energy evolution for the sivers asymmetries in hard processes

27
Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes Peng Sun LBNL in collaboration with F Yuan arXiv: 1304.5037

Upload: qabil

Post on 20-Jan-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes. Peng Sun LBNL in collaboration with F Yuan arXiv: 1304.5037. Outlines. TMD factorization Energy evolution Fit the sivers function with SIDIS experiments Implement the TMD evolution from low Q SIDIS to Drell-Yan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Energy Evolution for the SiversAsymmetries in Hard Processes

Peng Sun

LBNL in collaboration with F YuanarXiv: 1304.5037

Page 2: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Outlines TMD factorization Energy evolution Fit the sivers function with SIDIS

experiments Implement the TMD evolution from low Q

SIDIS to Drell-Yan Collins asymmetries

23/4/21 2

Page 3: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

TMD factorization TMD factorization is an extension and

simplification to the collinear factorization

Simplifies the kinematicsPower counting, correction 1/Q neglected

(PT,Q)=H(Q) f1(x1,k1T,Q) f2(x2,k2T, Q) S(T)There is no x- and kT-dependence in the hard

factor

23/4/21 3

Page 4: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Energy evolution

At the leading order of ɑs

By solving CSS evolution equations

Page 5: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes
Page 6: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

There is no Landau pole singularity in the integral

Almost parameter-freeNo Q-dependent non-perturbative form factorGaussian assumption at lower scale Q0

23/4/21 6

Page 7: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

SIDIS

SIDIS at HERMES

g0=0.1, gh=0.045

Q2=3.14GeV2, x=0.16

23/4/21 7

Q2=3.14GeV2

X=0.16

Page 8: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

SIDIS at COMPASS, Q2=7.75, x=0.1

Page 9: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Drell-Yan

23/4/21 9

Page 10: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Fit to Sivers asymmetries

With the evolution effects taken into account. Not so large Q difference

23/4/21 10

Page 11: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes
Page 12: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes
Page 13: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes
Page 14: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Uncertainties in the Sivers functions: moments

23/4/21 14

Up quark most constrained in the moderate xLarge uncertainties in small-x region and sea quark

Page 15: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Predictions at RHIC

About a factor of 2 reduction, as compared to previous order of magnitude difference

23/4/21 15

Page 16: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Collins asymmetries in e+e- →hh

The collins effect is porprotianal to cos(2ɸ0)

Page 17: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Collins asymmetries

Ec.m.≈10GeV, di-hadron azimuthal asymmetric correlation in e+e- annihilation

23/4/21 17

Page 18: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Test the evolution at BEPC

Ec.m.=4.6GeV, di-hadron in e+e- annihilation BEPC-(Beijing electron-positron collider)

23/4/21 18

Page 19: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Conclusion We evaluate the energy dependence for

Sivers asymmetries in hard processes, from HERMES/COMPASS to typical Drell-Yan process

The same evolution procedure consistently describes the Collins asymmetries from HERMES/COMPASS and BELLE

Further tests are needed to nail down this issue

23/4/21 19

Page 20: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Thank you very much!

Page 21: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Ji Ma Yuan scheme, in SIDIS

Structure function is

It depends on ρ

Page 22: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Collins scheme

This version is much simpler than that of Ji Ma Yuan

Page 23: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

In Aybat-Collins-Qiu-Rogers framework

And then

Here gK(b) is gc×b2

Page 24: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Energy Evolution in TMD factorization scheme

Aybat-Collins-Qiu-Rogers, 2011

Page 25: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Q2-dependence Aybat-Prokudin-Rogers, 2011

23/4/21 25Needs a cross check!

Page 26: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Collins asymmetries in SIDIS

asd

23/4/21 26

Page 27: Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes

Energy evolution

In our framework

At the leading order of ɑs