DRAFT 2014 PROPOS IT ION K

5 -YEAR PR IOR IT IZAT ION PROGRAM

FACILITIES - BART

Approved: [DATE]

Prepared for the San Francisco County Transportation Authority

By Bay Area Rapid Transit Distr ict

Item 8 Enclosure D Plans and Programs Committee June 17, 2014

1

DRAFT 2014 PROP K 5-YEAR PR IORIT IZATION PROGRAM FACIL IT IES

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Table of Contents

Eligibility

Prioritization Criteria

Stretching Your Prop K Sales Tax Dollars Farther

Table 2 - Project Delivery Snapshot

Table 3 - Prioritization Criteria and Scoring Table

Table 4 – Prop K 5-Year Project List (FY 2014/15 – FY 2018/19)

Project Information Forms

2009 Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program – Program of Projects (as adopted)

2009 Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program – Program of Projects (as amended)

Eligibility

Eligibility as identified in the voter approved Prop K Expenditure Plan is as follows:

“Programmatic improvements for upgrade, rehabilitation and replacement of transit facilities and facilities-related equipment. Includes limited incremental operating funds for MUNI Metro Extension/MUNI Metro Turnback operations. The first $101.9M is Priority 1 and the remainder is Priority 2. Projects include:

Rehabilitation, upgrades and/or replacement of existing facilities for maintenance and operations, including equipment (Priority 1). Rehabilitation, upgrades and renovation for rail stations including platform edge tiles, elevators, escalators, and faregates (Priority 1). Rehabilitation and/or replacement of facilities for administration (Priority 2). The first $84.7 M in Prop K is Priority 1 and the remainder is Priority 2. Includes project development and capital costs. Sponsoring Agencies: MUNI, BART, Caltrain (PCJPB). Total Funding: $925.7M; Prop K: $95.7M. Of the $115.7M in Prop K funds, the following minimum amounts will be available for MUNI ($92.6M), BART ($2.3M), and PCJPB ($9.3M).”

Prioritization Criteria

One of the key required elements of the 5YPPs is a transparent process for how projects get selected. Prop K requires at a minimum that each category include prioritization criteria that address project readiness, community support, and relative level of need or urgency. For this 5YPP update, the Citizens Advisory Committee requested that the Transportation Authority and project sponsors develop a user-friendly, transparent scoring table that could apply to all 5YPPs, and that the scoring prioritize safety and community input highly.

Table 3 shows the new Prioritization Criteria and Scoring Table. Each project can receive a maximum of 20 points, with 10 points allocated programwide criteria and 10 points allocated for category specific criteria.

2

DRAFT 2014 PROP K 5-YEAR PR IORIT IZATION PROGRAM FACIL IT IES

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

The Expenditure Plan also requires consideration of geographic equity in terms of project distribution that takes into account the various needs of San Francisco’s neighborhoods. The geographic area where the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) may propose Prop K capital projects is limited to the areas on or around its fixed guideways system, which runs along Market Street from The Embarcadero to Civic Center and then down the Mission Street corridor to Balboa Park BART Station, the southern-most San Francisco Station. Though BART receives a small amount of Prop K funds from this category (e.g. this category is proposed to fund only 2 projects during the 2014 5YPP), BART takes into account San Francisco and geographic equity within its larger program of projects, which includes all fund sources and not just Prop K.

Stretching Your Prop K Sales Tax Dollars Farther

Leveraging Prop K funds against non-Prop K fund sources (e.g., federal, state, other local funds) is necessary to fully fund the Expenditure Plan projects and programs. For the BART facilities category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax revenue spent, it would be leveraged by about $9 in non-Prop K funds. The table below compares Prop K Expenditure Plan assumptions with proposed leveraging in the 2014 5-year project lists.

Table 1. Prop K Leveraging1

Category Expected Leveraging (Non-Prop K Funds)

Proposed Leveraging (Non-Prop K Funds)

Rehabilitate/Upgrade Existing Facilities 90% 97% 1 This table compares the expected leveraging assumed in the Expenditure Plan with the proposed leveraging assumed in the 5-Year

Project List.

