03318 05613,1639,8385,9119,0734,720
Jan. 10.
3,574344,0824,4597,85227,0534,1845,2885,7295,0096 21222,883
37,14917,8997,19417,580
26,5595 16379,8913,603
3,24360,428
5,056,168
53,4958,0S3
37,5614,58116,999
7,1S63,61810,6195,4337,6482,2675,6436,3621,478936
364,4109,93719,12913,8509,9494,7098,8095,105
Jan. 17.
3,386419,2906 5288,89125,95S4,0545,2405,6524,4768,21020,9419,10939,20715,7628,14417,543
22,4155,20472,2453,6104,4333,53571,077
5,298,006
48,8216,8S535,1773,26415,259
6,3764,08211,4936,6787,6342,6715,0806,8921,512915
371,22510,92815,88913,08710,0274,3038,3774,611
Jan. 24.
3,205357,4634 5298,03922,3384,0054,7184,6714 2936,93019,3347,62333,45615 8437,29015,517
17,8734,501
66,1773,5493,5703,335
59,9814,696,897
38,6845,945
29,4993,203
14,275
6,4183,429
10,1644 9216,6852,0184,5955 7891,360
798345,377
8,44717,02911,3908,0504,0517,4314,312
19*21Week
ending—
Dec. 28.
2,700249,413
5,37817 0892,6043,937
3,6774,80312,1405 20024,07410,7415,12111,485
22,7353 18243,426
Week ending-
Jan. 4.
3,707347,731
Jan. 11.
3,367335,724
6,76628,0402,7804,6035,3325,6296,410 !
18,938 !7,138 1
35,14114 7076,848
16,065
22,5754 085
64,289
3,541,421 4,057,565
5,02522,723
9,948
2,766
3,0546,279
4,7503,925
265,1956,695
13,84515,0017,7413,1576,4613,406
6,11536,802
15,350
2,776
4,5388,059
4,0954,667
345,3027,640
15,63511,1338,9094,4866,8943,554
6,82824,5573,0485,0046,0355,0326 226
18,4577,162
35,14112,3087 041
14,248
34,0784,51563,417
Jan. 18.
3,274382,488
7,15427,7183,0794,8996,4494,5807,165
19,6937,541
36,66513,8956,107
16,209
22,6503,724
61,524
703,125 4,800,232
Jan. 25.
2,909298,721
6,33718,9952.9283,fc605,4903,6105,653
14,9986,655
21,52312,9785,818
13,527
20,2313,33151,O0S
4,023,250
5,881 i39,190
6,004 |30,211
4,63924,452
14,159
2,727
4,2767,902
3,9734,636
322,2548,44.8
16,38511,4959,4214,1588,4865,447
12,146 11,135
2,878
4,6508,155
4,3624,549
317,8317,514
12,55410,5137,8153,8626,7263,804
2S 593
4,2098,087
3,5773,708
281,8746,877
15,91010,2588,3403,4036,8433,376
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 125: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
260 FEDERAL BESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
DATA FOR EACH REPORTING CENTER—Continued.
[In thousands of dollars.]
District No. 4—Cleveland:Akron, OhioButler, PaCanton, OhioCincinnati, OhioCleveland, OhioColumbus, OhioConnellsville, PaDayton, OhioErie, PaGreensburg, PaHomestead, PaLexington, Ky.Lima, OhioLorain, OhioNew Brighton, PaOil City, PaPittsburgh, PaSpringfield, OhioToledo, OhioWarren, OhioWheeling, W. VaYoungstown, OhioZanesville, Ohio
District No. 5—Richmond:Ashevile,N.CBaltimore, Md 'Charleston, S. CCharleston, W. VaCharlotte,N.CColumbia, S. CCumberland, MdDanville, VaDurham, N.CG reensboro, N.CGreenville, S. CHagerstown, Md-..Huntington, W. VaLynchburg, VaNewport News. Va .Norfolk, Va. . . .KaIeigh,N.CRichmond, VaRoanoke, VaSpartanburg, S. CWashington, D. CWilmington, N. CWinston-Salem. N. C...
District No. 6—Atlanta:Albany, GaAtlanta, GaAugusta, Ga..Birmingham. AlaBrunswick, GaChattanooga, TennColumbus, GaCordele, Ga....Dothan, AlaElberton, GaJackson, MissJacksonville, FlaKnoxville, TennMacon, Ga ,Meridian, MissMobile, AlaMontgomery, Ala ,Nashville, Tenn ,Newnan, GaNew Orleans, La '.Pensacoia, FlaSavannah, Ga ,Tampa, FlaValdosta, GaVicksbuxg, Miss .
District No. 1—Chicago:Adrian, Mich ,Aurora, 111Bay City, MichBloomington, HICedar Rapids, IowaChicago, Hi
1922Week
ending—
Dec. 27.
13,6832,365
10,44566,338
120,44633,9821,457
12,3625,8234,760
7025,2583,5301,0742,2582,S41
199,9014,218
37,5962,9889,615
12,9192,455
4,61273,8005,9848,1417,5404,3761,7762,4503,3634,0093,9001,8456,1494,4551,427
14,3855,800
30,5214,5211,64138,5184,8784,460
1,20026,6826,08317,897
8216,6712,909340618201
2,40510,9665,7254,6501,7835,7033,941
14,115. 34266,651
1,18210,6415,7791,0481,748,
7162,5372,4102,0834,071
594,109
1923 -Week end ing-
Jan. 3. Jan. 10. Jan. 17. Jan. 24,
17,3333,053
10,593113,922229,50438,048
1,25319,3637,1385,806
8166,7723,7411,3562,6003,127
260,7395,796
55,5792,340
11,35416,1963,254
4,17495,0906,888
11,0699,5395,8001,9382,7914,7635,3404,4002,1386,6796,6381,82516,3048,00032,3575,9593,07444,1996,4S76,300
1,41134,2187,30526,230
8459,4263,316459
1,080354
2,86213,1727,9465,4251,7217,7125,62719,185
64681,7911,82412,8906,9301,4112,065
8623,0272,4532,9187,199
826,966]
16,6142,93311,61977,416
162,753 i47,912 |1 446 I
16,4229,2715,189 ,
8367,6294,2581,4572,6913,612
191,2245,680
47,3183,040
11,59116,3783,446
4,33293,7005,8009,4659,9106,9832,0333,1444,7985,6765,3002,2687,4346.4591,90818,2009,00035,9046,6273,18749,7154,6858,237
1,38032,0147,76227,735
78210,5183,204411732388
3,57513,3128,4734,7022,2898,6215,62221,124
52678,4171,76210,5667,7271,4352,148
1.0113,7352,5382,6577,530
703,978
15,3242,4409,98984,226145,34735,9191,54015,0997,6215,171886
7,9743,8171,2042,5533,147
186,3625,5SS44,3162,92315,61814,5552,913
4,75091,0005,3118,7439,2536,6641,8512,6204,8245,2665,4002,3856,2515,4102,00116,4388,50036,1275,4822,82346,4834,8127,738
1,10532,7567,69426,850
5989,5313,207322
1,080240
3,35513,2128,7285,3792,5947,2784,87719,085
43687,265
1,6059,3947,0791,2852,125
9993,1292,2862,6605,913
779,910
16,5652,3089,95874,2S0
142,00331,8241,162
16,2037,5024,678
7186,8983,6681,2612,1013,270
199,86S6,060
3S,5783,266
11,30913,3142,735
4,87183,70010,3839,2878,3975,6721,6752,7514,2875,6474,7002,0105,9154,7701,758
15,4167,950
33,9005,6052,304
44,1294,0087,170
1,03027,3037,592
26,005600
8,0773,160
267710205
2,87111,9866,6524,7592,4566,3815,0S8
15,596379
77,5481,5819,4016,7591,1482,728
9543,0552,2772,4185,831
698,362
1921Week
ending—•
T>ec. 28.
9,117
53,785113,05424,936
11,4734,5063,182
3,127
1,944118,241
2,98228,317
6,4448,232
84,5675,314
5,5264,290
3,106
3*803"
13,4633,05020,224
33,0314,174
20,5265,91712,346
6,143
8,8924,6053,827
5,6283,110
11,547
50,3651,1009,5224,704
1,462
2,3011,6396,315
495,008
1922Week end ing-
Jan. 4.
12,365
94,305179,28432,269
13,8855,4743,030
6,265
2,544194,410
2,50939,115
8,7247,631
121,9297,600
8,5047,071
5,198
4,462
14,8849,000
27,555
36,3515,807
28,2437,62116,687
8,058
10,1547,3454,015
7,3813,78114,356
76,8061,29514,6245,893
2,146
2,5322,47211,188638,713
Jan. 11. Jan. 18.
13,889
70; 828132,69229,122
14,4426,4722,659
5,408
3,001157,7215,04535,917
7,88314,707
99,2717,411
6,7795,542
4,922
5,125
14,5385,00024,460
41,0624,899
26,6137,32918,403
9,455
11,8436,7593,900
6,5103,887
13,535
70,2761,4929,9446,447
1,844
2,5362,2309,880
636,167
12,463
65,464119,69327,921
11,9055,4794,0S6
4,734
2,627146,317
3,76033,368
6,6808,347
78,8385,838
6,7786,162
3,347
5,003
14,7364,900
27,884
39,1794,851
24,9590,02213,382
8,177
9,6946,5553,496
4,9463,65217,289
64,0661,4208,8135,733
1,622
2,7152,1269,200
641,083
Jan. 25.
11,720
60,766105,23723,743
10,9924,8412,468
3,970
2,372144,929
3,6C037,278
6,7029,510
71,6045,780
5,5544,670
3,499
*4*0S2
12,4804,60025,049
36,2633,015
26,4825,835
13,541
6,003
9,4735,6863,296
6,3033,32313,765
59,1131,3268,6105,542
1,6
2,0781,8247 758
563,299
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 126: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 261
DATA FOR EACH REPORTING CENTER—Continued.
[In thousands of dollars.]
