figure 1 – profile · 2008-03-05 · c) the width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in...

48
DESIGN EXAMPLE 1 This example illustrates the design of an interior and exterior beam of a precast prestressed concrete beam bridge using fully prestressed beams with harped bonded strands in accordance with the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Third Edition, Customary US Units and through the 2005 Interims. The bridge consists of a 120-foot simple span. The bridge profile is shown in Figure 1 and the typical section is shown in Figure 2. The concrete deck is 9 inches thick and the abutments are not skewed. 120'-0" Figure 1 – Profile Centerline bridge 1'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0" 1'-0" AASHTO Type VI Beam 4'-9" 9'-6" 4'-9" 4'-9" 9'-6" 4'-9" Near Abutment Near Midspan 10" thick concrete diaphragm Figure 2 – Typical Section DESIGN PARAMERS Corrosion exposure condition for the stress limit for tension in the beam concrete: severe Provisions for a future wearing surface: 0.025 k/ft 2 Rail dead load per each rail: 0.278 k/foot Diaphragm dead load per each 10-inch thick diaphragm: 5.590 k Deck concrete 28-day strength: 5 ksi f c ' = 5 ksi ( )( ) E w f c c = = = 33000 33000 0145 5 4074 15 15 . ' . . ksi (5.4.2.4-1) Beam concrete 28-day strength: 8 ksi f c ' = 8 ksi ( )( ) E c = = 33000 0145 8 5154 15 . . ksi Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 1

Upload: others

Post on 14-Feb-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

DESIGN EXAMPLE 1 This example illustrates the design of an interior and exterior beam of a precast prestressed concrete beam bridge using fully prestressed beams with harped bonded strands in accordance with the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Third Edition, Customary US Units and through the 2005 Interims. The bridge consists of a 120-foot simple span. The bridge profile is shown in Figure 1 and the typical section is shown in Figure 2. The concrete deck is 9 inches thick and the abutments are not skewed.

120'-0"

Figure 1 – Profile

Centerline bridge1'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0" 1'-0"

AASHTO Type VI Beam

4'-9" 9'-6" 4'-9" 4'-9" 9'-6" 4'-9"

Near AbutmentNear Midspan

10" thick concrete diaphragm

Figure 2 – Typical Section

DESIGN PARAMERS Corrosion exposure condition for the stress limit for tension in the beam concrete: severe Provisions for a future wearing surface: 0.025 k/ft2

Rail dead load per each rail: 0.278 k/foot Diaphragm dead load per each 10-inch thick diaphragm: 5.590 k Deck concrete 28-day strength: 5 ksi fc

' = 5 ksi

( )( )E w fc c= = =33000 33000 0145 5 40741 5 1 5. ' .. ksi (5.4.2.4-1) Beam concrete 28-day strength: 8 ksi fc

' = 8 ksi

( )( )Ec = =33000 0145 8 51541 5. . ksi

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 1

Page 2: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

Beam concrete strength at release: 7 ksi fci

' = 7 ksi

( )( )Eci = =33000 0145 7 48211 5. . ksi Non-prestressed reinforcement: Grade 60 fy = 60 ksi (5.4.3.2) E s = 29 000, ksi

sii

Prestressing steel: 0.6-inch diameter, 270-ksi low relaxation strand fpu = 270 ksi (Table 5.4.4.1-1) ( )( )f kpy = = =0 90 0 90 270 243. .fpu

(5.4.4.2) Eps = 28 500, ks SECTION PROPERTIES The non-composite and composite section properties are summarized in Table 1. Although the haunch between the top of the girder and the bottom of the deck slab is not included in the composite section properties, it is included in the dead loads. In order to calculate the composite section properties, first calculate the effective flange width. Effective Flange Width (4.6.2.6.1) Calculate the effective flange width for the interior beam first. For the interior beam, the effective flange width may be taken as the least of: a) One-quarter of the effective span length: 120 feet for simple spans (0.25)(120)(12) = 360 in b) Twelve time the average thickness of the slab, 9 inches, plus the greater of: The web thickness: 8 inches One-half of the top flange of the girder: 42 inches

(0.5)(42) = 21 in The greater of these two values is 21 inches and: (12)(9) + 21 = 129 in c) The average spacing of adjacent beams: 9.5 feet (9.5)(12) = 114 in The least of these is 114 inches and therefore, the effective flange width is 114 inches. For the exterior beam, the effective flange width may be taken as one-half the effective flange width of the adjacent interior beam, 114 inches, plus the least of: a) One-eight of the effective span length: 120 feet (0.125)(120)(12) = 180 in b) Six times the average thickness of the slab, 9 inches, plus the greater of: One-half of the web thickness: 8 inches

(0.5)(8) = 4 in One-quarter of the top flange of the girder: 42 inches

(0.25)(42) = 10.5 in The greater of these two values is 10.5 inches and: (6)(9) + 10.5 = 64.5 in

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 2

Page 3: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57 = 114 in Composite Section Properties A = area of non-composite beam or deck (in2) d = distance between the centers of gravity of the beam or deck and the composite section

(in) Io = moment of inertia of non-composite beam or deck (in4) Icomp = moment of inertia of composite section (in4) Sb = section modulus of non-composite section, extreme bottom beam fiber (in3) Sbc = section modulus of composite section, extreme bottom beam fiber (in3) Sslab top = section modulus of composite section, extreme top deck slab fiber (in3) St = section modulus of non-composite section, extreme top beam fiber (in3) Stc = section modulus of composite section, extreme top beam fiber (in3) yb = distance from the center of gravity of the non-composite section to the bottom of the

beam (in) ybc = distance from the center of gravity of the composite section to the bottom of the beam

(in) yslab top = distance from the center of gravity of the composite section to the top of the deck slab

(in) yt = distance from the center of gravity of the non-composite section to the top of the beam

(in) ytc = distance from the center of gravity of the composite section to the top of the beam (in) w = weight of the non-composite beam (k/ft) For the composite section, the modular ratio, n, to account for different concrete strengths in the beam and deck slab is:

nEE

deck

beam= = =

40745154

0 7906.

The transformed deck area is: ( )( )( )A = =114 0 7906 9 81112. . 2 in

The moment of inertia of the transformed deck area is: ( )( )( )

Io = =114 0 7906 9

125475

3. in3

A yb Ayb d Ad2 Io Io + Ad2

Deck 811.12 76.50 62051.00 22.96 427499 5475 432974Beam 1085.00 36.38 39472.30 17.16 319590 733320 1052910Total 1896.12 101523.30 1485884

yAyAbc

b= = =∑∑

10152330189612

5354.

.. in S

Iybc

c

bc= = =

14858845354

27751.

in3

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 3

Page 4: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

y h ytc beam bc= − = − =72 5354 18 46. . in SIytc

c

tc= = =

148588418 46

80503.

in3

y y tslab top tc slab= + = + =18 46 9 27 46. . in ( )( )SI

y nslab topc

slab top= = =

148588427 46 0 7906

68443. .

in3

(114)(0.7906) = 90.12"

C. G. Composite Section

53.5

4"

C. G. Slab

72"

9 "

76.5

0"

22.9

6"

C. G. Beam

36.3

8"17

.16"

18.4

6"

Figure 3 – Composite Section, Interior and Exterior Beams

Table 1 – Section Properties Non-composite Section Composite Section

Property Type VI Beams Property Interior Beam Exterior Beam A (in2) 1085 Icomp (in4) 1485884 1485884 I (in4) 733320 ybc (in) 53.54 53.54 yb (in) 36.38 ytc (in) 18.46 18.46 yt (in) 35.62 yslab top (in) 27.46 27.46

Sb (in3) 20157 Sbc (in3) 27751 27751 St (in3) 20587 Stc (in3) 80503 80503 w (k/ft) 1.130 Sslab top (in3) 68443 68443

DEAD LOADS The rail and future wearing surface allowance loads are distributed equally to all beams. Interior Beam The dead loads, DC, acting on the non-composite section are:

Beam: 1.130 k/foot Slab: (9.5)(0.75)(0.150) = 1.069 k/ft Haunch: 0.025 k/foot Diaphragms: 5.590 k at midspan

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 4

Page 5: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

The dead load, DC, acting on the composite section is: Rail: ( )( )0 278 2

40139

..= k / ft

The dead load, DW, acting on the composite section is: Future wearing surface allowance (FWS):

( )( )0 025 36

40 225

..= k / ft

Exterior Beam The dead loads, DC, acting on the non-composite section are:

Beam: 1.130 k/foot Slab: (9.5)(0.75)(0.150) = 1.069 k/ft Haunch: 0.025 k/foot Diaphragms: 2.795 k at midspan

The dead load, DC, acting on the composite section is: Rail: 0.139 k/foot

The dead load, DW, acting on the composite section is: FWS: 0.225 k/foot

DISTRIBUTION OF LIVE LOAD Use the approximate formulas found in Article 4.6.2.2 for cross section k, a concrete slab on concrete beams. Kg = longitudinal stiffness parameter (in4) L = span length (ft) Nb = number of girders S = girder spacing (ft) ts = deck slab thickness (in) Interior Beam LONGITUDINAL STIFFNESS PARAMETER (4.6.2.2.1) eg = the distance between the centers of gravity of the basic beam and the deck (in)

e yt

g ts= + = + =

23562

92

4012. . in

The modular ratio for calculating the longitudinal stiffness parameter is:

nEE

B

D= = =

51544074

12651.

The longitudinal stiffness parameter is:

( ) ( ) ( )( )[ ]K n I Aeg g= + = + =2 212651 733320 1085 4012 3137123. . 4 in

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 5

Page 6: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

DISTRIBUTION OF LIVE LOAD FOR MOMENT (4.6.2.2.2b) Check the range of applicability. 35 16 0. .≤ ≤S S = 9.5 feet O.K. 4 5 12 0 9. .≤ ≤ =ts t inches O.K.s 20 240≤ ≤L L = 120 feet O.K. 10 000 7 000 000 3137 123, , , , ,≤ ≤ =Kg K in O.K.g

4

Nb ≥ =4 4 N O.K.b For one design lane loaded:

( )( )( )g

S SL

KLtg

s= +

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

⎝⎜

⎠⎟ = +

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =0 06

14 12 00 06

9 514

9 5120

313712312 120 9

05060 4 0 3

3

0 1 0 4 0 3

3

0 1

..

.. .

.. . . . . .

For the fatigue limit state, remove the multiple presence factor.

g = =050612

0 422..

.

For two or more design lanes loaded:

( )( )( )g

S SL

KLtg

s= +

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

⎝⎜

⎠⎟ = +

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =0 075

9 5 12 00 075

9 59 5

9 5120

313712312 120 9

0 7410 6 0 2

3

0 1 0 6 0 2

3

0 1

.. .

...

..

. . . . . .

DISTRIBUTION OF LIVE LOAD FOR SHEAR (4.6.2.2.3a) Check the range of applicability. 35 16 0. .≤ ≤S S = 9.5 feet O.K. 4 5 12 0 9. .≤ ≤ =ts t inches O.K.s 20 240≤ ≤L L = 120 feet O.K. 10 000 7 000 000 3137 123, , , , ,≤ ≤ =Kg K in O.K.g

4

Nb ≥ =4 4 N O.K.b For one design lane loaded:

gS

= + = + =0 36250

0 369 5250

0 740..

...

.

For the fatigue limit state, remove the multiple presence factor:

g = =0 74012

0 617..

.

For two or more design lanes loaded:

gS S

= + −⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ = + −

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =0 2

12 350 2

9 512

9 535

0 9182 0 2 0

. .. .

.. .

Exterior Beam DISTRIBUTION OF LIVE LOAD FOR MOMENT (4.6.2.2.2d) For one design lane loaded, use the lever rule and apply the multiple presence factor, m, because the truck is manually positioned on the bridge cross section. When manually positioning the trucks, the first design lane is placed immediately adjacent to the face of the traffic rail and subsequent lanes are placed immediately adjacent to the previous. The closest truck wheel is placed no closer than two feet from the edge of its design lane. When using the lever rule,

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 6

Page 7: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

assume hinges at all interior beams and solve for the reaction at the exterior beams. This reaction, when expressed in terms of lanes, is a lane fraction for the exterior beams.

2'6' 1'

9.5' 4.75'

5.25'assumed hinge

12' design lanecenterline of bridge

P1 P1

Figure 4 – Lever Rule

Solving for the reaction, R, at the exterior beam:

R =+

=525 1125

9 51737

. ..

