executive summary drive

8/18/2019 Executive Summary Drive

1/34

1

Analysis of Network Performance of the Telecom Service

Providers in 7 cities including Delhi & Mumbai

Background

1. TRAI is regularly monitoring the performance of Telecom Service Providers (TSP)

against the benchmarks for the various Quality of Service (QoS) parameters laid down

by the Authority. TSPs submit Performance Monitoring Reports to TRAI every quarter.

2. TRAI also undertakes audit and assessment of Quality of Service through

independent agencies to verify the Quality of Service claimed. The Audit agencies

conduct sample ‘Drive tests’ across various cities all over the country as part of audit

and assessment of the TSPs’ performance. The audit reports of these agencies are

published on the website of TRAI.

3. In view of complaints on call drops and other network issues, on behalf of TRAI,

an independent Drive Test (IDT)was conducted and uploaded in the website, on

. 23 24 2015

& 9

11

2015 ,

.

.

27

& 28

2015.

5

. : 15 16 2015.

. : 14 15 2015.

. : 16 17 2015.

. : 18 19 2015.

4. 15/ 16

.

.

. 21 25 ,2016

. 5 8 ,2016

. 21 23 ,2015

. 28 30 ,2015

. 21 23 ,2015

. 28 30 ,2015

. 4 7 ,2016


2/34

2

5. In all the cities were Drive tests were carried out earlier, the same route was

followed during the latest drive.(ie around 300kms) For Delhi and Mumbai, the route

length was increased to 600 Km after taking inputs from the TSPs about the

additional route. In other cities also , the route has been increased wherever possible

6. .

2 3

2 .

7.

(); ;

; , ; .

8. .

Target Network in Mumbai:

MUMBAI

5 Jan to 8 Jan 2016

Mumbai

600 Km

30.85 L (Census 2011)

603 Km Sq.

Drive tests were conducted for 12 Networks in the city.

Drive Test Route

1. The total Drive test route covered over the four days was approximately 600

kms. The map below depicts the route that was followed during the MumbaiDrive test.


3/34

3

A. RF Coverage rate

2. Radio Frequency (RF) Coverage relates to the geographical footprint within an area

that has sufficient RF signal strength to allow for a call/data session. The RF Coverage

rate of an operator is calculated on the basis of % of samples in which the receive level

(Rx) is better than -85 dbm in vehicle. The test results obtained in Mumbai on the

drive test route (approx. 600 km) are as follows:

% 16 % 15 % 15

2 92.50% 90.02% 93.63%

2 92.47% 91.10% 95.13%

2 90.27% 95.00% 95.40%

2 91.04%

2 94.26% 87.30% 89.49%

2 89.93% 94.92% 97.07%

2 89.52% 88.65% 91.08%

99.23%

99.97%

3 92.67%

3 45.38%

3 66.60%


4/34

4

3. As per the drive test report, the coverage along the selected route of some of

the operators has improved during this period and results for most of the operators

were found to be satisfactory.

B. Accessibility

4. Accessibility is the ability of a user to obtain the requested service from the

network.

5. Accessibility is monitored by measuring the Call Setup Success Rate

(CSSR).The CSSR is defined as the ratio of Established Calls to number of Call

Attempts. When a user “A” initiates a call to user “B” in the same network, a

Stand Alone Dedicated Control Channel (SDCCH)is allocated for setting up the

call. Once the call is setup, a Traffic Channel(TCH) is allocated for the call. Non

availability of control channel or traffic channel will lead to congestion which is

measured through the SDCCH congestion and the TCH congestion.The SDCCHcongestion and TCH congestion are monitored through the ‘Blocked Call rate’

parameter in the Drive test.

6. TRAI has laid down the QoS benchmarks for CSSR >95%; SDCCH

congestion at 1% and TCH congestion at 2% respectively [the blocked call rate

at 3%].The test results obtained are as follows:

(=95%)

16 15 15 16 15 15

2 7.37% 4.63% 4.36% 92.63% 95.37% 95.64%

2 9.03% 3.02% 3.02% 90.97% 96.98% 96.98%

2 13.92% 2.19% 10.00% 86.08% 97.81% 90.00%

2 10.60% 89.40%

2 22.67% 7.44% 31.13% 77.33% 92.56% 68.88%

2 12.03% 4.84% 4.58% 87.97% 95.16% 95.42%

2 4.02% 2.61% 3.93% 95.98% 97.39% 96.07%

2.04% 97.96%

0.61% 99.39%

3 6.00% 94.00%

3 11.67% 88.33%

3 2.65% 97.35%

7. As per the drive test report, none of the operators have shown improvementin QoS benchmark for blocked call rate.


5/34

5

C. Retainability

8. Retainability is the ability of a service, once obtained, to continue to be provided

under given conditions for a requested duration. During the Drive test,Retainability is

measured by making a call from user A to user B and after the call is successfully

setup, holding the call for a duration of 90 sec/ 120 sec. If the call drops during this

period it is considered to be a dropped call. The Call Drop Rate (CDR) parameter gives

a reliable measure of the ability of the mobile network to maintain a call once it has

been correctly established. TRAI has laid down the QoS benchmarks for call drop

rate to be less than2%. The test results obtained for this parameter are:

(95%. Accordingly the RxQuality is determined and as can be

seen from the table below:

(>=95%)

16 15 15

2 85.82% 91.34% 85.60%

2 91.59% 95.13% 91.11%

2 86.57% 94.22% 86.46%


6/34

6

2 75.51%

2 87.50% 91.68% 85.53%

2 89.06% 93.95% 89.50%

2 90.59% 94.13% 89.56%

95.11%

99.32%

3 71.36%

3 45.04%

3 45.97%

.

