first draft of the gauteng provincial consultative ...sti4shs.co.za/sites/default/files/2/2.1...

First draft of the Gauteng Provincial Consultative

Workshop Report, distributed to workshop attendees for review

and input. Kindly provide feedback by 31 December 2018

to [email protected]

Distributed by Peta de Jager 31 October 2018.

PROVINCIAL CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOP REPORTScience Technology & Innovation for

Sustainable Human Settlements Roadmap

Contents

1. Common purpose & Contents

2. Introduction

3. Overview

4. Setting the scene: Risk

trajectories of South African

settlements

1. Background

2. Rationale for the Green Book

3. South Africa’s urban future

4. GP population estimates 2050

5. GP vulnerabilities

6. 2050 projected changes in climate

7. Implications for Gauteng

5. Workshop inputs

1. Many interventions and needs

2. Priority interventions

3. Objectives and time-frames

4. Barriers and enablers

5. Workshop feedback

6. Preliminary analysis

7. Way forward

1. Various inputs consolidated

2. Opportunities to be appraised

3. Draft Roadmap

8. Acknowledgements

9. References

Appendix A – Roadmap definition process

Appendix B - Stakeholder engagement strategy at

a glance

Common purpose

The purpose of the STI 4 SHSRoadmap is to unlock the potentialof South Africa’s human settlementsfor a decent standard of living; safe,resilient and sustainable householdsand neighbourhoods via the smartuptake of science, technology andinnovation.

IntroductionThe Science, Technology and Innovation for Sustainable Human Settlements Technology Roadmap (STI 4 SHS Roadmap) will set out a 10 year plan for a coordinated investment and collaboration between key stakeholders in pursuit of the Common Purpose. The STI 4 SHS Roadmap definition is to be underpinned by intensive engagement, and extensive research (referenced and available for further scrutiny at www.sti4shs.co.za ).

In order to engage relevant stakeholders, a number of distinct stakeholder groups were identified, viz. government and civil society, academia, private sector & industry and the investment community. In the first round each stakeholder group is to be engaged separately. This report records inputs from the first Gauteng Province

(GP) consultative workshop, which formed part of a systematic provincial consultative workshop series targeting government thought leaders, from national, provincial and local government.

The purpose of the workshops was to reflect on the current state of technology in human settlements, envision a future preferred state, and identify the technologies, innovations and capabilities and the necessary “ingredients” to reach that state over time.

Twenty-two participants from the following organisations are acknowledged for their active participation in the GP workshop:

City of Tshwane

CSIR

Department of Science and

Technology

Gauteng Departments of Human

Settlements

i@ consulting

National Department of Human

Settlements

National Department of Water and

Sanitation

NHBRC

SALGA

Technology Innovation Agency

University of Pretoria

Water Research Commission

http://www.sti4shs.co.za/

The Green Book

Risk trajectories of South African

settlements

Gauteng initial findings

4 September 2018

OverviewRoadmapping

Roadmapping uses a graphical approach to visualise an entire strategy on a page. It provides a framework to help organisations tackle fundamental questions applicable in any strategic context and is used extensively at company, sector and national levels to align investment and research with strategic goals.

Significant features of roadmappingare its ability to build consensus, breadth and versatility: roadmaps can encompass a complex scope of issues and long timeframes, whilst at the same time focusing down on critical details, leading to decisions and actions.

Workshop preliminariesCSIR hosted the GP Provincial Consultative Workshop on the 4th of September 2018 in Pretoria. The STI 4 SHS Draft Desktop Review Trends Report was electronically provided to participants before the meeting, and an excerpt on Mega-challenges and Trends presented (available at www.sti.shs.co.za).

The workshop participants were then presented a province-specific extract from the forthcoming Green Book focussing on Risk trajectories of South African settlements. This input is incorporated into this report and will heavily inform the validation phase of roadmap development.

6

Background

Strong evidence that extreme weather events are becoming more frequent and intense with climate change expected to amplify these trends, particularly heat waves, floods, droughts, wildfires and storm surges

Strong evidence to support that Urbanisation will continue & that this will place even more pressure on infrastructure and service delivery

More frequent and intense events combined with a growing and urbanising population, poor land use practices, growing informal sector = likely exacerbate the vulnerabilities of communities and place more people at risk of climate induced disasters

Growth can be a catalyst for economic growth but effective planning and policy interventions are needed

Spatial planning will be vital to planning for peoples sustainable livelihoods

7

Rationale for the Green Book

Knowing what change to adapt for and how to adapt for this

change is of critical importance to decision makers involved in the planning and design of human

settlements.

The Green Book was commissioned with the aim of supporting municipal planning on the development of climate-resilient cities and

settlements through research in climate adaptation.

8

South Africa’s urban future

SA is expected to follow the worldwide trend - experiencing high population growth and urbanisation. Current projections indicate and additional 19-24 million people to be added to the country in the next three decades. Vast majority of growth to be confined to cities and towns

9

Gauteng’s population estimates 2050

Gauteng’s population is projected to reach 20 – 22 million people by 2050

10

Gauteng’s population estimates

11

Gauteng’s LM vulnerabilities

Socio-economic: Households vulnerabilities (household composition, income composition, education, health, access to basic services, safety & security)

Economic vulnerability: Economy of the LM (diversification, size of economy, labour force, GDP growth/decline pressure, inequality)

Physical vulnerability: Access & infrastructure (road infrastructure, housing types, density, accessibility within the LM)

Environmental vulnerability: Air quality, environmental governance, competition between ecology & urban encroachment)

12

Gauteng’s Local Municipalities vulnerabilities1. High % of population have low literacy level

2. High % of households live under minimum

living level

1. High % of households live under minimum

living level2. High child

mortality rate

1. High Inequality2. Low GDP per

Capita

1. Low GDP growth 2. Low GDP

production & Low GDP per Capita

1. High % of informal housing

2. High % of government

subsidised housing

1. High % of informal housing

2. High % of government

subsidised housing

1. Water Resources (Groundwater, Surface

Water, Wetlands)2. Environmental Health

(Low Air Quality)

1. Environmental Health (Low Air Quality)

2. Human influence (Urban encroachment, Eroded/Degraded area)

13

2050 Projected changes in climate

Low mitigation (RCP 8.5)

Temp: 2.5C – 3.5C increase in both min and max temp

Very Hot Days

• More vhd projected for the north (up to 40-50 vhd

more)

• South (up to 20 vhd more)

Extreme Rainfall Events

• Mixed signal for north

• Clear signal of increases in extreme rainfall events

for southern Gauteng (up to 3 more)

High mitigation (RCP 4.5)

Temp: 2C – 3C increase in both min and max temp

Very Hot Days

• More vhd projected for the north (up to 30-40 vhd

more)

• South (up to 15 vhd more)

Extreme Rainfall Events

• Decrease in far North (up to 2 days less)

• Mixed signal for central Gauteng

• Clear signal of increases in extreme rainfall events

for southern Gauteng (up to 3 more)

2050Projected changes in

climate

14

Changes in heat stress

Increase no. Very Hot DaysLow Mitigation Scenario

15

Urban flooding

The mean ratio of the near-future (2021-2050) and current

(1961-1990) extreme daily rainfall (95th percentiles) for

each quinary catchment.