District No. 7—Chicago—Continued.Danville, HI.Davenport, Iowa.Decatur,IliDes Moines, Iowa,Detroit, MichDubuque, IowaFlint. MichFort wayne, IndGary. IndGrand Rapids, MichGreen Bay, WisHammond, IndIndianapolis, IndJackson, MichKalamazoo, MichLansing, MichMason City, IowaMilwaukee, WisMoline,IllMuscatine, IowaOshkosh, WisPeoria, 111 ,Rockford,IllSaginaw, Mich ,Sioux City, IowaSouth Bend, Ind ,Springfield, IUTerre Haute, IndWaterloo, Iowa
District No. 8—St. Louis:East St. Louis and National Stock
Yards. Ill 8,422EvansviUe, Ind 7,204Fort Smith, Ark 2,565Greenville, Miss 843Helena, Ark 1,252Little Rock, Ark 13,630Louisville, Ky 30,790Memphis, Tenn 30,775Owensboro, Ky 1,953Quincy.lU 1,957St. Louts. Mo 130,318Springfield, Mo 3,096
District No. 9—Minneapolis:Aberdeen, S. Dak 1,152Billings, Mont 2,100Dickinson. N. Dak 306Duluth, Minn 14,419Fargo. N. Dak 2,168Grand Forks, N. Dak 1,519Helena, Mont 3,293Jamestown, N. DakLaCrosse, Wis ' j 422Lewistown, Mont. 1,838Minneapolis, Minn ! 70,663Minot.N. Dak I 946Red Wing, Minn 497St. PauOIinn »31,271
Do H657Sioux Falls, S. Dak 3,602Superior, Wis 1,780Winona,Minn S71
District No. 10—Kansas City:Atcblson, KansBartlesviUe, OklaCasper, Wyo
1922 'Week :
ending— j1923
Week cnding-
1921Week
j ending—
2,900 i10,807 I4,23017,542146,5494, OSS5,8609,7402,62414,6032,2413,33037,9855,2155,23:t7,5002,78759,3721,G721,5422,600 |10,532 S5,576 I5,093 i16,1987,5756,2805,9454,228
Cheyenne, WyoColorado Springs, Colo.,Denver, Colo...Enid, OklaFremont. NebrGrand Island, Nebr.. .Grand Junction, Colo..Guthrie, OklaHutchinson, KansIndependence, Kans..,Joplin,MoKansas City, KansKansas City, MoLawrence, Kans
1,4172 7473,2443,0432,73136,1351,786712991510657
2,9521,7343,1854,090G7,45S
776
3,000 '10,4933,38620,920134,6794,1297,4198,9003,879 ;15,3952,5Si3,53041,5727,3785,6310,7002,05168,3.502,1002,0463,4009,4826,8315,89018,7769,3387,3307,4764,513
8,6849,0092,8601,1801,73513,21441,18741,1461,6532,812
212,3214,062
1,5812,882464
18,2352,8871,8642,867551
2,8231,23194,5801,334628
140,22546,4444,0751,7171,418
1,3284,1514,3094,5642,69740,3173,344
7951.459640954
3,7522,1983,3114,96690,4861,423
12,0079 1463,0001,4842,00618,73244,61943 7332,3252,875
181,9594,201
1,3872,030476
16,2652 9171 9692,56-1679
3,3761 60S80 6131,592591
2,7007,5473,39918,049152,3243,9867,0448,0422,96615,7162,3973,26044,4585,5666,1026,8002,19267,7571,7221,4602,70010,1966,0046,160
18,1607,9066,3145,9854,361
2,7007,9713,029
2OOJO
10,7598,25S2,8571,4681,506
15,79345,19640,749
1,9442,844
166,8423,309
1,2132,145
37315,1742,8532,0062,916508
2,9351,519
85,0161,047
525
146,188 i4,001 i8,003 ,7,525 i2,899 !
14,074 i2,063 L3,750 | .
36,669 I4,515 I4,430 i7,300 |2,103 j .
61,2401.642 !1,421 j .2,300 L8,464 ,4.643 !5,537 ;.
16,038 :7,101 :5,6165,4473,766 :
9,0S5 !6,970 i2,906 i1,122 !1,337 i13,009 !39,99536,1641,5572,311
147,8343,175
1,1271,622260
13,8312,4161,6532,590520
2,6111,16073,590
70S415
5,4S92,24712,05291,1552,2634,2316,001
Dec. 27. Jan. 3. Jan. 10. Jan. 17. Jan. 21. Dec. 28.
2,4007,3622,78815,429138,809
2,8585,9117,5763,578
14,5691,9883,400
33,1114,0654,7135,5002,394
51,3821,4431,4222,2007,2294,3895,213
13,8279,9165,1896,3433,199
1922Week ending-
Jan. 4. | Jan. 11. Jan . 18. J Jan. 25.
7,7812,797
14,868104,240
3,2044,1907,054
7,5543,002
17,769116,470
3,1324,3656,927
18,108 17,113i •
27,951 •3,518 ;3,35:13,052 '
31,1883,7524,61t»4,500
41,ISO !
1,28755,148
1,384
6,168 !
3,852 j7, G174,335
5,180 | 7,5904,437 I 5,9744,738! 5,179
2,202 t 3,256
19,850
31,6983,7174,8624,4UO
6,2642,997
16,614112,045
2,9295,450 .•6,799
32,671 l3,8733,8354,640
52,217 52,2771,772 I 1,847 i
8,0934,782
7,4915,9985,853
6,098 ;,4 ,962 I
7,5866,020
8,806 j
20', 529 !
1,532107,037
l,4S0
1,0401,502
10,4731,7531,0762,811
61,682
40,534 |4,476 |1,860 12,940 i
i1,6702,5625 1173,3503,095
43,4773,316 I1,076 I1 484 I
960 !S50 !
3,795•1,S223,4784,49886,254 ,1,127 ;
39,2154,6701,6S13,207
1,6692,7963,1422,9012,865
38,3823,096964
1,25569S890
3,0962,9SS3,4354,1168S,594
IKK
39,6113,6711,6111,4S5
1,6094,0663,1922,3952,551
35,8682,652
7201,254
421879
3,5612,1752,8437,91878,863
976
32,280
3,0011,724734
12,49430,51127,497
2,029106,2313,420
1,6212,085
12,1252,2961,2763,171
70,367
27,384
3,329
8,8220,603
11,34031,42731,082
2,247133,427
3,165
1,2621,740
7,662 I4,422 •
8,423 j5,184 <6,111 |
2,029
8,0936,431
9,03731,25327,257
2,092143,759
3,125
1,2781,753
12,9302,4331,4962,953
8,8832,1491,4782,336
67,705 62,261
28,652 |
4,1041,5681,119
8S5 1,0222,231 | 2,431
2,2821,759
30,414
1,911:i, 113
51,100
3,37y3,556
34,081
2,4053,911
05,873
4,7541,7141,210
1,2402,528
"2," 779*2,816
37,496
2,0783,364
63,350
36,1304,254i,5S7
970
1,3S32,099
""3 ," 253*2,651
33,100
2,4184,172
65,342
1 Debits of banks which submitted reports in 1921.
30425—23 9
7,1502,506
13,68991,4692,4774,6506,620
14,307 ; 13,205
28,9913,1073,5013,892
45,6901,518
6.6403,946
7,0214,6834,811
2,745
7,5105,081
9,37126,95721,191
1,922112,0332,940
1,0761,452
10,8621,8471,0532,169
57,372
33,1213,63S1,29T>
831
9601,799
***3,*3642,523
31,971
2,1023,471
58,038
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 127: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
262 FEDERAL BESEBVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
DATA FOR EACH REPORTING CENTER-Continued.
(In thousands of dollars.]
District No. 10—Kansas City—Con.McAIester, OklaMuskogee, OklaOklahoma City, OklaOkmulgee, OklaOmaha, NebrParsons, KansPittsburgh KansPueblo, ColoSt. Joseph, MoTopeka, KansTulsa,OklaWichita, Kans
District No. l l~Dallas:Albuquerque, N. MexAustin, TexBeaumont, TexCorsicana, TexDallas, TexEl Paso, TexFort Worth, TexGalveston, TexHouston, TexRoswell, N. MexSan Antonio,Tex.:Shreveport, LaTexarkana. TexT ucson, ArizWaco, Tex
District No. 12—San Francisco:Bakersfield, CalifBellingham,WashBerkeley, Calif.Boise, Idaho..
1922Week
ending-
Dec. 27.
Eugene, Oreg..Fresno, Calif.Long Beach, CalifLos Angeles, CalifOakland, Calif.Ogden, UtahPasadena, CalifPhoenix, ArizPortland, OregReno, NevRitzville,WashSacramento, Calif.Salt Lake City, Utah..San Bernardino, Calif..San Diego, CalifSan Francisco, Calif...San Jose, Calif.Seattle, WashSpokane, WashStockton, Calif.Tacoma, WashYaldina,Wash
9585,925
16,9671,989
39,9801,0381,6025,133
12,3073,281
22,0909,730
2,0653,5643,1031 785
38,5507,116
25,7S816,07825,754
4746,1347,5762,0521,6753,402
1,9531,4692,7324,3722,300
11,8399,197
120,72819,096
5,3874,166
27,2692,198
13410,83414,7261,4657,667
142,0824,462
31,8779,7424,2808,0461,961
Jan. 3.
1923Week ending—
1,3608,318
. 23,2502.55854;0961,0961,3S06,08117,5363,87339,10512,597
2,0274,4363,7111,22854,7058,02227,42021,88136,067
7256,3049,0342,1303,0314,924
3,2261,7803,2773,0701,600 i13,02810,751 f145,81929,863•7,4266,509 i4,74332,4543,210
215 I18,346 j19,157 I1,30312,733183,1325,83340,78911,9324,9367,9042,509
Jan. 10. Jan. 17.
1,1617,70919,3582,65153,0961,1981,4134,29917,0654,98323,49612,559
2,2864,1454,9172,16446,5157,74627,10619,98827 764
6387,87210,6372,0852,0794,495
2,6811,6805,0924,1431,71314,19514,103149,96530,1998,6198,7605,19830,5472,907187
23,64215,3982,23012,832172,1947,23938,64913,029
9,9752,711
Jan. 24.
1,2626,61221,6963,05248,720
9371,7333,70717,1793,92028,37512,674
2,5433,9224,3671,31144,6927,12727,788.17,88632,453
721 ;7,61510,4172,0682,0524,721 '
2,841 i2,132 I5,107 !3 644 !2,12912,30912,699 j163,34726,4156,987 !8,1194,70736,7632,678154
20,74616,1861,82711,406186,5005,54640.49312,7855,5207,9322,055
1,0236,53316,4011,975
48,4461,0101,4093,388
14,2603,507
21,92810,185
2,0313,4723 7741,428
40,6607,081
27,97630,83029.317
4727,4168,6712,0581,8504,117
2,2081,6765,8952,7852,020
11,01112,587
146,40423,629
6,3266,4274,742
30,2442,545
10916,97913,4861,459
12,189170,295
5,41436,12710,7574,6208,2391,901
1921Week
ending-
Dec. 28.
3,204,15,353
24,980
3,39313,0862,613
18,7287,250
1,7882,6692,962
30,9218,87531,94013,57525,704
4,9796,3411,5811,5002,964
2,3432,626
8,9654,60590,80215,4913,3014,196
25,8201,712
16,56412,683
6,151148,6394,21429,0947,7543,8546,1802,148
1922Week ending- -
Jan. 4. Jan. 11. Jan. 18.
4,10422,192
3,42921,367
36,406 35,843
3,45015,7633,774
22,3328,082
2,0873,0333,221
41,1507,81932,56616,24632,535
5,4318,1802,6201,5713,992
3,4752,911
10,5940,045
128,01218,7455,9525,315
28,4943,241
11,13321,928
8,512190,0783,17935,82510,703*4,3708,3032,762
4,75917,0503,95028,5559,632
2,0113,3883,959
41,9539,57233,12717,22125,788
7,4767,7201,3S61,7923,830
4,4533,154
11,2467,825
121,70522,7505,8826,801
31,5332,849
18,20214,847
10,000196,6677,104
26,1069,8777,1878,3052,726
3,57518,187
38,401
2,69619,0643,88029,46810,394
1,9763,2283,362
34,042
33,10016,55125,769
7,7349,0591,2261,4503,800
4,1333,449
9,6766,846
127,85018,7043,9457,426
31,1622,325
15,81715,227
9,452183,5695,42832,8089,8394,5868,4172,530
Jan. 25.