11. As per the drive test report, only CDMA operators have met the benchmarksprescribed by TRAI.


7/34

7

O v e r a l l O p e r a t o r A

n a l y s i s ( F o r A l l 4 d a y s i . e . f o r 6 0 0 k m )

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

3

3

3

1 6

5 0 2

5 9 8

6 6 1

5 6 6

6 7 5

5 9 0

5

9 7

4 8 9

4 9 1

6 3 3

5 7 4

5 6 7

1 5

4 9 7

4 6 4

5 0 2

4 9 7

4 5 5

4

9 8

1 5

5 5 0

5 2 9

5 7 0

5 7 5

5 4 6

5

3 5

( < 3 % )

1 6

7 . 3 7 %

9 . 0 3 %

1 3 . 9 2 %

1 0

. 6 0 %

2 2 . 6 7 %

1 2 . 0 3 %

4 . 0 2 %

2 . 0 4 %

0 . 6 1 %

6 . 0

0 %

1 1 . 6 7 %

2 . 6 5 %

1 5

4 . 6 3 %

3 . 0 2 %

2 . 1 9 %

7 . 4 4 %

4 . 8 4 %

2 . 6 1 %

1 5

4 . 3 6 %

3 . 0 2 %

1 0 . 0 0 %

3 1 . 1 3 %

4 . 5 8 %

3 . 9 3 %

( > = 9 5 % )

1 6

9 2 . 6 3 %

9 0 . 9 7 %

8 6 . 0 8 %

8 9

. 4 0 %

7 7 . 3 3 %

8 7 . 9 7 %

9 5 . 9 8 %

9 7 . 9 6 %

9 9 . 3 9 %

9 4 . 0 0 %

8 8 . 3 3 %

9 7 . 3 5 %

1 5

9 5 . 3 7 %

9 6 . 9 8 %

9 7 . 8 1 %

9 2 . 5 6 %

9 5 . 1 6 %

9 7 . 3 9 %

1 5

9 5 . 6 4 %

9 6 . 9 8 %

9 0 . 0 0 %

6 8 . 8 8 %

9 5 . 4 2 %

9 6 . 0 7 %

( < = 2 % )

1 6

5 . 5 9 %

4 . 2 3 %

7 . 3 8 %

1 3

. 0 4 %

9 . 7 7 %

1 0 . 9 8 %

5 . 7 6 %

4 . 8 0 %

3 . 8 9 %

2 . 8

6 %

1 5 . 5 8 %

5 . 9 8 %

1 5

2 . 9 4 %

2 . 6 8 %

2 . 6 4 %

3 . 2 4 %

5 . 4 7 %

5 . 5 1 %

1 5

3 . 1 9 %

0 . 9 7 %

5 . 5 6 %

2 . 2 9 %

5 . 5 1 %

4 . 8 3 %

( > = 9 5 % )

1 6

8 5 . 8 2 %

9 1 . 5 9 %

8 6 . 5 7 %

7 5

. 5 1 %

8 7 . 5 0 %

8 9 . 0 6 %

9 0 . 5 9 %

9 5 . 1 1 %

9 9 . 3 2 %

7 1 . 3 6 %

4 5 . 0 4 %

4 5 . 9 7 %

1 5

9 1 . 3 4 %

9 5 . 1 3 %

9 4 . 2 2 %

9 1 . 6 8 %

9 3 . 9 5 %

9 4 . 1 3 %

1 5

8 5 . 6 0 %

9 1 . 1 1 %

8 6 . 4 6 %

8 5 . 5 3 %

8 9 . 5 0 %

8 9 . 5 6 %


8/34

8


n a l y s i s ( F o r D a y 1 a n d D

a y 2 i . e . f o r 3 0 0 k m )


9/34

9

1 2 .

T h e c o m p a r i s o n o f t h e D r i v e t e s t r e s u l

t s r e v e a l e d t h a t m o s t o f t h e o p e r a t o r s w e r e n o t a b l e t o

i m p r o v e

t h e

n e t w o r k q u a l i t y

.

.


10/34

10

Target Network in Kolkata:

Kolkata

21th to 23th Dec' 15

Kolkata

300 Kilometres

4.57 Crores (Census 2011)

185 Square Km

Drive tests were conducted for 14 Networks in the city.

Drive Test Route

13. The total Drive test route covered over the three days was approximately 300

kms. The map below depicts the route that was followed during the Kolkata Drive test.


11/34

11

A. RFCoveragerate

14. The test results obtained inKolkottaon the drive test route (approx. 300 km) are

as follows:

% ( 15) % ( 15)

95.34% 89.57%

89.57%

95.12% 95.73%

97.16%

95.21% 92.35%

83.49%

91.79% 80.28%

99.94% 98.05%

84.02% 91.97%

88.94%

99.84% 89.45%

87.94% 76.14%

88.75% 96.62%

91.73%

15. As per the drive test report, the coverage of most of the operators along the

selected route are similar to earlier tests.