16

Changes in drought

Drought Index (SPI)

17

Implications for GP

The significant population growth projected, if not managed and planned for effectively, will place an enormous amount of pressure on bulk infrastructure delivery and will have critical implications for national and regional policies and inter-governmental prioritisation efforts

This growth however also opens up the possibilities of designing principles of resilience into our cities, principles that can open up pathways to change

Increase in severe events will result in flash flooding, hail, damaging winds and lightning impacting infrastructure and housing

Heat stress on ecology Heat stress on human comfort– specifically elderly, lower income and youth The population growth and warmer climate projections will have significant relevance for

energy demand (increase demand for cooling in summer due to maximum temperature increase, decrease warming demand given increase in minimum temp)

Workshop inputsWorkshop format

Following expert presentations on trends and drivers, the workshop format was described (right). The objectives of the workshop were introduced, as follows:

Identify the needs, drivers, and trends

Set time-frames

Inform the objectives

Identify the priority interventions.

Workshop participants were invited to individually write down three scientific, technological or innovative intervention -not yet mainstream - which will best improve the quality of life in human settlements in Gauteng. These Many interventions and needs are tabulated below.

What external trends and drivers and stakeholder needs will influence the development of technology/ies of interest?

Why is this needed?

What is the desired future state (vision)?

What innovations, technologies, and capabilitiies are required to deliver the desired vision?

How?

What enablers e.g. skills, resources, infrastructure and policy instruments are needed?

Ingredients?

Many interventions & needs

Themes and priority interventions

“Ingredients”ObjectivesTime frames

Mega-challenges and trends in human settlementsRisk trajectories

Barriers and enablers

Sticky

notes

Visualising chart

Workshop format

GP 10021 More choice in housing design and construction c Employment

GP 10015 Virtual reality classrooms e Knowledge management

GP 10016 App development to educate learners e Knowledge management

GP 10026 IT-enabled working from home e Resource optimisation

GP 10007 Improved roofing to withstand flash-flooding in rural areas r Risk reduction (climate change)

GP 10009 Use of drones for improved surveillance q Safety and security

GP 10009 Design towns and cities to be more safe i Safety and security

GP 10008 Waste reuse, collection, waste to energy i Resource optimisation

GP 10005 Adaptive settlements for flooding r Risk reduction (climate change)

GP 10017 Microgrids r Energy security

GP 10017 Very efficient cooking devices r Energy security

GP 10029 Green building for reduced greenhouse gas emission r Risk reduction (climate change)

GP 10012 Renewable energy r Risk reduction (climate change)

GP 10012 Waste to energy r Risk reduction (climate change)

GP 10008 Alternative sources a Energy costs

GP 10024 Smart building methods a Energy costs

GP 10024 Passive design architecture a Energy costs

GP 10024 Limit of power-use systems, metered e Energy costs

GP 10009 Renewable energy - solar, small-scale hydropower r Energy availability

GP 10021 Small-scale food production r Food security

GP 10026 Household food gardens r Food security

GP 10013 Allocation of land for urban agriculture r Food security

GP 10020 Urban farming for sustainable livelihoods and CO2 emissions r Food security

GP 10015 Urban greening and food production r Food security

Many interventions and needs

GP 10007 Access to aircon for the poor q Climate change

GP 10006 Selection of construction materials and design of housing or neighbourhoodq Climate change

GP 10011 Building technologies to go up to 2nd and 3rd storeys to densify e Urban sprawl

GP 10026 Formalisation and demonstration through high rise buildings. Resettling in integrated human settlement projects which have used new building technologiese Informal settlements

GP 10018 Different materials like woods and boards are very cheap and easy to assembleq Inability to use new building technologies

GP 10011 Upgrade settlements q Fire and social inequality

GP 10029 Building materials r Risk reduction (fire and heat)

GP 10005 Build adaptive settlements r Risk reduction (climate change)

GP 10006 Production of building materials using raw materials i Infrastructure development

GP 10020 Innovative building design r Risk reduction (climate change)

GP 10008 Innovative building technologies a Escalating building costs

GP 10012 Green building at city and building levels r Resource optimisation

GP 10017 Compact, modular apartments a Cost of housing

GP 10011 Appropriate settlements and housing designs implemented i Risk reduction (climate change)

GP 10016 Water technology to generate electricity i Lack of energy supply

GP 10015 Water scarcity r Risk reduction (climate change)

GP 10030 Stormwater modelling r Risk reduction (climate change)

GP 10013 Duel pipe (reuse) systems e Water efficiency

GP 10016 Smart-metering e Water efficiency

GP 10021 Passive waste water treatment with resource recovery e Water and energy efficiency

GP 10009 Low pour flush sanitation e Water efficiency

GP 10009 Point of use water treatment/ filtration e Water efficiency and quality

GP 10009 Waterless sanitation e Water efficiency

GP 10022 Informal settlement waste bundling and capture q Informal settlement waste

GP 10018 Maintenance of water infrastructure e Water efficiency

GP 10026 Chemical toilets to reduce dependance on water r Water efficiency

GP 10024 Waterless toilets e Water efficiency

GP 10024 Efficient water tanks e Water efficiency

GP 10024 Metered systems with rationing e Water efficiency

GP 10023 Urban settlements planning tools i Integrated planning

GP 10013 Macro-spatial planning, protection of resources i Integrated planning

GP 10013 Monitoring water loss e Water efficiency

GP 10017 Municipal by-law i Uptake of innovation

GP 10013 Influencing municipal policy and by-laws i Uptake of innovation

GP 10013 More stringent enforcement aided by IT, effluent quality, water leaks, building housingi Resource optimisation

GP 10022 Mixed zoning with non-hazardous industries i Resource optimisation (land use)

GP 10002 Climate sensitive planning and settlements i Risk reduction (climate change)

GP 10013 Compact cities and higher densities e Urban sprawl

GP 10013 Higher density housing, new management models aided by IT (e.g. access control)e Urban sprawl

GP 10021 Settlement with integrated livelihoods e Urban sprawl

GP 10020 Urban high rises e Resource optimisation (land use)

