final report toronto ten year cycling network implementation plan · 2019-01-23 · final report...
TRANSCRIPT
FINAL REPORT
Toronto Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation PlanConnect, Grow, Renew
Submitted to City of Torontoby IBI Group Professional Services (Canada) Inc.in association with Vélo Québec
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETOWRK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
i
Table of Contents
Glossary of Terms .....................................................................................................ix
Executive Summary.............................................................................................. ES-1
1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Objectives of the Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan ............. 1
1.2 Background ........................................................................................... 2
1.3 The Need for a New Implementation Plan ................................................ 2
1.4 Cycling Network Investment Benefits ....................................................... 3
1.4.1 Toronto’s Growth since 2001 ...................................................... 3
1.4.2 Updating Standards for Cycling Facility Designs........................... 3
1.4.3 Safety........................................................................................ 4
1.4.4 Health Benefits .......................................................................... 4
1.4.5 Social Benefits ........................................................................... 5
1.4.6 Environmental Benefits ............................................................... 6
1.4.7 Economic Benefits ..................................................................... 6
2 Background & Related Studies ........................................................................ 8
2.1 Toronto Bike Plan................................................................................... 8
2.2 Bikeway Network – 2011 Update............................................................. 8
2.3 Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan ........................................................ 8
2.4 Official Plan Draft Cycling Policy Framework ...........................................10
2.5 Toronto Road Safety Plan......................................................................10
2.6 Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines .....................................................11
3 Study Process.................................................................................................12
4 Cycling Network Critical Review .....................................................................15
5 Mapping the Potential to Impact Cycling in Toronto .......................................16
5.1 Current Demand ...................................................................................16
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
Table of Contents (continued)
April 17, 2017 ii
5.2 Potential Demand..................................................................................16
5.3 Population and Employment Density ......................................................17
5.4 Coverage..............................................................................................17
5.5 Barriers ................................................................................................17
5.6 Safety...................................................................................................17
5.7 Trip Generators.....................................................................................18
5.8 Connectivity ..........................................................................................18
5.9 Higher-priority Transit Stations ...............................................................28
6 Consultation ...................................................................................................30
6.1 Consultation Overview...........................................................................30
6.2 Internal Consultation .............................................................................31
6.3 Consultation Promotions........................................................................31
6.4 Pre-consultation Workshop Event...........................................................31
6.5 Phase 1 Consultation: Establishing Network Planning Priorities................32
6.5.1 Respondent Distribution ............................................................33
6.5.2 Respondent Demographics........................................................34
6.5.3 Preferred Facility Types .............................................................35
6.5.4 Network Planning Priorities ........................................................36
6.5.5 Current Demand Versus Future Growth .....................................38
6.5.6 New Routes Versus Improve Existing Routes..............................39
6.5.7 Connecting Existing Routes Versus Connecting to Destinations ...40
6.5.8 Commuter Focus Versus Recreational Focus..............................41
6.5.9 Budget .....................................................................................42
6.5.10 Findings from Phase I Consultation ............................................42
6.6 Phase 2 Consultations: Cycling Network Implementation Plan Draft Map ..42
6.6.1 Phase 2 Workshops with Cycle Toronto......................................43
6.6.2 City of Toronto Cycling App .......................................................43
6.6.3 MetroQuest Digital Draft Map .....................................................46
6.6.4 Public Drop-in Events and Rides ................................................58
6.7 Feedback on Cycling Facility Design Options ..........................................60
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
Table of Contents (continued)
April 17, 2017 iii
7 Cycling Projects Priority Analysis ..................................................................63
7.1 Feasibility Analysis ................................................................................63
7.1.1 Identifying Suitable Cycling Facility Types ...................................63
7.2 Implementation Strategies .....................................................................73
7.2.1 Major Capital Infrastructure Co-ordination Opportunities ..............74
7.3 Cycling Impact Analysis Weighting .........................................................76
7.4 Phase 2 Survey Preferences..................................................................78
7.5 Cycling Project Costs ............................................................................78
7.6 Bringing it All Together: Cycling Project Priority Ranking ..........................78
8 Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan Capital Scenarios ................80
8.1 Funding Levels .....................................................................................80
8.2 Balancing Delivery of Annual Program....................................................81
8.3 Ten Year Implementation Plan Scenarios ...............................................81
9 Cycling Network "Renew" Program ................................................................83
9.1.1 Renewing Quiet Street Cycling Routes .......................................84
9.1.2 Renewing Cycling Facilities on Fast Busy Streets........................85
10 Recommended Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan ....................86
10.1 Integration of 2012 Trail Plan Recommendations.....................................88
10.2 Implementation Plan Approval Process...................................................88
10.3 Exploring the Impacts of the Recommended Network ..............................88
10.3.1 Summary of Recommended Network by District ..........................89
10.3.2 Improving Access to Transit .......................................................91
10.3.3 Crossing Barriers ......................................................................93
10.4 Streets Not Identified as Cycling Network Routes ....................................96
10.4.1 Bicycle Friendly Streets .............................................................96
10.4.2 Complete Streets Guidelines......................................................97
10.4.3 Streets Identified in Future Studies .............................................97
10.4.4 Revisions and Updates to the MCIC Projects ..............................97
11 Implementation ...............................................................................................98
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
Table of Contents (continued)
April 17, 2017 iv
11.1 Staff to Deliver Infrastructure Projects.....................................................98
11.2 Cycling Projects and Other Agencies ......................................................98
11.3 Resources for Cycling Network Maintenance ..........................................99
12 Setting and Tracking Objectives ................................................................... 101
12.1 Tracking Infrastructure Delivery ............................................................ 101
12.2 Evaluating the Impact of the Cycling Network........................................ 102
12.2.1 Evaluating Proposed Network Routes....................................... 102
12.2.2 Evaluating Proposed Major Corridor Studies ............................. 103
13 Conclusions .................................................................................................. 104
Appendix A – Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan Maps (City-Wide, District and Ward) ......................................................................................... A-1
Appendix B – Cycling Impact Analysis................................................................... B-1
Appendix C – Unit Costs of Construction............................................................... C-1
Appendix D – Project Priority Ratings .................................................................... D-1
Appendix E – Cycling Network Outcomes for Various Implementation Plan Scenarios ...................................................................................................... E-1
Appendix F – Studies Led by Others ...................................................................... F-1
References ............................................................................................................. R-1
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
Table of Contents (continued)
April 17, 2017 v
List of Exhibits
Exhibit 1-1: Cycling on College Street West .................................................................. 3
Exhibit 1-2: The Appetite is Growing for Infrastructure Designs that Support a Wider Range of Cycling Ages and Abilities ............................................................. 4
Exhibit 1-3: Cycling Facilities Help to Create Vibrant Destination Areas........................... 5