. wheels = 0.868 lanes

g = mR = (1.2)(0.868) = 1.042 For the fatigue limit state, g = 0.868 For two or more design lanes loaded, the lane fraction is found by applying a multiplier, e, to the interior beam lane fraction for two or more design lanes loaded. This multiplier is a function of the distance from the exterior web of the exterior beam to the interior edge of the curb or traffic barrier, de. de = 4.75 – 1.00 – 0.3333 = 3.4167 ft Check the range of applicability. − ≤ ≤ =10 55 34167. . .de d feet O.K.e

ede= + = + =0 7791

0 7734167

9111455.

..

..

.

g = e ginterior = (1.1455)(0.741) = 0.848 DISTRIBUTION OF LIVE LOAD FOR SHEAR (4.6.2.2.3b) For one design lane loaded, use the lever rule. However, this is the same lane fraction for moment, 1.042, and for the fatigue limit state the lane fraction is 0.868. For two or more design lanes loaded, apply a multiplier, e, to the lane fraction for two or more design lanes loaded. Check the range of applicability. − ≤ ≤ =10 55 34167. . .de d feet O.K.e

ede= + = + =0 610

0 634167

100 9417. .

..

g = e ginterior = (0.9417)(0.918) = 0.864

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 7

Page 8: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

DISTRIBUTION OF LIVE LOAD FOR MOMENT AND SHEAR Apply the additional investigation provision, which is for moment (4.6.2.2.2d) and shear (4.6.2.2.3b). Once again, when manually positioning the trucks, place the design lanes in the same manner as for the lever rule and apply the multiple presence factor, m. Use the suggested commentary equation, C4.6.2.2.2d-1.

2' 6' 1'

center of gravity design truck 1

4.75'4.75'

14.25' 4.75'

center of gravity girder pattern

12' design lane 1

P1 P1

6'13'

Figure 5 – Rigid Body Rule, One Design Lane Loaded

2' 6' 6' 1'

4.75'4.75'

14.25' 4.75'

center of gravity design truck 2

12' design lane 112' design lane 2

P1P2 P1P2 2'

6'13'

5'1'

center of gravity girder pattern center of gravity design truck 1

Figure 6 – Rigid Body Rule, Two Design Lanes Loaded

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 8

Page 9: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

For one design lane loaded: ( )( )

( ) ( ) ( )[ ]RNN

x ex

L

B

ext= + = ++

= + =∑

∑ 2 2 214

14 25 132 4 75 14 25

14

1852545125

0 661.

. ...

.

g = mR = (1.2)(0.661) = 0.793 For the fatigue limit state, g = 0.661 For two design lanes loaded:

( )( )R = +

+=

24

14 25 13 145125

0 942.

..

g = mR = (1.0)(0.942) = 0.942 ADJUSTMENT IN LANE FRACTIONS FOR SKEWED BRIDGES Since the skew angle is zero degrees, there is no adjustment for skew. SUMMARY OF LANE FRACTIONS The calculated live load lane fractions are summarized in Table 2. The controlling lane fractions are the largest value for moment and shear for the interior and the exterior beams. The controlling lane fractions are then applied to the appropriate live load envelope for one lane of live load to calculate the design live load moments and shears.

Table 2 – Lane Fractions Moment Shear Interior Beam

One lane loaded 0.506 0.740 Two lanes loaded 0.741 0.918 One lane loaded - fatigue 0.422 0.617

Exterior Beam One lane loaded 1.042 1.042 Two lanes loaded 0.848 0.864 One lane loaded - fatigue 0.868 0.868 Additional investigation One lane loaded 0.793 0.793 Two lanes loaded 0.942 0.942 One lane loaded - fatigue 0.661 0.661

Table 3 – Controlling Lane Fractions

Moment Shear Interior Beam

Service, Strength Limit States 0.741 0.918 Fatigue Limit State 0.422 0.617

Exterior Beam Service, Strength Limit States 1.042 1.042 Fatigue Limit State 0.868 0.868

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 9

Page 10: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

LIMIT STATES Limit states are groups of events or circumstances that cause structures to be unserviceable. The four limit states are Service, Fatigue, Strength, and Extreme Event. The service limit state (5.5.2) places restrictions on stresses, deformations, and crack width under service conditions. The fatigue and fracture limit state (5.5.3) places restrictions on stress range in reinforcement and prestressing tendons under service conditions. The intent is to limit crack growth under repetitive loads and prevent fracture. The strength limit state (5.5.4) is intended to ensure strength and stability and to resist statistically significant load combinations. The extreme event limit state (5.5.5) is intended to ensure structural survival during extreme events as appropriate to the site and use. Includes earthquake, ice load, collision by vessels and vehicles, and certain hydraulic events (major floods). The most common limit states for prestressed concrete beam design are: Strength I - Basic load combination relating to the normal vehicular use of the bridge without wind.

1.25 DC + 1.5 DW + 1.75 (LL + IM) Strength II - Load combination relating to the use of the bridge by Owner-specified special design vehicles, evaluation permit vehicles, or both without wind.

1.25 DC + 1.5 DW + 1.35 (LL + IM) Service I - Load combination relating to the normal operational use of the bridge with a 55 MPH wind and all loads taken at their nominal values. Also to control crack width in reinforced concrete structures.

1.0 DC + 1.00 DW + 1.00 (LL + IM) Service III - Load combination relating only to tension in prestressed concrete superstructures with the object of crack control.

1.0 DC + 1.00 DW + 0.80 (LL + IM) Fatigue - Fatigue and fracture load combination relating to repetitive gravitational vehicular live load and dynamic response under a single design truck. 0.75 (LL + IM) BEAM STRESSES In order to determine the number of required strands, first calculate the maximum tensile stress in the beam for Service III Limit State. The number of required strands is usually controlled by the maximum tensile stress. Provide enough effective prestress force so that the tensile stresses in the beam meet the tensile stress limit. For simple spans beams, the maximum tensile force is at midspan at the extreme bottom beam fibers. The tension service stress at the bottom beam fibers, can be calculated using:

fM M

SM M M

Sbottombeam slab

b

rail FWS LL

bc= −

+−

+ + 08. (Service III Limit State)

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 10

Page 11: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

Table 4 – Beam Moments at Midspan (k-ft)

Dead Load Live Load plus Dynamic Load allowance

Non-composite Composite Composite Beam

Beam Slab/Diaph Rail FWS HL-93 Interior 2034 2137 250 405 2728 Exterior 2034 2053 250 405 3837

Interior Beam – Stresses due to dead load and live load.

( )( ) ( )( )[ ]( )fbottom = −

+−

+ += −

2034 2137 1220157

250 405 08 2728 1227751

3710.

. ksi (t)

Exterior Beam – Stresses due to dead load and live load.

( )( ) ( )( )[ ]( )fbottom = −

+−

+ += −

2034 2053 1220157

250 405 08 3837 1227751

4 044.

. ksi (t)

PRELIMINARY STRAND ARRANGEMENT The development of a strand pattern is a cyclic process. Two design parameters need to be initially estimated: the total prestress losses and the eccentricity of the strand pattern at midspan. The total required prestress force can be calculated using:

Pf f

Ae

S

eten bottom

bnc

=−

−⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

1

ften = the tensile stress limit (ksi) ∆fpT = the estimated total loss in the prestressing steel stress (ksi) fpj = the stress in the prestressing steel at jacking (ksi) fpe = the effective stress in the prestressing steel, after all losses (ksi) Pe = the effective prestress force, after all losses (k) e = the eccentricity of the strand pattern (in) The concrete stress limit for tension, all loads applied, after all losses, and subjected to severe corrosion conditions, Table 5.9.4.2.2-1, is: f ften c= = =0 0948 0 0948 8 0 268. . .' ksi ∆fpT = 40 ksi (estimated) fpj = (0.75)(270) = 202.50 ksi fpe = 202.50 – 40 = 162.50 ksi Pe = (fpe)(Aps) = (162.50)(0.217) = 35.3 k (for one strand) e = -32 inches (estimated)

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 11

Page 12: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

Interior Beam ( ) ( )

( )Pe =− − −

−−⎡

⎣⎢⎤

⎦⎥

=0 268 3710

11085

3220157

13718. .

. k

The number of strands required is: 13718

35338 9

..

.=

Exterior Beam

( ) ( )( )Pe =

− − −

−−⎡

⎣⎢⎤

⎦⎥

=0 268 4 044

11085

3220157

1504 9. .

. k

The number of strands required is: 1504 9

35342 6

..

.=

Try 42 strands. The preliminary strand pattern is shown in Figure 8 and the preliminary strand profile including the eccentricities at the span tenth points is shown in Figure 9. At the midspan of the beam the distance from the bottom of the beam to the center of gravity of the prestressing strands is:

( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( )y =

+ + +=

13 2 13 4 13 6 3 842

4 29. in

The eccentricity of the prestressing strands at the midspan is: e y ybnc= − = − = −4 29 36 38 32 09. . . in At the ends of the beam the distance from the bottom of the beam to the center of gravity of the prestressing strands, with 12 strands harped at the 0.4 span point, is:

( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( )y =

+ + + + + +=

10 2 10 4 10 6 3 64 3 66 3 68 3 7042

22 00. in

The eccentricity of the prestressing strands at the ends of the beam is: e = − = −22 00 36 38 14 38. . . in PRESTRESS LOSS – LOW RELAXATION STRAND In order to check the final beam stresses, calculate the effective prestress force in the prestressing strands. The effective prestress force is the force in the prestressing strands after all prestress losses have occurred. This example assumes that the prestressing strands are jacked to an initial stress of 0.75fpu or 202.50 ksi.

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 12

Page 13: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

At beam ends At beam centerline

4 sp

a @

2"

4 sp

a @

2"

3 sp

a @

2"

Figure 7 – Strand Pattern

C. G. beam

12'-0"

10 strands 3 strands

3 strands3 strands10 strands

10 strands

3 strands

48'-0"6"

e =

-14.

38 i n

e =

- 14 .

56 i n

e =

- 18.

95 in

e =

- 23 .

33 in

e =

- 27 .

71 i n

e =

-32 .

09 i n

e =

- 32 .

09 in

centerline bearing Figure 8 – Strand Profile

GIRDER CREEP COEFFICIENTS Ψb(tf,ti) = girder creep coefficient at final time due to loading introduced at transfer per

Equation 5.4.2.3.2-1 Ψb(td,ti) = girder creep coefficient at time of deck placement due to loading introduced at

transfer per Equation 5.4.2.3.2-1 Ψb(tf,td) = girder creep coefficient at final time due to loading at deck placement per Equation

5.4.2.3.2-1 H = relative humidity (%) kvs = factor for the effect of the volume-to-surface ratio of the component kf = factor for the effect of concrete strength khc = humidity factor for creep ktd = time development factor

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 13

Page 14: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

t = maturity of concrete (Day), defined as age of concrete between time of loading for creep calculations, or end of curing for shrinkage calculations, and time being considered for analysis of creep or shrinkage effects

ti = age of concrete when load is initially applied, age at transfer (Days) td = age at deck placement (Days) tf = final age (Days) V/S = volume-to-surface ratio f'ci = specified compressive strength of concrete at time of prestressing for pretensioned

members and at time of initial loading for nonprestressed members. If concrete age at time of initial loading is unknown at design time, f'ci may be taken as 0.80 f'c (KSI)

Girder creep coefficient for final time due to loading at transfer H = 70% V/S = 5.7 in ti = 2 Days tf = 20000 days t = 20000 - 2 = 19998 days

( )( )k V Svs = − = − = ≥145 013 145 013 57 0 7090 0 0. . ( / ) . . . . . use 0.7090 ( )( )k Hhc = − = − =156 0 008 156 0 008 70 10000. . . . .

kff

ci=

+=

+=

51

51 7

0 6250' .

( )( )ktf ttd

ci=

− +

⎝⎜

⎠⎟ =

− +=

61 419998

61 4 7 199980 9984' .

( )( )( )( )( )( )ψ ( , ) . . . . . . .. .t t k k k k tf i vs hc f td i= =− −19 19 0 7090 10000 0 6250 0 9984 2 0 77460 118 0 118 = Girder creep coefficient at time of deck placement due to loading introduced at transfer td = 180 days t = 180 - 2 = 178 days

( )( )ktf ttd

ci=

− +

⎝⎜

⎠⎟ =

− +=

61 4178

61 4 7 17808436' .

( )( )( )( )( )( )ψ ( , ) . . . . . . .. .t t k k k k td i vs hc f td i= =− −19 19 0 7090 10000 0 6250 08436 2 0 65450 118 0 118 = Girder creep coefficient at final time due to loading at deck placement t = 20000 - 180 = 19820 days

( )( )ktf ttd

ci=

− +

⎝⎜

⎠⎟ =

− +=

61 419820

61 4 7 198200 9983' .