3

Tab

le 2

. Pro

ject

Del

iver

y Sn

apsh

otF

acili

ties

--

BA

RT

Tab

le 2

a. P

rop

K F

un

ds

Allo

cate

d

5-Y

ear

Pri

orit

izat

ion

Pro

gram

(5Y

PP

) P

erio

d

Pro

gram

med

(A

vaila

ble

for

A

lloca

tion

)T

otal

Allo

cate

d a

s of

3/

31/

2014

% A

lloca

ted

2005

5Y

PP

(F

Y 2

004/

05-2

008/

09)

*$1

,010

,000

$383

,615

38%

2009

5Y

PP

: (F

Y 2

009/

10 -

2013

/14

) *

$512

,000

$00%

Tot

al *

$383

,615

Tab

les

show

allo

catio

ns a

nd p

erce

nt c

ompl

ete

thro

ugh

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

014,

bas

ed o

n pr

ojec

t spo

nsor

s' pr

ogre

ss r

epor

ts.

Com

ple

ted

Pro

ject

s/P

roje

ct P

has

es (s

orte

d by

allo

catio

n ye

ar, t

hen

spon

sor,

then

pro

ject

nam

e)

Spon

sor

Fis

cal Y

ear

of

Allo

cati

onP

roje

ct N

ame

Ph

ase(

s) F

un

ded

Tot

al A

lloca

ted

as

of 3

/31

/20

14%

Com

ple

te

as

of

3/31

/20

14B

AR

T20

05/0

6T

VM

Exp

ansi

on &

Air

Com

pres

sor

Rep

lace

men

tC

onst

ruct

ion

236,

864

$

100%

BA

RT

2005

/06

Rep

lace

men

t of

Pla

tfor

m E

dge

Tile

s, S

tair

Tre

ads

Con

stru

ctio

n14

6,75

1$

10

0%SP

AC

E

Pro

ject

s/P

roje

ct P

has

es U

nd

erw

ay (s

orte

d by

allo

catio

n ye

ar, t

hen

spon

sor,

then

pro

ject

nam

e)

Spon

sor

Fis

cal Y

ear

of

Allo

cati

onP

roje

ct N

ame

Ph

ase(

s) F

un

ded

Tot

al A

lloca

ted

as

of 3

/31

/20

14%

Com

ple

te

as

of

3/31

/20

14

Tab

le 2

b. P

erce

nt

Com

ple

te

* F

unds

pro

gram

med

in th

e 20

09 5

YP

P m

ay in

clud

e pr

ogra

mm

ed b

ut u

nallo

cate

d fu

nds

from

the

2005

5Y

PP

, as

wel

l as

de-

oblig

ated

fun

ds.

For

mor

e in

form

atio

n on

Pro

p K

and

oth

er T

rans

port

atio

n A

utho

rity

fun

ded

proj

ects

, vis

it ht

tp:/

/ww

w.s

fcta

.org

/mys

tree

tsf-

proj

ects

-map

to a

cces

s an

in

tera

ctiv

e m

ap s

how

ing

proj

ects

in y

our

neig

hbor

hood

and

city

wid

e.

P:\P

rop

K\S

P-5

YPP\

20

13

Up

dat

e\3

5YP

Ps\P

roje

ct D

eliv

ery\

Cha

pter

3 P

roje

ct D

eliv

ery.

xlsx

; EP

20

Page

1 o

f 1

4

Tab

le 3

- D

raft

Prio

ritiz

atio

n C

riter

ia a

nd S

corin

g T

able

Faci

litie

s - B

ART

(EP2

0B)

Proj

ect R

eadi

ness

Tim

e Se

nsiti

ve

Urg

ency

Com

mun

ity S

uppo

rtSa

fety

Leve

ragi

ngIm

prov

es E

ffici

ency

of T

rans

it O

pera

tions

Tot

al

Tota

l Pos

sible

Sco

re4

33

43

320

Daly

City

BA

RT S

tatio

n Bu

s & S

huttl

e Ci

rcul

atio

n Im

prov

emen

ts4

13

32

316

Glen

Par

k St

atio

n Pl

aza

Impr

ovem

ents

31

32

22

13

Prio

ritiz

atio

n C

riter

ia D

efin

ition

s:Pr

ojec

t Rea

dine

ss: P

rojec

t lik

ely to

nee

d fu

ndin

g in

fisc

al ye

ar p

ropo

sed.

