facility [mfrg
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
1/80
Slide 0 of 96
Compiled by Prof. P.B.Owalekar
Facility Layout:Manufacturing and Services
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
2/80
Slide 1 of 96
Overview
Introduction Manufacturing Facility Layouts
Analyzing Manufacturing Facility Layouts
Service Facility Layouts Wrap-Up: What World-Class Producers Do
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
3/80
Slide 2 of 96
Introduction
Facility layout means planning: for the location of all machines, utilities, employee
workstations, customer service areas, material
storage areas, aisles, restrooms, lunchrooms,
internal walls, offices, and computer rooms
for the flow patterns of materials and people
around, into, and within buildings
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
4/80
Slide 3 of 96
Locate All Areas In and Around Buildings
Equipment Work stations
Material storage
Rest/break areas Utilities
Eating areas
Aisles Offices
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
5/80
Slide 4 of 96
Characteristics of the Facility Layout Decision
Location of these various areas impacts the flowthrough the system.
The layout can affect productivity and costs generated
by the system.
Layout alternatives are limited by
the amount and type of space required for the
various areas
the amount and type of space available
the operations strategy
. . . more
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
6/80
Slide 5 of 96
Characteristics of the Facility Layout Decision
Layout decisions tend to be: Infrequent
Expensive to implement
Studied and evaluated extensively Long-term commitments
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
7/80Slide 6 of 96
Objectives of the Lay out Strategy
Develop an economical layout which will meet the
requirements of:
product design and volume (product strategy)
Process equipment and capacity (process strategy)
quality of work life (human resource strategy)
building and site constraints (location strategy)
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
8/80Slide 7 of 96
Requirements of a Good Layout
A good layout requires:
an understanding of capacity & space requirements
selection of appropriate material handling equipment
decisions regarding environment and aesthetics
identification and understanding of the requirements
for information flow
identification of the cost of moving between thevarious work areas
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
9/80Slide 8 of 96
Inputs to the Layout Decision
1. Specification of objectives of the system in terms ofoutput and flexibility.
2. Estimation of product or service demand on thesystem.
3. Processing requirements in terms of number ofoperations and amount of flow between departmentsand work centers.
4. Space requirements for the elements in the layout.
5. Space availability within the facility itself.
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
10/80Slide 9 of 96
Steps in Developing a Process Oriented Layout
Construct a from-to matrix
Determine space requirements for each department
Develop an initial schematic diagram
Determine the cost of this layout By trial-and error (or more sophisticated means), try to
improve the initial layout
Prepare a detailed plan that evaluates factors in
addition to transportation cost
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
11/80Slide 10 of 96
Warehouse & Storage Layout
General Cost Curve
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Warehouse Density
Line 1
Line 2
Line 3The best warehouse layout is where
total costs are at a minimum
Material handling cost
(mostly variable)
Costs include:
Equipment
DamagePosition & Find
Investment
Material storage cost
(mostly fixed)
Costs include:
Land & building
Building & insurance
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
12/80Slide 11 of 96
Manufacturing Facility Layouts
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
13/80Slide 12 of 96
Basic Layout Forms
Process Product
Cellular
Fixed position Hybrid
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
14/80Slide 13 of 96
Process (Job Shop) Layouts
Equipment that perform similar processes aregrouped together
Used when the operations system must handle a wide
variety of products in relatively small volumes (i.e.,
flexibility is necessary)
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
15/80Slide 14 of 96
Characteristics of Process Layouts
General-purpose equipment is used Changeover is rapid
Material flow is intermittent
Material handling equipment is flexible Operators are highly skilled
. . . more
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
16/80Slide 15 of 96
Characteristics of Process Layouts
Technical supervision is required Planning, scheduling and controlling functions are
challenging
Production time is relatively long
In-process inventory is relatively high
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
17/80Slide 16 of 96
Product (Assembly Line) Layouts
Operations are arranged in the sequence required tomake the product
Used when the operations system must handle a
narrow variety of products in relatively high volumes
Operations and personnel are dedicated to producing
one or a small number of products
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
18/80Slide 17 of 96
Characteristics of Product Layouts
Special-purpose equipment are used Changeover is expensive and lengthy
Material flow approaches continuous
Material handling equipment is fixed Operators need not be as skilled
. . .more
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
19/80Slide 18 of 96
Characteristics of Product Layouts
Little direct supervision is required Planning, scheduling and controlling functions are
relatively straight-forward
Production time for a unit is relatively short
In-process inventory is relatively low
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
20/80
Slide 19 of 96
Cellular Manufacturing (CM) Layouts
Operations required to produce a particular family(group) of parts are arranged in the sequence required
to make that family
Used when the operations system must handle a
moderate variety of products in moderate volumes
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
21/80
Slide 20 of 96
Characteristics of CM
Relative to Process Layouts
Equipment can be less general-purpose Material handling costs are reduced
Training periods for operators are shortened
In-process inventory is lower Parts can be made faster and shipped more quickly
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
22/80
Slide 21 of 96
Characteristics of CM
Relative to a Product Layout
Equipment can be less special-purpose Changeovers are simplified
Production is easier to automate
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
23/80
Slide 22 of 96
Fixed-Position Layouts
Product remains in a fixed position, and thepersonnel, material and equipment come to it
Used when the product is very bulky, large, heavy or
fragile
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
24/80
Slide 23 of 96
Hybrid Layouts
Actually, most manufacturing facilities use acombination of layout types.