( )( )( )( )( )( )ψ ( , ) . . . . . . .. .t t k k k k tf d vs hc f td i= =− −19 19 0 7090 10000 0 6250 0 9983 180 0 45540 118 0 118 = DECK CREEP COEFFICIENTS Deck creep coefficient at final time due to loading at deck placement

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 14

Page 15: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

V/S = 5.5 in t = 20000 - 180 = 19820 days

( )( )k V Svs = − = − = ≥145 013 145 013 55 0 7350 0 0. . ( / ) . . . . . use 0.7350

kff

ci=

+=

+=

51

51 5

08333' .

( )( )ktf ttd

ci=

− +

⎝⎜

⎠⎟ =

− +=

61 419820

61 4 5 198200 9979' .

( )( )( )( )( )( )ψ ( , ) . . . . . . .. .t t k k k k tf d vs hc f td i= =− −19 19 0 7350 10000 08333 0 9979 180 0 62920 118 0 118 = TRANSFORMED SECTION COEFFICIENTS Kid = transformed section coefficient that accounts for time-dependent interaction between

concrete and bonded steel in the section being considered for time period between transfer and deck placement

Kdf = transformed section coefficient that accounts for time-dependent interaction between concrete and bonded steel in the section being considered for time period between deck placement and final time

Transformed section coefficient for time period between transfer and deck placement epg = eccentricity of strands with respect to centroid of girder e y ypg b= − = − =36 38 4 29 32 09. . . in

( )K

EE

AA

A eI

t tid

p

ci

ps

g

g pg

gb f i

=

+ +⎛

⎝⎜⎜

⎠⎟⎟ +

1

1 1 1 0 72

. ( , )ψ

( )( )( )( )( )

Kid =

+⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ +⎛

⎝⎜

⎠⎟ +

=1

1285004821

91141085

11085 32 09

7333201 0 7 0 7746

083802. .. .

.

Transformed section coefficient for time period between deck placement and final time epc = eccentricity of strands with respect to centroid of composite section Ac = area of section calculated using the net composite concrete section properties of the

girder and the deck and the deck-to-girder modular ratio Ic = moment of inertia of section calculated using the net composite concrete section

properties of the girder and the deck and the deck-to-girder modular ratio at service Ac = 1896.12 in2

Ic = 1485884 in4

e y ypc bc= − = − =5354 4 29 49 25. . . in

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 15

Page 16: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

( )K

EE

AA

A eI

t tdf

p

ci

ps

c

c pc

cb f i

=

+ +⎛

⎝⎜⎜

⎠⎟⎟ +

1

1 1 1 0 72

. ( , )ψ

( )( )( )( )( )

Kdf =

+⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ +⎛

⎝⎜

⎠⎟ +

=1

1285004821

91141896

11896 49 25

14858841 0 7 0 7746

084782. .. .

.

Exterior Beam ELASTIC SHORTENING, ∆fpES (5.9.5.2.3a) In order to calculate fcgp, the prestress force at transfer needs to be known. However, the prestress force at transfer depends on the loss that occurs at transfer: elastic shortening. The value of fcgp can be either taken as 0.90fpi or calculated using an iterative process. fcgp = sum of concrete stresses at the center of gravity of the prestressing tendons due to the

prestressing force at transfer and the self weight of the member at the sections of maximum moment (ksi)

fpt = the stress in the prestressing tendons at transfer, equal to fpj minus the loss at transfer, elastic shortening (ksi)

Pt = the prestressing force at transfer (k) For the first iteration, calculate fcgp using a stress in the prestressing steel equal to 0.90 of the stress just before transfer. Pt = (0.90)(202.50)(9.114) = 1661.0 k Mbeam = (2034)(12) = 24408 k-in

( ) ( )( )[ ]( ) ( )( )f

PA

P e yI

M yIcgp

t t beam= + + = +− −

+−

=166101085

16610 32 09 32 09733320

24408 32 09733320

2 5026. . . . .

. ksi

( )∆ fEE

fpESp

cicgp= =

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =

285004821

2 5026 14 79. . ksi

fpt = 202.50 - 14.79 = 187.71 ksi For the second iteration, calculate fcgp using a stress in the prestressing steel of 187.71 ksi. Pt = (187.71)(9.114) = 1710.8 k

( )( )[ ]( ) ( )( )fcgp = +

− −+

−=

171081085

17108 32 09 32 09733320

24408 32 09733320

2 9111. . . . .

. ksi

( )∆ fpES =⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =

285004821

2 9111 17 21. . ksi

fpt = 202.50 - 17.21 = 185.21 ksi For the third iteration, calculate fcgp using a stress in the prestressing steel of 185.21 ksi. Pt = (185.21)(9.114) = 1688.7 k

( )( )[ ]( ) ( )( )fcgp = +

− −+

−=

1688 71085

1688 7 32 09 32 09733320

24408 32 09733320

2 8597. . . . .

. ksi

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 16

Page 17: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

( )∆ fpES =⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =

285004821

2 8597 16 91. . ksi

fpt = 202.50 - 16.91 = 185.59 ksi For the fourth iteration, calculate fcgp using a stress in the prestressing steel of 185.59 ksi. Pt = (185.59)(9.114) = 1691.5 k

( )( )[ ]( ) ( )( )fcgp = +

− −+

−=

169151085

16915 32 09 32 09733320

24408 32 09733320

2 8662. . . . .

. ksi

( )∆ fpES =⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =

285004821

2 8662 16 94. . ksi

fpt = 202.50 - 16.94 = 185.56 ksi For the fifth iteration, calculate fcgp using a stress in the prestressing steel of 185.56 ksi. Pt = (185.56)(9.114) = 1691.2 k

( )( )[ ]( ) ( )( )fcgp = +

− −+

−=

169121085

16912 32 09 32 09733320

24408 32 09733320

2 8655. . . . .

. ksi

( )∆ fpES =⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =

285004821

2 8655 16 94. . ksi

LOSSES: TIME OF TRANSFER TO TIME OF DECK PLACEMENT SHRINKAGE OF GIRDER CONCRETE, ∆fpSR (5.9.5.4.2a) εbid = concrete shrinkage strain of girder between the time of transfer and deck placement

per Equation 5.4.2.3.3-1 Strain due to shrinkage khs = humidity factor for shrinkage (%)

( ) ( )( )k Hhs = − = − =2 00 0 014 2 00 0 014 70 10200. . . . . ( )( )( )( )( )ε bid vs hs f tdk k k k x= = =−0 48 10 0 7090 10200 0 6250 08436 0 00048 0 000183. . . . . . . in / in

( )( )( )∆ f E KpSR bid p id= = =ε 0 00018 28500 08380 4 30. . . ksi CREEP OF GIRDER CONCRETE, ∆fpCR (5.9.5.4.2b)

( ) ( )( )( )∆ fEE

f t t KpCRp

cicgp b d i id= =

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =ψ , . . .

285004821

2 8655 0 6545 08380 9 29 ksi.

RELAXATION OF PRESTRESSING STRANDS, ∆fpR1 (5.9.5.4.2c) fpt = stress in prestressing strands immediately after transfer, taken not less than 0.55fpy in

Equation 4 KL = 30 for low relaxation strands and 7 for other prestressing steel, unless more accurate

manufacturer's data are available The relaxation loss, ∆fpR1, may be assumed equal to 1.2 KSI for low-relaxation strands.

∆ ffK

ffpR

pt

L

pt

py1 055

1855630

18556243

055 132= −⎛

⎝⎜⎜

⎠⎟⎟ =

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ −⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =.

. .. . ksi

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 17

Page 18: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

LOSSES: TIME OF DECK PLACEMENT TO FINAL TIME SHRINKAGE OF GIRDER CONCRETE, ∆fpSD (5.9.5.4.3a) εbdf = shrinkage strain of girder between time of deck placement and final time, calculated

by Equation 5.4.2.3.3-1, as εbdf = εbif - εbidStrain due to shrinkage at final time

( )( )( )( )( )ε bif vs hs f tdk k k k x= = =−0 48 10 0 7090 10200 0 6250 0 9984 0 00048 0 000223. . . . . . . in / in ε ε εbdf bif bid= − = − =0 00022 0 00018 0 00004. . . in / in

( )( )( )∆ f E KpSD bdf p df= = =ε 0 00004 28500 08478 0 97. . . ksi CREEP OF GIRDER CONCRETE, ∆fpCD (5.9.5.4.3b) ∆fcd = change in concrete stress at centroid of prestressing strands due to long-term losses

between transfer and deck placement, combined with deck weight and superimposed loads

∆fcd can be calculated using:

( )∆ f

M yI

M M yIcd

slab rail WS comp

comp= − −

+

Mslab = (2053)(12) = 24636 k-in Mrail = (250)(12) = 3000 k-in MWS = (405)(12) = 4860 k-in y y yb= − = − = −4 29 36 38 32 09. . . in y y ycomp bc= − = − = −4 29 5354 49 25. . . in

( )( ) ( )( )∆ fcd = −

−−

+ −=

24636 32 09733320

3000 4860 49 251485884

13386. .

. ksi

( )∆ ∆fEE

f t t t t KEE

f t t KpCDp

cicgp b f i b d i df

p

ccd b f d df= − +ψ ψ ψ( , ) ( , ) ( , ) .0 0≥

( )( )( ) ( )( )( )∆ fpCD =⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ − +

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =

285004821

2 8655 0 7746 0 6545 08478285005154

13386 0 4554 08478 4 58. . . . . . . . ksi

RELAXATION OF PRESTRESSING STRANDS, ∆fpR2 (5.9.5.4.3c) ∆ ∆f fpR pR2 1 132= = . ksi SHRINKAGE OF DECK CONCRETE, ∆fpSS (5.9.5.4.3d) ∆fpSS = prestress loss due to shrinkage of deck composite section ∆fcdf = change in concrete stress at centroid of prestressing strands due to shrinkage of deck

concrete εddf = shrinkage strain of deck concrete between placement and final time per Equation

5.4.2.3.3-1 Ad = area of deck concrete Ecd = modulus of elasticity of deck concrete

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 18

Page 19: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

ed = eccentricity of deck with respect to the transformed gross composite section, taken negative in common construction

Ad = (114)(9) = 1026 in2

ed = ybc – ybdeck = 53.54 – (72 + 4.50) = -22.96 in Strain due to shrinkage

( )( )( )( )( )ε ddf vs hs f tdk k k k x= = =−0 48 10 0 7350 10200 08333 0 9979 0 00048 0 000303. . . . . . . in / in

( )∆ fA E

t t Ae e

Icdfddf d cd

d f d c

pc d

c=

++

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

εψ1 0 7

1. ( , )

( )( )( )( )( )

( )( )∆ fcdf =

+⎡

⎣⎢

⎦⎥ +

−⎡

⎣⎢

⎦⎥ = −

0 00030 1026 40741 0 7 0 4554

11896

49 25 22 961485884

0 2221.

. .. .

. ksi

( ) ( )( ) ( )( )( )∆ ∆fEE

f K t tpSSp

ccdf df b f d= + =

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ − + = −1 0 7

285005154

0 2221 08478 1 0 7 0 4554 137. ( , ) . . . . .ψ ksi

TOTAL LOSSES ∆fpLT = (∆fpSR + ∆fpCR + ∆fpR1)id + (∆fpSD + ∆fpCD + ∆fpR2 + ∆fpSS)df∆fpLT = (4.30 + 9.29 + 1.32) + (0.97 + 4.58 + 1.32 – 1.37) = 20.41 ksi ∆fpT = ∆fpLT + ∆fpES = 20.41 + 16.94 = 37.35 ksi Interior Beam ELASTIC SHORTENING, ∆fpES (5.9.5.2.3a) The loss due to elastic shortening only depends on the moment due to the member weight. Since this is the same for the interior and exterior beams, the loss due to elastic shortening is the same for both beams. ∆fpES = 16.94 ksi LOSSES: TIME OF TRANSFER TO TIME OF DECK PLACEMENT SHRINKAGE OF GIRDER CONCRETE, ∆fpSR (5.9.5.4.2a) The loss due to shrinkage depends on the relative humidity, the amount of time between the time of transfer and the time of deck placement, and the transformed section coefficient for time period between transfer and deck placement. Since these are the same for the interior and exterior beams, the loss due to shrinkage of girder concrete is the same for both beams. ∆fpSR = 4.30 ksi CREEP OF GIRDER CONCRETE, ∆fpCR (5.9.5.4.2b) The loss due to creep depends on the sum of concrete stresses at the center of gravity of the prestressing tendons due to the prestressing force at transfer and the self weight of the member at the sections of maximum moment, the amount of time between the time of transfer and the time of deck placement, and the transformed section coefficient for time period between transfer and deck placement. Since these are the same for the interior and exterior beams, the loss due to creep of girder concrete is the same for both beams. ∆fpCR = 9.29 ksi

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 19

Page 20: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

RELAXATION OF PRESTRESSING STRANDS, ∆fpR1 (5.9.5.4.2c) The loss due to relaxation of prestressing strands depends on the stress in prestressing strands immediately after transfer and the type of prestressing strands used. Since these are the same for the interior and exterior beams, the loss due to relaxation of prestressing strands is the same for both beams. ∆fpR1 = 1.32 ksi LOSSES: TIME OF DECK PLACEMENT TO FINAL TIME SHRINKAGE OF GIRDER CONCRETE, ∆fpSD (5.9.5.4.3a) The loss due to shrinkage depends on the relative humidity, the amount of time between the time of deck placement and the final time, and the transformed section coefficient for time period between deck placement and final. Since these are the same for the interior and exterior beams, the loss due to shrinkage of girder concrete is the same for both beams. ∆fpSD = 0.97 ksi CREEP OF GIRDER CONCRETE, ∆fpCD (5.9.5.4.3b) Mslab = (2137)(12) = 25644 k-in

( )( ) ( )( )∆ fcd = −

−−

+ −=

25644 32 09733320

3000 4860 49 251485884

13827. .