Fac

tors

to b

e co

nsid

ered

inclu

de a

dequ

acy

of sc

ope,

sche

dule,

bud

get a

nd fu

ndin

g pl

an re

lativ

e to

cur

rent

pro

ject s

tatu

s (e.g

. exp

ect m

ore

deta

il an

d ce

rtain

ty fo

r a p

rojec

t abo

ut to

ent

er c

onst

ruct

ion

than

des

ign)

; whe

ther

prio

r pro

ject p

hase

s are

com

plet

ed o

r exp

ecte

d to

be

com

plet

ed b

efor

e be

ginn

ing

the

next

pha

se; a

nd w

heth

er li

tigat

ion,

com

mun

ity

oppo

sitio

n or

oth

er fa

ctor

s may

sign

ifica

ntly

delay

pro

ject.

Com

mun

ity S

uppo

rt: P

rojec

t has

clea

r and

div

erse

com

mun

ity su

ppor

t and

/or w

as it

iden

tified

thro

ugh

a co

mm

unity

-bas

ed p

lanni

ng p

roce

ss. A

n ex

ampl

e of

a c

omm

unity

-bas

ed p

lan is

a n

eighb

orho

od tr

ansp

orta

tion

plan

, but

not

a c

ount

ywid

e pl

an o

r age

ncy

capi

tal i

mpr

ovem

ent p

rogr

am.

Thre

e po

ints

for a

pro

ject i

n an

ado

pted

com

mun

ity b

ased

plan

with

evi

denc

e of

div

erse

com

mun

ity su

ppor

t.Tw

o po

ints

for a

pro

ject w

ith e

vide

nce

of su

ppor

t fro

m b

oth

neig

hbor

hood

stak

ehol

ders

and

gro

ups a

nd c

ityw

ide

grou

ps.

One

poi

nt fo

r a p

rojec

t with

evi

denc

e of

supp

ort f

rom

eith

er n

eighb

orho

od st

akeh

olde

rs a

nd g

roup

s or c

ityw

ide

grou

ps.

Tim

e Se

nsiti

ve U

rgen

cy: P

rojec

t nee

ds to

pro

ceed

in p

ropo

sed

timef

ram

e to

ena

ble

cons

truct

ion

coor

dina

tion

with

ano

ther

pro

ject (

e.g.,

min

imiz

e co

sts a

nd c

onst

ruct

ion

impa

cts)

; to

supp

ort a

noth

er fu

nded

or

prop

osed

pro

ject (

e.g. n

ew si

gnal

cont

rolle

rs n

eed

to b

e in

stall

ed to

supp

ort T

EP

impl

emen

tatio

n); o

r to

mee

t tim

ely u

se o

f fun

ds d

eadl

ines

ass

ociat

ed w

ith m

atch

ing

fund

s.

PRO

P K

PR

OG

RAM

-WID

E C

RIT

ER

IAC

ATE

GO

RY

SPE

CIF

IC C

RIT

ER

IA

Impr

oves

Effi

cien

cy o

f Tra

nsit

Ope

ratio

ns: P

rojec

t dire

ctly

cont

ribut

es to

impr

oved

effi

cienc

y (e

.g.,

level

boar

ding

, add

ition

al fa

re g

ates

)

Safe

ty: P

rojec

t im

prov

es sa

fety

for p

asse

nger

s, op

erat

ors a

nd/o

r em

ploy

ees.

Proj

ects

that

add

ress

a d

ocum

ente

d sa

fety

issu

e sh

ould

scor

e m

ore

high

ly.Le

vera

ging

: Pro

ject l

ever

ages

non

-Pro

p K

fund

s.

