fe analysis tailoring structural dynamic behavior through...

1
Fine density/design variable mesh Computational Science and Engineering 2013 Annual Meeting Tailoring Structural Dynamic Behavior through Topology Optimization with Multiresolution Polygons Evgueni T. Filipov, Junho Chun, Glaucio H. Paulino, and Junho Song University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Email: [email protected] Website: www.ghpaulino.com Motivation Conclusions Topology optimization can be used for advanced structural eigenfrequency or forced vibration problems Polygonal elements allow for optimization of complex domains and improved solutions Multiresolution approach provides a higher resolution of the topology for a lower computational cost National Science Foundation Coarse displacement mesh Acknowledgements Polygonal multiresolution framework =1 = =1 =0 Maximize ω 1 Suspended mass M S Cantilever with a suspended mass Arch with band-gap maximization ω 3 - ω 2 = 83.7Hz 319.2Hz Increasing suspended mass =1 =0.01 Fine design variable mesh Fine density variable mesh Comparison of forced vibration results 1. Conventional coarse mesh 3. Conventional fine mesh 2. Multiresolution mesh Computational time for the three meshes Topology optimization can be used to tailor cost effective structures or microstructures with specialized dynamic characteristics Eigenfrequency optimization Forced vibrations Minimize dynamic compliance: Maximize lowest eigenfrequency: max ρ λ min =1,… ω 2 ρ = ρ ≤ Ω s.t. ρ = ρ ≤ Ω s.t. min ρ Φ(ρ) = ω ω ω + − 2 = 0 50 100 150 0 200 400 600 Iteration Eigenfrequency ( ) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 50 100 150 200 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Iteration Eigenfrequency ( ) 4 3 2 1 ω 1 =205 Hz ω 1 =68 Hz Time (seconds) 1 2 3 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 FE Analysis Optimization Initialization FE Analysis Optimization Initialization Buildings designed to minimize seismic or wind vibrations, e.g. tune mass damper of Taipei 101 (Figure on right) Aircraft wings created to avoid resonance from turbulence Frequency passband and stopband filters for use in audio equipment Potential applications Superposed meshes Polygonal elements can: Model irregular domains Avoid instabilities in optimization Provide mesh independent solutions Nonconforming sub-discretization ω 2 = 119.7Hz ω 3 = 203.4Hz

Upload: others

Post on 10-Aug-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FE Analysis Tailoring Structural Dynamic Behavior through ...paulino.ce.gatech.edu/posters_page/13filipov... · 2013 Annual Meeting Tailoring Structural Dynamic Behavior through Topology

•Fine density/design variable

mesh

Computational Science and Engineering

2013 Annual Meeting

Tailoring Structural Dynamic Behavior through

Topology Optimization with Multiresolution Polygons Evgueni T. Filipov, Junho Chun, Glaucio H. Paulino, and Junho Song

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Email: [email protected] Website: www.ghpaulino.com

Motivation

Conclusions

• Topology optimization can be used for advanced structural

eigenfrequency or forced vibration problems

• Polygonal elements allow for optimization of complex

domains and improved solutions

• Multiresolution approach provides a higher resolution of the

topology for a lower computational cost

• National Science Foundation

Coarse

displacement

mesh

Acknowledgements

Polygonal multiresolution framework

𝑀𝑆

𝐴𝑖𝜌𝑖𝑁𝑛𝑖=1

=∞

𝑀𝑆

𝐴𝑖𝜌𝑖𝑁𝑛𝑖=1

=0

Maximize ω1

Suspended

mass MS

Cantilever with a suspended mass

Arch with band-gap maximization

ω3 - ω2 = 83.7Hz 319.2Hz

Incr

easi

ng

su

spen

ded

mas

s

𝑀𝑆

𝐴𝑖𝜌𝑖𝑁𝑛𝑖=1

=0.01

Fine design

variable mesh

Fine density

variable mesh

Comparison of forced vibration results 1. Conventional coarse mesh

3. Conventional fine mesh

2. Multiresolution mesh

Computational time

for the three meshes

• Topology optimization can be used

to tailor cost effective structures or

microstructures with specialized

dynamic characteristics

Eigenfrequency optimization

Forced vibrations

Minimize dynamic

compliance:

Maximize lowest

eigenfrequency:

maxρ λ𝑚𝑖𝑛 min

𝑗=1,…𝐽 ω𝑗

2

𝑉 ρ = ρ𝑑𝑉 ≤ 𝑉𝑠Ω

s.t.

𝑉 ρ = ρ𝑑𝑉 ≤ 𝑉𝑠Ω

s.t.

minρΦ(ρ) = 𝐅𝑇𝐔 𝑑ω

ω𝑒

ω𝑠

𝐊 + 𝑖𝜔𝐂 − 𝜔2𝐌 𝐔 = 𝐅

0 50 100 1500

200

400

600

Iteration

Eig

enfr

equ

ency

(

)

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 50 100 150 20050

100

150

200

250

300

350

Iteration

Eig

en

freq

uen

cy

(

)

4

3

2

1

ω1=205 Hz

ω1=68 Hz

Tim

e (

seco

nd

s)

1 2 30

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

FE Analysis

Optimization

InitializationT

ime (

seco

nd

s)

1 2 30

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

FE Analysis

Optimization

Initialization

Tim

e (

seco

nd

s)

1 2 30

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

FE Analysis

Optimization

Initialization

Buildings designed to minimize

seismic or wind vibrations, e.g.

tune mass damper of Taipei 101

(Figure on right)

Aircraft wings created to avoid

resonance from turbulence

Frequency passband and stopband

filters for use in audio equipment

Potential applications

Superposed

meshes

Polygonal elements can:

• Model irregular domains

• Avoid instabilities in optimization

• Provide mesh independent

solutions

Nonconforming

sub-discretization

ω2 = 119.7Hz ω3 = 203.4Hz