federal fiscal year 2016-2019 transportation improvement ... · pdf filejuly 2015 federal...

July 2015

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2016-2019 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

A regional program of surface transportation improvement projects to enhance the movement of goods and people along the greater central Iowa region’s transportation system.

The Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance (CIRTPA) prepared this report with partial

funding from the United States Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration and

Federal Transit Administration, and in part through local matching funds provided by the CIRTPA

member governments. These contents are the responsibility of the CIRTPA. The United States

Government and its agencies assume no liability for the contents of this report or for the use of its

contents. The CIRTPA approved this report on July 21, 2015. Please call (515) 334-0075 to obtain

permission for use.

© 2015 Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance

Glossary of Acronyms ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

CMAQ Congestion Mitigation Air Quality

DEMO Demonstration Award

DART Des Moines Area Metropolitan Transit Authority

DMAMPO Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

DISC Discretionary Federal Funds

ESP Economic Stimulus Package

ER Emergency Relief Program

FM Farm-to-Market Funds

FL Federal Lands Highway Program

FHWA Federal Highway Administration

FTA Federal Transit Administration

FFY Federal Fiscal Year

HIRTA Heart of Iowa Regional Transit Authority

HRRR High Risk Rural Roads

HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program

ICAAP Iowa’s Clean Air Attainment Program

Iowa DOT Iowa Department of Transportation

IM Interstate Maintenance

ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991

MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century

MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization

NHS National Highway System

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act

NHPP National Highway Performance Program

PL Planning Funds

PRF Primary Road Funds

RTP Recreational Trails Program

RPA Regional Planning Affiliation

RISE Revitalize Iowa's Sound Economy Program

SAFETEA-LU Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users

SRTS Safe Routes to School

STIP State Transportation Improvement Program

STP Surface Transportation Program

STP-HBP Surface Transportation Program – Highway Bridge Program

TAP Transportation Alternative Program

TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century

TIP Transportation Improvement Program

TTC MPO Transportation Technical Committee

Table of Contents

CHAPTER ONE Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….………..…………….1

General Overview of the TIP……………………………………………………………………………3

The TIP and Federal Guidance……………………………………………………………………3

Federal Transportation Planning Process…………………………………………………...4

Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance……………………...……..5

Transportation Improvement Program………………………………………………………7

Revising the TIP………………………………………………………………………………………...9

CHAPTER TWO Project Selection Procedures…………………………………………………………………..…….11

Surface Transportation Program Project Selection………………………………...….11

Transportation Alternatives Program Project Selection……………….………..…..12

Highway Bridge Program Project Selection………………………………………………13

CHAPTER THREE

Funding Programs………………………………………………………………………………….……..14

Surface Transportation Program……………………………………………………………...14

Transportation Alternatives Program………………………………………………………14

Federal Funding Programs…………………………………………………………………….…17

State Funding Programs…………………………………………………………………………..18

Transit Funding Programs……………………………………………………………………….19

CHAPTER FOUR

Federal Fiscal Year 2015 Status Reports………………………………………….……………21

CHAPTER FIVE

Federal Highway Administration Projects…………………………………………..………..27

Program Format……………………………………………………………………………………...27

FFY 2016-2019 FHWA Project List……………………………..………………………….…28

CHAPTER SIX

Federal Transit Administration Projects……………………………………………..………..43

Program Format……………………………………………………………..……………….………43

FFY 2016-2019 Transit Project List………………………………………………………….44

CHAPTER SEVEN Financial Plan…………………………………………………………………………………..……………48

Federal Highway Administration Projects………………………………………………...48

Federal Transit Administration Projects…………………………………………………...58

CHAPTER EIGHT

Public Participation………………………………………………………………………..…………….59

Figures and Tables Figure 1.1: CIRTPA Membership…………………………………………………………………….………………………………6

Table 4.1: City of Boone………………………………..……………………………………………………………………...………21

Table 4.2: Boone County………………………………………………………………………………………..……………….…….21

Table 4.3: Dallas County…………………………………………………………………………………………….….……………..21

Table 4.4: Iowa Department of Transportation……………………………………………………….…….………………22

Table 4.5: City of Huxley…………………..…………………………………………………………………………………………..23

Table 4.6: City of Indianola…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..23

Table 4.7: Jasper County……………………………………………………………………………………………………..……..…23

Table 4.8: City of Knoxville…………………………………………………………………………………………...………..…….23

Table 4.9: Madison County……………………………………………………………………………………………...………..…..23

Table 4.10: Marion County……………………………………….....………………………………………………………………..24

Table 4.11: City of Melcher-Dallas…………………….………………………………………………………………..…………24

Table 4.12: City of Mingo…..……………………………………………….………………………………..……………………….24

Table 4.13: City of Newton……………………………………………………………………………………………..……….…...24

Table 4.14: City of Pella…………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………24

Table 4.15: City of Perry…………………………………………………………………………………………….……….……..…25

Table 4.16: Story County………………………………………………………………………………………………………………25

Table 4.17: Warren County………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…25

Table 4.18: Heart of Iowa Regional Transit Authority……………………………………………………...……...……..26

Table 7.1: CIRPTA Federal-Aid Funding Sources………………………………………………………….….…………….49

Table 7.2: Surface Transportation Program Financial Constraint…………………………………..……………….49

Table 7.3: Transportation Alternatives Program Financial Constraint……………………………………………49

Table 7.4: 2014 City Street O+M Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes……………………………………………50

Table 7.5: Forecasted Maintenance Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes………………………………….……51

Table 7.6: Forecasted Operation Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes………………………………………..….52

Table 7.7: County Road O+M Costs on Federal-Aid Routes……………………………………………………….…….53

Table 7.8: Forecasted County Road Operations Costs on Fed-Aid Routes………………………………….…….53

Table 7.9: Forecasted County Road Maintenance Costs on Federal-Aid Routes…………………………….....54

Table 7.10: 2012 City Street Fund Receipts……………..…………………………………………………………………….55

Table 7.11: Forecasted City Street Fund Revenue…………………………………………….……………………………55

Table 7.12: State Fiscal Year 2013 Farm-to-Market Receipts………………………………………………………….56

Table 7.13: Forecasted Farm-to-Market Revenue……………………………………………………...…………………..56

Table 7.14: Fiscal Year 2013 Secondary Road Fund Receipts…………………………………………………………57

Table 7.15: Forecasted Secondary Road Fund Revenue…………………………………………………………………57

Table 7.16: HIRTA’s Federal Funding Sources for FY 2016 – 2019………….………………………………...…....58

Table 7.17: HIRTA’s State Funding Sources for FY 2016 – 2019…………………………………………..…..……..58

Committee Representation Transportation Policy Committee Wayne Clinton, Chair Story County

Representing Name Title

City of Adel Brett Klein City Administrator

City of Boone Luke Nelson City Administrator

City of Indianola Chuck Burgin Director of Community Development

City of Knoxville Harold Stewart City Manager

City of Nevada Larry Stevens City Engineer

City of Newton Keith Laube Public Works Director/City Engineer

City of Pella Denny Buyert Public Works Director

City of Perry Josh Wuebker Assistant Public Works Director

City of Story City Mark Jackson City Administrator

City of Winterset Mark Nitchals City Administrator

Boone County Chet Hollingshead County Supervisor

Dallas County Brad Golightly County Supervisor

Jasper County Dennis Carpenter County Supervisor

Madison County Todd Hagan County Engineer

Marion County Jim Kingery County Supervisor

Polk County Bret VandeLune Land Use Planning Manager

Story County Wayne E. Clinton County Supervisor

Warren County Dean Yordi County Supervisor

Ames Area MPO* Damion Pregitzer Traffic Engineer

DART* Elizabeth Presutti General Manager

HIRTA* Julia Castillo Executive Director

Iowa DOT* Mike Clayton District 1 Planner

Transportation Policy Committee Officers


Story County Wayne Clinton Chair

Boone County Chet Hollingshead Vice‐Chair

City of Pella Denny Buyert Secretary/Treasurer

* Advisory, Non‐Voting

Transportation Technical Committee Jim George, Chair Dallas County


City of Adel Brett Klein City Administrator

City of Boone Wayne Schwartz City Engineer

City of Indianola Chuck Burgin Director of Community Development

City of Knoxville Harold Stewart City Manager

City of Nevada Larry Stevens City Engineer

City of Newton Keith Laube Public Works Director/City Engineer

City of Pella Denny Buyert Public Works Director

City of Perry Josh Wuebker Assistant Public Works Director

City of Story City Mark Jackson City Administrator

City of Winterset Mark Nitchals City Administrator

Boone County Scott Kruse County Engineer

Dallas County Jim George County Engineer

Jasper County Russell Stutt County Engineer

Madison County Todd Hagan County Engineer

Marion County Tyler Christian County Engineer

Polk County Bret VandeLune Land Use Planning Manager

Story County Darren Moon County Engineer

Warren County David Carroll County Engineer

HIRTA Julia Castillo Executive Director

Ames Area MPO* Damion Pregitzer Traffic Engineer

DART* Jim Tishim Planning Director

Iowa DOT* Mike Clayton District 1 Planner

Transportation Technical Committee Officers


Dallas County Jim George Chair

Boone County Scott Kruse Vice‐Chair

* Advisory, Non‐Voting

C H A P T E R O N E

Introduction

The FFY 2016-2019 TIP contains seven chapters covering the CIRTPA’s guidelines for choosing and

funding projects, status reports of the previous FFY projects, a listing of projects in the Federal

highway and Federal transit element, a financial plan for all Federal-aid projects, required

resolutions and certifications, and a summary of public comments.

Chapter One: General Overview of the TIP

The Introduction explains Federal transportation planning guidelines and provides background

information on the CIRTPA’s responsibilities, representatives, and committees. The chapter also

includes information about the CIRTPA’s public participation process procedures and provides an

overview of the TIP, including its purpose, requirements, and the methodology to adopt, implement,

amend, or modify the plan.

Chapter Two: Project Selection Procedures

This chapter provides background into the CIRTPA’s project selection procedure, including

eligibility requirements, basis of funding projects, and project scoring process.

Chapter Three: Funding Programs

This chapter provides a summary of the various funding programs available for project within the

CIRTPA planning area including Federal, State, and local funding sources. The chapter also

discusses the intent of each of these programs.

Chapter Four: Federal Fiscal Year 2015 Status Reports

The Federal Fiscal Year 2015 Status Reports chapter is a status listing of all Federal-aid projects

programmed to utilize Federal funding in FFY 2015.

Chapter Five: Federal Highway Administration Projects

The Federal Highway Administration Projects chapter provides a listing of all Federal-aid projects

programmed to utilize FHWA funds during the next four FFYs (FFY 2016-2019).

1

Chapter Six: Federal Transit Administration Projects

The Federal Transit Administration Projects chapter provides a listing of all Federal-aid projects

programmed to utilize FTA funds during the next four FFYs (FFY 2016-2019).

Chapter Seven: Financial Plan

The Financial Plan chapter summarizes the financial availability of the CIRTPA to implement

surface transportation improvements. The chapter includes the fiscal constraint of the STP and TAP

funds, listing the forecasted operations and maintenance expenditures, and forecasted non Federal-

aid revenues. The chapter also includes a section discussing the transit funding Federal-aid by year.

Chapter Eight: Public Comment

The public comment chapter includes a summary on the disposition of comments made as part of

the public review of the TIP on June 23, 2015, and any subsequent written comments submitted to

the CIRTPA before July 16, 2015.

Appendices

Resolutions and Certifications

The resolutions and certifications chapter includes the TIP’s resolution of adoption by the CIRTPA,

a self-certification of the metropolitan planning process, and a certification of the financial capacity

analysis.

2

General Overview of the TIP

The transportation system in a regional planning area is vital for the movement of people and

goods to, though, from, and within the area. A transportation system takes on two primary roles:

the movement of people and the movement of goods. The transportation improvement program

(TIP) is a metropolitan area’s regionally agreed upon list of surface transportation improvements

that received Federal funding to move goods and people in a metropolitan area’s transportation

system.

The TIP and Federal Guidance

Congress passed the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1962, requiring regional agencies to conduct a

"continuing, comprehensive, and coordinated" (3-C) transportation planning process. Congress

took additional steps in drafting the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 by establishing Metropolitan

Planning Organizations (MPO) in urbanized areas over 50,000 persons in population, and by

dedicating to MPOs a small portion of each state's funding from the Highway Trust Fund. The

Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) empowered and provided for

flexibility in the use of funding, improved state-regional cooperation, and enhanced public

participation. The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) legislation of 1998

expanded the role and responsibilities of metropolitan areas exceeding 200,000 persons in

population with the designation of Transportation Management Areas (TMA). In 2005, Congress

passed the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users

(SAFETEA-LU).

SAFETEA-LU guaranteed funding for highways, highway safety, and public transportation through

Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2009 (September 30, 2009). Then the United States Senate passed

continuing resolutions to extend SAFETEA-LU and to provide appropriations for transit programs

through 2012 at funding levels consistent with authorized 2009 levels. SAFETEA-LU addressed the

many challenges facing transportation systems including improving safety, reducing traffic

congestion, improving efficiency in freight movement, increasing intermodal connectivity, and

protecting the environment. SAFETEA-LU promoted more efficient and effective Federal surface

transportation programs by focusing on transportation issues of national significance, while giving

3

state and local transportation decision makers more flexibility to solve transportation problems in

their communities.1

On July 6, 2012, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) was signed into law

replacing SAFETEA-LU. MAP-21 provides essential funds for transportation projects ranging from

passenger rail, freight transportation, highway and bridge projects, and bicycle and pedestrian

projects. MAP-21 took effect on October 1, 2012, and funds surface transportation projects through

September 30, 2014. The bill provides $105 billion in funding per year for Federal Fiscal Year’s

(FFY) 2013 and 2014. An extension was signed in 2014, which authorizes surface transportation

funding through May 31, 2015. MAP-21 includes a number of major changes including the

elimination of the Surface Transportation Program Transportation Enhancements Program,

expansion of the Transportation Infrastructure Finance Innovation Act (TIFIA), and streamlining of

the environmental review process. Federal transit program also chance slightly with Job Access and

Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom funds being consolidated into the Urbanized Area

Formula Grants.2

Federal Transportation Planning Process Title 23 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 450, Subpart C, states that

MPOs are to carry out a:

“…continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive multimodal transportation planning

process, including the development of a metropolitan transportation plan and a

transportation improvement program (TIP), that encourages and promotes the safe

and efficient development, management, and operation of surface transportation

systems to serve the mobility needs of people and freight (including accessible

pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities) and foster economic growth

and development, while minimizing transportation-related fuel consumption and air

pollution.”