Exhibit 1-4: Toronto's Greenhouse Gas Emissions & Targets ......................................... 6
Exhibit 2-1: Bikeway Trails Plan Approved by Council June 6, 2012................................ 9
Exhibit 3-1: Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan Study Process ...................14
Exhibit 5-1: Current Cycling Demand ...........................................................................19
Exhibit 5-2: Potential Cycling Demand .........................................................................20
Exhibit 5-3: Population and Employment Density ..........................................................21
Exhibit 5-4: Coverage of Existing Cycling Network ........................................................22
Exhibit 5-5: Barriers: Freeways, Railways, Rivers and Ravines ......................................23
Exhibit 5-6: Vehicle-Bicycle Collisions: Area 1 ..............................................................24
Exhibit 5-7: Vehicle-Bicycle Collisions: Area 2 ..............................................................25
Exhibit 5-8: Trip Generators ........................................................................................26
Exhibit 5-9: Cycling Network Connectivity ....................................................................27
Exhibit 5-10: Higher-priority Transit Stations in Area 2 Identified as Bicycle Trip Generators ................................................................................................29
Exhibit 6-1: Public Consultation Process to Develop the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan 30
Exhibit 6-2: Sample Targeted Ad for the Phase 1 Survey ..............................................32
Exhibit 6-3: Location (First Three Digits of Home Postal Code) of Respondents to Phase 1 Survey: Network Planning Priorities ............................................................33
Exhibit 6-4: Map Phase 1 Survey Respondents ............................................................34
Exhibit 6-5: Survey Results for Type of Cycling Facility the City Should Focus On (Respondents Distributed 20 Points Among the Four Types) ........................35
Exhibit 6-6: Survey Results for How Cycling Projects Should be Evaluated (Respondents Chose Top Three Priorities out of Eight Criteria) ..........................................36
Exhibit 6-7: Survey Results for Overall Objectives for the Cycling Network (Respondents Chose First and Second Priorities Out of Three Objectives) ..........................37
Exhibit 6-8: Phase 1 Survey – Current Demand vs. Encourage Future Growth ...............38
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
Table of Contents (continued)
April 17, 2017 vi
Exhibit 6-9: Phase 1 Survey Map – Emphasis on Future Growth vs. Meeting Current Demand ....................................................................................................38
Exhibit 6-10: Phase 1 Survey – New Routes vs. Route Improvements / Renewal............39
Exhibit 6-11: Phase 1 Survey Map – New Routes vs. Route Improvements / Renewal ....39
Exhibit 6-12: Phase 1 Survey – Emphasize Connecting Existing Routes vs. Emphasize Connecting to Destinations .........................................................................40
Exhibit 6-13: Phase 1 Survey Map – Emphasize Connecting Existing Routes vs. Emphasize Connecting to Destinations .......................................................40
Exhibit 6-14: Phase 1 Survey - Emphasize Commuter Focus vs. Emphasize Recreational Focus........................................................................................................41
Exhibit 6-15: Phase 1 Survey Map – Emphasize Commuter Focus vs. Emphasize Recreational Focus ....................................................................................41
Exhibit 6-16: Phase 1 Results for Cycling Network Budget Change................................42
Exhibit 6-17: Toronto Cycling App 2015 Heat Map ........................................................44
Exhibit 6-18: Toronto Cycling App Trips Logged in 2015 ...............................................45
Exhibit 6-19: Sample Screens from MetroQuest Online Mapping Tool ............................46
Exhibit 6-20: Phase 2 MetroQuest Digital Draft Map Respondents .................................47
Exhibit 6-21: MetroQuest Online Survey Map – Area 1..................................................49
Exhibit 6-22: MetroQuest Online Survey Map – Area 2..................................................50
Exhibit 6-23: Phase 2 MetroQuest Digital Map Sample Screenshot to Select Priority Projects.....................................................................................................51
Exhibit 6-24: A Section of College Street West that is Wide Enough to Accommodate Street Car Lanes, Two Travel Lanes, a Bike Lane and On-Street Parking......52
Exhibit 6-25: MetroQuest Origin-Destination Desire Lines Map: Toronto and East York District ......................................................................................................54
Exhibit 6-26: MetroQuest Origin-Destination Desire Lines Map: Scarborough District ......55
Exhibit 6-27: MetroQuest Origin-Destination Desire Line Map: North York District...........56
Exhibit 6-28: MetroQuest Origin-Destination Desire Line Map: Etobicoke-York District ....57
Exhibit 6-29: Phase 2 MetroQuest Digital Draft Map Age of Respondents ......................58
Exhibit 6-30: Phase 2 MetroQuest Digital Draft Map Gender of Respondents .................58
Exhibit 6-31: Phase 2 MetroQuest Digital Draft Map Respondents Frequency of Cycling.58
Exhibit 6-32: Phase 2 MetroQuest Digital Draft Map Respondent Affiliations ..................58
Exhibit 6-33: Public Drop-in Events to review the Draft Cycling Network and Priorities ....59
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
Table of Contents (continued)
April 17, 2017 vii
Exhibit 6-34: Public Drop-in Event on the Waterfront Trail .............................................59
Exhibit 6-35: Cycling with Gateway Public School Students and Parents in Partnership with Green Communities Canada................................................................59
Exhibit 6-36: MetroQuest Survey Question – Comfort Cycling on Toronto Streets ...........60
Exhibit 6-37: MetroQuest Survey Question – Prioritizing On-street Parking or Separators.................................................................................................60
Exhibit 6-38: MetroQuest Survey Question – Separation for Pilot Projects ......................61
Exhibit 6-39: MetroQuest Survey Question – Separation for Cycle Tracks ......................61
Exhibit 6-40: MetroQuest Survey Question – Options for Cyclists' Left-turns..................62
Exhibit 6-41: MetroQuest Survey Question – Accessible Bus Stop Design .....................62
Exhibit 7-1: Street Types for Proposed Cycling Network ................................................64
Exhibit 7-2: OTM Book 18: Cycling Facilities Pre-Selection Nomograph .........................65
Exhibit 7-3: Planters Used as Separators for the Richmond Street Cycle Track ..............66
Exhibit 7-4: Fast Busy Street Speed and Volume Thresholds for Dedicated and Separated Cycling Facilities ........................................................................................66
Exhibit 7-5: Types of Cycling Facilities Suitable for Fast Busy Streets ............................67
Exhibit 7-6: Example of a Contra-flow Bike Lane on a Local Street ................................68
Exhibit 7-7: Range of Design Features for Quiet Streets................................................69
Exhibit 7-8: Physical Traffic Diversion Measures...........................................................70
Exhibit 7-9: Quiet Street Speed and Volume Thresholds for Shared Cycling Facilities .....71
Exhibit 7-10: Major Corridor Studies ............................................................................72
Exhibit 7-11: Implementation Strategies for Each Type of Cycling Facility.......................73
Exhibit 7-12: Reallocation of Lane Lines to Install Painted Cycling Facilities May be Undertaken in Co-Ordination with Road Resurfacings ..................................76
Exhibit 7-13: Eight Criteria used in the Analysis of Cycling Impact Undertaken for Each Planned Cycling Facility .............................................................................77
Exhibit 7-14: Illustrating the Combining of Feasibility, Analysis and Consultation Scores .79
Exhibit 9-1: Example of Green Pavement Markings Installed at Sherbourne Street and Wellesley Street East .................................................................................83
Exhibit 9-2: Examples of City of Toronto’s New Wayfinding Signs ..................................85
Exhibit 10-1: Map of Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan Recommended Routes ......................................................................................................87
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
Table of Contents (continued)
April 17, 2017 viii
Exhibit 10-2: Summary Table – Centreline Kilometres of Existing and Recommended Network for Scenario 3 (Uplift to $16M Annual Budget) ................................90
Exhibit 10-3: Scenario 3 Recommended Infrastructure - Centreline Kilometres by District ......................................................................................................91
Exhibit 10-4: Existing Cycling Network and Transit Stations...........................................91
Exhibit 10-5: Transit Integration with the Existing Cycling Network .................................92
Exhibit 10-6: Ten Year Cycling Network and Barrier Crossings ......................................94
Exhibit 10-7: Proposed Cycling Network Projects that Cross Barriers .............................95
Exhibit 10-8: Proposed Cycling Network Projects that May Require a Grade Separation to Cross a Barrier ..........................................................................................96
Exhibit 10-9: Summary of Barrier Crossings .................................................................96
Exhibit 11-1: Recommended Staffing Increases Corresponding to Capital Funding Increases ..................................................................................................98
Exhibit 11-2: Winter and Summer Maintenance of Cycle Tracks .................................. 100
Exhibit 12-1: Wellesley Street Cycle Track ................................................................. 101
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2017 ix
Glossary of Terms Area 1 For the purpose of this study, the city was divided into two context
areas, recognizing that levels of cycling activity and demand differ in each. Area 1 consists of the more compact central area of the city, where there is further evolution of a maturing cycling network and culture. There are opportunities to "connect" and "renew" the network by completing missing links and improving the quality of cycling routes. See also Area 2.
