evaluation of the indoor air quality of beato angelico building of the university of santo tomas

7/28/2019 Evaluation of the Indoor Air Quality of Beato Angelico Building of the University of Santo Tomas

1/43

Evaluation of the Indoor Air Quality of Beato Angelico

Building of the University of Santo Tomas

Crisencio M. Paner *

* College of Fine Arts and Design, University of Santo Tomas

Abstract

Out of 11 locations in Beato Angelico building sampled on by

agar exposure method, 409 molds isolates were obtained from

which Aspergillus was the most prevalent with 58% occurrence,Cladosporium, 32%, Curvularia, 9%, and the least was

Neurospora, with only 1% occurrence. Interestingly, surface-swabbing of airconditioners and water stained ceilings had also

produced similar fungal genera as that of the agar-exposures,

except for Neurospora which was absent in the surface swabresults. After calibrating the mold counts in accordance with the

standards for settling-plate and surface swab methods, resultsshowed that 75% of the sampling stations for settling plate

method and 100% of the sampling areas for surface swab

method had mold count far beyond the threshold limit value of100 cfu/90mm/4hr [17, 18, 34, 61].

Meanwhile, Chemical analysis had revealed the following

results: a) the TVOC values of 4.2 ppm and 5.4 ppm

respectively based on two stations were far beyond the TLVrequired by WHO, OSHA, and NIOSH [32], b)Total respiratory

dust(TRD) values of 0.9 & 0.3 mg/m3 respectively basedon two stations showed that these values were within the OSHS-

DOLE TLV of 5 mg/m3, & c) the results of CO2


2/43

measurements(< 1mg/m3 based on two stations) showed that

these levels were within threshold limit value of 9,000 mg/m3required by OSHS-DOLE(2005).

Key words: agar exposure method, threshold limit value, Indoor

air quality, TVOC, TRD, CO2

Background of the Study

According to Jackson et al. [35] on average most people spend

80% or more of their daily lives indoors whether at home, work,or in commercial buildings. The US Environmental Protection

Agency [66] notes that indoor air is often two to five times morepolluted than outdoor air. Over the last two decades, there has

been increasing awareness regarding the potential impact of

indoor air pollution on health.

Indoor air quality (IAQ) is a term referring to the air qualitywithin and around buildings and structures, especially as it

relates to the health and comfort of building occupants [33].

Indoor air quality (IAQ) is one of many issues that building

owners should address because better IAQ leads to moreproductive and happier occupants.

In schools and institutional buildings IAQ are tied to learningoutcomes and organizational missions. While it is hard to put

firm numbers on these benefits, there is increasing evidence ofmeasurable productivity increases and reduced absentee rates in

spaces with better IAQ. Second, IAQ problems that get out of


3/43

hand can be quite costly in terms of lost work time, lost use of

buildings, expensive building or mechanical system repairs,legal costs, and bad publicity. While extreme IAQ problems are

rare, they do occur, and the consequences can be dramatic. Lesssevere problems are more common and can erode occupant

productivity and lead to costs for smaller legal disputes or

repairs. [9]

Experts generally agree that healthy indoor school environmentsare a necessity if a high standard of education is to be expected.

Recent studies have shown that schools have significant indoorenvironmental problems. High indoor air pollutant concentration

may have a significant adverse impact on the health andacademic performance of students. [38]

Epidemiological investigations have shown that the `sick-building syndrome(SBS) and hypersensitivity diseases (for

example, asthma) are often associated with exposure to largeconcentrations of airborne microbes. [2, 22, 31]

A study of teachers working in a moisture- and mold-damagedschool building showed, that levels of these inflammatory

markers in nasal lavage fluid were higher compared to controlgroup.[29]

In related studies, 80 fungal genera have been associated withsymptoms of respiratory tract allergies, these include

Cladosporium, Alternaria, Aspergillus and Fusarium,Penicillium, Ulocladium, Sistotrema, Alternaria, Eurotium,

Wallemiu. [25, 30]


4/43

Hourly variations of four orders of magnitude of mold aerosolshave been found in a classroom. [47]

Total Volatile Organic Compounds(TVOCs) are one of the most

commonly measured pollutants in schools. VOCs are suspected

as one of the causes of SBS [44, 70]. Measured values of TVOCcan vary significantly depending upon the sampling and analysis

methods used. Particularly high TVOC concentrations, above 1to 2 mg/m3, indicate the presence of strong VOC sources and/or

low ventilation. Results of studies by the US Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) and other researchers have found thatVOCs are common in the indoor environment and that their

levels may be ten to thousands times higher indoors thanoutdoors. In addition, there may be anywhere from 50 up to

hundreds of individual VOCs in any one indoor air sample. At

very low levels, some VOCs may produce odors that somepeople may consider to be objectionable, while others are

irritants that can cause people to have headaches and eye, noseand throat irritation, and dizziness. At high concentrations, some

VOCs are toxic or may be carcinogenic. Whether or not

someone will become sick or notice an odor is highly variable.Complaints should be taken seriously, however, and

investigated. Primary VOCs found are associated with solvents,paints and coating, adhesives, cleaners, furnishings, and

personal care products. In schools, VOCs are associated with

cleaning supplies, pesticides, building materials and furnishings,office equipment such as copiers and printers, correction fluids

and carbonless copy paper, graphics and craft materialsincluding glues, adhesives and turpentine for painting students,


5/43

permanent markers, whiteboard markers, and photographic

solutions.

Most standards and guidelines consider 200 g/m3 to 500g/m3 TVOC as an acceptable level in buildings. Levels higher

than this may result in irritation to some occupants. However,

lower levels can also be an issue if a particularly toxic substanceor odorant is present. The World Health Organization

recommends that indoor exposures not exceed 0.1 ppm, and thatactions be taken to reduce levels once they read 0.05 ppm.

Although the legal limit covered by OSHA is 0.75 ppm, NIOSH

recommends workers not be exposed to more than 0.016 ppmaveraged over a 10-hour day. [32]

Some chemical constituents of floor cleaning materials have

been recognized as a possible cause of asthma in indoor

environments i.e. colophony based products such as pine oil andtall oil, and benzalkonium chloride [39]. Building materials are

important emission sources of VOCs, especially in newbuildings [69].