Section 450.306 identifies eight planning factors to identify the “scope of the metropolitan

transportation planning process.” These include:

1 http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/safetealu/summary.htm 2 http://www.nlc.org/Documents/Influence%20Federal%20Policy/Advocacy/Legislative/summary-map21-transportation-jul2012.pdf

4

1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global

competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;

2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-

motorized users;

3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-

motorized users;

4. Increase accessibility and mobility of people and freight;

5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, and

improve consistency between transportation improvements and State and local

planned growth and economic patterns;

6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across

and between modes, for people and freight;

7. Promote efficient system management and operation; and,

8. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance

The Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance (CIRTPA) serves as the formal

transportation planning body for the greater central Iowa regional area, carrying out the intent of

Title 23 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations, Section 450. The CIRTPA works to carry

out a 3-C multimodal transportation planning process for the greater central Iowa regional area,

excluding the areas within the Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the

Ames Area MPO.

Responsibilities

The CIRTPA provides a regional forum to assure local, state, and Federal agencies and the public

coordinate transportation planning issues, and to prepare transportation plans and programs. The

CIRTPA develops both long and short-range multimodal transportation plans, selects, and approves

projects for Federal funding based on regional priorities, and develops methods to reduce traffic

congestion.

The CIRTPA is responsible for these transportation planning activities within the geographic area

identified as the Regional Planning Area (RPA). The CIRTPA approved its current RPA on January

5

10, 2008. The RPA includes all portions of Boone, Dallas, Jasper, Madison, Marion, Polk, Story, and

Warren Counties except for the planning area of the Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning

Organization and the Ames Area Metropolitan Planning Organization.

Membership

Full voting membership to the CIRTPA is open to any county or city government located, wholly or

partially, in the designated RPA containing a minimum population of 3,000 persons that adopts the

CIRTPA's 28E Agreement (agreement entered into under Chapter 28E, Code of Iowa, establishing

the CIRTPA and its responsibilities). Currently, CIRTPA membership includes the following cities

and counties:

Figure 1.1: CIRTPA Membership

Cities Counties

Adel Pella Boone County

Boone Perry Dallas County

Huxley Story City Jasper County

Indianola Winterset Madison County

Knoxville Marion County

Nevada Polk County

Newton Story County

Warren County

The Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT), the Des Moines Area Regional Transit Authority

(DART), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA),

and the Ames Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO) serve as advisory non-voting,

representatives to the CIRTPA.

Organization

Two designated committees form the structure of the CIRTPA: the Transportation Technical

Committee (TTC) and the Transportation Policy Committee (TPC). The CIRTPA member

governments’ and agencies’ boards and councils appoint their own representatives to the TTC and

to the TPC.

The CIRTPA TTC is comprised primarily of representatives of member governments’ and agencies’

technical staffs, including planners, engineers, and city administrators. The CIRTPA TPC is primarily

6

comprised of elected officials that include mayors, city council members, city managers, and county

supervisors.

The CIRTPA staff supports the TTC and the TPC. The TTC offers technical guidance and

recommendations to the TPC. The TPC takes formal actions on transportation topics after

reviewing and considering the TTC’s recommendations.

Additionally, the CIRTPA supports, as needed, other subcommittees, roundtables, working groups,

and advisory committees of the Des Moines Area MPO on various transportation-related topics

relevant to the CIRTPA's responsibilities.

Representation

Each member government is entitled to one representative each on the CIRTPA TPC and on the

CIRTPA TTC. As previously noted, the Iowa DOT, DART, FHWA, FTA, and the AAMPO serve as

advisory representatives to the CIRTPA and each have one representative.

Transportation Improvement Program

The CIRTPA’s Federal Fiscal Years 2016-2019 Transportation Improvement Program (FFY 2016-

2019 TIP) serves as a list of Federal-aid eligible surface transportation improvements for the

CIRTPA’s MPA. The TIP covers a period of no less than four years and is updated annually for

compatibility with the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program development and approval

process. State Transit Assistance (STA) and Statewide Transportation Alternatives Program

(Statewide TAP) funds are the only source of state funding shown in the TIP. The TIP identifies all

Federal funds programmed during the four-year period (FFY 2016-2019). Additionally, the TIP

identifies all projects by Federal funding program and by FFY.

TIP Requirements

Title 23 of the CFR, Section 450.324, indicates the TIP must cover a period of no less than four

years, be updated at least every four years, and be approved by the CIRTPA and the Governor (or in

the case of the State of Iowa, the TIP will be approved by the Iowa DOT). Additionally, Section

7

450.324 states the TIP shall include:

Capital and non-capital surface transportation projects within the boundaries of the

metropolitan planning area proposed for funding;

Contain all regionally significant projects requiring an action by the FHWA or the

FTA whether or not the projects are to be funded;

All regionally significant projects proposed to be funded with Federal funds other

than those administered by FHWA or the FTA, as well as all regionally significant

projects to be funded with non-Federal funds;

A financial plan that demonstrates how the approved TIP can be implemented,

indicates resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to

be made available to carry out the TIP, and recommends any additional financing

strategies for needed projects and programs;

A project, or a phase of a project, only if full funding can reasonably be anticipated to

be available for the project within the time period contemplated for completion of

the project; and,

Sufficient descriptive material, estimated total project cost, amount of Federal funds

proposed to be obligated during each program year, and identification of the

agencies responsible for each project or phase.

Plan Consistency

Each project or project phase included in the TIP must be consistent with other CIRTPA plans,

including the Horizon Year 2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (HY 2035 MTP). In addition, the

CIRTPA requires consistency among the TIP and member governments’ and agencies’ capital

improvement plans. In particular, the CIRTPA requires consistency among proposed short- and

long-range projects, strategies, plans, and programs.

TIP Adoption

Adoption of the CIRPTA’s FFY 2016-2019 TIP is subject to the CIRPTA’s review and approval. The

review process consists of a public comment period that offers opportunities for review and

comment of the draft FFY 2016-2019 TIP. At the conclusion of the public review period, CIRTPA

staff reviews and summarizes all submitted comments and presents the findings to the CIRTPA

committees for consideration into the final FFY 2016-2019 TIP. The CIRTPA submits the final

(approved) FFY 2016-2019 TIP, with a copy of the formal resolution, to the Iowa DOT. The Iowa

8

DOT then reviews the plan to ensure compliance with Federal regulations.

Revising the TIP

Under Federal law, the CIRTPA may revise the TIP at any time under procedures agreed to by the

cooperating parties consistent with the procedures established. Revisions are changes that occur

between annual updates.

The Iowa DOT identifies two types of revisions to the TIP: major revisions (amendments) and

minor revisions (administrative modifications). The Iowa DOT considers the following criteria

when determining the type of TIP revision.

Amendments

An amendment is a major change to a project in the TIP, including the addition or deletion of a

project, a major change in project cost or project phase initiation dates, or a major change in the

design concept or scope (e.g., changing project termini or the number of through lanes). The Iowa

DOT considers amendments to the FFY 2016-2019 TIP any proposed changes that meet any of the

following criteria:

Project cost – Projects in which the recalculated project costs increase Federal aid by

more than 30 percent or increase total Federal aid by more than $2,000,000 from

the original amount;

Schedule changes – Projects which are added or deleted from the TIP;

Funding sources – Receiving additional Federal funding sources to a project; and,

Scope changes – Changing the project termini, project alignment, the amount of

through traffic lanes, the type of work from an overlay to reconstruction, or the

change to include widening of the roadway.

If the Iowa DOT considers a change to the TIP to be an amendment, the CIRTPA must approve the

requested change and must follow the public participation process identified in the CIRTPA’s Public

Participation Plan (PPP). The PPP states the CIRTPA would schedule a public meeting to receive

public comments at the Policy Committee meeting prior to the Policy Committee taking action on

the proposed amendment. If the Policy Committee approves the amendment, the CIRTPA would

notify the Iowa DOT, the FHWA, and the FTA.

9

Administrative Modifications

An administrative modification is a minor change to a project in the TIP, including minor changes to

project phase costs, funding sources or previously included projects, and project or project phase

initiation dates. The Iowa DOT considers as administrative modification to the FFY 2016-2019 TIP

proposed changes that meet any of the following criteria:

Project cost – Projects in which the recalculated project costs do not increase

Federal aid by more than 30 percent or do not increase total Federal aid by more

than $2,000,000 from the original amount;

Schedule changes – Changes in schedules to projects which are included in the first

four years of the TIP;

Funding sources – Changes to funding from one source to another; and,

Scope changes – All changes to the projects scope are amendments.

If the Iowa DOT considers a change to the TIP to be an administrative modification, the CIRTPA

would conduct a thorough review of the proposed administrative modification and would process

the revision administratively by notifying the Iowa DOT, FHWA, and FTA.

10

CHAPTER TWO

Project Selection Procedures

The CIRTPA, when considering project requests for STP funds, should place primary emphasis upon

region-wide transportation system improvement needs as identified in the CIRTPA’s Long-Range

Transportation Plan (Plan), with how those needs impact the movement of people and goods

throughout the regional area, and how the requested project will have potential benefits and

potential impacts on all communities in central Iowa. The CIRTPA should consider funding

regionally significant transportation projects in the Plan.

All projects applying for CIRTPA STP or TAP funding must be sponsored by one or more of the

twenty CIRTPA member governments, the Iowa DOT, DART or HIRTA. Other entities are eligible

only with co-sponsorship by one of the organizations listed above. When applying for STP or TAP

funds a sponsor must submit a resolution from that sponsor’s council, board of supervisors, or

similar governing body, guaranteeing the local funds for the STP match and authorizing the project.

Surface Transportation Program Project Selection

The purpose of the STP is to provide flexible funding that may be used by localities for

improvements on any Federal-aid highway, bridge projects on any public road, and intracity and

intercity bus terminals and facilities. The STP is also intended to provide funding for transit capital

improvements, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and regional transportation planning activities.

The method for the distribution of the CIRTPA’s STP funding occurs through a sub-allocation

process to all CIRTPA member governments with populations over 5,000. The calculations used in

the CIRTPA’s STP sub-allocation process reflect the formulas used by the Iowa DOT in distributing

STP funds to Iowa’s regional planning affiliations. Each CIRTPA member government eligible to

receive STP funds makes individual decisions on where to expend those resources within their

respective jurisdictions. Many CIRTPA members save their STP allocation for several years in order

to build more substantial projects.

11

Transportation Alternatives Program Project Selection

The CIRTPA follows the FHWA’s Guidance for Transportation Enhancement Activities in the

administration of the TAP project selection, which may be publicly accessed at

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/transportation_alternatives/guidance/. Any project

applying for CIRTPA TAP funding must be sponsored by one or more of the twelve CIRTPA member

cities and eight CIRTPA member counties governments. The CIRTPA only awards TAP funds for the

coming Federal Fiscal Year.

The following are the CIRTPA guidelines for the TAP Program. These guidelines are considered by

the CIRTPA when allocating monies to TAP projects.

1. The CIRTPA TTC’s TAP Subcommittee evaluates TAP projects in five categories:

1. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities;

2. Historical Preservation Facilities;

3. Streetscape;

4. Environmental; and,

5. Safe Routes to School.

The CIRTPA TTC and the CIRTPA TPC will be provided with the TAP

Subcommittee representative scores, an average score, and the percentage

points received for each project submitted. The CIRTPA TTC will develop a TAP

recommendation to the CIRTPA TPC that identifies projects that the CIRTPA TTC

recommends for inclusion in the draft CIRTPA TIP. The final projects selected

for inclusion in the draft CIRTPA TIP will be determined by the CIRTPA TPC.

2. The CIRTPA and its staff will continue to work with the Iowa DOT and other

MPOs and RPAs in the state to refine the TAP application and implementation

process.

3. Representation on the TAP Subcommittee will be updated annually prior to the

solicitation of the TAP applications. The TAP Subcommittee will be an eight-

member subcommittee, with one representative from each county. Each

representative on the subcommittee will represent one county and all the cities

12

within that county. Each of the eight member counties, and the member cities

within those counties, will appoint one representative to the TAP Subcommittee.

4. TAP funds must have a relationship to surface transportation. Proximity to a

roadway or transportation facility alone is not sufficient to establish a

relationship to surface transportation. Project sponsors should provide a clear

and credible description of this relationship in their project’s proposal. The

focus is on a clear and credible description of how the proposed TA project

relates to the surface transportation system. Several questions should be asked:

In what way(s) is the project related to surface transportation through

present or past use as a transportation resource?

Is there a direct connection to a person or event nationally significant in

the development of surface transportation?

What is the extent of the relationship(s) to surface transportation?

What groups and individuals are affected by the relationship(s), when

did the relationship(s) start and end, or do the relationship(s) continue?

Is the relationship substantial enough to justify the investment of

transportation funds?

The scoring criterion for TAP projects is located in Appendix C.

Highway Bridge Program Project Selection

The primary factor in Highway Bridge Program project selection is condition. Counties annually

review the results from the bridge inspections and make funding decisions based on these reports.

Other factors that are considered include traffic counts, freight movement, and detour lengths. For

example, a bridge posted for weight limits that is on an important freight and farm goods route

might be replaced before other bridge that are in worse condition but don’t have a significant

impact on traffic movements.

13

CHAPTER THREE

Funding Programs The following chapter summarized the various funding program available for projects in the

CIRPTA’s planning area.

Surface Transportation Program

The purpose of the STP is to provide flexible funding that may be used by localities for

improvements on any Federal-aid highway, bridge projects on any public road, and intracity and

intercity bus terminals and facilities. The STP is also intended to provide funding for transit capital

improvements, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and regional transportation planning activities. The

CIRTPA is allocated approximately $5 million per year in STP funding.

Transportation Alternatives Program The purpose of the TAP is to provide funding for programs and projects defined as transportation

alternatives, including on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities, infrastructure projects for

improving non-driver access to public transportation and enhanced mobility, community

improvement activities, and environmental mitigation; recreational trail program projects; safe

routes to school projects; and projects for the planning, design or construction of boulevards and

other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided

highways.