This area is shown on the maps illustrating the potential cycling impact analysis in Section 5. The boundary between the two areas is intended to provide guidance only in the application of some of the cycling impact criteria.
Area 2 For the purpose of this study, the city was divided into two context areas, recognizing that levels of cycling activity and demand differ in each. Area 2 consists of the more suburban built environment surrounding the central area (Area 1). The existing cycling network is less extensive, with more opportunities to “grow” into new parts of the city not served by the network. See also Area 1
This area is shown on the maps illustrating the potential cycling impact analysis in Section 5. The boundary between the two areas is intended to provide guidance only in the application of some of the cycling impact criteria.
Bicycle Boulevard A cycling route along connected, Quiet Streets (see below) with traffic calming, wayfinding signage and “sharrow” pavement markings that make it comfortable and efficient for cyclists to use these streets. Sometimes they are referred to as neighbourhood greenways.
Bike Plan The City of Toronto Bike Plan was adopted by City Council in 2001. This overarching policy document included a variety of cycling-related recommendations, including guiding principles and objectives for the design of Toronto’s Cycling Network.
This Ten Year Implementation Plan report supersedes Bike Plan Recommendations 5-4, 10-2 and Appendix C, as it provides updated information surrounding the resourcing required for the delivery of Cycling Network Infrastructure in the City of Toronto.
Bikeway Trails Plan The City of Toronto Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan, adopted by City Council in 2012. The Trails Plan sets out the vision for where and how Toronto will build trails until 2021.
Centreline Kilometres The length of a facility, i.e. road, bikeway, sidewalk, etc., measured along the centreline, or along the middle, of the road. For bike lanes, typically the lane kilometres measured along the length of each bike lane are twice as long as the centreline kilometres. Centreline kilometres are typically used to provide an overall measure of how much of the roadway network has facilities.
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2017 x
Contraflow Bicycle Lane Contraflow bicycle lanes allow cyclists to travel in two directions on a street that is one-way for all other vehicles. Cyclists travel in the designated contraflow bicycle lane in the opposing direction from the one-way direction of all other vehicles. Cyclists traveling in the one-way direction with all other vehicles typically ride in a mixed-use traffic lane or in a marked bicycle lane in that direction.
Bicycle symbols and diamonds are used to mark the lane. The diamond symbol is the symbol for a “reserved” lane. The “contra flow” bicycle lane will also have arrows painted in the lane, communicating that the bicycle lane is to be used in only one direction.
Cycling Impact Analysis Measures applied to prospective City of Toronto Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan Projects, to evaluate their benefit to the overall design of Toronto’s network.
Cycling Network Plan The collection of on-street and off-street cycling routes that form a network. It is used as a policy design tool that stipulates locations and standards where the inclusion of cycling infrastructure as an integrated component of the broader road transportation system must be accommodated. Appendix E includes maps of the existing and proposed Cycling Network for the city of Toronto.
Cycling Network Facility Infrastructure that facilitates cycling. Standards for Cycling Network facilities are described at a high level in this report, and in detail by the City of Toronto’s Bikeway Design Guidelines.
Cycling Network Route May refer to both dedicated and non-dedicated cycling routes which make up the City of Toronto’s Cycling Network, but must adhere to minimum standards for cycling network facility design.
Cycling Unit Refers to the group of staff from Cycling Infrastructure and Programs that deliver the Cycling Network Infrastructure, within the City of Toronto’s Transportation Services Division.
Fast Busy Street A street with a lot of motor vehicles and traffic is moving quickly; this makes most cyclists feel unsafe. For these types of streets a dedicated cycling facility such as a bicycle lane, buffered bicycle lane or cycle track can help keep cyclist and motor vehicle traffic separate. See also Quiet Street below.
Implementation Scenarios 1 through 5
Refers to five (5) capital budget funding scenarios outlined in Appendix E of this report. The City of Toronto Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan analyzed the amount of linear infrastructure that would be delivered at each funding level.
Major Corridor Study Fast busy streets (see above), which support high levels of commercial activity or a very high number of motor vehicle trips, may require a deeper level of study, consultation and investment.
OP The City of Toronto Official Plan. The Official Plan sets out the vision for where and how Toronto will grow to the year 2031.
Quiet Street A street that is quiet and has slow-moving motor vehicle traffic; there is no need to make a dedicated cycling facility. Traffic calming, wayfinding signage and “sharrow” pavement markings can help build bicycle boulevards that are comfortable for every type of cyclist. See also Fast Busy Streets above.
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2017 xi
Ten Year Plan The City of Toronto Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan will serve as a comprehensive roadmap and work plan, outlining the investments planned by the City of Toronto's Cycling Unit over 2016-2025
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2017 ES-1
Executive Summary The Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan will serve as a comprehensive roadmap and work plan, outlining the investments planned by the City of Toronto's Cycling Unit over 2016-2025. This report provides an overview of the process undertaken to develop the Ten Year Implementation Plan and describes the five implementation scenarios brought to City Council for consideration in the 2017 Capital Budget process. Scenario 3, as detailed in this report, is the staff recommended implementation scenario.
The Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan will build on the city's existing network of cycling routes by identifying potential Cycling Network projects to fulfill the project mandate to:
Connect the gaps in our existing Cycling Network;
Grow the Cycling Network into new parts of the city; and,
Renew the existing Cycling Network routes, to improve their quality.
Since November 2014, a significant amount of analysis and consultation was undertaken to inform the recommendations in this report. Extensive field work to inform new route feasibility was undertaken to identify and assess each of the routes proposed in the Plan.
The proposed Ten Year Plan identifies approximately 550 centreline kilometers (km) of new infrastructure (if counted in each lane direction, this proposed network constitutes more than 1000 lane km). This proposed new network includes:
280 centreline km of bicycle lanes or cycle tracks on Fast Busy Streets;
55 centreline km of sidewalk-level boulevard trails along Fast Busy Streets; and,
190 centreline km of cycling routes along Quiet Streets.
Included within this proposed network was approximately 100 centreline km along eight arterial roadways (split into seventeen segments) for which Major Corridor Studies would be undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of bicycle lanes or cycle tracks.
The deliverables recommended by Transportation Services in this report represent the outcome of Cycling Impact Analysis, feasibility analysis, capital works coordination and consultation.
A number of the significant trail projects were included in the 2012 Trails Plan and are therefore already approved. The recommended network in the Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan has been designed to include these approved trails as well as routes that are part of approved LRT projects. This implementation plan also recognizes numerous studies being undertaken by other divisions or agencies, which may afford opportunities for additional routes to be added to the network.
As per Council approval, Transportation Services will have the authority to initiate the studies, detailed design and public consultation required to deliver the cycling infrastructure projects contained in the Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan. During project implementation, Transportation Services will work with local area councillors and stakeholders, i.e. TTC, Metrolinx, utilities, etc., and undertake public consultation as part of the preliminary design process.
The intention of this plan is not to preclude opportunities for cycling projects, which may be supplemental to the proposed network. The purpose of this report, and its recommendations, is to ensure that within a coordinated capital program, the necessary resourcing is available to install and study cycling infrastructure annually. All projects have undergone a feasibility assessment to ensure a sound business case for their inclusion within Toronto’s Cycling Network. Each program scenario has been designed to ensure the targets match stable capital funding and staff resourcing required to deliver the recommended projects.
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2016 1
1 Introduction 1.1 Objectives of the Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation
Plan Connect – Grow – Renew: Building Toronto’s Cycling Network over the Next Ten Years The objectives of the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan are:
Connect the gaps in our existingCycling Network;
Grow the Cycling Network into newparts of the city; and,
Renew the existing Cycling Networkroutes, where there are opportunities toimprove their quality.