2,65916,559
36,629
2,50516,1633,37221,406
1,5422,1763,575
29,7677,37831,26513,14325,645
5,3316,0821,2511,5533,190
3.1632,981
8,9965,876
111,56418,36647465,520
25,9991,851
11,06210,372
8,978145,131
4,30142,1899,2054,2617,7501,847
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 128: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
FEDERAL RESERVE CLEARING SYSTEM.
OPERATIONS DURING DECEMBER, 1922.
[Numbers in thousands. Amounts in thousands of dollars.]
Items drawn on banks locatedin own district.
Federal reserve bank orbrnnch.
BostonNow York
BuffaloPhiladelphiaCleveland
CincinnatiPittsburgh
RichmondBaltimore
AtlantaBirmingham..JacksonvilleNashvilleNow Orleans
ChicagoDetroit
St. LouisLittle RockLouisvilleMemphis
MinneapolisHelena..
Kansas CityDenverOklahoma CityOmaha
DallasEl PasoHouston
San FranciscoLos AngelesPortlandSalt Lake CitySeattleSpokane
Total: DecemberNovember
In Federalreserve bank or
branch city.
; Amount. Num-ber.
13,04811,840
618,0444,497,835
102,634919,287274,431142,321277,041154,868160,553197,54249,27024,54031,93852,053
666,114193,597269,184
32,13474,46047.734
134,6022,059
230,248<o2,22257 66961,0S992,01611,54246,320
139,757153,42836,33134.63339,28919,611
9,896,396 40,1989,641,082 30,671
Outside Federalreserve bank or
branch city.
4,0145,766
5162,5291,504
9251,0592,265808409222197253134
4,576625
1,666391501247
1,843153
1,515414
1,101697
1,657152402788
1,615249466261218
Amount. Num-ber.
457,839743,18060,578320,427174,31892,621115,123328,44480,83649,56717,89019,20122,33316,652362,27753,87096,50226,49530,15518,27797,87613,393100,70928,49476,49136,572212,44911,06436,14248,293117,20712,84832,69717,32811,608
3,939,7593,728,616
Items drawnon Treasurer of"United States.
Amount.
164
'' 171758878515159
I3J1416;39
1398
4113471593
s31715745G22194411
15,431121,844
2,49031,2146,5227,3796,0126,9466,5194,7191,4441 1441,51318,08156,6854 487
11,3061,5688,4932,629
Total itemshandled, exclu-sive of dupli-
cations.
Num-ber. Amount.
4,8129,143
7604,7702,379
11,2351 6682,4511 2 3 2 |1,160
4S22853402.54
6,204981
2, ISO479659349
Items for-warded to
other Federalreserve banks
and theirbranches.
Num-ber.
6,56S[*2,I73
3,0863^149
1,25211,7614,8991,7882,6144,5751,5201,440
165,58421,2846 r6433,967
10,1322,454
562,907352,937
1961,985596
1.186* 2
1,923218501
1,2142,072
347545445272
'56,34851,677
1,091,3145,362,859165,702
1,270,928455,271
a 243,965398,176490,258247,908251,828!68,604!44,88555,784!
86,78Gl1,085,076251,954376,99260,200113,10868,640
> 243,15216,704342,71885,615135,948
> 100,437309,04024,12683,902353,634291,91955,82271,29766,74933,673
'14,404,97413,730,270
2431,35715151279161001S71993324379493872443
12292
27183595094151837
122
162716
4,3813,836
Amount. Num-
55,767147,75525,24998,189
Items for-warded to
parent bankor to branch
in samedistrict.
ber.1 Amount.
6,28641,54966,70441,662
9,502!13,999i6,787jl,840 !
14,44136,844
6,6514,078
9851,097
30516, soi;4,26li
36,018'16,216!
8,149;5,396
10,335|2,198i2,3354,307!
17,041}1 3313,419!5,8S1|2,865!
2735
*34163542872831
746
125
11112212
755520205075
376243124820
722,883!705,189
852774
19,429
'"¥, 2233,1108,947
10,7268,8424,319
35,2701,4191,105
9332,490
Total items handled, includingduplications.
Number of nonmemberbanks.
Number.
1922
5,0555,30110,527
1921*
Amount.
1922
9465,2822,4921,2671,803
?;65f8:
'•SI3291
353;309
6,603, i l 010
1,829= 2,234!1,381 493!
166 673|266! 353;120; 2,266:
1,54112,26414,5066,8904,6396,176
6781,3394,775
2052,331
7341,265
92212,067
240!524t
1 ,2" '8,150 2,256;4,205 397;2,246! 573j5,925 5202,962! 308
4,6528,493
'9294,G79i1,826}1,128'1,4432,401j1 183
561i462!263|302274-
5,474!798:
1,891'389;557;289
*250.2,069
6181,055
713'1,572212462902
1,756341518393267
1921 >
1,147,0815,515,915
210,3801,369,117
469,084253,361448,672567,688298,412265,649117,87353,091'58,729!
102,1601,124,410
261,419382,899
62,566,114,37169,21l!
260,12322,500
391,000116,337\150,9S7f110,472325,551!27,002:87,5761
362,716:317,110
61,35s1
76,96278,555;39,500,
1,028,1862,879,242
183,6531,147,041
354,348206,477359,132514,113]255,101128,61878,34644,38156,94676,066
964,158197,544319,097
47,82385,15451,472!
230,57735,324
361,896101,948134,54292,038
282,32724,67875,788
216,509243,52860,43977,01365,17441,692
191,98661,5S1 50,984 15,319,843'll, 018,371182,81556,287 49,66014,61S, 274'10,8S0,891
159| 167ISO! 152
3? i
152 1S452! 23
2,2632,218
1 Incorporated banks other than mutual savings banks,a N 16 to Dec 15
m
a Nov. 15.I Ttiolud^itoms 'drawn on banks in other Federal reserve districts forwarded direct to drawee banks as follows: Cincinnati, 11,000 items, $1,644,000; Minneapolis, 5,000 items, 14,106,000; Ornate 255
itemsT $162,000; total, 16,000 items and $5,912,000.NOTB —Number of business days in period for Nashville waa 26 and for other Federal reserve banks and branch cities, 25 days.
CO
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 129: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
264 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
GOLD AND SILVER IMPORTS AND EXPORTS.IMPORTS INTO AND EXPORTS FROM THE UNITED STATES, DISTRIBUTED BY COUNTRIES.
Gold. Silver.
Countries.
IMPORTS.DenmarkFranceGermanyNetherlandsNorwaySpain ]Sweden |United Kingdom:
England.Scotland
C a n a d a . . . . . . . . . . .Central America..MexicoWest Indies 1Argentina fChile
December- Twelve months endingi December- December—
1921
$2,021,1563,708,371
470,009673,280
1922 I 1921 1922
$.5,526,222
28,365
1,362,560
13,729,437
ColombiaPeruUruguayVenezuelaChinaBritish IndiaDutch East Indies..HongkongP h i l i
2,314,451694 734329,602188,878
7,23461,514
1,020,608166,102371,146156,08899,586195,167290,747
H o g gPhilippine Islands..British Oceaniaritish Ocea
AU^therV."
Total.EXPORTS.
SpainSwedenUnited Kingdom—England.CanadaCentral AmericaMexicoWest IndiesColombiaChina.ChinaBritish IndiaDutch East Ind ies . .French East Indies. .HongkongJapan.
218,7782,154,527
902,532529,320
31,665,827
25,000
206,209
"i,*685*386'
212,130
All other. 32,863
i5,46220,828
15,600,648
I $5,431,500190,666,45319,926,76119,893,0191,534,9853,319,281
66,355,925
202,091,349
501,657195,187493,76715,3325,84534,011255,239282,033
66,9971,177,273
95,884
73,978
26,439,677
10,000
15,4721,656,937
454,950135
250,200
311,700
"io'm'Total j 2,161,582 ! 2,709,591
36,856,1106,539,8205,588,7377,081,5631,066,471
447,63311,941,6851,613,6216,817,9031.353,846
17,912,68732,009,5531,316,5455,660,8251,399,808
16,970,2616,874,924
20,577,032
$17,769,57627,043,158
35,1189,957,8708 423,894
71,12532,885,875
121,732,152151,320
10,378,0324,373,2205,912,737
691,248,297
25,2002,643,013
2,913,783
7,090,419250,844
1,179,00060,000
9,621,655
23,891,377
389,3396,847,9101,619,119
273,689915,169
8,937,975
*i,"626,"9li'14 730
853,0344,230,9002,569,1016,350,983
1921
$8446,879
69,990
1922
$2,362
29,136
13,1S9 37,503
255,81875,348
3,842,400427
1,021123,62714,463
795,39124,244
6625
*"iii,"o28'
1,817137
179,190
275,169,785 | 5,515,904
727,00078,00020,990 ;
22,161,759 !12,127
4,303,6095,884
500,000350,200
4,445,339435,010
130,960656,879
94,4703,758
2,529,61584,325
3,582,385 J:
252,591
1,320,0002,005,797
34,243
36,874,894
285,000
7,145,047
924,17583,289
5,201,19939,308
270121,56611,645
1,180,316
804,398
2,212123
124,124
7,847,570
1,897,927133,660
182,334. 467
2,293,5942,114,046
291,172
6,913,200
Twelve months endingDecember—
1921
$1,2141S4,513
5,320,3372,4747,767
16,4716,604 ;
1,199,408 I
1922
$987206,856707,137
11,732145,621
1,790
236,576
3,807,2032,022,926
41,249,925306,510
19,6131,825,744
178,6325,598,218
28,1103,3098,029
12,368494,047
'39621,7734,679
169922,232
63,242,671
11,843,1034,591,373
284,8432,140,667
425,372239,500
12,782,8793,233,382
1,848,00010,408,0213,492,359
285,900
6,975,8811,461,229
48,453,079577,137
6,4191,639,639
253,0138,179,895
2 1673,718
12,215
6 ,75
12,6891 579
12,7881,287,759
70,806,653
60010,685,5402,220,671
7,3502,269,685
29,433805,703
20,225,80811,971,351
1,320,00012,852,797
47 237371,111
51,575,399 62,807,286
DISCOUNT RATES OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS IN EFFECT JANUARY 31, 1923.
Federal reserve bank.
BostonNew YorkPhiladelphia..ClevelandRichmondAtlantaChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolis. . .Kansas City. . .DallasSan Francisco.
Paper maturing within 90 days.
Secured b y -
Treasury notesand.
certificates ofindebtedness.
United Statesbonds and
Victory notes.
Tradeacceptances.
Commercial,agricultural,
and live-stockpaper, o. e. s.
444444 !4- 44
4J4*444
84141414
444444444444444i44444
Bankers'acceptances
maturingwithin
3 months.
Agriculturaland live-stock
papermaturing
after 90 days,but within6 months.
4y41
4j
4
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 130: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
FEBBUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BUIiLETIN. 265
GOLD SETTLEMENT FUND.
INTERBANK TRANSACTIONS FROM DECEMBER 29, 1922, TO JANUARY 25, 1923, INCLUSIVE.
[In thousands of dollars.]
Transfers.
Federal reserve bank.