GP 10011 Rapid servicing of land with resource-efficient systems s Rapid urbanisation

GP 10024 Clustered and well-resourced human settlements e Rapid urbanisation

GP 10024 Increased public transport s Rapid urbanisation

GP 10013 Multi-nodal transport, compact, densify e Urban sprawl

GP 10029 Transit oriented development a Mobility

GP 10022 More use of public transport a Rapid urbanisation

GP 10022 Transport policy review - location e Rapid urbanisation

GP 10017 Cycle paths c Mobility

GP 10029 Cargo cycles (electric/ human powered) c Goods transport/ logistics

GP 10026 Reduce transport CO2 emissions r Risk reduction (climate change)

GP 10006 Improved data of innovative materials i Knowledge management

GP 10006 Use demo sites to gather data on performance of innovative materials and technologiesi Knowledge management

GP 10006 Use of innovative materials in construction i Slow pace of delivery

GP 10018 Ceilings in houses to absorb heat q Risk reduction (climate change)

GP 10002 Disruptive technologies i Resource optimisation

GP 10002 New cohort of skills and capacities i Knowledge management

Priority InterventionsThe Many interventions and needs, were discussed in groups. The interventions were sorted thematically into a template prepared in advance. The template reflected the taxonomy describing human settlements developed in advance in consultation with project partners and shown in the figure below.

In randomised groups, participants then identified prioritised the themes of shelter and construction; governance; land; and transport and mobility by casting votes. ± Three Priority interventions were then identified for each priority theme as listed below:

Water and sanitation

Mainstreaming alternative sanitation technology

Smart management of water - Water efficiency management systems and tools, including smart- metering

Provincial water roadmaps

Shelter and construction

Policy for green building at city and building levels

Education on design of shelter (fire)

Governance

GIS support

Evidence-based modelling

Online building submission, approval and by-law enforcement, electronic monitoring

Land

Urban planning and zoning Integration/ mixed use

Change Management

Densification

Municipal Systems

Transport and mobility

Municipal Spatial Development Framework

Green roads and under-road water storage

Cycle paths

Objectives and timeframes for the Priority interventions listed above were then further developed in groups with the aid of the Visualising chart, below.

Group

nominated

INTERVENTION

#1*

GREYWATER

RECYCLING

and

RAINWATER

HARVESTING

Group

nominated

INTERVENTION

#3*

Description of intervention

Applicability 0 – 2 yrs 2 – 5 yrs 5 – 10 yrs Negatives?

Rapid report

back

6 mins per

group

Hint – Fill this column in first

Hint – Fill this column in second…

Fill these columns in last

Portfolio of accredited products, regulations and policy updated

100% of officials “trained”Procurementartisans

Greywater/rainwater in new homes were appropriate

ISSUE Benefits?

Personal health and wellbeingEnvironmentalEconomicSocietal

Greywater/rainwater in new homes were appropriate

New homesRural settlementsInformal settlements

Group work

60 minutesVisualising chart

2a. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT Intervention - Green building policyTop three barriers

Technological factors Technologies are varied - it is not always possible to provide guidance/reference to this

Policy and regulatory framework Different cities have responded in different ways to the need for green buildings - some ,for instance, have developed by-laws. This could be updated to other municipalities.

Other Awareness of existing by-laws and city/community experiences to those in need

What products, technologies and services are needed to overcome the top three barriers identified and unlock opportunity?

Wide knowledge of built environment and related policies needed

Who unlocks: who should lead the initiative and what partnerships are needed?

An online platform to collate existing by-laws

What additional infrastructure would be needed for the intervention to succeed?

BE and related policies

Barriers and enablers

Participants were invited to individually complete a form on any intervention of their choice from amongst the Priority interventions identified. The forms addressed “Technologies and Knowledge Base” and “Enablers and Resources”. A selection of the top three barriers was required. Participants were encouraged to respond to interventions relevant to their field of expertise, so not all Priority interventions were addressed. Responses from the workshop are tabulated below:

1a. TECHNOLOGIES, EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS Intervention - Mainstreaming alternative sanitationTop three barriers

Technological factors No new innovation funding, regulatory barrier, no uptakeDemand Lack of industry, lock in of tech and supply, behaviourCultural and perception factors No sanitation market, no standards, building regulations

Skills and knowledgeLack of skills and capacity, New approaches for business,change at municipal level

Production factorsSET platform weak, no investment in higher education, no new model

Policy and regulatory framework Yes, blockage, NBR/PolicyWhat products, technologies and services are needed to overcome the top three barriers identified and unlock opportunity? New innovations, change of NBR/policy, merging marketWhat capabilities are required? New cohort of skills and capacityWho unlocks: who should lead the initiative and what partnerships are needed? DST, DTI, DWS,DHS and science councils. What additional skills would be needed for the intervention to succeed? New courses at higher educationWhat additional resources would be needed for the intervention? More innovative

What policy instruments are needed? Policy existsWhat is the likelihood of success? High

1a. TECHNOLOGIES, EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS Intervention - Mainstreaming alternative sanitation technologiesBarriers

Technological factorsSome alternatives have been poorly implemented and have earned a bad report

DemandMost people aspire to waterborne flush sanitation or a VIP latrine in rural areas

Cultural and perception factorsPeople don’t want to consider re-use of sanitation recovered products

Production factorsSome technologies need to be upgraded to quality production level

Investment factors Municipalities not wanting to risk new technologiesInfrastructure and maintenance factors Definitely a major factor - maintenanceUndesirable social or environmental effects Many sophisticated systems fail and result in a septic mess


Need to recognise that conventional waterborne sanitation is here to stay. Need low-flush toilets, decentralised waste water treatment, passive waste water treatment

What capabilities are required? education and awareness. Civil engineering for green roadsWho unlocks: who should lead the initiative and what partnerships are needed?

