efficient market hypothesis slides
DESCRIPTION
EMH slidesTRANSCRIPT
11-1
THE EFFICIENT MARKET
HYPOTHESIS
CHAPTER 11
11-2
Outline of the Chapter
• What is the Efficient Market Hypothesis?
• Versions of the EMH
• Methods employed to identify underpriced
securities
• Event studies
• Empirical Tests of EMH
– Weak-form
– Semistrong-form
• Mutual fund and analyst performance
11-3
Random Walks and the Efficient Market
Hypothesis
• Efficient Market
Hypothesis (EMH):
stock prices already
reflect all the
available information
– Stock prices should
follow a random walk
– Price changes
should be random
and unpredictable
11-4
Random Walks and the Efficient Market
Hypothesis (Continued)
• Stock prices fully and accurately reflect publicly available information.
• Once information becomes available, market participants analyze it.
• Competition assures prices reflect information.
• Degree of efficiency differs across various markets.
– Emerging markets, and small stocks are less intensively analysed so the stocks in emerging markets and the small stocks may be less efficiently priced.
11-5
• There are three forms of efficiency which
differ by their notions of what is meant by the
term “ all available information”.
– Weak-form efficiency indicates that stock
prices already reflect all information that can
be derived by examining market trading data
such as the history of past prices and trading
volume.
• In a weak-form efficient markets if historical
data such as past prices conveys an
information related to the future it has to be
known by the all investors and caused an
immediate change in the stock prices.
Random Walks and the Efficient Market
Hypothesis (Continued)
11-6
Random Walks and the Efficient Market
Hypothesis (Continued)
– Semistrong-form efficiency indicates that all publicly available information regarding the prospects of a firm must be already reflected in the stock price.
• Information includes past prices, fundamental data on the firm’s product line, quality of management, balance sheet composition, patents held, earning forecasts, and accounting practices.
– Strong-form efficiency states that stock prices reflect all information relevant to the firm, even including information available only to company insiders.
11-7
Random Walks and the Efficient Market
Hypothesis (Continued)
• If an investor earns abnormal returns by using historical data then the market is _______
• If an investor earns abnormal returns by using publicly available information then the market is_________.
• If an investor earns abnormal returns by using private information (inside information) then the market is ____________.
11-8
Implications of the EMH
• Technical Analysis:
– Search for repeating and predictable patterns in
stock prices.
– Technical analysts study records or charts of past
stock prices to find patterns they can exploit to
make profit.
– Key assumption is that stock prices respond
slowly to the changes in the supply and demand
factors.
• Prices of stocks do not change that quickly
– Using stock prices and volume information to
predict future prices
– Technical analysis should not work even in a
_________
11-9
Implications of the EMH (Continued)
• Technical Analysis (Continued)
– Trends and Corrections
• Trying to find the trends in stock prices.
• Searching for the momentum, tendency for rising
asset prices to raise further.
• Methods employed:
– Dow Theory, Moving Averages, Breadth
– Sentiment Indicators
• Methods employed:
– Trin Statistic, Confidence Index, Put/Call Ratio
11-10
Implications of the EMH (Continued)
• Dow Theory
– Three factors affect the stock prices according to this
theory.
• Primary trend: long-term movement of prices
• Secondary (intermediate) trends: short-term deviations of
prices from the underlying trend
• Tertiary (minor) trends: daily fluctuations
11-11
Implications of the EMH (Continued)• Dow Theory (Continued)
– Efficient Market Hypothesis says that if there is a pattern
investors would try to use this and make profit
• Moving Averages
– Average level of the index (stock price) over a given interval
of time (e.g. 52 weeks)
11-12
Implications of the EMH (Continued)
• Moving Averages (Continued)
– When moving average line cuts the stock prices line from
below it is time to _________.
– When moving average line cuts the stock prices line from
above it is time to ___________.
• Breadth
– A measure of the extens to which movement in a market
index is reflected in the price movements of all the stocks in
the market.
