first pod results on sentinel-6a - doris

19
First POD Results on Sentinel-6A Alexandre Couhert 1,* , Sabine Houry 1 , Flavien Mercier 1 , John Moyard 1 1 Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales, Toulouse, France * Mail : [email protected] IDS Analysis Working Group Virtual Meeting April 7, 2021 0

Upload: others

Post on 13-Nov-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

First POD Results on Sentinel-6A

Alexandre Couhert1,*, Sabine Houry1, Flavien Mercier1, John Moyard1

1 Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales, Toulouse, France

∗Mail : [email protected]

IDS Analysis Working GroupVirtual Meeting

April 7, 2021

0

Page 2: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

INTRODUCTION

1. STC/NTC Configuration2. First Comparisons to Orbits from

ESOC3. Clocks Analysis4. SLR Calibration & Validation

1

Page 3: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

INTRODUCTION

1. STC/NTC Configuration2. First Comparisons to Orbits from

ESOC3. Clocks Analysis4. SLR Calibration & Validation

2

Page 4: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

1. STC/NTC CONFIGURATION

v Operational processingâ POE-F dynamic and measurements standards (e.g., same as Sentinel-3A/B and Jason-3).◦ Nominal attitude (negligible impact of measured quaternions).◦ Updated Solar Radiation Pressure macromodel (IDS box-wing) with respect to ESA/ESTEC

Sentinel-6 POD Context.

FIGURE : Daily CR estimates from ESOC.

3

Page 5: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

1. STC/NTC CONFIGURATION

v Operational processingâ STC/NTC DORIS+GPS reduced-dynamic orbits (Galileo not used in the operational orbits).◦ No fixing of GPS ambiguities (not yet possible with the operational RINEX files).◦ Adjusted GPS PCO in all three directions (no PCV map).◦ Updated DORIS PCO : +10 mm in Y and +32 mm in Z directions (w/o solving for station heights).⇒ Similar SRP mismodeling signature observed in Y (common X and Z signals to be explained).

10−day estimates of Galileo PCO

Days w.r.t. 2021.0

Corrections (mm)

−40 −20 0 20 40 60 80

−40

−30

−20

−10

0

10

20

30

X

Y

Z

10−day estimates of DORIS PCO

Days w.r.t. 2021.0

Corrections (mm)

−40 −20 0 20 40 60 80

−30

−25

−20

−15

−10

−5

0

5

10

15

Y

Z

FIGURE : Daily estimated Galileo (left) and 10-day estimates of DORIS (right) PCO.

4

Page 6: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

INTRODUCTION

1. STC/NTC Configuration2. First Comparisons to Orbits from

ESOC3. Clocks Analysis4. SLR Calibration & Validation

5

Page 7: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

2. FIRST COMPARISONS TO ORBITS FROM ESOCv Comparisons to independent GPS+Galileo solutions from ESOC (Cycle 001)

FIGURE : CY001 CNES POE-F DORIS+GPS - ESOC GPS+Galileo.6

Page 8: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

2. FIRST COMPARISONS TO ORBITS FROM ESOCv Comparisons to independent GPS+Galileo solutions from ESOC (Cycle 002)

FIGURE : CY002 CNES POE-F DORIS+GPS - ESOC GPS+Galileo.7

Page 9: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

2. FIRST COMPARISONS TO ORBITS FROM ESOC

v SLR validations (Cycles 001-002)â *8-station Core-Network (CN) : Yarragadee, Graz, Greenbelt, Matera, Maui, Herstmonceux,

Hartebeesthoek, Zimmerwald.â **RMS of SLR CN residuals above 70 degree elevation.

FIGURE : SLR residuals RMS for CNES POE-F DORIS+GPS and ESOC GPS/Galileo.

8

Page 10: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

INTRODUCTION

1. STC/NTC Configuration2. First Comparisons to Orbits from

ESOC3. Clocks Analysis4. SLR Calibration & Validation

9

Page 11: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

3. CLOCKS ANALYSIS

v Contextâ Analysis of the Sentinel-3A, Sentinel-3B and Sentinel-6A clock behavior :◦ for the SAA effect (clock and/or frequency),◦ for the altimeter processing (Sentinel-6A case, comparison with DORIS frequency estimations).

10

Page 12: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

3. CLOCKS ANALYSIS

v Sentinel-3A

FIGURE : Sentinel-3A’s clock as seen by GPS.

11

Page 13: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

3. CLOCKS ANALYSIS

v Sentinel-3B

FIGURE : Sentinel-3B’s clock as seen by GPS.

12

Page 14: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

3. CLOCKS ANALYSIS

v Sentinel-6A

FIGURE : Sentinel-6A’s clock as seen by GPS.

13

Page 15: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

3. CLOCKS ANALYSIS

v Sentinel-6A

FIGURE : Sentinel-6A’s USO frequency as seen by DORIS and GPS.

14

Page 16: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

INTRODUCTION

1. STC/NTC Configuration2. First Comparisons to Orbits from

ESOC3. Clocks Analysis4. SLR Calibration & Validation

15

Page 17: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

4. SLR CALIBRATION & VALIDATION

v ILRS SLR mission supportâ 15 SLR stations interleaved since the beginning of the Sentinel-6a/Jason-3 tandem phase.◦ Frank Lemoine (NASA/GSFC) sent a message to the ILRS stations on March 02, 2021 reminding

them of the need to interleave tracks and to otherwise alternate whole tracks, pass-by-pass.

FIGURE : Yarragadee SLR station interleaving beween Jason-3 and Sentinel-6a.16

Page 18: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

4. SLR CALIBRATION & VALIDATION

v Hemispherical orbit/altimeter bias between Sentinel-6a and Jason-3 ?â High-elevation interleaving SLR residuals could help identifying the origin of this bias.

FIGURE : Residual difference of SSH between Jason-3 and Sentinel-6a.17

Page 19: First POD Results on Sentinel-6A - DORIS

4. SLR CALIBRATION & VALIDATION

v SLR (at orbit level) versus tide gauges (at sea level)â Only 7 stations interleave at high elevations.â Yarragadee only has enough passes above 70◦ elevation angle ⇒ no clear systematic

differences between Jason-3 and Sentinel-6a CNES POE-F orbits.

−20 −10 0 10 20 30 40 50

−1.0

−0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

SLR station 7090 interleaving passes above 70° elevation angle

Days w.r.t. 2021.0

Resid

uals

(cm

)

Jason−3

Sentinel−6a

70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84

−1.0

−0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

SLR station 7090 interleaving passes above 70° elevation angle

Elevation angle (degree)

Resid

uals

(cm

)

Jason−3

Sentinel−6a

FIGURE : Yarragadee SLR station interleaving passes above 70◦ elevation angle.

18