The CIRTPA groups these eligible activities into categories as follows:

Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities: Provision of on-street and off-street facilities for

pedestrians and bicycles and the conversion and use of abandoned railway

corridors. New Construction subcategory is for projects creating a new facility,

whereas the Major Reconstruction subcategory is for projects that result in a major

rehabilitation of an existing facility.

14

Historic Preservation: Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic

transportation facilities.

Streetscape: Improvements to pedestrian facilities along a transportation corridor;

sidewalks, lighting, safety-related infrastructure, signalization, and, traffic calming.

Environmental: Control and removal of outdoor advertising; address storm water

management, control, and water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle-

caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity; vegetation

management practices in transportation rights-of-way to improve roadway safety,

prevent against invasive species, and provide erosion control.

Safe Routes to Schools: Infrastructure related projects.-planning, design, and

construction of infrastructure-related projects in the vicinity of schools that will

substantially improve the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school. Non-

infrastructure related activities to encourage walking and bicycling to school.

The list of qualifying activities is intended to be exclusive, not illustrative. Only those activities

listed are eligible TAP activities. Measures in the activities listed, which go beyond what is

customarily provided as environmental mitigation, are considered as Transportation Alternatives

Programs. TAP projects are non-motorized transportation-related activities.

Transportation Alternative Program projects must have a relationship to surface transportation.

Proximity to a roadway or transportation facility alone is not sufficient to establish a relationship to

surface transportation. Project sponsors should provide a clear and credible description of this

relationship in their project’s proposal. The focus is on a clear and credible description of how the

proposed TAP project relates to the surface transportation system. Several questions should be

asked:

1. In what way(s) is the project related to surface transportation through

present or past use as a transportation resource?

2. Is there a direct connection to a person or event nationally significant in the

development of surface transportation?

15

3. What is the extent of the relationship(s) to surface transportation?

4. What groups and individuals are affected by the relationship(s)?

5. When did the relationship(s) start and end or does the relationship(s)

continue?

6. Is a relationship substantial enough to justify the investment of

transportation funds?

The TAP guidance states that proximity to a transportation facility alone is not sufficient to

establish a relationship. The following application types generally have been considered ineligible

by the FHWA, in cooperation with the Iowa DOT:

1. Surfacing or resurfacing of existing roads or construction of new roads;

2. Construction or surfacing of parking lots (unless trailhead parking lot);

3. Construction of low water crossings on roads;

4. Picnic shelters, picnic tables, grills (unless directly related to a trailhead);

5. Construction of new buildings (unless they are rest rooms or trailhead

shelters in conjunction with trails that will accommodate bikes or

pedestrians);

6. Mitigation or National Environmental Policy Act Section 106 documentation

of a bridge replacement;

7. Applications without a public sponsor (city, State, or county agency);

8. Historic applications where the facility or structure is not eligible for the

National Register of Historic Places (please review with the State Historic

Preservation Office);

9. Historic preservation activities that do not demonstrate some significant

historic connection with transportation system; and,

10. Normal environmental mitigation work.

The Iowa DOT divides TAP funds into two categories. Fifty percent of the TAP funds are divided

between the MPO’s and Regional Planning Affiliations (RPA). The DOT retains $1 million of the

remaining TAP funds for Statewide TAP projects and the rest is targeted to MPO’s and RPA’s as TAP

flex funds.

16

Federal Funding Programs

Some FHWA funds are distributed by statutory formulas, while other funds are “discretionary”

(congressionally earmarked). The primary sources of FHWA formula funding to Iowa include:

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ): CMAQ

provides flexible funding for transportation projects and programs tasked with helping

to meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act. These projects can include those that

reduce congestion and improve air quality.

National Highway Performance Program (NHPP): This program consolidates the

National Highway System and the Interstate Maintenance Program into one program.

NHPP expands the number of eligible roadway miles and funds may be used to

construct or improve NHS roadways, including some state highways, U.S. highways,

and Interstates.

STP Highway Bridge Program (STP-HBP): While the Highway Bridge Program was

eliminated in MAP-21, a portion of Iowa’s STP will continue to be targeted directly to

counties and dedicated specifically to county bridge projects. A portion of these funds

are required to be obligated for off-system bridges. The remaining funds can be used

on either on-system or off-system bridges.

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP): This is a core Federal-aid program

that funds projects with the goal of achieving a significant reduction in traffic fatalities

and serious injuries on public roads. Portions of these funds are set aside for use on

high-risk rural roads and railway highway crossings.

Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) and Tribal Transportation Program

(TTP): The FLAP Program provides funding for projects that improve access within,

and to, federal lands. The FLAP funding will be distributed through a grant process

where a group of FHWA, Iowa DOT, and local government representatives will solicit,

rank, and select projects to receive funding. The TTP provides safe and adequate

transportation and public road access to and within Indian reservations and Indian

lands. Funds are distributed based on a statutory formula based on tribal population,

road mileage, and average tribal shares of the former Tribal Transportation Allocation

Methodology.

17

Demonstration Funding (DEMO): Demonstration funding is a combination of

different programs and sources. The FHWA administers discretionary programs

through various offices representing special funding categories. An appropriation bill

provides money to a discretionary program, through special congressionally directed

appropriations or through legislative acts, such as the American recovery and

Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA).

State Planning and Research (SPR): SPR funds are available to fund statewide

planning and research activities. A portion of SPR funds are provided to RPAs to

support transportation planning efforts.

State Funding Programs

In addition to the distribution of Federal-aid formula funds, the Iowa Department of Transportation

administers several grant programs through application processes that need to be documented in

the TIP. They include the following:

Statewide Transportation Alternatives Programs: Transportation Alternatives

Program projects are intended to go beyond the normal mitigation of a transportation

improvement project. Statewide Enhancement funds are made available through an

application process for projects of statewide significance. Statewide Enhancement

projects are categorized by Trail and Bicycle Facility, Historic and Archeological, and

Scenic and Environmental projects. Project formerly eligible under Safe Routes to

School are now eligible for TAP funding.

Recreational Trail Program: This program provides federal funding for both

motorized and nonmotorized trail projects and is funded through a takedown from

Iowa’s TAP funding. The decision to participate in this program is made annually by

the Iowa Transportation Commission.

Iowa Clean Air Attainment Program (ICAAP): The ICAAP funds projects that are

intended to maximize emission reductions through traffic flow improvements, reduced

vehicle-miles of travel, and reduced single-occupancy vehicle trips. This program

utilizes $4 million of Iowa’s CMAQ apportionment.

City Bridge Program: A portion of STP funding dedicated to local bridge projects is

set aside for the funding of bridge projects within cities. Eligible projects need to be

classified as structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. Projects are rated and

18

prioritized by the Office of Local Systems with awards based upon criteria identified in

the application process. Projects awarded grant funding are subject to a federal-aid

obligation limitation of $1 million.

Highway Safety Improvement Program – Secondary (HSIP-Secondary): This

program is being funded using a portion of Iowa’s Highway Safety Improvement

Program and funds safety projects on rural roadways.

Transit Funding Programs

Similar to the FHWA programs, the transit funding authorized by MAP-21 is managed in several

ways. The largest amount is distributed to the states or to large metropolitan areas by formula.

Other program funds are discretionary, and some are earmarked for specific projects. Program

funds include the following:

Statewide Transportation Planning Program (Section 5304): These funds come to

the state based on population and are used to support transportation planning projects

in non-urbanized areas.

Capital Investment Program (Section 5309): The transit discretionary program

provides Federal assistance for major capital needs, such as fleet replacement and

construction of transit facilities. All transit systems in the state are eligible for this

program. In recent years, Congress has earmarked all of these funds for specific

projects or geographic regions.

Special Needs Program (Section 5310): Funding is provided through this program

to increase the mobility for the elderly and persons with disabilities. Part of the

funding is administered along with the Non-Urbanized funding; another part is

allocated among urbanized transit systems.

Non-Urbanized Area Formula Program (Section 5311): This program provides

capital and operating assistance for rural and small urban transit systems. Fifteen

percent of these funds are allocated to Intercity Bus projects. A portion of the funding

is also allocated to support rural transit planning.

Rural Transit Assistance Program (RTAP - Section 5311(b)(3)): This funding is

also used for statewide training events and to support transit funding fellowships for

regional and small urban transit staff or planners.

19

Bus and Bus Facilities Program (5339): This formula program provides federal

assistance for major capital needs, such as fleet replacement and construction of

transit facilities. All transit systems in the state are eligible for this program.

Flexible Funds: Certain Title 23 funds may be used for transit purposes. Transit

capital assistance is an eligible use of STP funds. Transit capital and start-up operating

assistance is an eligible use of ICAAP funds. When ICAAP and STP funds are

programmed for transit projects, they are transferred to the FTA. The ICAAP funds are

applied for and administered by the Office of Public Transit.

State Transit Assistance (STA): All public transit systems are eligible for funding.

These funds can be used by the public transit system for operating, capital, or planning

expenses related to the provision of open-to-the-public passenger transportation.

FHWA Funding Transferred to FTA

STP funds designated for transit investments are required to be transferred from FHWA to FTA for

administration. These projects must be programmed in the highway (FHWA) and transit (FTA)

section of the TIP in the FFY they are to be transferred. The process is initiated with a letter from

the RPA/MPO to the Iowa DOT’s Office of Program Management and to the Office of Public Transit

requesting the transfer of funds. The Office of Program Management will then review the request

and submit it to FHWA for processing.

STP funds used for planning efforts require projects to be included in the CIRTPA’s Unified Planning

Work Program and TIP. Funds will be transferred to a Consolidated Planning Grant by request of

the Office of Systems Planning.

Finally, transit projects receiving awards through the ICAAP also require a transfer of funds. The

process for these types of transfers is the same as transferring STP funds for transit investments,

except that no letter from the RPA/MPO requesting the transfer is required.

20

CHAPTER FOUR

Federal Fiscal Year 2015 Status Reports

The following are status reports of all Federal-aid projects programmed to utilize FHWA or FTA

funds in FFY 2015. The status of projects may include a notice of receiving Federal authorization,

letting, canceling, rolling over, or scheduled letting before October 1, 2015.

TABLE 4.1 City of Boone

Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status

STP STP-U-0750(630)—70-08 On Marion Street, from 10

th Street to 12

th Street

Pavement Rehabilitation 26683

Letting June FFY

2015

STP STP-U-0750()—70-08 On Benton Street, from Mamie Eisenhower Ave to 8

th St

33897 Authorized FFY 2015

TABLE 4.2 Boone County


DEMO HDP-C008()--6B-08 200th St.: From Des Moines River to Sec. 27-84-27 14334 Roll to FFY

2016

STP STP-S-C008(66)—5E-08 On E-41, from Ringold St in City of Boone to 1.1 miles west of Boone City Limits

21303 Let

February FFY 2015

STP-HBP BRS-C008(65)—60-08 On E-26, Over Beaver Creek, in S9 T84 R28 28172 Letting

September FFY 2015

TABLE 4.3 Dallas County


RTP NRT-C025(95)--9G-25 Hiawatha Trail: Raccoon River Valley Trail to High Trestle Trail Connection

25425 Roll to FFY

2016

TAP TAP-R-C025(98--9T-25 RRVT Paved Crossing Project, Phase 2 29722 Let July

FFY 2015

21

HSIP HSIP-S-C025(97)—6C-25 On F90, P46, P58, R16, R22 & 323rd

Pl. 29817 Authorized FFY 2015

TABLE 4.4 Iowa Department of Transportation


NEPA NEPA-030-5(244)—81-85 US30 from I-35 to 11st St in Nevada 29714 Ongoing

HSIP HSIP—014()—2H-50 014: Newton to CO Rd F17 29589 Let

NHPP NHSX—065()—3H-91 065: S JCT CO RD G58 to US 69 29595 Let

NHPP NHSX—014()—3H-50 014: CO RD 17 To 1.6 MI W of IA 224 29585 Let

NHPP IM-35()—13-91 I-35: North River 3.8 Miles North of IA 92 (NB) 13887 Let

STP-HBP BRF—35()—38-91 I-35: IA 92 Over I-35(EB) 16923 Let

NHPP IM-35()—13-91 I-35: IA 92 Over I-35 (WB) 18576 Let

PRF STPN—92()—2J-91 IA 92: W of CO RD R57 to E of S N STIN Indianola (State Share)

18579 Let

NHPP IM--80()—13-50 I-80: Rest Area East of CO RD T-38 (WB) 13870 Let

NHPP IM—35()—13-91 I-35: Clanton Creek to N of IA 92 (NB) 20893 Row

Underway

STP-HBP BRF—65()—38-91 US65: South River, 2.0 MI S of IA 92 22020 Row

Underway

NHPP IMX-080-5(338)155—02-50 On I80, from W of IA 117 to E. of Iowa Speedway Drive (EB&WB Shoulders)

30861 Let

PRF BRFN—65()—39-91 US65: Stream, 0.2 Mi N of CO RD G24(SB) 22021 Let May 15

PRF NHSN—014()—2R-50 014: 2 Mi E of CO RD F17 25322 Let

PRF BRFN—30()—39-08 US 30: Middle Beaver Creek 0.4 Mi WOF Us 169 20880 Let

PRF BRFN—169()—39-25 US 169: Stream 2.9 Mi S of IA 141 20882 Let

PRF BRFN—80()—39-25 080: South Raccoon River, 1.5 Mi E of US 169 29581 Let

PRF STP—069()—2J-85 069: S of IA 210 to SCL of AMES 29594 Let

STP-HBP BRF—6()—38-25 US 6: South Raccoon River 1.1 Mi N of I-80 20881 Let

22

TABLE 4.5 City of Huxley


TAP TAP-U-3630(91)--8I-85 Heart of Iowa Nature Trail, From Highway 69 to Trailridge Park

25425 Letting July

FFY 2015

TABLE 4.6 City of Indianola


STP STP-3680(616)—2C-91 ON U.S. 65/69, from S of Hillcrest Ave to N of Hoover St and Hillcrest Ave from 300ft W to 1300ft E of U.S. 65/69

26588 Let

TABLE 4.7 Jasper County


STP-HBP BRS-C050()—60-50 On County Road F17, Over The North Skunk River, approximately 500 feet west of State Hwy 14, along NLINE S21 T81 R19

27020 Roll to FFY

2016

HSIP HSIP-S-C050(107)—6C-50 On various, Mill-in Edge Line Pavement markings and Centerline pavement markings using High Build Waterborne Paint