An example of a hybrid layout is where departments
are arranged according to the types of processes but
the products flow through on a product layout.
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
25/80
Slide 24 of 96
New Trends in Manufacturing Layouts
Designed for quality and flexibility Ability to quickly shift to different product models or
to different production rates
Cellular layout within larger process layouts
Automated material handling
U-shaped production lines
. . . more
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
26/80
Slide 25 of 96
New Trends in Manufacturing Layouts
More open work areas with fewer walls, partitions, orother obstacles
Smaller and more compact factory layouts
Less space provided for storage of inventories
throughout the layout
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
27/80
Slide 26 of 96
Process Layouts Product Layouts
Cellular Layouts
Analyzing Manufacturing Facility Layouts
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
28/80
Slide 27 of 96
Process Layout
What factors might we consider when determiningthe locations of process areas, or departments?
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
29/80
Slide 28 of 96
Designing and Analyzing a Process Layout
Group like processes together into departments orwork centers
Determine where in the building these departments
will be located relative to one another
The objective is to arrange the departments so that
some criterion such as material-handling cost is
minimized
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
30/80
Slide 29 of 96
Approaches to Process Layout Design
Operations sequence analysis Block diagram analysis
Load-distance analysis
Computer analysis
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
31/80
Slide 30 of 96
Operations Sequence Analysis
Inputs required an existing or proposed arrangement of
departments
a projection of the traffic or flow that will take
place between one department and each of the
other departments during some time period - this is
usually displayed as an interdepartmental flow
matrix . . .more
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
32/80
Slide 31 of 96
Operations Sequence Analysis
Departments are represented by nodes (circles) Using the interdepartmental flow information, flows
between adjacent departments are represented by
solid lines. Dashed lines represent traffic between
nonadjacent departments. The projected volumes arewritten above the appropriate lines.
. . . more
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
33/80
Slide 32 of 96
Operations Sequence Analysis
Departments (circles) are moved with the objective ofreducing the amount of nonadjacent flow.
This proceeds until no further improvement can be
found
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
34/80
Slide 33 of 96
Block Diagram Analysis
This approach follows the operations sequenceanalysis and is an effort to make the solution more
realistic
Each department is represented by a square the
relative size of the department
Shapes of the squares are altered to fit into the
boundaries of the building while retaining the same
areas and relative position found in the operationssequence analysis
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
35/80
Slide 34 of 96
Load-Distance Analysis
A way of quantitatively comparing alternativeprocess layouts
Inputs
Alternative block layouts which will provide the
distance between a department and each of the
other departments
For each product, the path it will follow (routing)
and its volume over some time period . . . more
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
36/80
Slide 35 of 96
Load-Distance Analysis
For each alternative process layout, compute the totaldistance a product must travel using its routing
Compute the total distance traveled per time unit for
each product by multiplying its total travel distance
by its volume per time unit
Add the total distance traveled per time unit for each
product
Select the layout with the smallest sum
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
37/80
Slide 36 of 96
Process Layout: Interdepartmental Flow
Given The flow (number of moves) to and from all
departments
The cost of moving from one department toanother
The existing or planned physical layout of theplant
Determine The best locations for each department, where
best means interdepartmental transportation, orflow, costs
Process Layout:
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
38/80
Slide 37 of 96
Process Layout:
Cut-And-Try Approach
Involves searching for departmental changes toreduce overall flow cost
Difficult to determine correct moves
Non-optimal and based on limited criteria (cost, flow
and distance)
Process Layout:
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
39/80
Slide 38 of 96
Process Layout:
Systematic Layout Planning
Numerical flow of items between departments Can be impractical to obtain
Does not account for the qualitative factors that
may be crucial to the placement decision
Systematic Layout Planning
Accounts for the importance of having each
department located next to every other department
Is also guided by trial and error
Switching departments then checking the results
of the closeness score
Example 1: Systematic Layout Planning
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
40/80
Slide 39 of 96
Example 1: Systematic Layout PlanningReasons for Closeness
Code
1
2
3
4
5
6
Reason
Type of customer
Ease of supervision
Common personnel
Contact necessary
Share same price
Psychology
Example 1: Systematic Layout Planning
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
41/80
Slide 40 of 96
Example 1: Systematic Layout PlanningImportance of Closeness
Value
A
E
I
O
U
X
ClosenessLine
code
Numerical
weights
Absolutely necessary
Especially important
Important
Ordinary closeness OK
Unimportant
Undesirable
16
8
4
2
0
80
Example 1: Systematic Layout Planning
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
42/80
Slide 41 of 96
Example 1: Systematic Layout PlanningRelating Reasons and Importance
From
1. Credit department
2. Toy department
3. Wine department
4. Camera department
5. Candy department
6
I
--
U
4
A
--
U
--
U
1
I
1,6
A
--
U
1
X
1
X
To2 3 4 5
Area(sq. ft.)