The routes recommended in the Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan have been designed to enhance the existing network in Toronto's central area. The projects recommended will connect network gaps by adding new routes and will renew existing routes to improve their quality. Routes that would grow the cycling network into neighbourhoods outside the city centre considered network recommendations from the 2001 Bike Plan and took a fresh look at new options. For these more suburban areas, infrastructure designs that provide more physical separation from motor vehicle traffic may be more desirable to increase cyclists’ comfort. It is anticipated that recommendations for boulevard trails may help to ensure the Cycling Network routes identified would provide a comfortable cycling environment for a wide range of people.
The Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan will recommend the type of cycling route appropriate for each project based on the street and land-use characteristics, including how busy the street is, how fast the traffic is moving and the space available within the roadway and boulevard. The appropriate type of Cycling Network facilities are described at a high level in this report; design guidance will be provided by the City of Toronto’s Bikeway Design Guidelines.
The Ten Year Plan will identify cycling network projects to be constructed by Transportation Services’ Cycling Unit starting in 2016 for the next 1-5 years and 6-10 years and the annual capital funding requirements to implement the plan. The recommendations in this implementation plan will help to ensure adequate, stable funding for Transportation Services' cycling program.
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2016 2
1.2 Background Bike lanes, cycle tracks, multi-use trails, and bicycle boulevards all link together to help build a connected Cycling Network. The Toronto Cycling Network Implementation Plan was designed to build on Toronto’s existing Cycling Network, which in 2015 included approximately 6 centreline km of cycle tracks, 107 centreline km of painted bicycle lanes, 148 centreline km of signed shared roadway routes and 294 centreline km of multi-use trails.
1.3 The Need for a New Implementation Plan In August 2001 Toronto’s City Council approved the 2001 Bike Plan. This ambitious policy document included 42 recommendations which have provided direction in 6 areas; Bike Parking Infrastructure, Cycling and Transit Programs, Safety and Education Programs, Promotion Activities, Standards for Bicycle Friendly Streets and the Direction to develop a Cycling Network.
This Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan revisits the routes identified as well as the cycling route designs used in recommendation 5.1 of the 2001 Toronto Bike Plan. An updated Cycling Network Implementation Plan is needed because:
• In the downtown core, most of the Cycling Network routes recommended in 2001 have now been installed;
• Ridership has grown and additional cycling routes are needed to serve the high demand in Toronto’s downtown core;
• New types of cycling infrastructure designs means that the roads which may best serve the cycling network have changed. New infrastructure options will allow for different streets to be evaluated in both the downtown core and the city’s suburban neighbourhoods;
• Our transportation infrastructure is aging, and many of our assets require significant rehabilitation. Bundling cycling infrastructure into the delivery of major capital road resurfacing or reconstruction projects will realize cost savings to build the cycling facilities;
• Congestion on our roads and expressways costs Toronto commuters an estimated $1.4 billion annuallyi;
• Cycling fosters health benefits, as a form of chronic disease prevention. In the city of Toronto, the total savings from these prevented deaths range from $130 million to $478 million annually (depending on how deaths are valued)ii;
• The cost to travel by bicycle is far lower than travelling by automobile. Infrastructure which supports financially affordable travel options contributes to poverty reduction and social benefits;
• Supporting cycling presents important environmental benefits, as motor vehicles continue to account for approximately one-third of greenhouse gas emissions from the cityiii. Facilities which make cycling safe and practical will enable more people to leave their cars at home; and,
• Travel by bicycle encourages shorter trips than auto travel which yields economic benefits for smaller community-based shops and businesses. For example, one case study in Toronto shows customers arriving by foot or on bike reported spending more than those arriving by car or transit. Those who lived nearby were 2.6 times more likely to spend more than $100 per month than those arriving from farther awayiv.
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2016 3
1.4 Cycling Network Investment Benefits
1.4.1 Toronto’s Growth since 2001 The city’s population is increasing by almost 40,000 people annually. 151 high-rise buildings were under construction in 2013. This increase in population density means more people may choose to cycle for short trips.
Over 143,000 new dwelling units were constructed in the city of Toronto between 2006 and 2016. 80% of these were mid to high-density developments, with buildings greater than 5 storeys. Increasingly, families with children are calling these buildings home. In 2011, 10,000 more families with children and youth lived in high-rise buildings than in 1996.vi.
As the city grows and changes, this presents an opportunity to improve how Toronto’s transportation systems operate. The City of Toronto’s Complete Streets Guidelinesvii will seek new and innovative ways to build public spaces which work for all modes of travel. And we can make on-the-ground changes – large and small, short-term and long-term – that will help Toronto’s transportation systems better meet the needs of all users.
The challenges related to aging infrastructure will be amplified over the next five years. The installation of cycling infrastructure may be a more affordable option, to update roads previously designed exclusively for motor vehicle travel.
A successful city requires a transportation system that is safe for people of all ages and abilities. Over the past ten years, Toronto’s streets have become safer for all road users. Total traffic -related fatalities have dropped by 41%, from an average of 74 per year from 1998 to 2002, to an average of 44 per year from 2008 to 2012. Pedestrian fatalities have dropped by 37% over the same period, from an average of 38 to an average of 24 per year. At the same time, the city’s population has increased.
While Toronto is outperforming many other North American cities, there is still room for improvement. In 2012, over 50,000 collisions were reported, resulting in 44 fatalities, and societal costs of almost $2 billion. Toronto is committed to enhancing transportation safety for all users.
Toronto’s Vision Zero Road Safety Planviii is a comprehensive five-year (2017-2021) action plan focused on reducing traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries on Toronto's streets. With over 50 safety measures across six areas of emphasis, the Plan prioritizes the safety of our most vulnerable road users. For additional information about the Road Safety Plan please see Section 2.5 of this report.
1.4.2 Updating Standards for Cycling Facility Designs The Cycling Network described in the 2001 Bike Plan included only painted bicycle lanes, signed shared roadways, and multi-use trails. Since the 2001 Bike Plan, there are new types of cycling facilities being implemented in Toronto:
Exhibit 1-1: Cycling on College Street Westv
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2016 4
In 2001 separated bike lanes (cycle tracks) were a type of cycling infrastructure thatwas not yet being widely implemented in North America. They are now beingconsidered and constructed in cities of all sizes on fast busy streets to improve thecomfort of cyclists and attract people who are uncomfortable riding in traffic tocycling;
Similarly, Toronto’s new cycling wayfinding standardsix will allow for signed, sharedroadway routes on Quiet Streets to be enhanced with the use of wayfinding signsand sharrow pavement markings. These enhance the cohesion and visibility of theQuiet Street network; and,
In 2001, multi-use trailopportunities were lookedat extensively in rail corridors, hydro corridors and other green spaces. Multi-use path connection opportunities in the boulevard were less widely explored as they are more costly to build than painted bicycle lanes. Today, there is greater appetite to invest in cycling facilities (multi-use trails or cycle tracks) located in the boulevards of fast busy streets as these facilities are more comfortable for cycling than painted bicycle lanes.
1.4.3 Safety Toronto's City-wide Cycling Study, conducted by Transportation Services in 2009, found that there is potential to move 44% of recreational cyclists to cycle for practical purposes by improving the safety of cycling in the city through creating more bike lanes, paths, and safer road conditions.
The provision of cycling infrastructure would support safety for both residents and non-residents.
