examination of brassicaceae seed meal as a soil amendment to control pythium ultimum in tomato (...

20
Examination of Brassicaceae seed meal as a soil amendment to control Pythium ultimum in tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) and pepper (Capsicum annuum) production systems. MAXWELL HANDISENI Plant, Soil and Entomological Sciences Idaho OilSeed Conference 2009

Post on 21-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Examination of Brassicaceae seed meal as a soil amendment to control Pythium ultimum in

tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) and pepper (Capsicum annuum)

production systems.

MAXWELL HANDISENIPlant, Soil and Entomological

SciencesIdaho OilSeed Conference 2009

Outline

Introduction Materials and

Methods Results Conclusion

Introduction Tomato and peppers among most

valuable vegetables. Traditional soil borne disease

management relied heavily on chemicals.

Brassicaceae material associated with soil borne disease suppression.

Glucosinolate products responsible. Variability of glucosinolate type and

content.

Glucosinolate Breakdown

S-C6H11O5

R – C

NOSO-3

S -

R – C

N -

+ Glucose

+ HSO-4

R-N=C=S Isothiocyana

te

R-CN Nitrile & Sulfur

R-S-CN Thiocyanate

H2O

Myrosinases

Type B. napus B. juncea S. alba

Allyl - 300.9 -

3-But 34.4 1.3 -

4-Pent 8.4 0.1 -

2-Hyd-3-But 75.4 0.1 8.5

OH-Benz - - 235.6

Total 114.2 302.9 244.1

Glucosinolate Profiles

Materials and Methods

Materials and Methods

Three meals examined: Sinapis alba (‘IdaGold’),

yellow mustard. Brassica juncea (‘Pacific

Gold’), Oriental mustard. Brassica napus (‘Dwarf

Essex’), rapeseed.

Materials and Methods

Meal treatments: 0.5% (w/w) denatured seed meal. 0.5% (w/w) non denatured seed

meal. 0.5% (w/w) as a non glucosinolate

seed meal. Pythium and no amendment control No Pythium and no amendment

control .

Materials and Methods

Pathogen species Pythium ultimum.

Pathogen species Tomato (“Red Scarlet”) Pepper (“New Ace”)

Each experimental unit 7 conical pots each with two

seeds of the same crop.

Materials and Methods

Design Randomized Complete Block

Design Three replications and repeated

2 times.Data collected Seedling emergence daily from 7 to 11

DAP. Final seedling emergence.

Results

Results

NM.NP

NM.P BN DN.BN BJ DN.BJ SA DN.SA SY0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90 a

b

a a aa

b

a bTomato Seedling Emergence

Seed

lin

g e

merg

en

ce

(%)

Seed meal type

Results

7 8 9 10 110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

DE

DN.DE

DN.IG

DN.PG

IG

NM.NP

NM.P

PG

SY

Days after planting

Seed

lin

g e

merg

en

ce

(%)

Tomato seedling emergence

Results

NM.NP NM.P BN DN.BN BJ DN.BJ SA DN.SA SY0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

a

aba a a

ab

c

b

a

Pepper Seedling Emergence

Seed

lin

g e

merg

en

ce

(%)

Seed meal type

Results

7 8 9 10 110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90DE

DN.DE

DN.IG

DN.PG

IG

NM.NP

NM.P

PG

SY

Days after planting

Seed

lin

g e

merg

en

ce

(%)

Pepper seedling emergence

Conclusions B. juncea, B.napus seed meals

increased pepper and tomato seedling emergence.

Both S. alba seed meals reduced tomato and seedling emergence.

Mechanism for pathogen suppression are dependent but not limited to glucosinolate products content.

Performance of seed meals vary from species to species.

Acknowledgements

Dr Jack Brown-Major Professor

Dr Robert Zemetra Dr Mark Mazzola Canola Lab Crew:

Jim Davis Clark Neely Donna Brown Mary Lauver Lindy Seip

QUESTIONS