fire sprinkler systems and the changes to bs 9251
TRANSCRIPT
Canute LLP
1Canute LLPFIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMSBS 9251 : 2014 - AN INTRODUCTION
Hydraulic Calculation Software for the fire protection industry
Canute LLP
2BS 9251 : 2014CHANGES TO THE STANDARD
Canute LLP
3
http://www.canutesoft.com
Topics covered Major changes to the standard Cautionary notes Preliminary work and consultation
Category of system Design – only the following
Minimum design parameters – table 2 Head spacing Minimum head requirements
Canute LLP
4
http://www.canutesoft.com
Introduction The Bsi technical review panel FSH/18/2 – BS 9251 has
taken 18 months of deliberation All major stakeholders have consulted including BRE,
BAFSA, Fire & Rescue Service, RSA, Water Undertakings and Building Control
The committee received and reviewed 328 comments to the proposed standard at DPC stage.
The standard is comprehensively different to the previous and will take some adjustment
BS 9251:2014 standard will be implemented on October 31st 2014 and the 2005 edition will be withdrawn.
Canute LLP
5
http://www.canutesoft.com
Major changes
The term ‘residential’ and ‘domestic’ have been removed in favour of categories 1, 2 and 3.
The system design is now based on the discharge density and the number of heads operating.
The standard recognises the one size cannot fit all and talks about ‘special circumstances’.
Where the system is used for ‘compensatory features’ additional requirements may be needed.
Standard talks about ‘vulnerable people’.
Canute LLP
6
http://www.canutesoft.com
Cautionary note BS 9251:2014 is a code of practice not a standard. It offers guidance and recommendations. It should not be quoted as a ‘specification’ document. If you deviate from the standard you are expected to
be able to justify your course of action. The BS is to be used by appropriately qualified and
experienced people.
Canute LLP
7
http://www.canutesoft.com
Cautionary note
Compliance with the British standard cannot confirm immunity from legal obligations. If you are legally obliged to do something then this is implied
and may not be referred to within the standard An example would be you must always comply with water
regulations and this standard does not detail all the regulations.
The new standard is considerably different and you need to read it all – DON'T CHERRY PICK
Canute LLP
8
http://www.canutesoft.com
Consultation
Water undertaker Fire authority Licensing authority Building control Insurer(s) of the building &
contents The client The list is not limited!
The standard requires you consult at an early stage (enquiry or design?)
Type of occupancy Compensatory features Vulnerable people Mixed use
Canute LLP
9
http://www.canutesoft.com
What we need to consider
Is BS 9251:2014 suitable for the risk [4.1] Category of system [4.3] & [Table 1]
If the risk is not listed or the building is more than 45m height then the AHJ(s) should be consulted we may need a BS EN 12845 system?
DO we have ‘compensatory’ features [4.4] DO we have ‘special circumstances’ [4.5] DO we have ‘venerable people’ [3.31] & [4.5] Do we have a ‘fire strategy or risk assessment’ [5.4] &
[Table 1]
Canute LLP
10
http://www.canutesoft.com
Special circumstances
Extend duration of water supply
More robust water supply Redundancy Fire service infill
Increasing Design Density and/or Increase Area of operation
In some circumstances, enhanced performance, reliability and resiliencearrangements should be provided, if an assessment shows them to be necessary.Where appropriate, the designer should consult the relevant AHJ(s).
High fire loadings Older buildings Atria Fire engineered solutions Mixed use buildings Secure accommodation Vulnerable people
Canute LLP
11
http://www.canutesoft.com
Vulnerable people
“people who are at greater risk from fire because they are unable to easily evacuate without assistance, or who have a higher than average likelihood ofexperiencing a fire, or a combination of the two”
BS 9251:2014 [3.31]
The BS 9251 tells us in Annex B, in some detail what it considers as vulnerable people and what addition measures may be required.
Canute LLP
12
http://www.canutesoft.com
Compensatory feature
Older buildings New buildings which cannot meet
the necessary requirements for fire appliances
Loft conversions – adequate means of escape
“There are occasions when a suppression system is used as a means of demonstrating compliance with building regulations or to compensate for, or overcome, circumstances where a building is unable to achieve compliance with guidance issued in support of building regulations.”
BS 9251 : 2014 [4.4]
Consultation with AHJ’s Agree the Category of system &
design density May need a fire risk strategy Consider Special circumstances [4.5] Recorded agreed measures on the
compliance certificate
Canute LLP
13
http://www.canutesoft.com
Category of system
Type 3
Type 2
We can determine the category form Table 1, if the occupancy is listed and the building is less than 45m
If it not then the AHJ(s) must be consulted to agree which category is applicable (if any), if ‘additional measures’ are required or if a BS EN 12845 system is more appropriate.
