fabrication and testing of a strain-based carbon nanotube magnetometer structure
DESCRIPTION
Fabrication and Testing of a Strain-Based Carbon Nanotube Magnetometer Structure. Jon A. Brame, Johnathan Goodsell, Stephanie A. Getty ¹ , Y. Zheng ¹ And David A. Allred Brigham Young University ¹ NASA GSFC Code 541 Began as an NASA ESMD Student-Faculty Program. Overview. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
Fabrication and Testing of a Strain-Based Carbon
Nanotube Magnetometer Structure
Jon A. Brame, Johnathan Goodsell, Stephanie A. Getty¹, Y. Zheng¹
And David A. Allred Brigham Young University
¹NASA GSFC Code 541Began as an NASA ESMD Student-Faculty Program
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
Overview
1. Project Motivation and Goal2. Fabrication Process 3. Outcomes
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
CNT Properties• Change in Conductivity with Strain
– Tombler, et al(Nature, 2000)
– Single tube
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
CNT Properties• Change in Conductivity with Strain
– Tombler, et al(Nature, 2000)
– Single tube
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
Motivation
• Space Magnetometry– Spacecraft Orientation– Magnetic Field Studies
• Planetary Exploration– Astronaut/Rover
Orientation– Planetary Geology
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
Device Operation
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
GoldSi02
Si
Needle
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
Prototype
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
Process: Catalyst
• Indirect Iron Catalyst Deposition
Vacuum Chamber for Thin Film Deposition
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
Process: SWCNT Growth
• Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) SWCNT Growth
CVD Growth Furnace
Diagram of CVD Growth Process
SEM Image of SWCNT Mat
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
Process – Electrical Contact• Gold Contact Pads
– Detector Development Lab (DDL)– E-Beam Lithography– Deposition: Chrome(100Å)-
Gold(1000Å)– Lift-off
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
Process – Iron Needle• Iron Needle
– Device Alignment– E-Beam Lithography pattern– Deposition: Chrome-Iron-
Chrome– Lift-off
Diagram of SWCNT network, contact pads and iron needle
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
Process – Trench• Lithography
(manual)• Etching
– Buffered Oxide Etch
– KOHDiagram of completed device
Au
Au
SWCNTs
Remnantneedle
Trench
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
Results
• Completed Magnetometer Prototype
Successfully etched trench with SWCNT spanning gap between gold electrodes
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
Results
• Magnetic Field Measurement Testing
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
Micrograph of Test Structure
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
Gold pad
SWCNT mat
Iron needle
Trench
alignment mark
“Rolled-up” SWCNT mat
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
5400
5450
5500
5550
5600
5650
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Time in seconds (Magnet Current Ramping Up)
Dev
ice
Cur
rent
(nA
)
a b
c
Device resistance decreases as magnetic field is increased,
• At some point contact with one of the pads becomes intermittent leading to the noisy signal during time period c
500 seconds into the experiment the field is ramped down (b)Experimental Results
Note: Behavior during a & b are the opposite of what was expected to happen.
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
CONCLUSIONS 1. A fabrication process for magnetometer test
structures has been demonstrated. 2. An array of prototype magnetometer test structures
has been successfully fabricated. 3. The test structures consist of a high aspect-ratio
iron needle suspended above a trench by a mat of SWCNT. Gold pads electrically contact the SWCNT mat. This fabrication process is now available and being used in various field sensing applications.
4. Initial magnetic testing indicates that there is some correlation between magnetic field and measured resistance in the device.
5. Further device fabrication and testing is necessary to establish the extent of this relationship.
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
The design for the next iteration of gold-pad geometry features three separate sets of pads (labeled a, b & c) to contact specific sections of nanotubes. In this figure the black Xs represents the nanotube mat and the horizontal line is the needle.
Dividing the pads into three sets makes it possible to uses the outer set of pads (labeled a & c) to measure the strain across the outer portions of the nanotubes.
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
AcknowledgementsBryan Hicks, Rachel Bis, Melissa Harrison
• Branch 541: Dewey Dove, D. Stewart Bruno Munoz, Carl Taylor, Len Wang, D. Rowland
• BYU: Prof. Richard Vanfleet, Dr. Jeffrey Farrer, Prof. Robert Davis, David Hutchinson
• Other: Lynda Goodsell, Bill Heaps• Division 540; Dick Fahey; Joshua
Halpern; ESMD; Rocky Mountain Space Grant Consortium
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from NASA GSFC Director’s Discretionary Fund, the NASA Internal Research and Development Fund , the Rocky Mountain Space Grant Consortium , and the Student/Faculty Internship Program for the summers of 2006 and 2007 which provided support for J. A. Brame, J. E. Goodsell, & D. D. Allred
2 August 2007 Jon Brame
Outcome: BYU Collaboration