evaluation of hawaii’s weighted student formula

88
Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix Jay Chambers, Jesse Levin, Diana Epstein, Nick Mills, Mahala Archer, Antonia Wang, and Kevin Lane American Institutes for Research JUNE 2013

Upload: others

Post on 08-May-2022

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

Evaluation of Hawaii’s

Weighted Student Formula

Technical Appendix

Jay Chambers, Jesse Levin, Diana Epstein, Nick Mills,

Mahala Archer, Antonia Wang, and Kevin Lane

American Institutes for Research

JUNE 2013

Page 2: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

Contents

Page

WSF Principal Survey – Technical Appendix ................................................................................................. 1

Empowerment and Flexibility, by Geographic Isolation ........................................................................ 1

Empowerment and Flexibility, by Neighbor Island Status ..................................................................... 3

Empowerment and Flexibility of Mixed Schools .................................................................................... 4

Empowerment and Flexibility, by Elementary School Size .................................................................... 6

Empowerment and Flexibility, by Middle School Size ............................................................................ 7

Empowerment and Flexibility, by High School Size ................................................................................ 9

Empowerment and Flexibility, by FRPL Levels ..................................................................................... 10

Empowerment and Flexibility, by ELL Levels ........................................................................................ 12

Empowerment and Flexibility, by Locale .............................................................................................. 13

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by Geographic Isolation ............................... 15

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by Neighboring Island Status ....................... 17

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components of Mixed Schools ........................................... 20

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by Elementary School Size ........................... 22

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by Middle School Size .................................. 25

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by High School Size ...................................... 27

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by FRPL Level ................................................ 30

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by ELL Level .................................................. 32

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by Locale ...................................................... 35

Resource and Programmatic Equity, by Geographic Isolation ............................................................. 37

Resource and Programmatic Equity, by Neighbor Island Status .......................................................... 39

Resource and Programmatic Equity of Mixed Schools ......................................................................... 40

Resource and Programmatic Equity, by Elementary School Size ......................................................... 42

Page 3: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

Resource and Programmatic Equity, by Middle School Size ................................................................ 43

Resource and Programmatic Equity, by High School Size .................................................................... 45

Resource and Programmatic Equity, by FRPL Levels ............................................................................ 46

Resource and Programmatic Equity for Student Needs, by ELL Level ................................................. 48

Resource and Programmatic Equity, by Locale .................................................................................... 49

Transparency, by Geographic Isolation ................................................................................................ 51

Transparency, by Neighbor Island Status ............................................................................................. 52

Transparency of Mixed Schools ............................................................................................................ 52

Transparency, by Elementary School Size ............................................................................................ 53

Transparency, by Middle School Size ................................................................................................... 54

Transparency, by High School Size ....................................................................................................... 54

Transparency, by FRPL Level ................................................................................................................ 55

Transparency, by ELL Level ................................................................................................................... 55

Transparency, by Locale ....................................................................................................................... 56

Accountability, by Geographic Isolation ............................................................................................... 56

Accountability, by Neighbor Island Status ............................................................................................ 57

Accountability of Mixed Schools .......................................................................................................... 58

Accountability, by Elementary School Size ........................................................................................... 59

Accountability, by Middle School Size .................................................................................................. 60

Accountability, by High School Size ...................................................................................................... 61

Accountability, by FRPL Level ............................................................................................................... 62

Accountability, by ELL Level ................................................................................................................. 63

Accountability, by Locale ...................................................................................................................... 64

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by Geographic Isolation ........................................ 65

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by Neighbor Island Status ..................................... 66

Page 4: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings of Mixed Schools .................................................... 67

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by Elementary School Size .................................... 68

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by Middle School Size............................................ 69

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by High School Size................................................ 70

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by FRPL Level ......................................................... 71

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by ELL Level ........................................................... 72

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by Locale ............................................................... 73

SCC Engagement, by Geographic Isolation ........................................................................................... 75

SCC Engagement, by Neighboring Island Status ................................................................................... 75

SCC Engagement of Mixed Schools ...................................................................................................... 76

SCC Engagement, by Elementary School Size ....................................................................................... 76

SCC Engagement, by Middle School Size .............................................................................................. 77

SCC Engagement, by High School Size .................................................................................................. 77

SCC Engagement, by FRPL Level ........................................................................................................... 78

SCC Engagement, by ELL Level ............................................................................................................. 78

SCC Engagement, by Locale .................................................................................................................. 79

Faculty Engagement, by Geographic Isolation ..................................................................................... 79

Faculty Engagement, by Neighbor Island Status .................................................................................. 80

Faculty Engagement of Mixed Schools ................................................................................................. 80

Faculty Engagement, by Elementary School Size ................................................................................. 81

Faculty Engagement, by Middle School Size ........................................................................................ 81

Faculty Engagement, by High School Size ............................................................................................ 82

Faculty Engagement, by FRPL Level ..................................................................................................... 82