– Spread=number of stocks those prices increased-number
of stocks those prices decreased
• If advances are larger than declines then the market is
stronger
11-13
Implications of the EMH (Continued)
• Trin Statistic
– The more investors participate in market advance or retreat
(transactions) the more the significance of the movement.
– The increase in the market index is a better signal for
continuing price increases if complimanted by increase in
a trading volume.
– The decrease in the market index is considered more
bearish when associated with higher volume.
– Trin statistic=[volume declining/number declining]/[volume
advancing/number advancing]
– If trin statistis>1 then the market is considered ________
• Shows _______ pressure
11-14
Implications of the EMH (Continued)
• Confidence Index
– Assumption: actions of the bond traders will be followed by
the stock market traders.
– The average yield on 10 top-rated corporate bonds/the
average yield on 10 intermediate-grade corporate bonds
– When bond traders are optimistic they require smaller
default premiums on the lower graded bonds thus the yield
spread narrows. The confidence index approaches to
________.
– Higher values of confidence index is a sign for _______.
11-15
Implications of the EMH (Continued)
• Put/Call Ratio
– Outstanding put options/outstanding call options
– Call option: give investor the right to buy a stock at a fixed
price.
• Exercised when prices increase
– Put option: give investor right to sell a stock at a fixed
price.
• Exercised when prices decrease
– If the put/call ratio increases above a historical
average then it is accepted as a signal for ________.
11-16
Implications of the EMH (Continued)
• Fundamental Analysis
– Uses earnings and dividend prospects of the
firm, expectations of future interest rates, and risk
evaluation of the firm to determine proper stock
prices.
– The fundamental analyst tries to determine the
present discounted value of all the payments a
stockholder will receive from each share of stock.
– Then the analyst compare the fair price he
computed with the market price and if the market
price is lower then he recommend to _____ the
shares since they are __________.
11-17
Implications of the EMH (Continued)
– However if the market is semistrong-form efficient
then the stock prices should already reflect all the
information employed by the analyst to value the
stock.
– Thus the analyst has to find the firms that are
better than everyone else’s estimate in order
fundamental analysis to work.
– The analysts can make money only if his analysis
is better than that of his competitors since the
market price already reflect all commonly available
information.
11-18
Implications of the EMH (Continued)
• The Efficient Market Hypothesis implies passive
investment strategy.
– Passive investment strategy makes no attempt to
outsmart the market.
– It aims to find a well-diversified portfolio and buy-
and-hold this portfolio.
– The stock prices are at fair levels with given
information, they reflect all the information
available.
– So, there is no need to try to find over-
underpriced stocks, no need to buy and sell
securities frequently and generate large
brokerage fees.
11-19
Implications of the EMH (Continued)
• Even if the market is efficient a role exists for
portfolio management:
– Role of diversification: Portfolio managers can
select securities that diversifies the unsystematic
risk of the portfolio and provide the systematic risk
level that the investor asks for.
– Tax considerations: High-tax bracket investors
generally will not want the same securities that
low-bracket investors find favorable.
– Other considerations:
• Different risk profiles of investors.
11-20
Event Studies
• What is an event study?
– It is a technique of empirical financial research that
enables an observer to assess the impact of a
particular event on a firm’s stock price.
• Relation with the EMH
– If security prices reflect all currently available
information, then price changes must reflect new
information.
– We can measure the importance of an event of interest
by examining price changes during the period in which
the event occurs.
– The event can be dividend change, mergers,
acquisitions, change in regulations...
11-21
Event Studies (Continued)
• How event study methodology works?
– The abnormal return due to event is estimated.
– The abnormal return is the difference between the
stock’s actual return and the benchmark.
– The benchmark rate is what the stock’s return would
have been in the absence of the event.
• Benchmark rate can be broad market index as in single-
index model, or rate of return computed according to
CAPM or any other multifactor model such as Fama-
French three factor model.
11-22
Event Studies (Continued)
– rt=a+brMt+et
• rMt: the market’s rate of return
• et: part of a security’s return resulting from firm-specific
events
• b: measures sensitivity to the market return
• a: the average rate of return the stock would realize in a
period with a zero market return.
