erosion modeling and sand management with ansys cfd · pdf fileerosion modeling and sand...

Download Erosion Modeling and Sand Management with ANSYS CFD · PDF fileErosion Modeling and Sand Management with ANSYS CFD . ... Particle Model Fluid ... Full 3D – Wall Effects and

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: hakiet

Post on 06-Feb-2018

240 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 1

    Erosion Modeling and Sand Management with ANSYS CFD

    Madhusuden Agrawal

    ANSYS Houston

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 2

    Particulate modeling in ANSYS CFD

    Sand Control and Sand Management

    Sand Filtration Sand Transport in pipelines Proppant Placement

    Erosion Modeling

    Challenges in Erosion Modeling Key components of erosion modeling ANSYS solution for erosion modeling Erosion Module Examples

    OUTLINE

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 3

    Recap: Particulate Modeling

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 4

    Spans wide range of

    Length scales Time scales

    Physics

    Particulate physics Fluid particle interaction Particle size distribution Homogenous and

    heterogeneous reaction

    Particle structure interaction

    Challenges in Particulate Modeling

    From: Fundamental of Multiphase Flow, C. E. Brennen

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 5

    Particulate Flows Regimes Diluted vs. Dense Flow

    es

    t12/tcol

    10-3 10-1 10-5 10-7

    104

    102

    100

    10-2

    dilute dense

    101 102 100 (x1-x2)/dp

    4-way coupling

    2-way coupling

    1-way coupling

    Particles reduce

    turbulence

    Particles enhance

    turbulence negligible effect on

    turbulence

    102

    100

    10-2

    t12/teddy

    Dilute Dense Relative motion between particles Large Small

    Particle-particle interaction Weak Strong

    Apparent viscosity of the solid phase

    Particle-fluid

    interactions

    Particle-particle

    interaction

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 6

    Modeling Particulate Flow

    Particle Phase

    Particle size

    P-P Interaction

    Fluid-P Interaction

    Eulerian

    Lagrangian

    Sub grid scale

    Super grid scale

    Hybrid

    Resolved

    Modeled

    Resolved

    Modeled

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 7

    Platform for Simulating Particulate Systems

    ANSYS CFD provides a platform which can adapt to the multi-physics, multi-components and multi-scale configurations of particulate flows and their industrial applications

    Eulerian Granular

    MPM DDPM-DEM DPM

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 9

    Models for Particulate Flows Model Numerical

    approach Particle fluid interaction

    Particle-Particle interaction

    Particle size distribution

    DPM Fluid Eulerian Particles Lagrangian

    Empirical models for sub-grid particles

    Particles are treated as points

    Easy to include PSD because of Lagrangian description

    DDPM - KTGF Fluid Eulerian Particles Lagrangian

    Empirical; sub-grid particles

    Approximate P-P interactions determined by granular models

    Easy to include PSD because of Lagrangian description

    DDPM - DEM Fluid Eulerian Particles Lagrangian

    Empirical; sub-grid particles

    Accurate determination of P-P interactions.

    Can account for all PSD physics accurately including geometric effects

    Euler Granular model

    Fluid Eulerian Particles Eulerian

    Empirical; sub-grid particles

    P-P interactions modeled by fluid properties, such as granular pressure, viscosity, drag etc.

    Different phases to account for a PSD; when size change operations happen use population balance models

    Macroscopic Particle Model

    Fluid Eulerian Particles Lagrangian

    Interactions determined as part of solution; particles span many fluid cells

    Accurate determination of P-P interactions.

    Easy to include PSD; if particles become smaller than the mesh, uses an empiricial model

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 10

    Sand Control

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 11

    Sand is often produced in both onshore and offshore production systems Sand production may be continuous, or sudden

    The sediment consists mud, sand and scale picked up during the transport of the oil

    Sand Management is important in oil production to ensure system integrity and efficiency

    Excessive sand leads to Partial or complete blockage of flowlines Enhanced pipe bottom corrosion and erosion Trapping of pigs Reduced production time and increased maintenance and operating costs

    Sedimentation in Oil & Gas

    Internal flow of natural gas containing sand particles. particle trajectories are colored in grey. The erosive wear hotspots on the piping is colored out in red.

