experimental and theoretical study of energy deposition and residual activation induced by uranium...
TRANSCRIPT
Experimental and Theoretical Study of Energy Deposition and Residual Activation Induced by
Uranium Ions to Model the Beam Loss Hazards in the GSI Future
Facility
GSI-INTAS ProjectReference Number 03-54-3588
May 2004 ndash April 2006Budget 90 keuro
Motivation
Intensities up to 1012 of U ions and 251013 of protons are foreseen in the FAIR accelerators Such high intensities will unavoidably be accompanied with high level of beam losses
Although the proton beam loss hazards are well understood in the accelerator community there are many unknowns in how the lost heavy ions affect the accelerator equipment and surroundings
The problems related to beam loss induced hazards can roughly be classified into three categories
1 Residual activation2 Damage to the equipment3 Shielding
Residual Activation
It is generally recognized (although arguable) that the sbquohands-onlsquo maintenance is the main beam-loss limiting factor in the proton accelerators W=1 wm allowed losses in a 1 GeV proton machine
There is no limiting values for heavy-ion beam losses recognized by the accelerator community so far
Damage to the Equipment
Superconducting magnets are the equipment most sensitive to the radiation damage
What is the overall heat load to the cryogenic system induced by lost particles
What beam loss level is safe against quenching What is the tolerable beam loss level to have
ldquoreasonablerdquo lifetime of materials with low radiation hardness like organic materials superconducting wires and semiconducting diodes
Shielding
There are spots in the accelerators and the transfer channels with planned high beam loss level like injection-extraction regions aperture limiting devices collimators targets and beam dumps
The SHIELD code has been proven to be a reliable tool to simulate neutron yields for lost ions as high as Uranium with the kinteic energy of 1 GeVu
It works reliably with U ions also at the top energy 37 GeVu foreseen in the FAIR Facilities
Structure of the ProjectProject Teams
INTAS (Western)
GSI Darmstadt EMustafin
STU Bratislava MPavlovic
NIS (Eastern)
ITEP Moscow AGolubev
VNIIEF Sarov VVatulin
INR RAS Moscow
NSobolevskiy
Project Tasks
1 Energy deposition measurements AGolubev
2 Activation measurements AFertman
3 Modeling of the experimental set-up with the help of the SHIELD code and validation of the code with the results of the measurements NSobolevskiy
4 Use of the SHIELD code to model the beam losses into the accelerator equipment and surroundings NSobolevskiy
What is done Task 1
Task 1 is finished in its measurement parts although still some more processing is needed
Outcome 1 ATIMA modeling of the dEdx seems to be the closest to the measurements
Outcome 2 The ATIMA module should be incorporated into SHIELD
The results were published as a GSI internal note were presented in PAC05 and SHIM conferences and being prepared for publication in a scientific journal
What is done Task 2
Part of Task 2 measurement of activation induced by 100 MeVu and 500 MeVu U ions on the stainless steel and copper targets is under way right these days
The main difficulty we met low level of activation and necessity of long irradiation time (main beam-time is required)
Unexpected results (report by AGolubev)
What is done Task 3
Simulations of the experimental set-ups with the help of the SHIELD code allowed not only good preparation of the experiments but also helped in interpreting the results of the measurements
It is desirable to include the ATIMA dEdx modeling into the SHIELD
More details will be given in the presentation by Dr Sobolevskiy
The methodology of the measurements were presented in EPAC04 conference
What is done Task 4
Radiation damage to the SIS100 dipoles were calculated Radiation damage to the SIS300 dipoles were calculated The results were published as GSI internal notes and
presented in EPAC04 and PAC05 conferences The main outcome the most tolerable beam loss limiting
factor is not danger of quench but the lifetime of the radiation sensitive materials like organics and semi-conducting diodes
The radiation hardness test of the semi-conducting diodes will be done at ITEP Moscow (not in the frame of this Project) The contract on this subject is almost ready to be signed between the GSI and ITEP
What has to be done Task 1
Task 1 is almost finishedThere are still measured data to be
processed (especially in the 200 MeVu case)
Publication in a scientific journal (NIM PRST) should be prepared soon
What has to be done Task 2
Processing of the results of 120 MeVu and 500 MeVu irradiation
Preparation of the 1 GeVu activation measurements
We should prepare journal publications on the activation measurements it is required from STU Bratislava
We are preparing new INTAS proposal
What has to be done Task 3
ATIMA into SHIELDUnderstanding of the results of the
activation experiments using the SHIELD code simulations
Use of the other heavy-ion transport codes PHITS FLUKA GEANT4
What has to be done Task 4
Although a lot has already been done in the frame of Task 4 there are still much more to be done according to the needs of the FAIR Project and this activity should be financed on much broader basis than just the GSI-INTAS funds
