ensuring public access to the coast in south pacific cities: the case of auckland, noumea and port...
TRANSCRIPT
Ensuring public access to the coast in South Pacific cities:
the case of Auckland, Noumea and Port Vila
Olivier HofferCentre des Nouvelles Etudes sur le Pacifique University of New Caledonia
PhD in geography and urban planning (2010-2013)
“When the shore is closing What governance of access and uses of the coastal interface in
three South Pacific agglomerations (Auckland, Noumea and Port Vila)?”
Access to the coast: a critical concept for urban sustainability
• In fast growing oceanian cities, urban coasts are under increasing pressures : residential development, resorts, port infrastructures…
• Closure of the foreshore in South Pacific cities: a paradoxical and unsustainable scenario
• «Ocean’s ubiquity»: site (isthmus, peninsulas, indented coastline), landscape/ambiance, uses/way of life
Anse Vata
Baie des Citrons
Baie de l’Orphelinat
Petite rade
Grande radeDucos peninsula
Baie de Koutio
Doniambo factory
Photograph: O.HOFFER, 2013
Access to the coast: a critical concept for urban sustainability
• Few geographical researches on this issue
• Spatial justice issue: « The right to the shore » part of « the right to the city » (Lefebvre, Harvey, Mitchell) ?
• Urban coast under increasing pressures in fast growing oceanian cities: residential development, resorts, port infrastructures…
• Closure of the foreshore in South Pacific cities: a paradoxical and unsustainable scenario
• «Ocean’s ubiquity»: site (isthmus, peninsula, indented coastline), landscape/ambiance, uses/way of life
Measuring public access to the coast
• Access to the coast is not access to the sea• Scarcity of relevant methods for measuring access: Clark
& Hilton (2003), Millward (1991, access to countryside)
• Evaluating the coast’s degree of publicity: field experience, specificities of oceanian cities (customary lands…), perceptions (feeling of access)
Does urban space close the coast ?
• Commonly accepted idea about privatization of urban space: « The end of public space » (Sennett, Harvey, Davis, Sorkin, Mitchell)
• According to this idea, urban coasts should be more closed than peri-urban coasts
• According to the results of fieldwork, it doesn’t apply in Auckland, Noumea nor Port Vila…
Does urban space close the coast ?
• Commonly accepted idea about privatization of urban space: « The end of public space » (Sennett, Harvey, Davis, Sorkin, Mitchell)
• According to this idea, urban coasts should be more closed than peri-urban coasts
• According to the results of fieldwork, it doesn’t apply to the coast in Auckland, Noumea nor Port Vila
• Link between urban density/centrality and publicity of the coast
• Urban governance is not incompatible with the preservation or creation of public spaces along the shore
A complex governance of access due to the diversity of actors’ strategies
• Preconceptions on actors’ strategies: public actors: regulation bodies, defence of public interest private actors: privatization, individual interest customary actors: taboo spaces, sanctuarisation, immobilism
• Customary actors: can manage public beaches (Okahu Bay), regulate the access (Mele Beach, Honey Moon Beach), be involved in gated communities subdivisions (Mele, Pango, Naniouni), or prevent access on claimed land (N’Dé)
• Public actors are not always regulating bodies: non- implementation of laws or planning, promote or run coastal property development (Kawenu Cove, Parc des 5 îles…)
• Private actors can as well ensure the opening that the closing of the coast: NIMBY/LULU movements