engr101/hum 200 technology and society october 4, 2005

24
ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

Upload: bruno-orum

Post on 31-Mar-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

ENGR101/HUM 200Technology and Society

October 4, 2005

Page 2: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

Agenda

• What is an engineer?

• What impact do engineers have on society?

• Technology and society or engineering and society?

• Politics of artifacts

Page 3: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

What is an Engineer?

Page 4: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

Who is an Engineer?

Page 5: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

An Engineer is…

• Someone who does research• Someone who develops a functional

prototype process, structure, or device• Someone who designs a working process,

structure, or device based on real world constraints

• Someone who establishes production and testing facilities for mass production

Page 6: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005
Page 7: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

Engineers also…

• Work as construction engineers (counterpart to production engineer)

• Work as facilities/operations engineers

• Find or create a market for a product (sales engineering)

• Work in management, consulting, teaching

Page 8: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005
Page 9: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

Impact of Engineering

From who does the engineering, and what kind of tasks they do, to what kind of influence do they have…

Page 10: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

“Do Artifacts Have Politics?”

• How is the “goodness” of a technology measured?– Contributions to efficiency and productivity

• And also…– Positive and negative environmental side

effects• Really just another measure of “cost”

– Manner in which they facilitate or re-establish certain power structures

Page 11: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

“It’s not the technology; it’s how it’s used”

• A “thing” can’t have politics

• Technology is neither inherently good nor bad

• People have politics, and people use the technology to achieve certain ends

• The social or economic system in which the technology exists is more important

Page 12: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

Corrective to Technological Determinism

• Technologies are shaped by social forces

• Technologies are shaped by economic forces

• But, do technological things matter in and of themselves??

Page 13: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

Artifacts Can Have Political Properties

First:Invention, design, or arrangement is a way of settling an issue in a community

Second:Inherently political technologies that are created to reinforce specific political relationship

Page 14: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

Inventions as Extension of Social Order

• Example: Overpasses on the Long Island parkways– Over 200 of them– As little as nine feet of clearance– Built to discourage the presence of buses on the

parkways– Buses are public transportation: class issues– Builder (Robert Moses) also blocked extension of the

LIR – Jones Beach access

Page 15: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

Bridges then…

Page 16: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

And now.

Page 17: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

The Hutchinson Parkway

Page 18: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

• Example: Broad boulevards of Paris.– Built by Napolean– Prevent street fighting

• Example: UT Austin student union public space• Example: Soviet architecture.

– Large plazas– Broad boulevards– Huge scale of blocks, government buildings

Page 19: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

Inherently Political Technologies

• Technologies that require specific social infrastructure to be effective (or even to work)

• Technologies that are “highly compatible with” certain social infrastructures

(Social infrastructure vs. physical infrastructure?)

Page 20: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

How Do We Measure “Good?” Or “Better?”

• Economic costs and benefits: – jobs created, income generated, etc.

• Environmental impacts– pollutants distributed, cancers created

• Risks to public health and safety– exposure to natural disaster impact, “unsafe at any

speed”

• “Consequences for the form and quality of human associations”

Page 21: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

Myth of Efficiency as Motivator

• Innovation has many “muses”– McCormick factory example. Inferior quality at

higher cost. Why did the factory owner take this path?

• Not all designing for social uses is intentional

Page 22: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

Massive Change

• “It’s not about the world of design, it’s about the design of the world”

Page 23: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

Choices are Made, or, We Make Choices

• Importance of introductory stages of a technology

• Every decision is based on assumptions -- often unexamined assumptions

• Centralized vs. decentralized technologies

Page 24: ENGR101/HUM 200 Technology and Society October 4, 2005

Next class

• Read “The Machine Stops”

• Read The Diamond Age

• Introduction of Design Assignment