Key municipalities can lead the way (e.g. eThekwini) and WRC and department of water and sanitation

What additional skills would be needed for the intervention to succeed? Micro biologists, system designers, sanitation experts, industrialists What additional resources would be needed for the intervention? Funds, sites to pilot, Laboratory facilitiesWhat additional infrastructure would be needed for the intervention to succeed? Funds, sites to pilot, Laboratory facilities

What policy instruments are needed? Promotion of alternative sanitation systems, reuse and recovery of resources from wastes

What is the likelihood of success? Generally good with reference to waterborne systems

1a. TECHNOLOGIES, EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS Intervention - Mainstreaming alternative sanitation (fit-for-purpose)Top three barriers

Cultural and perception factorsAlternative sanitation systems are often not accepted by residents where expectation may be for full flush system

Skills and knowledge

Lack awareness of the benefits and reliability of alternative sanitation systems hinders uptake by end users, and also municipalities at a system -wide level

Investment factors

Getting products to market needs business support to innovators. And competition commission should address actions by dominant conventional technology companies


A system of business support to innovators. Awareness raises amongst municipalities and residents

What capabilities are required? MarketingWho unlocks: who should lead the initiative and what partnerships are needed? WRC, CSIR, DHS, DWAWhat additional skills would be needed for the intervention to succeed? Coordinated action between housing, water, sanitation departments (IGR)What additional resources would be needed for the intervention? Funding to raise awareness of already available sanitation solutionsWhat additional infrastructure would be needed for the intervention to succeed? Off grid systems may require less infrastructure

What policy instruments are needed? Regulations to ensure water efficiency - performance standards

What is the likelihood of success?Does require strong political will, coordinated action and cross cutting finding = medium to high chance of success

1b. PLANNING Intervention - Smart management of waterBarriers

Technological factors Unavailability of techProduction factors Specialist resources will be required to implementInvestment factors Funding for this inventionInfrastructure and maintenance factors Training will be required for maintenance

What additional skills would be needed for the intervention to succeed? Training and knowledgeWhat additional resources would be needed for the intervention? SpecialistsWhat additional infrastructure would be needed for the intervention to succeed? Smart mayors

What policy instruments are needed?What is the likelihood of success? high likelihood

2a. REGULATIONS, POLICY AND LAW Intervention - Green building policyBarriers

Technological factors Unproven

DemandEnd-user do not see the need to reduce CO2 emissions in creating energy efficiency

Cultural and perception factorsEnd-users may reject tech perceive to unlock the values and most important preferences (non-renewable)

Skills and knowledgeCity does not have competence and skills to implement green building by law

Production factors Specialised product skill (building tech) may be lackingInvestment factors Risk aversive and dependence on prey tech companyInfrastructure and maintenance factors Inadequacy of infrastructure capabilityUndesirable social or environmental effects Undesireable social impact (perception)Policy and regulatory framework Policies can be a disincentive to invest in new techOther Support of other city departments

What products, technologies and services are needed to overcome the top three barriers identified and unlock opportunity? Development of bylaw by expertsWhat capabilities are required? A wave policy, green building and policy engagement capacityWho unlocks: who should lead the initiative and what partnerships are needed? multi-stakeholder especially city, home owners and private sectorWhat additional skills would be needed for the intervention to succeed? Train Building Control Officers in Green net zero carbon (NZC)What additional resources would be needed for the intervention? Budget and commitmentWhat additional infrastructure would be needed for the intervention to succeed? Training manuals

What policy instruments are needed? IncentivesWhat is the likelihood of success? high likelihood

2a. TECHNOLOGIES, EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS Intervention - Green buildingBarriers

Demand Demand for lower costCultural and perception factors Some, for example, waterless urinalsSkills and knowledge YesProduction factors Yes, not localInvestment factors Yes, need more local productionInfrastructure and maintenance factors Yes, ie. Waterless WC'sUndesirable social or environmental effects No - Cost problems. Health if not managedPolicy and regulatory framework Yes, sanitation waterless not catered forOther Insufficient local types

What products, technologies and services are needed to overcome the top three barriers identified and unlock opportunity? Social acceptability and much lower CSTS/subsidise/ban/tax and othersWhat capabilities are required? KnowledgeWho unlocks: who should lead the initiative and what partnerships are needed? DTI - Tax/Ban technologies. Municipalities - implementWhat additional skills would be needed for the intervention to succeed? Green building skillsWhat additional resources would be needed for the intervention? Municipal enforcement of technologies. Money for subsidiesWhat additional infrastructure would be needed for the intervention to succeed? Waterless sanitation - composting

What policy instruments are needed? Requirement to implement green building by-lawsWhat is the likelihood of success? Good, happened elsewhere

2b. TECHNOLOGIES, EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS Intervention - SheltersBarriers

Technological factors Low demand, costly supplyDemand Low demand because of cost

Cultural and perception factorsLack of buy in - government not including the community in design and building process

Skills and knowledge Failure to implement correctly because of lack of skillWhat products, technologies and services are needed to overcome the top three barriers identified and unlock opportunity? Knowledge dissemination/ Communication / TrainingWhat capabilities are required? Knowledge on building systems / ConstructionWho unlocks: who should lead the initiative and what partnerships are needed? Government / Community membersWhat additional skills would be needed for the intervention to succeed? Soft skillsWhat additional resources would be needed for the intervention? Training

What policy instruments are needed? Green building and building regulationsWhat is the likelihood of success? Good

3a. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT Intervention – Governance GIS supportTop three barriers

Demand

Typically relates to local government. Inadequate skills and inability to grasp the longer picture. Human resource or our human capacity will most likely be reluctant to change.

Cultural and perception factorsInformed settlements do not understand the benefits of alternative infrastructure solutions

Skills and knowledgeUnskilled municipal practitioners infrastructure. End user will most likely require training


Knowledge sharing portals that enables info on new technology. Training service, GIS or other system based on technology.

What capabilities are required? Skills and training (else it will be business as usual)Who unlocks: who should lead the initiative and what partnerships are needed? For the municipal environment (SALGA). Local government/SALGA.

What additional skills would be needed for the intervention to succeed?

A comprehension or training course lecturing human settlements practitioners about alternatives to current RDP/subsidy model. GIS and tech skills.

What additional resources would be needed for the intervention?

Library or resources about what alternatives cost. System designers and license requirements

What additional infrastructure would be needed for the intervention to succeed?

Portals/websites/communication material. Software.

What policy instruments are needed? Force municipalities to include a chapter in their municipal development plans on innovation. Regulation will need to change in order for technology to be implemented. Building regulation, municipal by-laws. Green buildings, financial policy instruments

What is the likelihood of success? Good, but it will require commitment. High.

3c. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT Intervention - Government of performance specification to ITTop three barriers

Technological factorsTo an extent yes. Technologies are actually continually evolving. Some are unproven.

DemandDo not see the importance of enforcement (and hence not willing to allocate resources to it).

Cultural and perception factors

End-users value their perceived rights over values benefitting the community, especially if the community is out of sight (eg. downstream)

Skills and knowledge Uninformed. Implementation (not production) skills in short supply.Production factors Currently yes, if demand increases. This will fall away.Investment factors Yes, own deficient. Infrastructure and maintenance factors UnlikelyUndesirable social or environmental effects YesPolicy and regulatory framework Political will = A big oneOther Conscious and aware decision makers

Who unlocks: who should lead the initiative and what partnerships are needed?

Who leads? All players - government and society, innovators. Partnerships: As demand increases, these will evolve

What additional resources would be needed for the intervention? Great variety: finance (public and private)What additional infrastructure would be needed for the intervention to succeed? Monitoring devices etc.

