elementary class size review. summary of research on class size reduction of primary classes the...
TRANSCRIPT
Elementary Class Size Review
Summary of Research on Class Size Reduction of Primary Classes
• The studies in support of class size reduction indicate:
– Leads to increased academic achievement – Academic gains are sustained through elementary school– Results in fewer retentions– Support additional teacher-student time– Result in fewer behavior disruptions– Support increased student participation– Optimal class size is 15-17
Summary of Research on Class Size Reduction of Primary Classes
• The studies that refute the impact of class size reduction indicate:
– Cited flawed research in major CSR studies – No significant increase in reading scores– Greatest gains of most studies were with low income minority
students– Gains students made were not sustained over the years– Single most important determinant in student achievement is the
quality of the teacher
The Council Rock Journey to Class Size Reduction
• Class Size Committee Report of 1999– Recommended phasing in a reduction of class sizes from numbers of:
Kindergarten 28 to 25First 28 to 25Second 30 to 25Third 30 to 26Fourth 32 to 28Fifth 32 to 28Sixth 32 to 28
Other Recommendations include
• Changes to how additional sections are assigned
• Staff Classes until July 1• (Practice at that time staffed sections until the first day of school)
• Enroll students in the class that had the lowest number of students at time of registration and provide transportation
• Later amendment to recommendations included adding an assistant to oversized classrooms
Moving the CSR Initiative Forward
• May 2000 – Board approved implementing class size reductions in grades K-2 beginning in school year 2000-2001
• July 2000 Board approved phasing in of additional grade levels over future years as long as the budget allowed for such
• June 2003, Grade 3 class size was implemented• Grade 4 followed thereafter
Class Size and Student Achievement
• A Look at Class Sizes in CR and other Districts
• A Look at SAT averages in CR and other Districts
• A Look at PSSA proficiency in CR and other Districts
Class Size MaximumIn CR and other Districts
Grade Council Rock Central Bucks North Penn Lower
Merion Pennridge Pennsbury
Kindergarten 25 15-24 22-25 21 25 22
First 25 18-28 23-26 23 27 24
Second 25 18-28 23-26 23 28 24
Third 26 18-28 23-26 24 28 24
Fourth 28 20-30 25-29 26 30 24
Fifth 30 20-30 25-29 26 30 26
Sixth 30 20-30 25-29 * * *
SAT Scores 2012-2014 2014 2013 2012
School Name Verbal Math Writing Verbal Math Writing Verbal Math Writing
CENTRAL BUCKS HS EAST 559 582 575 557 576 567 543 567 549
CENTRAL BUCKS HS SOUTH N/A N/A N/A 525 553 537 522 548 534
CENTRAL BUCKS HS WEST 546 554 536 534 559 534 548 567 548
COUNCIL ROCK HS NORTH 560 579 565 557 577 558 552 573 559
COUNCIL ROCK HS SOUTH 524 557 523 538 565 534 521 556 523
SAT Scores 2012-2014 2014 2013 2012
School Name Verbal Math Writing Verbal Math Writing Verbal Math Writing
HARRITON HS 565 599 560 581 593 576 581 603 585
LOWER MERION HS 606 621 606 566 574 550 582 589 568
NORTH PENN HS 529 551 519 529 551 518 529 552 527
PENNRIDGE HS 518 529 497 514 536 503 508 529 499
PENNSBURY HS 526 537 519 522 536 513 517 534 505
PSSA Data 2011-2012Grades 3-5
Council Rock Pennsbury Central Bucks Pennridge Lower Merion North Penn
2012 PSSA - 3-5
Math 83.5 82.5 89.3 83.7 90 83.5
Reading 88.8 88.4 92 89.1 94 89.5
2011 PSSA - 3-5
Reading 81.9 82.9 88.4 83.7 91.4 85.4
Math 88.6 88.4 92.7 90 94.4 90.5
PSSA Data 2011-2012Grades 6-8
Council Rock Pennsbury Central Bucks Pennridge Lower Merion North Penn
2012 PSSA - 6-8
Reading 89.2 87.1 92.4 86.3 92.4 86.6
Math 88.7 81.7 92.2 87.3 91.4 88.4
2011 PSSA - 6-8
Reading 90.4 84.9 92.2 87.3 91.5 86.7
Math 88.2 79.1 91.9 88 93.3 88.9
PSSA Data 2011-2012Grade 11
Council Rock Pennsbury Central Bucks Pennridge Lower
Merion North Penn
2012 PSSA - 11
Reading 82.4 79.3 87.3 82.7 85.8 83.1