1.4.4 Health Benefits Active transportation (walking and cycling) is a means to improve health and quality of life in Toronto. Some of the significant benefits, as outlined in Road to Health: Improving Walking and Cycling in Toronto (Toronto Public Health, April 2012) include the following:
• In the city of Toronto, traffic-related pollution was estimated to cause 440 premature deaths, 200,000 restricted activity person-days and 1,700 hospitalizations per year in 2007. Mortality costs alone were valued at $2.2 billion (Toronto Public Health 2007). Cycling is a form of active transportation, which does not contribute to traffic-related air pollution;
• In Toronto, over 40% of adults and 22% of adolescents are overweight or obese(Toronto Public Health 2010). Increasing the active transportation mode share could
Exhibit 1-2: The Appetite is Growing for Infrastructure Designs that Support a Wider Range of Cycling Ages and Abilities
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2016 5
help to improve physical fitness and reduce the proportion of Torontonians who are overweight or obese;
• Reductions in cardiovascular disease, diabetes, stroke and cancer are important for the city of Toronto, given the increasing rates of chronic disease. Rates of self-reported diabetes doubled from 4% to approximately 8% between 2001 and 2008 among Torontonians 12 and older, while high blood pressure increased from 12% to 15%. Circulatory diseases are responsible for more than 1 in 4 deaths in Toronto each year; breast and colorectal cancers alone are responsible for over 5% of deaths in Toronto (Statistics Canada 2011). Increasing the active transportation mode share could help to increase daily cardiovascular activity of Torontonians;
• Physical activity has a demonstrated positive effect on a range of mental illnesses. Physical activity has also been found to reduce the symptoms of depression, anxiety and panic disorders, with beneficial effect equal to meditation or relaxation (Paluska and Schwenk 2000); and,
• A Canadian study calculated that physical inactivity alone is directly associated with $1.6 billion in annual health care costs in Canada, or 1.5% of all Canadian health care costs (Katzmarzyk and Janssen 2004). Each additional 10% increase in physical activity in Canada would translate to annual direct health care savings of up to $150 million (Katzmarzyk et al. 2000).
1.4.5 Social Benefits In Toronto, only 66% of adults report a strong sense of belonging to their local community (Statistics Canada 2011). As stated in the Official Plan (City of Toronto 2010a), developing walkable and bikeable neighbourhoods and communities may help to fulfill Toronto’s vision of “creating an attractive and safe city that evokes pride, passion and a sense of belonging”.
While cycling is often identified for its environmental benefits, it should also be recognized as a financially sustainable type of transportation. When the built environment provides safe cycling infrastructure, cycling can serve as a mode of travel that costs individuals less than driving or taking public transit. Toronto's Poverty Reduction Strategy states that 46% of recent immigrants live in poverty, 37% of female lone parents live in poverty and 33% of people in racialized groups live in poverty. Recommendation 9.3 of Toronto’s Poverty Reduction Strategy suggests that Toronto will "Develop a capital and service planning approach that focuses on building infrastructure improvements faster and meeting the immediate needs of the inner suburbs."
On significant civic streets such as Queens Quay, the provision of cycling infrastructure is an important component when place-making vibrant social spaces. Supporting cycling offers
Exhibit 1-3: Cycling Facilities Help to Create Vibrant Destination Areasx
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2016 6
distinct opportunities to define streets as human-scale places, which attract cultural events and tourism.
1.4.6 Environmental Benefits Recognizing that climate change is one of the most important issues of our time, Toronto’s City Council unanimously adopted Toronto's Climate Change Action Plan in 2007xi. The plan set bold targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, and outlined actions for the City to create a sustainable energy future. Toronto's greenhouse gas reduction targets, based on 1990 levels of approximately 22 million tonnes per year, city-wide, are 30% by 2020 (6,600,000 tons per year) and 80% by 2050 (17,600,000 tons per year).
Exhibit 1-4: Toronto's Greenhouse Gas Emissions & Targets
Cycling uses minimal fossil fuels and is a pollution-free mode of transport. Bikes reduce the need to build, service and dispose of cars. Cycling 5 km each way to work would save 750 kgxii of greenhouse gas emissions each year. Cycling for short trips provides an alternative to motorized modes of transportation, which contribute to climate change. In addition, as cycling produces no emissions, it does not contribute to smog or noise pollution.
The City of Toronto’s Power to Live Green reportxiii identifies Toronto’s cycling infrastructure planning as a mechanism to realize the City’s greenhouse gas emissions targets.
1.4.7 Economic Benefits Toronto is a vibrant city of neighbourhoods. Toronto's neighbourhoods have been made possible in part by mixed use zoning policies instituted by Toronto's City Planning department in the 1980s and 1990s. Today, Toronto's Avenues support commercial activity, blended with nearby residential units. As a result many residents are within walking or biking distance from local shops and businesses. In contrast to many North American cities where residential units are located away from commercially zoned areas, the City of Toronto’s Avenues ensure origins and destinations are often a distance which can be cycled.
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2016 7
A number of studies have been undertaken by the Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (TCAT) and the University of Toronto. A study of the Danforth found that those who live or work in the area visited local shops more frequently than those who do not: 78% of those who live in the area visited more than five times per month whereas only 23% of those who do not live or work in the area will visit more than five times per month. Those who live or work in the Danforth area spend more money than those who do not: 62% of those who live in the area spend over $100 per month whereas only 10% of those who do not live or work in the area spend over $100 per month. Shorter trips can be taken efficiently on foot or by bicycle. These studies found that merchants tend to overestimate the number of people who drive to get to their businesses.
Surveys undertaken by TCAT on both Danforth Avenue and Bloor Street found that a majority of respondents preferred to see street use reallocated for streetscaping and safety projects such as widened sidewalks or a bike lane. Interestingly, even the majority of surveyed respondents who identified as drivers demonstrated support for streetscape changes.
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2016 8
2 Background & Related Studies The following studies provided background, related information, or recommendations which were incorporated into this Plan.
2.1 Toronto Bike Plan The Toronto Bike Planxiv was the first cycling master plan for the newly amalgamated City of Toronto adopted by Council, 2001. It recommends, among other things, a long-term, city-wide Bikeway Network consisting of bicycle lanes, signed routes and trails. The network objective was to create a grid of bikeways spaced approximately two kilometres apart so that all residents would be no more than one kilometre from a designated bikeway. Where bike lanes on arterial roads could not be accommodated due to impacts on motor vehicle parking or traffic, the grid gaps were filled with signed routes on parallel local roads.
2.2 Bikeway Network – 2011 Update This Transportation Services staff report adopted by Councilxv confirmed Council’s implementation priorities for 2010-2014 to accelerate the construction of the trails component of the network and upgrade and expand the downtown network of bike lanes by constructing cycle tracks.
2.3 Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan City Council, at its meeting of June 6, 2012, adopted the Bikeway Trails Implementation Planxvi. This Plan included 26 new trail projects totalling an additional 77 km of bikeway trails, as illustrated in Exhibit 2-1.
The majority of near-term (years 1-5) projects identified in the Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan have been initiated. A review of the projects identified for years 6-10 was undertaken by City of Toronto staff to evaluate the needs of the trails program, within the broader context of the Cycling Network Ten Year Implementation Plan.
