fra jurisdiction over commuter railroads and rail transit/freight operations kevin m. sheys, partner...

32
FRA Jurisdiction Over Commuter Railroads and Rail Transit/Freight Operations Kevin M. Sheys, Partner [email protected] K&L Gates, Washington, DC www.klgates.com 2008 South West Transit Association Transit Law Seminar July 20-22, 2008 Santa Fe, NM

Upload: august-perry

Post on 29-Dec-2015

228 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

FRA Jurisdiction Over Commuter Railroads and Rail Transit/Freight Operations

Kevin M. Sheys, [email protected]&L Gates, Washington, DCwww.klgates.com

2008 South West Transit AssociationTransit Law SeminarJuly 20-22, 2008Santa Fe, NM

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Federal Railroad Safety Act Definition:

(1) “railroad” -

(A) means any form of non-highway ground transportation that runs on railsor electromagnetic guide ways, including -

(i) commuter or other short-haul railroad passenger service in a metropolitan or suburban area and commuter railroad service that was operated by the Consolidated Rail Corporation on

January 1, 1979; and

(ii) high speed ground transportation systems that connect metropolitan areas, without regard to whether those systemsuse new technologies not associated with traditional

railroads; but

(B) does not include rapid transit operations in an urban area that are

not connected to the general railroad system of transportation.

49 U.S.C. § 20102 (emphasis added)

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

FRA Jurisdiction

• FRA has jurisdiction over commuter railroads, regardless of connection to the general railroad system

• FRA has jurisdiction over rail transit operations if connected to the general railroad system

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

No FRA Jurisdiction

• FRA does not have jurisdiction over rail transit operations not connected to the general railroad system

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Determining FRA Jurisdiction

Logical Order/ApproachQ : Is it commuter rail?

Y: FRAN: Is it connected to

the GRS?Y: FRAN: Not FRA

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Step 1: Is It Commuter Rail?

• FRA Shared Use Policy (49 C.F.R. Part 209, Appendix A)

• Chicago Transit Authority case• Triangle Transit Authority case

Determining FRA Jurisdiction (cont’d)

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

FRA Shared Use Policy Defines Commuter Rail

• Serves urban area, suburbs and more distant outlying communities in the greater metropolitan area

• Q: Average trip length?• Q: Average distance between stations?

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

FRA Shared Use Policy Defines Commuter Rail (cont’d)

• Primary function is moving passengers back and forth between work and homes within the greater metropolitan area

• Q: What percentage of trips are work and school trips?

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

FRA Shared Use Policy Defines Commuter Rail (cont’d)

• Vast bulk of trains operated in morning/evening peak periods

• A few trains at other hours• Q: Percentage of trains in

Rush Hour Periods?

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

FRA Shared Use Policy Defines Commuter Rail (cont’d)

Most critical Factor?• Absence or presence of riders

with trip purpose other than commuter or school

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

FRA Shared Use Policy Defines Urban Rapid Transit

• Serves an urban area (and may also serve its suburbs)

• Q: What is the average trip length?• Q: What is the average distance

between stations?

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

FRA Shared Use Policy Defines Urban Rapid Transit (cont’d)

• Major function is station to station service with multiple station stops within the urban area

• Q: Various trip purposes, besides work and school trips

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

FRA Shared Use Policy Defines Urban Rapid Transit (cont’d)

• Frequent train service even outside morning/evening peak periods

• Q: What percentage of train starts are in Rush Hour Periods?

• Q: How much weekend service?

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Determining FRA Jurisdiction

Step 2: Is it connected to the GRS?

What is a “connection”? FRA shared use policy says must look at nature of connection

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Determining FRA Jurisdiction (cont’d)

Connection?FRA will construe the word to mean “operating of, or over the lines of, the general system.”

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Easy Cases Connection –

Shared Track, including freight and passenger window (“Temporal Separation”)

No Connection Freight track used for delivery of goods or equipment to transit facility

Determining FRA Jurisdiction (cont’d)

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Closer Cases Shared grade crossings Shared right-of-way (separate track)

Commonly dispatched facilities

Determining FRA Jurisdiction (cont’d)

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Determining FRA Jurisdiction (cont’d)

Modified Order/ApproachQ : Is it commuter rail?

Y: FRAN: Does it use track on the GRS?

Y: FRA N: Does it have a common facility?

Y: FRA on facilityN: Does it have grade crossings?

