evaluating phytoremediation of lead-contaminated soils in

24
Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in Lo‘i Agriculture Ryan Ueunten Master’s of Environmental Management, NREM Capstone Panel: Dr. Susan Crow, Dr. Creighton M. Litton, Dr. Noa Lincoln 1

Upload: others

Post on 12-Jun-2022

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated

Soils in Lo‘i Agriculture

Ryan Ueunten

Master’s of Environmental Management, NREM

Capstone Panel: Dr. Susan Crow, Dr. Creighton M. Litton, Dr. Noa Lincoln

1

Page 2: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Motivation - Lo‘i Agriculture

Irrigated pondfieldKalo

(taro, Colocasia esculenta)

“Huli ka lima i lalo”

(Turn hands downward)

2

Page 3: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Motivation - Lead (Pb) Contamination in Soil

● Lo‘i agriculture in degraded areas

● Pb toxicity

● Contaminated kalo and soil

3Students planting in loʻi

Page 4: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Background - Phytoremediation

● “Intentional cultivation of plants to clean

contaminated environments” (Tangahu

et al. 2011)

Uptake through roots

Pb2+ contaminants

Contaminant storage

in biomass

Phytoextraction

Translocation through

shoots

● Phytoextraction

4

Page 5: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Capstone Objective

Results can assist kalo farmers, cultural practitioners, and community members

“Assess if phytoremediation is a potential solution for

remediating soil Pb contamination in lo‘i agriculture.”

5

Page 6: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Research Questions

1. Which plants are more effective at uptaking bioavailable Pb in lo‘i soils?

2. Which parts of each plant (roots or shoots) accumulate the most Pb?

3. How many rounds of phytoremediation are needed to reduce soil Pb concentrations

to a safe level?

6

Page 7: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Approach - In situ Experiment

7

● Ulupō heiau

○ Kailua, O‘ahu

○ Pohakupu silty clay loam (Fine, parasesquic, isohyperthermic Oxic Humustepts)

○ Non-profit organization:

○ Former dumping site

Trash found in lo‘i site

● Three phytoremediation plantings

Page 8: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea)

● Widely studied plant

● 8 weeks of growth

8

Page 9: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

‘Ae‘ae (Bacopa monnieri)

● Native wetland plant

● Not well studied

● 5 months of growth

9

Page 10: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Control Plants

● Mix of weedy species

● 8 weeks of growth

PC:

https://www.wildflower.org/plants/result.php?id_plant=LUOC

Nutsedge

(Cyperus rotundus)

Honohono grass

(Commelina diffusa)

Mexican primrose

(Ludwigia octovalvis)

10

Page 11: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

A1 Control

A3 ‘Ae‘ae

A4 ‘Ae‘ae

A5 Control

A6 Control

A7 Indian Mustard

A8 Indian Mustard

A9 Indian Mustard

A2 ‘Ae‘ae

Approach - Experimental Layout

● 3 lo‘i plots per planting

Indian Mustard

Control

11

‘Ae‘ae

Page 12: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Collect post planting

soil samples

Collect plant biomass

samples

4Plant the plants!

2Collect pre planting

soil samples

1

Approach - Experimental Design

Remove plants

3

12

Page 13: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Results - Biomass Growth per Day

13

● Most growth = Control plants

● No surprise

● Poor drainage

Page 14: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

b

b

b

a

b

b

● Highest Pb conc. = ‘Ae‘ae roots

(Tukey HSD Test; P < 0.001)

14

Results - Biomass Pb Concentrations

Page 15: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Results - Total Pb Uptake per Day

15

ab

b

a

● Pb uptake = biomass growth × Pb conc.

● ‘Ae‘ae > Indian mustard

(Tukey HSD Test; P < 0.001)

○ Roots

● Flooded conditions (reduced)

○ ⬆ redox potential = ⬆ mobile

Pb

● Control?

Page 16: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Results - Soil Pb Concentrations

● No differences

● ⬆ spatial variability?

● ⬇ sampling intensity?

● ⬆ immobile Pb

● 0.1-2.2% bioavailable Pb

(Huang et al. 1997;

Bouquet et al. 2017)

16

Page 17: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Results - Estimated Rounds of Phytoremediation

● Safe soil level = 0-75 mg/kg Pb

● 1,000-120,000 rounds

● 100-18,000 years

17

Page 18: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Discussion - Is Phytoremediation Effective?

● Best candidate = ‘Ae‘ae

18

‘Ae‘ae biomass and sample

○ Native plant!

● Overall, not practical

● Mobile Pb vs Immobile Pb

● Need other methods

PC: https://horriem.com/back-to-the-drawing-board-great

Page 19: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Discussion - Alternative Methods

● Try other plants

● Adding chelating agents

○ Increase bioavailable Pb

● Deploying microbes

● Soil Removal + Phytoremediation

19

Collecting biomass samples

PC: Jordan Gestrich

Page 20: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Acknowledgements

1. University of Hawai‘i Mānoa, CTAHR

○ Dr. Susan Crow, Dr. Noa Lincoln, Dr. Creighton Litton

○ Dr. Rebecca Prescott

○ Amazing peers

2. Hau‘oli Mau Loa Foundation

3. Kauluakalana

4. Friends and family

20

Page 21: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

Mahalo!Questions?