Dust means solid particles being blown about or suspended inthe air generated by handling, crushing, cutting, drilling, rapid

impact, spraying, detonations, or disintegrations of inorganic ororganic materials and are of a composition similar to the

substance or substances from which they are derived. Total

Respirable Dust (TRD) is measured gravimetrically. Dust cancontain particles of a wide range of sizes. The effect of these

particles when ingested into the body depends on the size, shapeand chemical nature of the particles. Several studies have


6/43

demonstrated that particles in ambient air have adverse effects

on respiratory health. [14, 19, 52 53, 56, 57, 64]

Carbon dioxide is a normal constituent of exhaled breath and iscommonly measured as a screening tool to evaluate whether

adequate volumes of fresh outdoor are being introduced into

indoor air. The carbon dioxide level is usually greater inside abuilding than outside, even in buildings with few complaints

about indoor air quality. ASHRAE recommends that the indoorCO2 concentration be no greater than 700 ppm above the

outdoor concentration for comfort (odor) reasons [6].

Air Velocity or Ventilation rates have rarely been measured in

schools, although inadequate ventilation is often suspected to bean important condition leading to reported health symptoms.

ASHRAE Standard 62-1999 [8] recommends a minimum

ventilation rate of 8 L/s-person (15 cfm/person) for classrooms.Given typical occupant density of 33 per 90m2 (1000 ft2) and a

ceiling height of 3m (10 ft), the current ASHRAE standardwould require an air exchange rate of about 3 air changes per

hour (ACH) for a classroom.

Humans have difficulties perceiving changes of the relative

humidity (RH), due to lack of sensory receptors for humidity[49]. In contrast, specific sensors exist for the perception of the

temperature. However, reporting of dry air has been

associated with poor indoor air quality (IAQ) or a sub-standardindoor environment since the 1980's [16]. Temperature and RH

measurements are often collected as part of an IEQ investigationbecause these parameters affect the perception of comfort in an

indoor environment. The perception of thermal comfort is


7/43

related to one's metabolic heat production, the transfer of heat to

the environment, physiological adjustments, and bodytemperature [50]. Heat transfer from the body to the

environment is influenced by factors such as temperature,humidity, air movement, personal activities, and clothing.

Moisture is one of the most common causes of IAQ problems in

buildings and has been responsible for some of the most costlyIAQ litigation and remediation. Moisture enables growth of

microorganisms, production of microbial VOCs and allergens,deterioration of materials, and other processes detrimental to

IAQ. In addition, dampness has been shown to be strongly

associated with adverse health outcomes. Control of moisture isthus critical to good IAQ. High indoor humidity can lead to

dampness and low indoor humidity (less than 30% RH) cancause mucus membrane irritation, dry eyes, and sinus

discomfort. Maintaining indoor humidity between 30-50% will

control mold growth and alleviate the symptoms associated withlow humidity. Negative building pressure can draw moist

outdoor air into the building envelope, potentially leading tocondensation. It can also draw moist air into the conditioned

space itself, potentially increasing the latent load beyond the

cooling system design capacity and leading to elevated indoorhumidity. Positive building pressure can push moist indoor air

into the building enclosure, potentially leading to condensationunder heating conditions [15].

ASHRAE recommends that relative humidity in indoorenvironments be maintained between 30% and 50% relative

humidity [6] and that the indoor temperature range provide foroccupant comfort (69.0oF to 76.5oF in the winter and 75.5oF to

81.0oF in the summer at 40% relative humidity [7]. Studies


8/43

indicate that RH about 40% is better for the eyes and upper

airways than levels below 30%. The optimal RH may differ forthe eyes and the airways regarding desiccation of the mucous

membranes [71].

There has been a long-standing historical use of settle plates,

and that European regulatory agencies have supported their use.However, current active air sampling technology can be more

advantageous and effective in assessing airborne viablecontamination in clean rooms than settle plate monitoring. The

use of settle plate monitoring may still be an optional test

method for those applications where other more efficientsampling methods may not be possible or may have limited

applicability [5]. Agar exposure method also known as theSettle plate method relies on the principle that the molds

carrying particles are allowed to settle onto the medium for a

given period of time and incubated at the required temperature.Malt extract agar is the appropriate medium used to culture

molds. The normal sampling time is between 10 to 60 minutes.Though the method has the advantage of simplicity, it has

certain limits. In this method only the rate of deposition of large

particles from the air, not the total number of molds carryingparticles per volume, is measured [62]. Settle plate methods are

insensitive unless a long exposure period is adopted in order todetect the low number of airborne microorganisms. If this is not

carried out the results are biased to give favorable data. If this is

not practicable then plates should be monitored for successivework sessions and the incidence of contamination analyzed. The

average size of microbial particle will deposit, by gravity, ontosurfaces at a rate of approximately 1 cm/s. Petri dishes which are

90 mm in diameter (approximate internal area 64 cm2) are most


9/43

commonly used. For settle-plate method, the standard values are

50 cfu/90mm/4hours for ordinary indoor air at rest, and 100cfu/90mm/4hours for indoor air operational. Clean room at rest

is 5 cfu/90 mm/4 hours, while clean room operational is 50cfu/90mm/4 hours. For swab and contact plate methods, the

standards are 25 cfu/25cm2(for air at rest) and 50 cfu/25cm2(for

air at operational). Clean support standard values on the otherhand are 5 cfu/25cm2(at rest) and 25 cfu/25cm2(operational)

[17, 18, 34, 61].

The Beato Angelico Building (Fig. 5), built in 1991, is an eight-

storey structure that houses the College of Architecture, theCollege of Fine Arts and Design, and an art gallery for the

exhibits of students, faculty members, and alumni artists. Since2001, a portion of the ground floor has also served as the offices

and technical facilities of the UST Publishing House. The

building was designed by Architect Yolanda D. Reyes, a formerdean of the College of Architecture. Beato Angelico building is

located at the corner of Espaa and P.Noval Streets, Manila[12]. The building accommodates around six thousand students

and faculties from both the College of Fine Arts and Design and

the College of Architecture.

There is a scarcity of studies in the Philippines regarding Indoorair quality of schools encompassing both the chemical and

microbiological aspects. In particular there are no figures

available on the prevalence in the Philippines of fungalcontamination in indoor environments. It was the first time that

this study was conducted on the indoor air of a building withinthe campus of the University of Santo Tomas (UST). The study

had the following objectives:


10/43

1. To find the typical concentration levels of fungal bioaerosolin selected indoor environment of Beato Angelico Building.

2. To determine the level of concentrations of selected key

indicators of air pollution such as Total volatile organic

compounds (TVOCs), Total respirable dust(TRD), and Carbondioxide (CO2) .

Materials and Methods

I. Walk-through Inspection

The building were surveyed and observed for signs of building

damage and microbial contaminations such as water stains.

II. Determination of Fungal Contaminations

A. Agar Exposure Method

Five agar plates were exposed for one hour in each floor (near

the stairs) of the building as well as in the three roomsidentified: Faculty room, Rooms 101 and 102 of the 8th Floor.

