failure analysis on the drillpipe due to the twist-off
TRANSCRIPT
ii
FAILURE ANALYSIS ON THE DRILLPIPE DUE TO THE TWIST-OFF
MOHD IQBAL BIN MOHD ZOLKEPELI
Report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirementsfor the award of the degree of
Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering
FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANG
iii
SUPERVISOR’S DECLARATION
We hereby declare that we have checked this project report and in our opinion this
project is satisfactory in terms of scope and quality for the award of the degree of
Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering with “specialization”.
Signature:
Name of Supervisor: Pn. Nurul Shahida Bt Mohd Shalahim
Position: Lecturer
Date: 11 November 2008
Signature:
Name of Panel: En. Zamri Bin Mohamed
Position: Lecturer
Date: 11 November 2008
iv
STUDENT’S DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the work in this report is my own except for quotations and
summaries which have been duly acknowledged. The report has not been accepted for
any degree and is not concurently submitted for award of other degree.
Signature
Name: Mohd Iqbal Bin Mohd Zolkepeli
ID Number: MA05041
Date: 11 November 2008
v
To my beloved mother, father and family, the love of my life
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It is a great sense of pleasure that I acknowledge the help and guidance Ihave
receive from a numerous people during the course of my stay at Universiti Malaysia
Pahang. My supervisor Pn. Nurul Shahida Bt Mohd Shalahim provided me with energy,
enthusiasm and insight to work on this interesting final year project. I am very much
thankful to them for all their support in conducting and writing up my work. Moreover, I
would like to express my heartfelt and sincere for their priceless guidance and support
during my final year. In addition to being my supervisor, she also helps me a lot with
advices related to industries.
Furthermore, I also would like to thank Mr Mahendran A/L Samykano as my
co-supervisor that is very helpful, easy going and understanding person. Not forgetting
my fellow friends who gave me a lot of ideas and helps in designing and doing the
analysis. Without them, I would have been nowhere near completing my project which I
also learnt the importance of team working. Thanks to almighty God, for giving me the
life and hope to finish this project without any major problem.
Last but not least, special thanks goes to my beloved parents who supported me
from the very beginning to achieve my goals and sacrifice much in their life for my
well-being. I am indebted to their painstaking attitude, which always kept me on the
right track.
vii
ABSTRACT
This thesis reports on the design and analysis for failure at three different drill
pipes. When drilling boreholes, for example in the Oil & Gas industry, a hole is drilled
into the ground which can be several kilometers long. One of main type of problem that
can occur while drilling is the torque on the drill pipe can cause it to break (called twist-
off). This problem results in drilling delays. Twist-offs also usually results in loss of
expensive equipment. Therefore, ALGOR software has been use as the FEA tool to do
the analysis to reduce this problem. Six different values of torque range from 2000 N.m
to 3000 N.m is applied to the end of the pipe stand which is consist of three assembly of
pipes. The materials of the pipe have been chosen are AISI 1010, ASTM A36 and AISI
4150 steels that have different mechanical properties the see the differences. The test
results show that AISI 4150 is the most suitable material to use which gives 2800 N.m
torque value before it starts to fail. Meanwhile, a constant pattern of failure has
determined for these three pipes at the same location of the second engaged thread of the
pipe assembly, between the male and female thread at the joint. For improvement, to see
the differences from another point of view, the analysis for this drill pipe design is
suggested to do with different thickness and length in order to analyze how much the
maximum allowable torque value can be applied to the pipe before it starts to fail.
viii
ABSTRAK
Tesis ini melaporkan tentang rekabentuk dan analisis kegagalan pada tiga jenis
paip gerudi. Apabila proses gerudi dijalankan, sebagai contoh di industry minyak & gas,
permukaan tanak digerudi dengan menggunakan paip untuk membuat lubang sejauh
melebihi berkilo-kilo meter. Salah satu masalah yang dihadapi ketika proses menggerudi
ialah pemintalan paip gerudi yang menyebabkan paip itu patah. Masalah ini
menyebabkan penangguhan proses menggerudi. Pemintalan kebiasaannya akan
menyebabkan kerosakan peralatan – peralatan yang berkos tinggi. Oleh itu, software
ALGOR digunakan sebagai salah satu unsur FEA untuk menganalis kegagalan yang
berlaku pada paip gerudi untuk mengurangkan masalah ini. Enam nilai tenaga putaran
yang berbeza bernilai dari 2000 N.m ke 3000 N.m telah dikenakan kepada hujung paip
yang terdiri daripada tiga sambungan batang paip. Antara bahan aloi yang dipilih adalah
AISI 1010, ASTM A36 dan AISI 4150 yang mempunyai sifat mekanikal yang berlainan
antara satu sama lain. Berdasarkan analysis, AISI 4125 adalah bahan yang paling sesuai
untuk digunakan kerana nilai tenaga putaran maksima yang boleh dikenakan adalah
yang tertinggi iaitu 2800 N.m sebelum ia gagal. Sementara itu, corak kegagalan yang
sejajar dikenalpasti pada ketiga-tiga jenis paip ini yang berlaku pada sambungan kedua
paip. Untuk penambahbaikkan, analisis ini dicadangkan untuk menggunakan ketebalan
dan panjang paip yang berbeza untuk melihat perbezaan nilai tenaga putaran maksima
yang boleh dikenakan kepada paip gerudi sebelum ia gagal.
ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE
DECLARATIONS ii
DEDICATION iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT v
ABSTRACT vi
ABSTRAK vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS viii
LIST OF TABLES xiii
LIST OF FIGURES xiv
LIST OF SYMBOLS xvii
LIST OF APPENDICES xviii
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Overview 1
1.2 Project Problem Statement 2
1.3 Project Objectives 3
1.4 Project Scopes 3
1.5 Project Organization Report 3
1.6 Project Planning 4
x
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction 5
2.2 Petroleum Drilling 5
2.2.1 Borehole Drilling 6
2.2.2 Drill String 6
2.2.3 Drill Pipe 6
2.3 Failure of Drill Pipe 7
2.3.1 Twist off 8
2.4 Failure Analysis 8
2.5 Failure Criteria 9
2.5.1 Von Misses Stress 9
2.6 Materials 10
2.6.1 The American Iron 10
and Steel Institute (AISI)
2.6.2 Factor in Material Selection 11
2.6.2.1 Mechanical Factor 11
2.6.2.2 Life of Component Factors 11
2.7 Example of Research 12
2.7.1 Research by M. Veidt and A. Berezovski, 12
Division of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Queensland, Brisbane.
xi
2.7.2 Research by K.A. Macdonald and J.V. Bjune, 13
University of Stavanger,
4036 Stavanger, Norway.
2.7.3 Research by Stanislaw Bednarz. 13
2.7.4 Research by TCR Engineering Services 14
Technical Team, 2004.
3 METHODOLOGY
3.1 The Methodology 16
3.2 Literature Review 17
3.3 Research’s Focus 17
3.4 Collecting Data 17
3.5 Design of Drill Pipe Using 17
Solidworks 2007
3.6 Finite Element Analysis 18
3.6.1 Linear Static Analysis 18
3.6.2 Build/Mesh Model 18
3.6.3 Element and Material Type 19
3.6.4 Boundary Condition and Load Application 19
3.6.5 Analyzed Model 19
3.6.6 Von Misses Stress 20
xii
3.7 Recommendation 20
3.8 Documentation 20
3.9 Flowchart of Methodology 21
4 RESULT & DISCUSSION
4.1 Failure Analysis 22
4.2 Drill Pipe Design 22
4.3 ALGOR Analysis 24
4.4 Theoretical Calculation 25
4.5 Analysis of AISI 1010 Steel 27
4.5.1 Conclusion 31
4.6 Analysis of ASTM A36 Steel 31
4.6.1 Conclusion 35
4.7 Analysis of AISI 4150 Steel 36
4.7.1 Conclusion 40
4.8 Discussion 40
5 CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Introduction 42
5.2 Conclusion 42
5.2.1 Accomplishment of Part 1 42
5.2.2 Accomplishment of Part 2 43
xiii
5.3 Recommendations 45
5.3.1 Thickness of Drill Pipe 45
5.3.2 Length of Drill Pipe 45
5.3.3 Analysis base on another Failure Criteria 46
REFERENCES 47
APPENDICES A-C 49 - 63
xiv
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE
4.1 The properties of the AISI 1010 Steel 27
4.2 The conclusion of analysis AISI 1010 Steel 31
4.3 The properties of the ASTM A36 Steel 31
4.4 The conclusion of analysis ASTM A36 Steel 35
4.5 Physical and mechanical properties 36
of AISI 4150 Steel
4.6 The conclusion of analysis for AISI 4150 Steel 40
xv
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE
1.1 Project Planning for both 4
Final Year Project 1 and 2
2.1 The example of drill pipe 7
2.2 The drilling process 8
2.3 The design of male and female pipe threaded 12
2.4 Torque-Tension Limits diagram for 5x29/16" 14
NC38 tool joint on 31/2", 13,30 lb/ft S-135 drill pipe
3.1 The Methodology’s Flowchart for the whole 21
Final Year Project
4.1 The 3D male threaded pipe 23
4.2 Shows the 2D female threaded pipe 23
4.3 The joint between 2 pipes 24
4.4 The top view of the pipe which torque is applied 24
4.5 The bottom view of the drill pipe 25
which is fix boundary condition
4.6 The maximum stress value for 2000 N.m, 28
xvi
AISI 1010
4.7 The maximum stress value for 2200 N.m, 28
AISI 1010
4.8 The maximum stress value for 2400 N.m, 29
AISI 1010
4.9 The maximum stress value for 2600 N.m, 29
AISI 1010
4.10 The maximum stress value for 2800 N.m, 30
AISI 1010
4.11 The maximum stress value for 3000 N.m, 30
AISI 1010
4.12 The maximum stress value for 2000 N.m, 32
ASTM A36
4.13 The maximum stress value for 2200 N.m, 33