Debits. Credits,
BostonNew YorkPhiladelphia...ClevelandRichmond.. . . .Atlanta..ChicagoSt. LouisMinneapolis...,Kansas City...,DallasSan Francisco.,
9,500214,0007,500
1,000
1,0001 0003,0003,000
Total 4 weeks end ing-Jan. 25,1923 240,000Dec. 28,1922 77,000Jan. 26,1922 82,475Dec. 29,1921 149,273
5,00019,00012,50023,50023,00014,00038,00031,00013,00024,000
1,00036,000
240,00077,00082,475
149,273
Daily settlements.
Debits. Credits,
574,7662,021,140656,011548,424457,097238, GOO
1,029,079525,805142,616376,406216,496275,966
7,062,4126,547,5245,123,0815,166,443
591,8562,117,665653,791560,103448,089226,460
1,023,911499,117137,264350,978210,365242,213
7,062,4126,547,5245,123,0815,166,443
Changes in ownershipof cold throughtransfers and settle-ments.
Decrease.
98,475
2,4288,131
763
109,787
Increase.
12,590
2,78035,17914 592
85432,8324,3126,648
109,787
Balance Infund atclose ofperiod.
29,070155,64821,224
100,35731,78725,25101,24516,08733,92937,25013,37934,627
559,854516,681503,703541,973
MONEY IN CIRCULATION, JANUARY 1, 1923.
[Source: United States Treasury Department circulation statement.]
i Money held by jStock of money I the U . S . j
Money in circulation.
in theUnited States.
Treasury andthe Federal !
reserve system. | Amount.
Gold coin and bullionGold certificatesStandard silver dollarsSilver certificatesTreasury notes of 1890Subsidiary silverUnited States notesFederal reserve notes } 2,817,191,215 ,Federal reserve bank notes 43,913,965National-banknotes ' 702,128,087 |
Total >Comparative totals:
Dec. 1,1922Jan. 1,1922Apr. 1,1917.July 1,1914Jan. 1,1879 :
$3,933,475,615 $3,50-1,283,430* (703,130,329) 405,380,430
441 754,404 ! — "* (344,280,093)'
Ml, 484,883)1209,288,995346,681,016 !
380,289,09555,696,884
1,00023,310,9S660,475,349
444,326,2947,186,171
54,480,566
$429,192,179302,743,89961,465,309
288,589,8091,483,883
245,978,0092S6,205,607
2,372,864,92136,727,794
707,647,521
8,614,433,297 I ' 4,935,43G, 211 I 4,732,898,991
8,482,254,5518,282,070,4525,312,109,2723,738,2SS,8711,007,084,483
*4,8S5,537,645•4,750,975,593* 3,896,318,653* 1,843,452,323
•212,420,402
4,616,508,0594,521,566,5704,100,590,7043,402,015,427
816,266,721
Percapita.
$3.882.74.50
2.61.01
2.232.59
21.46.33
6.40
42,81
41.8041.5139.5434.3516.92
1 Does not include gold bullion or foreign coin outside of vaults of the Treasury, Federal reserve banks, and Federal reserve agents.* These amounts are not included in the total, since the money held in trust against gold and silver certificates and Treasury notes of 1S90 is
Included under gold coin and bullion and standard silver dollars, respectively.' Includes gold held in trust against gold certificates and standard silver dollars held in trust against silver certificates and Treasury notes of
1890, the aggregate of which should be deducted from the sum of money held by the United States Treasury and the Federal reserve system andmoney in circulation to arrive at the stock of money in the United States. The amounts of such gold and silver held in trust as of the date of thisstatement are shown in parentheses in the first column.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 131: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
EARNINGS AND EXPENSES OP FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1922.
EARNINGS.
Discounted billsPurchased billsUnited States securitiesDeficient reserve penaltiesMiscellaneous
Total earnings
Total.
$26,523,1^35,628,956
16,682,463602,951
1,053,246
50,490,739
Boston.
$1,543,539591,647
1,391,6919,7774,659
3,541,313
NewYork.
$3,970,2101,619,5125,227,488
49,738474,371
11,341,319
Philadel-phia.
$2,393,G73712,383
1,119,45714,40912,028
4,251,950
Cleve-land.
$2,247,667743,759
1,946,91527,22328,718
4,994,282
Rich-mond.
$2,569,88774,65595,37887,0805,944
2,832,944
Atlanta.
$1,951,695164,704189,39044,3572,590
2,352,736
Chicago.
$3,862,291547,339
2,081,34049,761
208,132
6,748,863
St. Louis.
$1,303,808255,750832,16945,91518,805
2,456,447
Minne-apolis.
$1,451,659
383,531128,087
5,971
1,969,248
KansasCity.
$1,492,6578,828
1,408,73847,215
137,222
3,094,660
Dallas.
$1,609,383197,994195,04950,43232,917
2,085,775
SanFrancisco.
$2,126,654712,385
1,811,31748,957
121,889
4,821,202
CURRENT EXPENSES.
Salaries:Bank officersClerical staffSpecial officersAllother
Governors' conferencesFederal reserve agents' conferencesFederal Advisory CouncilDirectors' meetingsTraveling expenses l
Assessment for Federal ReserveBoard expenses
Legal feesInsurance (life, fidelity, casuality.
workmen's compensation, andgeneralliability)
Banking house:TaxesFire insuranceLight, heat, and powerRepairs and alterations (not
of permanent character). . . . .Allother.
BentFire insurance—furniture and
equipmentOffice and other suppliesPrinting and stationeryTelephoneTelegraphPostage (other than on money and
security shipments)Expressage (other than on money
and securities shipments)Security shipmentsCurrency and coin shipmentsFederal reserve currency:
Original cost, including ship-ping charges ,
Cost of redemption, includingshipping charges.,
Taxes on Federal Reserve banknote circulation
All other expenses
Total current expenses.
2,461,32314,222,021
818,7721,310,524
5,5154,0299,063
146,084293,236
722,54563,322
433,273
270,9159,238
175,908
89,63833,122
1,040,949
11,099443,193739,715203,023573,858
1,118,151
49,084139,392
1,078,518
1,578,592
434,179
304,261776,801
29,559,343
141,000925,07234,430
100,932411426250
7,3679,820
55,241775
29,072
90,9002,081
25,489
1,7671,886
52,772
38126,53974,58821,1697,977
81,415
2,43414,005
147,072
65,501
38,792
23,87138,965
2,022,400
494,8443,602,883
188,207280,085
490247845
23,07528,923
197,8823,982
63,887
29,184348
16,569
2,5813,345
350,284
90962,48190,27648,98363,943
128,952
4,17638,485228,530
553,125
70,174
69,374129,461
6,776,530
129,499982,60057,95283,477
206181461
6,40716,378
60,6254,370
43,202
21,276452
39,085
20,3961,4251,675
78431,45751,97323,43118,745
73,008
4,2836,498
142,359
118,014
43,381
24,72345,596
2,053,919
220,1001,081,239
93,785108,236
360260613
8,38621,036
76,7375,538 i
24,612
23,493'8977,494
6,84520,084162,648
1.09137,96566,08015,96936,516
82,843
3,04316,011101,218
124,508
37,788
21,33554,536
2,461,266
155,467760,88333,18978,739
166123629
5,79523,101
37,40212,218
22,541
40,901
10^989
24,854i 2744,341
61336,38448,4315,944
34,934
89,731
2,2155,669
59,415
68,358
24,734
13,18427,358
1,631,356
159,994487,75123,37538,758
656286690
21,75819,284
30,1648,948
27,651
9,393260
10,555
1,101562
25,841
24817,81933,2254,54664,789
61,085
1,8323,25152,634
107,938
25,219
22,36031,080
/367,1561,907,058155,333236,665
309348992
8,22142,083
98,3071,387
65,581
43
1,293,053
205,729
1,77583,090109,17231,328C2,168
150,434
3,82411,717136,943
95,378
82,631
33,425188,960
4,080,057
155,877829,07228,41840,750
456228
1,25010,67524,498
31,8202,919
40,587
3,076170
3,014
382193
73,627
1,02719,24437,9777,44842,841
97,582
3,4778,08143,711
52,719
11,586
16,37734,140
1,623,222
107,977463,39022,28116,446
467267
1,14011,40721,470
24,94511,592
25,311
1,578
902
1,66711
44,038
48121,95442,5157,09021,697
79,184
8874,01822,992
53,334
16,765
14,26044,876
1,084,942
161,530957,88362,918
107,316512250460
25,60417,941
32,2306,911
28,650
ir>,4951,962
28,253
25,8833,958
18,786
1,13332,40845,3009,127
73,831
121,593
3,99812,02839,118
64,990
28,077
37,71344,962
2,010,820
132,184680,62937,134
105,356261297250
6,00330,383
26,189708
24,454
30,485904
28,212
3,215
3,743
64331,79254,66712,21358,383
68,322
3,0803,93354,206
44,262
12,336
12,63948,508
1,515,391
235,6951,543,561
81,750113,7641,2211,1161,48311,3S638,319
51,0033,974
37,725
5,134347
5,346
947384
97,465
2,01442,06085,51115,77588,034
84,002
15,83515,69650,320
230,465
42,696
15.000S8,359
1
3,006,387
i Other than those connected with governor's and agents' conferences and meetings of directors and of the advisory council.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 132: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT.
EarningsCurrent expenses.,
$50,490,73929,559,343
Current net earnings.
Additions to current net earnings:Amounts deducted from re-
serve for—Depreciation on U. S.
bondsProbable losses
Allother
Total additions.
Total.
20,931,396
630,1223S0,9S4328,838
1,339,944
Deductions from current net earn-ings: j
Depreciation allowances on |bank premises I 3,107,295
Furniture and equipment | 7SS, 244Reserve for probable losses j 8SG, 000Reserve for self insurance j 444,072Reserve for depreciation on }
U. S.bonds jAll other j
78,058469,935
Total deductions.
Net deductions from current netearnings
Net earnings available for divi-dends, francliise tax, and surplus
Dividends paidFranchise tax paid U . S . Govern-
ment.
5,773,604
4,433,660
16,497,736
6,307,035
7,450,5432,7-10,158
Boston.
$3,541,3132,022,400
$11,341,3196,776,530
1,518,913
32,100
41,594
328,215133,106
1,784
1,097,402
Transferred to surplus account —
MEMORANDA. \
Amounts added to surplus ac- !count through rcvorsal of ]charges previously made for— ,
Depreciation allowances onbank promises 2,630,277
Reserve for undetermined |liabilities... . . . . . - ; 1,000,000
Amounts deducted from surplusaccount and paid to U. S. Gov-ernment as a franchise tax for1921 • '3,400,002
481,951
538,88376,568
NewYork.
4,564,789
Philadel-phia.
$4,251,9502,053,919
2,198,031
Cleve-land.
$4,994,2822,461,266
2,533,016
2,743 I
67,732
*i4,*946
2,743 ! 82,678
365,05350,172 | 42,931
294,072
"i36,*642" 902
845,939 43,833
843,196 I * 38,845
3,721,593 2,236,876
1,652,138 541,552
1,862,509206,916
855,361839,960
247,350
1,000,000
'1,604,549 36,366
43,728
48,889
Rich-mond.
