examiner interviews best p ractices
DESCRIPTION
Examiner Interviews Best P ractices. Interview Time FY 2008 – FY 2013 . 23,503 hours in FY 2013, compared with 21,273 hours in FY 2012. 6,651 interview hours in FY 13 have been charged through the AFCP program. Influence of Interviews on Compliance Rate. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Examiner Interviews Best Practices
2
23,503 hours in FY 2013, compared with 21,273 hours in FY 2012. 6,651 interview hours in FY 13 have been charged through the AFCP program.
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
110,000
120,000
130,000
140,000
150,000
160,000
170,000
180,000
October November December January February March April May June July August September
Hour
s
20 08 20 09 20 10 20 11 20 12 20 13
Interview TimeFY 2008 – FY 2013
In-pro
cess C
omplia
nce Rate
with In
tervie
w
In-pro
cess C
omplia
nce Rate
withou
t Inter
view
Allowan
ce Com
pliance
Rate with
Inter
view
Allowan
ce Com
pliance
Rate with
out In
tervie
w90%91%92%93%94%95%96%97%98%99%
100%
95.1%
93.3%
97.4%96.3%
% C
ompl
ianc
e R
ate
12/3/12
Influence of Interviews on Compliance Rate
Based on random samples of over 28,000 Allowances and Final Rejections from FY 2008 – FY 2012
• Useful content of a detailed Agenda may include: General intent and/or goal of interview Brief summary of arguments (if applicable) Applied references Evidence relied upon Proposed amendments
• Not submitting an agenda is not a valid reason to deny an interview
• Review the application history including the prior art
• Understand the inventive concept
• Identify allowable subject matter where appropriate
• Be prepared to explain position of previous action
Interview Preparation
5
Recordation of Interviews• Use the appropriate Interview Summary form and fill out completely
• Attach agenda and any items (including proposed amendments) provided for the interview
• Be specifics regarding issues discussed
• Clearly document all agreements
• Agreement can be reached for various issues, such as allowability, interpretation of claim limitations, priority dates, application of case law, next steps to be taken, statutory subject matter, etc.
• Make sure the record is complete
Next Steps
66
• Clarify Agreements Record Specific Issues Resolved Note Any Interpretations Agreed Upon Identify Allowable Subject Matter, if any Record Specific Claim Language Specify What Prior Art is Overcome
• Commit to Specific Steps & Assign responsibility Examiner steps, for example:
- Consult with Subject Matter Expert- Perform Update Search
Applicant steps, for example:- Consult with Applicant- File Response
• Provide Clear Timeline & Follow-Up
7
Interview Webpage
• Telephonic interviewso in 2011, 164 cases interviewed, both first and final
OAs 27% cases had next action allowances
• In-person interviewso 20 cases interviewed in person over a 4 day period
5 allowances 1 abandoned 1 notice of appeal 6 RCEs 4 new office actions 3 awaiting next action
Interview Statistics
Faster resolution of issues, allowance of applications
Improved patent quality ◦ USPTO recently analyzed correlation between
patent quality and whether an interview was conducted
◦ “The data shows that interviews help decrease both improper allowances and improper rejections by approximately 40 percent compared to applications without interviews prior to the final disposition.”
Benefits of Examiner Interviews
Director Kappos’ Public Blog, January 15, 2013
Discuss possible ways of overcoming rejections without creating extensive file history that can be exploited during litigation◦ Find out if the examiner thinks there is
allowable subject matter◦ Find out if the examiner has problems that have
not been stated in the written record and that can be easily addressed
Benefits of Examiner Interviews
Introduce the examiner to the inventor(s)◦ Many examiners have science and engineering
backgrounds, and may appreciate discussing the technology with an inventor and feel more personally connected to the case after meeting him or her
◦ The inventor is likely in a better position to explain the nuances of the technology
Benefits of Examiner Interviews
Develop a rapport with the examiner◦ Establish credibility and trust◦ Get more assistance during prosecution◦ You may have many other applications with the
same examiner
Benefits of Examiner Interviews
Understand the psychology and perspective of examiners in general◦ Examiners are just doing their jobs – don’t make
it personal Always be professional and courteous
◦ Some examiners feel underpaid and underappreciated A little bit of respect can go a long way
Strategies for Successful Interviews
Understand the psychology and perspective of examiners in general◦ Many examiners are not attorneys
They generally do not view the examination process as adversarial, so don’t treat it that way
Unless there are glaring legal errors in the rejections, it may be better to focus the arguments on the technology, e.g., explain distinctions from the prior art
It is more effective to cite legal principles from the M.P.E.P. rather than case law
Strategies for Successful Interviews
Understand the psychology and perspective of examiners in general◦ Examiners work under significant time constraints
Don’t expect as much time investment by the examiner after FAOM, and especially after-final
Interview after FAOM, not after-final Propose solutions that will make their jobs easier,
e.g., narrowing amendments, CONS
Strategies for Successful Interviews
Understand the psychology and perspective of examiners in general◦ Examiners work under significant time
constraints Don’t pile on weak arguments – annoying for the
examiner, and makes it easier for the examiner to focus on the weakest arguments
Strategies for Successful Interviews
Understand the particular examiner on your application ◦ Is the examiner new and still learning?◦ Has the examiner made an honest mistake?◦ Is the examiner just being unreasonable?
Strategies for Successful Interviews
Thorough preparation is essential◦ Don’t waste valuable time during the interview◦ Must have complete knowledge of the file
history, cited references, and relevant law◦ Think through all possible
arguments/counterarguments
Strategies for Successful Interviews
Thorough preparation is essential◦ Mock interviews can be useful to explore how
different arguments may play out, and identify potential weaknesses
◦ Have multiple fallback positions and possible claim amendments ready so that you can respond to whatever course the interview takes
Strategies for Successful Interviews
Listen to the examiner, ask questions, and create a dialogue◦ Don’t just lecture
Bring an inventor◦ Often useful to help explain the technology and
establish a rapport◦ But generally not a good idea to allow the
inventor to discuss the legal issues, unless he or she is qualified
Strategies for Successful Interviews
Preparing an agenda◦ Provide the examiner with enough information
to be prepared to cover all the issues you want to
◦ But don’t provide too many details, so that you have some flexibility in the interview, and in case the agenda is made part of the official record
Timing of the interview◦ After FAOM◦ A few weeks out from end of a quarter, but not
end of quarter
Strategies for Successful Interviews
Questions?