Canute LLP
14
http://www.canutesoft.com
Category of systems – Table 1Category
Description
1 Single family dwellings such as: A)
• Individual dwelling house• Individual flat or maisonette• Transportable home
House of multiple occupation (HMOs) A) B)
Bed and breakfast accommodation A) B)
Boarding housesBlock of flats < 18m in height A) C)
2 Block of flats > 18m in height D)
Small care homes E)
3 Care homesNursing homesResidential rehabilitation accommodationDormitoriesHostels
You need to check the footnotes. They can change the category
Canute LLP
15
http://www.canutesoft.com
Category of system : Type 1and modifiers
Single family dwelling Type ?Vulnerable
people
Special circumstances
Risk assessment
HMOs
Bed & breakfast
Boarding houses
Vulnerablepeople
More than 2 floors or
more thanfive lettable
rooms
Type 2
Type ?
Which ever is the highest
Canute LLP
16
http://www.canutesoft.com
Category of system : Type 1and modifiers
Type ?
Blocks of flats < 18m
Vulnerablepeople
Communal roomsor corridors
require protection Type 3
Total floor area is less
than 2400m2
Special circumstances
Risk assessment
Which ever is the highest
Canute LLP
17
http://www.canutesoft.com
Category of system : Type 2and modifiers
Type 3Block of flats > 18mCommunal rooms
or corridorsrequire protection
Small residential care homes
More than 10 residents Type 3
Sheltered and extra care housing
Communal roomsor corridors
require protection Type 3
>18m & < 45m in height
Canute LLP
18
http://www.canutesoft.com
Category of system : Type 3
Dormitories
Residential care homes(more than10 residents)
Hostels
If the risk is outside that listed in Table 1 then you may need to look at an enhanced systems ‘Special Circumstances’ or BS EN 12845 may be more appropriate.
Canute LLP
19
http://www.canutesoft.com
Minimum design parameters - Table 2
Category of System
Min design density mm/min
No of sprinklers Min duration of supplyminutes
1 2.04 A) 1 or 2 102 2.80 B) 1 or 2 303 2.80 C) 2 or 4 D) 30
Again we have a lot of footnotes to read and understand.
Table 2 gives the minimum design parameters and can by modified if the system is installed for ‘compensatory features’, ‘special circumstance’ or ‘fire strategy / risk assessment’.
Canute LLP
20
http://www.canutesoft.com
The footnotesA) Where a sprinkler system is installed as a compensatory feature (see 4.4), the minimum design discharge densityshould be increased to either:
a) 2.80 mm/min for a single head operation, or 2.04 mm/min through each sprinkler operating simultaneously
up to a maximum of two sprinklers in a single area of operation; orb) 4 mm/min for single head operation, or 2.80 mm/min through each sprinkler operating
simultaneously up toa maximum of two sprinklers in a single area of operation.
The increased level of discharge density needed [a) or b) above] should be agreed with the AHJ prior toinstallation, based on the risk identified.B) Where a sprinkler system is installed as a compensatory feature (see 4.4), the minimum design discharge densityshould be increased to 4 mm/min for single head operation, or 2.8 mm/min through each sprinkler operatingsimultaneously up to a maximum of two sprinklers in a single area of operation.C) Where a sprinkler system is installed as a compensatory feature (see 4.4), the minimum design discharge densityshould be increased to 4 mm/min for single head operation, or 2.8 mm/min through each sprinkler operatingsimultaneously up to a maximum of four sprinklers in a single area of operation.D) Where communal areas/corridors are managed areas and considered to be sterile within a fire strategy report orwith agreement by the AHJ, the number of design sprinklers may be limited to two in these areas only.
Canute LLP
21
http://www.canutesoft.com
Footnote A – Type 1 category
A) Where a sprinkler system is installed as a compensatory feature (see 4.4), the minimum design discharge densityshould be increased to either:
a) 2.80 mm/min for a single head operation, or 2.04 mm/min through each sprinkler operating simultaneouslyup to a maximum of two sprinklers in a single area of operation; orb) 4 mm/min for single head operation, or 2.80 mm/min through each sprinkler operating simultaneously up toa maximum of two sprinklers in a single area of operation.
The increased level of discharge density needed [a) or b) above] should be agreed with the AHJ prior toinstallation, based on the risk identified.
