exam1 feedback
TRANSCRIPT
Exam #1
1. Explain/describe what is happening on each register, starting with #1 on the
bottom (3 pts)
Subject Matter description should be LITERAL and DESCRIPTIVE. Describe what is actually Happening
1. Army goes into battle
2. Soldiers are killing prisoners
3. King executes prisoners
WEAK RESPONSE
Shows very little evidence
of what was learned
1. Army goes into battle. Describe what is actually happening
2. Soldiers are killing prisoners Not actually true
3. King executes prisoners Not actually true
WEAK RESPONSE
IMPROVED RESPONSE – BUT STILL “MINIMAL”
1. Soldiers riding horse-drawn chariots trample enemy soldiers
2. Soldiers lead prisoners to king
3. King receives prisoners
Shows some
evidence of what
was learned
MORE DESCRIPTIVE RESPONSE
1. Soldiers riding horse-drawn chariots trample enemy soldiers; the number of
enemy dead increases as you move left to right, implying a sequence of time
2. Uniformed soldiers march in disciplined order as they lead prisoners to the
king; the defeated enemy is depicted naked, literally “stripped of rank,” and
appear disorderly to show their defeat
3. In the upper register, the King or Ensi receives the prisoners; he is
identifiable by his size (hierarchic scale), and he is accompanied by his
generals, whose rank is indicted by descending size
Shows mastery of what was
learned, and sophisticated
understanding of how to “describe”
persuasively, and with detail
1. People carrying stuff
2. Middle classes working
3. Ruler/elites enjoying good life
WEAK RESPONSE
Shows very little evidence
of what was learned
IMPROVED RESPONSE – BUT STILL “MINIMAL”
1. Laborers carrying heavy loads
2. Farmers and fishermen bringing supplies to king
3. King and elites enjoy a feast
Shows some evidence of
what was learned
MORE DESCRIPTIVE RESPONSE
1. On the bottom register, laborers (probably prisoners of war) carry heavy
bundles of supplies for the king’s victory banquet
2. Farmers and fishermen bringing supplies to king, illustrating the hierarchical
organization of Sumerian society
3. On the top register the Ensi or king and his priests, wearing kanauke skirts
that indicate their rank, toast their victory. They are seated on chairs, while
they are waited on by servants, and entertained by musicians. The image
illustrates how the people were expected to “serve” the elites
Shows mastery of what was
learned, and sophisticated
understanding of how to “describe”
persuasively, and with detail
3. Using complete sentences, describe the specific ways
in which the king’s power is communicated in this relief (5
pts)
Analysis should do more than just “list” a few things; it should be a thorough analysis that not only explores multiple ways in which the king’s power is communicated, but does so in a convincing and persuasive argument
WHAT I WAS LOOKING FOR IN AN A RESPONSE:
1. Hierarchic scale – the king is the largest
2. The king is the focal point: top, center – all eyes on
him
3. First time a king is depicted as a god in art:
1. Wears the horned crown, worn only by gods
2. Ascends the mountain to the stars, symbolizing
the gods
4. His godly power is also communicated through his
bold and noble stance, and his idealized musculature
5. He is also heavily armed, and tramples his enemy
underfoot
6. His army expresses admiration by imitating his pose
as they follow him up the mountain
7. While Naramsin’s army is disciplined and orderly, the
enemy army is clearly in disarray as they cower in fear,
and fall headlong down the mountain
4. Explain the different function/purpose of these two
statue groups. (3 pts)
Be sure to read the question! The question is asking about the FUCTION/PURPOSE of Votive statues versus Ka statues
WHAT I WAS LOOKING FOR IN AN A RESPONSE :
1. Votive statues: these statues were placed in temples
to pray constantly on behalf of their owners
2. They are not realistic portraits – instead, they are
highly abstract representations of the “idea” of a
person
3. Their large eyes, upward gaze, and humble gesture
reflects their purpose to “serve” the gods
4. Ka statues: these statues were placed in tombs,
rather than temples – and instead of serving the gods,
their purpose was to provide the Pharaoh with a
permanent body for their “Ka” to live in for eternity
5. The statues were made of durable materials so they
would last forever, and there was no negative space so
that nothing would “break”
6. Since the Pharaoh was believed to be an immortal
god, they are typically portrayed as ageless, perfect –
and with no movement, to represent an unchanging
eternity
6. Describe the difference between Royal and non-royal
statues in this society. In what specific ways are they
different, and what can account for this difference? (3 pts)
WHAT I WAS LOOKING FOR IN AN A RESPONSE :
1. Royal Ka statues were made of durable materials,
and with no negative space so they would last forever
2. Pharaohs were typically depicted wearing attributes of
royalty (Nemes headdress and false beard), and were
idealized: youthful physically fit, with no blemishes or
signs of age, to convey their their divine/immortal
status
3. Ka statues of non-royals, were very different, as
illustrated by the Seated Scribe
4. They were made of less durable materials, and
sometimes did have negative space
5. They were also depicted more realistically: this scribe
has a sagging belly and shows signs of age
6. Why: This is because non-royals were not considered
immortal gods
7. Fig 1 is an example of a Ka statue.
8. These statues were placed in a sealed chamber called a serdab
9. What was the purpose of these statues? Ka statues provided a “body” for the Ka, or life force of 10. the deceased individual to inhabit for eternity
10. Fig 2 is an architectural feature of an Egyptian tomb called a False door (I accepted “mastaba” as the grammar was mis-leading)
11. Fig 3 is an example of an Egyptian “offering scene.” What was the purpose of this image?The offering scene depicts the deceased seated at a table laden with food. Its purpose was so that The tomb owner would have an endless supply of food and drink in the afterlife
Fig 1. Fig 2. Fig 3.
7. Describe the distinct way in which the figure in Fig 3 is depicted. What specific conventions are used, and why did Egyptian artists choose to portray the figure in this way? (5 pts)
1. The figure was created using the Egyptian Canon of Proportions, which was a formula that was used to plot the figure out on a grid
2. The figure is shown in the composite pose – which means that while his legs are seen from the side, his shoulders are twisted frontally. This was to ensure that the figure was “complete” with no part missing, so that the Ka could “inhabit” the image for eternity
3. The items on the table are shown in vertical perspective: instead of being shown in depth, the items are stacked up vertically so they can be seen clearly
Fig 1. Fig 2. Fig 3.