The plates were placed on a table with a height of at least 1.5

meter above the ground. Malt-extract agar (half-strength) plateswith pH maintained at 3.5 to specifically select for the molds

were prepared.


11/43

At the end of each exposure period, the plates were placed in an

incubator with temperature maintained at room temperature for3-5 days. For identification of molds, each fungal isolate were

cultured on MEA agar blocks on glass slides based on Henricisculture technique. Subsequent sporulating growth were

examined with both stereoscopic and bright field microscopes.

Fungal genera were identified using literatures on Fungal

Taxonomy and Mycology. During the agar exposure, otherparameters of the indoor air were also measured such as

temperature and relative humidity. The number of occupants at

the time of exposure were also counted.

B. Surface Sampling by Swab Method

Sterilized cotton buds moistened with normal saline solution

were swabbed gently on different surfaces (with an area 25 ofcm2 each) suspected with microbial contaminants like water

stain marks on the ceilings and walls, and including louvers ofthe airconditioners. The swabs were then streaked directly onto

plates of half-strength Malt Extract Agar (with pH 3.5 to inhibit

bacteria). Prepared culture plates were incubated at roomtemperature for 3-5 days. Molds genera were identified using the

same procedures as in IIA.

III. Determining the Levels of Indoor Air Chemical

Pollutants

In the absence of specific instruments to be used on this part ofthe study, the researcher commissioned the company First

Analytical Services and Technical Cooperative (F.A.S.T.


12/43

LABORATORIES) to conduct the sampling and analysis. Due

to budgetary constraints only few indicators of indoor airpollution were measured such as Carbon dioxide(CO2), Total

volatile organic compounds (TVOCs), and Total respirable dusts(TRD).

Aside from these other physical parameters of the indoor airwere also measured such as air velocity, temperature, and

humidity. For TRD and CO2, the Main Entrance/Exit and thearea near the stairs in the 2nd floor were the areas sampled on.

While for TVOC, Room 1(first floor) and room 1(eight floor)

were the areas selected for sampling.

Results and Discussions

I. Walk-through Inspection of the Building

During the inspection of the building last March 2, 2010, whichbegan at 2 Oclock in the afternoon and ended at around 5

Oclock in the afternoon, the following things had been

observed: a) several water stains on the ceiling of the facultyroom; b) intense smell of volatile organic chemicals at room

101(ground floor), and room 1 and 2 (eight floor). It was laterfound that this volatile chemical at room 101(ground floor) was

due to the adhesives that the students of the Industrial Design

had bee using, while at room 1 and 2 (eight floor), the volatilechemical was due to turpentine that the Painting students had

been using as thinning agent for their painting pigments, c)Louvers of the aircon in all the rooms selected for sampling


13/43

were found to be full of dust, an indication that they have not

been cleaned for a long time.

Furthermore, from ground floor up to the eight floor near thestairways, it was also observed that air was very hot and humid.

Many students were also observed coming in and out the

building at that time.

II. Determination of Fungal Contaminations

A. Agar Exposure Method or Settle Plate Method

As indicated in Table 1, there was a generally slight decreasing

trend in the number of molds isolated from ground floor to the8th floor of the building. This could be attributed to the number

of people [55] who were present at the time of the sampling. It

has been observed that majority of people were present at theground floor more than in the other floors because of its function

as entrance and exit. Next to ground floor, second floor werefound to have also a greater number of students. It was because

this floor housed the offices and faculty rooms of both the

College of Fine Arts and Design and the College ofArchitecture.

The decreased number of molds isolated from third floor to eight

floor may also be attributed to the lesser number of students

observed to be present during the time of sampling. For room1(ground floor) and rooms 1 & 2 (eight floor), the number

of molds isolated showed almost similarly small. Reason for thiswas because these rooms were airconditioned and even though


14/43

there were occupants (mean 35) inside, they performed lesser

activity compared with those people in the ground floor.

According to Flannigan [25] any activity in the building mightdisturb settled spores causing them to spread in the air.

As for the temperature and relative humidity, Table 1 showed agenerally high values from ground floor to the eight floor with

an exception for room 1(ground floor) and rooms 1 and 2 of theeight floor which were airconditioned.

Increased temperatures and humidities in the environment areconducive to the growth of molds, causing them to multiply

faster and produce spores in great amounts.

Half-strength of Malt-Extract Agar was used in the experiment

in order to delay the growth of some fast growing molds.

As shown in Table 1 & Figure 1, of the 409 molds thatwere isolated from 11 different locations, Aspergillus (Fig. 6b)

was found to be the most prevalent with 58% occurrence,

Cladosporium (Fig. 6c) with 32%, Curvularia (Fig.6a) with 9%,and the least was Neurospora (Fig. 6d), with only 1%

occurrence. The results were not surprising because for example,Aspergillus niger, has been found growing on damp walls and

ceilings [10]. Miller [42] stated that among the facultative

pathogens of Interest, Aspergillus fumigatus, A terreus andsometimes A flavus cause aspergillosis, an invasive lung

disease. On the other hand Cladosporium is a dematiaceous(pigmented) mold widely distributed in air and rotten organic

material and frequently isolated as a contaminant on foods [23,


15/43

24]. The genus Cladosporium includes over 30 species and the

most common ones include Cladosporium elatum,Cladosporium herbarum, Cladosporium sphaerospermum, and

Cladosporium cladosporioides. Cladosporium spp. are causativeagents of skin lesions, keratitis, onychomycosis, sinusitis and

pulmonary infections [20, 59]. Furthermore, Miller [42] had also

affirmed that most people diagnosed as allergic to mold aretested for allergy to Cladosporium cladosporiodes,

Cladosporium herbarum and Alternara alternate. In anotherrelated study, it was found that hay fever has a significant

correlation with indoor fungi, such as Cladosporium,

Epicoccum, and Yeast [63]. Curvularia has three ubiquitousspecies which have been recovered from human infections,

principally from cases of mycotic keratitis; C. lunata, C.pallescens and C. geniculata. Clinical manifestations of

phaeohyphomycosis include sinusitis, endocarditis, peritonitis

and disseminated infection [60]. Neurospora is a common breadmold and has not been normally implicated in any human

disease. But its presence in the air can also possibly causeallergic rhinitis specially to a compromised individuals if

inhaled.

Figure 3 is the experiment set-up for agar exposure method. It

shows a petri-dish placed on top of a stool with half-strengthMalt-Extract Agar(pH 3.5) being exposed for one hour to air at

the ground floor of the Beato Angelico building. Relative

humidity and temperature of the indoor air were also taken inthis site as well as in other 10 more sites. The area with the

highest number of molds isolated were the water stains on theceiling (Table 2 & Fig. 2) of the faculty room. While the

rest of the sampling areas had similarly small numbers of


16/43

isolated molds. But the mere fact that molds were isolated from

all the sampling areas was an indication that majority ofairconditioners were not being cleaned or not being cleaned as

regularly as it should.