$2,832,9441,631,356
1,201,588
3,618
*8,*83i'
125,42842,779
100,000
"'45, 'J5I6'
313,217
12,449
178,35804,71050,00050,000
3,521
346,5S9
264,32S ]
2,268,688
692,436
714,OSS861,264
334, U0
867,448
333,321
480,71453,413
125,000 225,277
20,459
Atlanta,
$2,352,7361,293,053
1,059,683
2,590
4,413
163,29117,387
200,000
10,685
Chicago. St. Louis.
$6,748,803 $2,456,4474,080,057 1,623,222
Minne-apolis.
$1,969,2481,034,942
2,668,806 I 833,225 884,305
144,554300,000127,465
572,019
3,883
2,257
6,140
1,400,000238,921
2,00044,755125,000
196, CS7 20,03S
391,306 I 1,835,610 j 191,793
3S0,953 I 1,263,591 ! 185,653
672,730 I l,40.i,215 ( 647,572
256,618 j 876,203 2S-V6G
374,501 470,11141,611 52,901
87,95627«, 450
213,629
2,030,000 i
710,190 j
41,231
41,231
KansasCity.
$3,094,6602,010,820
1,083,840
95,999
5,960
101,959
9,71324,640 !
337,81060,128
78,0T>S30,431 4,825
142,842 j 402,703
Dallas.
$2,085,7751,515,391
570,384
231,52380,984
1107,113
419,620
161,01832,710439,000
3,151
SanFrancisco.
635,879
52,423 208,170 |.
$4,821,2023,006,387
1,814,815
4,395
1,814
6,209
36,40636,00372,000
16,259
160,668
250,000
306,926
to
S
1 Includes $55,000 representing excess of sale price over net book value of okl bank building sold during the year.
to
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 133: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
REIMBURSABLE EXPENDITURES OF FISCAL AGENCY DEPARTMENT.
Expenditures during 1922:Salaries ,All other '
Amounts reimbursable Jan. 1,1922
Total . . .Reimbursements received during
1922
Balance reimbursable Jan, 1,1923
Total.
$099,14448*, 67163,113
1,216,928
878,685
368,243
Boston.
$10,03723,7092,216
65,962
40,471
25,491
NewYork.
$12,093167,196
3,910
213,199
102,887
110,312
Philadel-phia.
$27,47026,1992,101
55,770
41,393
14.377
Cleve-land.
$58,72531,6227,148
107,495
72,767
34,728
Rich-mond.
$25,45015,4541,299
42,203
35,843
6,360
Atlanta.
$29,60317,4453,485
50,533
41,784
8,749
Chicago.
$89,53672,81111,488
173,835
134,094
39,741
St. Louis.
$53,98721,8125,280
81,079
55,911
25,168
Minne-apolis.
$104,36744,6628,737
157,766
129,734
28,032
KansasCity.
$107,95225,41110,319
143,682
109,900
33,782
Dallas.
$12,82812,1623,113
58,103
51,429
6,674
SanFrancisco.
$57,09626,1884,017
97,301
62,472
34,829
to
i
d
i
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 134: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
DISCOUNT AND INTEREST RATES.
In the following table are presented actual discount and interest rate3 pre-vailing during the 30-day period ending January 15, 1923, in the various citiesin which the several Federal reserve banks and their branches are located.A complete description of the several types of paper for which quotations aregiven will be found in the September, 1918, and October, 1918, FEDERALRESERVE BULLETIN.
A comparison of the discount and interest rates for prime commercial paperprevailing in the various centers during the 30-day period ending January 15and the 30-day period ending December 15 shows relatively little change, butrates for interbank loans, bankers' acceptances, and collateral loans were re-ported lower in some centers. Compared with the 30-day period January 15,1922, all rates are lower in almost all cities.
DISCOUNT AND INTEREST RATES PREVAILING IN VARIOUS CENTERS DURING THE 30-DAY PERIOD ENDING JANUARY 15, 1923.
Prime commercial paper.
District. j City. Customers'. Open market.
No. 1...No. 2. . .
No.3 . .No. 4..
No. 5..
No. 6..
No. 7..
No .3 . .
No. 9...
No. 10.,
No. 11..
No. 12...
30 to 90days.
//. L. aBoston . J 5 -4J 5
I New York* 8 4H2-5i Buffalo 7 5 6
PhiladelphiaClevelandPittsburghCincinnatiRichmondBaltimoreAtlantaBirminghamJacksonvilleNew OrleansNashvilleChicagoDetroitSt. LouisLouisvilleMemphisLittle RockMinneapolisHelenaKansas CityOmahaDenverOklahoma CityDallasEl Paso 10HoustonSan Francisco..PortlandSeattleSpokaneSalt Lake City.Los Angeles—
6 4J 57 4| 66 5 66 5 6
5 G66 58 48 5 6-7715 6J8 4f5j8 0 76 41 5-516 5 516 4 516 41 66 5 67 6 65 5 58 7 87 5 G7J5 618 6 6-7
10 41 7
4 to 6months.
/ / . L, C.5
30 to yodays.
4 to 6months.
5 4JI //. X. C. ! / / . X. C.I 5 4J 41 i 5 41 4J| 5 41 41-4* 5 4i 41-5
415141 65 651 651 65 5}
66-76167
G 4 | 5-516 5 51G V 516. 5 G
6 55 4141
5 5 5; 51 41 41i
\'h"h"h"" 'h"h 5| 6 5 51 G 51 6
51 5 51 > 51 5 5
Interbankloans.
/ / . X. C.5 41 56 41 4f-58 5 616 5
651
7 48 571571 58 6
67 6 6
! 51 5 5118 7 8! 7 5 6
715 618 6 6-7
101 G
751
. 5 66 5 5-518 41 78 5 618 51 6i-78 6 78 4i 6
to7 5 G6 5 5J8 41 78 G 618 G 7
41 4 45 4} 45 441 41 4;
41 4 41; 5 4J 4 i -
4|-5 i 51 4} 55 414}
5 41 5 5 41 41-5
3
f.«»541G5 44? 41 4141 4* 4_41 4 SiC 41 5-51 4 4
41 4i
"in'5*41*41*5 4 '
: 6 45 4i4? 441 45 4.6 5"
10 8 8"
6 6 66 5 5-51f> 4} 6' " 51
Bankers' acceptances,60 to 90 days.
Indorsed. Unin-dorsed.
II. X. C. II. L. C.4 !44 4 4 ! 4 | 4
41 4 4-41 5i 444-4&
I 5 1 5 54 | 4J 41 ! 4 i 4 4J41 4 4 j 4* 4 4
Collateral loans—stock exchange.
Demand, i 3 months.
- . . . . I
3 to 6months.
Cattleloans.
Secured bywarehousereceipts.
// . X. C.
8 5 68 5 661 G 67 5 68 G 6
5-51515 516 5 516 5 66 51 66 51 6
51 517 8
6 5 6 7 5
51 4* 41 5 * 4 1 *
5167666G66S8771
5315415555555
?
54-5656651-665165-66161
4 4 4 14 4 4
; 5 5 5
51
41 41 4 M H F M * 44-41[ 5 4 M 1 5 4J 41: 5 41 4j ( 5 41 41
fil Rl AL
687 5 671 51 618 "> G8 6 77 5 69 6 85 41 4
; 41414141 , 5 4141
6 415-516 5 66 51516 5 66 5 6
i 7 6 6! 61 51 6
: s s s7 5 6
??7 6 6 ! 7 6 6 [10 3 G
6 1 61 6 1
41
51 517 6 661 G 617 6 77 6 67 5 6
41 45 4 4}: 7 4 i 4{• 51 4 5 [ 4 4 4j 7 6 6 1 - 7 [ 7 6 7I I
41 31 4 | 4J 4 4
8 6 6110 8 8S 7 5 6! 6 5 51-6! 8 4 7I 8 6 6! 8 6 6-8
8 7 7• 7 5 6
// . X. C.i 51 5 5116 41 5
7 5 66 5 56 5 66 5 66 51 51-6
16 5 66 5 5J7 41 68 5 6-771 51 771 5 68 6 7
| 6 41 5-5J6 5 66 41 51
! 6 5 6i 6 6 6
8 6 761 51 68 7 88 5 6
: 71 51 618 5 6
10! 8 6,10 8
7 5 616 6 6
8 5 7; 8 4} 7. 8 6 7I 8 7 7; 8 5 61
6 87
II. L. C.51 5 516 4156 5 66 41 56 5 6 :6 5 6 j6 C 66 5 66 5 517 41 68 6 671 51 61 j715 6 18 6 7 I6 41 5-516 5 66 41 516 5 67 6 68 6 761 51 68 7 88 5 6
II. L. C. II. L. C.
Ordinaryloans to
customerssecured by
Libertybonds.
6 5 5-516 5 517 51 G6 6 6
10 G S8 6 7
10 8 8
6 5 68 6 68 6 88 6 78 7 78 5 61
! 8 G 6-871 51 61
! 8 5 6-710 G 8! 8 6 71,10 8 8"
7 6 76 6 6
17 61 616 6 G
. 8 6 7; 8 s s
8 61 6J
5 56 7G 65 6
c887188666667788718108107
888810
5566565515666518515156686666
5*t6
516661675-5166666-7G86616-786187G77r
n. L. c.41 41 4 |
; 6 4J 41-51 6 5 6'! 6 415i 6 5 6I 6 6 6
6 5 5-516 41 66 5 518 41 G8 6 67 5 77 5 517 6 66 41 56 5 66 41516 5 66 6 67 5 65 5 n
: 8 8 sI 7 416; 7 6 6118 5 610 6 8[ 8 5 610 8 8t 5 41 5I 6 5 51-6j 8 6 7! 8 6 7! 8 618 6
8 51 61
Iito
m a t e s for demand paper secured by prime bankers ' acceptances-high, 51; low, 3J; customary, 4-5.
toOSCO
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 135: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
270 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FBBRUAKY, 1923.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES.[General index for January, 1923 (preliminary), 68; for December, 1922 (preliminary), 70; for January, 1922,65. Noon buying rates for cable transfers
in New York as published by Treasury. Rates in cents per unit of foreign currency.]
COUNTRIES INCLUDED IN COMPUTATION OF INDEX.
BelgiumDenmarkFranceGreat BritainItalyNetherlandsNorwaySpainSwedenSwitzerland
Canada
Argentina.BrazilChile
China.India..Japan.
Monetary unit.
Franc.Krone..Franc.Pound.Lira...Florin..Krone...Peseta..Krona..Franc ,
Dollar
Peso (gold)....MUreisPeso (paper)..
Shanghai tael.RupeeYen
Par ofexchange.
19.3026. SO19.30
486.6519.3040.20£6.8019.3026.8019.30
100.00
96.4832.44
U9.63
* 60.8548.6649. S5
Low
Janu-ary.
5.120018- 73005.8200
463.31004.7000
39.3700IS. 410015.530026.06001S.5S00
9S.S750
S3.570011.190011.9800
70.730031.110048.3000
Decem-ber.
6.420020.38006.9700
451.98004.S200
39.5200IS.490015.360026.900018.7100
93.5005
83.750011.620011.8500
70.450030.030048.5100
High.
Janu-ary.
