ethics in professional fields of practice the … · ethics in professional fields of practice the...
TRANSCRIPT
ETHICS IN PROFESSIONAL FIELDS OF PRACTICE
THE TAX PRACTITIONERWEBINAR 2. 25 August 2017
Presented by Adv Werner Bouwer
AGENDA
AGENDA
PRESENTATION 1 - THE THINKING…
WELCOME & INTRODUCTION
PREVIOUS SESSION RECAP
INFLUENCE OF CULTURE ON ETHICAL DECISION MAKING PROCESS
COMPLIANCE & THE LAW
RATIONALISATION
WHAT TO DO WHEN CONFRONTED WITH TAX EVASION … THE LAW
INFLUENCE OF CULTURE ON ETHICAL DECISION MAKING
‘… compliance is there to reinforce
culture and it also demonstrates why
those who advocate a paper
compliance program are wrong. It is
the doing compliance, not simply
having it on paper, that makes it all
work.’ Tom Fox – 10 Feb ‘17
DEFINITION OF CULTURE:It is the “pattern of responses discovered,
developed or invented during the group’s history of
handling problems …
These responses are considered the correct way to
perceive, feel, think and act … Culture determines
what is acceptable or unacceptable, … right or
wrong, …’
Thank You for Being Late, Thomas Friedman
INFLUENCE OF CULTURE ON REPUTATION OF YOUR PROFESSION?
DEFINITION OF CULTURE:It is the “pattern of responses discovered, developed or invented during the group’s history of handling
problems which arise from the interaction of its members, and between them and their environment.
These responses are considered the correct way to perceive, feel, think and act, and are passed on to
new members through immersion and teaching. Culture determines what is acceptable or unacceptable,
important or unimportant, right or wrong, workable or unworkable.”
Thank You for Being Late, Thomas Friedman
KING IVTM
Culture – how things are really done around here, not how it is said to be done
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LAW & CULTURE
‘… compliance is there to reinforce culture and it also demonstrates why those who advocate a paper
compliance program are wrong. It is the doing compliance, not simply having it on paper, that makes it all
work.’ Tom Fox – 10 Feb ‘17
MFMA has the strongest criminal measures against malfeasance. Yet, municipalities have the most qualified
audit reports. Very little prosecutions ito MFMA, after 14 years.
PFMA: Took the NPA approximately 15 years of endless reports on billions of irregular expenditure year on
year; to muster the courage for the 1st prosecution.
PRECCA is one of the strongest pieces of anti-corruption legislation in the world. Yet, after 13 years, there
are not one name reflected on the Register of Tender Defaulters …
With the World Bank audits, we get full marks for having the rules on AML. Yet, we flunk the walk the talk
test.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LAW & CULTURE
The ‘Rule of Law’ concept does not refer
to whether the law itself exists. Its
existence is merely the 1st step.
Rule of Law means how that what there
is, is applied.
The fearless but fair application of the law -
Is the ‘doing’ part setting the example
Is the ‘pattern of responses discovered,
developed or invented’
Determines what the public perceives
are right or wrong.
That is why ethical pioneers are all ad idem -The law’s existence does not help – if no-one does nothing, there ‘is nothing’ (SCOPA Chair)
Biggest barrier to root out corruption is the sense of impunity of some (Madonsela)
RATIONALISATION IS A SLIPPERY SLIDE
Easy to think – but everybody is doing it.
Easy to point and blame ….Some questions …
1.3 The member also has duties to the country and the
fiscus, notably of compliance with the law and the honest presentation of taxpayer client’s
affairs.
WHAT TO DO WHEN CONFRONTED WITH TAX EVASION? REPORTING DUTY?
1.7 Members must comply with statutory duties of legal disclosure where they have proof or
suspicions of criminal activity.
4.17 Members must maintain the confidentiality of their employer and clients and should not
disclose information to a third party without an employer or client’s permission, unless there is
a legal obligation to do so.
235. Criminal offences relating to evasion of tax.(1) A person who with intent to evade or to assist another person to evade tax or to obtain an undue refund
under a tax Act—
a) makes or causes or allows to be made any false statement or entry in a return or other document, or signs
a statement, return or other document so submitted without reasonable grounds for believing the same to
be true;
b) gives a false answer, whether orally or in writing, to a request for information made under this Act
c) prepares, maintains or authorises the preparation or maintenance of false books of account or other
records or falsifies or authorises the falsification of books of account or other records;
d) makes use of, or authorises the use of, fraud or contrivance; or
e) makes any false statement for the purposes of obtaining any refund of or exemption from tax,
is guilty of an offence and, upon conviction, is subject to a fine or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding
five years.