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 12

    Sand control strategies

    Preventing formation failure Sand exclusion techniques Sand management

    Sand Control

    Key areas to understand fundamental nature of sand in the reservoir and the wellbore

    Hydraulic fracturing (Proppant transport)

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 13

    Sand Exclusion Techniques

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 14

    Sand control screen systems

    Screens Gravel and frac packing

    Example: Sand Filtering Systems in O&G

    Bulk process Surface process

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 15

    Euler Granular Model

    Porous media model with physical velocity formulation Low permeability for the particulate phase May not be able to simulate particle size dependent filtering

    Particulate Models

    DDPM model with DEM closure for particle-particle interaction Particles can be stopped by reflect or trap boundary conditions Can model particle size effects. Macro Particle Model will physically filter particles through

    pores

    Modeling Filtration with ANSYS

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 16

    Euler Granular Model for Filtration

    t = 16 sec.

    t = 100 sec.

    t = 135 sec.

    t = 60 sec.

    Solid Phase Volume Faction Contours Velocity Vectors of Solid Phase

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 17

    Filter Cake Formation in Vertical Wells Journal of Petroleum and Gas Engineering Vol. 2(7), pp. 146-164, November 2011 Mohd. A. Kabir and Isaac K. Gamwo

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 18

    Filtration Modeling Using DDPM/DEM

    Filter: Allows particles below a threshold to pass through, Filter represented by a internal boundary condition.

    Inlet Outlet

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 19

    Particle separation through a filter element at three instances in time. The flow is from left to right. The small particles flow through the holes in the perforated plate and exit the pipe on the right. The plate blocks the bigger particles.

    Filtration Modeling using MPM

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 20

    Particulate Migration in Gravel Pack

    Micro scale Simulation for fine particles transport through pores in gravel pack

    Study Permeability alterations in the gravel pack due to fine particles entrainments, transport and deposition

    Filtration of fine particles

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 21

    Sand Transport

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 22

    Example: Sand Transport in Pipelines

    Sand-Water slurry flow in horizontal pipe Pipe diameter D = 0.0505m Pipe length L = 4m

    30% volume loading Four Different Slurry Flow Rates DDPM with DEM Collision

    Particle staggering for surface injection

    Low value of Spring Constant as buoyancy force is important.

    Almost 3 millions parcels

    Gravity

    Slurry Velocity (m/s)

    dp/dx (Pa/m)

    SRC: Saskatchewan Research Council

    Expected Results

    To be published in collaboration with Shell

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 23

    Mean Static Pressure is plotted on the line coinciding with the axis of the pipe.

    dp/dx is calculated between z=3m to z=4m as it varies linearly in this range for all the cases.

    Results: Pressure Gradient

    Slurry Velocity (m/s)

    dp/dx (Pa/m)

    dp/dx pipe length dp/dx slurry velocity

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 24

    Reduced particle time step size to more accurately model collisions.

    Little difference in predicted pressure gradient.

    Considerable increase in simulation time.

    Effect of particle time step size Mixture Velocity (m/s) Baseline Particle Time

    Step Size (s) Smaller Particle Time Step Size (s)

    0.7 2.50E-04 1.0E-04

    1.42 1.00E-04 4.00E-05

    3 5.00E-05 2.50E-05

    Slurry Velocity (m/s)

    dp/dx (Pa/m)

    dp/dx slurry velocity

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 25

    It is important to keep particles suspended Critical flow velocity which keeps sand particles moving along

    the pipe depends on Liquid holdup and flow rates, Pipe diameter, Fluids properties, Sand

    properties, Pipe inclination angle

    Many correlations exists for solids transportation in multiphase flow

    Based on experiments for single phase flow on small pipes

    Lot of variability in measurements

    Sand Transport in Pipelines

    Hjulstrom Diagram

  • 2011 ANSYS, Inc. June 21, 2012 26

    Transport paths Traction or full contact

    sand rolling or sliding across bottom

    Saltation sand hop/ bounce along bottom

    Bedload combined traction and saltation

    Suspended load sand carried without settling

    upward forces > downwarde

    Sand Transport in Pipelines

    All these paths for sand transport can be addressed by Particulate modeling in ANSYS CFD.