A higher number of molds isolated in the water-stained ceiling

can be attributed more on the water that may have infiltrated thegypsum board ceiling and which made it a good breeding

ground for a variety of molds.

This is a rather dangerous situation on the part of the occupants

of this room particularly those who stay there for quite sometimebecause if the contaminated tile ceiling is not replaced

immediately, prolong periods would generate thousands ofspores which when inhaled by a compromised person may cause

him or her an allergic rhinitis or much worse a respiratory

disease such as aspergillosis.

Differences in the size and sedimentation rate of spores alsoaffect what is detected in air samples. For instance, it has been

found out that large Ulocladium spores released from mold

patches on walls in damp houses sediment rapidly [25] so that,even where growth is profuse, the mold is likely to be detected

in the air in quantity only shortly after disturbance of the growthor re-entrainment of settled spores as a result of activity.

Out of 117 molds that were isolated through agar swab methodfrom four sampling locations (consisting of 13 aircon louvers

and three water stained gypsum ceiling boards), Aspergillusrevealed the highest percent occurrence at 60.7%, Cladosporium

was next with 31.6% occurrence, and the least was Curvularia,


17/43

with 7.7% occurrence(figure 5 & table 2). This result is

almost similar as that of Agar exposure results in terms of thekind of fungal genera that were isolated. It was not impossible

because this population of molds after being suspended in the airfor a while would eventually fall on different surfaces due to

earths gravitational pull.

In order to calibrate the average number of molds in Table 1

with that of the standards, the values in the table had to bemultiplied by 4. This was because in the standard, the exposure

time was 4 hours while in the experiment conducted the

exposure period was only 1 hour.

It can be seen in Table 3 that in general the number of moldsisolated from ground floor to eight floor were all beyond the

threshold limit value of 100 cfu/90mm/4hr except for room

1(ground floor) and rooms 1 & 2 at the eight floor whichwere below the threshold limit values. Again these values above

the threshold limit can be accounted for the presence of peopleat the sampling areas during the sampling time. The observed

high temperature and high humidity were also possible reason

for the high mold count since these could provide a conduciveenvironment for the growth of molds [11]. The mold count may

be reduced if only there were exhaust fans in the areas sampledon.

Dampness can occur from existing leaks or new leaks from thewindows, building faade, leaking pipes above the ceiling, or

leaking unit ventilators from the floor above.


18/43

It is generally recognized that the growth of mold on interior

surfaces in buildings is unacceptable and that the amount ofgrowth (surface area) in a room is important in determining the

procedures used in mold remediation [ 3, 45, 46, 51, 67 ].According to Miller [42], fungal contamination of building air is

almost always caused by poor design and/or maintenance.

Molds are transported into the indoor environment through air

circulation or are carried indoors by organisms, including humanbeings, or in the moving of inanimate objects that have molds

attached to their surfaces. When the food source, moisture,

temperature, and so forth in the indoor environment arefavorable, molds can grow.

Ghosh and Hines [27] said that fungi are introduced into an

indoor environment, they can settle in amplification sites where

they thrive and grow. Amplification sites include any site withthe proper pH, temperature, and moisture content.

In some moisture damaged buildings, mold growth is hidden on

construction materials within wall cavities or building

assemblies and thus not readily evident during inspection.Microbial volatile organic compounds reportedly can diffuse

through building construction and may be useful in locatingconcealed mould growth [68].

P. chrysogenum was the dominant culturable mold(concentrations about 200 cfu/m3) found in air samples

collected in leaky rooms. P. crustosum, P. commune, P.spinulosum, and P. aurantiogriseum were also present in leaky


19/43

rooms at concentrations at least an order of magnitude higher

than those detected in the outdoor air [46] .

According to a recent study of Bornehag et al. [13] earlydetection of water leakage was indicative of the extent of visible

mold growth subsequently found on biodegradable construction

materials hidden within exterior walls. The study also showedthat spores from hidden mould growth in exterior walls can enter

the indoor air in sufficient amounts to significantly degradeindoor air quality, e.g., by changing the rank order of taxa in

room air.

Molds may grow on the stagnant water left in the humidifier and

then be aerosolized when the unit is reactivated [54].

Currently, it is suggested by the American Conference of

Governmental Industrial Hygiene [1] that bioaerosolconcentrations higher than 500 CFU/ m3 be considered as a sign

of the presence of a building-related air pollution source.

The fungal concentrations found at most of the indoor

environments should fall within the specified guidelines of theAmerican Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists,

between 100 and 1000 CFU/m3 for the total fungi [2].

As presented in Table 4, the calibrated average number of molds

based on surface swab method for all locations were above thestandard TLV of 50 cfu/25 cm2. These results were proof that in

a natural way, the molds in the air may later on find its way ondifferent surfaces by gravity. However, high number of molds


20/43

found on the surfaces are also indicative of poor cleaning

practices.

The standards set by ACGIH [2] which is between 100-1000CFU/m3 for the total fungi could not be applied in this study

because the methods of sampling of indoor air were both

different. In ACGIH standards, the method of sampling wasbased on an Andersen air sampler (impinger or impactor

apparatus) while in this study, the indoor air was sampledthrough settling-plate method. Of course, the first one was much

more accurate than the second one, however in the absence of

the air sampling apparatus which is more expensive, Agarexposure method may still be used as an alternative. Its

accuracy however may be just increased by using higher numberof agar-exposure plates per sampling location, by increasing the

time of exposure (at least up to 4 hours), by being careful not to

contaminate the plates, and by using appropriate media forculturing the molds like malt-extract-agar, saborauds dextrose

agar, etc

III. Determining the Levels of Indoor Air Chemical

Pollutants

In the chemical analysis of the indoor air of Beato Angelicobuilding, a private company (FAST Laboratories) was

commissioned to the job, the methods of sampling and analysis

were based on Occupational Safety and Health Standards-Department of Labor and Employment (OSHS-DOLE), 2005

and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health(NIOSH).


21/43

Table 5 shows the summary of different parameters that were

measured as well the different sampling methods and analyticalmethods applied in this study.

Total Volatile Organic Compounds(TVOCs)

In this study the Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOCs)were collected using VX 500 Gas analyzer and measured using a

PID RAE monitor.

Presented in Table 6 were the levels of Total Volatile Organic

Compounds in the two identified locations namely Room F101and room F802. These two rooms were particularly selected

because of the observed presence of VOC smell in these rooms.In room F101, it was observed that there was a smell of

adhesives which the Industrial Design students were using.