Faculty Engagement, by ELL Level ........................................................................................................ 83

Faculty Engagement, by Locale ............................................................................................................ 83

Page 5: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula
Page 6: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —1

WSF Principal Survey – Technical Appendix

Empowerment and Flexibility, by Geographic Isolation

Page 7: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —2

Page 8: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —3

Empowerment and Flexibility, by Neighbor Island Status

Page 9: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —4

Empowerment and Flexibility of Mixed Schools

Page 10: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —5

Page 11: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —6

Empowerment and Flexibility, by Elementary School Size

Page 12: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —7

Empowerment and Flexibility, by Middle School Size

Page 13: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —8

Page 14: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —9

Empowerment and Flexibility, by High School Size

Page 15: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —10

Empowerment and Flexibility, by FRPL Levels

Page 16: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —11

Page 17: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —12

Empowerment and Flexibility, by ELL Levels

Page 18: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —13

Empowerment and Flexibility, by Locale

Page 19: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —14

Page 20: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —15

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by Geographic Isolation

Page 21: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —16

Page 22: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —17

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by Neighboring Island Status

Page 23: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —18

Page 24: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —19

Page 25: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —20

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components of Mixed Schools

Page 26: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —21

Page 27: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —22

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by Elementary School Size

Page 28: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —23

Page 29: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —24

Page 30: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —25

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by Middle School Size

Page 31: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —26

Page 32: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —27

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by High School Size

Page 33: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —28

Page 34: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —29

Page 35: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —30

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by FRPL Level

Page 36: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —31

Page 37: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —32

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by ELL Level

Page 38: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —33

Page 39: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —34

Page 40: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —35

Control Over the School’s Programmatic Components, by Locale

Page 41: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —36

Page 42: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —37

Resource and Programmatic Equity, by Geographic Isolation

Page 43: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —38

Page 44: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —39

Resource and Programmatic Equity, by Neighbor Island Status

Page 45: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —40

Resource and Programmatic Equity of Mixed Schools

Page 46: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —41

Page 47: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —42

Resource and Programmatic Equity, by Elementary School Size

Page 48: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —43

Resource and Programmatic Equity, by Middle School Size

Page 49: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —44

Page 50: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —45

Resource and Programmatic Equity, by High School Size

Page 51: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —46

Resource and Programmatic Equity, by FRPL Levels

Page 52: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —47

Page 53: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —48

Resource and Programmatic Equity for Student Needs, by ELL Level

Page 54: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —49

Resource and Programmatic Equity, by Locale

Page 55: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —50

Page 56: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —51

Transparency, by Geographic Isolation

Page 57: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —52

Transparency, by Neighbor Island Status

Transparency of Mixed Schools

Page 58: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —53

Transparency, by Elementary School Size

Page 59: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —54

Transparency, by Middle School Size

Transparency, by High School Size

Page 60: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —55

Transparency, by FRPL Level

Transparency, by ELL Level

Page 61: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —56

Transparency, by Locale

Accountability, by Geographic Isolation

Page 62: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —57

Accountability, by Neighbor Island Status

Page 63: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —58

Accountability of Mixed Schools

Page 64: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —59

Accountability, by Elementary School Size

Page 65: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —60

Accountability, by Middle School Size

Page 66: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —61

Accountability, by High School Size

Page 67: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —62

Accountability, by FRPL Level

Page 68: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —63

Accountability, by ELL Level

Page 69: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —64

Accountability, by Locale

Page 70: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —65

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by Geographic Isolation

Page 71: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —66

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by Neighbor Island Status

Page 72: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —67

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings of Mixed Schools

Page 73: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —68

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by Elementary School Size

Page 74: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —69

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by Middle School Size

Page 75: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —70

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by High School Size

Page 76: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —71

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by FRPL Level

Page 77: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —72

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by ELL Level

Page 78: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —73

Frequency and Advance Notice of SCC Meetings, by Locale

Page 79: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —74

Page 80: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —75

SCC Engagement, by Geographic Isolation

SCC Engagement, by Neighboring Island Status

Page 81: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —76

SCC Engagement of Mixed Schools

SCC Engagement, by Elementary School Size

Page 82: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —77

SCC Engagement, by Middle School Size

SCC Engagement, by High School Size

Page 83: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —78

SCC Engagement, by FRPL Level

SCC Engagement, by ELL Level

Page 84: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —79

SCC Engagement, by Locale

Faculty Engagement, by Geographic Isolation

Page 85: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —80

Faculty Engagement, by Neighbor Island Status

Faculty Engagement of Mixed Schools

Page 86: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —81

Faculty Engagement, by Elementary School Size

Faculty Engagement, by Middle School Size

Page 87: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —82

Faculty Engagement, by High School Size

Faculty Engagement, by FRPL Level

Page 88: Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula

American Institutes for Research Evaluation of Hawaii’s Weighted Student Formula Technical Appendix —83

Faculty Engagement, by ELL Level

Faculty Engagement, by Locale