ASTM A36
4.14 The maximum stress value for 2400 N.m, 33
ASTM A36
4.15 The maximum stress value for 2600 N.m, 34
ASTM A36
4.16 The maximum stress value for 2800 N.m, 34
xvii
ASTM A36
4.17 The maximum stress value for 3000 N.m, 35
ASTM A36
4.18 The maximum stress value for 2000 N.m, 37
AISI 4150
4.19 The maximum stress value for 2200 N.m, 37
AISI 4150
4.20 The maximum stress value for 2400 N.m, 38
AISI 4150
4.21 The maximum stress value for 2600 N.m, 38
AISI 4150
4.22 The maximum stress value for 2800 N.m, 39
AISI 4150
4.23 The maximum stress value for 3000 N.m, 39
AISI 4150
5.1 The Flowchart for Final Year Project 1 43
5.2 The Flowchart for Final Year Project 2 44
xviii
LIST OF SYMBOLS
T - Motor torque
P - Pressure
C1 - Inner radius of the drill pipe
C2 - Outer radius of the pipe
J - Moment of inertia
τ - Shearing stress
t1 - Pipe thickness
d1 - Inner diameter of the drill pipe
d2 - Outer diameter of the drill pipe
xix
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX TITLE PAGE
A Drilling process & pipe design 49 – 51
B ALGOR analysis 52 – 60
C List of Tables 61 - 63
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW
Drilling engineering is a subset of petroleum engineering. It is primarily involved
in the design and drilling of production and injection wells. The drilling engineer has the
responsibility for the efficient penetration of the earth by a well bore, and for cementing
of the steel casing from the surface to a depth usually just about the target reservoir. The
Oil & Gas industry is involved in the global processes of exploration, extraction,
refining, transporting (often with oil tankers and pipelines), and marketing petroleum
products. The largest volume products of the industry are fuel oil and gasoline (petrol).
Petroleum is also the raw material for many chemical products, including
pharmaceuticals, solvents, fertilizers, pesticides, and plastics. Petroleum is vital to many
industries, and is of importance to the maintenance of industrialized civilization itself,
and thus is critical concern to many nations.
The usual problem in petroleum drilling is failure due to fatigue. Failure due to
fatigue is a very costly problem in oil and gas industry. Drillstring failure occurs on 14-
percent of all rigs and the resulting downtime costs roughly $106 000 per event. A
survey of all drilling problems reported worldwide over a 15-month period shows that
36-percent were due to stuck pipe. Stuck pipe cost estimates for the worldwide drilling
industry range as high as $250 million for this period. The threaded connection of the
2
type used in hydrocarbon exploration is a critical component of the drillstring that is
highly susceptible to fatigue damage. Fatigue crack growth can either lead to a
catastrophic failure of the connection, known as a twist-off, or can be a non-critical
failure, known as a wash-out.
Failure in most cases is restricted to either the drill pipe located at the upset regions
or at the threaded connections. External damage arising from poor pipe handling
practices can occasionally lead to failure at random locations along the length of the
drillpipe. The range of commonly encountered primary damage mechanisms covers
ductile fracture, brittle fracture, fatigue and stress corrosion cracking. Various simple
and complex combinations can also occur. A consistent feature where twist-off has
occurred is that post-separation damage to fracture surfaces can often be very severe,
obliterating much of the detail of the fracture morphology required to aid identification
of the failure mode. This is due to the failure remaining undetected at the surface and
consequently both weight-on-bit and rotation continues. In addition, the large pressure
differential drives flow of the mud from pipe bore to annulus should a leak path become
available, resulting in wash-out damage.
