europeancommission carbon, food security and sustainable development carbon, food security and...

10
European Commission Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development MRV systems for carbon in soils and vegetation: a development perspective Philip Mikos, Head of Philip Mikos, Head of Unit Unit Sustainable Management of Sustainable Management of Natural Resources Natural Resources DG EuropeAid Development DG EuropeAid Development and Co-operation and Co-operation 26th January 2011 26th January 2011

Upload: molly-parsons

Post on 27-Mar-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EuropeanCommission Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development MRV systems for carbon in soils

European Commission

Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable

DevelopmentDevelopment

MRV systems for carbon in soils and

vegetation:

a development perspective

Philip Mikos, Head of Philip Mikos, Head of UnitUnitSustainable Management of Sustainable Management of Natural ResourcesNatural ResourcesDG EuropeAid Development DG EuropeAid Development

and Co-operationand Co-operation

26th January 201126th January 2011

Page 2: EuropeanCommission Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development MRV systems for carbon in soils

European Commission

Development framework

EU food security policy

Role of smallholders

Key issues for agriculture:

Sustainable development and agriculture

Agriculture and carbon

Agriculture and mitigation

Maximising development outcome

Page 3: EuropeanCommission Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development MRV systems for carbon in soils

European Commission

EU Policy ObjectivesEU Policy Objectives

Framework of the MDGs

Inclusive Growth, leading to poverty reduction

Food Security

Sustainable Development

Human Development

COM (2010) 629. EU development policy in support of inclusive growth and sustainable development (green paper)

COM (2010) 127. An EU policy framework to assist developing countries in addressing food security challenges.

Page 4: EuropeanCommission Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development MRV systems for carbon in soils

European Commission

Food Security Policy: 2010 CommunicationFood Security Policy: 2010 Communication

Ensuring a more comprehensive approach to address food security challenges in developing countries

In rural and urban areas

Across all 4 pillars:

1) Increasing availability of food

2) Improving access to food

3) Improving nutritional adequacy of food intake

4) Enhancing crisis prevention and management

Recognising that strategies need to be country-owned and country-specific

Page 5: EuropeanCommission Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development MRV systems for carbon in soils

European Commission

Smallholders are central to the Food Security Smallholders are central to the Food Security PolicyPolicy

Sustainable small-scale food production as a main focal area of EU assistance:

Ecologically efficient intensification

Value chain approach (with due attention to financing, processing and markets)

Governance is key - particularly around land

Demand-driven research and innovation (incl. CC adaptation)

Reducing post-harvest losses

Regional integration

Page 6: EuropeanCommission Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development MRV systems for carbon in soils

European Commission

Key issues in Sustainable DevelopmentKey issues in Sustainable Development

Climate change: combining mitigation requirements with adaptation needs

Biodiversity: reducing losses

Access to energy

Managing forests and wetlands

Ecosystem services

Conserving and efficiently managing land and water resources

Limiting environmental pollution

Page 7: EuropeanCommission Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development MRV systems for carbon in soils

European Commission

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

19

82

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

year

pe

rce

nta

ge

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

rainfall variation around the mean

GDP growth

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

19

82

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

year

pe

rce

nta

ge

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

rainfall variation around the mean

GDP growth

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

19

82

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

year

pe

rce

nta

ge

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

rainfall variation around the mean

GDP growth

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

19

82

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

year

pe

rce

nta

ge

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

rainfall variation around the mean

GDP growth

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

19

79

19

80

19

81

19

82

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

Years

Real

GD

P g

row

th (

%)

-4.0

-3.0

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

Vari

ab

ilit

y i

n R

ain

fall

(M

ete

r)

Real GDP grow th (%)

Variability in Rainfall (Meter)

Ethiopia 1982-2000

ZWE 1978-1993

Rainfall & GDP growth

Source World Bank, WDR 2008

Page 8: EuropeanCommission Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development MRV systems for carbon in soils

European Commission

Carbon and sustainable developmentCarbon and sustainable development

Natural synergy between mitigation and development:

Carbon held in soils and vegetation limits CO2 emissions

Richer forests provide more resources for sustainable management and multiple use

Carbon in soils increases water and nutrient holding capacity and resistance to erosion

Richer soils and vegetation provide better ecosystem services (e.g. water supply from upland catchments)

Developing countries have most potential for mitigation by agriculture, avoided deforestation or land use change

Poor smallholder farmers, pastoralists and forest dwellers manage carbon sources and sinks

Page 9: EuropeanCommission Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development MRV systems for carbon in soils

European Commission

Agriculture significant emitter of GHGs C sequestration potential in soilsLargest potential in developing countries

The poor farmer has an extremely low carbon footprint

Poorest as custodians of public goods – soils and forests

Mitigation as a co-benefit of development (incentivise carbon friendly practices)

Market-based incentives should be accessible to, and not disadvantage, smallholder farmers

Synergies exist between mitigation, adaptation and development – but trade-offs may need to be made

Mitigation must be development led Mitigation must be development led

Page 10: EuropeanCommission Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development Carbon, Food Security and Sustainable Development MRV systems for carbon in soils

European Commission

How to Maximise Development OutcomesHow to Maximise Development Outcomes

A clear rationaleUnderstanding of benefits. More C = more productive soils = improved food security (+ adaptive capacity)

Net reduction of GHG emissions is a global public good

A straightforward methodology for MRVCost effective and easy to apply in developing countries

Link to international standards

Link to monitoring of development outcomes

An equitable incentive mechanismBenefiting poor smallholders/ forest dwellers / pastoralists

Safeguards to prevent elite capture

Subsidy or market based?