fdd_ssv

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fddssv 1/25

Site name ETF827

Approved Date 28.05.2013

/ 2013

STC LTE FDD 4G1 Project

STC LTE-TD Radio Network Acceptance

Cluster/Site Initial Tuning Report

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

Cluster /Site Name ETF827

Drive test date 28.05.2013

Test interactionTest Type Scanner / Scanner + UE

Analyzed by

Date of report submission

© STC 2012 All rights reserved. The information in this document is the property of STC.

Except as specifically authorized in writing by STC, the receiver of this document

shall keep the information contained here confidential and shall protect the

same in whole or in part from disclosure and dissemination to third parties.

Disclosure and disseminations to the receiver's employees shall only be made

on a strict need to know basis. The information in this document is subject to

change without notice and STC assumes no responsibility for factual in

accuracies or typographical errors.

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

1 CLUSTER OVERVIEW...............................................................................................4

2 SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS.........................................................................................5

3 TEST METHODOLOGIES..........................................................................................5

4 REFERENCE SIGNAL................................................................................................54.1 BEST SERVER...................................................................................................54.1.1 Best serve Plots............................................................................................64.2 RSRP CLUSTER RESULTS.................................................................................74.2.1 RSRP Plots prior and after initial tuning activities.........................................64.3 RSRQ CLUSTER RESULTS.................................................................................84.3.1 RSRQ Plots Prior and After initial tuning activities........................................84.3.2 RSRQ Statistics.............................................................................................94.3.3 RSRP and RSRQ Statistics..........................................................................104.4 SINR CLUSTER RESULTS..................................................................................11

4.4.1 SINR Plots....................................................................................................114.4.2 SINR Statistics.............................................................................................12

5 THROUGHPUT ANALYSES......................................................................................135.1 ACTUAL DL THROUGHPUT FROM UE.................................................................135.2 DL THROUGHPUT PLOT.....................................................................................145.2.1 DL Throughput vs. SINR Statistics..............................................................155.3 ACTUAL UL THROUGHPUT FROM UE.................................................................165.4 UL THROUGHPUT PLOT.....................................................................................175.4.1 UL Throughput vs. SINR Statistics..............................................................185.4.2 End to End Latency Statistics RTT (Round Trip Time)................................19

6 TROUBLE SPOTS AND AREAS..............................................................................19

7 CHANGE REQUESTS..............................................................................................197.1 PHYSICAL CHANGE REQUESTS........................................................................207.2 P ARAMETER CHANGE REQUESTS....................................................................207.3 DRIVE TEST DIARY..........................................................................................217.4 ALARM DETAILS..............................................................................................21

8 APPENDIXES...........................................................................................................219 DISTRIBUTION LIST................................................................................................21

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

KPI and Configuration Check List

Cluster Site list:

Site ID Site Name

ETF827 ETF827A

ETF827 ETF827B

ETF827 ETF827C

Backhaul capacity check:

Designed Capacity E2E capacity check Source Status

(Matched/unmatched)

Configuration

CGI:

Cell Value

ETF827A

ETF827B

ETF827C

TAC

ETF827

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

Configuration Check list:

Item Information Source StatusFeature: LTE Session continuity to GSM/3G CM LTE & DT

Feature: LTE Reselection to GSM/3G CM LTE & DT

Feature: Intra-Automatic Neighbor Reporting CM LTE & DT or trace

Feature: Inter-Automatic Neighbor Reporting CM LTE & DT or trace

Feature: GSM/3G reselection to LTE CM 2G/3G & DT

Feature: Directed reselection to LTE from 2G/3G CM GSM/3G & DT

Feature: SMS origination/termination within LTE CM LTE Only

Feature: Multi Technology HO between FDD>TDD>FDD CM LTE Only

Feature: CSFB to 3G(UMTS 2100) CM LTE OnlyFeature: MIMO type CM LTE& LTE

Feature: CSFB to 3G(UMTS900) CM 3G/GSM If Applicable

Feature: X2 Handover CM LTE & DT

Number of concurrent users license CM LTE

System priority:

Technology Priority

LTE TDD 2.3 1

LTE FDD 1800 2

3G 1st carrier 3

3G 2nd

carrier 4

3G 3rd carrier 5

GSM 6

Test -KPI Value (Min, Avg,

Max)

LIMIT RESULT

(PASS/FAIL)