What policy instruments are needed? Performance specifications, controls and skills. Accountability changed social behavior

What is the likelihood of success? In some places high and in others low

4b. TECHNOLOGIES, EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS Intervention - Innovative building technologiesBarriers

Technological factorsTechnology lacks complementary technology needs to make it effective

Demand Demands are high in valuesCultural and perception factors Different opinion due to lack of skillsSkills and knowledge Risk of employing unskilled people

Production factorsRisk of given job to unskilled persons who cannot perform work properly

What additional skills would be needed for the intervention to succeed? Training of resources on specialised skills to perform jobWhat additional resources would be needed for the intervention? Budget sufficient enough for training unskilled resourcesWhat additional infrastructure would be needed for the intervention to succeed?

Serviced stands. Allow community title deeds as proof of ownership of serviced stands

What policy instruments are needed? NHBRC and National Building Regulations

What is the likelihood of success?Community workshops to educate them about new building technology. Training of competent people to perform the job

5a. PLANNING Intervention - DensificationBarriers

DemandCultural buy-in/willingness for change, private cars seen as 'goal' vs. public transport. Short term beneficial vision

Cultural and perception factorsApplicability to SA context - reject public transport, not safe/attractive to cycle

Production factorsCombined transport/road and water specialists required for improved storm water/ run off systems

Investment factorsBuy in to public transport - current inefficiencies are a detering factor to buy in

Infrastructure and maintenance factors Cycle lanes required - safety is a challenge

Undesirable social or environmental effectsTOD - urban heat islands, risks of high densites on social issues. TOD without adequate public transport = more traffic

Policy and regulatory frameworkImproved policies required. Implementation of policies and regulations


Increased affordable housing (Higher densities with bulk services). Adequate punlic transport. Green road innovations

Who unlocks: who should lead the initiative and what partnerships are needed? Public-private (municipalities and private developers/investors)What additional skills would be needed for the intervention to succeed? Spatial planners, engineers (cross-discipline)What additional resources would be needed for the intervention? Land for developmentWhat additional infrastructure would be needed for the intervention to succeed?

Increased high density development. Bulk services infrastructure. Road infrastructure to facilitate public transport and cycle lanes / NMT

What policy instruments are needed? Push and pull factors for private investment and social buy in

5b. TECHNOLOGIES, EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS Intervention - Green roads and under-road storageTop three barriers

Demand Insufficient buy-in from government and municipal levelProduction factors Huge infrastructure cost associated that may limit investmentInfrastructure and maintenance factors Infrastructure does not exist

What products, technologies and services are needed to overcome the top three barriers identified and unlock opportunity? Investment buy in - technology needs to be attractiveWhat capabilities are required? Education and awareness. Civil engineering for green roadsWho unlocks: who should lead the initiative and what partnerships are needed?

National government - water and sanitation with province and municipalities. DEA. WRC. TIA. Department of public works

What additional skills would be needed for the intervention to succeed?

Tech skills - Engineering for under road stress factors - prevent collapse. Spatial planning skills - identification of most appropriate stress are as

What additional resources would be needed for the intervention? Financial, capability, technology supportWhat additional infrastructure would be needed for the intervention to succeed?

Under road storage systems that can withstand stress. Design innovation using current infrastructure

What policy instruments are needed? Water conservation, Climate - CO2 emissions, health and safetyWhat is the likelihood of success? Likely - if pilot succeeds and can be showcased

Concern was raised that too few persons were in attendance.

Planning Committee agreed process yielded 22 participants. A benchmarking exercise suggests Technology Roadmapping should target not more than 30 delegates, with about 20 preferable. The number of participants was within range. The CSIR will take a proactive role in identifying and inviting workshop participants.

Concern was raised that the attendance at the meeting was not representative of the sector.

The GP consultative workshop attracted participation from 11 organisations. The concern that these do not fully represent the sector is somewhat warranted, GP consultative workshop may be repeated.

Channels were followed in accordance with protocols and in accordance with Planning Committee resolution. However DHS DGs letter to HODs reaching delegated officials with insufficient notice for the first two workshops

despite persistent and active follow up from DHS.

Concern was raised that DHS was not present.

National DHS was represented by two delegates, and received full support of their executive. Provincial DHS was represented. Municipal level participation was suboptimal, due to date confusion. Other sector departments (other than water) were not represented. A second Gauteng provincial consultation will be scheduled.

DST raised the concern that there were “too many” CSIR representatives.

CSIR was well-represented in the first workshop (4 facilitators & 2 participants) in order to ensure that a sufficient number of staff were capacitated to facilitate workshops in provinces. No action remedial action planned.

It was recommended to consider revising the definition of human settlements -consider the scope of the project (based on this definition).

The definition was crafted in consultation with the National Department of Human Settlements and presented to the STI 4 SHS Steering Committee. Recommendation noted.

Workshop feedback

Delegate registration, anonymising and tracking procedure (colour coding) considered successful.

Retained.

The STI 4 SHS Roadmap Project overview was considered good; but some redundancy in Workshop Overview.

Two presentations consolidated.

Global and megatrends presentations (incorporating trends analysis report) and provincial risk trajectories report was considered excellent.

Retained.

It was recommended to emphasise the focus on STI for SHS in the briefing document and during the workshop.

Refine wording in instructions. Process refined.

Documents reengineered and piloted in Northern Cape:

Revised agenda;

Revised briefing note;

Revised templates.

The immediate identification of interventions without reference to the core issues was premature in the process.

Reorder activities in workshop.

The individual activities to be completed at the end: “Technologies and Knowledge Base” and “Enablers and Resources” was confusing.

Reallocate as group work and integrate into matrix.

It was recommended to shorten the workshop briefing note.

Briefing note reviewed and streamlined.

Formal feedback process on consultative workshop needed.

Feedback forms drafted and included in workshop pack (piloted in Northern Cape).

Concern was raised in data coding, analysis and report writing.

Process was refined.

AnalysisData

Data ELT

As recorded above, the following qualitative data points were captured from the workshop:

Needs n= 81

Priority interventions n= 14

Response tables n = 13

Three initial interventions were excluded because they did not relate to the household or neighbourhood scale (n=1), they related to consumables (n=1); or they were not associated with science, technology or innovation (n=1).

Likelihood of success13 of the 17 Response tables received expressed a high to very high likelihood of success for priority interventions, whilst the remaining four were unresponsive.

Benefits

Benefits to implementation of priority interventions as identified in the Response tables were distributed as follows:

Themes

The top five elements as determined by participant vote were as follows: Water and sanitation

Shelter and construction

Governance

Land

Transport and mobility

By means of desktop classification, researchers grouped the Many interventions and needs into themes fields as shown below.