Footnote A gives is applicable to Type 1 system when the systems is installed for compensatory features and gives you a choice of a) or b) but it must be agreed with the AHJ.
Canute LLP
22
http://www.canutesoft.com
Footnote B & C – Type 2 & 3 category
B) Where a sprinkler system is installed as a compensatory feature (see 4.4), the minimum design discharge density should be increased to 4 mm/min for single head operation, or 2.8 mm/min through each sprinkler operating simultaneously up to a maximum of two sprinklers in a single area of operation.C) Where a sprinkler system is installed as a compensatory feature (see 4.4), the minimum design discharge density should be increased to 4 mm/min for single head operation, or 2.8 mm/min through each sprinkler operating simultaneously up to a maximum of four sprinklers in a single area of operation.
Footnote B & C is applicable to Type 2 & 3 system when the systems is installed for compensatory features, it looks complicated but its not. The only difference is that you need a minimum of 4 mm/min from the most remote sprinkler head and 2.8 mm/min from the sprinkler in your area of operation
You will need two sets of calculations to prove this.
Canute LLP
23
http://www.canutesoft.com
Footnote B & C – Type 2 & 3 categoryFootnote B & C is applicable to Type 2 & 3 system when the systems is installed for compensatory features, it looks complicated but its not. The only difference is that you need a minimum of 4 mm/min from the most remote sprinkler head and 2.8 mm/min from the sprinkler in your area of operation
You will need two sets of calculations to prove this.
MRH
Based on a Type 3 systems we would need to prove what we can get 4 mm/min from the MRH and 2.8 mm/min from all 4 heads.
Canute LLP
24
http://www.canutesoft.com
Footnote D – Type 3 category
D) Where communal areas/corridors are managed areas and considered to be sterile within a fire strategy report or with agreement by the AHJ, the number of design sprinklers may be limited to two in these areas only.
Footnote D tells us that if areas such as corridors which are consider as sterile in the fire strategy and with agreement with the AHJ can have the number of sprinkler in operation reduced to two.
This could reduce the total water demand for the systems and therefore you may have a smaller water supply.
Canute LLP
25
http://www.canutesoft.com
Sprinkler head coverage
Maximum sprinkler coverage 25m2
Maximum spacing between heads 5.5m or 1/2 a design spacing from any wall or partition
Minimum distance between sprinkler should be 2.4m Only sprinklers heads in accordance with BS 9252
should be used unless agreed with the AHJ
Canute LLP
26
http://www.canutesoft.com
Sprinkler heads and flow rate
Minimum head pressure of 0.5 bar Minimum k-factor of 40 lpm/min/bar0.5 (mm/min)
The minimum k-factor will precluded the standard been used for water mist systems
Canute LLP
27
http://www.canutesoft.com
Extent of sprinkler protection
Bathrooms < 5 m2
Cupboards with floor area < 2 m2
Attach buildings and crawl spaces
Sprinkler protection should be provided in all parts of the premises. However,unless required by a fire strategy or risk assessment, the following may beexcluded:
Uninhabited loft/roof voids
Canute LLP
28
http://www.canutesoft.com
Compartments5.5 m
3.6
m
A compartment is an area enclosed by walls and a ceiling, where any openings are not more than 2500 mm in width and either:
A. A lintel depth of not less than 200mm or
B. A single opening of not more than 900 mm in width without a lintel
Compartments are important as it will determine the number of heads in operation, the required flow and pressure for the systems and the tank size.
Canute LLP
29
http://www.canutesoft.com
CompartmentsAs this opening is wider than 2.5 m in width we will need to take the sprinkler is then staircase in to consideration.
So we have the kitchen, dining room and the staircase as one compartment.
But the maximum number of sprinkler s in operation is limited to:
2 for Type 1 & 2 or4 for Type 3
Canute LLP
30
http://www.canutesoft.com
Compartments
3.0 m
3.6
m
This area is divided by a wall with a opening 2.0 m wide which has a lintel 200 mm in depth.
2.5 m
2.0
m Therefore the two rooms can be considered as separate compartments.
Sprinkler A and B can be considered to be in separate compartments and calculated separately
Canute LLP
31
http://www.canutesoft.com
Compartments
3.0 m
3.6
m
This area is divided by a wall with a opening 1.5 m wide with no lintel.
2.5 m
1.5
m Therefore the two rooms must be considered as the one compartments.
We will need to calculate sprinkler A and B as both are in the area of operation.
Canute LLP
32
http://www.canutesoft.com
Canute LLPHelp to make the would a better place