Radiation damage to the quadrupoles of the SIS100-300 Radiation damage problems foreseen for the SFRS Radiation damage from the collimators hardness of the
surrounding equipment ndash pumps electronics Beam loss simulation of the injection-extraction points Neutron doses in and outside the tunnels of the SIS100
and SIS300 synchrotrons (RHIC problems safety of the electronics and underground water activation)
Motivation
Intensities up to 1012 of U ions and 251013 of protons are foreseen in the FAIR accelerators Such high intensities will unavoidably be accompanied with high level of beam losses
Although the proton beam loss hazards are well understood in the accelerator community there are many unknowns in how the lost heavy ions affect the accelerator equipment and surroundings
The problems related to beam loss induced hazards can roughly be classified into three categories
1 Residual activation2 Damage to the equipment3 Shielding
Residual Activation
It is generally recognized (although arguable) that the sbquohands-onlsquo maintenance is the main beam-loss limiting factor in the proton accelerators W=1 wm allowed losses in a 1 GeV proton machine
There is no limiting values for heavy-ion beam losses recognized by the accelerator community so far
Damage to the Equipment
Superconducting magnets are the equipment most sensitive to the radiation damage
What is the overall heat load to the cryogenic system induced by lost particles
What beam loss level is safe against quenching What is the tolerable beam loss level to have
ldquoreasonablerdquo lifetime of materials with low radiation hardness like organic materials superconducting wires and semiconducting diodes
Shielding
There are spots in the accelerators and the transfer channels with planned high beam loss level like injection-extraction regions aperture limiting devices collimators targets and beam dumps
The SHIELD code has been proven to be a reliable tool to simulate neutron yields for lost ions as high as Uranium with the kinteic energy of 1 GeVu
It works reliably with U ions also at the top energy 37 GeVu foreseen in the FAIR Facilities
Structure of the ProjectProject Teams
INTAS (Western)
GSI Darmstadt EMustafin
STU Bratislava MPavlovic
NIS (Eastern)
ITEP Moscow AGolubev
VNIIEF Sarov VVatulin
INR RAS Moscow
NSobolevskiy
Project Tasks
1 Energy deposition measurements AGolubev
2 Activation measurements AFertman
3 Modeling of the experimental set-up with the help of the SHIELD code and validation of the code with the results of the measurements NSobolevskiy
4 Use of the SHIELD code to model the beam losses into the accelerator equipment and surroundings NSobolevskiy
What is done Task 1
Task 1 is finished in its measurement parts although still some more processing is needed
Outcome 1 ATIMA modeling of the dEdx seems to be the closest to the measurements
Outcome 2 The ATIMA module should be incorporated into SHIELD
The results were published as a GSI internal note were presented in PAC05 and SHIM conferences and being prepared for publication in a scientific journal
What is done Task 2
Part of Task 2 measurement of activation induced by 100 MeVu and 500 MeVu U ions on the stainless steel and copper targets is under way right these days
The main difficulty we met low level of activation and necessity of long irradiation time (main beam-time is required)
Unexpected results (report by AGolubev)
What is done Task 3
Simulations of the experimental set-ups with the help of the SHIELD code allowed not only good preparation of the experiments but also helped in interpreting the results of the measurements
It is desirable to include the ATIMA dEdx modeling into the SHIELD
More details will be given in the presentation by Dr Sobolevskiy
The methodology of the measurements were presented in EPAC04 conference
What is done Task 4
Radiation damage to the SIS100 dipoles were calculated Radiation damage to the SIS300 dipoles were calculated The results were published as GSI internal notes and
presented in EPAC04 and PAC05 conferences The main outcome the most tolerable beam loss limiting
factor is not danger of quench but the lifetime of the radiation sensitive materials like organics and semi-conducting diodes
The radiation hardness test of the semi-conducting diodes will be done at ITEP Moscow (not in the frame of this Project) The contract on this subject is almost ready to be signed between the GSI and ITEP
What has to be done Task 1
Task 1 is almost finishedThere are still measured data to be
processed (especially in the 200 MeVu case)
Publication in a scientific journal (NIM PRST) should be prepared soon
What has to be done Task 2
Processing of the results of 120 MeVu and 500 MeVu irradiation
Preparation of the 1 GeVu activation measurements
We should prepare journal publications on the activation measurements it is required from STU Bratislava
We are preparing new INTAS proposal
What has to be done Task 3
ATIMA into SHIELDUnderstanding of the results of the
activation experiments using the SHIELD code simulations
Use of the other heavy-ion transport codes PHITS FLUKA GEANT4
What has to be done Task 4
Although a lot has already been done in the frame of Task 4 there are still much more to be done according to the needs of the FAIR Project and this activity should be financed on much broader basis than just the GSI-INTAS funds