5

2014

/15

2015

/16

2016

/17

2017

/18

2018

/19

BART

Daly

City

BA

RT S

tatio

n Bu

s &

Shut

tle C

ircul

atio

n Im

prov

emen

tsPS

&E

Pl

anne

d$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00

BART

Daly

City

BA

RT S

tatio

n Bu

s &

Shut

tle C

ircul

atio

n Im

prov

emen

tsCO

N

Plan

ned

$400

,000

$400

,000

BART

Glen

Par

k St

atio

n Pl

aza

Impr

ovem

ents

PLA

N/C

ER

Plan

ned

$75,

249

$75,

249

$225

,249

$4

00,0

00

$0

$0

$0

$625

,249

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

($

225,

249)

($62

5,24

9)($

625,

249)

($62

5,24

9)($

625,

249)

($62

5,24

9)

Tab

le 4

- D

raft

Prop

K 5

-Yea

r Pro

ject

Lis

t (FY

201

4/15

- FY

201

8/19

)

Reh

ab/U

pgra

de E

xist

ing

Faci

litie

s - B

ART

(EP

20B

)

Prog

ram

min

g

Age

ncy

Proj

ect N

ame

Phas

eSt

atus

Fisc

al Y

ear

Tota

l

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

5YP

PT

otal

Pro

gram

med

in 2

013

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an B

asel

ine

Cum

ulat

ive

Rem

aini

ng P

rogr

amm

ing

Cap

acity

6

2014

/15

2015

/16

2016

/17

2017

/18

2018

/19

Daly

City

BA

RT S

tatio

n Bu

s & S

huttl

e Ci

rcul

atio

n Im

prov

emen

tsPS

&E

$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00

Daly

City

BA

RT S

tatio

n Bu

s & S

huttl

e Ci

rcul

atio

n Im

prov

emen

tsCO

N

$100

,000

$300

,000

$400

,000

Glen

Par

k St

atio

n Pl

aza

Impr

ovem

ents

PLA

N/C

ER

$75,

249

$75,

249

$225

,249

$1

00,0

00

$300

,000

$0

$0

$6

25,2

49

$60,

000

$60,

000

$0

$0

$0

$120

,000

($

165,

249)

($20

5,24

9)($

505,

249)

($50

5,24

9)($

505,

249)

($50

5,24

9)

Tab

le 4

- D

raft

Prop

K 5

-Yea

r Pro

ject

Lis

t (FY

201

4/15

- FY

201

8/19

)

Reh

ab/U

pgra

de E

xist

ing

Faci

litie

s - B

ART

(EP

20B

)

Cas

h Fl

ow ($

) Max

imum

Ann

ual R

eim

burs

emen

t

Proj

ect N

ame

Phas

eFi

scal

Yea

rTo

tal

Cas

h Fl

ow P

rogr

amm

ed in

5YP

PC

ash

Flow

Pro

gram

med

in 2

013

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an B

asel

ine

Cum

ulat

ive

Rem

aini

ng C

ash

Flow

Cap

acity

7

8

San

Fran

cisc

o C

ount

y T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

Prop

ositi

on K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am

Proj

ect I

nfor

mat

ion

Form

Proj

ect N

ame:

Proj

ect C

ost E

stim

ate

Phas

eC

ost

Prop

KO

ther

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

g-

$

-

$

-$

E

nviro

nmen

tal S

tudi

es (P

A&

ED

)-

$

-

$

-$

D

esig

n E

ngin

eerin

g (P

S&E

)40

0,00

0$

150,

000

$

250,

000

$

R/W

-$

-$

-

$

Cons

truct

ion

1,00

0,00

0$

40

0,00

0$

60

0,00

0$

Pr

ocur

emen

t (e.g

. rol

ling

stoc

k)-

$

-

$

-$

T

otal

Pro

ject

Cos

t1,

400,

000

$

550,

000

$

850,

000

$

Perc

ent o

f Tot

al39

%61

%

Phas

eFu

nd S

ourc

eFu

nd S

ourc

e St

atus

Fisc

al Y

ear

Fund

s Ava

ilabl

e14

/15

15/1

616

/17

17/1

818

/19

Tot

al

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Prop

KPl

anne

d14

/15

150,

000

$

150,

000

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Prop

1B

(BA

RT)

Allo

cate

d13

/14

250,

000

$

250,

000

$

Cons

truct

ion

STIP

(San

Mat

eo)

Prog

ram

med

16/1

720

0,00

0$

20

0,00

0$

Co

nstru

ctio

nPr

op K

Plan

ned

100,

000

$

300,

000

$

400,

000

$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

Tot

al B

y Fi

scal

Yea

r40

0,00

0$

10

0,00

0$

50

0,00

0$

-

$

-$

1,0

00,0

00$

Com

men

ts/C

once

rns

TA N

ote:

The

Prop

K E

xpen

ditu

re P

lan a

llow

s inv

estm

ent o

f sale

s tax

fund

s out

side

of th

e co

unty

lim

its if

cer

tain

con

ditio

ns a

re e

stab

lishe

d. T

hese

con

ditio

ns a

re

desc

ribe

in th

e E

xpen

ditu

re P

lan a

nd in

clude

the

need

for p

lanni

ng/a

nalys

is to

dem

onst

rate

that

the

prop

osed

impr

ovem

ents

wou

ld re

sult

in a

qua

ntifi

able

bene

fit

to th

e Ci

ty a

nd C

ount

y of

San

Fra

ncisc

o's t

rans

porta

tion

impr

ovem

ent p

rogr

am a

nd th

at th

e pr

opos

ed e

xpen

se is

mat

ched

by

the

coun

ty in

whi

ch th

e sa

les ta

x fu

nds w

ould

be

inve

sted

. Th

ese

cond

ition

s wou

ld n

eed

to b

e sa

tisfie

d pr

ior t

o re

ceiv

ing

a po

sitiv

e st

aff r

ecom

men

datio

n fo

r allo

catio

n of

the

prop

osed

fund

s.

Daly

City

BA

RT S

tatio

n Bu

s & S

huttl

e Ci

rcul

atio

n Im

prov

emen

ts

Fund

ing

Sour

ce

Proj

ect E

xpen

ditu

res (

Cas

h Fl

ow) B

y Fi

scal

Yea

r E

nter

Cas

h Fl

ow H

ere

9

10

San

Fran

cisc

o C

ount

y T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

Prop

ositi

on K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am

Proj

ect I

nfor

mat

ion

Form

Proj

ect N

ame:

Proj

ect C

ost E

stim

ate

Phas

eC

ost

Prop

KO

ther

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

g-

$

-$

-

$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

375,

249

$

75,2

49$

300,

000

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

400,

000

$

-$

40

0,00

0$

R/

W-

$

-$

-

$

Cons

truct

ion

5,00

0,00

0$

-

$

5,00

0,00

0$

Pr

ocur

emen

t (e.g

. rol

ling

stoc

k)-

$

-$

-

$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

5,77

5,24

9$

75

,249

$

5,

700,

000

$

Perc

ent o

f Tot

al1%

99%

Phas

eFu

nd S

ourc

eFu

nd S

ourc

e St

atus

Fisc

al Y

ear

Fund

s Ava

ilabl

e14

/15

15/1

616

/17

17/1

818

/19

Tot

al

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

gPr

op K

Plan

ned

14/1

575

,249

$

75

,249

$

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

gPr

op 1

BA

lloca

ted

13/1

430

0,00

0$

30

0,00

0$

D

esig

n E

ngin

eerin

g (P

S&E

)Pr

op 1

BA

lloca

ted

16/1

740

0,00

0$

40

0,00

0$

Co

nstru

ctio

nO

BAG

Plan

ned

16/1

7-

$

5,00

0,00

0$

5,

000,

000

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

T

otal

By

Fisc

al Y

ear

375,

249

$

400,

000

$

5,00

0,00

0$

-$

-

$

5,77

5,24

9$

Com

men

ts/C

once

rns

TA N

ote:

Proj

ect d

oes n

ot a

ppea

r to

be st

rong

ly co

mpe

titiv

e fo

r One

BayA

rea

Gra

nt (O

BAG

) fun

ds.

Dem

onst

ratio

n of

alte

rnat

e po

tent

ial fu

nd so

urce

s for

co

nstru

ctio

n w

ill b

e ne

cess

ary

in o

rder

to su

ppor

t a fa

vora

ble

staf

f rec

omm

enda

tion

at th

e tim

e th

e pl

anni

ng fu

nds a

re re

ques

ted.