6.810020.55007.4100
467.73005.1700
39.720019.050015.790027.020018.9500
99.6181
85.680011.670013.3200
72.850033.200048.9600
Decem-ber.
6.950020.99007.6100
467.90005.1300
40.130019.2-? 0015.790027,030019.0000
99.9874
86.370012.240013.0500
72.070031.110048.9900
Average.
Janu-ary.
! Decem-I ber.
6.076519.79386.6769
465.46114.8792
39.564218.666515.660026.861018.7831
99.0943
84.7354 I11.3796 !12.8177 !
71.933131.720248.7454
6.644820.67007.2296
460.9S005.034039.836818.939615.635626.948418.9100
99.4484
85.568811.945212.4064
71.044430.G48848.8500
Index (per centof par) .i
Janu-ary.
3L4873.8634.6095.6525.2898.4269.6581.14
100.2397.32
99.09
87.8335.0865.63
107.6065.2097.78
Decem-ber.
34.4377.1337.4694.732G.0899.1070.6781.01
100.5597.98
99.45
88.6936.8263.52
106.2762.9997.99
OTHER COUNTRIES.
Monetary unit. Par ofexchange.
Low.
Janu-ary.
Decem-ber.
High.
Janu-ary.
Decem-ber.
Average,
Janu-ary.
Decem-ber.
Index (per centof par) .i
Janu-ary.
Decem-ber.
AustriaBulgariaCzechoslovakiaFinlandGermanyGreece... . . .HungaryPoland.;PortugalRumaniaYugoslavia
Uruguay..
China.HongkongStraits Settlements.
Krone..Lev.KroneMarkkaReichsmark..Drachma... . .Krone ,Polish mark..,EscudoLeuDinar ,
20.2619.30
10.3023.8219.3020.26
Cuba Peso. . . .Mexico do..
.do..
Mexican dollar..DollarSingapore dollar.
108.0519.3019.30
100.0049.85
103.42
3 48.11M7.77
56.78
0.0014.6586
2.77052.46S9.0021
1.1588.0373.0027
4.4600.3728.6955
99.900048.5417
82.3100
51.710052.7700£2.9600
0.0014.6783
2.72562.488S.0118
1.0000.0390.0054
4.2500.5775
1.0750
99.887548.3125
SO. 9800
51.420052.500051.9600
0.0014.7143
3.09252.5100.0139
1.28(33.0411.00.57
4.7900.5906
1.0864
100.000049.2031
85.6400
52.750053.960054.7100
0.0014.7180
3.18782.5263.0186
1.4200.0437.00604.8500.63381.4014
100.050048.7625
85.4500
52.900054.050053.6700
0.0014.69472.85562.4807.00731.2206.0392.00434.6050.5194.9560
99.950848.9082
84.6050
52.298553.424654.1412
1 Based on average.. * 1913 average.
SILVER.
[Average price per fine ounce.J
0.0014.6997
3.09692.5124.0136
1.2337.0430.0057
4.5212.6111
1.2231
99.945048.4468
84.2120
52.028853.228853.0100
0.013.60
0.013.63
12.85.03
6.32.19
13.02
6.39.21
4.262.694.95
99.9598.11 i
4.183.176.34
99.0597.19
81.81 ! 81.43
108.71111.8495.35
108.15111.4393.36
January.
London (converted at average rate of exchange).New York
50.66978.06094
December.
$0.65104.64250
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 136: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDEKAL, RESERVE BULLETIN. 271
FINANCIAL STATISTICS FOR PRINCIPAL FOREIGN COUNTRIES*
A summary of banking and financial conditions abroad is presented statistically in theaccompanying tables.
ENGLAND.
[Amounts in millions of pounds sterling.]
Note accounts a n dBank of England de-posits.
London clearingbanks.*
Average of end of monthfigures:
1913192019211922
1922,end of—JanuaryOctoberNovemberDecember
i l ,370! 15' 3,252 1,078
309 I 1,768 ( 2,911 1,139- n I * ™ • 3 097 I 796
118.2123,0J124.6125. 8
1,1921,0331,031
J,031
i Held by the Bank of England and by the Treasury as note reserve.* Less notes in currency notes account.* Average weekly figures.< Statist.* Bankers Magazine.* Excluding Germany.
FRANCE.
[Amounts in millions of francs*)
Average of end of month figures:1913192019211922
1922, end of—January 9OctoberNovemberDecember
1923, end of—January
Bank of France.
Goldre-
serves.1
-3,3433,5863,5683,597
.3,576
.3,6353,6363,670
3,671
Silverre-
serves.
629253274285
280288289289
290
Warad-
vancesto theGov-ern-
ment.
Note | Totalcircu- de-lation. | posits.
26,00025,30023,042
23,00023,60022,90023,600
5,56538,06637,40436,177
36,43336,694 !36,114 I36,359 |
8303,5272,9272,307
2,3922,1702,1842,309
23,100 i 36,780 | 2,208
Government finances.
Gov-ern-
mentrev-
enue.
3201,0051,103
1,3231,5031,2071,311
BonsdelaDe-
fenseNation-
ale.
59,168
In-ternaldebt(in-
cludingBonsdelaDe-
fenseNation-
ale).
35,000
Priceof 3 per
centper-
petualrente.
86.7757.3456.5658.48
56.5558.2559.0059.02
58. SO
Aver-age
dailyclear-ings
of theParis
banks.
I New stock and[ bond issues.
Savigsbanks,;excess |ofde- :posits
with-draw-als ( - ) .
59 - 6 5554 +48550 I +67525 j +53
489 +41556 ] +17783 ( +43630 j +33
Value.Aver-
age ratoof
return.
4,6541,100
791421179
6.70
6.666.416.59
i Not including gold held abroad.* Converted to francs at par.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 137: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
272 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1928.
ITALY.
[Amounts in millions of lire.]
Average of end ofmonth figures:
1913*1920...19211922
1921, end of—December
1922, end of—SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
! Banks of issue.
Reserves.
Gold.
1,3751,0431,074
1,092
1,1251,1361,141
Total.
1,6612,0882,020
1,999
2,0242,0392,034
Loansanddis-
counts.
8576,3357,586
10,088
8,8589,082
! Note; circulation.
i For ac-count
ofcom-
merce.
2,2847,0359,304
10,304
9,9249,7829,892
Forac-
countof theState.
10,5819,064
8,505
8,0668,0758,074
Totalde-
posits.
3182,4742,475
3,103
2,6612,638
Leading private banks.*
Cash.
1291,3081,200
1,997
769781
Loansanddis-
countsinclud-
ingtreas-ury
bills.
1,09310,59410,677
8,012
8,7068,659
Duefromcorrtvspond-ents.
9145,9455,575
3,785
3,4603,568
Par-ticipa-tions.
55446465
316
337339
Totalde-
posits.
1,67415,81016,001
12,502
11,89711,960
•
Government finances.
Short-termtreas-ury
bills.
13,200
21,926
25,574
For-eigndebt.
Totalpublicdebt.*
21,245 109,092
Princi-palrev-
enuesduring
month.*
1,019
1,458
6821,354
7301,442
Indexnum-
bers ofsecurityprices.*
87.12
80.13
105.68109.9011L94112.91
1 Includes Banca Commerciale Italiana, Credito Italiano, Banco di Roma, and until November, 1921 Banca Italiana di Sconto.* Includes paper circulation of the State and of banks on account of the State.»Revenues from State railways; from post, telegraph, and telephone; from State domain; from import duties on grain; and from Government
sales of sugar are not included from November, 1921.* Figures for 1921 based on quotations of Dec. 31,1920^100; those for 1922 on quotations of Dec. 31,1921-100.* End of December figures.
GERMANY.
, {Amounts in millions of marks.]
Reichsbank.
Goldre-
serve.
Average of end of monthfigures:
1913192019211922
1922 end of—January ,OctoberNovember *.December
1923, end of—January
1,0681 0921,0561,002
9961,0051,0051,005
1,005
Notecir-
culation.
1,95853,96480,952
339,677
115,376469,457754,086
,280,095
,934,496
Totalde-
posits.
Dis-counted
Treasurybills.
66817,70220,213
108,633
23,412140,779240,969530,526
762,264
Com-mer-cial
*$?count-
ed.
Totalclear-ings.
47,98083.133
338,147 72,211
126,161477,201672,222
1,184,464
1,609,081
1,592101,155246,949422,235
697,216
6,13657,89889,297
530,647
116,680789,341
1,463,7662,078,969
Dar-lehns-
kassen-scheinein cir-cula-tion.
13,1458,861
11,217
8,04614,00913,80913,450
13,395
Government finances.
Re- .ceiptsfrom
taxes.
207
6,285
8,80250,175
103,658132,615
Rev-enue
ofStaterail-
ways.
13
2,358
4,41558,16192,959122,785
Treasurybillsout-
standing.
Valueof newstockand
bondissuesplacedon Ger-man
market.
1220
192,832475,835
255,678614,000839,000
1,495,000
2,082,000
2,655
4,8317,187
15,223
Index of secur-i ty prices.*
25stocks.
Per cent Percent.
100169
1,334
1,378
10 do-mesticbonds.
100105
312
322
> End of March, 1913.fi^K?6?1?^?*^ b y t^e Frankfurter Zeitung, using as base (100) prices for January, 1922, instead of for January, 1921, and eliminating thenve Donas in foreign currencies. Figures are as of beginning of month.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 138: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
FKBRCARY, 1923. FEDERAL, RESERVE BULLETIN. 273
SWEDEN.
[Amounts in millions of kronor.]
Averages of end of monthfigures:
19131192019211922
1921, end of—December
1922, end of—SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1923—January
Government Protested billsfinances. during month.
Fund-1 Float-ed i ing i Num
State i State | bcr.debt. debt.
> End of December figures.
CANADA.
[Amounts in millions of dollars.]
Average of end of month figures:1921 . .1922
1921, end of—
MarchApril .May.
. July . .
1922, end of—
April\fav
JUly
December
Goldcoinandbul-
lion.i
7275
747570747470707069696970
707070707070707071879293
Chartered Banks.
Cur-rent
loansanddis-
counts.
1.4031,272
1,4381.4291,4451,441
' 1.4311.4121,3921,3771,3911,4001,3541,319
1,2871,2991,3011,3141,2851,2661,2481,2481.2501,2761,2551,230
Moneyat call
andshort
notice.
282280
304303282264269277268264290277297288
261273267278288274272277279301303284
Publicandrail-waysecu-rities.
369332
362361355362394388386374361346372366
361352354343313319323331322;uo317341
Notecir-
cula-tion.
195166
206207206203193196193184187194182185
163164163165156166152158177179170176
i1
Individ-ualde-
posi ts-do-
mandand
time.
2,1252,009
2,2162,1862,1802,1342,1372,1532,0952,0752,0942,1012,0932,052
1,9251,9871,9812,0002,0592,0532,0161,9791,9852,0202,0362,061
Government finances.
Goldre-
serves
min-ion,
notes.
8590
OS9980818384R58181818281
818181SI83So8789919396
129
Do-min-ionnotecir-
cula-tion.
272240
294290278264257269263262260254287231
255247241242222233231229235240251257
Totalnet
debt.