Radiation damage to the quadrupoles of the SIS100-300 Radiation damage problems foreseen for the SFRS Radiation damage from the collimators hardness of the
surrounding equipment ndash pumps electronics Beam loss simulation of the injection-extraction points Neutron doses in and outside the tunnels of the SIS100
and SIS300 synchrotrons (RHIC problems safety of the electronics and underground water activation)
Residual Activation
It is generally recognized (although arguable) that the sbquohands-onlsquo maintenance is the main beam-loss limiting factor in the proton accelerators W=1 wm allowed losses in a 1 GeV proton machine
There is no limiting values for heavy-ion beam losses recognized by the accelerator community so far
Damage to the Equipment
Superconducting magnets are the equipment most sensitive to the radiation damage
What is the overall heat load to the cryogenic system induced by lost particles
What beam loss level is safe against quenching What is the tolerable beam loss level to have
ldquoreasonablerdquo lifetime of materials with low radiation hardness like organic materials superconducting wires and semiconducting diodes
Shielding
There are spots in the accelerators and the transfer channels with planned high beam loss level like injection-extraction regions aperture limiting devices collimators targets and beam dumps
The SHIELD code has been proven to be a reliable tool to simulate neutron yields for lost ions as high as Uranium with the kinteic energy of 1 GeVu
It works reliably with U ions also at the top energy 37 GeVu foreseen in the FAIR Facilities
Structure of the ProjectProject Teams
INTAS (Western)
GSI Darmstadt EMustafin
STU Bratislava MPavlovic
NIS (Eastern)
ITEP Moscow AGolubev
VNIIEF Sarov VVatulin
INR RAS Moscow
NSobolevskiy
Project Tasks
1 Energy deposition measurements AGolubev
2 Activation measurements AFertman
3 Modeling of the experimental set-up with the help of the SHIELD code and validation of the code with the results of the measurements NSobolevskiy
4 Use of the SHIELD code to model the beam losses into the accelerator equipment and surroundings NSobolevskiy
What is done Task 1
Task 1 is finished in its measurement parts although still some more processing is needed
Outcome 1 ATIMA modeling of the dEdx seems to be the closest to the measurements
Outcome 2 The ATIMA module should be incorporated into SHIELD
The results were published as a GSI internal note were presented in PAC05 and SHIM conferences and being prepared for publication in a scientific journal
What is done Task 2
Part of Task 2 measurement of activation induced by 100 MeVu and 500 MeVu U ions on the stainless steel and copper targets is under way right these days
The main difficulty we met low level of activation and necessity of long irradiation time (main beam-time is required)
Unexpected results (report by AGolubev)
What is done Task 3
Simulations of the experimental set-ups with the help of the SHIELD code allowed not only good preparation of the experiments but also helped in interpreting the results of the measurements
It is desirable to include the ATIMA dEdx modeling into the SHIELD
More details will be given in the presentation by Dr Sobolevskiy
The methodology of the measurements were presented in EPAC04 conference
What is done Task 4
Radiation damage to the SIS100 dipoles were calculated Radiation damage to the SIS300 dipoles were calculated The results were published as GSI internal notes and
presented in EPAC04 and PAC05 conferences The main outcome the most tolerable beam loss limiting
factor is not danger of quench but the lifetime of the radiation sensitive materials like organics and semi-conducting diodes
The radiation hardness test of the semi-conducting diodes will be done at ITEP Moscow (not in the frame of this Project) The contract on this subject is almost ready to be signed between the GSI and ITEP
What has to be done Task 1
Task 1 is almost finishedThere are still measured data to be
processed (especially in the 200 MeVu case)
Publication in a scientific journal (NIM PRST) should be prepared soon
What has to be done Task 2
Processing of the results of 120 MeVu and 500 MeVu irradiation
Preparation of the 1 GeVu activation measurements
We should prepare journal publications on the activation measurements it is required from STU Bratislava
We are preparing new INTAS proposal
What has to be done Task 3
ATIMA into SHIELDUnderstanding of the results of the
activation experiments using the SHIELD code simulations
Use of the other heavy-ion transport codes PHITS FLUKA GEANT4
What has to be done Task 4
Although a lot has already been done in the frame of Task 4 there are still much more to be done according to the needs of the FAIR Project and this activity should be financed on much broader basis than just the GSI-INTAS funds
Radiation damage to the quadrupoles of the SIS100-300 Radiation damage problems foreseen for the SFRS Radiation damage from the collimators hardness of the
surrounding equipment ndash pumps electronics Beam loss simulation of the injection-extraction points Neutron doses in and outside the tunnels of the SIS100
and SIS300 synchrotrons (RHIC problems safety of the electronics and underground water activation)