. ksi

( )( )( ) ( )( )( )∆ fpCD =⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ − +

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =

285004821

2 8655 0 7746 0 6545 08478285005154

13827 0 4554 08478 4 68. . . . . . . . ksi

RELAXATION OF PRESTRESSING STRANDS, ∆fpR2 (5.9.5.4.3c) The loss due to relaxation of prestressing strands between the time of deck placement and the final time is equal to the loss between the transfer time and the time of deck placement. Since these are the same for the interior and exterior beams, the loss due to relaxation of prestressing strands is the same for both beams. ∆fpR2 = 1.32 ksi SHRINKAGE OF DECK CONCRETE, ∆fpSS (5.9.5.4.3d) The loss due to shrinkage of the deck concrete depends on the change in concrete stress at centroid of prestressing strands due to shrinkage of deck concrete, section properties, the amount of time between the time of deck placement and the final time, and the transformed section coefficient for time period between deck placement and final. Since these are the same for the interior and exterior beams, the loss due to shrinkage of deck concrete is the same for both beams. ∆fpSS = – 1.37 ksi TOTAL LOSSES ∆fpLT = (∆fpSR + ∆fpCR + ∆fpR1)id + (∆fpSD + ∆fpCD + ∆fpR2 + ∆fpSS)df∆fpLT = (4.30 + 9.29 + 1.32) + (0.97 + 4.68 + 1.32 – 1.37) = 20.51 ksi ∆fpT = ∆fpLT + ∆fpES = 20.51 + 16.94 = 37.45 ksi

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 20

Page 21: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

STRAND ARRANGEMENT Now that the total loss in the prestressing steel stress has been calculated, check if the preliminary strand pattern and eccentricity are still valid. The calculated effective stress in the prestressing steel is: fpe = 202.50 – 37.45 = 165.05 ksi for the interior beam fpe = 202.50 – 37.35 = 165.15 ksi for the exterior beam Interior Beam

( ) ( )( )Pe =

− − −

−−⎡

⎣⎢⎤

⎦⎥

=0 268 37101

108532 09

20157

1369 3. .

.. k

The effective prestress force in one strand is: (165.05)(0.217) = 35.8 k The number of strands required is: 1369 3

35838 2

..

.=

Exterior Beam

( ) ( )( )Pe =

− − −

−−⎛

⎝⎜⎞⎠⎟

=0 268 4 0441

108532 09

20157

1502 2. .

.. k

The effective prestress force in one strand is: (165.15)(0.217) = 35.8 k The number of strands required is: 1502 2

35842 0

..

.=

The preliminary strand arrangement with 42 strands is still good. SERVICE LIMIT STATE Now that the release and effective prestress forces are known, the critical beam stresses can be checked for Service I and III Limit States. Check the stresses in the interior and exterior beams for the release and service conditions. The release condition includes loads due the release or transfer of the prestress force and the self-weight of the beam. The service condition includes loads due to the effective prestress force, dead load (beam, concrete deck slab, rails, diaphragms, and future wearing surface allowance, and live load. Calculate the beam stress limits for two conditions: temporary before losses for the release condition and after all losses for the service condition. For the temporary before losses condition (5.9.4.1): Tension: 0 0948 0 0948 7 0 251. . .'fci = = ksi > 0.2 ksi, use 0.2 ksi Compression: ( )( )0 60 0 60 7 4 2. . .'fci = = ksiAt the service limit state after all losses (5.9.4.2): Tension, severe corrosion conditions:

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 21

Page 22: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

0 0948 0 0948 8 0 268. . .'fc = = ksi Compression: Due to effective prestress and permanent loads: ( )( )0 45 0 45 8 36. . .'fc = = ksi Due to live load and one-half the sum of effective prestress and permanent loads: ( )( )0 40 0 40 8 32. . .'fc = = ksi Due to effective prestress, permanent loads, and transient loads: 0 6. 'ϕ w cf The reduction factor, φw, is equal to 1.0 if the flange slenderness ratio is not greater than

15. The slenderness ratio is the ratio of the flange width to depth:

flange widthflange depth

= =114

912 7.

Since this value is not greater than 15, φw is equal to 1.0 and the stress limit is: ( )( )( )0 6 0 6 10 8 4 8. . . .'ϕ w cf = = ksiThe stress limits for the concrete deck slab at the service limit state: Compression: Due to effective prestress and permanent loads: ( )( )0 45 0 45 5 2 25. . .'fc = = ksi Due to effective prestress, permanent loads, and transient loads: ( )( )( )0 6 0 6 10 5 30. . . .'ϕ w cf = = ksiThe total area of prestressing steel, the initial or transfer prestressing force, and the effective prestressing forces are: Aps = (0.217)(42) = 9.114 in2

Pt = (fpt)(Aps) = (185.56)(9.114) = 1691.2 k Pe = (fpe)(Aps) = (165.05)(9.114) = 1504.3 k for the interior beam Pe = (fpe)(Aps) = (165.15)(9.114) = 1505.2 k for the exterior beam STRESSES AT TRANSFER The release stresses are the same for the interior and exterior beams and can be calculated using:

fPA

P eS

MSbottom

t t

bnc

beam

bnc= − − (Service I Limit State)

fPA

P eS

MStop

t t

tnc

beam

tnc= + + (Service I Limit State)

At the harp point due to the initial prestress force and the beam dead load Mbeam = (1986.7)(12) = 23840 k-in (for 121 foot casting length)

( )( )fbottom = −

−− =

169121085

16912 32 0920157

2384020157

3068. . .

. ksi (c)

( )( )ftop = +

−+ =

169121085

16912 32 0920587

2384020587

0 081. . .

. ksi (c)

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 22

Page 23: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

At end of the transfer length due to the initial prestress force and the beam dead load The transfer length is 60 strand diameters or 36 inches. Therefore, the end of the transfer length is 36 inches from the end of the beam or 30 inches from the centerline of bearing, the 0.0208 point. The eccentricity of the prestressing force is: e = 14.56 + (18.95 – 14.56)(0.208) = 15.47 in Mbeam = (200.0)(12) = 2400 k-in (for 121 foot casting length)

( )( )fbottom = −

−− =

169121085

16912 154720157

240020157

2 738. . .

. ksi (c)

( )( )ftop = +

−+ =

169121085

16912 154720587

240020587

0 404. . .

. ksi (c)

STRESSES AT SERVICE CONDITION The service stresses, assuming tension at the bottom beam fibers, can be calculated using:

fPA

P eS

M MS

M M MSbottom

e e

bnc

beam slab

bnc

rail WS LL

bc= − −

+−

+ + 08. (Service III Limit State)

fPA

P eS

M MS

M M MStop

e e

tnc

beam slab

tnc

rail WS LL

tc= + +

++

+ + (Service I Limit State)

Exterior Beam At end of the transfer length due to the effective prestress force and dead load Mbeam = (166.0)(12) = 1992 k-in Mslab = (164.2)(12) = 1970 k-in Mrail = (20.4)(12) = 245 k-in MWS = (33.0)(12) = 396 k-in

( )( )fbottom = −

−−

+−

+=

150521085

15052 154720157

1992 197020157

245 39627751

2 323. . .

. ksi (c)

( )( )ftop = +

−+

++

+=

150521085

15052 154720587

1992 197020587

245 39680503

0 457. . .

. ksi (c)

At midspan due to the effective prestress force and dead load

( )( )fbottom = −

−−

+−

+=

150521085

15052 32 0920157

24408 2463620157

3000 486027751

1067. . .

. ksi (c)

( )( )ftop = +

−+

++

+=

150521085

15052 32 0920587

24408 2463620587

3000 486080503

1521. . .

. ksi (c)

At midspan due to the effective prestress force, dead load, and live load MLL = (3837)(12) = 46044 k-in

( )( ) ( )( )fbottom = −

−−

+−

+ += −

150521085

15052 32 0920157

24408 2463620157

3000 4860 08 4604427751

0 260. . . .

. ksi (t)

( )( )ftop = +

−+

++

+ +=

150521085

15052 32 0920587

24408 2463620587

3000 4860 4604480503

2 093. . .

. ksi (c)

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 23

Page 24: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

At midspan due to the live load and one-half the effective prestress force and dead load ( )( )

ftop = +−

++

++⎡

⎣⎢

⎦⎥ + =

12

150521085

15052 32 0920587

24408 2463620587

3000 486080503

4604480503

1332. . .

. ksi (c)

Interior Beam At end of the transfer length due to the effective prestress force and dead load Mslab = (167.7)(12) = 2012 k-in

( )( )fbottom = −

−−

+−

+=

1504 31085

1504 3 154720157

1992 201220157

245 39627751

2 319. . .

. ksi (c)

( )( )ftop = +

−+

++

+=

1504 31085

1504 3 154720587

1992 201220587

245 39680503

0 459. . .

. ksi (c)

At midspan due to the effective prestress force and dead load

( )( )fbottom = −

−−

+−

+=

1504 31085

1504 3 32 0920157

24408 2564420157

3000 486027751

1015. . .

. ksi (c)

( )( )ftop = +

−+

++

+=

1504 31085

1504 3 32 0920587

24408 2564420587

3000 486080503

1571. . .

. ksi (c)

At midspan due to the effective prestress force, dead load, and live load MLL = (2728)(12) = 32736 k-in

( )( ) ( )( )fbottom = −

−−

+−

+ +=

1504 31085

1504 3 32 0920157

24408 2564420157

3000 4860 08 3273627751

0 071. . . .

. ksi (c)

( )( )ftop = +

−+

++

+ +=

1504 31085

1504 3 32 0920587

24408 2564420587

3000 4860 3273680503

1977. . .

. ksi (c)

At the midspan due to the live load and one-half the effective prestress force and dead load

( )( )ftop = +

−+

++

+⎡

⎣⎢

⎦⎥ + =

12

1504 31085

1504 3 32 0920587

24408 2564420587

3000 486080503

3273680503

1192. . .

. ksi (c)

Check the stress at the top fibers of the deck slab, interior and exterior beams, at midspan for the concrete compression limit. The composite section properties and loads are used. The service stresses, assuming compression in the extreme top slab fibers, can be calculated using:

fM M M

Sslab toprail WS LL

slab top=

+ + (Service I Limit State)

Interior Beam At midspan due to the composite dead load

fslab top =+

=3000 4860

684430115. ksi (c)

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 24

Page 25: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

At midspan due to the composite dead load and live load

fslab top =+ +

=3000 4860 32736

684430593. ksi (c)

Exterior Beam At midspan due to the composite dead load

fslab top =+

=3000 4860

684430115. ksi (c)

At midspan due to the composite dead load and live load

fslab top =+ +

=3000 4860 46044

684430 788. ksi (c)

Table 5 – Stress Summary, Interior and Exterior Beams

Maximum Limit BEAM STRESSES

Release Tension none 0.200 ksi Compression 3.068 ksi 4.2 ksi

Effective prestress, dead loads Tension none 0.268 ksi Compression 2.323 ksi 3.6 ksi

Effective prestress, dead loads, live load Tension 0.260 ksi 0.268 ksi Compression 2.093 ksi 4.8 ksi

Live load and half the sum of effective prestress and dead loads Compression 1.332 ksi 3.2 ksi

DECK SLAB STRESS Composite dead loads

Compression 0.115 ksi 2.25 ksi Composite dead loads, live load

Compression 0.788 ksi 3.0 ksi FATIGUE LIMIT STATE (5.5.3.1) For fully prestressed concrete components there is no need to check fatigue when the tensile stress in the extreme fiber at the Service III Limit State after all losses meets the tensile stress limits. Since this is the case, fatigue does not need to be checked. STRENGTH LIMIT STATE The Strength Limit State includes checks on the nominal flexural resistance and the amount of prestressed and non-prestressed reinforcement. For practical design the rectangular stress distribution can be used.