CITY OFMISSISSAUGA
CITY OFBRAMPTON
CITY OFPICKERING
TOWN OFRICHMOND HILL CITY OF
MARKHAM
CITY OFVAUGHAN
VIC
TOR
IAPA
RK
AV
E
BAYVIE
W AV
E
BARTON AVE
A NTIB
ES
DR
GR
EEN
WO
OD
AVE
LAIR
D D
R
SPAD
INA AVE
MID
L AN
DAV
E
CO
NLIN
S RD
CAR
LAW AVE
DIXON RD
RO
YAL
YO
RK
RD
DUNDAS ST W OS
SIN
GTO
NAV
E
WO
OD
BINE
AVE
ADELAID E STE
YON
GE
ST
HU
NTSM
ILLB
L V D
MA
XO
ME
AVE
KEELE ST
RU
NN
YME
DE R
D
OS
L ER
ST
ROGERS RD
STEPH
EN
DR
VARNA
DR
PORT U
NIO
N R
D
STEELES AVE W
BIRC
HM
OU
NT R
D
RU
SS
ELL
HILL
RD
FUND
Y BAY
BL V D
ISABELLA
ST
THE
EA
ST
MA
LL
EGLINTON AVE E
CHE
RO
KEE
BLVD
YOR
K ST
KENN
ETH AVE
KINGSTON R
D
SHEPPARD AVE E
EASTERN AVE
CH
UR
CH
ST
EIREANN
QUAY
SCAR
LETTR
D
OVERLEA BLVD
MCNICOLL AVE
NA
NTU
CK
ET
BLVD
WELLINGTON ST W
HAVENDALE
RD
ST CLAIR AVE W
SHAW
ST
GILTS PU
R DR
TAPSC
OTT R
D
ALBION RD
FINCH AVE E
WE
ND
ELL AVE
ELLESMERE RD
FINCH AVE W
BELLAMY R
D N
KIP
L ING
AVE
KING
STON
RD
MA
RK
HA
MR
D
BR
IMLE
YR
D
ROYALCREST
RD
DO
RIS
AVE
LAKE SHORE BLVD W
HUNTINGWOOD DR
KING ST W
ELLESMERE RD
SENLAC
RD
LAKE SHORE BLVD W
LAWRENCE AVE E
JANE ST
CHAPLIN CRES
LAKE SHORE BLVD W
LAWRENCE AVE W
MC
CO
WA
NR
D
NASSAU
ST
GLENGROVE AVE W
ISLING
TON
AVE
BELFIELD RD
DO
VER
CO
URT R
D
HU
MB
ER
COL LEGE BLVD
COSBURN AVE
OR
TON
PARK R
D
LOG
AN AVE
PAR
KS
IDE
DR
ALNESS
ST
EVANS AVE
WAR
DEN
AVE
KE
NN
ED
YR
D
BEDFO
RD
RD
SOU
TH
KINGSWA
Y
DUPONT ST
EASTLIBE RTY
S T
HEATH ST E
YORK MILLS RD
LAKE SHORE BLVD E
DU
ND
AL
K
DR
BLOOR ST W
HIG
HW
AY27
S
SE
NTI N
EL
RD
COMMISSIONERS ST
THE QUEENSWAY
THE WESTWAY
WE
STO
NR
D
SAMMON AVE
QUEEN ST E
TI M BER
BA
NK
BLV D
QUEENS QUAY
E
O CONNOR DR
OA
KWO
OD
AVE
SHEPPARD AVE W
DREWRY AVE
OLD FINCH AVE
THE POND RD
DAVENPORT RD
WILSON AVE
RATHBURN RD
FLE
M
I NGTON
R D
QUEEN ST W
RANEE AVE
ELLISAVE
REXDALE BLVD
BROOKE AVE
DO
NM
ILL
SR
D
GREENBELT
DR
OLD
KINGSTON
RD
OLD
WE
STO
NR
D
DUNDAS ST W
DU
FFERIN
ST
MILL RD
JAME
SON
AVE
GLENCAIRN AVE
CO
XW
ELL AVE
LAKE SHORE BLVD E
RUSTIC RD
CH
ESTERLE
BLV
D
BROO KB
A
NKSD
R
LAWRENCE AVE E
PASSMORE AVE
BERTRAND AVE
ST CLAIR AVE E
MO
RR
ISH R
D
PHA
RM
ACY
AVE
UN
IVER
SITY
AVE
SHER
BOU
RN
E ST
DE
AN
PARK RD
EAST AVE
TRANSIT
RD
EGLI
NTON
AVE
W
MOORE AVE
TR UDELLE ST
DR
IFT
W
OODA
VE
CRESCENT
RD
QUEENS QUAY W
GR
AC
E ST
NUGGET AVE
MILNER AVE
DA
NFO
RTH
RD
S
ILVER
TH
OR
NA
VE
PAR
KLAW
NRD
MAN
SE R
D
BRO
CK AVE
JARVIS S
T
BEVE
R LYGLE
NBLV D
WOBURN
AVE
PH
AR
MA
CY
AV E
JOH
N
GARLA N DBL
VD
DUNC
AN
W OODS
DR
ST CLAIR AVE E
DU
PLEX
AV
E
INVER GORDON
AVE
BEVER
LEY ST
THISTLE
DOWN
BLVD
ME
ADO
WVA
LER
D
FEN
SIDE
DR
BLYTHWOOD RD
VICTO
RIA ST
FASKEN DR
BETHRIDGE RD
MIMICO
AVE
SE
WE
L LS
RD
L AN
SD
OW
NE
AVE
BLOOR ST E
GA
LLOW
AY RD
ROSELAWN AVE
CATHERINEST
GRAYDONHALL
D R
MORNING
STAR DR
MACK
AVE
DO
NLAN
DS
AVE
CHU RCH ST
STEELES AVE E
KEELE ST
CA
LED
ON
IAR
D
LAMBTON AVE
JON
ES AVE
DA
WE
SR
D
DISCO RD
CANMORE
BLVD
BR
OW
NS
LINE
MOSSBAN
KD
R
DU
NN
AVE
PITFIELD
RD
CU
L FO
RD
RD
MILL ST
PR
INC
E
PHILIP
BLVD
HOPEST
B
ANNATYNE
DR
MURR AY
ROSS
PKWYDUNCA NMILL RD
WH
ITE
HE
ATHE
RB
LVD
ELM R
D
COMSTOCK RD
MC
CA
UL S
T
NEW TORONTO ST
MAM
MOT
H
H
ALL
TR
L
M
CR
AEDR
CA SS
AVE
LAPPIN
AVE
MU RISO
N
B LVD
SHAV
ER
AVE S
BONI S
AVE
MO
UNT
OLIVE DR
FRONT ST E
FRONT ST W
L
A NYARD
RD
SHOREHAM DR
JED
BU
RG
H
RD
AVONDALE AVE
SYMIN
GTO
N AVE
HALLAM ST
BRI
DLEW
OO
DBLV
D
CEN
TEN
NIA
L RD
FAYW
OO
DB
LVD
HU
MBE
RBL
VD
SPAD
INA R
D
ELDER
AVE
BERRY RD
NASHDENE RD
EASTW OOD
RD
COR ONATION DR
MA
INS
T
BURROWSHALL
BLVD
YONGE
BLVD
WIN
COTTD
R
INGRAM
DR
FLORENCE AVE
UN
DE
RH
ILLD
R
BLAC
KC
REE
KD
R
CLEN
DE
NAN
AV
E
SAVARIN ST
CLIN
TON
ST
ST JOHNS
RD
KIDRO NVALLE Y
DR
WAS
HBUR
NW
AY
BI C
KN
ELL
AVE
NORSEMAN ST
EDITHD
R
AR
M
OUR
BLV
D
DY
NAM
ICDR
WILLO
WD
ALE
AVE
CAR
LING
VIEW D
R
VARSITYRD
CLA NS
MAN
B LVD
FENNAVE
LINKW
OO
D
LANE
WILSO
NH
EIG
HT
SB
LVD
TWYN RIV
ER
S DR
OLD FINCH AVE
DENTON AVE
ELLENDALEDR
OA
SIS BLVD
CUMMER AVE
VILLAGE
GREENSQ
FENMAR DR
W
INTERMU
T
EBLVD
CAN
ONG
ATE
TRL
BARBE R
G
REENE RD
NYM
ARK
AVE
HOLLIS AVE
PRI N CESS
MARGARETBL
VD
DOR COTAVE
PRIN
CE
EDW