Damage to the Equipment
Superconducting magnets are the equipment most sensitive to the radiation damage
What is the overall heat load to the cryogenic system induced by lost particles
What beam loss level is safe against quenching What is the tolerable beam loss level to have
ldquoreasonablerdquo lifetime of materials with low radiation hardness like organic materials superconducting wires and semiconducting diodes
Shielding
There are spots in the accelerators and the transfer channels with planned high beam loss level like injection-extraction regions aperture limiting devices collimators targets and beam dumps
The SHIELD code has been proven to be a reliable tool to simulate neutron yields for lost ions as high as Uranium with the kinteic energy of 1 GeVu
It works reliably with U ions also at the top energy 37 GeVu foreseen in the FAIR Facilities
Structure of the ProjectProject Teams
INTAS (Western)
GSI Darmstadt EMustafin
STU Bratislava MPavlovic
NIS (Eastern)
ITEP Moscow AGolubev
VNIIEF Sarov VVatulin
INR RAS Moscow
NSobolevskiy
Project Tasks
1 Energy deposition measurements AGolubev
2 Activation measurements AFertman
3 Modeling of the experimental set-up with the help of the SHIELD code and validation of the code with the results of the measurements NSobolevskiy
4 Use of the SHIELD code to model the beam losses into the accelerator equipment and surroundings NSobolevskiy
What is done Task 1
Task 1 is finished in its measurement parts although still some more processing is needed
Outcome 1 ATIMA modeling of the dEdx seems to be the closest to the measurements
Outcome 2 The ATIMA module should be incorporated into SHIELD
The results were published as a GSI internal note were presented in PAC05 and SHIM conferences and being prepared for publication in a scientific journal
What is done Task 2
Part of Task 2 measurement of activation induced by 100 MeVu and 500 MeVu U ions on the stainless steel and copper targets is under way right these days
The main difficulty we met low level of activation and necessity of long irradiation time (main beam-time is required)
Unexpected results (report by AGolubev)
What is done Task 3
Simulations of the experimental set-ups with the help of the SHIELD code allowed not only good preparation of the experiments but also helped in interpreting the results of the measurements
It is desirable to include the ATIMA dEdx modeling into the SHIELD
More details will be given in the presentation by Dr Sobolevskiy
The methodology of the measurements were presented in EPAC04 conference
What is done Task 4
Radiation damage to the SIS100 dipoles were calculated Radiation damage to the SIS300 dipoles were calculated The results were published as GSI internal notes and
presented in EPAC04 and PAC05 conferences The main outcome the most tolerable beam loss limiting
factor is not danger of quench but the lifetime of the radiation sensitive materials like organics and semi-conducting diodes
The radiation hardness test of the semi-conducting diodes will be done at ITEP Moscow (not in the frame of this Project) The contract on this subject is almost ready to be signed between the GSI and ITEP
What has to be done Task 1
Task 1 is almost finishedThere are still measured data to be
processed (especially in the 200 MeVu case)
Publication in a scientific journal (NIM PRST) should be prepared soon
What has to be done Task 2
Processing of the results of 120 MeVu and 500 MeVu irradiation
Preparation of the 1 GeVu activation measurements
We should prepare journal publications on the activation measurements it is required from STU Bratislava
We are preparing new INTAS proposal
What has to be done Task 3
ATIMA into SHIELDUnderstanding of the results of the
activation experiments using the SHIELD code simulations
Use of the other heavy-ion transport codes PHITS FLUKA GEANT4
What has to be done Task 4
Although a lot has already been done in the frame of Task 4 there are still much more to be done according to the needs of the FAIR Project and this activity should be financed on much broader basis than just the GSI-INTAS funds
Radiation damage to the quadrupoles of the SIS100-300 Radiation damage problems foreseen for the SFRS Radiation damage from the collimators hardness of the
surrounding equipment ndash pumps electronics Beam loss simulation of the injection-extraction points Neutron doses in and outside the tunnels of the SIS100
and SIS300 synchrotrons (RHIC problems safety of the electronics and underground water activation)
Shielding
There are spots in the accelerators and the transfer channels with planned high beam loss level like injection-extraction regions aperture limiting devices collimators targets and beam dumps
The SHIELD code has been proven to be a reliable tool to simulate neutron yields for lost ions as high as Uranium with the kinteic energy of 1 GeVu
It works reliably with U ions also at the top energy 37 GeVu foreseen in the FAIR Facilities
Structure of the ProjectProject Teams
INTAS (Western)
GSI Darmstadt EMustafin
STU Bratislava MPavlovic
NIS (Eastern)
ITEP Moscow AGolubev
VNIIEF Sarov VVatulin
INR RAS Moscow
NSobolevskiy
Project Tasks
1 Energy deposition measurements AGolubev
2 Activation measurements AFertman