29712 Letting in June FFY

2015

TABLE 4.8 City of Knoxville


STP STP-U-4040()—27-63 On Robinson Street, from Highway 14 to Kent Street and 4

th Street to Attica Road

26684 Roll to FFY

2016

TABLE 4.9 Madison County


STP-HBR BROS-C061(99)—8j-61 Larkspur Ave: Over S FORK CLANTON CREEK 16295 Let May FFY 2015

HSIP HSIP-S-C061(100)—6C-61 On VARIOUS ROUTES 29324 Let

STP-HBR BROS-C061(96)—8J-61 ALL: From VARIOUS to VARIOUS 20604 Let

23

TABLE 4.10 Marion County


HSIP HSIP-S-C063(117)—6C-63 On Various, from Countywide to Countywide 27048 Let

November FFY 2014

STP-HBP BROS-C063(115)—8J-63 On Hayes Dr, from Pvile to 20

th (approx. 4000 ft W

of Hwy 5) 21340

Let November FFY 2014

STP-HBP BROS-C063(119)—5F-63 On Coolidge St., Over BNSF RR, from IA 316 to Swan, on NLINE S19 T77N R21W

27045 Roll to FFY

2016

TABLE 4.11 City of Melcher-Dallas


STP-HBP BRM-4937(601)--8N-63 Main Street East of S-45: Over the Union Pacific Railroad

14625 Remove from TIP

TABLE 4.12 City of Mingo


STP-HBP BROS-5110(601)—8J-50 West Railroad Street, just west of Lincoln St, Over Stream

29811 Roll to FFY

2016

TABLE 4.13 City of Newton


STP STP-U-5482(617)--70-50 E 31st St N: From 360 ft North of 1

st Ave E to 970 ft

South of N 19th

Ave E 22113

Let April FFY 2015

TAP STP-E-5482(618)--8V-50 North Newton Hike and Bike Trail: 1.1 mile of 8 ft wide trail from Woodland Park to E 12 St N

25495 Letting July

FFY 2015

STP-HBP BROS-5482(616)--8J-50 S 12th Avenue: bridge replacement project 25368 Letting

August FFY 2015

TABLE 4.14 City of Pella


STP STP-U-5947(615)—70-63 On OSKALOOSA ST, from Prairie Street to SE 16th

St 17060 Letting

August FFY 2015

24

TABLE 4.15 City of Perry


STP-HBP BRM-5970(615)—8N-25 In the city of Perry, Willis Avenue Bridge over Frog Creek (Bridge # 503845)

32232 Roll to FFY

2016

STP STP-U-5970(616)—70-25 NORTH ST: From 16th

St to 18th

St 20809 Roll to FFY

2016

TABLE 4.16 Story County


HSIP HSIP-S-C085(124)—6C-85 On Various routes, 28.48 Miles 29264 Let

January FFY 2015

STP STP-S-C085(125)—5E-85 On R-70, from Polk Co. Line to 650’ north of 320

th

St, at S33 T82 R23 12400

Let February FFY 2015

STP STP-S-C085(126)—5E-85 S27: From Hwy 210 to Polk Co. Line 18037 Let

February FFY 2015

STP-HBP BROS-C085(118)—8J-85 280th

ST: Over West Indian Creek 20536 Let

November FFY 2014

STP-HBP BROS-C085(119)—5F-85 640th

Ave.: Over East Indian Creek 24810 Let

January FFY 2015

STP-HBP BROS-C085(123)—8J85 On 250

th St., Over East Indian Creek, on NLINE S23

T83 R22 26812

Let February FFY 2015

TABLE 4.17 Warren County


STP-HBP BROS-C091(94)—5F-91 ON G48 (McKinley St.) 0.1 miles west of 210

th Ave.

over Coal Creek 24854

Let April FFY 2015

STP-HBP BROS-C091(92)—5F-91 On R-63, Over MIDDLE RIVER, at SE S4 T76 R24 24887 Authorized FFY 2015

25

TABLE 4.18 Heart of Iowa Regional Transit Authority

Fund Category Project Description Transit # Status STA, 5310, 5311 Administration/Operation/Maintenance 3038 On-going

5316 Rural Mobility Coordinator 2920 On-going 5339 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) 1560 Not Complete 5339 Light Duty Bus (158" wb) 3228 Not Complete 5339 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) 3231 Not Complete 5339 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) 2881 Not Complete 5339 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) 1569 Not Complete 5339 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) 3237 Not Complete 5339 Minivan 3239 Not Complete 5339 Minivan 1580 Not Complete 5339 Minivan 1561 Not Complete 5339 Minivan 2882 Not Complete 5339 Minivan 3227 Not Complete STA ITS / Tablets, cases, brackets and

installation 3460 Complete

26

CHAPTER FIVE

Federal Highway Administration Projects

The first FFY in the FFY 2016-2019 TIP is referred to as the Annual Element. Projects for the entire

four years (FFY 2016-2019) are listed together by funding program and in order of FFY. The

CIRTPA’s program for FFY 2016-2019 contains 127 projects with a total cost of approximately

$231,313,000. Of the 127 projects in the CIRTPA’s program, 124 projects totaling $230,326,000 are

roadway transportation improvements. Three projects totaling $987,000 are bicycle and

pedestrian improvements.

Program Format

The project listing is organized by TIP funding program. The sponsor name, project number, project

location, project description, project funding, programmed amounts in $1,000s by year, and

Transportation Program Management System (TPMS) identification number are shown for each

project within the different TIP funding categories. The TPMS identification number is a unique

number given to each project included in the CIRTPA’s TIP.

Projects are listed in alphabetical order by county, then by city. Project funding amounts are listed

by year and are listed in $1,000s. Project Total refers to the total cost of the project. Federal Aid

refers to the amount of Federal-aid the project has received. Regional FA (Federal-aid) refers to the

amount of Federal-aid received from the CIRTPA (i.e., STP and TAP funds).

27

Generated on 07/15/2015

Draft TIP (2016) (filtered)

RPA-11

28

RPA-11 2016 - 2019 Transportation Improvement Program

TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Total STIP#STP - Surface Transportation ProgramBoone - 08 33897 STP-U-0750()--70-08 0 Project Total 1,180 0 0 0 1,180Boone In the city of Boone, On Benton Street, from Mamie

Eisenhower Ave to 8th St-- Federal Aid 944 0 0 0 944

Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab,Outside Services Engineering -- Regional FA 944 0 0 0 944 --PA NOTE: $32,000 for design and engineering programmed for FFY 2015

9917 STP-S-C008(36)--5E-08 DOT Letting: 01/20/2016 2.998 MI Project Total 1,200 0 0 0 1,200Boone CRD E-18: From Greene County to Hwy 169 -- Federal Aid 960 0 0 0 960Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 20:85:28 Regional FA 960 0 0 0 960 --21305 STP-S-C008(62)--5E-08 1 MI Project Total 0 310 0 0 310Boone CRD E-57: X Ave E 1 MI to Y Ave -- Federal Aid 0 248 0 0 248Draft TIP Approved Pave 25/36:83:25 Regional FA 0 248 0 0 248 --

21306 STP-S-C008(63)--5E-08 2.7 MI Project Total 0 830 0 0 830Boone CRD R-27: E-52 N 2.7 MI to Hwy 30 -- Federal Aid 0 664 0 0 664Draft TIP Approved Pave 2,11,14:83:26 Regional FA 0 664 0 0 664 --

23591 STP-S-C008(67)--5E-08 0.676 MI Project Total 0 0 0 1,400 1,400Boone CRD On Lower Ledges Rd and E-52, from Lower Ledges

Easterly 4.2 Miles to Hwy 17-- Federal Aid 0 0 0 1,120 1,120

Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 0 0 1,120 1,120 --

31071 STP-S-C008(71)--5E-08 4.5 MI Project Total 0 0 0 1,500 1,500Boone CRD On E57, from P-54 in Berkley east 4.5 Miles to Hwy.

169, along NLINE S4,3,2,1,6 T82 R28 -- Federal Aid 0 0 0 1,200 1,200

Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 4,3,2,1,6:82:28 Regional FA 0 0 0 1,200 1,200 --

Dallas - 25 7139 STP-S-C025(102)--5E-25 DOT Letting: 12/15/2015 6 MI Project Total 4,000 0 0 0 4,000Dallas CRD On F-31, from Minburn to R-22 & intersection -- Federal Aid 3,200 0 0 0 3,200Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 3,200 0 0 0 3,200 --

20809 STP-U-5970(616)--70-25 DOT Letting: 11/17/2015 0 MI Project Total 1,614 0 0 0 1,614Perry NORTH ST: From 16TH ST to 18TH ST -- Federal Aid 1,291 0 0 0 1,291Draft TIP Approved Pave 0:0:0 Regional FA 1,291 0 0 0 1,291 --

27115 STP-S-C025(AE-4)--5E-25 3 MI Project Total 0 0 1,600 0 1,600Dallas CRD On F25, from Guthrie Co. to P46 -- Federal Aid 0 0 800 0 800Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 0 800 0 800 --

29

TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Total STIP#Jasper - 50 29307 STP-U-5482()--70-50 0 Project Total 850 0 0 0 850Newton In the city of Newton, N 4th Avenue W, from W 8th

Street to State Highway 14-- Federal Aid 680 0 0 0 680

Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 680 0 0 0 680 --

23674 STP-S-C050()--5E-50 9 MI Project Total 0 1,650 0 0 1,650Jasper CRD F27 from Hwy 224 east approx. 3 mi, F62 from T22

east approx. 2 mi, and S 44th Ave E & W from Hwy 14east approx. 4 mi

-- Federal Aid0 1,320 0 0 1,320

Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 1,320 0 0 1,320 --32261 STP-S-C050()--5E-50 5.5 MI Project Total 0 2,750 0 0 2,750Jasper CRD On County Road F36, from County road S52 east

approx. 5.5 Miles to Cherry Creek Bridge-- Federal Aid 0 2,200 0 0 2,200

Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 2,200 0 0 2,200 --29505 STP-U-5482()--70-50 0 Project Total 0 0 1,500 0 1,500Newton Union Drive Reconstruction, from N 4th Avenue W to

N 19th Avenue W-- Federal Aid 0 0 1,200 0 1,200

Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 0 1,200 0 1,200 --

Madison - 61 29330 STP-S-C061()--5E-61 10.175 Project Total 0 4,000 0 0 4,000Madison CRD On G4R, from US169 EAST AND NORTH APPROX.

12 Miles to TIMBER RIDGE AVE-- Federal Aid 0 2,000 0 0 2,000

Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 18:76:27 Regional FA 0 2,000 0 0 2,000 --

26681 STP-U-8497()--27-61 0 Project Total 0 500 0 0 500Winterset On Summitt Avenue, from 1st Street to 16th Avenue -- Federal Aid 0 400 0 0 400Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab/Widen -- Regional FA 0 400 0 0 400 --

Marion - 63 26684 STP-U-4040()--27-63 0 Project Total 369 0 0 0 369Knoxville On Robinson Street, from Highway 14 to Kent Street

and 4th Street to Attica Road-- Federal Aid 295 0 0 0 295

Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab,Ped/Bike Miscellaneous -- Regional FA 295 0 0 0 295 --

26686 STP-U-4040()--27-63 0 Project Total 436 0 0 0 436Knoxville On Jackson Street and Long Lane, from Highway 14 to

Grant Street (Long Lane) and Grant Street to RocheStreet (Jackson Street)

-- Federal Aid349 0 0 0 349

Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 349 0 0 0 349 --

30

TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Total STIP#Marion - 63 (continued) 26685 STP-U-4040()--27-63 0 Project Total 0 206 0 0 206Knoxville On Pleasant Street, from McKinley Street to Roche

Street-- Federal Aid 0 165 0 0 165


18962 STP-S-C063(S-45 OL)--5E-63 8.544 MI Project Total 0 1,500 0 0 1,500Marion CRD On S45, from Melcher Dallas city limits to Hwy5 -- Federal Aid 0 1,200 0 0 1,200Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 15:75:21 Regional FA 0 1,200 0 0 1,200 --

27071 STP-S-C063(T17 OL)--5E-63 4 MI Project Total 0 0 2,300 0 2,300Marion CRD On T17, from IA 92 to Pella Co. Line -- Federal Aid 0 0 1,200 0 1,200Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab,Patching -- Regional FA 0 0 1,200 0 1,200 --

Polk - 77 15459 STP-S-C077(Yod-134)--5E-77 5 MI Project Total 1,100 0 0 0 1,100Polk CRD On NE Yoder Dr/NE 134 Ave, from NE 72 St to NE

112 St-- Federal Aid 748 0 0 0 748

Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 30:81:22 Regional FA 748 0 0 0 748 --

26601 STP-S-C077(Mad-CL)--5E-77 6 MI Project Total 0 0 1,078 0 1,078Polk CRD On NW Madrid Dr, from BR 132 to Hwy 17 -- Federal Aid 0 0 862 0 862Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 17:81:25 Regional FA 0 0 862 0 862 --

Story - 85 32334 STP-S-C085(135)--5E-85 DOT Letting: 11/17/2015 3.25 MI Project Total 700 0 0 0 700Story CRD On E63, from approx. 870 feet NE of the Cambridge

City Limits east approx. 3.25 Miles to S14-- Federal Aid 560 0 0 0 560


32335 STP-S-C085(133)--5E-85 DOT Letting: 11/17/2015 3.5 MI Project Total 800 0 0 0 800Story CRD On E63, from R38 east approx. 3.5 Miles to N. 5th Ave.

in Huxley-- Federal Aid 640 0 0 0 640

Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 29:82:24 Regional FA 640 0 0 0 640 --

29689 STP-S-C085(R77)--5E-85 2.5 MI Project Total 0 600 0 0 600 TA

Story CRD On R77, from Roland City Limits North 2.5 Miles toHamilton Co. Line

-- Federal Aid 0 480 0 0 480

Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab/Widen -- Regional FA 0 480 0 0 480 --

26694 STP-U-5405()--27-85 0 Project Total 0 0 0 1,500 1,500Nevada On US Highway 30 Interchange -- Federal Aid 0 0 0 1,200 1,200Draft TIP Approved Miscellaneous -- Regional FA 0 0 0 1,200 1,200 --

31

TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Total STIP#Warren - 91 21858 STP-S-C091(G76el)--5E-91 4.086 MI Project Total 1,600 0 0 0 1,600Warren CRD On G76, from US Hwy 65 east approx. 4.1 Miles to G72 -- Federal Aid 800 0 0 0 800Draft TIP Approved Pave,Pavement Rehab,Patching -- Regional FA 800 0 0 0 800 --9620 STP-U-3680(614)--70-91 DOT Letting: 01/21/2026 0.109 MI Project Total 0 765 0 0 765Indianola In the city of Indianola, On S J & K ST, from approx.