While in room F802, there was a recurring smell of turpentine inthe room which the Painting students were using when they

conduct oil painting sessions.

Unfortunately, OSHS-DOLE had no existing Threshold Limit

Value(TLV) for TVOCs, so the researcher conducted intensiveresearch on the reference standards from the library and the

World Wide Web.

Lucky enough, the researcher had found what he was looking

for. He had found actually not only one but 3 different referencestandards, namely: WHO, OSHA, and NIOSH [32] . So,

referring again to Table 6, the TVOC values of 4.2 ppm (forroom F101) and 5.4 ppm (for room F802) were very far higher

compared with the 0.1 ppm TLV set by World Health


22/43

Organization [32]. In this case TVOC value in F101 was 42

times higher than WHO TLV, while in room F802 the TVOCvalue was 54 times higher compared with WHO Threshold limit

values for VOCs. Comparing still the measured TVOC valueswith OSHA [32] standard of 0.75 ppm, it was obvious that the

measured values for the two rooms were very much higher

compared with the OSHA TLV.

NIOSH [32] has even stricter standard when it recommendsworkers not be exposed to more than 0.016 ppm averaged over a

10-hour day. If this would be applied to the two rooms

mentioned then the students in these rooms, assuming they stayin that rooms for 10 hours, then they are exposed to 300 times

more than the threshold limit value. This reminded me when onetime, Prof. Noel Escultura (Pers. Comm., March 7, 2010)

admitted that he knew his Painting class were getting high

already on turpentine(VOC) when suddenly they began makingnoises and there was also a sudden change in his students

behavior.

But actually, this problem may be easily remedied by putting

exhaust fans in the room. These fans can siphon out thesevolatile organic compounds that are present in the room.

Requiring students to wear gas mask is also one solutionalthough, some may complain of uneasy feeling in using the

mask.

Total Respirable Dust(TRD)

The Threshold Limit Value(TLV) for Total respirable

Dust(TRD) set by OSHS-DOLE(2005) was 5 mg/m3. In this


23/43

study TRD was collected through filtration method and analysis

was done gravimetrically.

Presented in Table 7 is the dust concentrations (TRD) measuredat Main Entrance/Exit and 2nd floor of Beato Angelico building.

Comparing the two values with the OSHS-DOLE TLV of 5

mg/m3 would show that they are within the threshold limitvalue. However, if we would apply the standard of Molhave [43]

and Helmis et al. [28], the two values are much higher comparedwith threshold limit value of 50 microgram/m3 even if these two

values are adjusted with that of the standard.

Differences in standards are expected because one could decide

to increase his standard in order to achieve higher quality indoorair while the other one could not increase yet the standard

because of some considerations like inability of majority of

companies to follow yet a higher standard in terms of indoor airquality. Financial factor is also one reason because it also

requires big amount of money to achieve or maintain a higherquality of indoor air.

Particulate air pollution is a complex mixture of solid particlesand liquid droplets of different size, composition and origin.

Particles with a diameter less than 10 micron are of specialinterest since they are inhalable. These particles are often

referred to us PM10 [52].

According to Molhave [43] and Helmis et al. [28], the minimum

acceptable concentration PM10 in the indoor environmentshould be 50 microgram (g)/m3 at 24 continuous hour

exposure.


24/43

RH has an effect on the formation and size of secondaryaerosols and therefore on the deposition. Low RH appears to

enhance particle deposition of fine particles [36] and high RHlikewise [26, 41].

Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

The threshold limit value for CO2 level based on the OSHS-DOLE(2005) is 9,000 mg/m3. In this study CO2 was collected

using gas sampling bag then analyzed through direct

measurement. As shown in Table 8, the results of CO2measurements were within Threshold Limit Value of 9,000

mg/m3 required by OSHS-DOLE(2005). These findings showan adequacy of ventilations for the areas measured.

Elevated CO2 concentrations suggest that other indoorcontaminants may also be increased. Carbon dioxide is a simple

asphyxiant, and can also act as a respiratory irritant [37]. Butexposure to an extremely high CO2 concentration (above

30,000ppm) is required before significant health problems are

likely.

Exposures above 30,000 ppm can lead to headaches, dizziness,and nausea [65]. Yang et al. [72] found that these concentrations

also affect perception of motion. This may be because CO2 has

been shown to moderate the activity of cells within the visualcortex.

Few studies are available about the ventilation levels and the

CO2 concentration in schools. Most studies conclude that


25/43

schools do not meet the ventilation levels foreseen by the

ASHRAE standard 62-1999, while the indoor CO2concentration usually exceeds the threshold of 1000 ppm [21,

40].

Myhrvold, et al. [48] studied 22 classrooms in 5 Norwegian

schools renovated with the objective of improving indoor airquality. Pre- and post-renovation measurements were made,

including health symptom questionnaires and performance testsadministered to 550 students, and measurements of CO2

concentrations. These investigators found a statistically

significant partial correlation (one way ANOVA, p< 0.001)between symptoms of headaches, dizziness, heavy headed,

tiredness, difficulties concentrating, unpleasant odor, and highCO2 concentrations (1500-4000 ppm compared to

concentrations below 1500 ppm). Health symptoms

characterized as "irritations of the upper airways" were alsohigher at higher CO2 concentrations (p=0.024). Reduced

performance on the Swedish Performance Evaluation Systemtest was also observed at higher concentrations of CO2.

On the other hand, an epidemiological study in 3 complaint and4 non-complaint Dutch schools (14 classrooms total) assessed

relationships between SBS symptom complaints of children andCO2 levels and indoor climate [58]. The complaint of bad odor

of the air was associated with high CO2 levels.

Air Velocity or Ventilation Rates

Ventilation rate was measured using thermo-anemometer. Air

movements were taken near the supply of air and students


26/43

position. While monitoring was being conducted, the general

weather condition was taken into consideration and applicablestandards were used. In the sampling conducted, the general

weather condition was sunny.

Results presented in Table 9 demonstrate air velocity (of fan)

values for room F101 and room F802 were generally higher thanthe 150 ft./min (summer) standards of OSHS-DOLE(2005) .

These higher values are interestingly indicative of a higherventilation rates in the two rooms sampled on. But it was also

ironic because it was in these two rooms where TVOCs were

very high. Well, even if the electric fans are put on but if thereare no exit points or no exhaust fans that would remove the

VOCs, then these VOCs will still remain inside the room. Itwould just circulate inside the room and not come out because

there is no exit point .