3 Modeling of the experimental set-up with the help of the SHIELD code and validation of the code with the results of the measurements NSobolevskiy
4 Use of the SHIELD code to model the beam losses into the accelerator equipment and surroundings NSobolevskiy
What is done Task 1
Task 1 is finished in its measurement parts although still some more processing is needed
Outcome 1 ATIMA modeling of the dEdx seems to be the closest to the measurements
Outcome 2 The ATIMA module should be incorporated into SHIELD
The results were published as a GSI internal note were presented in PAC05 and SHIM conferences and being prepared for publication in a scientific journal
What is done Task 2
Part of Task 2 measurement of activation induced by 100 MeVu and 500 MeVu U ions on the stainless steel and copper targets is under way right these days
The main difficulty we met low level of activation and necessity of long irradiation time (main beam-time is required)
Unexpected results (report by AGolubev)
What is done Task 3
Simulations of the experimental set-ups with the help of the SHIELD code allowed not only good preparation of the experiments but also helped in interpreting the results of the measurements
It is desirable to include the ATIMA dEdx modeling into the SHIELD
More details will be given in the presentation by Dr Sobolevskiy
The methodology of the measurements were presented in EPAC04 conference
What is done Task 4
Radiation damage to the SIS100 dipoles were calculated Radiation damage to the SIS300 dipoles were calculated The results were published as GSI internal notes and
presented in EPAC04 and PAC05 conferences The main outcome the most tolerable beam loss limiting
factor is not danger of quench but the lifetime of the radiation sensitive materials like organics and semi-conducting diodes
The radiation hardness test of the semi-conducting diodes will be done at ITEP Moscow (not in the frame of this Project) The contract on this subject is almost ready to be signed between the GSI and ITEP
What has to be done Task 1
Task 1 is almost finishedThere are still measured data to be
processed (especially in the 200 MeVu case)
Publication in a scientific journal (NIM PRST) should be prepared soon
What has to be done Task 2
Processing of the results of 120 MeVu and 500 MeVu irradiation
Preparation of the 1 GeVu activation measurements
We should prepare journal publications on the activation measurements it is required from STU Bratislava
We are preparing new INTAS proposal
What has to be done Task 3
ATIMA into SHIELDUnderstanding of the results of the
activation experiments using the SHIELD code simulations
Use of the other heavy-ion transport codes PHITS FLUKA GEANT4
What has to be done Task 4
Although a lot has already been done in the frame of Task 4 there are still much more to be done according to the needs of the FAIR Project and this activity should be financed on much broader basis than just the GSI-INTAS funds
Radiation damage to the quadrupoles of the SIS100-300 Radiation damage problems foreseen for the SFRS Radiation damage from the collimators hardness of the
surrounding equipment ndash pumps electronics Beam loss simulation of the injection-extraction points Neutron doses in and outside the tunnels of the SIS100
and SIS300 synchrotrons (RHIC problems safety of the electronics and underground water activation)
Structure of the ProjectProject Teams
INTAS (Western)
GSI Darmstadt EMustafin
STU Bratislava MPavlovic
NIS (Eastern)
ITEP Moscow AGolubev
VNIIEF Sarov VVatulin
INR RAS Moscow
NSobolevskiy
Project Tasks
1 Energy deposition measurements AGolubev
2 Activation measurements AFertman
3 Modeling of the experimental set-up with the help of the SHIELD code and validation of the code with the results of the measurements NSobolevskiy
4 Use of the SHIELD code to model the beam losses into the accelerator equipment and surroundings NSobolevskiy
What is done Task 1
Task 1 is finished in its measurement parts although still some more processing is needed
Outcome 1 ATIMA modeling of the dEdx seems to be the closest to the measurements
Outcome 2 The ATIMA module should be incorporated into SHIELD
The results were published as a GSI internal note were presented in PAC05 and SHIM conferences and being prepared for publication in a scientific journal
What is done Task 2
Part of Task 2 measurement of activation induced by 100 MeVu and 500 MeVu U ions on the stainless steel and copper targets is under way right these days
The main difficulty we met low level of activation and necessity of long irradiation time (main beam-time is required)
Unexpected results (report by AGolubev)
What is done Task 3
Simulations of the experimental set-ups with the help of the SHIELD code allowed not only good preparation of the experiments but also helped in interpreting the results of the measurements
It is desirable to include the ATIMA dEdx modeling into the SHIELD
More details will be given in the presentation by Dr Sobolevskiy
The methodology of the measurements were presented in EPAC04 conference
What is done Task 4
Radiation damage to the SIS100 dipoles were calculated Radiation damage to the SIS300 dipoles were calculated The results were published as GSI internal notes and
presented in EPAC04 and PAC05 conferences The main outcome the most tolerable beam loss limiting