600' N OF IA 92 to approx 500' S OF IA 92-- Federal Aid 0 500 0 0 500

Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Traffic Signals,Right of Way -- Regional FA 0 500 0 0 500 --

20773 STP-S-C091(G76)--5E-91 4.7 MI Project Total 0 2,000 0 0 2,000Warren CRD On G76, from G72 east approx. 4.7 Miles to 10th

Avenue (county line)-- Federal Aid 0 500 0 0 500

Draft TIP Approved Pave,Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 500 0 0 500 --19707 STP-S-C091(R63n)--5E-91 2 MI Project Total 0 0 1,040 0 1,040Warren CRD R-63: From North River to DM CITY LIMIT -- Federal Aid 0 0 832 0 832Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 16:77:24 Regional FA 0 0 832 0 832 --21860 STP-S-C091(G58)--5E-91 2.903 MI Project Total 0 0 0 1,260 1,260 TA

Warren CRD G58, from Hwy 65 to S23 -- Federal Aid 0 0 0 700 700Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 23:75:23 Regional FA 0 0 0 700 700 --STP-HBP - Surface Transportation Program - Bridge ProgramBoone - 08 23638 [NBIS: 077350] BROS-C008(63)--8J-08 DOT Letting: 06/20/2017 0 MI Project Total 0 400 0 0 400Boone CRD Montana Road: From 1 mile S. of 224th Lane to 1.25

miles S. of 224th Lane077350 Federal Aid 0 320 0 0 320

Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 7:83:26 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

31054 [NBIS: 78150] BROS-C008(69)--5F-08 42008 MI Project Total 0 300 0 0 300Boone CRD On 110TH ST, Over TRIB.OF SQUAW CREEK, on

NLINE S10 T85 R25 78150 Federal Aid 0 240 0 0 240

Draft TIP Approved Culvert Replacement 10:85:25 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

31069 [NBIS: 78220] BROS-C008(70)--8J-08 0 Project Total 0 0 400 0 400Boone CRD On U AVE, Over MONTGOMERY CREEK, along

WLINE S33 T85 R25 78220 Federal Aid 0 0 320 0 320


13719 [NBIS: 78010] BROS-C008(48)--5F-8 DOT Letting: 09/18/2018 0 MI Project Total 0 0 400 0 400Boone CRD 190th Street: Over BEAVER CREEK 78010 Federal Aid 0 0 320 0 320Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 22:84:28 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

32

TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Total STIP#Boone - 08 (continued) 9916 [NBIS: 78050] BROS-C008(33)--8J-8 DOT Letting: 06/18/2019 0 MI Project Total 0 0 0 400 400Boone CRD On 200th Street: approx. 1/4 mi. east of C Ave. 78050 Federal Aid 0 0 0 320 320Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 28:84:28 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --12129 [NBIS: 77940] BROS-C008(41)--8J-8 DOT Letting: 06/18/2019 0 MI Project Total 0 0 0 400 400Boone CRD 180th Street: Hwy 169 77940 Federal Aid 0 0 0 320 320Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 16:84:28 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --Dallas - 25 27116 [NBIS: 132421] BROS-C025(101)--5F-25 DOT Letting: 12/15/2015 0 MI Project Total 500 0 0 0 500Dallas CRD On R30, Over Little Beaver Ck., along SLINE S3 T81

R27 132421 Federal Aid 400 0 0 0 400


32232 BRM-5970(615)--8N-25 DOT Letting: 05/17/2016 0 Project Total 550 0 0 0 550Perry In the city of Perry, Willis Avenue Bridge over Frog

Creek (Bridge # 503845)-- Federal Aid 440 0 0 0 440

Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

32546 [NBIS: 131480] BROS-C025(M-79)--5F-25 0 Project Total 0 500 0 0 500Dallas CRD On 358th Pl., Over Bear Creek, in S25 T78 R29 131480 Federal Aid 0 400 0 0 400Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 25:78:29 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

24907 [NBIS: 132490] BROS-C025(C-39)--5F-25 0 MI Project Total 0 0 300 0 300Dallas CRD On Pioneer Av., Over Slough Creek, along WLINE S27

T81 R27 132490 Federal Aid 0 0 240 0 240


Jasper - 50 15529 [NBIS: 197720] BROS-C050()--5F-50 0 MI Project Total 750 0 0 0 750Jasper CRD Hwy T-12: Over North Skunk River 197720 Federal Aid 600 0 0 0 600Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 6:80:18 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --27020 [NBIS: 030820] BRS-C050()--60-50 0.1 MI Project Total 140 0 0 0 140Jasper CRD On County Road F17, Over The North Skunk

River, approximately 500 feet west of State Hwy 14,along NLINE S21 T81 R19

030820 Federal Aid112 0 0 0 112


27021 [NBIS: 030380] BRS-C050()--60-50 0.1 MI Project Total 120 0 0 0 120Jasper CRD On County Road F48, Over Squaw Creek, just of W

116th St S, on NLINE S11 T79 R21 030380 Federal Aid 96 0 0 0 96

Draft TIP Approved Bridge Rehabilitation 11:79:21 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

33

TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Total STIP#Jasper - 50 (continued) 27026 [NBIS: 197840] BROS-C050(601)--8J-50 DOT Letting: 02/16/2016 0.1 MI Project Total 400 0 0 0 400Jasper CRD On Indigo Ave, Over Coon Creek, from State Hwy 224

east 500 Feet, along NLINE S25 T80 R18 197840 Federal Aid 320 0 0 0 320


32209 [NBIS: 196420] BROS-C050()--5F-50 0.01 MI Project Total 300 0 0 0 300Jasper CRD On S 64th Ave E, Over Sugar Creek, in S25 T79 R17 196420 Federal Aid 240 0 0 0 240Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 25:79:17 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --29811 BROS-5110(601)--8J-50 0 Project Total 400 0 0 0 400Mingo West Railroad Street, just west of Lincoln St, Over

Stream-- Federal Aid 320 0 0 0 320

Draft TIP Approved Bridge Rehabilitation -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --27025 [NBIS: 198460] BRS-C050()--60-50 0.1 MI Project Total 0 750 0 0 750Jasper CRD On County Road F24, Over Indian Creek, along NLINE

S3 T80 R21 approximately 500 east of State Hwy 117198460 Federal Aid 0 600 0 0 600


15535 [NBIS: 199660] BROS-C050( )--8J-50 0.02 MI Project Total 0 225 0 0 225Jasper CRD On N 91st Ave W, Over Wolf Creek, at NLINE S20

T81 R21 199660 Federal Aid 0 180 0 0 180

Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 20:81:21 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --27029 [NBIS: 030450] BRS-C050()--60-50 0.1 MI Project Total 0 0 400 0 400Jasper CRD On County Road F48, Over Cherry Creek, from W 36th

St east 300 Feet, in S32 T80 R19 030450 Federal Aid 0 0 320 0 320


15531 [NBIS: 30430] BRS-C050()--60-50 0 MI Project Total 0 0 150 0 150Jasper CRD F-48: Over Prairie Creek 30430 Federal Aid 0 0 120 0 120Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 34:80:20 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --15532 [NBIS: 198441] BHS-C050()--63-50 0.2 MI Project Total 0 0 150 0 150Jasper CRD On F-24, Over Clear Creek, along NLINE S2 T80 R21 198441 Federal Aid 0 0 120 0 120Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 2:80:21 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

Madison - 61 25107 BROS-C061()--8J-61 0 MI Project Total 90 0 0 0 90Madison CRD ALL: From VARIOUS to VARIOUS -- Federal Aid 72 0 0 0 72Draft TIP Approved Outside Services Bridge Inspection -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --29329 [NBIS: 234970] BHOS-C061()--89-61 0 MI Project Total 650 0 0 0 650Madison CRD On HERITAGE AVE, Over N BRANCH NORTH

RIVER, S17 T77 R28 234970 Federal Aid 520 0 0 0 520


34

TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Total STIP#Madison - 61 (continued) 25111 BROS-C061()--8J-61 0 MI Project Total 0 90 0 0 90Madison CRD ALL: From VARIOUS to VARIOUS -- Federal Aid 0 72 0 0 72Draft TIP Approved Outside Services Bridge Inspection -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --29319 [NBIS: 235110] BROS-C061()--8J-61 0.03 MI Project Total 0 650 0 0 650Madison CRD On COTTONWOOD AVE, Over N BR NORTH

RIVER, at SE S5 T77 R29 235110 Federal Aid 0 520 0 0 520


20605 BROS-C061()--8J-61 0 MI Project Total 0 0 90 0 90Madison CRD ALL: From VARIOUS to VARIOUS -- Federal Aid 0 0 72 0 72Draft TIP Approved Outside Services Bridge Inspection -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --25117 [NBIS: 232320] BRS-C061()--60-61 0.05 MI Project Total 0 0 0 750 750Madison CRD On G61, Over N FORK CLANTON CREEK, from

HOMESTEAD AVE. EAST 1/2 Miles to BRIDGELOCATION, at NE S17 T74 R28

232320 Federal Aid0 0 0 600 600


20108 BROS-C061(91)--8J-61 Finished 0 MI Project Total 0 0 0 90 90Madison CRD ALL: From VARIOUS to VARIOUS -- Federal Aid 0 0 0 72 72Draft TIP Approved Outside Services Bridge Inspection -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --Marion - 63 27045 [NBIS: 241470] BROS-C063(119)--5F-63 DOT Letting: 04/19/2016 0 MI Project Total 1,100 0 0 0 1,100Marion CRD On Coolidge St., Over BNSF RR, from IA 316 to Swan,

on NLINE S19 T77N R21W 241470 Federal Aid 880 0 0 0 880

Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 19:77N:21W Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

8331 [NBIS: 239100] BROS-C063(4016670)--8J-63 0 MI Project Total 0 450 0 0 450Marion CRD Story Dr.: From G-76 to 94th 239100 Federal Aid 0 360 0 0 360Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 16:74:20 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

Polk - 77 32538 [NBIS: 282340] BRS-C077(BR1837)--60-77 0 Project Total 0 400 0 0 400Polk CRD On NE 96 St, Over INDIAN CREEK S of NE 166 Ave 282340 Federal Aid 0 320 0 0 320Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

7899 [NBIS: 281730] BRS-C077(115)--60-77 DOT Letting: 12/19/2017 0 MI Project Total 0 1,020 0 0 1,020Polk CRD NE 82 Ave: From W of to NE 109 St 281730 Federal Aid 0 816 0 0 816Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 26:80:22 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --26603 [NBIS: 281690] BROS-C077(BR4264)--5F-77 0 MI Project Total 0 0 0 500 500Polk CRD On NE 94 Ave E of NE 112 St 281690 Federal Aid 0 0 0 400 400Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

35

TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Total STIP#Story - 85 24816 [NBIS: 313820] BROS-C085(127)--8J-85 DOT Letting: 11/17/2015 0.1 MI Project Total 350 0 0 0 350Story CRD On 660th Ave., Over Rock Creek, at SE S22 T82 R22 313820 Federal Aid 280 0 0 0 280Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 22:82:22 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

29593 [NBIS: 049200] BRF--035()--38-85 1.6 MI Project Total 0 2,446 0 0 2,446DOT-D01-RPA11 035: CO RD E57 OVER I-35, 2 MI S OFUS 30 049200 Federal Aid 0 2,201 0 0 2,201Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

32520 [NBIS: 314120] BROS-C085(U17)--8J-85 0.1 MI Project Total 0 0 400 0 400Story CRD On 570th Ave., Over Ballard Creek, along WLINE S17

T82 R23 314120 Federal Aid 0 0 320 0 320


29272 [NBIS: 316000] BRS-C085(W19)--60-85 0.1 MI Project Total 0 0 0 350 350Story CRD On E18, Over Drainage Ditch, on NLINE S19 T85 R22 316000 Federal Aid 0 0 0 280 280Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 19:85:22 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

Warren - 91 25344 [NBIS: 050910] BRF--065()--38-91 0 Project Total 1,803 0 0 0 1,803DOT-D05-RPA11 065: MIDDLE RIVER, 0.4 MI S OF CO RD G24 (NB) 050910 Federal Aid 1,442 0 0 0 1,442Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement,Wetland Mitigation -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

22020 [NBIS: 050890] BRF--65()--38-91 0 Project Total 4,452 0 0 0 4,452DOT-D05-RPA11 US65: SOUTH RIVER, 2.0 MI S OF IA 92 050890 Federal Aid 3,562 0 0 0 3,562Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Bridge Replacement,Wetland Mitigation -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

20774 [NBIS: 333600] BROS-C091(102)--5F-91 DOT Letting: 11/17/2015 0 MI Project Total 240 0 0 0 240Warren CRD 210th Ave: About 0.1 MI north of Polk St 333600 Federal Aid 192 0 0 0 192Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 28:75:22 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

30867 [NBIS: 333040] BRS-C091(101)--60-91 DOT Letting: 03/15/2016 0 Project Total 1,200 0 0 0 1,200Warren CRD On G76, Over OTTER CREEK, at NE S30 T74 R23 333040 Federal Aid 960 0 0 0 960Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 30:74:23 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --12579 [NBIS: 334560] BROS-C091(63)--8J-91 DOT Letting: 11/17/2015 0 MI Project Total 550 0 0 0 550Warren CRD On HOOVER ST, Over CAVITT CREEK, at ne1/4 S14

T76 R24 334560 Federal Aid 440 0 0 0 440


24858 [NBIS: 332660] BROS-C091(100)--5F-91 DOT Letting: 03/15/2016 0.2 MI Project Total 550 0 0 0 550Warren CRD On G62/Roosevelt St. at 230th Ave., over Flank Creek,

at, W 0.1, at SW S2 T74 R22 332660 Federal Aid 440 0 0 0 440


36

TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Total STIP#Warren - 91 (continued) 29277 [NBIS: 332610] BROS-C091(103)--5F-91 DOT Letting: 11/17/2015 0 Project Total 360 0 0 0 360Warren CRD On 190TH AVE, over North Wolf Creek, from 190TH