– The abnormal return (firm-specific) is the unexpected
return that results from the event.
• We need to estimate et to determine abnormal return.
– et=rt-(a+brMt)
• et: measures the stock’s return over and above what one
would predict based on broad market movements in that
period, given the stock’s sensitivity to the market due to
the event.
11-23
Event Studies (Continued)
– Example:
• An analysts estimated that a=0.05%, and
b=0.8.
• If the market increases by 1% then what
will be the expected return of the stock?
• If the stock actually increases for 2% what
will be the abnormal return of the stock due
to the firm-specific news?
11-24
Event Studies (Continued)
• Problems related to the event studies:
– It is really difficult to isolate the effects of single event
on the stock prices.
• The stock prices are usually affected from macro and
microeconomic changes on a day.
– Leakage of information: Information regarding a
relevant event is released to a small group of
investors before official public release.
• In this case the stock prices may start to react the
event before the official announcement date.
• So, the abnormal return on the official announcement
date may not be a good indicator to analyse the effects
of the event on the stock prices.
11-25
Event Studies (Continued)
• In order to overcome leakage problem cumulative
abnormal returns are employed as proxies to examine
the effects of events on the stock prices.
• Cumulative abnormal return is the sum of all abnormal
returns over the time period of interest.
• Cumulative abnormal returns captures the total firm-
specific stock movement for an entire period when the
market is repsonding to the news.
11-26
Event Studies (Continued)
• Figure 11.1 shows an example
for an effect of good event on the
stock returns.• The huge jump of the CAR on
the event date (day 0).
• After the announcement date
CAR no longer increases or
decreases.
• The CAR starts to increase 30
days in advance of the
announcement date.
• Leakage
• Buying large blocks of stock
11-27
• Magnitude Issue
– Stock prices might be very close to fair values
so only managers of large portfolios can earn
enough trading profits to worth the effort.
• Selection Bias Issue
– The outcomes we are able to observe have
been preselected in favor of failed attempts.
– If an investor finds a way to beat the market,
make money then usually (s)he will not
publish it.
Are Markets Efficient?
11-28
Are Markets Efficient?(Continued)
• Lucy Event Issue
– From time to time there might be some
successful portfolio managers.
– The important point is whether the successful
portfolio manager can repeat his/her
performance in another period.
11-29
Are Markets Efficient? (Continued)
• Empirical tests for three different forms of the
EMH:
– Weak-Form Tests
• Could speculators find trends in past prices that
would enable them to earn abnormal profits?
• Do technical analysis really work?
• Methods employed:
– Measuring the serial correlation of stock market
returns.
» Serial correlation: tendency for stock returns to
be related to past returns.
» Positive serial correlation: positive returns tend
to follow positive returns (momentum type
property)
11-30
Are Markets Efficient? (Continued)
» Negative serial correlation: positive returns tend to be followed by negative returns or vice versa.
• Empirical findings
– Positive serial correlation (momentum) in stock market prices is detected in short-to-intermediate horizon.
– Negative serial correlation in market prices is detected in long-horizon (multiyear periods).
– Stock markets may overreact to some news and present positive serial correlation among prices in the short horizon. However the stock markets correct this overreaction in the long time horizon so presents negative serial correlation.
– Stock market prices fluctuate around their fair values.
11-31
Are Markets Efficient? (Continued)
–Variables to predict market returns:
»The dividend/price ratio (Fama and
French, 1988)
»The earnings yield (Campell and Shiller,
1988)
»The spread between yields on high-and
low-grade corporate bonds (Keim and
Stambaugh, 1986)
–Does this show market inefficiency?
11-32
Are Markets Efficient? (Continued)
– Semistrong-form Tests
• In general, these are the tests employed to
examine whether the fundamental analysis
help to improve investment performance.
• Efficient market anomalies
• Problems:
–Joint tests of efficient market hypothesis
and the risk adjustment procedure.
11-33
Are Markets Efficient? (Continued)
• Examples of anomalies:
– Price/earnings effect
» Basu (1977, 1983) shows that low price to
earnings ratio portfolios have provided higher
returns than high P/E portfolios.