100
400
300
100
100
Letter
Number
Closeness rating
Reason for rating
Example 1: Systematic Layout Planning
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
43/80
Slide 42 of 96
Example 1: Systematic Layout PlanningThe Starting Solution
1
2
4
3
5
U U
E
A
I
Example 1: Systematic Layout Planning
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
44/80
Slide 43 of 96
Example 1: Systematic Layout PlanningInitial and Final Layouts
1
2 4
3
5
Initial Layout
Ignoring space and
building constraints
2
5 1 4
3
50 ft
20 ft
Final Layout
Adjusted by square
footage and building
size
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
45/80
Slide 44 of 96
Designing and Analyzing a Product Layout
Line Balancing
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
46/80
Slide 45 of 96
Designing and Analyzing a Product Layout
Characteristics Inputs
Design Procedure
How Good Is The Layout?
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
47/80
Slide 46 of 96
Product Layout-Advantages/Disadvantages
Advantages: Low cost variable cost per
unit
Lower material handling
costs reduction in work in-process
inventories
easier training and
supervision
Disadvantages: High volume required
because of large initial
investment
Work stoppage at any pointties up the whole process
Lack of flexibility in
handling variety of products
or production rates
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
48/80
Slide 47 of 96
Line Balancing Problem
Work stations are arranged so that the output of one is
an input to the next, i.e., a series connection
Layout design involves assigning one or more of the
tasks required to make a product to work stations
. . . more
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
49/80
Slide 48 of 96
Line Balancing Problem
The objective is to assign tasks to minimize theworkers idle time, therefore idle time costs, and meet
the required production rate for the line
In a perfectly balanced line, all workers would
complete their assigned tasks at the same time(assuming they start their work simultaneously)
This would result in no idle time
. . . more
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
50/80
Slide 49 of 96
Line Balancing Problem
Unfortunately there are a number of conditions thatprevent the achievement of a perfectly balanced line
The estimated times for tasks
The precedence relationships for the tasks
The combinatorial nature of the problem
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
51/80
Slide 50 of 96
Inputs
The production rate required from the product layoutor the cycle time.
The cycle time is the reciprocal of the production
rate and visa versa
All of the tasks required to make the product
It is assumed that these tasks can not be divided
further
. . . more
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
52/80
Slide 51 of 96
Inputs
The estimated time to do each task The precedence relationships between the tasks
These relationships are determined by the technical
constraints imposed by the product
These relationships are displayed as a network
known as a precedence diagram
D i P d
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
53/80
Slide 52 of 96
Design Procedure
1. If not provided, find the cycle time for the line.Remember the cycle time is the reciprocal of the
production rate. Make sure the cycle time is
expressed in the same time units as the estimated task
times.2. Select the line-balancing heuristic that may be used to
help with the assignments. (Two heuristics are
described at the end of this procedure.)
. . . more
D i P d
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
54/80
Slide 53 of 96
Design Procedure
3. Open a new work station with the full cycle timeremaining.
4. Determine which tasks are feasible, i.e., can be
assigned to this work station at this time. For a task
to be feasible, two conditions must be met:
All tasks that precede that task must have already
been assigned
The estimated task time must be less than or equalto the remaining cycle time for that work station.
D i P d
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
55/80
Slide 54 of 96
Design Procedure
5. If there are no feasible tasks, assignments to thatwork station are complete. Go back to step 3 (or stop,
if all tasks have been assigned).
If there is only one feasible task, assign it to the
work station. If there is more than one feasible task,use the heuristic (step 2) to determine which task to
assign. Reduce the work stations remaining cycle
time by the selected tasks time and return to step 4.
