flow of a cement slurry modeled as a generalized second ......research & innovation center science &...

1
Research & Innovation Center Science & Engineering To Power Our Future Flow of a Cement Slurry Modeled as a Generalized Second Grade Fluid Chengcheng Tao 1 , Eilis Rosenbaum 1 , Barbara Kutchko 1 , Mehrdad Massoudi 1 1 US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA, 15236 MOTIVATION & OBJECTIVES CONCLUSIONS MATHEMATICAL MODEL Motivation Well cementing is the process of placing a cement slurry in the annulus space between the well casing and the surrounding for zonal isolation Rheological behavior of oil well cement slurries is significant in well cementing operation Objectives Study the impact of constitutive parameters on behavior of cement slurry Perform parametric study for various dimensionless numbers The parametric study indicates that maximum packing , concentration flux parameters , the angle of inclination , pulsating pressure and gravity terms affect the velocity and particle distribution significantly. This study is simply a preliminary case and further studies will be performed where the effects of diffusion, heat transfer, such as viscous dissipation and yield stresses will be considered. In this paper, we assume that the cement slurry behaves as a non-Newtonian fluid. We use a constitutive relation for the viscous stress tensor which is based on a modified form of the second grade (Rivlin-Ericksen) fluid [2]. Steady motion and unsteady motion are analyzed with one-dimensional flow. Geometry of the problem = () = = −1 = 0; =1 = 0; −1 1 = Schematic diagram Conservation of mass + =0 : density of cement slurry, which is related to (density of pure fluid); : velocity vector; = (1 − ) ; : volume fraction Conservation of linear momentum = + / : total time derivative, given by . = (.) + . : stress tensor; : body force vector Conservation of angular momentum = Stress tensor of fluid [3]: = − + , + 1 + 2 2 : pressure; 1 , 2 are the normal stress coefficients; is the effective viscosity, which is dependent on volume fraction and shear rate [4]: , = 0 1− ϕ ϕ 1 + tr 2 : maximum solid concentration packing; : n-th order Rivlin-Ericksen tensors, where = + ; = + + Convection-diffusion equation + = −div Particle flux [5]: particles collisions; spatially varying viscosity; Brownian diffusive flux = − 2 ϕ ϕ 2 2 where, = 2 0 1 + 2 (1 − ) 2 + 3 2 ( − ) 2 [6] RESULTS References [1] Piot, B. (2009). Cement and Cementing: An Old Technique With a Future?. SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX. [2] Massoudi, M., & Tran, P. X. (2016). The Couette–Poiseuille flow of a suspension modeled as a modified third-grade fluid. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 86(5), 921-932. [3] Tao C., Kutchko, B., Rosenbaum E.; Wu WT., & Massoudi M. (2019), Steady flow of a cement slurry, submitted. [4] Krieger, Irvin M., and Thomas J. Dougherty. 1959. “A Mechanism for Non‐Newtonian Flow in Suspensions of Rigid Spheres.” Transactions of the Society of Rheology 3 (1): 137–52. [5] Phillips RJ, Armstrong RC, Brown RA, Graham AL, Abbott JR. A constitutive equation for concentrated suspensions that accounts for shear‐induced particle migration. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics. 1992; 4(1): 30–40. [6] Garboczi EJ, Bentz DP. Computer simulation of the diffusivity of cement-based materials. Journal of materials science. 1992; 27(8): 2083–92. [7] Bridges, C., & Rajagopal, K. R. (2006). Pulsatile flow of a chemically-reacting nonlinear fluid. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 52(6-7), 1131-1144. Piot, B. (2009) [1] Steady flow Unsteady flow = (, ) = , Steady flow with constant pressure Effect of inclination angle Effect of Unsteady flow with pulsating pressure Surface Formation Formation Cement Slurry Gravity = 1, = 0; ϕ = 1, = 0; = 0, = 0; ϕ = 0, =0 Parametric study with designated value of dimensionless numbers Dimensionless # Value ϕ 0.45, 0.5, 0.55, 0.6, 0.65 / 0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08 0 o , 30 o , 45 o , 60 o , 90 o -0.5, 0, 0.5, 1 R 0 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 R 1 0, -1.5, -2.5, -3.5 R 2 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 R 3 0.01, 0.1, 1 R 4 0.01, 0.1, 1 R 5 0.01, 0.1, 1 Effect of =− 0 + 0 sin Effect of pressure R 1