B.Accessibility

16. Accessibility is the ability of a user to obtain the requested service from the

network. .17. TRAI has laid down the QoS benchmarks for CSSR >95%; SDCCH

congestion at 1% and TCH congestion at 2% respectively [the blocked call rate

at 3%].The test results obtained are as follows:

(


12/34

12

18. As per the drive test report, most of the operators have shown improvement inQoS benchmark for blocked call rate.

C. Retainability

19. TRAI has laid down the QoS benchmarks for call drop rate to be less

than2%. The test results obtained for this parameter are:

(=95%)

(>=95%)

15 15 15

84.62% 83.78% 61.87%

87.39% 87.44% 78.33%

83.62% 86.14% 62.00%

85.84% 86.43% 74.48%

97.44% 95.64%

75.66%

96.96% 97.10%

97.26% 95.10%

87.96% 84.87%

85.16% 92.78%

22. As per the drive test report, the results are similar to the earlier tests .


13/34

1 3


n a l y s i s

1 5

4 3 5

5 1 5

4 5 5

5 1 1

5 1

3

4 8 7

4 7 6

4 9 7

5 0 3

5 1 3

5 5 4

4 5 1

4 5 1

4 8 1

1 5

5 1 3

5 3 3

5 3

8

4 6 4

5 1 6

3 6 0

5 0 2

5 0 0

5 3 8

( < 3 % )

1 5

2 . 9 9 %

3 . 5 0 %

1 . 3 2 %

4 . 8 9 %

4 . 4 8 %

4 . 9 3 %

2 . 3 1 %

0 . 2 0 %

0 . 6 0 %

4 . 0 9 %

0 . 1 8 %

3 . 7 7 %

4 . 4 3 %

3 . 5 3 %

1 5

1 0 . 1 4

%

1 8 . 7 6 %

3 . 7 2 %

1 0 . 5 6 %

1 . 9 4 %

1 . 1 1 %

1 . 0 0 %

4 . 6 0 %

2 . 7 9 %

( > = 9 5 % )

1 5

9 7 . 0 1

%

9 6 . 5 0 %

9 8 . 6 8 %

9 5 . 1 1 %

9 5 . 5

2 %

9 5 . 0 7 %

9 7 . 6 9 %

9 9 . 8 0 %

9 9 . 4 0 %

9 5 . 9 1 %

9 9 . 8 2

%

9 6

. 2 3 %

9 5 . 5 7

%

9 6 . 4 7 %

1 5

8 9 . 8 6

%

8 1 . 2 4 %

9 6 . 2

8 %

8 9 . 4 4 %

9 8 . 0 6 %

9 8 . 8 9 %

9 9 . 0 0

%

9 5

. 4 0 %

9 7 . 0 3

%

( < = 2 % )

1 5

2 . 6 1 %

3 . 2 2 %

3 . 7 9 %

2 . 0 6 %

3 . 8 8 %

8 . 8 6 %

4 . 5 2 %

1 . 4 1 %

2 . 0 0 %

2 . 4 4 %

0 . 1 8 %

6 . 6 8 %

8 . 5 8 %

2 . 5 9 %

1 5

2 . 6 0 %

1 . 8 5 %

5 . 6 0 %

0 . 4 8 %

1 . 5 8 %

2 . 8 1 %

2 . 0 1 %

2 . 3 1 %

2 . 4 9 %

( > = 9 5 % )

1 5

8 4 . 6 2

%

6 1 . 8 7 %

8 7 . 3 9 %

7 8 . 3 3 %

8 3 . 6

2 %

6 2 . 0 0 %

8 5 . 8 4 %

9 7 . 4 4 %

9 6 . 9 6 %

7 4 . 4 8 %

9 7 . 2 6

%

8 7

. 9 6 %

8 5 . 1 6

%

7 5 . 6 6 %

1 5

8 3 . 7 8

%

8 7 . 4 4 %

8 6 . 1

4 %

8 6 . 4 3 %

9 5 . 6 4 %

9 7 . 1 0 %

9 5 . 1 0

%

8 4

. 8 7 %

9 2 . 7 8

%

1 5

9 8 . 2 5

%

9 7 . 8 2 %

9 5 . 6 3 %

9 6 . 4 9 %

9 3 . 1

6 %

9 2 . 8 6 %

9 8 . 2 2 %

1 0 0 . 0 0 %

1 0 0 . 0 0 %

9 8 . 9 5 %

1 0 0 . 0 0

%

9 5

. 8 6 %

9 7 . 1 5

%

9 7 . 2 5 %

1 5

9 5 . 8 7

%

9 8 . 0 3 %

9 6 . 4

6 %

9 8 . 8 4 %

1 0 0 . 0 0 %

1 0 0 . 0 0 %

1 0 0 . 0 0

%

9 4

. 6 6 %

9 7 . 9 0

%

2 3 .

T h e c o m p a r i s

o n o f t h e D r i v e t e s t r e s u l t s r e v e a l e d t h a t m o s t o f t h e

o p e r a t o r s w e r e n o t a b l e t o i m p r o v e t h e

n e t w o r k q u a l i t y .

.


14/34

14

Target Network in Pune :

PUNE

28 to 30 Dec' 15

Pune

300 Km

31.24 L (Census 2011)

700 Km Sq.

Drive tests were conducted for 15 Networks in the City:

Drive Test Route

1. The total Drive test route covered was approximately 300 kms. The map below

depicts the route that was followed during the Pune Drive test.


15/34

15

A. RF Coverage rate

2. The test results obtained in Pune on the drive test route (approx. 300 km) are

as follows:

%

15

%

15

%

15 2 80.19% 83.15% 3 76.75%

2 76.46% 80.59% 3 64.77%

2 96.19% 93.08% 3 53.83%

2 95.58% 97.32% 3 50.52%

2 64.99% 69.21% 3 89.10%

2 86.04% 93.79%

2 93.55%

2 96.19% 97.74%

100.00%

99.98%

3. As per the drive test report, the coverage for most of the operators have not

improved.

