factor of safety for different foundations

Upload: heong-siew-lin

Post on 07-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Foundations

TRANSCRIPT

  • FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR DIFFERENTFOUNDATIONS

    Factor of safety and allowable pressure:

    Allowable bearing pressure, from shear strength consideration, is only a fraction of the ultimate

    bearing capacity and is defined by the equation

    Where, = factor of safety against shear failure

    = effective overburden pressure at foundation depth

    The required factor of safety depends upon:

    Type of structure permanent or temporary1.

    Sensitivity of structure2.

    Extent of soil exploration3.

    Nature of loading considered and assumption made in the design4.

    Extent of quality control during construction.5.

    It is recommended that the factor of safety should be between 2 and 4. The following table may

    be used as a guide for permanent structures in reasonably homogeneous soil conditions.

    Minimum value of safety factor for design of shallow foundations (as per Vesic, 1970)

    Category Typical Structure Characteristics of

    the category

    Soil Exploration

    FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR DIFFERENT FOUNDATIONS h0p://theconstructor.org/geotechnical/factor-of-safety-for-di...

    1 of 5 10/11/15 4:17 PM

  • Thorough

    A Railway bridge,

    Warehouses, blast

    furnaces, silos, hydraulic

    retaining walls

    Maximum design load

    likely to occur often,

    consequence of failure

    disastrous

    3.0

    B Highway bridge, light

    industrial and public

    buildings

    Maximum design load

    may occur

    occasionally,

    consequence of failure

    serious

    2.5

    C Apartments and office

    buildings

    Maximum design load

    unlikely to occur

    2.0

    Note:

    FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR DIFFERENT FOUNDATIONS h0p://theconstructor.org/geotechnical/factor-of-safety-for-di...

    2 of 5 10/11/15 4:17 PM

  • The selection of factor of safety for design can not be made properly without assessing the

    degree of reliability of all other parameters that enter into design, such as design loads,

    strength and deformation characteristics of the soil mass etc. Each case should therefore be

    considered on its merits.

    1.

    For temporary structures, above values should be reduced to 75% with the minimum not less

    than 2.0

    2.

    For exceptionally tall buildings, such as chimneys and towers, or generally whenever

    progressive bearing capacity failure may be feared, the values should be increased by 20 to

    50%.

    3.

    The possibility of flooding of foundation soil and / or removal of existing overburden by scour

    or excavation should be given adequate consideration.

    4.

    It is advisable to check both the short term (end of construction) and long term stability,

    unless one of the two conditions is clearly less favourable.

    5.

    It is understood that all the foundations will be analysed also with respect to maximum

    tolerable total and differential settlement. If settlement governs the design, higher factor of

    safety may be used.

    6.

    FACTOR OF SAFETY AND ALLOWABLE CAPACITY OF PILE

    (A) For downward loading

    i. (Factor of safety) = 2.5 when both end bearing and shaft resistance are considered. This

    value should be reduced upto 2.0 if sufficient number of pile load tests are conducted to ensure

    that will never fall below 2.

    ii. = 1.5 for shaft resistance and =3 for end bearing. However, based on both end

    bearing and shaft resistance should be greater than 2.

    Approach (ii) should be given greater weightage. Further, even when allowable load is estimated

    based on (i) above, it is essential to ensure that it is not less than estimated by (ii). It is

    essential to have higher factor of safety in end bearing than in shaft resistance. With negative

    stress friction acting, factor of safety as above should be obtained. With negative friction, the

    factor of safety should not be less than 2.

    FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR DIFFERENT FOUNDATIONS h0p://theconstructor.org/geotechnical/factor-of-safety-for-di...

    3 of 5 10/11/15 4:17 PM

  • (B) For uplift conditions

    = 2.5

    could be reduced to 2, if the capacity of pile could be established by a pull-out test.

    be further reduced to 1.5 if the weight of the pile itself is 0.75 times the uplift force or greater.

    FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR EMBANKMENTS ETC

    The value of factor of safety considered in the case of earthwork, i.e., cuts, embankments, dams

    are much lower than those considered usually adopted in design of other structures. High safety

    factors wil result in uneconomical design of earthwork structures. It is found from practices that

    lower values of safety factors are quite satisfactory in earthwork. The following table gives values

    of factor of safety for different earthwork.

    Description of earthwork Safety Factors

    Embankments, end of construction 1.0 to 1.2

    *cuts, end of construction 1.2 and over

    Embankments, long term stability 1.2 to 1.4

    *cuts, long term stability 1.2 to 1.4

    Earthdams 1.5 and above

    Earthdams extreme conditions of loading (i.e. severe flood

    followed by sudden drawdown)

    1.1 to 1.25

    *For cuts, safety factor has usually higher values at end of construction rather than at some

    FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR DIFFERENT FOUNDATIONS h0p://theconstructor.org/geotechnical/factor-of-safety-for-di...

    4 of 5 10/11/15 4:17 PM

  • future time.

    Related Topics

    FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR DIFFERENT FOUNDATIONS h0p://theconstructor.org/geotechnical/factor-of-safety-for-di...

    5 of 5 10/11/15 4:17 PM