21

Page 22: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

ReferencesTaro Security and Purity Task Force (TSPTF). 2009. E ola hou nā kalo; ho‘i hou ka ‘āina lē‘ia Taro security and purity task force 2010. Legislative report.

Honolulu, HI.

Bremer L, Faliniski K., Ching C., Wada C., Burnett K., Kukea-Shultz K, Reppun N., Chun G., Oleson K., Ticktin T. 2018. Biocultural restoration of traditional

agriculture: cultural, environmental, and economic outcomes of lo‘i kalo restoration of He‘eia, O‘ahu. Sustainability. 10(12): 4502.

Handy E. & Handy E. 1991. Native planters of old. Bishop Museum Press. Honolulu, HI.

Levin P. 2015. Ch.4 Lessons from the taro patch, in Thinking like an island. University of Hawai‘i Press. Honolulu, HI.

Kagawa-Viviani A., Levin P., Johnston E., Ooka J., Baker J., Kantar M., Lincoln N. 2018. I ke ēwe ‘āina o ke kupuna: Hawaiian ancestral crops in perspective.

Sustainability. 10(12): 4607.

Beckwith M. 1970. Hawaiian Mythology. University of Hawai‘i Press. Honolulu, HI.

Kurashima N., Fortini L., Ticktin T. 2019. The potential of indigenous agricultural food production under climate change in Hawaiʻi. Nature Sustainability. 2:191–

199.

Ladefoged T., Kirch P., Gon S., Chadwick O., Hartshorn A., Vitousek P. 2009. Opportunities and constraints for intensive agriculture in the Hawaiian archipelago

prior to European contact. Journal of Archaeological Science. 36: 2374–2383.

Levin P. 2015. Ch.3 Searching for sustainable agriculture in Hawai‘i, in Thinking like an island. University of Hawai‘i Press. Honolulu, HI.

Evans D. 2008. Taro mauka to makai. 2nd edition. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. 22

Page 23: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

ReferencesCho J., Yamakawa R., Hollyer J. 2007. Hawaiian kalo, past and future. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. Sustainable Agriculture. 1: 1-8.

Hawai‘i State Department of Health (HDOH). 2017. Final Lead in Soils Fact Sheet.

Sutherland R. and Tolosa C. 2001. Variation in total and extractable elements with distance from roads in an urban watershed, Honolulu, Hawaii. Water, Air, and

Soil Pollution. 127: 315–338.0.

Dixit R., Wasiullah, Malaviya D., Pandiyan K., Singh U., Sahu A., Shukla R., Singh B., Rai J., Sharma P., Lade H., Diby P. 2015. Bioremediation of heavy metals

from soil and aquatic environment: an overview of principles and criteria of fundamental processes. Sustainability. 7: 2189-2212.

Hawai‘i State Department of Health (HDOH). 2018. New guidelines: Childhood lead poisoning Prevention.

Islam S., Kashem A., Osman K.T. 2016. Phytoextraction efficiency of lead by arum (Colocasia esculenta L.) grown in soil. International Journal of Soil Science.

11(4): 130-136.

Tangahu B., Abdullah S., Basri H., Idris M., Anuar N., Mukhlisin M. 2011. A review on heavy metals (As, Pb, and Hg) uptake by plants through

phytoremediation. International Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2011:1-31.

Henry J. 2000. An overview of the phytoremediation of lead and mercury. National Network of Environmental Management Studies. Prepared for: U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency.

Jabeen R., Ahmad A., Iqbal M. 2009. Phytoremediation of heavy metals: physiological and molecular mechanisms. Botanical Review. 75(4): 339-364.

23

Page 24: Evaluating Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils in

ReferencesSalido A., Hasty K., Lim J-M., Butcher D. 2003. Phytoremediation of Arsenic and Lead in Contaminated Soil Using Chinese Brake Ferns (Pteris vittata) and Indian Mustard

(Brassica juncea). International Journal of Phytoremediation. 5(2): 89-103.

Huang J., Chen J., Berti W., Cunningham S. 1997. Phytoremediation of lead contaminated soils: role of synthetic chelates in lead phytoextraction. Environmental Science

Technology. 31(3):800-805.

Bouquet D., Braud A., Lebeau T. 2017. Brassica juncea tested on urban soils moderately contaminated by lead: Origin of contamination and effect of chelates. International Journal

of Phytoremediation. 19(5): 425-430.

Hue N. 2013. Arsenic chemistry and remediation in Hawaiian soils. International Journal of Phytoremediation. 15(2): 105-116.

Paquin D., Campbell S., Li Q. 2004. Phytoremediation in Subtropical Hawaii - A Review of Over 100 Plant Species. Remediation Journal. 14(2): 127-139.

Sinha S. 1999. Accumulation of Cu, Cd, Cr, Mn, and Pb from artificially contaminated soil by Bacopa monnieri. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 57: 253-264.

Prescott R. 2018. Preliminary soil Pb concentrations of Ulupō site. Unpublished raw data.

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), US Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2019. Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1996. Method 3050B: acid digestion of sediments, sludges, and soils. Revision 2. Washington, DC.

R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.

Oviedo C. & Rodriguez J. 2003. EDTA: The chelating agent under environmental scrutiny. Quim. Nova. 26(6): 901-905.

24