1.2 PROJECT PROBLEM STATEMENT
When drilling boreholes, for example in the Oil & Gas industry, a hole is drilled
into the ground which can be several kilometers long. One of main type of problem that
can occur whilst drilling is the torque on the drill pipe can cause it to break (called twist-
off). This problem results in drilling delays. Twist-offs also usually results in loss of
expensive equipment.
3
1.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The project is conducted to achieve the following objectives:-
i) To do the failure analysis on the drillpipe for directional borehole
drilling.
ii) To find the desirable maximum allowable torque can be applied to the
drillstring to reduce its failure.
1.4 PROJECT SCOPES
The project scopes are:-
i) The borehole drilling only consider for directional borehole drilling.
ii) The focus on problem is only for and ‘twist-off’- (the torque on the drill pipe can
cause it to break).
iii) Drill pipes are manufactured to different lengths and diameters. This
investigation focuses on NQ drill pipes, which are mainly used for directional
exploration drilling.
iv) The ALGOR Software will be used as the tool of Finite Element Analysis .
1.5 PROJECT ORGANIZATION REPORT
The rest of the report is organized as follows:-
There are 4 more chapters to be discussed which are Chapter 2, 3, 4 and 5. The
literature review of this research will be explained further in chapter 2. In this chapter,
the overview and explanation for failure analysis will be discussed. The description of
step of method will be briefed detail in chapter 3. This chapter is more to the method
that use in conducting this research. In chapter 4, the process performance on the failure
analysis will be discussed. Discussion will be included in this chapter. Finally in chapter
4
5, all the results will be concluded in this chapter. Recommendation to improve the
petroleum borehole drilling process performance also will be suggested.
1.6 PROJECT PLANNING
Figure 1.1 : Project Planning for both Final Year Project 1 and 2.
Start
Conformation of title, objective and scope
Literature Review
Project Methodology
End
Submission of draft report
Submission of final report
Analysis and Discussions
5
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The main purpose of this literature review is to get information about the project
from the reference books, magazines, journal, technical papers and web sites. In this
chapter the discussion will be made base on all the sources.
2.2 PETROLEUM DRILLING
The crew sets up the rig and starts the drilling operations. First, from the starter
hole, they drill a surface hole down to a pre-set depth, which is somewhere above where
they think the oil trap is located. There are five basic steps to drilling the surface hole:
1. Place the drill bit, collar and drill pipe in the hole.
2. Attach the kelly and turntable and begin drilling.
3. As drilling progresses, circulate mud through the pipe and out of the bit to float
the rock cuttings out of the hole.
4. Add new sections (joints) of drill pipes as the hole gets deeper.
5. Remove (trip out) the drill pipe, collar and bit when the pre-set depth (anywhere
from a few hundred to a couple-thousand feet) is reached.
Once they reach the pre-set depth, they must run and cement the casing which is
place casing-pipe sections into the hole to prevent it from collapsing in on itself. The
casing pipe has spacers around the outside to keep it centered in the hole. The casing
6
crew puts the casing pipe in the hole. The cement crew pumps cement down the casing
pipe using a bottom plug, a cement slurry, a top plug and drill mud. The pressure from
the drill mud causes the cement slurry to move through the casing and fill the space
between the outside of the casing and the hole. Finally, the cement is allowed to harden
and then tested for such properties as hardness, alignment and a proper seal.
2.2.1 Borehole Drilling
Borehole is the hole drilled by the bit(wellbore). This term also is define by a
circular hole made by boring, especially a deep hole of small diameter such as oil & gas
or water well. Borehole drilling is the extraction of minerals in liquid or gaseous state
from the Earth’s crust by mean of boreholes and suction pumps. Boreholes are used for
mining petroleum and for the extraction of liquid solution of salts, sulfur.
2.2.2 Drill String
A drill string on an oil rig is a column, or string, of drill pipe that transmits
drilling fluid (via the mud pumps) and rotational power (via the kelly drive or top drive)
to the drill bit. The term is loosely applied as the assembled collection of the drill pipe,
drill collars, tools and drill bit. The drill string is hollow so that Drilling fluid can be
pumped down through it and circulated back up the annulus (void between the drill
string and the formation).
2.2.3 Drill Pipe
Drill pipe makes up the majority of a drill string. A drill string is typically about
15,000 feet in length for an oil or gas well vertically drilled onshore in the United States
and may extend to over 30,000 feet for an offshore deviated well.