COMMENT

Session SetupSuccess rateDL_SINR>0dBDL_RSRP>-100dBm

97.00% pass/Fail

Minutes betweenE-RAB AbnormalReleases

25min pass/Fail

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

Session Abnormal

Release RateDL_SINR>0dBDL_RSRP>-100dBm

2.00% pass/Fail

Mobility LTEIntra HandoverSuccess Rate

100%95.00% pass/Fail

Pass

CSFB (Idle) MOSuccess Rate %

100% 99% Pass/Fail

CSFB

(Dedicated) MOSuccess Rate %

99% Pass/Fail

CSFB (Idle) MTSuccess Rate %

100% 99% Pass/Fail

CSFB(Dedicated) MTSuccess Rate %

99% Pass/Fail

SMS MO IdleSuccess Rate %

99% Pass/Fail

SMS MODedicatedSuccess Rate %

99% Pass/Fail

SMS MT IdleSuccess Rate %

99% Pass/Fail

SMS MTDedicatedSuccess Rate %

99% Pass/Fail

*) This Target value is the standard value that must be met using a conventional LTE SIM card during the drive test.

Overall result: Brief Description of the overall results

Comments: Drive test KPI details:

Ping Server: IP= 10.16.17.253

UL/DL FTP Server: IP= 10.16.17.253

All drive test KPI are collected by only TEMSInvestigation measurements.

Miscellaneous:

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

1 Cluster/Site Overview

Figure 1 Cluster/Site Location on Map



Number of Sites in cluster or Site Name: ETF827

Integration Status:

Alarm Status (from integrated sites):

Cell Availability (from integrated sites):

EARFCN(s) DL/UL: 1752/19752

DL/UL Configuration:

Bandwidth: 10 MHZTest Duration:

Table 1: Summary of Cluster/Site status

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

2 Summary of Analysis

<Insert summary of results and of any suggestions for improvement specifying desiredoutcome>

<All results in details are summarized in the Final Acceptance report >

3 Test Methodology

<Insert description of the drive test methodology and equipment used during the drive

test>

Insert short description of the drive test route and the difficulties and circumstancesfaced during the drive test, if any]

[This chapter shou ld be the same for al l clusters unless ch anges are required]

4 Reference Signal

Below are the results of the scanned reference signal data from the cluster. All datapresented is binned at 25m intervals

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

4.1 Best Server

4.1.1 Best server Plots

Figure 2: Best Server Plot (no Binning)

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

4.2 RSRP Cluster Results

4.2.1 RSRP Plots prior and after initial tuning activities

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

Figure 3: Cluster RSRP After initial tuning activities – Scanner [binned]

4.2.2 RSRP Statistics

See Table for breakdown of RSRP samples statistics for drive area

Figure 4: Cluster RSRP Distribution After initial tuning activities [No Binning]

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

4.3 RSRQ Cluster Results

4.3.1 RSRQ Plots prior and after initial tuning activities

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

Figure 5: Cluster RSRQ After initial tuning activities – Scanner [binned]

4.3.2 RSRQ Statistics

See Table for breakdown of RSRQ samples statistics for drive area

Figure 6: Cluster RSRQ Distribution After initial tuning activities [No Binning]

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

4.3.3 RSRP and RSRQ Statistics

Table 2: Cluster RSRP vs. RSRQ After initial tuning activities – Scanner [binned]

Target (in case available full cluster ): 80% of the measured samples within the cluster arefulfilling:

RSRP >= -110dBm and RSRQ >= -15dBm

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

Figure 7: RSRP vs. RSRQ Distribution After initial tuning activities

4.4SINR Cluster Results

Below is the SINR Analysis, based on the SINR report.

4.4.1SINR Plots

Figure 8: Cluster SINR After initial tuning activities - Scanner [binned]

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

4.4.2 SINR Statistics

Figure 9: SINR Distribution after initial tuning activities [No Binning]

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

5 Throughput Analysis

5.1 Actual DL Throughput from UE

DL Throughput data reported from LTE UE for FTP Sessions

5.2 DL Throughput plot

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

Figure 10: Cluster DL Throughput Plot [No Binning]

5.2.1 DL Throughput vs. SINR Statistics

Graph of all measured samples throughput values recorded during drive test

Figure 11: Cluster DL Throughput vs. SINR [No Binning]

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

Target: see below table:

Average DL User Throughput

Stationary Test (best location)

Value ( average,max)

Target Result(pass/fail)

Comment

No condition

Avg: 71.7 Mbps

Max: 73.5 Mbps

≥55 Mbps

≥70 Mbps

pass/Fail Red Target Value can

only be considered if

STC provides Vendor

with Priority LTE class

SIM card.

