experiment design

33
Novel Tools for (Functional) Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis Development and Implementation in the Scientific and Statistical Computing Core Robert W Cox Robert W Cox and a cast of several

Upload: candice-mack

Post on 03-Jan-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Novel Tools for (Functional) Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis Development and Implementation in the Scientific and Statistical Computing Core Robert W Cox and a cast of several. MR-scanner. Raw data. Scanner Subject Stimulus Delivery. Reconstruction Distortion correction. BOLD EPI. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Experiment design

Novel Tools for (Functional) Magnetic

Resonance Image Analysis

Development and Implementation in the Scientific and Statistical

Computing Core

Robert W CoxRobert W Coxand a cast of several

Page 2: Experiment design

Raw dataMR-scanner BOLD EPI

AnatomyFunction

Func. & Anat.

BOLD signal

ScannerSubjectStimulus Delivery

Group analysis

Experiment design

ReconstructionDistortion correction

Co-registration

Statistical modelsInference

Page 3: Experiment design

Scientific & Statistical Computing CoreScientific & Statistical Computing Core• Develop and implement new methodologies to meet

user needs• Consult with IRP users/groups regarding

– Experimental design– Processing methods and tools– Statistical inferences

• Conduct classes on designing and processing FMRI experiments

• Answer FMRI / MRI questions on message board • Distribute & maintain our open-source software tools• Facilitate cross-talk between different FMRI tools:

– AFNI, FSL, FMRIstat, FreeSurfer, Caret, SPM, …

Rich sourceof ideas fornovel tools

Page 4: Experiment design

AFNI + SUMA

• AFNI = collection of programs for FMRI analysis– Visualization

• 2D, 3D, time-series, cortical surface (SUMA)– Time Series Analysis

• Linear & nonlinear regression– Statistics on 3D Image Collections

• 1-5 way ANOVA; non-parametrics; SEM– Data editing tools

• Spatial and temporal filtering• 3D image registration• Clustering; ROI drawing & Atlas-based ROIs

Page 5: Experiment design

The AFNIAFNI / SSCC Philosophy• Enable users to stay close to their data

– Save intermediate results– Look at images and data in connected ways

• User controls processing steps and parameters– Everyone has an opinion– Special problems need special solutions

• Efficient (fast) implementations– Things that are easy and fast to do will get done

more often• Help the users

– Until our patience runs out

Page 6: Experiment design

Features Added to AFNIAFNI and SUMASUMA in Response to User Requests and / or

Problems / Complaints(at least in part)

Next Set of Slides

Page 7: Experiment design

Feature: Atlases• Problem: Navigating in a complicated folded up 3D

object (i.e., the brain) with few easily recognized landmarks

• Solution: Coordinate-based brain atlases– Accepting the 5-10 mm uncertainty of brain coordinates

• Atlas #1: Talairach-Tournoux atlas– As parsed by Peter Fox’s group at UT San Antonio

• Atlas #2: Cytoarchitectonic atlases from Karl Zilles’ group at Forschungszentrum Jülich– 10 brains being sliced & diced & stained & scanned– About 40% complete at this time

• Where Am I? + Jump To + Colorization + ROIs• Plans: keep up with Zilles; Animal atlases? …

Page 8: Experiment design

Example: Where Am I?

Page 9: Experiment design

• Problem: other skull stripping software (e.g., BET in

FSL) didn’t work reliably enough• Solution was to re-visit problem from scratch, and

build on BET’s surface growing algorithm• Then add new features: special knowledge about

where the eyes are likely to be; 3D edges; etc.• Then test it on the hard cases from NIH (ab)users• Extra feature: extend it to monkey images• Plans: continue testing and improvements

Feature: Skull Stripping A

Page 10: Experiment design

Feature: De-Spiking• Problem: occasional big spikes in echo planar

images gathered for functional MRI– Problem eventually traced to gradient coil– In the meantime: can studies be saved?

• Wrecks the standard time series analysis

A

Page 11: Experiment design

Feature: Amplitude Modulated FMRI• Situation: Each stimulus event comes with an

auxiliary parameter– May be measured (GSR, reaction time, …) or may

be determined by experimenter• Want to determine if FMRI response magnitude is

proportional to this auxiliary parameter• Solution was to add amplitude modulated

regressors to AFNI’s 3dDeconvolve program– Two regressors per condition– First is: each stimulus response identical– Second is: each stimulus response proportional

to auxiliary parameter for that stimulus

• Plans: 2-3 params/event; event-wise amplitudes

Page 12: Experiment design

Feature: Nonlinear Regression Models• Pharmacological models for time series analysis

– AFNI’s nonlinear regression program 3dNLfim• Michaelis-Menton dynamics for BOLD FMRI with

psychoactive drugs (e.g., ethanol)

• Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI for quantifying Gd contrast leakage through blood-brain barrier

Page 13: Experiment design

Feature: Smart Blurring• FMRI time series datasets are often smoothed

(blurred) in space to– Reduce noise (by averaging)

– Increase intra-subject activation “blob” overlap• Blurring brain & non-brain signals together is silly• When combining data from different scanners (i.e.,

multi-center studies), image smoothness varies– Should blur images until they have the same

level of smoothness so that inter-scanner combinations make statistical sense

• Developed a method for blurring inside a mask that stops when image noise reaches specified level of smoothness: ut =∇⋅[D(x,t)∇u(x,t)]