Environmental35%

Personal health and wellbeing

12%Economic 16%

Societal37%

All the Many interventions and needs from the workshop were categorised into common themes which are plotted on the Themes by Count Treemap below. Areas are proportional to the number of times a theme appeared. Voting resulted in a shift in emphasis compared to the initial themes identified which are illustrated below. This is significant in moderating for bias, which may have arisen as a result of the high number of workshop participants being in water-related professional fields.

OTHER WATER AND SANITATION

PLANNINGSHELTER & CONSTRUCTION

FOOD

Themes by Count Treemap

Water and sanitation Shelter and construction

Governance Land Transport Other

Regulation, policy or law

Planning

Knowledge management

Technologies, equipment and operations

Pain pointsThe Many interventions and needs from the workshop were categorised according to one of four Key issues categories namely; Regulation, policy or law; Planning; Knowledge management; or Technologies, equipment and operations, obtained from workshop inputs. This was in order to determine where the “Pain points” are. The size of the dots demonstrate the number of times the Keyissue was identified by workshop participants. The significance is that, whilst generally regulation, policy or law is considered less of a Key issue, attention is needed across all Key issues for all identified interventions..

BarriersBarriers to uptake of STI 4 SHS for selected interventions as identified in the Response tables were distributed as follows:

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Technological factors.

Demand.

Cultural and perception factors.

Skills and knowledge.

Production factors.

Investment factors.

Infrastructure and maintenance factors.

Undesirable social and/or environmental…

Policy and regulatory framework.

Other

The top six barriers identified in descending order of frequency were demand; cultural and perception factors; technological factors; production factors; skills and knowledge; and policy and regulatory framework.

Key risksAlthough not discussed in the GP workshop, a Key risk as identified in precedent road map studies is vested interests which can present a fatal barrier to Roadmap buy-in. In the context of STI 4 SHS the identified risks are to revenue collection from utilities in the event of gaining independence from municipal services (eg. energy, water and waste). Science, Technology and Innovation which may result in job losses may be untenable.

Skills and knowledge emerged as the most important enabler from workshop input; followed by tools, systems and processes, with finance, policy instruments also being identified as important. Of importance is that tools, systems and processes were associated strongly with planning and integration activities. Resources, infrastructure were strongly associated with manufacture and supply. The following Critical success factors were recognised: leadership and culture; tested, verified and updated performance library, and a healthy innovation pipeline (with exciting/ inspirational value).

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Tools, systemsprocesses

Skills andknowledge

Additionalresources

Additionalinfrastructure

Policyinstruments

Finance

Water and sanitation Shelter and construction Governance

Land Transport and mobility

EnablersThe top six enablers to uptake of STI 4 SHS for selected interventions as identified from analysis of the Response tables as follows:

Qualitative SynthesisThe data collected and analysed above was synthesised as follows:

A Basic pathway for uptake of STI in SHS was described, with elements in the lifecycle value chain represented as a sequential flow from strategic planning, through selection, supply, implementation, operation and disposal. According to green economy principles, the disposal phase should be considered in the strategic planning phase, however this did not feature in the GP workshop input, and is indicated as a weak link.

Enablers from the workshop input were overlaid on the Basic pathway.

Barriers and Key risks from the workshop were overlaid on the basic pathway. The icons indicate the position and relative importance (by size) of barriers.

Priority Interventions from the

workshop were overlaid on the Basic pathway. These will need support across the full value chain, as illustrated in the “Pain points” graph shown earlier. From visualising chart, icons are placed in the pathway at the point at which 0-2 year interventions were closest fit. (i.e. where workshop participants identified as the starting point for achieving the Priority interventions).

Indicative players as identified in the workshop (from the Response tables) were placed on the Basic pathway in the location related to their primary role as identified in the STI 4 SHS Status Quo Report. Stakeholders in grey were identified previously, but not identified in the provincial consultative workshop.

Feedback loops are important to establish to ensure that during the implementation phase of the Roadmap project, robust and relevant M&E can occur, and an adaptive

management approach can be implemented. The first draft feedback loops have been indicated on the overlay.

Preliminary clusters

From the qualitative synthesis described above, a number of preliminary clusters were identified as follows:

Human settlements planning, delivery models, strategic planning, technology clearing and supply side support.

Quality check

Clusters were reviewed by researchers to determine whether overall Roadmap objectives are furthered. Do the clusters overcome conservatism?, stimulate investment?, provide decision support?

The procedure described above is illustrated below.

RecycleDecommission

RepurposeAbandon

Strategise, plan and regulate

Specify, select & procure

Manufacture and supply

Implement, install or construct

Use and maintain

Basic pathway for STI uptake in SHS

RecycleDecommission

RepurposeAbandon





Use and maintain

POLICYFUNDING

AWARENESS AND INCENTIVES

KNOWLEDGESKILLS

TOOLSSYSTEMSPROCESSES

RESOURCESCAPABILITIES

Enablers and critical success factors for STI uptake in SHS

Innovate, localise

demonstrate

Leadership and culture

Test, verify and update shared performance

library

RecycleDecommission

RepurposeAbandon





Use and maintain

Barriers and risks for STI uptake in SHSInnovate, localise

demonstrate

Production factors

Technological factors

PolicySkills

Demand

Cultural and perception

Vested interest and threats


library


RecycleDecommission

RepurposeAbandon





Use and maintain

Innovate, localise

demonstrate

Priority interventions

Water

Shelter

Governance

Land

Transport


library


1

1a

1b

1c

2a

2

2b

3

3a 3b 3c

4

4a

4b

4c

5

5c

5b

5a

1a. Alternative sanitation tech; 1b. Smart water management; 1c.Provincial water roadmaps; 2a. Green building; 2b. Shelterdesign; 3a. GIS support; 3b. Evidence-based modelling; 3c. Onlinebuilding submission, etc.; 4a. Urban planning; 4b. Densification;4c. Municipal Systems; 5a. Municipal Spatial DevelopmentFramework; 5b. Green roads; 5c. Cycle paths