2,335
2,3032,3072,311
2,3172,3492,3582,3452,3332,3292,3692; 367
2,3732,3722,385
2,3912,3972,3932,3882,3842,3702,3922,412
Rev-enue.
35
393532
6325332742263029
242528
! 57, 29
313032343430
Ex-pend-iture.
28
282024
4233232521196217
281828
4530202024175432
Dankclear-ings.8
1,4541,353
1,4871,3101,3471,4481,5241.4S21,3741,2921,3431,5461,6671,633
1,3491,1491,3461,1931,4971,3231,2781,1721,2531,4971,6191,555
Newin-cor-
pora-tions.
J1515
1417162518131710121219
111715101920121511181416
1
Busi-nessfail-ures.
•4773
504535413134454345585972
00899059076460646572
' 7683
1 Includes gold in central gold reserve but not gold held abroad.* Total for month.»Weekly average.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 139: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
274 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN". F E B R U A R Y , 1 9 2 3 .
ARGENTINA.
[Amounts in millions of pesos.]
End of—1913191919201921
1921, end of—November
1922, end of—AugustSeptember. \October jNovember i
Banco de la Naci6n.
Cash.
Gold
Clearingsin
BuenosAires
(paper).
823 1 1,4711,177 I 2,8051,363 ! 3,6121,363 | 3,482
1,363 I 2,133
1,363 I1,363 '1,363 '
2,5702,7252,827
Liabili-ties
underbank-
ruptciesduringmonth.
1435
13
13
71011
1 Includes Banco de la Nacidn.* Figures for 1919 include 79,000,000 pesos, and for succeeding years 4,000,000 pesos, held in foreign legations.
JAPAN.
[Amounts in millions of yen ]
Average of end of month figures:191319211922
1922, end of—JanuaryOctoberN ovGmbftrDecember
1923, end of—January
. ..,_ . .....
Bank of Japan.
Speciere-
servefor
notes.1
2161,2001,172
1,2411,0681,0661,064
1,062
Loansanddis-
counts.
47107208
224160183375
ISO
Ad-vances
onforeignbills.
333994
56142141205
159
Notecir-cula-tion.
3631,2261,291
1,3771,23612411,590
1,303
Gov-ern-ment
depos-its in
Japan.
Pri-vate
Idepos-1 its inJapan.
297409
277437445333
380
5036
35334066
34
Tokyo tanks. | G£*™^
Cashon
hand.
""129"
no126126169
113
Totalloans.
3331,9321,961
1,9841,9261,9292,011
2,002
Totaldepos-
its.
*1*7S9"
1,7431,8121,8281,869
1,860
Totalclear-ings.
3642,5722,834
2,2462,6972,9713,329
2,246
Aver- •age ! Inter-, Ex-dis- • nal iternal
count i loans, i loans,rate. ;
8.389.009.31
9.029.389.459.34
1,0751,956
1
1,4841,044
Capi-tal
issuesin
Japan.
32"186
83
Indexof se-curityprices.1
194
196160
1 Includes gold credits abroad, coin and bullion in Japan. 1 Tokyo market.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 140: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1023. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 275
CONDITION OF PRINCIPAL EUROPEAN BANKS OF ISSUE, 1913-1922.BANK OF ENGLAND.
[Combined data for issue and banking departments.)
[From the London Economist and weekly statements of the Bank of England.)
[In thousandwS of pounds.]
Dec. 31, ! Dec. 30, Doc. 29,1913. ' 1914. 1915.
ASSETS.
Gold and silverGovernment securities:
Held by issue departmentHeld by banking department..
Other securities
Total.
34,9&3 \ 69,493 j 51,470
IS, 450 ; 18,450; 18,45013,199 14,808 ! 32,84052,138 100,236 I 112,070
118,770 I 208,9S7 | 214,842
LIABILITIES.
Proprietors' capitalRest (surplus)Fnblic depositsOther depositsSeven-day and other bills..Notes in circulation
TotalRatio of metallic reserve to deposit and
note liabilities combined—per cent
14,553 ;3,252 (
10,25G !61,087 ;
1429,608
118,770
Dec. 27, I Dec. 26,1916. I 1917.
Doc. 25,1918.
Dec. 31,1919.
54,305
18,45057,188
106,461
58,337 | 79,111
18,45058,30394,889
18,4.5071,10092,140
91,342
18,45092,469106,778
Doc. 29,1920.
12S,268
J8,450107,86586,028
Dec. 28,1921.
128,434
18,45036,96283,165
267,011
14,5533,283
2o,933123,055
2436,139
14,5533,312
49,677111,973
1835,309
34.65 i 36.36
208,987 I 214,842
26.14
236,404 229,979 j 260,807 309,039
14,5533,31152,116126,727
2239,675
14,5533,30142,009124,162
1045,944
236,404 j 229,979
24.85 ! 27.50
14,5533,25723,643149,037
1070,307
260,507
32.56
14,5533,27219,213180,638
1391,350
14,5533,340
14,305175,554
8132,851
14,5533,334
16,057100,532
15126,520
309,039 !
31.37
340,611
39.75
267,011
51.56
Dec. 27,1922.
127,443
18,45051,96878,153
276,019
14,5533,345
13,324119,903
16124,878
276,019
49.38
BANK OF FRANCE.
[From weekly statements of the Bank of France.]
[In thousands of francs.]
Gold in vault.
Dec. 26,1913.
3,517,392Other metallic reserve 610,063
Total metallic vault reserve. 4,157,455
300,000
Dec. 10,1914.
4,141,757351,034
4,492,791
300,000
Gold held abroad.Foreign creditsGovernment securities:
Permanent investmentsAdvances to Government I I
since outbreak of war 3,600,000Treasury bills discounted (ad- f i
vances to foreign Govern-ments) ,
Other Government securities.Loans and discounts - —Bills matured and extendedAdvances on bullion, specie, se-
curities, etcBank premisesSundry assets -. —
117,9581,526,462 213,291
3,637,514
772,403 *7S0,75S44 230
320,005
Total 7,238,513
LIABILITIES.
182,500
42,519
CapitalSurplus (including special re-
serves)Amortization account (laws 1914,
1917,1918)Dividends unpaidGovernment depositsOther depositsBank notes in circulationSundry liabilities
TotalRatio of metallic reserve to de-
posit and note liabilities com-bined—per cent
Dec. 30,1915.
5,015,287352,088
Dec. 2S,1916.
5,367,375
3,382,827294,809
1,056,790
300,000
5,000,000
630,000113,378 I429,321
1,834,206 ]
1,151,916 |50,272 |
363,233 !
3,677,0961,693, OSS
825.801
300,000
7,400,000
1,800,000112,652G10,GS4
1,338,833
1,317,75346,086502,718
16,296,500 19,634,311
182,500 j 182,500 j
\ 42,964 !
182,500
42,964
Dec. 27,1917.
Dec. 26,1918.
3,314,417217,657
3,562,0742,037,108
778,307
300,000
12,500,000
3,440,460318,318
3,758,8082,037,10S2,336,472
300,000
17,150,000
3,220,000 3,526,000112,979 112,729918,257 ! 1,052,336
1,140,832 i 1,028,568
1,224,79846,295627,520
1,215,71546,425
1,550,272
26,468,260 |34,114,433
Dec. 20,1919.
Dec. 30,1920.
3,600,215 ! 3,551,902208,035 ! 266,333
3,808,280 3, SIS, 2351,978,278 ! 1,918,3671,296,616 I 677,970
300,000 : 300,000
25,500,000 26,600,000
3,755,000112,913
1,280.361626,438
1,464,33147,261
1,927,158
I
182,500 I
42,961 ;
1,601403,359579,255
5,713,551315,728
2,671,951 2,123,814
441,658
7,238,513
62.09
176,557 ;21,818173,S96 ,
25,147 I 25,831, 15,009 i 251,8591 2,264,892 ! 2,917,555
9i9S6;042 13,309,850 16,678,818 122,336,799rt ' 424,981 710,752
182,500 I
42,961
437,4155,010
111,6842,368,61630,249,612| 716,602
42,162,636
182;500
42,972
702,9345,197
! 76,497! 3,129,393137,274,510' 748,603
3,980,000114,819
3,311,32*403,033
2,201,79546,655
1,579,028
44,9S2,132
Dec. 29,1921.
Dec. 28,1922.
3,575,861 3,G70,484279,765 289,464
3,855,626 3,959,94S1,918,367 1,864,345
623,733 600,822
300,000 ! 300,000
24,GOO,OOO ;23,600,000
4,112,000 4,355,000114,839 I 142,813
2,506,977 ! 2,402,46057,240 ! 28,707
2,210,918 ! 2,0S2(07654,460 j 107,6S0
2,117,383 I 1,980,030
42,561,543 41,423,881
116,296,500 119,634,311 126,468,260 '3-4,114,433
182,500
54,917
1,011,62828,95156,575
3,519,46137,901,5992,196,501
182,500 I 182,500
42,162,630
35.00 34.39 i 19.40 ! 13.97 I 11.48 9.56
72,618
1,829,02216,(HS26,014
2,718,01830,487,4571,229,866
44,982,132
84,754
1,335,38329,83120,482
2,289,66736,359,2871,121,977
42,561,543 41,423,881
9.21 ! 9.83 I 10.24
* No data available as at end of 1914. Incomplete data for Dec. 10 taken from report of Minister of Finance.• Advances on securities only.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 141: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/141.jpg)
276 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
GERMAN REICHSBANK.
[From annual reports and weekly statements of the Reichsbank.l
[In thousands of marks.]
I Dec. 31,1913.
ASSETS.
GoldOther metallic reserve.
Dec. 31,1914.
Dec. 31,1915.
.11,169,971 2,092,811 2,445,185
.| 276,832. 36,865 32,073
Total metallic vault re-serve
Imperial Treasury and LoanBank certificates
Notes of other banksBills and checksDiscounted Treasury billsAdvances on collateralSecuritiesSundry assets
!l,446,S03 12,129,676
! 46,202 i| 12,765 !}l,490,749
94,473403,410225,135
875,0005,312
3,936,568
22,87033,972215,013
2,477,253
1,287,8653,130
5,803,31412,93951,375
272,229
Total 3,719,537 J7,218,411 9,903,110 13,447,674
-LIABILITIES.
Capital paid inSurplusNotes in circulationGovernment and other Federal
depositsOther depositsSundry liabilities
TotalRatio of metallic reserve to de-
posit and note liabilities com-bined—per cent
I 180,00070,048
2,593,445
1793,120
. 82,924
180,00074,479
5,045,899
1,756,907
161,126
3,719,537
42.72
7,218,411
31.31
Dec. 30,1916.
2,520,47316,319
2,536,792
422,0891,394
9,609,7679,758
83,749784,125
Dec. 31,1917.
Dec. 31,191S.
Dec. 31,1919.
Dec. 31, Dec. 31,1920. ' 1921.
2,406,5S6 2,262,219 •181,350 19,948 :
1,089,49920,520
2,587,936
1,314,790674
14,596,1065,111
89,1612,091,394
2,282,167 ! 1,110,019
111, 025,2571^74
1,091,636 !5,773 i
Dec. 30,1922.