factor is not danger of quench but the lifetime of the radiation sensitive materials like organics and semi-conducting diodes
The radiation hardness test of the semi-conducting diodes will be done at ITEP Moscow (not in the frame of this Project) The contract on this subject is almost ready to be signed between the GSI and ITEP
What has to be done Task 1
Task 1 is almost finishedThere are still measured data to be
processed (especially in the 200 MeVu case)
Publication in a scientific journal (NIM PRST) should be prepared soon
What has to be done Task 2
Processing of the results of 120 MeVu and 500 MeVu irradiation
Preparation of the 1 GeVu activation measurements
We should prepare journal publications on the activation measurements it is required from STU Bratislava
We are preparing new INTAS proposal
What has to be done Task 3
ATIMA into SHIELDUnderstanding of the results of the
activation experiments using the SHIELD code simulations
Use of the other heavy-ion transport codes PHITS FLUKA GEANT4
What has to be done Task 4
Although a lot has already been done in the frame of Task 4 there are still much more to be done according to the needs of the FAIR Project and this activity should be financed on much broader basis than just the GSI-INTAS funds
Radiation damage to the quadrupoles of the SIS100-300 Radiation damage problems foreseen for the SFRS Radiation damage from the collimators hardness of the
surrounding equipment ndash pumps electronics Beam loss simulation of the injection-extraction points Neutron doses in and outside the tunnels of the SIS100
and SIS300 synchrotrons (RHIC problems safety of the electronics and underground water activation)
What is done Task 1
Task 1 is finished in its measurement parts although still some more processing is needed
Outcome 1 ATIMA modeling of the dEdx seems to be the closest to the measurements
Outcome 2 The ATIMA module should be incorporated into SHIELD
The results were published as a GSI internal note were presented in PAC05 and SHIM conferences and being prepared for publication in a scientific journal
What is done Task 2
Part of Task 2 measurement of activation induced by 100 MeVu and 500 MeVu U ions on the stainless steel and copper targets is under way right these days
The main difficulty we met low level of activation and necessity of long irradiation time (main beam-time is required)
Unexpected results (report by AGolubev)
What is done Task 3
Simulations of the experimental set-ups with the help of the SHIELD code allowed not only good preparation of the experiments but also helped in interpreting the results of the measurements
It is desirable to include the ATIMA dEdx modeling into the SHIELD
More details will be given in the presentation by Dr Sobolevskiy
The methodology of the measurements were presented in EPAC04 conference
What is done Task 4
Radiation damage to the SIS100 dipoles were calculated Radiation damage to the SIS300 dipoles were calculated The results were published as GSI internal notes and
presented in EPAC04 and PAC05 conferences The main outcome the most tolerable beam loss limiting
factor is not danger of quench but the lifetime of the radiation sensitive materials like organics and semi-conducting diodes
The radiation hardness test of the semi-conducting diodes will be done at ITEP Moscow (not in the frame of this Project) The contract on this subject is almost ready to be signed between the GSI and ITEP
What has to be done Task 1
Task 1 is almost finishedThere are still measured data to be
processed (especially in the 200 MeVu case)
Publication in a scientific journal (NIM PRST) should be prepared soon
What has to be done Task 2
Processing of the results of 120 MeVu and 500 MeVu irradiation
Preparation of the 1 GeVu activation measurements
We should prepare journal publications on the activation measurements it is required from STU Bratislava
We are preparing new INTAS proposal
What has to be done Task 3
ATIMA into SHIELDUnderstanding of the results of the
activation experiments using the SHIELD code simulations
Use of the other heavy-ion transport codes PHITS FLUKA GEANT4
What has to be done Task 4
Although a lot has already been done in the frame of Task 4 there are still much more to be done according to the needs of the FAIR Project and this activity should be financed on much broader basis than just the GSI-INTAS funds
Radiation damage to the quadrupoles of the SIS100-300 Radiation damage problems foreseen for the SFRS Radiation damage from the collimators hardness of the
surrounding equipment ndash pumps electronics Beam loss simulation of the injection-extraction points Neutron doses in and outside the tunnels of the SIS100
and SIS300 synchrotrons (RHIC problems safety of the electronics and underground water activation)
What is done Task 2
Part of Task 2 measurement of activation induced by 100 MeVu and 500 MeVu U ions on the stainless steel and copper targets is under way right these days
The main difficulty we met low level of activation and necessity of long irradiation time (main beam-time is required)
Unexpected results (report by AGolubev)
What is done Task 3
Simulations of the experimental set-ups with the help of the SHIELD code allowed not only good preparation of the experiments but also helped in interpreting the results of the measurements