RecycleDecommission

RepurposeAbandon





Use and maintain

Indicative players

Grass roots innovatorsEntrepreneursNGOs

DSTCSIRTIAUniversities

Investors and venture capitalistsInnovation hubDTI/NRCS

AgrementNHBRCSABS

SpecialistsConsultantsEngineersDHSDEADWSSALGA

ContractorsSMMEsPrivate sectorHome owners

ContractorsSMMEsHome owners

Private sectorSMMEsIndustry

PRESIDENCYDHSDWSSALGADoEDPWDTIDRDLRDEAIGR

TREASURYGovernment as

revenue collectorOrganised labour

CBEUniversities

MetrosMunicipalitiesDevelopersHDA

Innovate, localise

demonstrate


library


RecycleDecommission

RepurposeAbandon





Use and maintain

UptakeFit and attractivenessUnintended consequences

ImpactPerformance

AvailabilityCost & quality

FitAttractiveness

Cost, quality & scalability Innovate,

localise demonstrate

Cost, quality & scalability

Feedback loopsTest, verify and update shared performance

library


RecycleDecommission

RepurposeAbandon





Use and maintain

POLICYFUNDING

AWARENESS AND INCENTIVES

KNOWLEDGESKILLS

TOOLSSYSTEMSPROCESSES

RESOURCESCAPABILITIES

Enablers and critical success factors for STI uptake in SHS

Innovate, localise

demonstrate



library

UptakeFit and attractivenessUnintended consequences

ImpactPerformance

AvailabilityCost & quality

Cost, quality & scalability

Cost, quality & scalability Grass roots

innovatorsEntrepreneursNGOs

DSTCSIRTIAUniversities

Investors and venture capitalistsInnovation hubDTI/NRCS

AgrementNHBRCSABS

SpecialistsConsultantsEngineersDHSDEADWSSALGA

ContractorsSMMEsPrivate sectorHome owners

ContractorsSMMEsHome owners

Private sectorSMMEsIndustry

PRESIDENCYDHSDWSSALGADoEDPWDTIDRDLRDEAIGR

TREASURYGovernment as

revenue collectorOrganised labour

CBEUniversities

MetrosMunicipalitiesDevelopersHDA

Priority interventions

1

1a

1b

1c

2a

2

2b

3

3a 3b 3c

4

4a

4b

4c

5

5c

5b

5a

1a. Alternative sanitation tech; 1b. Smart water management; 1c.Provincial water roadmaps; 2a. Green building; 2b. Shelterdesign; 3a. GIS support; 3b. Evidence-based modelling; 3c. Onlinebuilding submission, etc.; 4a. Urban planning; 4b. Densification;4c. Municipal Systems; 5a. Municipal Spatial DevelopmentFramework; 5b. Green roads; 5c. Cycle paths

Production factors

Technological factors

PolicySkills

Demand

Cultural and perception

Vested interest and threats

CLUSTERS

Delivery models

Strategic projects

Technology clearing

Supply-side

support

Human settlements

planning

Qualitative synthesis

CLUSTERS

Delivery models

Strategic projects

Technology clearing

Supply-side

support

Human settlements

planning

Qualitative synthesisDiscussionThe inputs from the GP Provincial Consultative workshop will be consolidated with inputs from other provinces, as well as inputs from other stakeholder groups (See Appendix B for stakeholder engagement strategy).

There is an emphasis from inputs received on strategic, planning and governance aspects, which may reflect the bias of the target stakeholder group (government). However through further engagement it might be expected that the suggested clusters will be refined and will change through the process.

Remapping the priority interventionsWith the preliminary clusters identified above, the Priority interventions were mapped in Opportunity clusters as shown below.

provide decision support

overcome conservatism

stimulate investment

overcome conservatism

overcome conservatism stimulate investment provide decision support

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

stimulate investment P

OPPORTUNITIES

Advanced & integrated decision-making

______________

Enforcement and governance

Identification, acquisition and tenure models______________Development policy innovation______________Finance innovation

Tech vetting______________ Soft landings______________Skillsdevelopment ______________ Knowledge sharing

Social and grass-roots innovation____________Technology diffusion______________ Manufacturing localisation

Settlement upgrade & accelerator programme______________Flagship projects______________Climate change

Human settlement planning

Delivery modelTechnology clearing

Supply-side support

Strategic Projects

Op

po

rtu

nit

ies

Clu

ste

rsDrivers Enablers Barriers

Cluster: Human settlement planning

OPPORTUNITY

Advanced & integrated decision-making (16 -> 5)

_______________

Enforcement and governance (5->3)

Interventions identified in consultative processes:

Macro-spatial planning, protection of resources, Provincial water roadmap Evidence-based scenario planning Urban settlements planning tools; Mixed zoning with non-hazardous industries;

Integrated modelling and spatial system Formalisation and demonstration through high rise buildings. Resettling in

integrated human settlement projects which have used new building technologies; Compact cities and higher densities; Higher density housing, new management models aided by IT (e.g. access control); Urban high rises; Compact, modular apartments

Stormwater modelling

Monitoring water loss; More stringent enforcement aided by IT, effluent quality, water leaks, building housing; Metered systems with rationing

Online tool to assess development and building plan applications for compliance with by-laws (and enable) enforcement

Electronic monitoring and evaluation systems

Cluster: Housing delivery model

OPPORTUNITYIdentification, acquisition and tenure models

______________Development policy innovation

______________Finance innovation

Transport policy review – location Municipal by-law Influencing municipal policy and by-laws Rapid servicing of land with resource-efficient systems Clustered and well-resourced human settlements Allocation of land for urban agriculture

Soft landings

Indigenous knowledge systems and natural building methods Maintenance of water infrastructure More choice in housing design and construction Virtual reality classrooms App development to educate learners IT-enabled working from home


Cluster: Technology clearing

OPPORTUNITY

Tech vetting

______________ Skillsdevelopment and knowledge sharing

Rainwater harvesting Waste water purification and treatment Water efficiency management systems and tools, including smart-

metering Mainstreaming alternative sanitation technology

Education on design of shelter Appropriate settlements and housing designs implemented New cohort of skills and capacities Selection of construction materials and design of housing or

neighbourhood Improved data of innovative materials Use demo sites to gather data on performance of innovative materials and

technologies


Cluster: Supply side support

OPPORTUNITYSocial and grass-roots innovation____________Technology diffusion______________ Manufacturing localisation

Different materials like woods and boards are very cheap and easy to assemble; Building materials; Innovative building technologies; Smart building methods

Smart-metering Water technology to generate electricity; Passive waste water treatment with

resource recovery; Waste to energy Duel pipe (reuse) systems Very efficient cooking devices Point of use water treatment/ filtration Waterless sanitation; Waterless toilets; Chemical toilets; Low pour flush

sanitation Improved roofing to withstand flash-flooding in rural areas Microgrids Renewable energy; Alternative sources; Renewable energy - solar, small-scale

hydropower

Production of building materials using raw materials Informal settlement waste bundling and capture Small-scale food production; Household food gardens


Cluster: Strategic projects

OPPORTUNITYSettlement upgrade & accelerator programme______________Flagship projects______________Climate change