B. Accessibility

4. The test results obtained are as follows:

(


16/34

16

C. Retainability

6. The test results obtained for this parameter are:

(=95%)

15 15 15

2 83.74% 89.36% 3 66.26%

2 85.72% 92.28% 3 64.10%

2 75.42% 87.08% 3 63.58%

2 77.49% 89.37% 3 58.84%

2 82.69% 91.72% 3 68.48%

2 87.81% 93.05%

2 72.30%

2 78.99% 89.23%

85.41%

93.82%

9. As per the drive test report, none of the operators are meeting the

prescribed benchmark, and there is deterioration in voice quality.


17/34

1 7


n a l y s i s

1 0 .

T h e r e s u l t s o f

t h e K e y P e r f o r m a n c e I n d i c a t

o r s a r e s u m m a r i s e d i n t h e t a b l e b e l o w : -

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

3

3

3

3

3

1 5

3 6 8

3 3 4

2 8 8

3 0 6

3 2 6

3 3 1

3 0 4

3 6 0

3 1 1

3 0 6

3 3 5

3 0 5

3 4 6

3 2 4

3 1 6

1 5

4 6 5

4 7 8

4 6 7

5 1 9

4 6 4

4 7 4

4 6 4

( < 3 % )

1 5

1 6 . 3 0 %

8 . 0

8 %

5 . 2 1 %

5 . 2 3 %

4 . 6 0 %

1 2 . 9 9

%

4 . 6 1 %

1 6 . 6 7 %

2 . 5 7 %

1 . 9 6 %

1 7 . 0 1

%

4 . 2 6 %

1 5 . 9 0

%

3 6 . 7 3

%

1 0 . 7 6 %

1 5

5 . 8 1 %

2 . 9

3 %

4 . 5 0 %

1 . 9 3 %

7 . 1 1 %

5 . 4 9 %

3 . 6 6 %

( > = 9 5 % )

1 5

8 3 . 7 0 %

9 1 . 9 2 %

9 4 . 7 9

%

9 4 . 7 7

%

9 5 . 4 0 %

8 7 . 0 1

%

9 5 . 3 9

%

8 3 . 3 3 %

9 7 . 4 3

%

9 8 . 0 4 %

8 2 . 9 9

%

9 5 . 7 4

%

8 4 . 1 0

%

6 3 . 2 7

%

8 9 . 2 4 %

1 5

9 4 . 1 9 %

9 7 . 0 7 %

9 6 . 5 0

%

9 9 . 0 7

%

9 2 . 8 9 %

9 4 . 5 1

%

9 6 . 3 4 %

( < = 2 % )

1 5

1 3 . 9 6 %

3 . 9

1 %

1 5 . 7 5

%

1 8 . 9 7

%

1 1 . 5 8 %

1 1 . 4 6

%

1 4 . 4 8

%

1 2 . 6 7 %

1 4 . 8 5

%

5 . 6 7 %

7 . 9 1 %

1 1 . 6 4

%

2 0 . 9 6

%

4 2 . 9 3

%

5 . 6 7 %

1 5

2 . 7 4 %

1 . 5

1 %

5 . 7 8 %

1 . 5 8 %

3 . 2 6 %

2 . 7 0 %

3 . 3 6 %

( > = 9 5 % )

1 5

8 3 . 7 4 %

8 5 . 7 2 %

7 5 . 4 2

%

7 7 . 4 9

%

8 2 . 6 9 %

8 7 . 8 1

%

7 2 . 3 0

%

7 8 . 9 9 %

8 5 . 4 1

%

9 3 . 8 2 %

6 6 . 2 6

%

6 4 . 1 0

%

6 3 . 5 8

%

5 8 . 8 4

%

6 8 . 4 8 %

1 5

8 9 . 3 6 %

9 2 . 2 8 %

8 7 . 0 8

%

8 9 . 3 7

%

9 1 . 7 2 %

9 3 . 0 5

%

8 9 . 2 3 %

1 1 .

T h e

D r i v e

t e s t

r e s u l t s

r e v e a l e d t

h a t

m o s t

o f

t h e

o p e r

a t o r s

p e r f o r m a n c e

h a s

d e t e r i o r a t e d


18/34

18

Target Network in Surat:

SURAT

21th- 22th& 23 Dec' 15

Surat

300 Km

44.7 L (Census 2011)

326.515 Km Sq.

Drive tests were conducted for 13 Networks in the City :

Drive Test Route


depicts the route that was followed during the Surat Drive test.

A. RF Coverage rate

2. The test results obtained in Surat on the drive test route (approx. 300 km) are

as follows:


19/34

19

% 15 % 15 % 15

95.65% 90.72% 3 68.68%

97.81% 98.73% 3 93.44%

100.00% 3 71.81%

100.00% 3 91.56%

71.84% 21.69%

100.00%

2 89.19% 78.47%

93.66%

97.52% 89.80%

3. As per the drive test report, the coverage for some of the operators have

improved.

B. Accessibility


(=95%)

15 15 15 15

2 5.00% 22.43% 95.00% 77.57%

2 5.51% 21.28% 94.49% 78.72%

1.04% 98.96%

1.79% 98.21%

2 12.60% 18.39% 87.40% 81.61% 2.77% 97.23%

2 10.69% 27.00% 89.31% 73.00%

2 9.06% 90.94%

2 8.59% 2.37% 91.41% 97.63%

3 9.32% 90.68%

3 8.57% 91.43%

3 10.26% 89.74%

3 8.37% 91.63%

5. As per the drive test report, most of the operators have shown improvement.

C. Retainability



20/34


21/34

2 1


n a l y s i s

1 0 .