» The returns are adjusted for the portfolio beta
– Small-firm effect (size effect)
» Banz (1981) presents that small –firm portfolios
have higher returns even when returns are
adjusted for risk using CAPM.
» Keim (1983), Reinganum (1983), Blume and
Stambaugh (1983) find that small-firm effect
holds in January (first 2 weeks of January).
11-34
Are Markets Efficient? (Continued)
» Neglected-firm effect : Arbel and Strebel (1983)
show that because small-firms are neglected by
big institutional traders information about them
are less available. This information deficiency
makes these small firms riskier thus they should
ask for more return.
» Liquidity effect: Amihud and Mendelson (1986,
1991) present that small and neglected firms
are less liquid and have higher trading costs, so
these firms’ stocks have tendency to exhibit
high risk-adjusted rates of return, which in
reality is higher risk premium for being illiquid.
11-35
Are Markets Efficient? (Continued)
– Book-to-market ratio
» Fama and French (1992) also find an anomaly
and show that higher book-to market portfolios
(portfolios composed of high book value of
equity to market value of equity ratio) have
higher average monthly rate of returns.
– Post-earnings-announcement price drift
» Ball and Brown (1986) show that contrary to
EMH, stock prices do not react to the
announcements as quick as they should.
» Rendlemen, Jones and Latane (1982) find that
if the firms announce good (bad) news then
there is a positive (negative) abnormal return in
the announcement day.
11-36
Are Markets Efficient? (Continued)
» However, the cumulative abnormal returns of
positive surprise rise even after the
announcement date (momentum) and the
negative-surprise firms continue to suffer
negative abnormal returns.
– Strong-form Tests
• We do not expect markets to be strong-form
efficient.
• If insiders trade then they can have abnormal
profits because of their superior information.
• Jaffe (1974) shows that the stock prices tend to
increase (decrease) after insiders intensively
bought (sold) shares.
11-37
Are Markets Efficient? (Continued)
– How are these anomalies interpreted in the
finance literature?
• Fama and French (1993) argue that size and book-
to-market ratios are risk factors as CAPM beta.
Thus it is not against the efficieny hypothesis that
these factors are significant when explaining the
abnormal returns in the market
• On the other hand, Lakonishok, Shleifer, and
Vishney (1995) argue that security analysts
overprice firms with recent good performance and
underprice firms with recent poor performance.
11-38
Are Markets Efficient? (Continued)
• Noisy market hypothesis:
– The market prices may contain pricing errors
(“noises”) relative to their intrinsic (“true”) values.
– On average the prices may be correct but at any
time some stocks may be overpriced and inflate
market returns relative to the true values.
– Since indexed portfolios invest in securities in
proportion to their market capitalization (stock price
times number of shares), there portfolios invest
more in overpriced securities.
– Thus, this capitalization-weighted investment
strategy is overweight the firms with the worst
return prospects.
11-39
Are Markets Efficient? (Continued)
– The advocates of noisy market hypothesis suggest
to employ fundamental index portfolios to invest.
– Fundamental index portfolios are formed by
investing in securities in proportion to their intrinsic
values.
» Problem: true intrinsic values
11-40
Mutual Fund and Analyst Performance
• Can the skilled investors make consistent abnormal
profits?
– Looking at the performance of market professionals
(stock market analysts and mutual fund managers)
– Can they generate performance superior to that of a
passive index fund?
– The research related to mutual fund managers
indicate that the performance of the professional
managers is consistent with the market efficiency.
– There are not that many performances that is superior
to the passive strategies.
• Studies of mutual fund performance can be
affected by survivorship bias.
11-41
Mutual Fund and Analyst Performance
(Continued)
• Survivorship Bias
– The tendency for the less successful funds to go out
of business over time and leave the sample.
– It looks like there is persistency in the performance
even if there is none in reality.
– Only the successful funds stayed in the sample so
they look persistently outperforming the market since
the rest, unsuccessful ones, have already left the
stage