Use of drones for improved surveillance Cargo cycles

Green building standards; Green building at city and building levels Ceilings in houses to absorb heat Build adaptive settlements; Climate sensitive planning and settlements Green building for reduced greenhouse gas emission; CO2 emissions with urban

farming; Reduce transport CO2 emissions Adaptive settlements for flooding Urban farming; Urban greening and food production

Upgrade settlements; Settlement with integrated livelihoods Increased public transport; Multi-nodal transport, compact, densify; Transit

oriented development; More use of public transport; Cycle paths Design towns and cities to be more safe Waste reuse, collection, waste to energy Efficient water tanks; Rainwater harvesting


• STI 4 SHS Forum

• Electronic surveys 1 & 2

• National workshop

ALL

Way forward

Various inputs consolidated

• Steering Committee

• Planning Committee

• Project team

PROJECT

• Roadmap advisory panel

• Specialist Interviews, as identified

ADVISORY

• Out-of-the-Box Conference

• Academia and NSI Advisory

ACADEMIA

• Exhibition

• Innovations register

• Black-box session

• Case book

INDUSTRY

• Incubation forum

• Investors Roundtable

INVESTORS

Clusters, profiles and priorities

Gap analysis

Opportunities and benefits analysis

Selection framework

Targets

Investment pipeline

Costing

Implementation plan

Monitoring and evaluation plan

CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOPS AND INTERVIEWS

Demand-side needs

-STI programmes

-projects

-strategies

-initiatives

Barriers

WEBSITE AND ELECTRONIC SURVEY

Supply-side barriers

DESKTOP RESEARCH

Innovation trends

-international

-local

Opportunities to be appraised

• Prioritised

• Validated

• Impact

• Shortlisted

Interventions identified in the desktop reviews, and in provincial consultative workshops will be sorted according to opportunity clusters and prioritised in accordance with “key issues” identified in the workshop engagement. The three interventions obtaining the most votes per workshop will be validated.

The validation process will systematically evaluate costs, and benefits, per intervention taking both demand and supply into consideration. These are to be compared to existing capabilities in consultation with expert advisors. Overall likelihood of success will be estimated, based on consolidation of validation criteria. Quick wins will be identified.

Alignment with vulnerabilities and goals selected from the NUA, NDP, SDGs and IUDF will be assessed, to determine the potential impact of each intervention. The impacts will be consolidated to cluster level.

Based on the prioritisation, validation, and impact assessments, the interventions will be ranked according to their strategic alignment, value, likelihood of success and impact. This is the draft investment portfolio. Collaborators and partners will be identified for the most promising technologies, and a draft implementation plan will be co-created.

Draft RoadmapThe advanced Draft STI 4 SHS Roadmap is currently scheduled for June 2019. It will set out a 10 year plan for a coordinated

investment and collaboration plan between key stakeholders. Following various targeted engagements, including the Provincial

Consultative Workshop series, a Draft STI 4 SHS Roadmap Framework will be presented which will summarise the status quo,

opportunities, define an investment portfolio and provide a detailed implementation plan.

To stay abreast of project progress and opportunities to participate, register as a STI 4 SHS Forum member at www.sti4shs.co.za.


AcknowledgementsProject sponsors

Department of Science and Technology

Project managers

Technology Innovation Agency

National coordinators

Mapula Letshweni SALGA

Tenda Rasikhanya Department of Water and Sanitation

Ngube Thokwana; Hlengiwa Koopa and Matsimbi Mokondo Human Settlements

Engagement preparation

Coralie Van Reenen, Jeremy Gibberd, Mapule Letshweni, Beth Crankshaw, Peta De Jager, Jennifer Mirembe, Lorato Motsatsi,

Mark Napier, Francois Prinsloo, Tshepang Mosiea, Hlengiwe Koopa, Matsimbi Mokondo, Sizo Sebake, Linda Godfrey, Tiyani Ngoveni

Workshop facilitator and anchors

Francois Prinsloo, Lorato Motsatsi; Coralie van Reenen CSIR

Administration, logistics, data and electronic proceedings

Letta Chale, Renee Koen and Sheldon Bole CSIR

References

Le Roux, A. 2018. The Green Book: Risk trajectories of South African settlements - Gauteng initial findings.

Gibberd, J. 2018. Mega-challenges and trends in human settlements. STI 4 SHS Provincial Consultative Workshop: GAUTENG

http://www.sti4shs.co.za/sites/default/files/2018-09/GP%20HumanSettlementsTrends.pdf

Napier, M., Sebake, N., Crankshaw, B. 2018. Science Technology and Innovation for Human Settlements Roadmap Desktop Review Trends

Report: STI 4 SHS – DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION (23 October 2018).

This document is part of the STI 4 SHS Provincial Consultative Workshop Report series, which can be accessed at www.sti4shs.co.za(Events - past events)

http://www.sti4shs.co.za/sites/default/files/2018-09/GP HumanSettlementsTrends.pdf


After Tam, 2012, p10

Establish Planning Committee; identify Common purpose, scope, terms of references and method

40 key stakeholders

Steering Committee vision to frame long-term goals and objectives

20 decision-makers

E-survey + 9x stakeholder workshops to identify projects, gaps, opportunities, barriers & priorities

300 stakeholders +

Cost -benefit

Expert judgement and consensus

Preparation Visioning Roadmap development Implement & refine

Data & analysis

Public participation

Quarterly Expert Committee meetings for 10-year implementation period to invest & steer

20 decision-makers

Conduct a status quo trend analysis and investigate STI 4 SHS

Future scenarios for sustainable human settlements, STI opportunities, capabilities, potential, maturity and industry readiness

Define an investment portfolio of Roadmap activities and projects

Focused technical input via interview

Monitor & evaluate implementation and update plan

Investment partners

National workshop and draft publish for comment

Months 1 - 4 Months 1 - 6 Months 1 - 18 Years 1 - 12

Appendix A - Roadmap definition process

Extract from Roadmap Review report of the STI 4 SHS Draft Status Quo Report.

NSI Academia Private sector & business

Investor Regulator GovernmentNGOs and

NPOs

Appendix B - Targeted engagements strategy at a glance

Project structures

• Steering Committee

• Planning Committee

• Project team

Ad hoc

• Interviews, as identified

Provincial workshops

• Roadmap advisory panel

Academic advisory

• Out-of-the-Box Conference

• Scientific & review Committee

• Academia and NSI meeting

Off-the-Wall Showcase

• Exhibition

• Innovations register

• Black-box session

• Case book

Investor Roundtable

• Incubation forum

• Cost models

STI4SHS Forum

• Website portal

• Electronic surveys 1 & 2

• National workshop

For further information refer to the Stakeholder Engagement Strategy in the STI 4 SHS Draft Status Quo Report.