Li B l i H i ti
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
56/80
Slide 55 of 96
Line-Balancing Heuristics
Heuristic methods, based on simple rules, have beenused to develop very good, not optimal, solutions to
line balancing problems.
Incremental Utilization Heuristic - adds tasks to a
workstation one at a time in the order of taskprecedence until utilization is 100% or is observed to
fall.
Longest-Task-Time Heuristic - adds tasks to a
workstation one at a time in the order of task
precedence, choosing - when a choice must be made -
the task with the longest time.
H G d I th D i ?
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
57/80
Slide 56 of 96
How Good Is the Design?
Utilization is one way of objectively determining hownear perfectly balanced an assignment scheme is.
Utilization is the percentage of time that a production
line is working.
Utilization is calculated as:
or
100stations)workofnumber(ActualTime)(Cycle
stask timeallofSumx
x
100onsworkstatiofnumberActual
onsworkstatiofnumberMinimumx
P d t L t M j A ti
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
58/80
Slide 57 of 96
Product Layouts-Major Assumptions
Volume is adequate for high equipment utilization. Product demand is stable enough to justify high
investment in specialized equipment.
Product is standardized or approaching a phase ofits life cycle that justifies investment in specialized
equipment.
Supplies of raw material and components are
adequate and of uniform quality to ensure they will
work with the specialized equipment.
Why is Balancing the Line Important?
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
59/80
Slide 58 of 96
Station 1
Min/
Unit 6
Station 2
7
Station 3
3
Why is Balancing the Line Important?
Whats Going to Happen?
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
60/80
Slide 59 of 96
Example 1: The ALB Problem
Youve just been assigned the job a setting up anelectric fan assembly line with the following tasks:
Task Time (Mins) Description Predecessors
A 2 Assemble frame NoneB 1 Mount switch A
C 3.25 Assemble motor housing None
D 1.2 Mount motor housing in frame A, C
E 0.5 Attach blade D
F 1 Assemble and attach safety grill EG 1 Attach cord B
H 1.4 Test F, G
Example 1: The ALB Problem
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
61/80
Slide 60 of 96
pThe Precedence Diagram
A
C
B
D E F
GH
2
3.25
1
1.2 .5
1
1.4
1
Which process step defines the maximum rate ofproduction?
Example 1: The ALB Problem
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
62/80
Slide 62 of 96
We want to assemble 100 fans per day
Required Cycle Time, C =Production time per period
Required output per period
C =420 mins / day
100 units / day= 4.2 mins / unit
What do these numbers this represent?
Example 1: The ALB Problem
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
63/80
Slide 63 of 96
We want to assemble 100 fans per day
Theoretical Min. Number of Workstations,N
N =Sum of task times (T)
Cycle time (C)
t
t
N =11.35 mins / unit
4.2 mins / unit= 2.702, or 3t
Why should we always round up?
Example 1: The ALB Problem
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
64/80
Slide 64 of 96
pSelected Task Selection Rules
Primary: Assign tasks in order the the largest numberof following tasks.
Secondary (tie-breaking): Assign tasks in order of thelongest operating time
Example 1: The ALB Problem
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
65/80
Slide 65 of 96
pSelected Task Selection Rules
Precedence Diagram
A
C
B
D E F
GH
2
3.25
1
1.2 .5
11.4
1
Task Followers Time (Min)
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
66/80
A
C
B
D E F
GH
2
3.25
1
1.2 .5
11.4
1
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3
A 6 2
C 4 3.25
D 3 1.2
B 2 1
E 2 0.5F 1 1
G 1 1
H 0 1.4
Slide 66 of 96
Task Followers Time (Min)
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
67/80
A
C
B
D E F
GH
2
3.25
1
1.2 .5
11.4
1
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3
A 6 2
C 4 3.25
D 3 1.2
B 2 1
E 2 0.5F 1 1
G 1 1
H 0 1.4
A (4.2-2=2.2)
Slide 67 of 96
Task Followers Time (Min)
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
68/80
A
C
B
D E F
GH
2
3.25
1
1.2 .5
11.4
1