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 25

Page 26: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

NOMINAL FLEXURAL RESISTANCE – MIDSPAN The beams do not have any non-prestressed tension reinforcement or compression reinforcement. The stress block factor is based on the compressive strength of the deck concrete, assumes that the neutral axis remains within the deck slab. Since this is a strength limit state check, the width of the compression flange, b, is not reduced. dp = the distance from the extreme compression fiber to the centroid of the prestressing

tendons (in) β1 = the stress block factor 1. Calculate the factored moments for the Strength I Limit State, Mu Mu = (1.25)(2034 + 2053 + 250) + (1.5)(405) + (1.75)(3837) = 12744 k-ft (exterior beam) Mu = (1.25)(2034 + 2137 + 250) + (1.5)(405) + (1.75)(2728) = 10908 k-ft (interior beam) 2. Calculate the depth of the compression block (5.7.3.1.1) b = 114 inches dp = e + yt + tslab = 32.09 + 35.62 + 9 = 76.71 in

k = 0.28 for low relaxation strand β1 = 0.80 for the 5 ksi deck concrete In order to calculate the depth of the compression block, a, first calculate the depth to the

neutral axis, c, assuming rectangular section behavior.

( )( )

( )( )( )( ) ( )( )c

A f A f A f

f b kAfd

ps pu s y s y

c pspu

p

=+ −

+=

+ −

+⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟=

' '

'.

.

. . . ..

.085

9114 270 0 0

085 5 080 114 0 28 9114270

76 71

6 201β

in

Since the depth to the neutral axis is less than the slab thickness, the assumed rectangular section behavior is correct. The depth of the compression block is:

a = β1c = (0.80)(6.20) = 4.96 in 3. Calculate the stress in the prestressing steel at the nominal flexural resistance (5.7.3.1.1) For components with bonded tendons:

( ) ( )f f kc

dps pup

= −⎛

⎝⎜⎜

⎠⎟⎟ = −

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

⎣⎢

⎦⎥ =1 270 1 0 28

6 2076 71

26389...

. ksi

4. Calculate the factored flexural resistance (5.7.3.2.1)

( )( )M A f da

n ps ps p= −⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ = −

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =

29114 26389 76 71

4 962

112

14878. . ..

k - ft

Mr = φMn = (1.0)(14878) = 14878 k-ft > 12744 k-ft for the exterior beam O.K. > 10908 k-ft for the interior beam O.K. REINFORCEMENT LIMITS – MIDSPAN Check the reinforcement limits, maximum and minimum. The maximum amount of prestressed and non-prestressed reinforcement (5.7.3.3.1) should satisfy:

c

de≤ 0 42.

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 26

Page 27: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

c = the distance from the extreme compression fiber to the neutral axis (in) de = the corresponding effective depth from the extreme compression fiber to the centroid of

the tensile force in the tensile reinforcement (in) ds = the distance from the extreme compression fiber to the centroid of the non-prestressed

tensile reinforcement (in)

( )( )( )( )( )d

A f d A f dA f A feps ps p s y s

ps ps s y=

+

+=

++

=9114 26389 76 71 0

9114 26389 076 71

. . .. .

. in

cde

= = <6 2076 71

0 08 0 42..

. . O.K.

The minimum amount of prestressed and non-prestressed reinforcement is the amount needed to develop a factored flexural resistance, Mr, equal to the lesser of the following (5.7.3.3.2): 1.2 Mcr 1.33 times the factored moments (Strength Limit State, Mu) The cracking moment, Mcr, may be taken as:

( )M S f f MSS

S fcr c r cpe dncc

ncc r= + − −

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ ≤1

fr = the modulus of rupture (ksi) fcpe = the compressive stress in the concrete due to the effective prestress forces only (after

allowance for all prestress losses) at the extreme fiber of the section where tensile stress is caused by externally applied loads (ksi)

Sc = the section modulus for the extreme fiber of the composite section where tensile stress is caused by externally applied loads (in3)

Snc = the section modulus for the extreme fiber of the monolithic or non-composite section where tensile stress is caused by externally applied loads (in3)

Mdnc = the total unfactored dead load moment acting on the monolithic or non-composite section (k-ft)

Mu = the factored moment, Strength Limit State (k-ft) Exterior Beam Mdnc = 2034 + 2053 = 4087 k-ft = 49044 k-in

( )( )fcpe = −

−=

150521085

15052 32 0920157

37836. . .

. ksi

( )( ) ( )Mcr = + − −⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

⎣⎢

⎦⎥⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =27751 0 6788 37836 49044

2775120157

11

128780. . k - ft

Scfr = (27751)(0.6788) = 18837 k-in = 1570 k-ft Since Mcr is to be less than or equal to Scfr, 1.2 Mcr = (1.2)(1570) = 1884 k-ft 1.33 Mu = (1.33)(12744) = 16950 k-ft The lesser of these two values is 1884 k-ft and the factored flexural resistance is 17382 k-ft. 17382 k-ft > 1884 k-ft O.K.

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 27

Page 28: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

Interior Beam Mdnc = 2034 + 2137 = 4171 k-ft = 50052 k-in f fr c= = =0 24 0 24 8 0 6788. . .' ksi (5.4.2.6)

( )( )f

PA

P eScpe

e e

nc= − = −

−=

1504 31085

1504 3 330920157

37813. . .

. ksi

( )( ) ( )Mcr = + − −⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

⎣⎢

⎦⎥⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =27751 0 6788 37813 50052

2775120157

11

128743. . k - ft

Scfr = (27751)(0.6788) = 18837 k-in = 1570 k-ft Since Mcr is to be less than or equal to Scfr, 1.2 Mcr = (1.2)(1570) = 1884 k-ft 1.33 Mu = (1.33)(10908) = 14508 k-ft The lesser of these two values is 1884 k-ft and the factored flexural resistance is 17382 k-ft. 17382 k-ft > 1884 k-ft O.K. PRETENSIONED ANCHORAGE ZONE (5.10.10.1) The bursting resistance provided by vertical reinforcement in the ends of pretensioned beams at the service limit state should resist a force not less than 4% of the prestress force at transfer. The total reinforcement is located within a distance h/4 from the end of the beam. The stress in the steel, fs, is not to exceed 20 ksi. Bursting resistance provided by the vertical reinforcement: Pr = fsAs As = the total area of vertical reinforcement located within the distance h/4 from the end of the

beam (in2) h = the overall depth of the precast member Pt = the prestressing force at transfer (k) Pr = (Pt)(0.04) = (1691.2)(0.04) = 67.65 k h = 72 inches h4

724

18 0= = . in

Solve for the area of vertical reinforcement required:

APfs

r

s= = =

67 4520

338.

. in2

Using pairs of No. 4 bars, As = 0.40 in2 and the number of pairs of bars required is: 3380 40

85..

.=

With 9 pairs of No. 4 bars: As = (9)(0.40) = 3.60 in2

DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSFER LENGTH The development length, ld, in prestressing strand is the length of strand over which there is a gradual buildup of strand force, Figure 9. It consists of two components, the transfer and the

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 28

Page 29: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

flexural bond lengths. The prestress force varies linearly over the transfer length. At the end of the transfer length the stress in the strand is the effective prestress stress. The prestress force then varies in a parabolic manner and reaches the tensile strength of the strand at the end of the development length. The transfer and development lengths are calculated. The flexural bond length can be calculated by taking the difference between the development and transfer lengths. This example calculates the development lengths using the stress in the prestressing steel previously calculated at midspan. The transfer length only depends on the strand diameter and therefore is the same for the interior and exterior beams, sixty strand diameters. The development length for bonded strands:

l d ps pek f f d≥ −⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

23 b

db = the nominal strand diameter (in) fps = the average stress in the prestressing steel at the time for which the nominal resistance of

the member is required (ksi) k = 1.6 for precast prestressed beams

f

f

ld

ps

pe

Distance from free end of strand

Stee

l stre

ss

transferlength

Figure 9 – Development Length

TRANSFER LENGTH (5.11.4.1) 60 db = (60)(0.6) = 36 in DEVELOPMENT LENGTH (5.11.4.2) Exterior Beam

( ) ( ) ( )k f f dps pe b−⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ = −

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

⎣⎢

⎦⎥ =

23

16 2638923

16015 0 6 1508. . . . . in

Interior Beam

( ) ( ) ( )k f f dps pe b−⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ = −

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

⎣⎢

⎦⎥ =

23

16 2638923

160 05 0 6 150 9. . . . . in

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 29

Page 30: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

WEB SHEAR DESIGN (5.8) Determine the required transverse reinforcement spacing at the critical section and at the inside edge of the elastomeric bearing. Verify that the longitudinal reinforcement on the flexural tension side of the member is properly proportioned at these locations. The calculation of the critical section is an iterative process because the criteria used to calculate the location depends on the value of the effective shear depth at the location of the critical section. Vc = the nominal shear resistance of the concrete (k) Vp = the component in the direction of the applied shear of the effective prestressing force (k) Vn = the nominal shear resistance of the section (k) Vs = the nominal shear resistance of the shear reinforcing steel (k) dv = the effective shear depth taken as the distance, measured perpendicular to the neutral

axis, between the resultants of the tensile and compressive forces due to flexure (in) s = the spacing of the shear reinforcement (in) β = the factor indicating the ability of diagonally cracked concrete to transmit tension θ = the angle of inclination of the diagonal compressive stresses (deg) bv = the effective web width, taken as the minimum web width within the depth dv (in) h = the overall depth of the member Av = the area of shear reinforcement within a distance s (in2) Ac = the area of concrete on the flexural tension side of the member (in2) Exterior Beam 1. Calculate the effective shear depth, dv (5.8.2.9) One way to calculate the effective shear depth is to calculate the depth of the

compression block and then the distance between the middle of the compression block and the center of gravity of all the tensile reinforcement. Since non-prestressed reinforcement is not used, de is equal to dp. Starting with an estimated location of the critical section at the 0.05 point:

e = 14.56 + (18.95 – 14.56)(0.5) = 16.76 in de = dp = e + yt + tslab = 16.76 + 35.62 + 9 = 61.38 in Assuming rectangular section behavior:

( )( )

( )( )( )( ) ( )( )c

A f A f A f

f b kAfd

ps pu s y s y

c pspu

p

=+ −

+=

+ −

+⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟=

' '

'.

.

. . . ..

.085

9114 270 0 0

085 5 080 114 0 28 9114270

6138

6171β

in

Since the depth to the neutral axis is less than the slab thickness, the assumed rectangular section behavior is correct. The depth of the compression block is:

a = β1c =(0.80)(6.17) = 4.94 in The calculated effective shear depth is:

d da

v e= − = − =2

61384 94

258 91.

.. in

But dv does not need to be less than the greater of: 0.9de = (0.9)(61.38) = 55.24 in 0.72h = (0.72)(81) = 58.32 in Since the calculated value is greater than both of these values, dv = 58.91 in

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 30

Page 31: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

2. Calculate the location of the critical section (5.8.3.2) The critical section is located a distance dv from the face of the support. Since the

location of the critical section is measured from the face of the support, add a distance equal to one-half the width of the bearing pad or 4 inches. Therefore, the distance from the center of bearing to the critical section is:

58.91 + 4.00 = 62.91 in (~ 0.044 point) Since the revised location of the critical section is not close enough to the previous value,

repeat. 3. Calculate the effective shear depth, dv (5.8.2.9) At the revised estimated location of the critical section, the 0.044 point: e = 14.56 + (18.95 – 14.56)(0.44) = 16.49 in de = dp = e + yt + tslab = 16.49 + 35.62 + 9 = 61.11 in Assuming rectangular section behavior:

( )( )

( )( )( )( ) ( )( )c

A f A f A f

f b kAfd

ps pu s y s y

c pspu

p

=+ −

+=

+ −

+⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟=

' '

'.

.

. . . ..

.085

9114 270 0 0

085 5 080 114 0 28 91142706111

6171β

in

Since the depth to the neutral axis is less than the slab thickness, the assumed rectangular section behavior is correct. The depth of the compression block is:

a = β1c =(0.80)(6.17) = 4.94 in The calculated effective shear depth is:

d da

v e= − = − =2

61114 94

258 64.