Page 14: Experiment design

Feature: Structural Equation Modeling• SEM is a form of connectivity analysis• Input: correlations between activated ROIs

– Regions where the activations fluctuate in strength together will be more highly correlated

• Input: connectivity diagram between ROIs• Output: strength of connections• Can also search for “better” fitting connections

Page 15: Experiment design

Feature: All-in-One Analysis Program• Common complaint: “AFNI is tooooooo hard to use”• Analysis of single subject data involves several

steps, each instantiated in separate programs– Registration, smoothing, normalizing, model

analysis• Solution is a program afni_proc.py that will run all

these programs in a coherent sequence– Intermediate results are saved to make it

possible to track backwards when results are confusing

• This script is not intended to let the user avoid understanding the data analysis process!

Page 16: Experiment design

Feature: Diffusion Tensor Analysis• Goal: Compute the Diffusion Tensor (etc.) from

Diffusion Weighted image collections– Problem #1: log+linear method is inaccurate in

highly anisotropic locations (the cool places to be)– Problem #2: published nonlinear solution

methods not available in open-source software• Solution was to create and implement an efficient

robust nonlinear method for finding the diffusion tensor D in each voxel– Also, a optional nonlinear image smoother (2D

and 3D) to reduce noise in homogenous areas• Our code now incorporated into DTI Query, an

open-source tractography program from Stanford

Page 17: Experiment design

Feature: Inter-Modality Registration• Goal: Efficiently align 3D volumes acquired with

different imaging contrasts• Solution is a general program using histogram-

based measurements of image matching (e.g., mutual information)

• This one is still very much a work-in-progress– Works pretty well on “simple” cases (e.g., whole-

brain to whole-brain)

– Dealing with partial-brain to whole-brain and with brain images that have holes in them is less reliable right now

– Also want to add non-affine warping capabilities

Page 18: Experiment design

Example: Inter-Modality Registration A

Skull Stripped MRI

… masked CT

… CT overlaid on MRI in color - unaligned

… CT overlaid on MRI in color - aligned

Page 19: Experiment design

Feature: Analysis of Mn Contrast MRI

• Mn is an MRI contrast agent and a calcium analog• Goal: time-dependent in vivo tract tracing in

monkeys• Problems abound:

– Like FMRI, signal changes are small– Other artifacts from day-to-day scanning are

larger– Simple image subtraction isn’t reliable

• Next 3 slides: some data and results …

Page 20: Experiment design

Mn Data: Different Days A

Page 21: Experiment design

Mn Data: Subtract & t-Test A

Page 22: Experiment design

Mn Data: Cleverer t-Test A

Page 23: Experiment design

Features Added to AFNIAFNI and SUMASUMA in Response

to Our Own Crazy Thoughts

(mostly)

Next Set of Slides

Page 24: Experiment design

Functional Functional activationactivation & Motion estimation in realtime

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

AFNI

Dimon

MR Scanner, Image Files

Realtime FMRI

Feedback Receiver

Page 25: Experiment design

Surface-Based Analyses• Create cortical surface models, project 3D data to

these surfaces, analyze in that space– Respects geometry and topology of cortex

• Most AFNI statistical tools now work with image data defined over surfaces as well as over 3D volumes

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

• Movie capture from SUMA• Activation map projected from AFNI

Page 26: Experiment design

Visualization & Links Between Modes

Page 27: Experiment design
Page 28: Experiment design

NIfTINeuroimaging Informatics Technology Initiative

• Goal: facilitate inter-operability of FMRI data analysis software

• First fruit: NIfTI-1.1 standard for storing datasets defined over 3D volumes (plus time axis)– Works with AFNI, FSL, SPM, BrainVoyager, …

• Agreement is not a one-time thing– Ongoing process is needed to deal with compatibility, extensions,

new ideas along the same line, …

• Efforts underway:– NIfTI-G: standard for storing cortical surface models (and

associated data)– NIfTI-W: standard for storing non-affine spatial warps

Page 29: Experiment design

• Programs “talk” to each other (esp. AFNI & SUMA)• Exchange data• Issue commands - you can script many parts of the AFNI & SUMA graphical interfaces

3dSkullStrip

SUMA

AFNI

Closely Linked Communication

Page 30: Experiment design

Developer-friendlinessRealtime physiological monitoring using AFNI:Jerzy Bodurka, FIM/LBC/NIMH

Page 31: Experiment design

• Train Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier on a collection of pre-categorized 3D brain images

• e.g., “looking at house” and “looking at face”

• Classifies new 3D images into the categories

Brain State Classification

R L

From Stephen LaConte;Emory, transitioning to Rice

Page 32: Experiment design

• Much of our most fruitful and satisfying work comes from close and ongoing interactions with investigators that have interesting problems– Derived from studies that are pushing the

envelope of deriving information from MRI

• We are here to provide solutions to problems (of image analysis)– Your current short-term problems (lots of these!)

– Your actual longer-term problems– What we think your future needs will be

Penultimate Slide

Page 33: Experiment design

Ultimate Slide