ethical analysis of us healthcare 2009 ethical evaluation of u.s. health care james a. foster, ph.d...
TRANSCRIPT
Ethical analysis of US healthcare 2009
Ethical Evaluation of U.S. Health Care
James A. Foster, Ph.D
Professor, Biological Sciences and PhilosophyInitiative for Bioinformatics & Evolutionary STudies (IBEST)
Ethical analysis of US healthcare JAF © 2009
How to analyze ethics?
1. Ask “normative” questions• Is the current U.S. health care system ethically acceptable?
• Is the proposed U.S. health care system ethically acceptable?
2. Identify major affected parties
3. Score questions for each party with respect to major ethical categories
• Well being and happiness
• Liberty, autonomy, independence
• Justice, fairness✦ Summarize results, identify caveats
Ethical analysis of US healthcare JAF © 2009
2. Major affected parties
People• Americans with adequate insurance• Americans without adequate insurance• Health care providers (doctors, nurses,
pharmacists, psychologists, etc.) Institutions
• Health delivery groups- The medical profession- Hospitals, care delivery centers
• Economic groups- Employers/employees- Insurance companies- Pharmaceuticals/suppliers
• Governments
Ethical analysis of US healthcare JAF © 2009
3. Score each item (extract)
Is the current health care system in the US ethically acceptable?
Party Well Being Liberty JusticeAmerican/w adequate insurance
•most expensive in world (16% GDP)•very low quality (WHO: 37/191 performance; 72/191 outcomes)•1st in responsiveness (WHO)
•treatment dictated by insurance policies•few choices for insurance or treatment (lack of interstate competition; few providers)
•Leaves out 47 million
Americans without adequate insurance
•leading cause of bankruptcy44,000 deaths/yr
•Little choice over insurance or provider
•116 million inadequate insurance
Health care providers (doctors, psychologists, nurses, etc.)
•family doctors, nurses poorly paid, overworked •overworked specialists (very) well paid
•time skewed to paperwork•incentives to over testing •can only accept patients with adequate insurance
•poor and rural areas underserved•vast disparity in quality of available services
Insurance companies
•high profits •near total choice of what to cover
•high profits, especially to executives and lobbyists
Conclusion: highly unethical unless business rights dominate
Ethical analysis of US healthcare JAF © 2009
3. Score each item (extract)Is the proposed US health care system ethically acceptable?
Party Well Being Liberty JusticeHealth care providers
•more personal fulfillment•reward for outcomes•less demand/profit for some specialty services
•freedom to choose type and location of practice•Can’t refuse treatment based on ability to pay
•less disparity between different types of practice•less disparity in quality/availability of services
Employers/employees
•reduced expense•fewer bankruptcies•happier, more productive employees
•choice of health insurance providers ("public option")•Can’t refuse to provide benefits
•even playing field for small businesses
Insurance companies
•more incentive for efficiency•reduced profits
•less choice of what to cover and to what extent
•more competition ("public option")
Governments •reduced budget deficit (short term, state, long term, federal)•ability to reallocate state funds to education, infrastructure, etc.•federal deficit (short term)
•more flexibility in priorities•ability to “opt out”
•poor and rural states disproportionately benefit(note: good for Idaho, though unjust)
Conclusion: moderately ethical unless corporate rights dominate
Ethical analysis of US healthcare JAF © 2009
Is the current health care system in the US ethically acceptable?
YES (11) NO (31)
Ethical analysis of US healthcare JAF © 2009
Is the proposed US health care system ethically acceptable?
YES (45) NO (16)
Ethical analysis of US healthcare JAF © 2009
5. Summarize
Current system is clearly unethicalProposed system is ethically superior to
current systemCaveats: we are assuming that
• Individual and small business liberty (“choice”) and well being are more important than other considerations
• Individual liberty, well-being, and justice are more important than corporate autonomy
• Insurance company well-being is not the most important consideration