.. in

But dv does not need to be less than the greater of: 0.9de = (0.9)(61.11) = 55.00 in 0.72h = 58.32 in Since the calculated value is greater than both of these values, dv = 58.64 in 4. Calculate the location of the critical section (5.8.3.2) The critical section is located a distance dv from the face of the support. Therefore, the

distance from the center of bearing to the critical section is: 58.64 + 4.00 = 62.64 in (~ 0.044 point) Since the revised location of the critical section is close enough to the previous value,

continue with the next step. 5. Calculate the factored loads for the Strength I Limit State

Table 6 – Beam Moments and Shears, 0.044 Point Dead Load

DC DW Load Beam Slab/Diaph Rail FWS

Live Load plus Dynamic Load

Allowance Moment, k-ft 342 339 42 68 663

Shear, k 61.8 61.3 7.6 12.3 125.4 Mu = (1.25)(342 + 339 + 42) + (1.5)(68) + (1.75)(663) = 2166 k-ft Vu = (1.25)(61.8 + 61.3 + 7.6) + (1.5)(12.3) + (1.75)(125.4) = 401.3 k

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 31

Page 32: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

Nu = 0 k 6. Calculate the prestress tendon shear component ψ = the inclination of the harped strands (deg)

ψ =⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =−tan .1 62

5826 08o

Vp = (Aps)(fpe)(sinψ) = (12)(0.217)(160.15)(0.1059) = 44.16 k Since the critical section is located past the transfer length, use the full effective stress. 7. Calculate the shear stress in the concrete and the shear stress ratio (5.8.2.9) bv = 8 inches The shear stress in the concrete is:

( )( )

( )( )( )vV V

b duu p

v v=

−=

−=

ϕ

ϕ4013 0 9 4416

0 9 8 58 640856

. . .. .

. ksi

The shear stress ratio is:

vf

u

c'

..= =

08568

0107

8. Calculate the strain in reinforcement on the flexural tension side of the member (5.8.3.4.2)

Aps = the area of prestressing steel on the flexural tension side of the member (in2) As = the area of non-prestressed steel on the flexural tension side of the member at the

section under investigation (in2) fpo = a parameter taken as the modulus of elasticity of prestressing tendons multiplied

by the locked in difference in strain between the prestressing tendons and the surrounding concrete, for usual levels of prestressing, 0.70 fpu will be appropriate

Mu = the factored moment not to be taken as less than Vudv Aps = (0.217)(30) = 6.510 in2 (30 strands) As = 0 in2

Ac = 584 in2

fpo = (0.7)(270) = 189 ksi Vudv = (401.3)(58.64) = 23532 k-in = 1961 k-ft

Since this value is less than the actual applied factored moment, use the actual applied factored moment. Assume an initial value for θ of 23.7˚, which is based on the shear stress ratio of 0.107 and an assumed value for εx of zero. The initial value of εx should not be taken greater than 0.001.

( )

( )εθ

x

u

vu u p ps

s s ps ps

Md

N V V A f

E A E A=

+ + − −

+

05 05

2

. . cot po

( )( )( )( )( ) ( )( )

( ) ( )( )[ ]ε x =+ + − −

+= −

2166 1258 64

0 05 4013 4416 237 6510 189

2 0 28500 651010250.

. . . cot . .

.. x 10 in / in-3

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 32

Page 33: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

Since εx is negative:

( )

( )εθ

x

u

vu u p ps

c c s s ps ps

Md

N V V A f

E A E A E A=

+ + − −

+ +

05 05

2

. . cot po

( )( )( )( )( ) ( )( )

( ) ( )( ) ( )( )[ ]ε x =+ + − −

+ += −

2166 1258 64

0 05 4013 4416 237 6510 189

2 5154 584 0 28500 65100 0595.

. . . cot . .

.. x 10 in / in-3

Use the shear stress ratio and εx to obtain θ from Table 5.8.3.4.2-1, 22.8˚. Since this does not agree with the initial value, repeat.

( )( )( )( )( ) ( )( )

( ) ( )( )[ ]ε x =+ + − −

+= −

2166 1258 64

0 05 4013 4416 22 8 6510 189

2 0 28500 65100 9765.

. . . cot . .

.. x 10 in / in-3

Since the revised εx is negative:

( )( )( )( )( ) ( )( )

( ) ( )( ) ( )( )[ ]ε x =+ + − −

+ += −

2166 1258 64

0 05 4013 4416 22 8 6510 189

2 5154 584 0 28500 65100 0567.

. . . cot . .

.. x 10 in / in-3

Use the shear stress ratio and εx to obtain θ, 22.8˚. Since this agrees with the previous value, continue.

9. Obtain the final theta and beta factors from Table 5.8.3.4.2-1 θ = 22.8

β = 2.94 10. Calculate the shear resistance provided by the concrete, Vc (5.8.3.3) ( )( )( )( )( )V f b dc c v v= = =0 0316 0 0316 2 94 8 8 58 64 12327. . . .'β k. 11. Check if the region requires transverse reinforcement (5.8.2.4)

Transverse reinforcement is required if: Vu > 0.5φ(Vc + Vp) 0.5φ(Vc + Vp) = (0.5)(0.9)(123.27 + 44.16) = 75.34 k Since Vu, 401.3 k, is greater than this value, transverse reinforcement is required 12. Calculate the shear resistance that the transverse reinforcement needs to provide, Vs

VV

V Vsu

c p= − − = − − =ϕ

40130 9

12327 4416 278 46.

.. . . k

13. Calculate the required transverse reinforcement spacing Av = 0.40 in2 (2 No. 4 bars)

( )( )( )( )

sA f d

Vv y v

s= = =

cot . . cot ..

.θ 0 40 60 58 64 22 8

278 4612 0 in

Based on reinforcement placed at 90˚ to the longitudinal axis of the beam

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 33

Page 34: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

14. Calculate the maximum allowable spacing of the transverse reinforcement (5.8.2.7) ( )( )0125 0125 8 1000. . .'fc = = ksi Since v fcu 0.856 ksi= < 0125. '

s dvmax . .≤ ≤08 24 0 in 0.8dv = (0.8)(58.64) = 46.9 in > 24.0 in Therefore, the maximum spacing is 24 inches. Use 2 No. 4 bars at a 12-inch spacing. 15. Check if the minimum amount of transverse reinforcement is provided (5.8.2.5)

( )( ) ( )( )A f

b sfv cv

y= =

⎣⎢

⎦⎥ =0 0316 0 0316 8

8 1260

014. .' in2.

Vp

Since the transverse reinforcement provided, 0.40 in2, is greater than this, the minimum transverse reinforcement provision is satisfied.

16. Check the nominal shear resistance (5.8.3.3) The nominal shear resistance is the lesser of: V f b dn c v v≤ +0 25. '

Vc + Vs + Vp ( )( )( )( )

VA f d

ssv y v

= = =cot . . cot .

.θ 0 40 60 58 64 22 8

12279 00 k

( )( )( )( )0 25 0 25 8 8 58 64 4416 982 40. . . .'f b d Vc v v p+ = + = k. Vc + Vs + Vp = 123.27 + 279.00 + 44.16 = 446.43 k The lesser of these two values is 446.43 k and the factored shear resistance is: Vr = φVn = (0.9)(446.43) = 401.79 k > 401.3 k O.K. 17. Check the longitudinal reinforcement requirement (5.8.3.5) At each section the tensile capacity of the longitudinal reinforcement on the flexural

tension side of the member shall be proportioned to satisfy:

A f A fMd

N VV Vs y ps ps

u

v

u us p+ ≥ + + − −

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

ϕ ϕ ϕθ05 05. . cot

Any lack of full development shall be accounted for. Aps = the area of prestressing steel on the flexural tension side of the member (in2) As = the area on non-prestressed steel on the flexural tension side of the member (in2)

Vs = the shear resistance provided by the transverse reinforcement at the section under investigation, given by Equation 5.8.3.3-4, except Vs shall not be taken as greater

than Vu

ϕ

Consider the lack of full development of the prestressing steel using the plot of the stress in the prestressing steel versus the distance from the end of the strand. At the end of the transfer length, 36 inches, the stress in the prestressing strand is fpe, 160.2 ksi. At the end

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 34

Page 35: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

of the development length, 151 inches, the stress in the prestressing strand, fps, is 263.9 ksi. Using a straight-line interpolation between the end of the transfer length and the development length the stress in the prestressing strand at 68 inches from the end of the beam is approximately:

( )fps ≈ +−−

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ − =160 2

2639 160 2151 36

68 36 189.. .

ksi

Calculate the tensile capacity provided by the longitudinal reinforcement: Asfy + Apsfps = 0 + (6.510)(189) = 1230 k Calculate the required tensile force where Vs is not to be greater than:

Vu

ϕ= =

40130 9

44589.

.. k

Since the nominal shear resistance provide, 279.00 k, is less than this value, use the nominal shear resistance provided.

( )( )( )( ) ( )( ) ( )A f A fs y ps ps+ ≥ + + − −

⎡⎣⎢

⎤⎦⎥

=2166 1258 64 10

040130 9

05 279 00 4416 22 8 1067. .

..

. . . cot . k

Since 1230 k > 1067 k O.K. Interior Beam 1. Calculate the effective shear depth, dv (5.8.2.9) Starting with an estimated location of the critical section at the 0.05 point: e = 16.76 in de = dp = 61.38 in Assuming rectangular section behavior:

( )( )

( )( )( )( ) ( )( )c =

+ −

+⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟=

9114 270 0 0

085 5 080 114 0 28 9114270

6138

617.

. . . ..

. in

Since the depth to the neutral axis is less than the slab thickness, the assumed rectangular section behavior is correct. The depth of the compression block is:

a = β1c = (0.80)(6.17) = 4.94 in The calculated effective depth is:

dv = − =61384 94

258 91.

.. in

But dv does not need to be less than the greater of: 0.9de = (0.9)(61.38) = 55.24 in 0.72h = 58.32 in Since the calculated value is greater than both of these values, dv = 58.91 in 2. Calculate the location of the critical section (5.8.3.2) The critical section is located a distance dv from the face of the support. Therefore, the

distance from the center of bearing to the critical section is: 58.91 + 4.00 = 62.91 in (~ 0.044 point) Since the revised location of the critical section is not close enough to the previous value,

repeat.

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 35

Page 36: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

3. Calculate the effective shear depth, dv (5.8.2.9) At the revised estimated location of the critical section, the 0.044 point: e = 14.56 + (18.95 – 14.56)(0.44) = 16.49 in de = dp = e + yt + tslab = 16.49 + 35.62 + 9 = 61.11 in Assuming rectangular section behavior:

( )( )

( )( )( )( ) ( )( )c

A f A f A f

f b kAfd

ps pu s y s y

c pspu

p

=+ −

+=

+ −

+⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟=

' '

'.

.

. . . ..

.085

9114 270 0 0

085 5 080 114 0 28 91142706111

6171β

in

Since the depth to the neutral axis is less than the slab thickness, the assumed rectangular section behavior is correct. The depth of the compression block is:

a = β1c =(0.80)(6.17) = 4.94 in The calculated effective shear depth is:

d da

v e= − = − =2

61114 94

258 64.

.. in

But dv does not need to be less than the greater of: 0.9de = (0.9)(61.11) = 55.00 in

0.72h = 58.32 in Since the calculated value is greater than both of these values, dv = 58.64 in 4. Calculate the location of the critical section (5.8.3.2) The critical section is located a distance dv from the face of the support. Therefore, the

distance from the center of bearing to the critical section is: 58.64 + 4.00 = 62.64 in (~ 0.044 point) Since the revised location of the critical section is close enough to the previous value,

continue with the next step. 5. Calculate the factored loads for the Strength I Limit State

Table 7 – Beam Moments and Shears, 0.044 Point Dead Load

DC DW Load Beam Slab/Diaph Rail FWS

Live Load plus Dynamic Load

Allowance Moment, k-ft 342 346 42 68 472

Shear, k 61.8 62.7 7.6 12.3 110.5 Mu = (1.25)(342 + 346 + 42) + (1.5)(68) + (1.75)(472) = 1841 k-ft Vu = (1.25)(61.8 + 62.7 + 7.6) + (1.5)(12.3) + (1.75)(110.5) = 377.0 k Nu = 0 k 6. Calculate the prestress tendon shear component Vp = (Aps)(fpe)(sinψ) = (12)(0.217)(160.05)(0.1059) = 44.14 k Since the critical section is located past the transfer length, use the full effective stress. 7. Calculate the shear stress in the concrete and the shear stress ratio (5.8.2.9) The shear stress in the concrete is:

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 36

Page 37: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

( )( )

( )( )( )vu =−

=377 0 0 9 4414

0 9 8 58 640 799

. . .. .