Glen

Par

k St

atio

n Pl

aza

Impr

ovem

ents

Fund

ing

Sour

ce

Proj

ect E

xpen

ditu

res (

Cas

h Fl

ow) B

y Fi

scal

Yea

r E

nter

Cas

h Fl

ow H

ere

11

2009

/10

2010

/11

2011

/12

2012

/13

2013

/14

BA

RT

BA

RT

Sta

tions

Mod

erni

zatio

n P

rogr

amP

S&E

, C

ON

Pro

gram

med

$272

,000

$272

,000

BA

RT

Dow

ntow

n B

AR

T S

tatio

n C

anop

ies

(Em

barc

ader

o to

Civ

ic C

ente

r)P

S&E

, C

ON

Pro

gram

med

$240

,000

$240

,000

$272

,000

$0

$0

$0

$2

40,0

00

$512

,000

$2

72,0

00

$0

$0

$0

$240

,000

$5

12,0

00

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

* T

he 2

009

Stra

tegi

c P

lan

was

ado

pted

on

July

28,

200

9 th

roug

h R

es. 1

0-07

.

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

200

9 St

rate

gic

Pla

n*

Cu

mu

lati

ve R

emai

nin

g P

rogr

amm

ing

Cap

acit

y

Fis

cal Y

ear

Tot

al

Subc

ateg

ory

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

5Y

PP

2009

Pro

p K

5Y

PP

- P

rogr

am o

f P

roje

cts

(as

app

rove

d)

Fac

iliti

es -

BA

RT

(E

P 2

0B)

Pro

gram

min

g

Age

ncy

Pro

ject

Nam

eP

hase

Stat

us

12

2009

/10

2010

/11

2011

/12

2012

/13

2013

/14

BA

RT

BA

RT

Sta

tions

Mod

erni

zatio

n P

rogr

amPS

&E

, C

ON

Pro

gram

med

$272

,000

$272

,000

BA

RT

Dow

ntow

n B

AR

T S

tatio

n C

anop

ies

(Em

barc

ader

o to

Civ

ic C

ente

r)PS

&E

, C

ON

Pro

gram

med

$240

,000

$240

,000

$272

,000

$0

$0

$0

$2

40,0

00

$512

,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$272

,000

$0

$0

$0

$2

40,0

00

$512

,000

$272

,000

$0

$0

$0

$2

40,0

00

$512

,000

$1

13,2

49

$113

,249

$1

13,2

49

$113

,249

$1

13,2

49

$113

,249

$1

13,2

49

$113

,249

* T

he 2

009

Stra

tegi

c P

lan

was

ado

pted

on

July

28,

200

9 th

roug

h R

es. 1

0-07

.

2009

Pro

p K

5Y

PP

- P

rogr

am o

f P

roje

cts

(as

amen

ded

)

Reh

ab/

Up

grad

e E

xist

ing

Fac

iliti

es -

BA

RT

(E

P 2

0B)

Pro

gram

min

g an

d A

lloca

tion

s T

o-d

ate

Las

t Upd

ate:

Feb

ruar

y 14

, 201

3

Age

ncy

Pro

ject

Nam

eP

hase

Stat

usF

isca

l Yea

rT

otal

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

5Y

PP

Tot

al A

lloca

ted

an

d P

end

ing

in 5

YP

PT

otal

Deo

bli

gate

d in

5Y

PP

Tot

al U

nal

loca

ted

in 5

YP

P

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

Am

end

ed 2

009

Stra

tegi

c P

lan

*

Prog

ram

med

Deo

blig

ated

fro

m P

rior

5Y

PP

Cyc

les

**C

um

ula

tive

Rem

ain

ing

Pro

gram

min

g C

apac

ity

** "

Deo

blig

ated

fro

m p

rior

5YP

P c

ycle

s" in

clud

es d

eobl

igat

ions

fro

m a

lloca

tions

app

rove

d pr

ior

to th

e cu

rren

t 5Y

PP

per

iod,

exc

ludi

ng d

eobl

igat

ions

inco

rpor

ated

in

the

first

200

9 St

rate

gic

Pla

n am

endm

ent,

as o

f D

ecem

ber

31, 2

012.

Pen

ding

Allo

catio

n/A

ppro

pria

tion

Boa

rd A

ppro

ved

Allo

catio

n/A

ppro

pria

tion

P:\P

rop

K\SP

-5YP

P\20

09 L

ivin

g\5Y

PP A

men

ded\

EP 2

0B.x

lsx

Tab

: EP

20B

5YPP

02.

14.1

3Pa

ge 1

of 113