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3
A 6 2
C 4 3.25
D 3 1.2
B 2 1
E 2 0.5F 1 1
G 1 1
H 0 1.4
A (4.2-2=2.2)
B (2.2-1=1.2)
Slide 68 of 96
Task Followers Time (Min)
A 6
2
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
69/80
A
C
B
D E F
GH
2
3.25
1
1.2 .5
11.4
1
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3
A 6 2
C 4 3.25
D 3 1.2
B 2 1
E 2 0.5F 1 1
G 1 1
H 0 1.4
A (4.2-2=2.2)
B (2.2-1=1.2)
G (1.2-1= .2)
Idle= .2
Slide 69 of 96
Task Followers Time (Min)
A 6
2
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
70/80
A
C
B
D E F
GH
2
3.25
1
1.2 .5
11.4
1
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3
A 6 2
C 4 3.25
D 3 1.2
B 2 1
E 2 0.5F 1 1
G 1 1
H 0 1.4
A (4.2-2=2.2)
B (2.2-1=1.2)
G (1.2-1= .2)
Idle= .2
C (4.2-3.25)=.95
Idle = .95
Slide 70 of 96
Task Followers Time (Min)
A 6
2
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
71/80
A
C
B
D E F
GH
2
3.25
1
1.2 .5
11.4
1
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3
A 6 2
C 4 3.25
D 3 1.2
B 2 1
E 2 0.5F 1 1
G 1 1
H 0 1.4
A (4.2-2=2.2)
B (2.2-1=1.2)
G (1.2-1= .2)
Idle= .2
C (4.2-3.25)=.95
Idle = .95
D (4.2-1.2)=3
Slide 71 of 96
Task Followers Time (Min)
A 6
2
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
72/80
A
C
B
D E F
GH
2
3.25
1
1.2 .5
11.4
1
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3
A 6 2
C 4 3.25
D 3 1.2
B 2 1
E 2 0.5F 1 1
G 1 1
H 0 1.4
A (4.2-2=2.2)
B (2.2-1=1.2)
G (1.2-1= .2)
Idle= .2
C (4.2-3.25)=.95
Idle = .95
D (4.2-1.2)=3
E (3-.5)=2.5
Slide 72 of 96
Task Followers Time (Min)
A 6
2
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
73/80
A
C
B
D E F
GH
2
3.25
1
1.2 .5
11.4
1
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3
A 6 2
C 4 3.25
D 3 1.2
B 2 1
E 2 0.5F 1 1
G 1 1
H 0 1.4
A (4.2-2=2.2)
B (2.2-1=1.2)
G (1.2-1= .2)
Idle= .2
C (4.2-3.25)=.95
Idle = .95
D (4.2-1.2)=3
E (3-.5)=2.5
F (2.5-1)=1.5
Slide 73 of 96
Task Followers Time (Min)
A 6
2
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
74/80
A
C
B
D E F
GH
2
3.25
1
1.2 .5
11.4
1
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3
A 6 2
C 4 3.25
D 3 1.2
B 2 1
E 2 0.5F 1 1
G 1 1
H 0 1.4
A (4.2-2=2.2)
B (2.2-1=1.2)
G (1.2-1= .2)
C (4.2-3.25)=.95 D (4.2-1.2)=3
E (3-.5)=2.5
F (2.5-1)=1.5H (1.5-1.4)=.1
Idle=.2 Idle=.95 Idle=.1
Slide 74 of 96
Example 1: The ALB Problem
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
75/80
Slide 75 of 96
Example 1: The ALB Problem
Which station is the bottleneck? What is the effective cycle time?
Efficiency =Sum of task times (T)
Actual number of workstations (Na) x Cycle time (C)
Efficiency = 11.35 mins / unit(3)(4.2mins / unit)
=.901
Designing and Analyzing a Cellular Layout
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
76/80
Slide 76 of 96
Designing and Analyzing a Cellular Layout
Fundamental questions: Which parts are going to be produced in a cell?
Which processes are going to be assigned to a cell?
Group Technology
B fit
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
77/80
Slide 77 of 96
Benefits
1. Better human relations
2. Improved operator expertise
3. Less in-process inventory and material handling
4. Faster production setup
Fundamental Requirements
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
78/80
Slide 78 of 96
for Parts to be Made in Cells
Demand for the parts must be high enough and stableenough that moderate batch sizes of the parts can be
produced periodically.
Parts must be capable of being grouped into parts
families.
Design Procedure
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
79/80
Slide 79 of 96
Design Procedure
1. Form the Parts-Machines Matrix.
2. Rearrange the Rows.
Place the machines that produce the same parts in
adjacent rows.
3. Rearrange the Columns.
Place the parts requiring the same machines in
adjacent columns.
4. Using the rearranged parts-machines matrix toidentify cells, the machines for that cell and the parts
that will be produced in that cell.
Wrap-Up: World-Class Practice
-
7/29/2019 Facility [Mfrg.
80/80
Wrap Up: World Class Practice
Strive for flexibility in layouts
Multi-job training of workers
Sophisticated preventive-maintenance programs
Flexible machines
Empowered workers trained in problem solving
Layouts small and compact