. ksi

The shear stress ratio is:

vf

u

c'

..= =

0 7998

0100

8. Calculate the strain reinforcement on the flexural tension side of the member (5.8.3.4.2) Vudv = (377.0)(58.64) = 22107 k-in = 1842 k-ft

Since this value is greater than the actual applied factored moment, use this value. Assume an initial value for θ of 22.5˚, which is based on the shear stress ratio of 0.100 and an assumed value for εx of zero.

( )( )( )( )( ) ( )( )

( ) ( )( )[ ]ε x =+ − −

+= −

1842 1258 64

05 377 0 4414 22 5 6510 189

2 0 28500 651012172.

. . . cot . .

.. x 10 in / in-3

Since εx is negative:

( )( )( )( )( ) ( )( )

( ) ( )( ) ( )( )[ ]ε x =+ + − −

+ += −

1842 1258 64

0 05 377 0 4414 22 5 6510 189

2 5154 584 0 28500 65100 0707.

. . . cot . .

.. x 10 in / in-3

Use the shear stress ratio and εx to obtain θ from Table 5.8.3.4.2-1, 210.4˚. Since this does not agree with the initial value, repeat.

( )( )( )( )( ) ( )( )

( ) ( )( )[ ]ε x =+ − −

+= −

1842 1258 64

05 377 0 4414 214 6510 189

2 0 28500 651011555.

. . . cot . .

.. x 10 in / in-3

Since the revised εx is negative:

( )( )( )( )( ) ( )( )

( ) ( )( ) ( )( )[ ]ε x =+ + − −

+ += −

1842 1258 64

0 05 377 0 4414 214 6510 189

2 5154 584 0 28500 65100 0671.

. . . cot . .

.. x 10 in / in-3

Use the shear stress ratio and the εx to obtain θ, 21.4˚. Since this agrees with the previous value, continue.

9. Obtain the final theta and beta factors from Table 5.8.3.4.2-1

θ = 21.4 β = 3.24

10. Calculate the shear resistance provided by the concrete, Vc (5.8.3.3) ( )( )( )( )( )Vc = =0 0316 324 8 8 58 64 13585. . . . k 11. Check if the region requires transverse reinforcement (5.8.2.4) 0.5φ(Vc + Vp) = (0.5)(0.9)(135.85 + 44.14) = 81.00 k Since Vu, 377.0 k, is greater than this value, transverse reinforcement is required.

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 37

Page 38: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

12. Calculate the shear resistance that the transverse reinforcement needs to provide, Vs

Vs = − − =377 00 9

13585 4414 238 90.

.. . . k

13. Calculate the required transverse reinforcement spacing

( )( )( )( )

s = =0 40 60 58 64 214

238 90150

. . cot ..

. in

14. Calculate the maximum allowable spacing of the transverse reinforcement (5.8.2.7) ( )( )0125 0125 8 1000. . .'fc = = ksi

Since v fcu 0.799 ksi= < 0125. ' s dvmax . .≤ ≤08 24 0 in 0.8dv = (0.8)(58.64) = 46.9 in > 24.0 in Therefore, the maximum spacing is 24 inches. Use 2 No. 4 bars at the 12-inch spacing used in the exterior beam.

13. Check if the minimum amount of transverse reinforcement is provided (5.8.2.5) Since using the same transverse reinforcement spacing as the exterior beam, the

minimum transverse reinforcement provision is satisfied. 14. Check the nominal shear resistance (5.8.3.3)

( )( )( )( )

Vs = =0 40 60 58 64 214

12299 26

. . cot .. k

( )( )( )( )0 25 0 25 8 8 58 64 4414 982 38. . . .'f b d Vc v v p+ = + = k. Vc + Vs + Vp = 135.85 + 299.26 + 44.14 = 479.25 k The lesser of these two values is 479.25 k and the factored shear resistance is: Vr = φVn = (0.9)(479.25) = 431.33 k > 377.0 k O.K. 15. Check the longitudinal reinforcement requirement (5.8.3.5)

Consider the lack of full development of the prestressing steel using the plot of the stress in the prestressing steel versus the distance from the end of the strand. At the end of the transfer length, 36 inches, the stress in the prestressing strand is fpe, 160.1 ksi. At the end of the development length, 151 inches, the stress in the prestressing strand, fps, is 263.9 ksi. Using a straight-line interpolation between the end of the transfer length and the development length the stress in the prestressing strand at 68 inches from the end of the beam is approximately:

( )fps ≈ +−−

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ − =1601

2639 1601151 36

68 36 189.. .

ksi

Calculate the tensile capacity provided by the longitudinal reinforcement: Asfy + Apsfps = 0 + (6.510)(189) = 1230 k Calculate the required tensile force where Vs is not to be greater than:

Vu

ϕ= =

377 00 9

41889.

.. k

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 38

Page 39: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

Since the nominal shear resistance provided, 299.26 k, is less than this value, use the nominal shear resistance provided.

( )( )( )( ) ( )( ) ( )A f A fs y ps ps+ ≥ + + − −

⎡⎣⎢

⎤⎦⎥

=1841 1258 64 10

0377 00 9

05 299 26 4414 214 951. .

..

. . . cot . k

Since 1230 k > 951 k O.K. At the inside edge of the bearing area of simple end supports to the section of critical shear, the longitudinal reinforcement on the flexural tension side of the member shall satisfy:

A f A fV

V Vs y ps psu

s p+ ≥ − −⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

ϕθ05. cot

The inside edge of the elastomeric bearing is the sum of the distance from the end of the beam to the centerline of bearing and one-half of the bearing pad.

Table 8 – Beam Shears, Centerline of Bearing (k) Dead Load

DC DW Beam Beam Slab/Diaph Rail FWS

Live Load plus Dynamic Load

Allowance Interior 67.8 68.4 8.3 13.5 117.4 Exterior 67.8 67.0 8.3 13.5 133.2

Exterior Beam – inside edge of bearing area 1. Calculate the effective shear depth, dv (5.8.2.9) Using the values from at the centerline of bearing: de = dp = 14.56 + 35.62 + 9 = 59.18 in Assuming rectangular behavior:

( )( )

( )( )( )( ) ( )( )c =

+ −

+⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟=

9114 270 0 0

085 5 080 114 0 28 9114270

5918

616.

. . . ..

. in

Since the depth to the neutral axis is less than the slab thickness, the assumed rectangular section behavior is correct. The depth of the compression block is:

a = (0.80)(6.16) = 4.93 in The calculated shear depth is:

dv = − =59184 93

256 72.

.. in

But dv does not need to be less than the greater of: 0.9de = (0.9)(59.18) = 53.26 in 0.72h = 58.32 in Since the calculated value is less than one of these values, dv = 58.32 in 2. Calculate the factored shear for the Strength I Limit State, Vu Using the shears from at the centerline of bearing: Vu = (1.25)(67.8 + 67.0 + 8.3) + (1.5)(13.5) + (1.75)(133.2) = 432.2 k

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 39

Page 40: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

3. Calculate the prestress tendon shear component

( )fps =⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =

1036

16015 44 49. . ksi

Vp = (Aps)(fps)(sinψ) = (12)(0.217)(44.49)(0.1059) = 12.27 k Since the inside edge of the bearing area is located within the transfer length, the stress in

the prestressing strands is a proportion of the effective prestressing stress. 4. Calculate the shear stress in the concrete and the shear stress ratio (5.8.2.9) The shear stress in the concrete is:

( )( )

( )( )( )vu =−

=432 2 0 9 12 27

0 9 8 58 321003

. . .. .

. ksi

The shear stress ratio is:

vf

u

c'

..= =

10038

0125

5. Calculate the strain in reinforcement on the flexural tension side of the member (5.8.3.4.2)

( )( )fpo =⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =0 7 270

1036

52 50. . ksi

Vudv = (432.2)(58.32) = 25206 k-in = 2100 k-ft Since this value is greater than the actual applied factored moment, use this value. Also,

since the inside edge of the bearing area is located within the transfer length, the value of fpo is a proportion of the full value of 189 ksi. Assume an initial value for θ of 23.7˚, which is based on the shear stress ratio of 0.125 and an assumed value for εx of zero.

( )( )( )( )( ) ( )( )

( ) ( )( )[ ]ε x =+ + − −

+=

2100 1258 32

0 05 432 2 12 27 237 6510 52 50

2 0 28500 651015325.

. . . cot . . .

.. x 10 in / in-3

Use the shear stress ratio and εx to obtain θ from Table 5.8.3.4.2-1, 37.0˚. Since this does not agree with the initial value, repeat.

( )( )( )( )( ) ( )( )

( ) ( )( )[ ]ε x =+ + − −

+=

2100 1258 32

0 05 432 2 12 27 37 0 6510 52 50

2 0 28500 65100 9943.

. . . cot . . .

.. x 10 in / in-3

Use the shear stress ratio and εx to obtain θ, 37.0˚. Since this agrees with the previous value, continue.

6. Calculate the shear resistance provided by the transverse reinforcement, Vs (5.8.3.3) Using the transverse reinforcement spacing previously calculated, 12 inches:

( )( )( )( )

Vs = =0 40 60 58 32 37 0

12154 79

. . cot .. ksi

7. Check the longitudinal reinforcement requirement (5.8.3.5) Calculate the tensile capacity of the longitudinal reinforcement: Asfy + Apsfps = 0 + (6.510)(44.49) = 290 k Calculate the required tensile force where Vs is not to be greater than:

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 40

Page 41: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

Vu

ϕ= =

432 20 9

480 22.

.. k

Since the nominal shear resistance provided, 154.79 k, is less than this value, use the nominal shear resistance provided.

( )( ) ( )A f A fV

V Vs y ps psu

s p+ ≥ − −⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ = − −

⎡⎣⎢

⎤⎦⎥

θ05432 2

0 905 154 79 12 27 37 0 518. cot

..

. . . cot . k

However, 290 k < 518 k N.G. Try decreasing the transverse reinforcement spacing so that the maximum value allowed

for Vs, 480.22 k, controls. The required tensile force is now:

( )( ) ( )A f A fV

V Vs y ps psu

s p+ = − −⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ = − −

⎡⎣⎢

⎤⎦⎥

θ05432 2

0 905 480 22 12 27 37 0 302. cot

..

. . . cot . k

However, 290 k < 302 k N.G. Add non-prestressed reinforcement, No. 5 bars The basic development length for No. 5 bars is:

125.

'

A f

fb y

c

But is not less than: 0.4dbfy

( )( )( )125 125 0 31 60

88 22

. . ..

'

A f

fb y

c

= = in

0.4dbfy = (0.4)(0.625)(60) = 15 in The larger of these two values is 15 inches and therefore, the development length is 15

inches. Since the inside edge of the bearing area is located within the development length, 10 inches from the end of the beam, consider the lack of full development. The tensile capacity provided by the longitudinal reinforcement is now:

( )( ) ( )( )A f A f As y ps ps s+ =⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ + =

1015

60 6510 44 49 302. . k

Solving for the area of reinforcement required: As = 0.31 in2

Add 2 No. 5 bars, As = 0.62 in2

( )( ) ( )( )A f A fs y ps ps+ =⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ + =

1015

0 62 60 6510 44 49 314. . . k

Since 314 k > 302 k O.K. Calculate the revised transverse reinforcement spacing.

( )( )( )( )

s = =0 40 60 58 32 37 0

480 22387

. . cot ..

. in

Use 3.75-inch transverse reinforcement spacing.

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 41

Page 42: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

Interior Beam – inside edge of bearing area 1. Calculate the effective shear depth, dv (5.8.2.9) The effective shear depth for the interior beam is the same as the exterior beam, same

strand pattern and section properties, 58.32 inches. 2. Calculate the factored shear for the Strength I Limit State, Vu Using the shears from at the centerline of bearing: Vu = (1.25)(67.8 + 68.4 + 8.3) + (1.5)(13.5) + (1.75)(117.4) = 406.3 k 3. Calculate the prestress tendon shear component

( )fps =⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ =

1036

160 05 44 46. . ksi

Vp = (Aps)(fps)(sinψ) = (12)(0.217)(44.46)(0.1059) = 12.26 k Once again the stress in the prestressing strands is reduced because the inside edge of the

bearing area is located within the transfer length. 4. Calculate the shear stress in the concrete and the shear stress ratio (5.8.2.9) The shear stress in the concrete is:

( )( )

( )( )( )vu =−

=406 3 0 9 12 26

0 9 8 58 320 941

. . .. .

. ksi

The shear stress ratio is:

vf

u

c'

..= =

0 9418

0118

5. Calculate the strain in reinforcement on the flexural tension side of the member (5.8.3.4.2) Vudv = (406.3)(58.32) = 23695 k-in = 1975 k-ft Since this value is greater than the actual applied factored moment, use this value. Once

again the value of fpo is reduced because the inside edge of the bearing area is located within the transfer length. Assume an initial value for θ of 23.7˚, which is based on the shear stress ratio of 0.118 and an assumed value for εx of zero.