Upload: others

Post on 03-Feb-2021

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Research & Innovation Center

    Science & Engineering To Power Our Future

    Flow of a Cement Slurry Modeled as a Generalized Second Grade FluidChengcheng Tao1, Eilis Rosenbaum1, Barbara Kutchko1, Mehrdad Massoudi11US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA, 15236

    MOTIVATION & OBJECTIVES

    CONCLUSIONS

    MATHEMATICAL MODEL

    Motivation

    • Well cementing is the process of placing a cement slurry in the annulus space between the well

    casing and the surrounding for zonal isolation

    • Rheological behavior of oil well cement slurries is significant in well cementing operation

    Objectives

    • Study the impact of constitutive parameters on behavior of cement slurry

    • Perform parametric study for various dimensionless numbers

    • The parametric study indicates that maximum packing 𝜙𝑚, concentration flux

    parameters𝐾𝑐

    𝐾𝜇, the angle of inclination 𝜃, pulsating pressure and gravity terms

    affect the velocity and particle distribution significantly.

    • This study is simply a preliminary case and further studies will be performedwhere the effects of diffusion, heat transfer, such as viscous dissipation and yieldstresses will be considered.

    • In this paper, we assume that the cement slurry behaves as a non-Newtonian fluid.

    • We use a constitutive relation for the viscous stress tensor which is based on a modified form

    of the second grade (Rivlin-Ericksen) fluid [2].

    • Steady motion and unsteady motion are analyzed with one-dimensional flow.

    Geometry of the problem

    𝜙 = 𝜙(𝑦)

    𝒗 = 𝑣 𝑦 𝒆𝒙

    𝑣 𝑦 = −1 = 0; 𝑣 𝑦 = 1 = 0; −1

    1

    𝜙𝑑 𝑦 = 𝜙𝑎𝑣𝑔

    Schematic diagram

    Conservation of mass𝜕𝜌

    𝜕𝑡+ 𝑑𝑖𝑣 𝜌𝒗 = 0

    𝜌: density of cement slurry, which is related to 𝜌𝑓 (density of pure fluid);

    𝒗: velocity vector; 𝜌 = (1 − 𝜙) 𝜌𝑓; 𝜙: volume fraction

    Conservation of linear momentum

    𝜌𝑑𝒗

    𝑑𝑡= 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑻 + 𝜌𝒃

    𝑑/𝑑𝑡: total time derivative, given by 𝑑 .

    𝑑𝑡=

    𝜕(.)

    𝜕𝑡+ 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑 . 𝒗

    𝑻: stress tensor; 𝒃: body force vector

    Conservation of angular momentum

    𝑻 = 𝑻𝑻

    Stress tensor of fluid [3]:

    𝑻𝑣 = −𝑝𝑰 + 𝜇𝑒𝑓𝑓 𝜙,𝑨𝟏 𝑨𝟏 + 𝛼1𝑨𝟐 + 𝛼2𝑨𝟏2

    𝑝: pressure; 𝛼1, 𝛼2 are the normal stress coefficients; 𝜇𝑒𝑓𝑓 is the effective viscosity, which is

    dependent on volume fraction and shear rate [4]:

    𝜇𝑒𝑓𝑓 𝜙, 𝑨𝟏 = 𝜇0 1 −ϕ

    ϕ𝑚

    −𝛽

    1 + 𝛼tr𝑨𝟏2 𝑚

    𝜙𝑚: maximum solid concentration packing;𝑨𝒏: n-th order Rivlin-Ericksen tensors,

    where 𝑨𝟏 = 𝛻𝒗 + 𝛻𝒗𝑇; 𝑨𝟐 =

    𝑑𝑨𝟏

    𝑑𝑡+ 𝑨𝟏𝛻𝒗 + 𝛻𝒗

    𝑇𝑨𝟏

    Convection-diffusion equation𝜕𝜙

    𝜕𝑡+ 𝑑𝑖𝑣 𝜙𝒗 = −div𝑵

    Particle flux [5]: particles collisions; spatially varying viscosity; Brownian diffusive flux

    𝑵 = −𝑎2ϕ𝐾𝑐𝛻 𝛾ϕ − 𝑎2𝜙2 𝛾𝐾𝜇𝛻 𝑙𝑛𝜇𝑒𝑓𝑓 − 𝐷𝛻𝜙

    where, 𝐷𝛻𝜙 = 𝜂 𝑨𝟏2 ∙ 𝐷0 𝐾1 + 𝐾2(1 − 𝜙)

    2+𝐾3 𝜙𝑚 − 𝜙2𝐻(𝜙𝑚 − 𝜙)

    2𝛻𝜙 [6]

    RESULTS

    References

    [1] Piot, B. (2009). Cement and Cementing: An Old Technique With a Future?. SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.[2] Massoudi, M., & Tran, P. X. (2016). The Couette–Poiseuille flow of a suspension modeled as a modified third-grade fluid. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 86(5), 921-932.[3] Tao C., Kutchko, B., Rosenbaum E.; Wu WT., & Massoudi M. (2019), Steady flow of a cement slurry, submitted.[4] Krieger, Irvin M., and Thomas J. Dougherty. 1959. “A Mechanism for Non‐Newtonian Flow in Suspensions of Rigid Spheres.” Transactions of the Society of Rheology 3 (1): 137–52.[5] Phillips RJ, Armstrong RC, Brown RA, Graham AL, Abbott JR. A constitutive equation for concentrated suspensions that accounts for shear‐induced particle migration. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics. 1992; 4(1): 30–40. [6] Garboczi EJ, Bentz DP. Computer simulation of the diffusivity of cement-based materials. Journal of materials science. 1992; 27(8): 2083–92. [7] Bridges, C., & Rajagopal, K. R. (2006). Pulsatile flow of a chemically-reacting nonlinear fluid. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 52(6-7), 1131-1144.

    Piot, B. (2009) [1]

    Steady flow

    Unsteady flow

    𝜙 = 𝜙(𝑟, 𝑡)

    𝒗 = 𝑣 𝑟, 𝑡 𝒆𝒛

    Steady flow with constant pressure

    Effect of inclination angle 𝜃

    Effect of 𝜙𝑚

    Unsteady flow with pulsating pressure

    Surface

    Formation

    Formation

    Cement Slurry

    Gravity

    𝜃

    𝑣 𝑟 = 1, 𝑡 = 0;𝜕ϕ

    𝜕 𝑟 𝑟 = 1, 𝑡 = 0;

    𝜕 𝑣

    𝜕 𝑟 𝑟 = 0, 𝑡 = 0;

    𝜕ϕ

    𝜕 𝑟 𝑟 = 0, 𝑡 = 0

    Parametric study with designated value of dimensionless numbers

    Dimensionless # Value

    ϕ𝑚 0.45, 0.5, 0.55, 0.6, 0.65

    𝐾𝑐/𝐾𝜇 0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08

    𝜃 0o, 30o, 45o, 60o, 90o

    𝑚 -0.5, 0, 0.5, 1

    R0 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10

    R1 0, -1.5, -2.5, -3.5

    R2 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5

    R3 0.01, 0.1, 1

    R4 0.01, 0.1, 1

    R5 0.01, 0.1, 1

    Effect of 𝐾𝑐

    𝐾𝜇

    𝜕𝑝

    𝜕𝑧= − 𝐴0 + 𝐵0 sin𝜔𝑡

    Effect of pressure R1