european research funders and data sharing: an overview of current practices
TRANSCRIPT
European Research Funders and data sharing:
anoverview of
current practices
Angus Whyte, DCC‘EUDAT Data Acess and Reuse
Policy Working Group Workshop November 11-12
2014
Helping to build capacity, capability and skills in data management and
curation across the UK’s higher education
research community
RDM Service ‘Components’
www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides/how-develop-rdm-services
RDM Service ‘Components’
www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides/how-develop-rdm-services
Guidance on UK Funder Policies
http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/datapolicy/
UK Funder Policy Overview
http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/policy-and-legal/overview-funders-data-policies
ec.europa.eu/research/era/eraprogress_en.htm
Do funders support open data?
“Among those Member States whose funders support it, the average share of funding organisations frequently supporting it is 28.1 %”
What kinds of ‘sticks’?
Q. Do most of the national funders
• State their policy on OA to research data?
• Expect a data management plan?
• Mandate sharing in repository?
• Monitor DMP submitted or data deposited?
A. ● Common ◑ Occasional ○ Rare or never
What kinds of ‘carrots’?
Q. Do most of the national funders
• Offer guidance, tools, support staff?
• Support a data repository?
• State costs will be met?
• Offer rewards through funding or assessment?
A. ● Common ◑ Occasional ○ Rare or never
Other sources of Information
• Int’l Federation of Data Organizations for Social Science (IFDO) Report ‘ Policies for Sharing Research Data in Social Sciences and Humanities’http://ifdo.org/wordpress/?p=532
• SIM4RDM Landscape Report• APARSEN d35. Exemplar Good Governance Structures
and Data Policies• January ’15 RECODE D5 Policy guidelines for open access
and data dissemination and preservation “…review relevant open access and data dissemination and preservation policies at the European and Member State level and in third countries. It will identify policy gaps…”
Selected EUDAT member countries’ funder policies
● Common ◑ Occasional ○ Rare or never
Policy DMP Deposit Monitor Guides Repos Costs Reward
AT ◑ ○ ◑ ○ ○ ◑ ○ ○
CZ ○ ○ ○ ○ ◑ ◑ ○ ○
FI ● ● ○ ● ● ● ◑ ○
FR ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ◑ ○ ○
DE ◑ ◑ ◑ ○ ◑ ● ● ○
IT ◑ ○ ● ○ ○ ● ○ ○
ND ◑ ◑ ◑ ◑ ● ● ◑ ○
NO ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ○
PL ● ○ ○ ○ ○ ● ○ ○
ES ● ○ ○ ○ ○ ● ● ○
SE ○ ◑ ○ ○ ● ● ○ ○
CH ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
UK ● ● ◑ ◑ ● ● ● ○
Some observations
Repositories supported across all 13
DMPs expected in 6 of 13 countries
Monitoring in only 4 countries
Rewards are rare
What is and should be monitored?
Was DMP submitted with research bid?
6/7
Does plan meet quality criteria and needs of the project?
6/7
Was data shared from the project as planned?
2/7
Number of UK Research Council
What is and should be monitored?
Data plan submitted with research bid?
6/7 funders
Does plan meet quality criteria and needs of the project? *
5/7
Was data shared from the project as planned?
2/7
Number of UK Research Council
* e.g. Medical Research Councilhttp://www.mrc.ac.uk/documents/pdf/data-management-plans-guidance-for-reviewers/
What kinds of reward?
Specific funding streams for data sharing or reuse?
e.g. UK Biotechnology and Biology Sciencies (BBSRC)•Tools and Resources Development Fund •Bioinformatics and Biological Resources Fund
What kinds of reward?
Specific funding streams for data sharing or reuse?
e.g.UK Biotechnology and Biology Sciencies (BBSRC)•Tools and Resources Development Fund •Bioinformatics and Biological Resources Fund
Credit in research assessment?
e.g. UK Research Excellence Framework 2014•Case studies on impact beyond academia•Research environment information
What about trust?
What policies build trust in RO’s support services?
– Trust certification to promote trust in repositories
– How should RO’s help local domain RDM scale up?