1 1 .

T h e

D r i v e

t e s t

r e s u l t s

r e v e a l e d

t h a t

m o s t

o f

t h e

o p

e r a t o r s

h a v e

m a r g i n a l l y

i m p r o v e d .

2

2

2

2

2

2

3

3

3

3

1 5

2 8 0

2 5 4

2 8 9

2 7 9

2 4 6

2 5 3

2 9 0

2 7 6

2 9 1

2 7 9

2 1 0

2 3 4

2 5 1

1 5

2 6 3

3 4 3

2 6 1

3 3 7

2 5 3

( < 3 % )

1 5

5 . 0 0 %

5 . 5 1 %

1 . 0 4 %

1 . 7 9 %

1

2 . 6 0 %

2 . 7 7 %

1 0 . 6 9 %

9 . 0

6 %

8 . 5 9 %

9 . 3 2 %

8 . 5 7 %

1 0 . 2 6 %

8 . 3 7 %

1 5

2 2 . 4 3 %

2 1 . 2 8 %

1

8 . 3 9 %

2 7 . 0 0 %

2 . 3 7 %

( > = 9 5 % )

1 5

9 5 . 0 0 %

9 4 . 4 9 %

9 8 . 9 6 %

9 8 . 2 1 %

8

7 . 4 0 %

9 7 . 2 3 %

8 9 . 3 1 %

9 0 . 9 4 %

9 1 . 4 1 %

9 0 . 6 8 %

9 1 . 4 3

%

8 9 . 7 4 %

9 1 . 6 3 %

1 5

7 7 . 5 7 %

7 8 . 7 2 %

8

1 . 6 1 %

7 3 . 0 0 %

9 7 . 6 3 %

( < = 2 % )

1 5

4 . 1 4 %

8 . 3 3 %

5 . 5 9 %

4 . 3 8 %

6 . 5 1 %

0 . 8 1 %

6 . 9 5 %

6 . 3

7 %

7 . 1 4 %

9 . 4 9 %

1 0 . 9 4

%

7 . 1 4 %

4 . 3 5 %

1 5

2 . 0 3 %

0 . 7 4 %

3

8 . 9 7 %

2 . 8 5 %

1 . 6 2 %

( > = 9 5 % )

1 5

8 7 . 0 2 %

8 4 . 6 3 %

9 0 . 5 9 %

8 9 . 4 9 %

8

3 . 6 7 %

9 3 . 9 0 %

9 0 . 2 9 %

8 0 . 4 9 %

5 1 . 8 3 %

6 5 . 6 7 %

5 9 . 0 0

%

2 5 . 1 3 %

6 8 . 4 8 %

1 5

8 8 . 6 5 %

8 7 . 6 8 %

7

4 . 8 2 %

8 8 . 7 5 %

8 8 . 6 8 %


22/34


23/34

23

A. RF Coverage rate

2. The test results obtained in Indore on the drive test route (approx. 320 km) are

as follows:

% %

94.21% 3 91.58%

95.01% 3 69.00%

98.54% 3 89.46%

93.95% 3 76.17%

96.54% 3 85.00%

92.70%

91.97%

94.19%

91.21%

3. As per the drive test report, the coverage of most of the operators are above

90%.

B. Accessibility


(=95%)

(=95%)

5.01% 94.99% 3 1.90% 98.10%

3.49% 96.51% 3 5.56% 94.44%

2.57% 97.43% 3 2.39% 97.61%

1.63% 98.37% 3 11.56% 88.44%

10.89% 89.11% 3 7.53% 92.47%

0.99% 99.01%

4.82% 95.18%

7.45% 92.55%

1.58% 98.42%

As per the drive test report, some of the operators have shown improvement.


24/34

24

C. Retainability


(=95%)

83.78% 3 87.44%

86.14% 3 86.43%

95.64% 3 95.64%

95.64% 3 95.64%

95.64% 3 95.10%

97.10%

90.70%

84.87%

92.78%

8. As per the drive test report, some of the operators are meeting the

prescribed benchmark


25/34

2 5


n a l y s i s

9 .




3

3

3

3

3

3 7 9

4 2 0

4 0 1

3 7 8

3 7 8

3 7 6

4 2 9

4 0 4

3 9 8

4 0 6

3 5 3

3 7 2

4 7 0

3 7 9

( < 3 % )

5 . 0 1 %

1 . 9 0 %

3 . 4 9 %

5 . 5 6 %

2 . 5 7 %

2 . 3 9 %

1 . 6 3 %

1 0 . 8 9 %

1 1 . 5 6 %

0 . 9 9 %

4 . 8 2 %

7 . 5 3 %

7 . 4 5 %

1 . 5 8 %

( > = 9 5 % )

9 4 . 9 9 %

9 8 . 1 0 %

9 6

. 5 1 %

9 4 . 4 4 %

9 7 . 4 3 %

9 7 . 6 1 %

9 8 . 3 7 %

8 9 . 1 1 %

8 8 . 4 4 %

9 9 . 0 1 %

9 5 . 1 8 %

9 2 . 4 7 %

9 2 . 5 5 %

9 8 . 4 2 %

(

< = 2 % )

1 . 5 8 %

2 . 6 2 %

2 . 4 9 %

5 . 5 6 %

5 . 4 0 %

3 . 7 2 %

1 . 6 3 %

3 . 2 2 %

5 . 0 3 %

1 . 2 3 %

5 . 1 0 %

2 . 4 2 %

2 . 3 4 %

1 . 8 5 %

( > = 9 5 % )

8 3 . 7 8 %

8 7 . 4 4 %

8 6

. 1 4 %

8 6 . 4 3 %

9 5 . 6 4 %

9 5 . 6 4 %

9 5 . 6 4 %

9 5 . 6 4 %

9 5 . 6 4 %

9 7 . 1 0 %

9 0 . 7 0 %

9 5 . 1 0 %

8 4 . 8 7 %

9 2 . 7 8 %

1 0 .