( )( )( )( )( ) ( )( )

( ) ( )( )[ ]ε x =+ + − −

+=

1975 1258 32

0 05 406 3 12 26 237 6510 52 50

2 0 28500 651013836.

. . . cot . . .

.. x 10 in / in-3

Use the shear stress ratio and εx to obtain θ, 37.0˚. Since this does not agree with the initial value, repeat.

( )( )( )( )( ) ( )( )

( ) ( )( )[ ]ε x =+ + − −

+=

1975 1258 32

0 05 406 3 12 26 37 0 6510 52 50

2 0 28500 651008787.

. . . cot . . .

.. x 10 in / in-3

Use the shear stress ratio and εx to obtain θ, 37.0˚. Since this agrees with the previous value, continue.

6. Calculate the shear resistance provided by the transverse reinforcement, Vs (5.8.3.3) Using the transverse reinforcement spacing calculated for the interior beam, 3.75 inches:

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 42

Page 43: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

( )( )( )( )

Vs = =0 40 60 58 32 37 0

37549532

. . cot ..

. k

7. Check the longitudinal reinforcement requirement (5.8.3.5) Calculate the tensile capacity provided by the longitudinal reinforcement:

( )( ) ( )( )A f A fs y ps ps+ =⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ + =

1015

0 62 60 6510 44 46 314. . . k

Calculate the required tensile force where Vs is not to be greater than:

Vu

ϕ= =

406 30 9

45144.

.. k

Since the nominal shear resistance provided, 495.32 k, is greater than this value, use the limit on nominal shear resistance.

( )( ) ( )A f A fV

V Vs y ps psu

s p+ ≥ − −⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ = − −

⎡⎣⎢

⎤⎦⎥

θ05406 30 9

05 45144 12 26 37 0 283. cot.

.. . . cot . k

Since 314 k > 283 k O.K. INTERFACE SHEAR TRANSFER (5.8.4) For composite prestressed concrete beams, interface shear transfer is considered across the plane at the interface between two concrete cast at different times. The cross-section area, Avf, of the reinforcement crossing the shear plane is calculated per unit length along the beam or girder. The maximum longitudinal spacing of the rows of reinforcing bars is 24 inches. If the width of the contact surface exceeds 48.0 inches, a minimum of four bars per rows should be used (commentary provision). Evaluate interface shear transfer at the critical section. Acv = the area of concrete engaged in shear transfer (in2) Avf = the area of shear reinforcement crossing the shear plane (in2) bv = the width of the interface (in) c = the cohesion factor (ksi) µ = the friction factor Pc = the permanent net compressive force normal to the shear plane (k) de = the distance between the centroid of the steel on the tension side of the beam to the center

of the compression block in the deck (in) = the specified 28-day compressive strength of the weaker concrete (ksi) fc

'

Exterior Beam – 0.044 Point 1. Calculate the factored vertical shear force for the Strength I Limit State, composite loads, Vu Vu = (1.25)(7.6) + (1.5)(12.3) + (1.75)(125.4) = 247.4 k 2. Calculate the distance, de The distance from the bottom of the beam to the centroid of the steel on the tension side

of the beam is:

( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( )

y =+ +

=10

in2 10 4 10 6

304 00.

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 43

Page 44: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

The distance from the top of the deck slab to the center of the compression block is:

a2

4 942

2 47= =.

. in

d h t ya

e beam slab= + − − = + − − =2

72 9 4 00 2 47 74 53. . . in

3. Calculate the horizontal shear per unit length (5.8.4.1)

The horizontal shear per unit length can be calculated using:

VVdh

u

e=

Vh = =247 474 53

332.

.. k / in

VV

nh= = =

ϕ3320 9

369..

. k / in

4. Calculate the required transverse reinforcement spacing The required transverse reinforcement spacing can be calculated using:

( )

sA f PV cb

vf y c

n v=

+

µ

Avf = 0.40 in2 (2 No. 4 bars) For normal weight concrete placed against clean, hardened concrete with surface

intentionally roughened to an amplitude of 0.25 inch: c = 0.100 ksi

µ = 1.0λ = (1.0)(1.0) = 1.0 Pc = 0 k

( ) ( )( )[ ]

( )( )s =+

−= −

10 0 40 60 0369 0100 42

471. .. .

. in

Use 2 No. 4 bars at the 12-inch spacing used for web shear. The area of transverse reinforcement provided is:

Avf = =0 4012

0 033.

. in / i2 n

cv

v

5. Check the upper limit on the amount of nominal shear resistance used in design (5.8.4.1) The nominal shear resistance used in design shall be the lesser of: V f An c≤ 0 2. '

V A n c≤ 08. Acv = 42 in2

( )( )( )0 2 0 2 5 42 42 0. . .'f Ac cv = = k / in ( )( )08 08 42 336. . .Acv = = k / in The least of these two values is 33.6 k / in and the nominal resistance of the interface

plane is:

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 44

Page 45: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )( )[ ]V cA A f Pn cv vf y c= + + = + + =µ 0100 42 10 0 033 60 0 618. . . . k / in

c

6.18 k / in < 33.6 k / in

The factored shear resistance is: Vr = φVn = (0.9)(6.18) = 5.56 k / in > 3.32 k / in O.K. 6. Check the minimum reinforcement requirements (5.8.4.1) The cross-sectional area, Avf, of the reinforcement per unit length of the beam or girder

should satisfy that required by the following: ( )V cA A f Pn cv vf y= + +µ

Ab

fvfv

y≥

0 05.

The minimum reinforcement requirements may be waived if:

VA

n

cv< 0100. ksi

+

n

For the first requirement, set Vn equal to the applied nominal horizontal shear and solve for Avf.

( )( ) ( ) ( )( )[ ]369 0100 42 10 60 0. . .= + Avf

Avf = −0 009. in / i2

For the second requirement:

( )( )0 05 0 05 42

600 035

. ..

bf

v

y= = in / in2

However:

VA

n

cv= =

36942

0 088.

. ksi

Since this is less than 0.100 ksi, the minimum reinforcement requirements may be waived and the transverse reinforcement provided is satisfactory.

Interior Beam – 0.044 Point 1. Calculate the factored vertical shear force for the Strength I Limit State, composite loads, Vu Vu = (1.25)(7.6) + (1.5)(12.3) + (1.75)(110.5) = 221.3 k 2. Calculate the distance, de The distance between the centroid of the steel on the tension side of the beam to the

center of the compression block in the deck for the interior beam is the same as the exterior beam, same strand pattern and section properties, 74.53 inches.

3. Calculate the horizontal shear per unit length (5.8.4.1)

Vh = =221374 53

2 97.

.. k / in

VV

nh= = =

ϕ2 970 9

330..

. k / in

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 45

Page 46: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

4. Calculate the required transverse reinforcement spacing ( ) ( )( )[ ]

( )( )s =+

−= −

10 0 40 60 0330 0100 42

26 7. .. .

. in

Use 2 No. 4 bars at the 12-inch spacing used for web shear. Avf = 0.033 in2 /in 5. Check the upper limit on the amount of nominal shear resistance used in design (5.8.4.1) The upper limit on the amount of nominal shear resistance used in design and the

nominal resistance of the interface plane are the same as the exterior beam. The factored shear resistance is:

Vr = φVn = (0.9)(6.18) = 5.56 k / in > 2.97 k / in O.K. 6. Check the minimum reinforcement requirements (5.8.4.1) For the first requirement, set Vn equal to the applied nominal horizontal shear and solve

for Avf. ( )( ) ( ) ( )( )[ ]330 0100 42 10 60 0. . .= + Avf +

n Avf = −0 015. in / i2

For the second requirement: Avf = 0.035 in2 / in However:

VA

n

cv= =

33042

0 079.

. ksi

Since this is less than 0.100 ksi, the minimum reinforcement requirements may be waived and the transverse reinforcement provided is satisfactory.

DEFLECTIONS The beam deflections consist of instantaneous and long-term deflections. INSTANTANEOUS DEFLECTIONS The deflection of both the interior and exterior beams at midspan due to the initial prestressing force can be calculated using the following, for beams with two harp points, which uses the distance to the center of gravity of the prestressing force:

( )PLE I

e e eaLci g

c e c

2 2

2843

+ −⎡

⎣⎢

⎦⎥

ec = the distance from the center of gravity of the beam to the center of gravity of the

prestressing steel at the midspan of the beam (in) ee = the distance from the center of gravity of the beam to the center of gravity of the

prestressing steel at the end of the beam (in) a = the distance from the end of the beam to the nearest harp point (in) L = the beam length (in) Pt = the prestressing force at transfer (k) a = 48.5 feet = 582 inches

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 46

Page 47: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

L = 121 feet = 1452 inches (casting length of the beam) ( )( )

( )( )( ) ( )( )( )

δ = + −⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟⎡

⎣⎢⎢

⎦⎥⎥

⎧⎨⎪

⎩⎪

⎫⎬⎪

⎭⎪= ↑

16912 14528 4821 733320

32 09 14 38 32 0943

5821452

3572 2

2.

. . . . in

wbeam = 1.130 k/foot = 0.0942 k/inch The deflection at midspan due to the beam dead load using the casting length of the beam:

( )( )( )( )( )( )δ beam

beam

ci g

w LE I

= = =5384

5 0 0942 1452384 4821 733320

1544 4.

. in ↓

Exterior Beam wslab = 1.069 k/foot = 0.0891 k/inch wrail = 0.139 k/foot = 0.0116 k/inch The decrease in deflection at midspan due to the loss of prestress may be taken as a proportion of the instantaneous deflection due to the initial prestressing force by applying a ratio of the time dependent losses, losses after transfer, to the effective prestressing stress. Losses after transfer = ∆fpLt = 20.41 ksi The change in deflection is then:

( )δ =⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ = ↓

20 4118556

357 0 39..

. . in

The deflection at midspan due to the slab dead load is: ( )( )( )

( )( )( )δ slabslab

ci g

w LE I

= = =5384

5 0 0891 1440384 4821 733320

1414 4.

. in ↓

The deflection at midspan due to the rail dead load is: ( )( )( )

( )( )( )δ railrail

c gc

w LE I

= = =5384

5 0 0116 1440384 5154 1485884

0 084 4.

. in ↓

Interior Beam wslab = 1.069 k/foot = 0.0891 k/inch The decrease in deflection at midspan due to the loss of prestress: The losses after transfer = 20.51 ksi The change in deflection is:

( )δ =⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ = ↓

205118556

357 0 39..

. . in

The deflection at midspan due to the slab dead load is: ( )( )( )

( )( )( )δ slab = =5 0 0891 1440

384 4821 733320141

4.. in ↓

The deflection at midspan due to the rail dead load is: ( )( )( )

( )( )( )δ rail = =5 0 0116 1440

384 5154 14858840 08

4.. in ↓

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 47

Page 48: Figure 1 – Profile · 2008-03-05 · c) The width of the overhang: 4.75 feet (4.75)(12) = 57 in The least of these is 57 inches and the effective flange width is: (0.5)(114) + 57

LONG-TERM DEFLECTIONS Long-term or time-dependent deflections can be estimated by applying a multiplier to the instantaneous deflections. This example uses the average multipliers found in the PCI Bridge Design Manual published by the Precast Prestressed Concrete Institute.

Table 9 – Exterior Beam Deflections (in) Erection Final Load Initial

Deflection Multiplier Deflection Multiplier Deflection Initial prestress 3.57 ↑ 1.96 7.00 ↑ 2.88 10.28 ↑ Prestress loss 0.39 ↓ 1.00 0.39 ↓ 2.32 0.90 ↓ Beam 1.54 ↓ 1.96 3.02 ↓ 2.88 4.44 ↓ Slab 1.41 ↓ 1.00 1.41 ↓ 2.50 3.52 ↓ Rail 0.08 ↓ 1.00 0.08 ↓ 2.50 0.20 ↓ Total 2.10 ↑ 1.22 ↑

Table 10 – Interior Beam Deflections (in) Erection Final Load Initial

Deflection Multiplier Deflection Multiplier Deflection Initial prestress 3.57 ↑ 1.96 7.00 ↑ 2.88 10.28 ↑ Prestress loss 0.39 ↓ 1.00 0.39 ↓ 2.32 0.90 ↓ Beam 1.54 ↓ 1.96 3.02 ↓ 2.88 4.44 ↓ Slab 1.41 ↓ 1.00 1.41 ↓ 2.50 3.52 ↓ Rail 0.08 ↓ 1.00 0.08 ↓ 2.50 0.20 ↓ Total 2.10 ↑ 1.22 ↑

Example 1, July 2005 DRAFT 48