Average DL User Throughput

(DLUT) Mobile



Comment

DLUT Quality Low

(Cell edge)

0dB ≤ DL_SINR < 7dB

DL_RSRP>-100dBm

Avg: 31.2 Mbps

Max: 34.3 Mbps

≥5.5 Mbps *)≥7 Mbps

pass/Fail Red Target Value canonly be considered ifSTC provides Vendorwith Priority LTE classSIM card.

DLUT Medium

(Mid Cell)

7dB ≤ DL_SINR < 15.5dB

DL_RSRP>-100dBm

Avg: 49.3 Mbps

Max: 52.3 Mbps

≥11 Mbps *)≥14 Mbps


DLUT High

(Under antennas)

DL_SINR ≥ 15.5dB

DL_RSRP>-100dBm

Avg: 71.7 Mbps

Max: 73.5 Mbps

≥20 Mbps *)≥30 Mbps



7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

5.3 Actual UL Throughput from UE

UL Throughput data reported from LTE UE for FTP Sessions

5.4 UL Throughput plot

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

Figure 12: Cluster UL Throughput Plot [No Binning]

5.4.1 UL Throughput vs. SINR Statistics

Graph of all throughput samples values recorded during drive test

Figure 13: Cluster UL Throughput vs. SINR [No Binning]

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

Target: see below table

Average UL User ThroughputStationary Test (best location)



Comment

No condition

Avg: 23.0 Mbps

Max: 25.9 Mbps

≥10 Mbps


only be considered if

STC provides Vendor

with Priority LTE class

SIM card.

Average UL User Throughput(ULUT)



Comment

ULUT Quality Low

(Cell edge)

-100dBm ≤ DL_RSRP < -90dBm

Avg: 5.6 Mbps

Max: 8.6 Mbps

≥1.5 Mbps


only be considered ifSTC provides Vendorwith Priority LTE classSIM card.

ULUT Medium

(Mid Cell)

-90dBm ≤ DL_RSRP < -80dBm

Avg: 19.0 Mbps

Max:22.4 Mbps

≥2.5 Mbpspass/Fail Red Target Value can


ULUT High

(Under Antenna)

DL_RSRP ≥ -80dBm

Avg: 23.0 Mbps

Max: 25.9 Mbps

≥5 Mbpspass/Fail Red Target Value can



7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

5.4.2 End to End Latency Statistics RTT (Round Trip Time)

All RTT values recorded by the second UE during drive test

Target: see below table

Round Trip Time RTT (msec) Stationary Value (min,average,)


No condition (32 bytes data)RAN located at different geographicalarea as the EPC there is a large

distance between the two entities.

14 ms

15 ms

≤35 ms

≤45 ms

pass/Fail

Round Trip Time (RTT) Mobile

DL_SINR>0dB

DL_RSRP>-100dBm

Excluding the worst 2..5% of RTT values.

RAN located at the same geographicalarea as the EPC

≤35ms Pass/fail

Round Trip Time (RTT) Mobile

DL_SINR>0dB

DL_RSRP>-100dBm

Excluding the worst 2..5% of RTT

≤45ms Pass/fail

Values.

RAN located at different geographical area as

the EPC there is a large distance between the

two entities.

6 Trouble Spots and areas

<Insert any considerable difficulties faced during drive test as well as during the initial tuning ofthe cluster and where Vendor might need support from STC >

<Insert technical remedies and solutions in order to enhance the quality of the RSRP, RSRQ,SINR, DL TP and UL TP…etc at these particular trouble spots and areas>.

<Insert any comment related to these particular trouble spots and areas that you want to sharewith the Optimization Responsible at STC>.

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


/ 2013

Figure 14: Trouble Spot/Area Map

7 Change Requests

List of all change requests made during the initial tuning activities

7.1 Physical Change Requests

<Insert Physical Change requests Tracker for cluster/ Site>

Site ID Changes Old value New value Comment

7.2 Parameter Change Requests

<Insert Cluster/ Site wide parameter changes>

Site ID Parameter Previous value New Value Comment

Getting interference in Sec-B

7/27/2019 FDD_SSV


Site name ETF827


7.3 Drive test Diary

<Insert drive test diary as xls object if needed>

7.4 Alarm Details

<Insert alarm printout for alarms checked during drive>

Site ID Alarm type Cause of the Alarm Date of clearance Comment

8 Appendixes

<Insert any valuable appendix>

TEMS log files, Cluster list of sites …

9 Distribution List

For your Information

1. xx

2. xx

3. xx

Receiver

1. xx

2. xx

3. xx

fdd_ssv

Documents