T h e D r i v e t e s

t r e s u l t s r e v e a l e d t h a t m o s t o f t h e o p e r a t o r s a r e n o t

m e e t i n g t h e b e n c h m a r k s i n p a r a m e t e r s

l i k e d r o p p e d c a l l r a t e , C S S R e t c .


26/34

26

Target Network in Bhubaneswar:

Bhubaneswar

28th &30th Dec' 15

Orissa

450 Kilometres


Drive Test Route


depicts the route that was followed during the Bhubaneswar Drive test.


27/34

27

A. RF Coverage rate

2. The test results obtained in Bhubaneswar on the drive test route (approx. 450

km) are as follows:

% 15

%

15 %

2 68.04% 72.13% 3 47.74%

2 86.72% 91.33% 3 56.68%

2 89.90% 90.23% 3 46.89%

2 70.79% 81.30%

58.43% 59.00%

85.93% 67.33%

2 74.27% 78.77%

2 79.41% 79.47%

3. As per the drive test report, the coverage for most of the operators are

almost the same.

B. Accessibility


(=95%)

(=95

%)

15 15 15 15 151

5

7.76% 6.36% 92.24% 93.64% 8.36%91.64

%

7.93% 3.54% 92.07% 96.46% 11.41%88.59

%

15.46% 1.77% 84.54% 98.23% 7.97%92.03

%

7.02% 4.68% 92.98% 95.32%

4.80% 3.56% 95.20% 96.44% 12.26% 10.17% 87.74% 89.83%

10.56% 9.28% 89.44% 90.72%

2.12% 6.51% 97.88% 93.49%

5. As per the drive test report, performance of most of the operators has

deteriorated.


28/34

28

C. Retainability


(=95%)

15 15 15 85.68% 84.45% 58.61%

86.60% 88.37% 71.19%

80.00% 86.23% 73.53%

80.35% 81.66%

86.52% 87.59%

84.46% 87.77%

86.55% 89.00%

88.72% 91.63%

9. As per the drive test report, none of the operators are meeting the

prescribed benchmark and in most of the cases no improvement has been made

in the performance.


29/34

2 9


n a l y s i s

1 0 .




1 5

3 4 8

3 4 7

3 5 3

3 6 8

4 8 5

3 6 4

3 5 6

3 3 3

4 1 6

3 6 0

3 3 0

1 5

3 4 7

3 3 4

3 3 7

3 5 9

2 7 4

3 0 9

3 4 1

3 3 9

( < 3 % )

1 5

7 . 7 6 %

8 . 3 6 %

7 . 9

3 %

1 1 . 4 1 %

1 5 . 4 6 %

7 . 9 7

%

7 . 0 2 %

4 . 8 0 %

1 2 . 2 6 %

1 0 . 5 6 %

2 . 1 2 %

1 5

6 . 3 6 %

3 . 5

4 %

1 . 7 7 %

4 . 6 8 %

3 . 5 6 %

1 0 . 1 7 %

9 . 2 8 %

6 . 5 1 %

( > = 9 5 % )

1 5

9 2 . 2 4 %

9 1 . 6 4 %

9 2 .

0 7 %

8 8 . 5 9 %

8 4 . 5 4 %

9 2 . 0 3 %

9 2 . 9 8 %

9 5 . 2 0 %

8 7 . 7 4 %

8 9 . 4 4 %

9 7 . 8 8 %

1 5

9 3 . 6 4 %

9 6 .

4 6 %

9 8 . 2 3 %

9 5 . 3 2 %

9 6 . 4 4 %

8 9 . 8 3 %

9 0 . 7 2 %

9 3 . 4 9 %

( < = 2 % )

1 5

7 . 4 8 %

9 . 7 5 %

6 . 7

7 %

7 . 0 6 %

4 . 6 3 %

7 . 4 6

%

7 . 5 5 %

8 . 5 2 %

8 . 4 9 %

6 . 8 3 %

4 . 0 2 %

1 5

6 . 2 9 %

2 . 0

1 %

4 . 5 9 %

0 . 9 5 %

9 . 2 2 %

6 . 8 0 %

1 . 2 9 %

3 . 3 9 %

( > = 9 5 % )

1 5

8 5 . 6 8 %

5 8 . 6 1 %

8 6 .

6 0 %

7 1 . 1 9 %

8 0 . 0 0 %

7 3 . 5 3 %

8 0 . 3 5 %

8 6 . 5 2 %

8 4 . 4 6 %

8 6 . 5 5 %

8 8 . 7 2 %

1 5

8 4 . 4 5 %

8 8 .

3 7 %

8 6 . 2 3 %

8 1 . 6 6 %

8 7 . 5 9 %

8 7 . 7 7 %

8 9 . 0 0 %

9 1 . 6 3 %

1 1 .


t r e s u l t s r e v e a l e d t h a t t h e r e i s n o i m p r o v e m e n t i n m o s t o f t h e c a s e s .