Conclusion and Recommendations

Microbiological analysis of the indoor air of Beato Angelico

building revealed the existence of high level of molds in the air

which were beyond the standards. This implies therefore, theneed to conduct a more thorough clean-up process of the

affected areas. As for the chemical analysis of the selected areas,it was found out that a greater concern was on the Total volatile

organic compounds(TVOCs) values of the three rooms F101,

F801 and F802 which were far beyond the threshold limit valuesset by the three respected institutions namely, World Health

Organization(WHO), National Institute for Occupational Safetyand Health (NIOSH) and Occupational Safety and Health Act

(OSHA) [32]. But this problem can be remedied by simply


27/43

putting up powerful exhaust fans in the concerned rooms. In this

way, for example, the turpentine released in the air will besiphoned out and is not going to stay inside the room.

But to make sure that all the remedial measures are being

applied effectively, it would be better if there will be a regular

monitoring of the indoor air.

Acknowledgments

The researcher would like to thank the University of Santo

Tomas for extending financial support in order to make thisresearch a success. Special mentioned is given also to the

following persons for their guidance and unwavering support:Dr. Clarita M. de Leon Carillo, Director of UST Academic

Affairs & Research, Dr. Christina A. Binag, Director

Research Center for the Natural Sciences, and Dr. Cynthia B.Loza, Dean UST-College of Fine Arts and Design.

References

[1]. ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial

Hygiene). Bioaerosols: Rationale for monitoring airborne viablemicroorganisms in the office environment. Appl. Ind. Hyg. 4:

R19-R23; 1986.

[2]. American Conference of Governmental Industrial

Hygienists,(ACGIH), 1989. Guidelines for the Assessment ofBioaerosols in the Indoor Environment. Cincinnati, Ohio.


28/43

[3]. ACGIH, 1999. Remediation of microbial contamination. In:

Macher, J. (Ed.), Bioaerosols: Assessment and Control,American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists,

Cincinnati (Chapter 15).

[4]. American Conference of Governmental Industrial

Hygienists,(ACGIH), 2009.Indoor Air Quality Guide.Cincinnati, Ohio.

[5]. Andon, Barbara M. (Sr. Regulatory Analyst, Merck &

Co., Inc., West Point, PA 19486). Active Air vs. Passive Air

(Settle Plate) Monitoring in Routine Environmental MonitoringPrograms (unpublished)

[6]. ANSI/ASHRAE(2004)(a). Ventilation for acceptable indoor

air quality. American National Standards Institute/ASHRAE

standard 62.1- 2004. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating,Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.

[7]. ANSI/ASHRAE [2004](b). Thermal environmental

conditions for human occupancy. American National Standards

Institute/ASHRAE standard 55-2004.

[8]. ASHRAE (1999).Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor AirQuality, Standard 62-1999, American Society for Heating,

Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA.

[9]. ASHRAE. 2009. 2009 ASHRAE Handbook

Fundamentals. Atlanta: American Society of Heating,Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.


29/43

[10]. Aspergillus. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspergillus

(Retrieved Jan. 24, 2010)

[11]. Bates, J.M. and Mahaffy, D.J. (1996) Relationships ofreported allergy symptoms, relative humidity and

airbornebiologicals in thirteen Florida classrooms, Proceedings

of Indoor Air 96: The 7th International Conference onIndoorAir Quality and Climate, Nagoya, Japan, July, 1996, Vol. 1,

551-556.

[12]. Beato Angelico Building.

http://www.ust.edu.ph/index.php/landmarks/110-beato-angelico-gallery.html. (Accessed on 19 April 2010)

[13]. Bornehag, C.-G., Blomquist, G., Gyntelberg, F., Jarvholm,

B., Malmberg, P., Nordvall, L., Nielsen, A., Pershagen, G.,

Sundell, J., 2001. Dampness in buildings and health. Indoor Air11, 7286.

[14]. Braun-Fahrlander, C.U., Ackermann-Liebrich, J. Schwartz,

H.P. Gnehm, M. Rutishauser and H.U. Wanner. Air pollution

and respiratory symptons in preschool children. Am. Rev.Respir. Dis., 145(1992) 42-47.

[15]. Leila S. R. Brickus, * Jari N. Cardoso, and Francisco R.

de Aquino Neto. Distributions of Indoor and Outdoor Air

Pollutants in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Implications to Indoor AirQuality in Bayside Offices, LADETEC - Instituto de Qumica

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Ilha do Fundo, CT,Bloco A Sala 607, 21949-900, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil ,

Environ. Sci. Technol., 1998, 32 (22), pp 34853490


30/43

[16]. Brightman HS, Moss N. Sick building syndrome studiesand the compilation of normative and comparative values. In:

Spengler JD, Samet JM, McCarthy JF, editors. Indoor air qualityhandbook. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000. p. 3.13.32.

[17]. British Standards Institue (BSI). Clean rooms andassociated controlled environments. BS EN ISO 14644-1.

Classification of air cleanliness. UK, 1999.

[18]. British Standards Institue (BSI). Clean rooms and

associated controlled environments. BS EN ISO 14644-2Specification for testing and monitoring to prove continued

compliance with Part 1. 2000

[19]. B. Brunekreef, Associations between questionnaire reports

of home dampness and childhood respiratory symptoms, Sci.Total Environ.127 (1992) 7989.

[20]. Collier, L., A. Balows, and M. Sussman. 1998. Topley

& Wilson's Microbiology and Microbial Infections, 9th ed,

vol. 4. Arnold, London, Sydney, Auckland, New York.

[21]. J. Daisey, W.J. Angell, M.G. Apte, Indoor air quality,ventilation and health symptoms in schools: an analysis of

existing information, Indoor Air International Journal of

Indoor Air Quality and Climate 13 (1) (2003) 5364.

[22]. Dales R.E., Zwanenburg H., Burnett R., Franklin C.A.,1991. Respiratory health Effects of Home Dampness and Molds


31/43

among Children. American Journal of Epidemiology 134,196-

203.

[23]. De Hoog, G. S., F. Queiroz-Telles, G. Haase, G.Fernandez-Zeppenfeldt, D. A. Angelis, A. van den Ende, T.

Matos, H. Peltroche-Llacsahuanga, A. A. Pizzirani-Kleiner, J.

Rainer, N. Richard-Yegres, V. Vicente, and F. Yegres. 2000.Black fungi: clinical and pathogenic approaches. Med Mycol.

38:243-250.

[24]. Dixon, D. M., and A. Polak-Wyss. 1991. The medically

important dematiaceous fungi and their identification. Mycoses.34:1-18.

[25]. Flannigan, Brian. Air sampling for fungi in indoor

environments. J Aerosol Sci Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 381-392, 1997

[26]. Fromme H, Twardella D, Dietrich S, Heitmann D, Schierl

R, Liebl B, et al. Particulate matter in the indoor air ofclassrooms-exploratory results from Munich and surrounding

area. Atmos Environ 2007;41:85466.