995,39211,612 j
1,004,84369,195
5,266,9192,908
27,415,7125,637
156,0732,390,080
20,685,172
180,00080,550
6,917,922
2,359,012
370,6269,908,110
26.70
180,00085,471
8,054,652
4,564,206
563,34513,447,674
20.10
41,744,5349,940
163,9332,459,598
1,097,409
123,416.674I 1", 624|60,634,023i 4,438i 183,590
9,728,125
37,519,496 56,515,305 95,065,853
1,007,004
6,963,6072,084
/ 1,061,754\132,330,906
8,476195,912
8,220,979
1,074,035
238,481,10510,393
422,235,2961,184,464,-359
773,974469,972
78,822,505
149,790,722 1,926,331,642
ISO, 000 | 180,00090,137 | 94,828
11,467,749 >22,1S7,815
8,050,389
896,897
13,280,398
1,776,455
180,00099,496
35,698,369
17,071,857
3,465,583
| 180,000104,258
68,805,008
22,327,114
| 3,649,503
180,000121,413
113,639,464/ 7,591,343\25,314,330
2,944,172
20,685,172 37,519,496 J56,515,305 |95,065,8S3 j 149,790,722 1,926,331,642
13.26 6.43 2.10 ! 1.20
180,000127,264
1,280,094,831
153,190,991377,335,296
115,403,260
.06
BANK OF BELGIUM.
[From weekly statements of the Bank of Belgium.1
[In thousands of francs.)
Dec. 31,1913.
Gold :Silver
Total metallic vault reserveForeign exchange and foreign creditsBills discountedPublic securitiesInvestment of surplusAdvances on national public securities. .*.Loans secured by foreign creditsProvincial bonds taken over by the State (law of Nov. 4,1919)Funds held for the National Institution of Savings
249,02756,367
Dec. 30,1919.
Dec. 29,1920.
266,40926,902
305,394166,625634,79558,51841,24061,419
11,823 :
293,31159,744
392,30361,05247,53862,83184,955
480,000
Advances to the Government for the retirement of German marks i : 5, SOO, 000Bank premises, furniture, and fixtures, net, i. e., less depreciation | 14,974 15,391" - J "" 9,447 2,454Sundry assets
Total
LIABILITIES.
1,304,265 ! 7,299,584
*|
50,00041,781
1,067,407
CapitalSurplusNotes in circulationDeposits in current account:
Government, including specie deposits ' 9 585Other. ! 117 098
Funds due to the National Institution of Savings "."."..II!!! n'907Sundry liabilities
50,00047,579
4,763,802
217,9322,216,665
Total.Ratio of metallic reserve to deposirand'n'oYe'UabU^^^
6,487 I 3,600
1,304,26525.58
7,299,5844.07
266,51927,920
294,43928,481756,68861,87048,749126,73184,653480,000
5,500,00015,5872,601
7,399,799
50,00048,750
6,119,239
89,4641,085,149
7,197
7,399,7994.04
Dec. 29,1921.
206,5S440,490
307,07420,684425,97262,77550,175
120,19484,653480,000
5,500,00014,9602,592
7,039,079
50,00050,175
6,289,576
168,073509,109
2,146
7,069,0794.41
Dec. 2S,1922.
268,91754,887
323,80418,169
634,54564,00351,698
129,50284,653
480,000
5,500,00015,4103,039
7,301,823
50,00051,698
6,700,886
215.902283i 010
3,327
7,304,8234.50
NOTE.—Figures for 1914-191S not available.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 142: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/142.jpg)
FEBRUARY, 1923. FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. 277
BANK OF NETHERLANDS.
[From annual reports and weekly statements of the Bank of Netherlands.]
[In thousands of florins.]
Dec* 27,1913.
Dec. 24,1914.
Dec. 31,1915.
Dec. 30,1916.
Dec. 29,1917.
Dec. 28,1918.
Dec. 27,1919.
Dec. 27,1920.
Dec. 27,1921.
Dec. 27,1922.
Gold coin and bullion.Silver .t
151,4909,016
208,1203,491
429,1826,195
587,6026,985
698,2337,028
689,4418,545
637,3236,103
636,14121,190
605,9698,241
581,790.8,990
Total metallic vault reserve -Domestic b illsForeign billsAdvancesGovernment securitiesOther securitiesBank premisesSundry assets
160,50667,50414,30086,0269,2358,9682,0001,196
211,611154,785
667133,353
4,2408,9991,800
10 719
435,37776,3482,506
93,579
"*8*925"1,600
24,812
594,58766,6858,024
85,50511 5779,0961.400
71,087
705,26181,8198,039
107,448
"9," 078*1,465
65,313
697,686243,691
8,930139,515
3 7298,8561,770
89 108
643,426168,86248,354
250,11612,2418,4563,312
40,656
657,331196,82452,754
247,60513,8328,3673,594
22,453
614,210270,18633,794
124,55413,4749.2423,747
19,238
590,780217,19275,399
126,77714,93996554,522
25,022
Total. 349,735 526,174 643,147 847,961 | 978,423 1,193,585 | 1,175,423 1,202,760
LIABILITIES.
CapitalSurplusNotes in circulation * —Order certificates (bank assignation)Government depositsOther depositsSundry liabilities
20,0005,000
312,6951,522
20,0005,003
473,1071,599
4,3336,185
17,4559,010
20,0005,000
577,0563,4695,482
20,0005,155
758,3793,739
24,2897,851
54,5776.111
TotalRatio of metallic reserve to deposit and
note liabilities combined—per cent
349,735
50.38
526,174
43.00
643,147
71.34
847,961
72.80
20,0005,234
890,2733,568
21,584
20,0005,079
1,068,9472,051
32,0485,716
88,4789,030
978,423
74.44
1,193,585
60.20
20,0005,000
1,032,7321,740
20,0005,000
1,072,1461,924
1,088,445
20,0005,387
1,012,8781 0S5
1,064,286
20,0007,336
974 101862
102,34313,608
85,26118,429
30,57318,522
48,96513,022
1,175,423
56.60
1,202,760
56.70
1,058,445
5S.S0
1,064,285
57.19
BANK OF SPAIN.
[From Espaiia Econdmica y Financiera and weekly statements of the Bank of Spain.1
In thousands of pesetas.]
Dec. 27,1913.
Dec. 26,1914.
Dec. 31,1915.
Dec. 30,1916.
Dec. 29,1917.
Dec. 28,191S.
Dec. 27,1919.
Dec. 31,1920.
Dec. 31,1921.
Dec. 30,1922.
ASSETS.
GoldSilver*
Total metallic vault reserve.......Credits abroadLoans, discounts, and advancesGovernment securities.Other securitiesBank premisesSundry assets
Total
LIABILITIES.
CapitalSurplusGovernment depositsOther depositsNotes in circulationSundry liabilities
Total .*•*:•Ratio of metallic reserve to deposit and
note liabilities combined—per cent....
479,220716,488
572,257707,020
867,226752,905
1,250,896741,042
1,966,816710,538
2,228,351642,157
2,445,810630,498
2,457,140573,567
2,512,869625,042
2,524,754645,594
1,195,708193,650785,432594,43211,65514,84871,137
1,279,277147,534802,179594,43211,65515,081124,273
1,620,131103,195667,365594,43211,65513,088
137,597
1,991,93890,170
671,060594,43811,65514,250
104,664
2,677,35489,392
731,428594,43811,65514,27660,034
2,S70,50S87,468
1,145,070594,47511,65512,717
202,074
3,076,30866,418
1,621,445594,47511,65511,81521,882
3,030,70782,536
1,903,611594,47511,0559,270
380,555
3,137,91141 754
2,860,128594,47511,6558,82217,196
3,170,34836,665
2,070,494593,57311,6559,59715,310
2,860,862 2,974,431
150,00020,000155,709476,834
1.924,274140,045
150,00020,000
113,237610,531
1,965,068115,595
3,147,463
150,00024,00044,878710,758
2,100,174117,653
3,478,175
150,00026,00044,850760,859
2,360,084136,382
4,178,577
150,00026,00062,757
959,75S2,782,840
197,222
4,923,967
150,00058,00061,831
1,165,9693,316,215171,952
5,403,998
150,00060,000130,121
1,035,0753,856,300
172,502
6,012,809
2,866,862
46.77
2,974,431
47.5S
3,147,463
56.73
3,47S,175
62.92
4,178,577
70.36
4,923,967
63.17
150,00063,00082,549
1,169,4894,326,250221,521
6,671,941
150,00078,000
990,0001,011,8174,244,081
167,147
5,907,642
177,00053,000
307,8201,090,3054,130,958
•142,499
5,403,998
61.26
6,012,809 16,671,941
54.33 49.99
5,907,642
57.28
30425—23 10
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
![Page 143: frb_021923](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061316/55cf97ef550346d033948c9f/html5/thumbnails/143.jpg)
278 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. FEBRUARY, 1923.
NATIONAL BANK OF SWITZERLAND.
[From annual reports and weekly statements of the Bank of Switzerland.]
[In thousands of francs.]
Dec. 31,1913.
Dec. 31,1914.
Dec. 31,1915.
Dec. 30,1916.
Dec. 31,1917.
Dec. 31,1918.
Dec. 31,1919.
Dec. 31,1920.
Dec. 31,1921.
Dec. 30,1922.
Gold in vault-.Silver
169,95620,836
237,93624,913
250,13251,238
344,99852,454
357,64451,830
414,71958,412
453,11473,649
477,743121,571
549,521108,240
535,146103,865
Total metallic vault reserveGold held abroadWar loan bank certificates (Darlehens-
kassascheine)Loans and discountsForeign demand creditsAdvances on securitiesSecuritiesDue from correspondentsBank premisesSundry assets
190,792 262,819 301,370 397,452 409,474 473,131
146,54129,345
196,27117,103
190,0072,484
222,31912,674
360,312
28,3856,377
21,2406,4805,043
19,5529,32933,8266,2506,828
20,9548,099
30,9846,1509,014
22,1406,802
42,9446,6449,284
45.2017,295
32,9216,0089,781
9,765588,81850,06940,8998,553
28,0736,6008,048
526,76363,878
12,010511,60370,28532,6696,63836,1495,4257,721
599,31465,160
13,261474,8833,45636,6305,86434,9755,4279,123
657,761 639,011
18,317378,12315,30075,6965,407
6,74646,916
13,246424,5857,51661,9829,38018,242
27,405
Total. 404,858 564,250 583,681
LIABILITIES.
Capital paid inSurplusNotes in circulation..DepositsSundry liabilities....
25,0001 147
313,82159,0125,878
25,0001,495
455,88970,84211,024
25,0001,995
465,60982,7108,367
710,069
25,0002,441
536,518129,74716,363
883,666
25,0002,941
702,303138,70914,713
1,213,956 1,273,171 1,248,093 1,204,266 1,201,367
25,0007,441
975,706187,64118,168
25,00012,941
1,036,123180,85618,251
25,00014,441
1,023,712163,33421,606
25,0004,941
1,009,264128,76536,296
25,0005,441
976,426165,03229,468
TotalRatio of metallic reserve to deposit and
note liabilities combined—per cent
404,858
51.19
564,250
49.90
533,681
51.96,
710,069
59.66
883,666
48.69
1,213,956
40.67
1,273,171
43.28
1,248,093
50.49
1,204,266
57.80
1,201,367
55.98
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis