erratum
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Erratum](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020618/575097d41a28abbf6bd6d4b4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
99
Erratum
Health Policy, 17 (1991) 3950
The feasibility of additive conjoint measurement in measuring utilities in breast cancer patients
C.G. Verhoef, A. Maas, L.J.A. Stalpers, A.L.M. Verbeek, Th. Wobbes and W.A.J. van Daal
The last line of page 41 should read:
is preferred to (C,D), then this implies that (A,F) is preferred to (C,E).