[27]. Ghosh, T.K. and Hines A.L. Removal of

microorganisms/particulates from indoor air. In Adsorption andits Applications in Industry and Environmental Protection

Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, Vol. 120, A.

Dabrowski (Editor), 1998, p. 833

[28]. C.G. Helmis, J. Tzoutzas, H.A. Flocas , C.H. Halios , O.I.Stathopoulou ,V.D. Assimakopoulos , V. Panis, M. Apostolatou


32/43

, G. Sgouros , E. Adam . Indoor air quality in a dentistry clinic.

Science of the Total Environment 377 (2007) 3493

[29]. Hirvonen M.R., Ruotsalainen M., Roponen M., HyvarinenA., Husman T., Kosma V.M., Komulainen H., Savolainen K.,

Nevalainen A., 1999. Nitric oxide and Proinflammatory

Cytokines in Nasal Lavage Fluid Associated with Symptomsand Exposure to Moldy Building Microbes. Am. J. Respir. Crit.

Care Med. 160 (6), 19431946.

[30]. Horner WE, Helbling A, Salvaggio JE, Lehrer SB. Fungal

allergens. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995;8:161-79.

[31]. Husman T.,Koskinen O., HyvaKrinen A., Reponen T.,Ruuskanen J., Nevalainen A., 1993. Respiratory Symptoms and

Infections Among Residents in Dwellings with Moisture

Problems or Mould Growth. In: Kalliokoski, P., Jantunen, M.,SeppaK nen, O. (Eds.), Proceedings of Indoor Air '93, Vol.

4.Helsinki, Finland, pp. 171-174.

[32]. Indoor Chemical Pollutants(ICP).

http://www.aerias.org/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabindex=2&tabid=64. (Retrieved March 4, 2010)

[33]. Indoor Air

Quality(IAQ).http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indoor_air_quality

(retrieved March 2, 2010)

[34]. Institute of Environmental Sciences(IES). Microorganismsin clean rooms. Contamination Control Division Recommended

Practice. 1993


33/43

[35]. Jackson L., Wells R., Munson A.E., Anderson S.E.Identification of Indoor Air Contaminates Using an in Vitro

Exposure System. Toxicologist 2009 Mar; 108(1):313

[36]. Litvak A, Gadgil AJ, Fisk WJ. Hygroscopic fine mode

particle deposition on electronic circuits and resultingdegradation of circuit performance: an experimental study.

Indoor Air 2000;10:4756.

[37]. Maroni, M., Seifert, B., Lindvall, T. (Eds.), 1995. Indoor

Air Quality - A Comprehensive Reference Book. Elsevier,Amsterdam.

[38]. Matela, D. How to improve indoor air quality. In Filtration

+ Separation November 2006, pp. 24-27

[39]. McCoach JS, Robertson AS, Burge PS. Floor cleaning

materials as a cause of occupational asthma. In: Raw G,Aizlewood C, Warren P, editors. Proceedings of Indoor Air 99,

Edinburgh 1999;5:459-464.

[40]. M. Mendell, G.A. Heath, Do indoor pollutants and thermal

conditions in schools influence student performance? A criticalreview of the literature, Indoor Air International Journal of

Indoor Air Quality and Climate 15 (1) (2005) 2752.

[41]. Miguel AF, Reis AH, Aydin M. Aerosol particle

deposition and distribution in bifurcating ventilation ducts. JHazard Mater 2004;116:24955.


34/43

[42]. Miller, J.D. Fungi as contaminants in indoor air.

Atmospheric Environment, 1992; 26A(12):2163- 2172

[43]. L. Molhave, Indoor climate, air pollution and humancomfort, J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1 (1991) 6381.

[44]. Molhave, L., 2003. Organic compounds as indicators of airpollution. Indoor Air 13 (6), 1219.

[45]. Morey, P.R., 2001. Remediation and control of microbial

growth in problem buildings. In: Flannigan, B., Samson, R.A.,

Miller, J.D. (Eds.),Microorganisms in Home and Indoor WorkEnvironments. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 8399.

[46]. Morey, P.R., Hull, M.C., Andrew, M. El Nino water leaks

identify rooms with concealed mould growth and degraded

indoor air quality. International Biodeterioration &Biodegradation 52 (2003) 197202.

[47]. Moudlleseaux A and Squtnazl F (1991) Contamination

microbienne de Fair strategie d'etude et exemples de differents

environnements Societe Francalse d'aerobiologle 3eme congressnatlonale. 18 Rue de Vincennes. 93100 Montreull France.

[48]. Myhrvold, A.N., Olsen, E., and Lauridsen, O. (1996)

Indoor environment in schools - pupils health and performance

in regard to CO2 concentrations, Proceedings of Indoor Air96: The 7th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and

Climate, Nagoya, Japan, July, 1996, Vol. 4, 369-374.


35/43

[49]. Nagda NL, Rector HE. A critical review of reported air

concentrations of organic compounds in aircraft cabins. IndoorAir 2003;13:292301.

[50]. NIOSH [1986]. Criteria for a recommended standard:

occupational exposure to hot environments, revised criteria.

Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and HumanServices, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control,

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS(NIOSH) Publication No. 86-13.(NIOSH) Publication No. 92-

100. Page 20 Health Hazard Evaluation Report No. 2005-0033

and 2005 -0234.

[51]. NYC, 2000. Guidelines on Assessment and Remediation ofFungi in Indoor Environments. Department of Health, New

York City, New York.New York City Department of Health and

Mental Hygiene. Guidelines on assessment and remediation offungi in indoor environments. New York, NY: Department of

Health and Mental Hygiene; 2005. Available athttp://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/epi/moldrpt1.shtml#enviro.

[52]. Ormstad, H.,P.E., Gaarder, B.V. Johansen. Quantificationand characterisation of suspended particulate matter in indoor

air.The Sci. of Tot. Envi. 193(1997) 185-196

[53]. Ostro, B.D., M.J. Lipsett, M.B. Wiener and J.C. Selner.

Asthmatic response to airborne acid aerosols. Am. J. PublicHealth, 81(6)(1991) 694-702.


36/43

[54]. Owen, M.K., Ensor, D.S., Sparks, L.E. Airborne particle

sizes and sources found in indoor air. AtmosphericEnvironment, Vol 26A No 12 pp 2149-2162, 1992

[55]. Pastuszka,J.S.,Paw, K.T.,Lis, D.O.,Wlazo A., Ulg, K.

Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000) 3833-3842.

[56]. Pope III, C.A. Respiratory hospital admission associated

with PM10 pollution in Utah, Salt Lake, and Cache Valleys.Arch Environ. Health., 46 (2) (1991) 90-97.