It is desirable to include the ATIMA dEdx modeling into the SHIELD
More details will be given in the presentation by Dr Sobolevskiy
The methodology of the measurements were presented in EPAC04 conference
What is done Task 4
Radiation damage to the SIS100 dipoles were calculated Radiation damage to the SIS300 dipoles were calculated The results were published as GSI internal notes and
presented in EPAC04 and PAC05 conferences The main outcome the most tolerable beam loss limiting
factor is not danger of quench but the lifetime of the radiation sensitive materials like organics and semi-conducting diodes
The radiation hardness test of the semi-conducting diodes will be done at ITEP Moscow (not in the frame of this Project) The contract on this subject is almost ready to be signed between the GSI and ITEP
What has to be done Task 1
Task 1 is almost finishedThere are still measured data to be
processed (especially in the 200 MeVu case)
Publication in a scientific journal (NIM PRST) should be prepared soon
What has to be done Task 2
Processing of the results of 120 MeVu and 500 MeVu irradiation
Preparation of the 1 GeVu activation measurements
We should prepare journal publications on the activation measurements it is required from STU Bratislava
We are preparing new INTAS proposal
What has to be done Task 3
ATIMA into SHIELDUnderstanding of the results of the
activation experiments using the SHIELD code simulations
Use of the other heavy-ion transport codes PHITS FLUKA GEANT4
What has to be done Task 4
Although a lot has already been done in the frame of Task 4 there are still much more to be done according to the needs of the FAIR Project and this activity should be financed on much broader basis than just the GSI-INTAS funds
Radiation damage to the quadrupoles of the SIS100-300 Radiation damage problems foreseen for the SFRS Radiation damage from the collimators hardness of the
surrounding equipment ndash pumps electronics Beam loss simulation of the injection-extraction points Neutron doses in and outside the tunnels of the SIS100
and SIS300 synchrotrons (RHIC problems safety of the electronics and underground water activation)
What is done Task 3
Simulations of the experimental set-ups with the help of the SHIELD code allowed not only good preparation of the experiments but also helped in interpreting the results of the measurements
It is desirable to include the ATIMA dEdx modeling into the SHIELD
More details will be given in the presentation by Dr Sobolevskiy
The methodology of the measurements were presented in EPAC04 conference
What is done Task 4
Radiation damage to the SIS100 dipoles were calculated Radiation damage to the SIS300 dipoles were calculated The results were published as GSI internal notes and
presented in EPAC04 and PAC05 conferences The main outcome the most tolerable beam loss limiting
factor is not danger of quench but the lifetime of the radiation sensitive materials like organics and semi-conducting diodes
The radiation hardness test of the semi-conducting diodes will be done at ITEP Moscow (not in the frame of this Project) The contract on this subject is almost ready to be signed between the GSI and ITEP
What has to be done Task 1
Task 1 is almost finishedThere are still measured data to be
processed (especially in the 200 MeVu case)
Publication in a scientific journal (NIM PRST) should be prepared soon
What has to be done Task 2
Processing of the results of 120 MeVu and 500 MeVu irradiation
Preparation of the 1 GeVu activation measurements
We should prepare journal publications on the activation measurements it is required from STU Bratislava
We are preparing new INTAS proposal
What has to be done Task 3
ATIMA into SHIELDUnderstanding of the results of the
activation experiments using the SHIELD code simulations
Use of the other heavy-ion transport codes PHITS FLUKA GEANT4
What has to be done Task 4
Although a lot has already been done in the frame of Task 4 there are still much more to be done according to the needs of the FAIR Project and this activity should be financed on much broader basis than just the GSI-INTAS funds
Radiation damage to the quadrupoles of the SIS100-300 Radiation damage problems foreseen for the SFRS Radiation damage from the collimators hardness of the
surrounding equipment ndash pumps electronics Beam loss simulation of the injection-extraction points Neutron doses in and outside the tunnels of the SIS100
and SIS300 synchrotrons (RHIC problems safety of the electronics and underground water activation)
What is done Task 4
Radiation damage to the SIS100 dipoles were calculated Radiation damage to the SIS300 dipoles were calculated The results were published as GSI internal notes and
presented in EPAC04 and PAC05 conferences The main outcome the most tolerable beam loss limiting
factor is not danger of quench but the lifetime of the radiation sensitive materials like organics and semi-conducting diodes
The radiation hardness test of the semi-conducting diodes will be done at ITEP Moscow (not in the frame of this Project) The contract on this subject is almost ready to be signed between the GSI and ITEP
What has to be done Task 1
Task 1 is almost finishedThere are still measured data to be