Math 77.4 66.7 82.1 77.7 85 82.2
2011 PSSA - 11
Reading 86.4 80 89.4 82.1 87.8 79.5
Math 78.9 68.8 83.3 76.9 83.1 78.5
Average 2012-2014 SAT Scores Correlated to Sixth Grade Class Size Maximums
PENNRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL - 30
COUNCIL ROCK HS NORTH - 30
COUNCIL ROCK HS SOUTH - 30
NORTH PENN HIGH SCHOOL - 29
PENNSBURY HIGH SCHOOL - 29
LOWER MERION HIGH SCHOOL - 26
440
460
480
500
520
540
560
580
600
620
Verbal Average Math Average Writing Average
Average 2011-2012 PSSA Scores (Grade 3-5) Correlated to Third Grade Class Size Maximum
Pennridge - 28 Central Bucks - 28 Council Rock - 26 North Penn - 26 Pennsbury - 24 Lower Merion - 2480
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
Math Average Reading Average
Proficiency Percentage
Average 2011-2012 PSSA Scores (Grade 3-5) Correlated to Fourth Grade Class Size Maximum
Pennridge - 30 Central Bucks - 30 North Penn - 29 Council Rock - 28 Pennsbury - 26 Lower Merion - 2680
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
Math Average Reading Average
Proficiency Percentage
Comparison Between 2001 and 2012 PSSA Scores in Council Rock
2001 200870
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
Reading - Grade Five Math - Grade Five
Proficiency Percentage
Addressing Enrollment Spikes 2012-2013 4 Reserve - .5 added
SFE – KindergartenSFE – ThirdNES – FirstNES – ThirdGES - First
Sister School 11
2013 – 20144 Reserve - 1 added
HOL – Kindergarten .5HCE – Kindergarten .5CES – ThirdRHE – FirstMMW – FirstNES – FifthSister School 15
2014-20153 added; Asst. added
HCE – FirstNES – FirstSFE – SecondWES – Assistant
Sister School 4
Average Class Size by School and Grade2014-2015
K Max 25
1Max 25
2Max 25
3Max 26
4Max 28
5Max 30
6Max 30
CES 21 (3) 22 (4) 23 (4) 25 (4) 28 (3) 30 (4) 29 (4)
GES 21(4) 25(4) 24(5) 21(5) 24(5) 25(4) 26(4)
HCE 24(2) 20(4) 24(3) 23(3) 27(3) 27(3) 25(3)
HOL 16(2) 23(2) 19(2) 20(2) 25(2) 28(2) 22(3)
MMW 20(3) 21(4) 21(4) 25(4) 26(4) 28(3) 25(4)
NES 23(3) 21(5) 23(5) 21(4) 26(4) 29(4) 24(4)
RES 19(2) 21(2) 17(3) 25(3) 23(3) 24(3) 23(3)
ROL 23 (2) 23 (3) 18 (3) 21 (3) 20 (3) 20 (3) 32 (2)
SFE 20 (3) 22 (4) 22 (5) 23 (4) 26 (4) 27 (4) 30 (4)
WES 14 (2) 24 (2) 27 (2) 22 (2) 24 (2) 29 (2) 23 (2)
Dist. Avg. 20.2 22.0 21.6 22.4 24.8 26.6 25.7
Number in parenthesis equals number of sections per grade
And the Data Shows…
• Council Rock is comparable to most school districts in class size maximums
• Student achievement is comparable with other districts with similar class sizes as Council Rock
• In a given year some sections will have fewer students than other sections
• Spikes in enrollment by school/grade impact class sizes• Council Rock’s process for assigning additional sections is similar
to that of most districts
What the Data Doesn’t Show
• Fewer behavior notices• Fewer school suspensions• More optimal use of physical space• More opportunity for small group instruction • More opportunity for one:one instruction – meeting individual
student needs
Next Steps
• Determine and update practice for assigning sections
• Establish clear cut off date for summer registrations
• Update School Board Policy 126
References• Chingos, Matthew M. "The False Promise of Class-Size Reduction." Center for American
Progress, 2011: 1-13. Print.• Grantham, Madeline K. “Impact of Small Class Size on Achievement” Mississippi State
University, 2000. Print• Hood, Art. “A Parent’s Guide to Class Size Reduction.” Southeastern Regional Vision for
Education (SERVE), 2003. Print• Johnson, Kirk A. “Do Small Classes Influence Academic Achievement?: What the National
Assessment of Educational Progress Shows.” Washington, D.C.: Heritage Foundation, 2000. Print
• Pate-Bain, Helen, C. M. Achilles, Jayne Boyd-Zaharias, and Bernard McKenna. "Class Size Does Make a Difference." Phi Delta Kappan 1992: 253-55. Print.
• Schanzenback, Diane Whitmore. “Review of Class Size: What Research Says and What it Means for State Policy.” National Education Policy Center, 2011