[57]. Pope III, C.A., D.W. Dockery, J.D. Spengler and M.E.Raizenne. Respiratory health and PM10 pollution. Am. Respir.

Dis., 144(1991) 668-674.

[58]. Potting, J., van de Sandt, P., ter Haar Romeny-Wacher, I.,

Brunekreef, B. and Boleij, J.S.M. (1987) Health complaints,CO2 levels and indoor climate in Dutch schools, In: Indoor Air

'87: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Indoor AirQuality and Climate, Berlin (West), Institute of Water, Soil and

Air Hygiene, Vol. 3, 582-586.

[59]. Pritchard, R. C., and D. B. Muir. 1987. Black fungi: a

survey of dematiaceous hyphomycetes from clinical specimensidentified over a five year period in a reference laboratory.

Pathology. 19:281-4.

[60]. Rippon, J.W. 1988. Medical Mycology. 3rd Edition. W.B.

Saunders Co., Philadelphia,USA.


37/43

[61]. Scottish Quality Assurance Specialist Interest Group

(SQASIG). Guidelines on environmental monitoring for asepticdispensing facilities. Third Edition. November 2002.

[62].Settle-plate-method.

http://www.microbiologyprocedure.com/air-microbiology/settle-

plate- method.htm (retrieved March 29, 2010)

[63]. Su, H.J.; Burge, H.A. Examination of microbiologicalconcentrations and association with children respiratory health.

In: Walkinshaw, D.S., ed. Proc. 5th int. conf. Indoor Air Quality

and Climate, Vol. 4. Canada Mortgage and HousingCorporation; 1990: 21-26.

[64]. Schwartz, J., D.W., Dockery, L.M. Neas, D. Wypij, J.H.,

Ware, J.D.Spengler, P. Koutrakis, F.E. Speizer and B.G. Ferris,

Jr. Acute effects of summer air pollution on respiratorysymptom reporting in children. Am. J. Repir. Crit. Care Med.,

150(1994) 1234-11242.

[65]. Schwarzberg, M.N., 1993. Carbon dioxide level as

migraine threshold factor: hypothesis and possible solutions.Medical Hypotheses 41 (1), 35-36.

[66]. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Indoor Air

Quality Tools for Schools.IAQ Coordinators Guide, EPA 402-

K-95-001, EPA, Washington, DC, 1995.

[67]. US Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). A brief guideto mold, moisture, and your home. Washington, DC: US

Environmental Protection Agency; 2002. Available at


38/43

http://www.epa.gov/iaq/molds/moldguide.htm

[68]. Wessen, B., StrVom, G., Palmgren, U., Schoeps, K.-O.,

Nilss)on, M., 2001. Analysis of microbial volatile organiccompounds. In: Flannigan, B., Samson, R.A., Miller, J.D. (Eds.),

Microorganisms in Home and Indoor Work Environments.

Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 267274.

[69]. Wolkoff, P., 1999. How to measure and evaluate volatileorganic compound emissions from building products: a

perspective. The Science of Total Environment 227, 197213.

[70]. Wolkoff, P., Nielsen, G.D., 2001. Organic compounds in

indoor air-their relevance for perceived indoor air quality?Atmospheric Environment 35, 44074417.

[71]. Wolkoff, P and Kjrgaard, S.K. The dichotomy of relativehumidity on indoor air quality(Review article). Environment

International 33 (2007) 850857.

[72]. Yang, Y, Sun, C, Sun, M., 1997. The effect of moderately

increased CO2 concentration on perception of coherent motion.Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 38 (4), 1786.

List of Tables:
http://www.epa.gov/iaq/molds/moldguide.htmhttp://www.epa.gov/iaq/molds/moldguide.htm


39/43
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGGiO1MyrI/AAAAAAAAAJQ/EaRrtH8_NyE/s1600/table+5.jpghttp://4.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGMWqp-VOI/AAAAAAAAALA/QhIGeElrvGQ/s1600/table+3.jpghttp://2.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGGPJf6iHI/AAAAAAAAAJA/7AIsBqYzF9Y/s1600/table+2.jpghttp://4.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGGGqQ2E7I/AAAAAAAAAI4/SkIMwb1EXO4/s1600/Table+1.jpg


40/43
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGHhoXIxwI/AAAAAAAAAJ4/QKwhI7o9bBE/s1600/table+10.jpghttp://3.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGHb5OocKI/AAAAAAAAAJw/apNNCiOjsQo/s1600/table+9.jpghttp://4.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGHU6rtQOI/AAAAAAAAAJo/2lj2Sss63aw/s1600/table+8.jpghttp://3.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGHPjwNH1I/AAAAAAAAAJg/mew14bFqaFQ/s1600/table+7.jpghttp://1.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGGw-TmaQI/AAAAAAAAAJY/KNLBDW1m9Hs/s1600/table+6.jpg


41/43

List of Figures:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGH2RRHX0I/AAAAAAAAAKQ/sIsiKFCZFDo/s1600/figure+1.jpghttp://2.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGHtLhmfpI/AAAAAAAAAKI/EAmAxECoxpU/s1600/table+12.jpghttp://2.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGHn3mLRlI/AAAAAAAAAKA/MFhm464cSF8/s1600/table+11.jpg


42/43
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGISqGQ6xI/AAAAAAAAAKo/cXwC0-vDUuM/s1600/figure+4.jpghttp://1.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGICqufGSI/AAAAAAAAAKg/3Z4hRznwvTE/s1600/figure+3.jpghttp://2.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGH8naMYNI/AAAAAAAAAKY/ysyBF_PX2PI/s1600/figure+2.jpg


43/43

Acknowledgement: The author would like to thank the University of Santo

Tomas administrations for providing the funds needed for the above research.

About the Author: Prof. Crisencio Paner has been teaching at the College of FineArts and Design,University of Santo Tomas Manila for more than 18 years now.

He has also been restoring paintings and other artworks since 2000. His

portfolio can be found in his blog, http://cmpaner.blogspot.com(The Painting

Doctor-Restorer/Conservator). He can be contacted at mobile nos. 0999-

9401794 or at Tel. 02 416-2489)
http://cmpaner.blogspot.com/http://cmpaner.blogspot.com/http://cmpaner.blogspot.com/http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGIqEeM7GI/AAAAAAAAAK4/814p7SK8PLM/s1600/figure+6.jpghttp://2.bp.blogspot.com/_uTcwGygI2ZA/TEGIl21nqWI/AAAAAAAAAKw/3KZH5ZXBk4I/s1600/figure+5.jpghttp://cmpaner.blogspot.com/

evaluation of the indoor air quality of beato angelico building of the university of santo tomas

Documents