30/34

30

Target Network in New Delhi:

()

1800 5036

900+1800 6051

900+1800 6034

1800 2470

1800 4020

900 1127

800 1476

800 892

800 1047


Drive Test Route12. The total Drive test route covered was approximately 600 kms. The map below

depicts the route that was followed during the Delhi Drive test.


31/34

RF Coverage rate

13. The test results obtai

as follows:

KPI C

AIRTEL 2G

AIRCEL 2G

IDEA 2G

VODAFONE 2G

RCOM 2G

MTNL 2GAIRTEL 3G

IDEA 3G

VODAFONE 3G

RCOM 3G

MTNL 3G

RELIANCE CDMA

TATA CDMA

MTS CDMA

14. As per the drive test

improved.

B. Accessibility

15. The test results obtain

KPI

BlockedCallRate(Jan-16)

BlockedCallRate(Jan-16)

BlockedCallRate(Sep-15)

ed in Delhi on the drive test route (appro

verage% Jan-16 Coverage % Sept - 15 Cover

88.44% 87.75% 91.26

93.98% 85.97% 74.32

92.13% 92.74% 87.42

90.11% 84.35% 87.29%

81.39% 51.53% 57.96%

82.20% - -89.70% - -

71.25% - -

82.58% - -

65.22% - -

59.43% - -

95.66% - -

93.41% 82.75% 58.07

94.50% - -

report, the coverage for most of the o

ed are as follows:

BlockedCallRate(Jul-15)

CSSR(Accessibility)(Jan-16) - 300KMs

CSSR(Accessibility)(Jan-16) - 600KMs

CSS(Acc(SepKMs

31

x. 600 km) are

age % June -15

perators have

Ressibility)-15) - 300

CSSR(Accessibility(Jul-15) - 300KMs


32/34

32

16. As per the drive test report, some of the operators have shown improvement.

C. Retainability


KPIDropped CallRate (Jan-16) -300 KMs

Dropped CallRate (Jan-16) -600 KMs

Dropped Call Rate(Sep-15) - 300 KMs

Dropped Call Rate (Jul-15)- 300 KMs

Benchmark ≤ 2%

Airtel 2G 1.43% 1.41% 6.58% 8.04%

Airtel 3G 1.36% 1.58% N.A. N.A.

Aircel 2G 2.40% 2.63% 9.13% 5.18%

Idea 2G 1.59% 2.06% 0.94% 2.84%

Idea 3G 0.95% 1.69% N.A. N.A.

Vodafone2G 3.49% 3.87% 4.74% 4.28%

Vodafone 3G 0.74% 1.36% N.A. N.A.

Reliance GSM 2G 2.05% 2.96% 1.75% 17.29%

Reliance GSM 3G 2.97% 4.54% N.A. N.A.

MTNL 2G 7.86% 9.49% N.A. N.A.

MTNL 3G 4.78% 6.92% N.A. N.A.

Reliance CDMA 4.64% 4.06% N.A. N.A.

TTSL CDMA 2.69% 5.02% 1.50% 0.84%

MTS CDMA 3.98% 3.28% N.A. N.A.

18. As per the drive test report, some of the operators have shown

- 300KMs

- 600KMs

- 300KMs

- 300KMs

Benchmark ≤ 3% ≥ 95%

Airtel 2G 0.81% 0.60% 3.53% 8.18% 99.19% 99.40% 96.47% 91.82%

Airtel 3G 3.08% 1.99% N.A. N.A. 96.92% 98.01% N.A. N.A.Aircel 2G 0.86% 0.83% 5.45% 2.95% 99.14% 99.17% 94.55% 97.05%Idea 2G 0.59% 0.39% 3.65% 26.09% 99.41% 99.61% 96.35% 73.91%

Idea 3G 0.70% 1.55% N.A. N.A. 99.30% 98.45% N.A. N.A.

Vodafone2G 0.41% 0.88% 2.60% 4.69% 99.59% 99.12% 97.40% 95.31%Vodafone 3G 2.16% 2.18% N.A. N.A. 97.84% 97.82% N.A. N.A.RelianceGSM 2G

1.42% 3.07% 4.08% 10.45% 98.58% 96.93% 95.92% 89.55%

RelianceGSM 3G

4.04% 7.03% N.A. N.A. 95.96% 92.97% N.A. N.A.

MTNL 2G 27.59% 24.81% N.A. N.A. 72.41% 75.19% N.A. N.A.

MTNL 3G 18.61% 23.65% N.A. N.A. 81.39% 76.35% N.A. N.A.RelianceCDMA

1.85% 1.11% N.A. N.A. 98.15% 98.89% N.A. N.A.

TTSL CDMA 5.44% 2.66% 2.28% 1.11% 94.56% 97.34% 97.72% 98.89%MTS CDMA 2.53% 2.16% N.A. N.A. 97.47% 97.84% N.A. N.A.


33/34

33

improvements.

E. Rx Quality

19. The Rx Quality for the operators are as shown in the table below:

KPIRx Quality % (Jan-16) - 600 KMs

Rx Quality % (Sep-15) - 300 KMs

Rx Quality % (Jul-15) - 300 KMs

BenchmarkAirtel 2G 94.64% 87.59% 84.32%

Airtel 3G 94.87% N.A. N.A.