Y : FRA at grade crossings

N : No FRA

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Commuter Rail or Connected Rail-Why do I care about the

difference?

Available waivers – very limited on commuter rail

If Connected Rail – FRA will regulate only to the extent of the connection

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority

(CMTA)

• Sought waiver in May, 2006• Based in part on temporal separation

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Compare Earlier Series of Waivers to CMTA Waiver

• Overall, FRA granted most of the waiver requests in prior series of waivers

• CMTA, FRA denied a signification number of waiver requests

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Compare Utah Transit Authority TRAX Waiver to CMTA Waiver

• Worker/Operations WaiversFRA Regulation: CMTA UTA TRAX Waiver

Part 219 Control of Alcohol and Drug Use Denied Granted

Part 225 Accident and Incident Reporting Denied Granted – Injury ReportingDenied – Accident Reporting

Part 239 Passenger Train Emergency Preparedness Denied Granted

Part 240 Qualification and Certification of Locomotive Engineers Denied Granted

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Compare UTA TRAX Waiver to CMTA Waiver (cont’d)

• Rolling Stock/Vehicle WaiversFRA Regulation: CMTA UTA TRAX Waiver

Part 221 Rear End Marking Devices Pending – data request Granted

Part 223 Safety Glazing Standards Granted – conditions Granted

Part 229 Locomotive Safety StandardsLocomotive Identification

Granted N/A

Aluminum main reservoirs Denied – refile N/A

Clearance above top of rail Pending – data request Granted

Headlights and auxiliary lights Denied – refile Granted

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Compare UTA TRAX Waiver to CMTA Waiver (cont’d)

• Rolling Stock/Vehicle Waivers (cont’d)FRA Regulation: CMTA UTA TRAX Waiver

Part 231 Safety Appliance Standards Denied – may not be needed Granted

Part 238 Passenger Equipment Safety StandardsFire Safety Denied – refile N/A

Train electronic hardware and software safety Denied – may not be needed N/A

Emergency window exit Granted – data request Granted

Static end strength Granted – data request Granted

Anti-climbing mechanism Granted – data request Granted

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Compare UTA TRAX Waiver to CMTA Waiver (cont’d)

• Rolling Stock/Vehicle Waivers (cont’d)FRA Regulation: CMTA UTA TRAX Waiver

Part 238 Passenger Equipment Safety Standards (cont’d)Link between coupling mechanism and car body Pending – data request Granted

Forward-facing end structure, collision & corner posts Granted Granted

Rollover strength/side structure Granted Granted

Truck to car body attachment Granted, except on truck under center unit

N/A

Locomotive fuel tanks Denied on main fuel tank

N/A

Interior fittings Granted – conditions Granted

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Explanation• FRA regulates commuter rails in shared

track environments differently than it regulates transit in shared track environments

• Especially on worker/operations issues• FRA has jurisdiction over both, but

exercises it differently

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Approach/Analysis

• Know whether your project is commuter rail or rail transit

• If it is commuter rail, be aware of the compliance issues and the very limited availability of waivers

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Approach/Analysis (cont’d)

• If it is rail transit, know whether it is connected to the general railroad system

• If it is connected, be aware of the scope of waivers available depending on the nature of the connection and the operating environment

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Approach/Analysis (cont’d)

• If it is rail transit, make sure your entire management team knows the implications of establishing a connection

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

Approach/Analysis (cont’d)

• Unless absolutely clear, analyze your facts under the FRA Shared Use Policy and Case Law

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

References

• 49 U.S.C. § 20102• 49 CFR Part 209, Appendix A and Part 211, Appendix A• FRA Shared Use Policy, 65 Fed. Reg. 42529• Utah Transit Authority TRAX Waiver filing and decision –

http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocketDetailEd=FRA-1999-6253

• Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority waiver filing and decision - http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocketDetailEd=FRA-2006-25040

K&L GATES www.klgates.com

References (cont’d)

• Chicago Transit Authority v. Flohr, 570 F.2d 1305 (7th Cir. 1977).• Triangle Transit Authority,

http://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/counsel/tritrans.pdf; http://www.klgates.com/files/Publication/496a09c6-4551-433f-9406-eec8587f478b/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/6a4a9bf0-e56d-405f-974c-8429fb0ac994/KL%20Transportation%20Alert%20-%20FRA%20Asserts%20Jurisdiction%20-%20February%202003.pdf