processed (especially in the 200 MeVu case)
Publication in a scientific journal (NIM PRST) should be prepared soon
What has to be done Task 2
Processing of the results of 120 MeVu and 500 MeVu irradiation
Preparation of the 1 GeVu activation measurements
We should prepare journal publications on the activation measurements it is required from STU Bratislava
We are preparing new INTAS proposal
What has to be done Task 3
ATIMA into SHIELDUnderstanding of the results of the
activation experiments using the SHIELD code simulations
Use of the other heavy-ion transport codes PHITS FLUKA GEANT4
What has to be done Task 4
Although a lot has already been done in the frame of Task 4 there are still much more to be done according to the needs of the FAIR Project and this activity should be financed on much broader basis than just the GSI-INTAS funds
Radiation damage to the quadrupoles of the SIS100-300 Radiation damage problems foreseen for the SFRS Radiation damage from the collimators hardness of the
surrounding equipment ndash pumps electronics Beam loss simulation of the injection-extraction points Neutron doses in and outside the tunnels of the SIS100
and SIS300 synchrotrons (RHIC problems safety of the electronics and underground water activation)
What has to be done Task 1
Task 1 is almost finishedThere are still measured data to be
processed (especially in the 200 MeVu case)
Publication in a scientific journal (NIM PRST) should be prepared soon
What has to be done Task 2
Processing of the results of 120 MeVu and 500 MeVu irradiation
Preparation of the 1 GeVu activation measurements
We should prepare journal publications on the activation measurements it is required from STU Bratislava
We are preparing new INTAS proposal
What has to be done Task 3
ATIMA into SHIELDUnderstanding of the results of the
activation experiments using the SHIELD code simulations
Use of the other heavy-ion transport codes PHITS FLUKA GEANT4
What has to be done Task 4
Although a lot has already been done in the frame of Task 4 there are still much more to be done according to the needs of the FAIR Project and this activity should be financed on much broader basis than just the GSI-INTAS funds
Radiation damage to the quadrupoles of the SIS100-300 Radiation damage problems foreseen for the SFRS Radiation damage from the collimators hardness of the
surrounding equipment ndash pumps electronics Beam loss simulation of the injection-extraction points Neutron doses in and outside the tunnels of the SIS100
and SIS300 synchrotrons (RHIC problems safety of the electronics and underground water activation)
What has to be done Task 2
Processing of the results of 120 MeVu and 500 MeVu irradiation
Preparation of the 1 GeVu activation measurements
We should prepare journal publications on the activation measurements it is required from STU Bratislava
We are preparing new INTAS proposal
What has to be done Task 3
ATIMA into SHIELDUnderstanding of the results of the
activation experiments using the SHIELD code simulations
Use of the other heavy-ion transport codes PHITS FLUKA GEANT4
What has to be done Task 4
Although a lot has already been done in the frame of Task 4 there are still much more to be done according to the needs of the FAIR Project and this activity should be financed on much broader basis than just the GSI-INTAS funds
Radiation damage to the quadrupoles of the SIS100-300 Radiation damage problems foreseen for the SFRS Radiation damage from the collimators hardness of the
surrounding equipment ndash pumps electronics Beam loss simulation of the injection-extraction points Neutron doses in and outside the tunnels of the SIS100
and SIS300 synchrotrons (RHIC problems safety of the electronics and underground water activation)
What has to be done Task 3
ATIMA into SHIELDUnderstanding of the results of the
activation experiments using the SHIELD code simulations
Use of the other heavy-ion transport codes PHITS FLUKA GEANT4
What has to be done Task 4
Although a lot has already been done in the frame of Task 4 there are still much more to be done according to the needs of the FAIR Project and this activity should be financed on much broader basis than just the GSI-INTAS funds
Radiation damage to the quadrupoles of the SIS100-300 Radiation damage problems foreseen for the SFRS Radiation damage from the collimators hardness of the
surrounding equipment ndash pumps electronics Beam loss simulation of the injection-extraction points Neutron doses in and outside the tunnels of the SIS100
and SIS300 synchrotrons (RHIC problems safety of the electronics and underground water activation)
What has to be done Task 4
Although a lot has already been done in the frame of Task 4 there are still much more to be done according to the needs of the FAIR Project and this activity should be financed on much broader basis than just the GSI-INTAS funds
Radiation damage to the quadrupoles of the SIS100-300 Radiation damage problems foreseen for the SFRS Radiation damage from the collimators hardness of the
surrounding equipment ndash pumps electronics Beam loss simulation of the injection-extraction points Neutron doses in and outside the tunnels of the SIS100
and SIS300 synchrotrons (RHIC problems safety of the electronics and underground water activation)