Aircel 2G 92.28% 89.14% 82.69%

Idea 2G 93.89% 94.33% 91.12%

Idea 3G 90.04% N.A. N.A.

odafone2G 93.38% 92.89% 90.67%

Vodafone 3G 88.50% N.A. N.A.

Reliance GSM 2G 87.20% 88.53% 85.36%

Reliance GSM 3G 94.99% N.A. N.A.

MTNL 2G 91.22% N.A. N.A.

MTNL 3G 97.80% N.A. N.A.

Reliance CDMA 81.77% N.A. N.A.

TTSL CDMA 85.17% 98.59% 99.68%

MTS CDMA 83.91% N.A. N.A.

20. As per the drive test report, except MTNL 3G none of the operators are

meeting the prescribed benchmark


34/34

3 4


n a l y s i s

1 .




A i r c e l

I d e a

V o d a f o n e

R e l i a n c e G S M

M T N L

R e l i

a n c e

C D

M A

T T S L

C D M A

M T S

C D M A

3 G

2 G

2 G

3 G

2 G

3 G

2 G

3 G

2 G

3 G

m p t ( J a n - 1 6 ) -

9 0 5

9 5 9

1 0 2 2

8 4 1

1 0 1 7

8 2 4

1 0 1 0

8 5 3

1 2 0 5

8 7 1

1 1

7 2

1 1 6 7

1 2 4 8

m p t ( S e p - 1 5 ) -

N . A

.

4 5 9

5 4 8

N . A .

5 7 6

N . A .

5 1 5

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

6 1 3

N . A .

m p t ( J u l - 1 5 ) -

N . A

.

4 4 1

7 8 2

N . A .

4 9 0

N . A .

6 0 3

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

7 2 3

N . A .

C a l l R a t e ( J a n -

K M s

1 . 9 9

%

0 . 8

3 %

0 . 3

9 %

1 . 5

5 %

0 . 8

8 %

2 . 1

8 %

3 . 0

7 %

7 . 0

3 %

2 4 . 8

1 %

2 3 . 6

5 %

1 . 1

1 %

2 . 6

6 %

2 . 1

6 %

C a l l R a t e ( S e p -

K M s

N . A

.

5 . 4

5 %

3 . 6

5 %

N . A .

2 . 6

0 %

N . A .

4 . 0

8 %

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

2 . 2

8 %

N . A .

C a l l R a t e ( J u l -

K M s

N . A

.

2 . 9

5 %

2 6 . 0

9 %

N . A .

4 . 6

9 %

N . A .

1 0 . 4

5 %

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

1 . 1

1 %

N . A .

c c e s s i b i l i t y )

- 6 0 0 K M s

9 8 . 0 1

%

9 9 . 1

7 %

9 9 . 6

1 %

9 8 . 4

5 %

9 9 . 1

2 %

9 7 . 8

2 %

9 6 . 9

3 %

9

2 . 9

7 %

7 5 . 1

9 %

7 6 . 3

5 %

9 8 . 8 9 %

9 7 . 3

4 %

9 7 . 8

4 %


- 3 0 0 K M s

N . A

.

9 4 . 5

5 %

9 6 . 3

5 %

N . A .

9 7 . 4

0 %

N . A .

9 5 . 9

2 %

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

9 7 . 7

2 %

N . A .


3 0 0 K M s

N . A

.

9 7 . 0

5 %

7 3 . 9

1 %

N . A .

9 5 . 3

1 %

N . A .

8 9 . 5

5 %

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

9 8 . 8

9 %

N . A .

C a l l R a t e ( J a n -

K M s

1 . 5 8

%

2 . 6

3 %

2 . 0

6 %

1 . 6

9 %

3 . 8

7 %

1 . 3

6 %

2 . 9

6 %

4 . 5

4 %

9 . 4

9 %

6 . 9

2 %

4 . 0

6 %

5 . 0

2 %

3 . 2

8 %

C a l l R a t e ( S e p -

K M s

N . A

.

9 . 1

3 %

0 . 9

4 %

N . A .

4 . 7

4 %

N . A .

1 . 7

5 %

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

1 . 5

0 %

N . A .

C a l l R a t e ( J u l -

K M s

N . A

.

5 . 1

8 %

2 . 8

4 %

N . A .

4 . 2

8 %

N . A .

1 7 . 2

9 %

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

0 . 8

4 %

N . A .

t y % (

0 - 5 ) ( J a n -

K M s

9 4 . 8 7

%

9 2 . 2

8 %

9 3 . 8

9 %

9 0 . 0

4 %

9 3 . 3

8 %

8 8 . 5

0 %

8 7 . 2

0 %

9

4 . 9

9 %

9 1 . 2

2 %

9 7 . 8

0 %

8 1 . 7 7 %

8 5 . 1

7 %

8 3 . 9

1 %

t y % (

0 - 5 ) ( S e p -

K M s

N . A

.

8 9 . 1

4 %

9 4 . 3

3 %

N . A .

9 2 . 8

9 %

N . A .

8 8 . 5

3 %

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

9 8 . 5

9 %

N . A .

t y % (

0 - 5 ) ( J u l -

K M s

N . A

.

8 2 . 6

9 %

9 1 . 1

2 %

N . A .

9 0 . 6

7 %

N . A .

8 5 . 3

6 %

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

N . A .

9 9 . 6

8 %

N . A .

2 .


t r e s u l t s r e v e a l e d t h a t p e r f o r m a n c e o f m o s t o f t h e o p

e r a t o r s h a v e i m p r o v e d .

executive summary drive

Documents