ST & TYLER ST NORTH 1.1 Miles, S7 T74 R22332610 Federal Aid 288 0 0 0 288


13886 [NBIS: 051350] BRF--35()--38-91 0 Project Total 0 3,853 0 0 3,853DOT-D05-RPA11 I-35: MIDDLE RIVER 0.4 MILE SOUTHOF IA 92

(SB)051350 Federal Aid 0 3,468 0 0 3,468

Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

24855 [NBIS: 334360] BROS-C091(G1309)--5F-91 0.1 MI Project Total 0 250 0 0 250Warren CRD On 180TH AVE, N approx. 0.1 mi 334360 Federal Aid 0 200 0 0 200Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 13:76:23 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

15419 [NBIS: 335350] BROS-C091(C3559)--5F-91 0.2 MI Project Total 0 1,200 0 0 1,200Warren CRD 115th Ave.: G24 Hwy S 0.95 MI 335350 Federal Aid 0 960 0 0 960Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 35:77:24 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

29369 [NBIS: 333320] BRS-C091(N0302)--60-91 0 Project Total 0 0 1,000 0 1,000Warren CRD On R45, from Roosevelt St. north approx. 0.4 Miles 333320 Federal Aid 0 0 800 0 800Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

29370 [NBIS: 333370] BRS-C091(N1033)--60-91 0 Project Total 0 0 1,000 0 1,000Warren CRD On R45, from Roosevelt St. south approx. 0.3 Miles 333370 Federal Aid 0 0 800 0 800Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 10:74:25 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

24882 [NBIS: 334050] BROS-C091(M2452)--5F-91 0 MI Project Total 0 0 525 0 525Warren CRD 65TH AVE: Over PAINTER CREEK 334050 Federal Aid 0 0 420 0 420Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 24:75:25 Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --29279 [NBIS: 334830] BROS-C091(E3325)--5F-91 0.1 MI Project Total 0 0 0 280 280Warren CRD On KIRKWOOD ST NEAR 33RD AVE, Over

UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO MIDDLE RIVER, from33RD AVE WEST 0.1 Miles, S33 T76 R25

334830 Federal Aid0 0 0 224 224


29280 [NBIS: 334450] BROS-C091(F0253)--5F-91 0.1 MI Project Total 0 0 0 250 250Warren CRD On 115TH AVE, Over CAVITT CREEK, from 115TH

AVE & FULTON ST SOUTH 0.25 Miles, S2 T76 R24 334450 Federal Aid 0 0 0 200 200


29283 [NBIS: 335160] BROS-C091(B3474)--5F-91 0.1 MI Project Total 0 0 0 300 300Warren CRD On 168TH AVE, from 168TH AVE & FULTON ST

NORTH APPROX. 0.75 Miles335160 Federal Aid 0 0 0 225 225


37

TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Total STIP#NHPP - National Highway Performance ProgramDallas - 25 34010 NHSX--169()--3H-25 1 MI Project Total 1,300 0 0 0 1,300DOT-D04-RPA11 169: IN DE SOTO, FROM SCL TO N OF ASH ST -- Federal Aid 1,040 0 0 0 1,040Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

34007 IM--080()--13-25 22.3 MI Project Total 0 0 0 21,037 21,037DOT-D04-RPA11 080: CO RD P53/F60 INTERCHANGE TO 60TH ST

IN WEST DES MOINES (EB)-- Federal Aid 0 0 0 18,933 18,933

Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

Jasper - 50 29588 NHSX--065()--3H-50 0.1 MI Project Total 0 8,270 6,143 298 14,711DOT-D01-RPA11 065: IA 330 & IA 117 INTERCHANGE -- Federal Aid 0 6,616 4,914 0 11,530Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Grading,Right of Way -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

29586 [NBIS: 031220] IM--080()--13-50 0.1 MI Project Total 0 0 632 7,016 7,648DOT-D01-RPA11 080: NORTH SKUNK RIVER, 2.1 MI E OFIA 224 031220 Federal Aid 0 0 0 6,314 6,314Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement,Grading,Right of Way -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

Polk - 77 29590 IM--35()--13-77 0 Project Total 0 4,988 0 0 4,988DOT-D01-RPA11 I-35: 1.6 MI N OF CO RD F22 TO 3.5 MI N OF IA

210 (NB/SB)-- Federal Aid 0 4,489 0 0 4,489


Story - 85 29592 [NBIS: 049180] IM--035()--13-85 1.6 MI Project Total 7,338 6,386 11,463 249 25,436DOT-D01-RPA11 035: SOUTH SKUNK RIVER, 2.6 MI S OFUS 30 (NB

& SB)049180 Federal Aid 6,604 5,747 10,317 0 22,668

Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

34018 NHSX--030()--3H-85 0 MI Project Total 0 0 100 7,068 7,168DOT-D01-RPA11 030: AIRPORT RD INTERCHANGE IN NEVADA -- Federal Aid 0 0 0 5,654 5,654Draft TIP Approved Bridge New,Grading,Right of Way -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

34019 IM--035()--13-85 4.4 MI Project Total 0 0 3,792 0 3,792DOT-D01-RPA11 035: CO RD E41 TO 0.75 MI N OF CO RD E29 (NB) -- Federal Aid 0 0 3,413 0 3,413Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

Warren - 91 25340 [NBIS: 051180] IM--035()--13-91 0 Project Total 400 6,699 0 0 7,099DOT-D05-RPA11 035: CO RD G76 (NEW VIRGINIA) INTERCHANGE 051180 Federal Aid 0 6,029 0 0 6,029Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement,Right of Way,Wetland Mitigation -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

34020 NHSX--092()--3H-91 0 MI Project Total 0 1,620 0 0 1,620DOT-D05-RPA11 092: IA 28 INTERSECTION IN MARTENSDALE -- Federal Aid 0 1,296 0 0 1,296Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

25341 IM--035()--13-91 2.6 MI Project Total 0 12,783 0 0 12,783DOT-D05-RPA11 035: CLANTON CREEK TO N OF IA 92 (SB) -- Federal Aid 0 11,505 0 0 11,505Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Traffic Signs -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --38

TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Total STIP#TAP - Transportation AlternativesJasper - 50 34117 TAP-R-C050()--8T-50 0 Project Total 423 0 0 0 423Jasper CCB On the Chichaqua Valley Trail from just east of Ira to

the Indian Creek Bridge-- Federal Aid 280 0 0 0 280

Draft TIP Approved Ped/Bike Paving -- Regional FA 280 0 0 0 280 --

Warren - 91 23690 STP-E-3680(615)--8V-91 DOT Letting: 10/17/2017 0 Project Total 0 0 442 0 442Indianola Jerry Kelley Trail, from Memorial Park along Iowa Ave,

Kenwood Blvd, and Euclid Ave to N W St-- Federal Aid 0 0 283 0 283

Draft TIP Approved Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- Regional FA 0 0 283 0 283 --PA NOTE: Project tied to STP-E-3680(613)--8V-91 which was deobligated. $26,600 spent on PE the remaining $197,920 was transferred to (615)and rolled to FFY 2018. Total TAP awardof $282,920.

RTP - Recreational Trails ProgramDallas - 25 34115 NRT-C025()--9G-25 0 Project Total 150 0 0 0 150Dallas CCB Raccoon River Valley Trail to High Trestle Trail

Connector Phase 1 Acquisition/Construction (Perry toBouton)

-- Federal Aid120 0 0 0 120

Draft TIP Approved Ped/Bike ROW,Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

25425 NRT-C025(95)--9G-25 Local Letting: 12/21/2021 0 Project Total 290 0 0 0 290Dallas CCB Hiawatha Trail: Raccoon River Valley Trail to High

Trestle Trail Connection-- Federal Aid 139 0 0 0 139

Draft TIP Approved Ped/Bike Miscellaneous -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --PA NOTE: Recieved $139,103 in FFY 2014 Federal Recreational Trail Funds

Jasper - 50 34116 NRT-C050()--9G-50 0 Project Total 6,971 0 0 0 6,971Jasper CCB Mitchellville to Prairie City Rails to Trails Corridor

Acquisition-- Federal Aid 451 0 0 0 451

Draft TIP Approved Ped/Bike ROW -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

DEMO - Federal Demonstration (earmarked) FundsBoone - 08 14334 HDP-C008()--6B-08 0 MI Project Total 1,000 0 0 0 1,000Boone CCB 200th St.: From Des Moines River to Sec. 27-84-27 -- Federal Aid 725 0 0 0 725Draft TIP Approved Bridge Rehabilitation -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

PA NOTE: DEMO ID - IA 170 PRF - Primary Road FundsDallas - 25 25302 [NBIS: 022111] BRFN--141()--39-25 0 MI Project Total 525 0 0 0 525DOT-D04-RPA11 141: NORTH RACCOON RIVER, 1.5 MI WOF IA 144 022111 Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

39

TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Total STIP#Dallas - 25 (continued) 29581 IMN- 080()--0E-25 0 Project Total 0 150 0 0 150DOT-D04-RPA11 080: SOUTH RACCOON RIVER, 1.5 MI EOF US 169 -- Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0Draft TIP Approved Wetland Mitigation -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

34008 [NBIS: 022300] BRFN--080()--39-25 0 MI Project Total 0 0 0 1,100 1,100DOT-D04-RPA11 080: SOUTH RACCOON RIVER, 1.5 MI EOF US 169

(EB)022300 Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0

Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

34009 [NBIS: 022330] BRFN--080()--39-25 0 MI Project Total 0 0 0 1,390 1,390DOT-D04-RPA11 080: NORTH RACCOON RIVER, 2.3 MI EOF US

169 (EB)022330 Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0


Jasper - 50 22009 [NBIS: 030410] BRFN--80()--39-50 0 MI Project Total 330 0 0 0 330DOT-D01-RPA11 I-80: CO RD F48 OVER I-80 030410 Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

25294 [NBIS: 031120] BRFN--080()--39-50 0 MI Project Total 263 0 0 0 263DOT-D01-RPA11 080: E 5TH ST OVER I-80, 1.5 MI E OF IA 14 IN

NEWTON031120 Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0


34011 IMN--080()--0E-50 54.9 MI Project Total 600 600 600 600 2,400DOT-D01-RPA11 080: POLK CO TO IOWA CO -- Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0Draft TIP Approved Patching -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

25349 [NBIS: 030700] BRFN--014()--39-50 0 MI Project Total 0 714 0 0 714DOT-D01-RPA11 014: STREAM, 0.2 MI S OF IA 224 030700 Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

29582 [NBIS: 030710] BRFN--014()--39-50 0 MI Project Total 0 519 0 0 519DOT-D01-RPA11 014: STREAM, 0.2 MI N OF IA 224 030710 Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0Draft TIP Approved Culvert Replacement -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

34012 [NBIS: 030500] BRFN--006()--39-50 0 MI Project Total 0 0 574 0 574DOT-D01-RPA11 006: IOWA INTERSTATE RR, 1.5 MI E OF IA 224 030500 Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

29583 [NBIS: 030555] BRFN--014()--39-50 0 MI Project Total 0 0 200 0 200DOT-D01-RPA11 014: BUCK CREEK, 1.6 MI N OF CO RDF70 030555 Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

29584 [NBIS: 030601] BRFN--014()--39-50 0 MI Project Total 0 0 225 0 225DOT-D01-RPA11 014: CHERRY CREEK, 4.3 MI S OF I-80 030601 Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

40

TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Total STIP#Jasper - 50 (continued) 34013 [NBIS: 031070] BRFN--080()--39-50 0 MI Project Total 0 0 0 400 400DOT-D01-RPA11 080: IOWA INTERSTATE RR, 0.4 MI W OF IA 14

(EB)031070 Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0


Madison - 61 34015 BRFN--169()--39-61 0 MI Project Total 0 0 100 0 100DOT-D04-RPA11 169: NORTH BRANCH NORTH RIVER, 5.2MI S OF

CO RD F90-- Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0

Draft TIP Approved Bridge Rail Retrofit -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

Story - 85 22017 [NBIS: 048990] BRFN--69()--39-85 0 MI Project Total 1,430 0 0 0 1,430DOT-D01-RPA11 US69: KEIGLEY BRANCH, 1.1 MI S OF CORD E18 048990 Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement,Right of Way -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

25355 [NBIS: 048810] BRFN--030()--39-85 0 MI Project Total 367 0 0 0 367DOT-D01-RPA11 030: WEST BRANCH INDIAN CREEK, 0.7MI E OF

CO RD S14 (EB)048810 Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0


25308 [NBIS: 049010] BRFN--210()--39-85 0 MI Project Total 0 480 0 0 480DOT-D01-RPA11 210: I-35 049010 Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

Warren - 91 34021 NHSN--065()--2R-91 1.3 MI Project Total 833 0 0 0 833DOT-D05-RPA11 065: S OF 17TH AVE FROM 3RD AVE ININ

INDIANOLA-- Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0

Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab,Right of Way -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

18579 STPN--92()--2J-91 3 Project Total 350 0 0 0 350DOT-D05-RPA11 IA 92: W OF CO RD R57 TO E OF S N STIN

INDIANOLA (STATE SHARE)-- Federal Aid 0 0 0 0 0

Draft TIP Approved Erosion Control -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

HSIP - Highway Safety Improvement ProgramMadison - 61 34014 HSIP--092()--2H-61 12.2 MI Project Total 2,508 0 0 0 2,508DOT-D04-RPA11 092: WINTERSET TO I-35 -- Federal Aid 2,257 0 0 0 2,257Draft TIP Approved Pavement Widening -- Regional FA 0 0 0 0 0 --

FL - Federal Lands Highway ProgramJasper - 50 29402 PLH-NATLPS()--18-50 0 Project Total 7,500 0 0 0 7,500USFW-D01-RPA11 Neal Smith NWR - Rehab Entrance Rd, bridges, and

parking areas-- Federal Aid 7,500 0 0 0 7,500


41

CHAPTER SIX

Federal Transit Administrations Projects

A portion of Federal fuel tax revenue is placed in the Mass Transit Account of the Federal Highway Trust

Fund. These funds, along with General Fund appropriations, are reserved for transit purposes and are

administered by the FTA.

Program Format

The project listing is organized by TIP funding program. The sponsor name, project number, project

location, project description, project funding, programmed amounts by year, and Transit Number

are shown for each project within the different TIP funding categories. The Transit Number is a

unique number given to each project included in the CIRTPA’s Transit Program.

Project Total refers to the total cost of the project. Federal-Aid refers to the amount of Federal-Aid

(FA) the project has received. State-Aid (SA) refers to the amount of funding the transit provider

has received from the State.