ARD
DR
S
SL ANAVE
ROSELAWN
AVE
CH
ALK
FA
RM
DR
TOR
RESD
A
LE
AVE
BERING
AVE
THE ESPLANAD E
BROADWAY AVE FAIRFAX CRES
SCARDEN
AVE
ADVANCE RD
CORIN
T H I ANB
LVD
DENLOWBLVD
FORE
STG
RO
VED
R
IN
G LETO
NB
LVD
THE
KINGSWAY
HIS
COCKBL
VD
BEARE
RD
FERRIS RD
ST GE
OR
GE ST
GRANDRAVINEDR
HU
MB
ER
LINE
DR
NEWTON DR
ALLIANCE AVE
CHER
RYST
ATTW
ELLDR
JUDSON ST
BA
RTLEY DR
SHO
RN
CLIFF E
RD
LITT
LES
RD
PAG
EAVE
CORVETTE AVE
ALL AN
FORD
RD
BRIMWOOD
BLVD
LIN
GR
D
HYMUS RD
WIN
DE
RM
ERE
AV
E
LA ROSE AVE
SL
OAN
EA
VE
MONTGOMERYRD
EGLINTON
AVE W
F
RIEN
DSHIP
AV E
E LM HURST DR
HAR
RIS
ON
RD
BIRMINGHAM ST
MILD
EN
HA
LL
RD
WILFR
ED
AVE
GUN
NS
RD
F ENE
LON
DR
OVERBROOK PL
BELLAMY R
D
S
JOHN
T AB OR
T
RL
SPAD
INA
AVE
ELM
AVE
WOODSWORT
HRD
ELM
RIDGEDR
DUNDAS
ST E
GLE
NC
EDA
R
RD
SOUDAN AVE
NE
ILSO
NDR
LUMSDEN
AVE
KIN
GS
TON
RD
MO
UN
T
PLE
AS
AN
T
RD
EXBURY RD
LLOY
D
MAN
OR
RD
FISHERVILLE RD
MID
L
AND
AVE
PAINTED
POST
DR
MEA
DO
WVA
LE RD
HILD
A AVE
KEELER BLVD
PA RKVIEW
HILL
CR ES
FALSTAFF AVE
VALERMO DR
GE
RVA
ISD
R
GEARY
AVE
POPLAR
RD
PL ACEN
TIA
BLVD
SPENVALLEY
DR
EARL PL
BEECHGROVEDR
MELRO SE AVE
UPJO
HN
RD
FIELDW
AY
RD
FOXRIDGE
DR
CAN
MO
TOR
AVE
IND
IAN
RD
RAY
AVE
CASSANDRA
BLVD
HA
WK
SB
UR
Y
DR
SIG
NE
TD
R
CENTENN
IAL
P
A R K
BLV
D
EDE NB
RID
GEDR
BR
I MLEY
RD
S
WICKSTEED AVE
HILL
CR
ES
GORDON
MACKAY RD
CASEBRIDGE
CRT
OAKST
MAS
ON
RD
ELM
RIDGE
DR
PALMER
STON
BLVD
RESOURCES
RD
CIVICRD
ORFUS RD
BER GAMOT AVE
HIGH
PARK
BLVD
PASSMORE
AVE
NEP
TUNE
DR
INDUSTRY ST
BRIDGELAND
AVE
GIBBS RD
CANA DIAN
RD
ISLA
ND
RD
STEEPROCK
DR
SUNRISE AVE
TUXEDO CRT
PARK HOME
AVE
PATRICIA AVE
PE
TROLIA
RD
OAKRIDGE
DR
GARYRAY DRELLERSLIE AVE
PLEWES RD
VE
NTU
R E
DR
G
OLDFINCHCRTCOR O NATION DR
M
ELFO
R DD R
EAST DR
TAN
GIER
SR
D
RACINE RD
PRO
DU
CTIO
N
DR
HIG
HPA
RK
AVE
ASHTONBEE RD
DUNELM ST
MILLIKEN
BLVD
CLAYSO
N
RD
JUTLAND RD
TYCOS DR
PICK
ERIN
G TO
WN
LINE
METROPOLITAN
RD
LESMIL
L RD
UPTON RD
TORYORK DR
RI V
ALD
A
RD
TITAN RD
PARK
LANE CRCL
THEBRIDLE
PATH
FINCH AVE
E
MID
DLE
FIELD
RD
LIVING
STO
N R
D
BATHU
RST ST
MO
UN
TP
LEA
SA
NT
RD
RIVE
R S
T
SOR
AUR
EN AVE
PARLIAM
EN
T ST
BRO
ADVIEW
AVE
MC
CO
WAN
RD
FORTYORK
BLVD
BAY STRE
NFO
RT
HD
R
DO
N M
ILLS R
D
SPAD
INA R
D
CAR
RIE
R
DR
RO
NC
ESVA
LLES AVE
CH
ER
RY
ST
NE
IL SO
NR
D
NORTH QUEEN ST
OR
IOLE
PK
WY
MILITARY TRL
MA
RIN
E
PARA
DE
DR
HUM
BE
RW
O
OD BLVD
SILVER
SPRINGS
B
LVD
ST DEN N
ISD
R
THE
DONW
AYE
C
HA RTLAND B LVD
S
GO
LDH
AW
K TRL
BLOO
RR
AMP
THE
WE
STM
ALL
WE
LLES
W
ORT
H
DR
KINGSTON R
D
SENECA HILL DR
CAN
LISH
RD
BRIA
N D
R
PAPE AV
E
ST
PHIL
LI P
SR
D
PARK
RD
TALB
OT
RD
AVEN
UE R
D
THE KINGSWAY
GLE
N
R
USH
BLVD
PO
RTR
OYA
L
T RL
EM M
ET
T
AVE
LY
NNBR
OOK DR
PLUG HAT
RD
KINGSL AKE
R
D
DONM
ILLS
RD
E
ELLING
TON
DR
RAL
EIG
H A
VE
NO
RF IN
CH
DR
ARROWR
D
WE
STMO
RE D
R
HU
LLMA
R
D R
THE
DO
NWAY
W
CALVINGTON DR
AL
EXMUIR
BLVD
FAIRVIEWMALLDR
MC
INTO
SH
ST
BANBURY RD
BAN
BU
RYR
D
FAWCE
TTTRL
WIC
K SO N
TRL
CRO
WTRL
GLE
N
WATFO
RD
DR
HORNER AVE
PACKARD
BLVD
BIRKDALE
RD
GLE
N R
D
GR
AN
D AV
E
BAYMIL LS
BLVD
DO
NM
I LLS
RD
W
DEWE
YD
R
HU
PF
IELD
TRL
UPPER
CANADA
DR
GO
RD
ON
BA
KE
RR
D
VA
LLEY
WO
ODS
RD
MILLWICK DR
CO
N SUME RS
RD
WILL IA
MR
ALLENRD
OA
KD
ALE
RD
MILVAN DR
MID
WE
ST
RD
TOR
BARR
IE RD
BR
AH
MS
AV
E
FINCHD
EN
ESQ
CO
M
M ANDER
BLV
D
SKYWAY
AVE
RONS
ON D
R
FLI N
TR
D
NO
RE
LCO
DR
CH
AN
NE
L
NIN
EC
RT
BIL L YBIS HOP
W AY PRINCE
ANDREW
PL
RA
IL
S IDE
RD
HO
WD
EN R
D
LAKE ONTARIO
±
Data source: City of Toronto / IBI Group, 2016Projection: NAD 1927 MTM 3
Date: July 2016Cartography: Vélo Québec
0 3 6 km
!
Toronto
U.S.A
LAKE ONTARIO
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2016 10
2.4 Official Plan Draft Cycling Policy Framework The Official Plan Review of Transportation Policies includes new text to establish a bicycle policy framework, and revised text that strengthens the existing policy that promotes cycling. The new policies, currently in draft form, are proposed as part of Section 2.4 Bringing the City Together: A Progressive Agenda of Transportation Change.