THE TAA – S 235 (1)
THE TAA – S 235 (3)
(3) A senior SARS official may lay a complaint with the South
African Police Service or the National Prosecuting Authority
regarding an offence contemplated in subsection (1).
(2) Any person who makes a
statement in the manner referred to in
subsection (1) must, unless the person
proves that there is a reasonable
possibility that he or she was ignorant
of the falsity of the statement and that
the ignorance was not due to
negligence on his or her part, be
regarded as guilty of the offence
referred to subsection (1).
THE TAA – S 235 (2)
The suspect carries the burden to prove the
absence of culpability. Must prove two things
(cumulatively) –
1 – he/she was ignorant of the lie
2 – ignorance was not due to negligence on
his/her part.
Negligence – the bonus paterfamilias test (or
reasonable person in his / her shoes).
4.5 Members must not knowingly be associated with reports,
returns, communications or other information where he/she
believes that the information:
4.5.1 contains a materially false or misleading statement;
4.5.2 contains statements or information furnished
recklessly;
4.5.3 omits or obscures information required to be included
where such omission or obscurity would be misleading.
When a tax ‘registered practitioner’ becomes aware that the
above has occurred he must cease to represent the taxpayer
concerned if the taxpayer does not remedy the situation.
WHAT TO DO WHEN CONFRONTED WITH TAX EVASION? OTHER?
4.12 This Code explain the position of
members if a client refuses to act in
accordance with the member’s advice,
for example where the client has
unreasonably delayed either the
production of information needed for the
preparation of returns or accounts or full
disclosure of irregularities. The member
should consider whether to continue to
act for the client but should note the
recommendations contained in the
Code regarding termination of
relationships with the client.
4.11 A member should deal
with taxation work only on
the basis that the client is
prepared to make full
disclosure to him. Such
disclosures are governed by
confidentiality as an implied
contractual term.
SHOULD A PRACTITIONER INVESTIGATE ALL DISCLOSURES OF CLIENT FOR THE TRUTH?
4.26 Members must keep proper working papers and
files of professional work done to support, for
example, the tax return, opinion and other advice
given. Members must comply with the SA Tax
Standards. It is also compulsory to perform a critical
evaluation and apply professional scepticism to the
information submitted to the member. For example, a
member should scrutinise the bank statements of
client taxpayers’ for completeness of income declared.
SHOULD A PRACTITIONER INVESTIGATE ALL DISCLOSURES OF CLIENT FOR THE TRUTH?
Suspicion = ‘state of
conjecture or surmise where
proof is lacking. ‘I think but I
cannot prove …’
It is the starting point of an
investigation ….’ SCA case
Professional scepticism =
‘attitude that includes a questioning mind,
being alert to conditions which may
indicate possible misstatement due to error
or fraud, and a critical assessment of …
evidence’.
Value judgment / case by case basis / professional judgment …
Investigation = ‘… to determine the truth …’
4.36 Members must consider the money
laundering statutory reporting
requirements. Where members become
aware of tax irregularities, they must
consider that under the money
laundering legislation, fiscal offences can
amount to money laundering and act
appropriately.
4.38 A member who has knowledge of
or reasonable grounds for suspecting
money laundering must consider
whether he has an obligation to make
a report to the appropriate authorities.
THE PRACTITIONER & ML
SUSPICIOUS AND UNUSUAL TRANSACTIONS (SECTION 29)
S 29 – Suspicious and Unusual (STR) Any person who carries on, is in charge, manages or is employed
at a business What they suspect, or ought reasonably to have suspected
Inter alia transaction that
> has no apparent business or lawful purpose
> will facilitate the transfer of unlawful proceeds
> is conducted to avoid a reporting duty
> is relevant in respect of investigation of offence ito TAA.
S 28 – Cash - CTRWho? Accountable
& Reporting Institutions
Any CTR above R25 000
Any series of CTRs individually below
R25 000, but forms the same
series, and collectively
exceeds R25k
Werner BouwerDirector: Nexus Forensics & Nexus Training Academy
SASSETA accredited Facilitator & ModeratorMobile: 082 419 1262Tel: +27 12 664 5568Fax: +27 12 664 0307
e-mail: [email protected]
www.nexusforensics.co.za