42

Draft 2016 Transit Program(Filtered)

43

RPA-11 (32 Projects)Fund Sponsor Transit #

Expense ClassProject Type

Desc / Add Ons / Addnl Info FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 1573 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 89,000 Capital VSS FA 75,650 Replacement Unit #: 6524 SA




STA, 5310,5311

Region 11 / HIRTA 3038 Administration/Operation/Maintenance Total 3,100,000 Operations FA 986,325 Misc SA 624,981





5317 Region 11 / HIRTA 3566 Rural Mobility Managerment Total 44,948 Operations FA 35,958 Other SA





5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2388 Minivan Total 50,500 Capital VSS FA 42,925 Replacement Unit #: 2227 SA

44
















5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 3242 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220Capital VSS FA 80,937Replacement Unit #: 2228 SA



45






46

CHAPTER SEVEN

Financial Plan

SAFETEA-LU states that the TIP shall include a financial plan that demonstrates how the approved

TIP can be implemented, identification of public and private resources that are reasonably expected

to be made available to carry out the TIP, and recommend any additional financing strategies for

needed projects and programs.

Federal Highway Administration Projects

For purposes of transportation operations and maintenance, the financial plan shall contain

system-level estimates of costs and revenue sources that are reasonably expected to be available to

adequately operate and maintain Federal-aid highways (as defined by 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(5)) and

public transportation (as defined by title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53). In addition, revenue and cost

estimates for the TIP must use an inflation rate(s) to reflect ‘‘year of expenditure dollars,’’ based on

reasonable financial principles and information, developed cooperatively by the CIRTPA, State(s),

and public transportation operator(s). The CIRTPA staff utilized an inflation rate of 4% to

determine ‘‘year of expenditure dollars.’’

The FFY 2016-2019 TIP is fiscally constrained by funding sources. Funding sources include Federal,

State, and local financial resources. The CIRTPA recognizes that in the event of Federal, State, and

local funding changes, amendments, or revisions, it will need to reflect the change in project funds

within the FFY 2016-2019 TIP.

CIRTPA Federal-aid Funding Sources

The total Federal share of projects included in the first year (annual element) of the TIP shall not

exceed levels of funding committed to the CIRTPA. Additionally, the total Federal share of projects

included in the second, third, fourth, and/or subsequent years of the TIP may not exceed levels of

funding committed, or reasonably expected to be available, to the CIRTPA.

Table 7.1 displays a listing of all Federal-Aid funding sources and total project costs in the TIP and

the amount of Federal funds committed by source for FFYs 2016-2019. Table 7.2 and 7.3 display

47

the financial constraint of the STP and TAP funding sources for FFYs 2015-2018, breaking down all

revenues, expenditures, programmed funds, adjustments, and returns.

TABLE 7.1 CIRTPA Federal-Aid Funding Sources

Federal-Aid Funding Sources

2016 2017 2018 2019

Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid

DEMO $1,000,000 $725,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FL $750,000 $750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

HSIP $2,508,000 $2,257,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

NHPP $9,038,000 $7,644,000 $40,746,000 $35,682,000 $22,130,000 $18,644,000 $35,668,000 $30,901,000

PRF $4,698,000 $0 $2,463,000 $0 $1,699,000 $0 $3,490,000 $0

RTP $7,411,000 $710,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

STP $13,849,000 $10,467,000 $15,111,000 $9,677,000 $7,518,000 $4,894,000 $5,660,000 $4,220,000

STP-HBP $14,505,000 $11,604,000 $12,534,000 $10,657,000 $4,815,000 $3,852,000 $3,320,000 $2,641,000

TAP $423,000 $280,000 $0 $0 $442,000 $283,000 $0 $0

Totals $60,932,000 $41,187,000 $70,854,000 $56,016,000 $36,604,000 $27,673,000 $48,138,000 $37,762,000

TABLE 7.2 CIRTPA Surface Transportation Program Financial Constraint

2016 2017 2018 2019

Unobligated Balance (Carryover) $13,851,955 $8,447,075 $3,832,579 $4,000,179

STP Target $4,850,000 $4,850,000 $4,850,000 $4,850,000

TAP Flex Funds $212,000 $212,000 $212,000 $212,000

Subtotal $18,913,955 $13,509,075 $8,894,579 $9,062,179

Transfer Out $0 $0 $0 $0

Programmed STP Funds $10,466,880 $9,676,496 $4,894,400 $4,220,000

Balance $8,447,075 $3,382,579 $4,000,179 $4,842,179 Based on Iowa Department of Transportation’s Fiscal Year 2015 3rd Quarter Status Report.

TABLE 7.3 CIRTPA Transportation Alternatives Program Financial Constraint

2016 2017 2018 2019

Unobligated Balance (Carryover) $833,298 $831,298 $1,109,298 $1,104,378

TAP Target $278,000 $278,000 $278,000 $278,000

Subtotal $1,111,298 $1,109,298 $1,387,298 $1,387,378

Transfer Out $0 $0 $0 $0

Programmed TAP Funds $280,000 $0 $282,920 $0

Balance $831,298 $1,109,298 $1,104,378 $1,382,378 Based on Iowa Department of Transportation’s Fiscal Year 2015 3rd Quarter Status Report.

48

Operations and Maintenance Costs and Projections

The following tables demonstrate the costs of operations and maintenance to the Federal-aid System.

Table 7.4 contains the operation and maintenance costs on Federal-aid city streets within each city in

the CIRTPA. Tables 7.5 and 7.6 contain the projected operation and maintenance costs on Federal-aid

city streets within each city in the CIRTPA based on data in Table 7.4.

TABLE 7.4 2014 CIRTPA City Street Operations and Maintenance Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes

City/County Name

On-System Miles

Total Miles Percentage Federal-Aid

Routes

Total Roadway

Maintenance

Total Operations

Operations on Federal-Aid Routes

Maintenance on Federal-Aid Routes

Boone County 2.245 45.65 0.05 $339,003 $93,791 $14,367 $8,503

Boone 27.382 97.719 0.28 $919,881 $712,459 $199,631 $257,751

Dallas County 11.398 73.782 0.15 $684,097 $218,900 $31,230 $106,466

Adel 2.589 22.204 0.12 $230,450 $79,929 $9,320 $26,870

Perry 11.496 44.355 0.26 $591,254 $271,186 $70,291 $153,253

Jasper County 6.433 74.492 0.09 $751,184 $349,978 $33,812 $73,468

Newton 24.507 89.574 0.27 $959,326 $396,728 $108,545 $262,741

Madison County 3.824 29.914 0.13 $21,591 $50,322 $7,511 $38,328

Winterset 4.042 36.293 0.11 $632,872 $26,041 $2,901 $70,502

Marion County 7.078 40.214 0.18 $273,097 $114,017 $28,818 $54,168

Knoxville 11.272 42.471 0.27 $451,257 $171,764 $45,586 $119,764

Pella 15.529 60.669 0.26 $819,908 $126,287 $32,329 $209,896

Polk County 2.322 10.141 0.23 $168,991 $16,241 $3,729 $26,006

Story County 9.099 78.344 0.12 $988,279 $463,695 $60,218 $154,794

Nevada 14.967 44.428 0.34 $650,506 $338,191 $113,936 $219,155

Story City 3.164 22.365 0.14 $286,881 $147,747 $20,906 $40,594

Warren County 2.538 27.019 0.09 $187,500 $80,744 $10,244 $15,332

Indianola 15.372 69.169 0.22 $1,108,880 $224,643 $49,916 $246,393

Totals 175.257 908.803 0.19 $10,064,957 $3,882,663 $843,290 $2,083,984

Source: 2014 City Street Finance Reports

49

TABLE 7.5 CIRTPA Forecasted City Street Maintenance Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes

City/County Name 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Boone County $8,503 $8,843 $9,197 $9,565 $9,947 $10,345

Boone $257,751 $268,061 $278,783 $289,935 $301,532 $313,594

Dallas County $106,466 $110,725 $115,154 $119,760 $124,550 $129,532

Adel $26,870 $27,945 $29,063 $30,225 $31,434 $32,691

Perry $153,253 $159,383 $165,758 $172,389 $179,284 $186,456

Jasper County $73,468 $76,407 $79,463 $82,642 $85,947 $89,385

Newton $262,741 $273,251 $284,181 $295,548 $307,370 $319,665

Madison County $38,328 $39,861 $41,456 $43,114 $44,838 $46,632

Winterset $70,502 $73,322 $76,255 $79,305 $82,477 $85,776

Marion County $54,168 $56,335 $58,588 $60,932 $63,369 $65,904

Knoxville $119,764 $124,555 $129,537 $134,718 $140,107 $145,711

Pella $209,896 $218,292 $227,024 $236,104 $245,549 $255,371

Polk County $26,006 $27,046 $28,128 $29,253 $30,423 $31,640

Story County $154,794 $160,986 $167,425 $174,122 $181,087 $188,331

Nevada $219,155 $227,921 $237,038 $246,520 $256,380 $266,636

Story City $40,594 $42,218 $43,906 $45,663 $47,489 $49,389

Warren County $15,332 $15,945 $16,583 $17,246 $17,936 $18,654

Indianola $246,393 $256,249 $266,499 $277,159 $288,245 $299,775

Totals $2,083,984 $2,167,343 $2,254,037 $2,344,199 $2,437,967 $2,535,485


50

TABLE 7.6 CIRTPA Forecasted City Street Operation Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes

City/County Name 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Boone County $14,367 $14,942 $15,295 $15,663 $16,290 $16,941

Boone $199,631 $207,616 $218,339 $229,490 $241,087 $250,731

Dallas County $31,230 $32,479 $36,908 $41,514 $46,305 $48,157

Adel $9,320 $9,693 $10,811 $11,973 $13,182 $13,709

Perry $70,291 $73,103 $79,478 $86,108 $93,004 $96,724

Jasper County $33,812 $35,164 $38,221 $41,399 $44,705 $46,493

Newton $108,545 $112,887 $123,817 $135,184 $147,006 $152,886

Madison County $7,511 $7,811 $9,406 $11,064 $12,789 $13,300

Winterset $2,901 $3,017 $5,950 $9,000 $12,172 $12,659

Marion County $28,818 $29,971 $32,224 $34,568 $37,005 $38,485

Knoxville $45,586 $47,409 $52,392 $57,573 $62,962 $65,480

Pella $32,329 $33,622 $42,354 $51,435 $60,879 $63,314

Polk County $3,729 $3,878 $4,960 $6,085 $7,255 $7,545

Story County $60,218 $62,627 $69,066 $75,763 $82,728 $86,037

Nevada $113,936 $118,493 $127,610 $137,092 $146,953 $152,831

Story City $20,906 $21,742 $23,431 $25,187 $27,014 $28,094

Warren County $10,244 $10,654 $11,292 $11,955 $12,645 $13,151

Indianola $49,916 $51,913 $62,163 $72,823 $83,909 $87,265

Totals $843,290 $877,022 $963,715 $1,053,877 $1,147,645 $1,193,551


Table 7.7 contains the operation and maintenance costs on Federal-aid county roads within each county

in the CIRTPA. Tables 7.8 and 7.9 contain the projected operation and maintenance costs on Federal-aid

county roads within each county in the CIRTPA based on data in Table 7.7.

51

TABLE 7.7 2013 CIRTPA County Road Operations and Maintenance Costs on Federal-Aid Routes

County Name On-System

Miles Total Miles

Percentage Federal-Aid

Routes

Total Operations

Cost

Total Maintenance

Cost

Operations Cost on

Federal-Aid Routes

Maintenance Cost on

Federal-Aid Routes

Boone County 300.771 970.508 0.31 $3,212,631 $2,041,434 $632,663 $995,629

Dallas County 285.914 860.585 0.33 $5,256,323 $2,530,368 $840,670 $1,746,319

Jasper County 410.672 1,228.532 0.33 $3,500,700 $2,299,755 $768,759 $1,170,209

Madison County 332.373 904.918 0.37 $2,749,402 $1,561,537 $573,547 $1,009,845

Marion County 314.805 853.313 0.37 $3,456,055 $1,833,412 $676,384 $1,275,011

Polk County 329.165 726.570 0.45 $4,775,449 $2,619,613 $1,186,788 $2,163,468

Story County 368.729 936.236 0.39 $3,502,159 $1,978,356 $779,160 $1,379,297

Warren County 321.132 863.363 0.37 $3,386,168 $2,072,499 $770,876 $1,259,501

Totals 2,663.561 7,344.025 0.37 $29,838,887 $16,936,974 $6,228,847 $10,999,279

Source: 2014 County Engineers Annual Report

TABLE 7.8 CIRTPA Forecasted County Road Operations Costs on Federal-Aid Routes

County Name 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Boone County $632,663 $657,969 $684,288 $711,659 $740,126 $769,731

Dallas County $840,670 $874,296 $909,268 $945,639 $983,465 $1,022,803

Jasper County $768,759 $799,509 $831,489 $864,749 $899,339 $935,312

Madison County $573,547 $596,488 $620,348 $645,162 $670,968 $697,807

Marion County $676,384 $703,439 $731,576 $760,840 $791,273 $822,924

Polk County $1,186,788 $1,234,259 $1,283,629 $1,334,975 $1,388,374 $1,443,909

Story County $779,160 $810,326 $842,739 $876,449 $911,507 $947,967

Warren County $770,876 $801,711 $833,779 $867,130 $901,815 $937,888

Totals $6,228,847 $6,478,000 $6,737,120 $7,006,605 $7,286,869 $7,578,344


52

TABLE 7.9 CIRTPA Forecasted County Road Maintenance Costs on Federal-Aid Routes

County Name 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Boone County $995,629 $1,035,454 $1,076,872 $1,119,947 $1,164,745 $1,211,334

Dallas County $1,746,319 $1,816,171 $1,888,818 $1,964,371 $2,042,946 $2,124,664

Jasper County $1,170,209 $1,217,017 $1,265,698 $1,316,325 $1,368,979 $1,423,738

Madison County $1,009,845 $1,050,238 $1,092,248 $1,135,938 $1,181,375 $1,228,630

Marion County $1,275,011 $1,326,011 $1,379,051 $1,434,213 $1,491,582 $1,551,245

Polk County $2,163,468 $2,250,006 $2,340,006 $2,433,607 $2,530,951 $2,632,189

Story County $1,379,297 $1,434,468 $1,491,847 $1,551,521 $1,613,582 $1,678,125

Warren County $1,259,501 $1,309,881 $1,362,276 $1,416,767 $1,473,438 $1,532,375

Totals $10,999,279 $11,439,250 $11,896,820 $12,372,692 $12,867,600 $13,382,304


Non-Federal-aid Revenue Sources and Projections

In addition to operations and maintenance costs are non Federal-aid revenue sources. Non Federal-

aid revenue sources and projections are included to demonstrate the revenue sources and amounts

available for operation and maintenance of the system in the CIRTPA planning area.