The new text explains that guidelines, programs and infrastructure will be developed and implemented to create safe, comfortable and bicycle-friendly environments that encourage people of all ages to bicycle for everyday transportation and recreation. The draft policies focus on ways to expand the cycling network, enhance the convenience and attractiveness of the cycling network, make cycling a safer travel mode, and provide convenient high-quality short-term and long-term bicycle parking facilities at key locations throughout the city.
The draft policies, along with new introductory text and sidebars, will be refined through consultation with external stakeholders and the public scheduled in late 2018 and early 2019. The finalized policies, as part of the Official Plan Review, are expected to be reported to Council in 2019.
2.5 Toronto Road Safety Plan The Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan proposes new dedicated and connected cycling facilities across the city. The 2017-2021 Road Safety Plan'sxvii additional safety enhancement programs will implement improvements to existing cycling routes and facilities using cyclist collision data to identify high risk corridors and intersections.
Improvements and enhancements could include additional pavement markings, signs and bollards and construction of raised or separated cycling facilities. This also includes pilot studies / evaluations of new and emerging designs, applications, countermeasures and technologies for cyclist safety. Dedicated and separated cycling facilities, such as buffered bike lanes, cycle tracks, bike trails, bike boxes, signage and pavement markings, provide greater guidance and protection for cyclists from vehicular traffic than shared and unmarked facilities.
In addition, the Road Safety Plan identifies the following countermeasures which will change the built environment to make Toronto's streets safer for cycling:
Intersection safety improvements, including as applicable the installation of bicyclecrossing signals;
A pilot study will be conducted on the technological and financial requirements ofimplementing an advanced green for cyclists at signalized cyclist crossings;
Reductions to the posted speed limits for those street locations identified in theRoad Safety Plan report;
Speed enforcement measures in construction zones;
Enhancements to the automated detection of cyclists at high cyclist volumeintersections;
An expansion of speed enforcement measures and the "Watch Your Speed"Program to include the use of permanent speed display signs exclusively in school zones; and
New enforcement measures to be undertaken by the Toronto Police Service insupport of the Road Safety Plan.
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2016 11
2.6 Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines The City of Toronto developed Complete Streets Guidelinesxviii to provide a holistic approach for how we design our city streets. This builds on many of the City's existing policies, guidelines and recent successful street design and construction projects.
Complete streets are streets that are designed to be safe for all users, such as people who walk, bicycle, take transit or drive, and people of varying ages and levels of ability. They also consider other uses like sidewalk cafés, street furniture, street trees, utilities, and stormwater management.
While not every type of use or user may be accommodated on every street, the goal is to build a city with a well-functioning street network that supports and sustains our quality of life in Toronto. Complete streets will ensure that social, economic and environmental priorities are integrated in street planning and design. For more information on how the Complete Streets Guidelines will be used alongside the City of Toronto’s Cycling Network Plan, please see Section 10.4.2 of this report.
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2016 12
3 Study Process The Ten Year Cycling Network Plan study is intended to identify the most meaningful projects for cyclists and ‘would-be’ cyclists to be scheduled and implemented over the next 5 and 10 years. The cycling projects that the City will implement have to be the “most meaningful” in terms of being located throughout the city; supported by stakeholders and the public; fill gaps; overcome barriers; upgrade existing bikeways when a new type would better serve the users and fit the corridor context; integrate with transit; connect key places with high levels of cycling activity or potential; connect to adjacent municipalities; and fulfill City policies.
The study process consisted of the following major components as illustrated in Exhibit 3-1.
1. Undertake a critical review of the recommended network in the 2001 Toronto BikePlan with the project team. This review resulted in a draft map of key cyclingprojects as per the 2001 Toronto Bike Plan plus new opportunities for cyclingfacilities that warranted further analysis for their impact on cycling, and werepresented for stakeholder and public consultation. The process of reviewing thecycling network is documented in Section 4;
2. Analyze the impact of the network on cycling, i.e., determine those routes that arethe “most meaningful”, based on the following criteria:
Current cycling demand
Potential demand
Coverage, i.e. areas of the city that lack bikeways
Barriers and opportunities to cross them or improve existing crossings
Population and employment density
Trip generators
Safety
Connectivity
Higher-priority transit station connections
These criteria are described in detail and the maps that represent the data are provided in Section 5 and Subsections 5.1 to 5.9;
3. Consult with stakeholders and the public regarding the draft cycling network map to incorporate their opinions and preferences. These consultations are documented in Section 6;
4. Undertake a priority analysis of which routes should be implemented each year for the next five and ten years. This consisted of first determining the type of cycling facility feasible for the various cycling routes, and then the associated cost to implement them. Coordination opportunities to implement the cycling routes as part of other municipal projects were also determined. The cycling impact analysis, consultation results and feasibility analysis were combined to determine project priorities. An overall schedule of projects was developed by evaluating coordination opportunities and project priorities. This cycling project priority analysis is documented in Section 7; and,
5. Prepare a schedule of projects for each of five scenarios based on various funding levels. Each scenario included funding the implementation of the approved Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan projects; the Ten Year Plan Cycling Network (Connect and Grow projects); the existing network upgrades (Renew projects); and
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2016 13
bicycle parking, i.e. bike racks and bike stations. The funding scenarios are documented in Section 8; the Renew program is documented in Section 9.
The recommended Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan, including the Bikeway Trails projects; the Ten Year Plan Cycling Network; the existing network upgrades and bicyc le parking, is presented in Section 10.
Resources to deliver and maintain the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan are discussed in Section 11.
Section 12 of the report presents objectives to track and monitor the delivery of the plan.
The recommendations of the report as approved by Council are presented in Section 13.
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2016 14
Exhibit 3-1: Ten Year Cycling Network Implementation Plan Study Process
EXISTING CYCLING
IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TEN YEAR CYCLING NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for City of Toronto
April 17, 2016 15
4 Cycling Network Critical Review The recommended cycling network in the 2001 Bike Plan formed the basis of the network to be reviewed and updated, and then analyzed to develop a ten year implementation plan. Most of the downtown cycling routes recommended in the 2001 Bike Plan have been installed. A key goal of the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan for downtown is to further enhance the existing network by adding new routes and enhancing existing routes. Most of the routes recommended in 2001 for Scarborough, North York and Etobicoke have not been installed. A key goal of the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan in these areas is to learn lessons from the past ten years about what did not work and why, and re-evaluate what can now be done to make these parts of Toronto great places to ride a bike moving forward.
This critical review of the cycling network was undertaken in consultation with a number of stakeholders before being issued as the draft digital map for public review:
Transportation Services staff in the Cycling Unit: These staff are responsible forimplementing the cycling network. They provided an understanding of which projectsdid not move forward and why. Some projects were difficult to achieve technically,others were not supported by the area residents or businesses, and some wheretabled in favour of other nearby opportunities or investments that arose. Staff alsoincorporated ideas from Cycle Toronto that were presented at an event in November2014, as documented in Section 6.4. Two working meetings with staff were held inMarch 2015;
Ten Year Cycling Network Plan Project Team: There were nine meetings heldwith the Project Team from November 2014 to February 2016. Three of thesemeetings focused on the cycling network review, with minor edits made atsubsequent meetings. Staff involved in the Project Team provided information oncycling route and network recommendations from roadway EnvironmentalAssessments, Secondary Plans, Precinct Plans and Avenue Studies. They alsoprovided information on barrier crossings, and rapid transit projects that includedcycling facilities; and,
District staff: Four meetings were held, one in each District, in May 2015. Staffmarked up maps of the cycling network, revising cycling routes based on trafficoperational issues and opportunities, construction co-ordination opportunities, andknowledge of studies and field conditions surrounding specific cycling routes.Additional information on consultation with District staff is provided in Section 6.2.
The draft cycling network map produced from the above consultations was further reviewed during the Phase 2 consultations, as documented in Section 6.6.