february 5, 2009

18
4 2 5 1 0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011 February 5, 2009 “Trust yourself. You know more than you think you do.” -Benjamin Spock

Upload: bruce-bean

Post on 31-Dec-2015

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

February 5, 2009. “Trust yourself. You know more than you think you do.” -Benjamin Spock. February 5, 2009. Buy Class Notes in bookstore Exam 1: Thursday, 2/12 *50 minutes* - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: February 5, 2009

42510011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

February 5, 2009

“Trust yourself.

You know more than you think you do.”

-Benjamin Spock

Page 2: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

February 5, 2009• Buy Class Notes in bookstore • Exam 1: Thursday, 2/12 *50 minutes*

Covers 1.2 – 1.4, 1.7, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2 in text, explorations 1.1, 1.4, 1.7, 2.7, 2.9, 3.1, 3.6 and notes/problems from class.

• Sample questions online (answers will be posted)• Drop deadline: Tuesday, 2/10• Section 3.2 covered today

Page 3: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

Ways to represent subtraction (“pictorial models”):

1. Take away

2. Comparison

3.2 – Subtraction

Page 4: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

3. Number line model

Ex: 7 – 9 = -2

Why is it important to start at 0?

3.2 (cont’d)

-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Page 5: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

3.2 (cont’d)Vocabulary: for A – B = C

• A is called the Minuend• B is called the Subtrahend• C is called the Difference

Do the commutative and associative properties from addition apply here, too?

Page 6: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

3.2 (cont’d)Examples:

Is A – B = B – A?

Is 6 – 4 = 4 – 6?

What is true of 6 – 4 and 4 – 6?

One of the worst things we can do is lie to kids: “You can’t take a bigger number away from a smaller number.” Or “You have to put the bigger number first (in the minuend).”

Page 7: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

3.2 (cont’d)

(NO, subtraction is neither commutative nor associative.)

Page 8: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

3.2 (cont’d)It’s important that students see connections between

computations like these:

Ex: If 9 – 4 = 5, then

9 – 5 = 4

and 4 + 5 = 9

and 5 + 4 = 9

You try: If 74 – 61 = 13, then…

Page 9: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

3.2 (cont’d)

Mental Subtraction (Less obvious than mental addition)

Ex: 65 – 28

• Break subtrahend apart: (65 – 20) – 8 • Adding up: 28 + 30 = 58 and 58 + 7 = 6

then 30 + 7 = 37 is the total difference• Compensation: (65 + 2) – (28 + 2)• Compatible numbers: (65 – 25) – 3

Page 10: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

3.2 (cont’d)

As with mental addition, the name of the strategy is not important.

Ex: (you try, and write down an explanation of how you did these):

1. 91 – 82

2. 97 – 39

3. 201 – 293

Page 11: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

3.2 (cont’d)

Another strategy for subtraction: Regrouping

Ex: Use base 10 blocks to demonstrate the subtraction problem

302 – 84

Page 12: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

3.2 (cont’d)

302 – 84:

Start with:

Page 13: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

3.2 (cont’d)

302 – 84:

Now, look at the part you are taking away (shown here in black). We need to regroup one flat into 10 longs, and one of those longs into 10 units to remove 84 from 302. The result? 218

Page 14: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

3.2 (cont’d)

Ex: What did the student do wrong?

457 – 29 = 338

(Explain the error in a sentence.)

Page 15: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

3.2 (cont’d)

Ex: What did the student do wrong?

457 – 29 = 338

(Explain the error in a sentence.)

An incomplete answer: “The student was supposed to cross out the 5 and make it a 4.”

(This does not explain mathematically why it is wrong. It only says which rule was broken in the standard algorithm.)

Page 16: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

3.2 (cont’d)

457 – 29 = 338

An better answer: “In the minuend, we need to exchange a ten for some ones. So, 5 tens and 7 ones is the same as 4 tens and 17 ones. This student did not trade the ten away, and so thinks that 5 tens and 7 ones is the same as 5 tens and 17 ones.”

Page 17: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

3.2 (cont’d)As you consider student errors like this, ask yourself…• Was the student applying correct “rules”

incorrectly?• Would the student have made this mistake if he/she

was using base 10 blocks?• If the student thought of each number as more than

a collection of digits (e.g. 56 is 5 tens and 6 ones), would this mistake be made?

• In my answer, does my explanation focus on rules or on the mathematical reason why this error does not produce the correct answer?

Page 18: February 5, 2009

4251

0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011

HomeworkDue Tuesday, 2/10:

Link to Online Homework List