Table 7.10 contains the receipts for the Road Use Tax Fund and other road monies on Federal-aid

routes within each city in the CIRTPA. Table 7.11 contains the projected revenues on Federal-aid

routes within each city in the CIRTPA based on data in Table 7.10.

Table 7.12 contains the receipts for Farm-to-Market Federal-aid routes within each county in the

CIRTPA. Table 7.13 contains the projected revenues for Farm-to-Market Federal-aid routes within

each county in the CIRTPA based on data in Table 7.12.

Table 7.14 contains the receipts for the Secondary Road Fund Federal-aid routes within each

county in the CIRTPA. Table 7.15 contains the projected revenues for the Secondary Road Fund

Federal-aid routes within each county in the CIRTPA based on data in Table 7.14.

53

TABLE 7.10 2013 CIRTPA City Street Fund Receipts

City/County Name Road Use Tax

Fund Federal-Aid

Receipts Miscellaneous

Receipts Total Receipts

Boone County $505,802 $130,553 $345,505 $1,001,860

Boone $1,264,248 $707,794 $392,682 $2,364,724

Dallas County $811,145 $384,992 $759,722 $1,955,909

Adel $368,077 $16,159 $592,170 $976,406

Perry $769,074 $89,467 $1,513,702 $2,372,243

Jasper County $905,383 $207,214 $40,816 $1,153,413

Newton $1,523,169 $2,877 $0 $1,526,046

Madison County $269,933 $142,606 $83,182 $495,721

Winterset $518,241 $118,190 $808,103 $1,444,534

Marion County $372,054 $59,414 $987,538 $1,161,175

Knoxville $730,230 $769,701 $214,388 $1,714,319

Pella $1,033,686 $962,831 $0 $1,996,517

Polk County $129,904 $91,874 $44,494 $266,272

Story County $1,122,990 $453,727 $406,734 $1,983,451

Nevada $679,597 $69,005 $4,420,023 $5,168,625

Story City $342,598 $420,111 $287,512 $1,050,221

Warren County $311,942 $159,525 $10,140 $481,607

Indianola $1,476,038 $15,162 $1,038,833 $2,530,033

Totals $13,134,111 $4,801,202 $11,945,544 $29,643,076


TABLE 7.11 CIRTPA Forecasted City Street Fund Revenue

City/County Name 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Boone County $1,001,860 $1,041,934 $1,083,612 $1,126,956 $1,172,034 $1,218,916

Boone $2,364,724 $2,459,313 $2,557,685 $2,659,993 $2,766,393 $2,877,048

Dallas County $1,955,909 $2,034,145 $2,115,511 $2,200,132 $2,288,137 $2,379,662

Adel $976,406 $1,015,462 $1,056,081 $1,098,324 $1,142,257 $1,187,947

Perry $2,372,243 $2,467,133 $2,565,818 $2,668,451 $2,775,189 $2,886,196

Jasper County $1,153,413 $1,199,550 $1,247,532 $1,297,433 $1,349,330 $1,403,303

Newton $1,526,046 $1,587,088 $1,650,571 $1,716,594 $1,785,258 $1,856,668

Madison County $495,721 $515,550 $536,172 $557,619 $579,923 $603,120

Winterset $1,444,534 $1,502,315 $1,562,408 $1,624,904 $1,689,900 $1,757,496

Marion County $1,161,175 $1,207,622 $1,255,927 $1,306,164 $1,358,411 $1,412,747

Knoxville $1,714,319 $1,782,892 $1,854,207 $1,928,376 $2,005,511 $2,085,731

Pella $1,996,517 $2,076,378 $2,159,433 $2,245,810 $2,335,643 $2,429,068

Polk County $266,272 $276,923 $288,000 $299,520 $311,501 $323,961

Story County $1,983,451 $2,062,789 $2,145,301 $2,231,113 $2,320,357 $2,413,171

54

City/County Name 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Nevada $5,168,625 $5,375,370 $5,590,385 $5,814,000 $6,046,560 $6,288,423

Story City $1,050,221 $1,092,230 $1,135,919 $1,181,356 $1,228,610 $1,277,754

Warren County $481,607 $500,871 $520,906 $541,742 $563,412 $585,949

Indianola $2,530,033 $2,631,234 $2,736,484 $2,845,943 $2,959,781 $3,078,172

Totals $29,643,076 $30,828,799 $32,061,951 $33,344,429 $34,678,206 $36,065,334


TABLE 7.12 State Fiscal Year 2014 CIRTPA Farm-to-Market Receipts

County Name 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total

Boone County $204,095 $261,806 $268,942 $157,157 $892,000

Dallas County $219,271 $281,274 $288,940 $168,843 $958,328

Jasper County $274,114 $351,625 $361,209 $211,073 $1,198,021

Madison County $192,569 $247,020 $253,753 $148,281 $841,624

Marion County $230,720 $295,960 $304,027 $177,659 $1,008,366

Polk County $364,819 $467,977 $480,732 $280,917 $1,594,444

Story County $228,260 $292,805 $300,786 $175,765 $997,616

Warren County $247,671 $317,704 $326,364 $190,711 $1,082,451

Totals $1,961,519 $2,516,171 $2,584,752 $1,510,406 $8,572,848

Source: Iowa Department of Transportation

TABLE 7.13 CIRTPA Forecasted Farm-to-Market Revenue

County Name 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Boone County $892,000 $927,680 $964,787 $1,003,379 $1,043,514 $1,085,254

Dallas County $958,328 $996,661 $1,036,528 $1,077,989 $1,121,108 $1,165,953

Jasper County $1,198,021 $1,245,942 $1,295,780 $1,347,611 $1,401,515 $1,457,576

Madison County $841,624 $875,289 $910,301 $946,713 $984,581 $1,023,964

Marion County $1,008,366 $1,048,701 $1,090,649 $1,134,275 $1,179,646 $1,226,831

Polk County $1,594,444 $1,658,222 $1,724,551 $1,793,533 $1,865,274 $1,939,885

Story County $997,616 $1,037,521 $1,079,021 $1,122,182 $1,167,070 $1,213,752

Warren County $1,082,451 $1,125,749 $1,170,779 $1,217,610 $1,266,315 $1,316,967

Totals $8,572,848 $8,915,762 $9,272,392 $9,643,288 $10,029,020 $10,430,180


55

TABLE 7.14 Fiscal Year 2014 CIRTPA Secondary Road Fund Receipts

County Name Property

Tax L.O.S.T.

Road Use Tax Fund

Farm-to- Market

Extension Revenue

Time-21 RISE Bridge Funds

Misc Receipts

Total Receipts

Boone County $2,160,012 $59,858 $2,821,773 $21,114 $330,146

$199,527 - $146,185 $5,738,615

Dallas County $3,597,406

- $2,972,100 $28,648 $348,294

- - $193,883 $7,140,331

Jasper County $1,947,341

- $3,847,596 $27,557 $449,148

- $159,094 $369,993 $6,800,729

Madison County $1,557,236

- $2,706,272 $31,333 $318,254

- - $183,636 $4,796,731

Marion County $1,916,338

- $3,058,767 $17,785 $357,249

- - $160,159 $5,510,298

Polk County $6,830,476

- $4,646,002 $58,448 $547,094

- $599,216 $76,552 $12,757,788

Story County $2,307,000

- $3,049,140 $27,719 $357,251

- - $862,668 $6,603,778

Warren County $2,470,278

- $3,277,588 - $380,804

$184,218 $498,480 $341,728 $7,153,096

Totals $22,786,087 $59,858 $26,379,238 $212,604 $3,088,240 $383,745 $1,256,790 $2,334,804 $56,501,366


TABLE 7.15 CIRTPA Forecasted Secondary Road Fund Revenue

County Name 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Boone County $5,559,289 $5,781,661 $6,012,927 $6,253,444 $6,503,582 $6,763,725

Dallas County $7,515,684 $7,816,311 $8,128,964 $8,454,122 $8,792,287 $9,143,979

Jasper County $7,525,890 $7,826,926 $8,140,003 $8,465,603 $8,804,227 $9,156,396

Madison County $5,240,446 $5,450,064 $5,668,066 $5,894,789 $6,130,581 $6,375,804

Marion County $5,950,528 $6,188,549 $6,436,091 $6,693,535 $6,961,276 $7,239,727

Polk County $13,619,682 $14,164,469 $14,731,048 $15,320,290 $15,933,102 $16,570,426

Story County $6,091,435 $6,335,092 $6,588,496 $6,852,036 $7,126,117 $7,411,162

Warren County $7,125,242 $7,410,252 $7,706,662 $8,014,928 $8,335,525 $8,668,946

Totals $58,628,196 $60,973,324 $63,412,257 $65,948,747 $68,586,697 $71,330,165


56

Federal Transit Administration Projects

As with highway projects, legislation requires that all Federal and State transit projects be included

in a fiscally constrained TIP. As the 5307 annual apportionment is the only guaranteed source of

grant funds, CIRTPA actively seeks discretionary funding from a variety of sources, including the

state Public Transit Equipment and Facilities Management System (PTMS) process and earmarks

(State and Federal). Because these funds are the hardest to obtain, there is always uncertainty

whether the projects will be implemented in the current year. Therefore, the TIP will periodically

be revised if project funding is reduced or delayed. Table 7.17 lists all federal funding sources for

HIRTA projects by FFY 2019. Table 7.18 lists all state funding sources for HIRTA projects by FFY

2019.

Funding Sources

Federal and State funding account for the majority of all capital purchases and as a result, is critical

to success. The following section outlines the general funding sources available to HIRTA for FFY

2016-2019.

TABLE 7.16 HIRTA’s Federal Funding Sources for FY 2016 - 2019

Federal-Aid Funding Sources

2016 2017 2018 2019

Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid

5311 $3,100,000 $986,325 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

5339 $702,000 $596,700 $783,944 $666,360 $789,000 $669,000 $460,660 $397,561

5317 $44,948 $35,958 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Totals $43,846,948 $1,618,983 $783,944 $666,360 $789,000 $669,000 $460,660 $397,561

TABLE 7.17 HIRTA’s State Funding Sources for FY 2016 - 2019

State-Aid Funding Sources

2016 2017 2018 2019

Total Cost State Aid Total Cost State Aid Total Cost State Aid Total Cost State Aid

STA $0 $624,981 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Totals $0 $624,981 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

57

C H A P T E R E I G H T Public Participation

The CIRTPA’s Public Participation Plan outlines the CIRTPA’s public outreach requirements and efforts

through three primary components: public meetings, publications, and maintenance of the CIRTPA’s

website, www.cirtpa.org.

The CIRTPA holds a standard of a minimum public comment period of 45 calendar days and a minimum

4-week advance public notice before an initial, amended, or revised TIP is adopted by the CIRTPA. This

standard also applies when holding public meetings for any TIP amendments. The CIRTPA will approve

the TIP, and/or amendments to the TIP, following the completion of the public comment period. The

CIRTPA works to hold public meetings at convenient and accessible locations and times. If a person is

not able to attend a public meeting, information regarding the TIP and/or amendments to the TIP is

available on the CIRTPA’s website. In addition, all meetings of the CIRTPA committees are open to the

public. Members of the public may request time on the CIRTPA’s agendas to comment on specific

subjects of interest to the representatives.

Legal notices and meeting announcements regarding the adoption of the TIP and/or amendments to the

TIP are published in The Des Moines Register and sent to the various news agencies within central Iowa

a week before the scheduled public meeting.

The CIRTPA website contains CIRTPA news and information about upcoming events, CIRTPA members,

staff, the organization of the CIRTPA, and employment opportunities. Meeting agendas and minutes are

available, as is a listing of committee representatives. The website features a library containing

documents, maps, newsletters, and press releases. Additionally, educational opportunities related to

CIRTPA activities are listed on the website. CIRTPA staff regularly updates the website in order to engage

citizens.

The CIRTPA accepts input and comments from the public through a variety of means. Members of the

public may express their views, share their opinions, and ask questions regarding proposed amendments

in three ways: 1) orally at a meeting; 2) in writing via forms available at a meeting; or, 3) by submitting

58

written comments to the CIRTPA prior to the close of the given comment period. The CIRTPA will make a

summary, analysis, or report on the disposition of comments made as part of the review of the TIP

and/or amendments to the TIP and will notify the CIRTPA TTC and TPC representatives of all TIP

comments as part of the approved TIP. Immediately following is a summary of the comments made June

24, 2015 and any subsequent written comments submitted to the CIRTPA before July 16, 2015.

Public Comment Summary

The CIRTPA staff held a public meeting on June 23, 2015, to receive comments and questions on the TIP

draft. The participants were given a copy of the TIP (also, available on the CIRTPA website) and staff

guided the participants through the document, chapter by chapter, explaining in detail each chapter’s

significance within the TIP. Once staff finished explaining the information in the TIP, the meeting was

open for discussion. The participants did not have any comments about the TIP draft or any particular

surface transportation improvements listed.

59

Appendix A Federal regulations require documentation in addition to the project list prior to approval of the

Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance’s Federal Fiscal Years 2016-2019

Transportation Improvement Program. All regional planning affiliation transportation improvement

programs must be accompanied by:

1. A resolution of adoption by the planning organization.

This resolution can be found on the following page.

60

RESOLUTION PLACEHOLDER

61

Appendix B

62

Appendix C

64

8

TAP Scoring Matrix

Criteria No.

Evaluation Criteria Points

1 Multipurpose aspects 15

2 Financial plan 15

3 Quality/significance of the site 15

4 Regional need for the project, public demand, etc. 15

5 Local support 10

6 Relationship to other regional plans/projects (MPO Trail Gaps, CONNECT, The Tomorrow Plan, etc.)

10

7 Urgency of the implementation of the project 10

8 Status of the facility right-of-way 5

9 Impact to regional economic development and tourism 5

Total Points 100

65