effects of adenosine and a selective a2a adenosine ...noson (cvt-3146, cv therapeutics, inc., a...

11
Effects of Adenosine and a Selective A 2A Adenosine Receptor Agonist on Hemodynamic and Thallium-201 and Technetium-99m–SestaMIBI Biodistribution and Kinetics Choukri Mekkaoui, PHD,* Farid Jadbabaie, MD,* Donald P. Dione, BS,* David F. Meoli, MD, PHD,* Kailasnath Purushothaman, PHD,† Luiz Belardinelli, MD,‡ Albert J. Sinusas, MD*† New Haven, Connecticut; and Palo Alto, California OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare a selective A 2A adenosine receptor agonist (regadenoson) with adenosine in clinically relevant canine models with regard to effects on hemodynamics and thallium-201 ( 201 Tl) and technetium-99m ( 99m Tc)-sestaMIBI biodistribution and kinetics. BACKGROUND The clinical application of vasodilator stress for perfusion imaging requires consideration of the effects of these vasodilating agents on systemic hemodynamics, coronary flow, and radiotracer uptake and clearance kinetics. METHODS Sequential imaging and arterial blood sampling was performed on control, anesthetized closed-chest canines (n 7) to evaluate radiotracer biodistribution and kinetics after either a bolus administration of regadenoson (2.5 g/kg) or 4.5-min infusion of adenosine (280 g/kg). The effects of regadenoson on coronary flow and myocardial radiotracer uptake were then evaluated in an open-chest canine model of a critical stenosis (n 7). Results from ex vivo single-photon emission computed tomography were compared with tissue well-counting. RESULTS The use of regadenoson compared favorably with adenosine in regard to the duration and magnitude of the hemodynamic effects and the effect on 201 Tl and 99m Tc-sestaMIBI biodistribution and kinetics. The arterial blood clearance half-time was significantly faster for 99m Tc-sestaMIBI (regadenoson: 1.4 0.03 min; adenosine: 1.5 0.08 min) than for 201 Tl (regadenoson: 2.5 0.16 min, p 0.01; adenosine: 2.7 0.04 min, p 0.01) for both vasodilator stressors. The relative microsphere flow deficit (0.34 0.02%) during regadenoson stress was significantly greater than the relative perfusion defect with 99m Tc-sestaMIBI (0.69 0.03%, p 0.001) or 201 Tl (0.53 0.02%, p 0.001), although 201 Tl tracked the flow deficit within the ischemic region better than 99m Tc-sestaMIBI. The perfusion defect score was larger with 201 Tl (22 2.8% left ventricular) than with 99m Tc-sestaMIBI (17 1.7% left ventricular, p 0.05) on ex vivo single-photon emission computed tomography images. CONCLUSIONS The bolus administration of regadenoson produced a hyperemic response compa- rable to a standard infusion of adenosine. The biodistribution and clearance of both 201 Tl and 99m Tc-sestaMIBI during regadenoson were similar to adenosine vasodilation. Ex vivo perfusion images under the most ideal conditions permitted detection of a critical stenosis, although 201 Tl offered significant advantages over 99m Tc-sestaMIBI for perfusion imaging during regadenoson vasodilator stress. (J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009; 2:1198 –208) © 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation From the *Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, and †Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and ‡CV Therapeutics, Inc., Palo Alto, California. This research was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the Heritage Affiliate of American Heart Association (to Dr. Purushothaman), Robbinsville, New Jersey, and a grant from CV Therapeutics, Inc. (to Dr. Sinusas). Manuscript received September 2, 2008; revised manuscript received June 4, 2009, accepted June 10, 2009. JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING VOL. 2, NO. 10, 2009 © 2009 BY THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION ISSN 1936-878X/09/$36.00 PUBLISHED BY ELSEVIER INC. DOI:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.06.013

Upload: others

Post on 06-Nov-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Effects of Adenosine and a Selective A2A Adenosine ...noson (CVT-3146, CV Therapeutics, Inc., a sub-sidiary of Gilead, Foster City, California), an A 2A agonist, is a potent vasodilator

J A C C : C A R D I O V A S C U L A R I M A G I N G V O L . 2 , N O . 1 0 , 2 0 0 9

© 2 0 0 9 B Y T H E A M E R I C A N C O L L E G E O F C A R D I O L O G Y F O U N D A T I O N I S S N 1 9 3 6 - 8 7 8 X / 0 9 / $ 3 6 . 0 0

P U B L I S H E D B Y E L S E V I E R I N C . D O I : 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . j c m g . 2 0 0 9 . 0 6 . 0 1 3

Effects of Adenosine and a Selective A2AAdenosine Receptor Agonist on Hemodynamicand Thallium-201 and Technetium-99m–SestaMIBIBiodistribution and KineticsChoukri Mekkaoui, PHD,* Farid Jadbabaie, MD,* Donald P. Dione, BS,*David F. Meoli, MD, PHD,* Kailasnath Purushothaman, PHD,† Luiz Belardinelli, MD,‡Albert J. Sinusas, MD*†

New Haven, Connecticut; and Palo Alto, California

O B J E C T I V E S The purpose of this study was to compare a selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist

(regadenoson) with adenosine in clinically relevant canine models with regard to effects on hemodynamics

and thallium-201 (201Tl) and technetium-99m (99mTc)-sestaMIBI biodistribution and kinetics.

B A C K G R O U N D The clinical application of vasodilator stress for perfusion imaging requires

consideration of the effects of these vasodilating agents on systemic hemodynamics, coronary flow, and

radiotracer uptake and clearance kinetics.

M E T H O D S Sequential imaging and arterial blood sampling was performed on control, anesthetized

closed-chest canines (n � 7) to evaluate radiotracer biodistribution and kinetics after either a bolus

administration of regadenoson (2.5 �g/kg) or 4.5-min infusion of adenosine (280 �g/kg). The effects of

regadenoson on coronary flow and myocardial radiotracer uptake were then evaluated in an open-chest

canine model of a critical stenosis (n � 7). Results from ex vivo single-photon emission computed

tomography were compared with tissue well-counting.

R E S U L T S The use of regadenoson compared favorably with adenosine in regard to the duration and

magnitude of the hemodynamic effects and the effect on 201Tl and 99mTc-sestaMIBI biodistribution and

kinetics. The arterial blood clearance half-time was significantly faster for 99mTc-sestaMIBI (regadenoson:

1.4 � 0.03 min; adenosine: 1.5 � 0.08 min) than for 201Tl (regadenoson: 2.5 � 0.16 min, p � 0.01;

adenosine: 2.7 � 0.04 min, p � 0.01) for both vasodilator stressors. The relative microsphere flow deficit

(0.34 � 0.02%) during regadenoson stress was significantly greater than the relative perfusion defect

with 99mTc-sestaMIBI (0.69 � 0.03%, p � 0.001) or 201Tl (0.53 � 0.02%, p � 0.001), although 201Tl tracked

the flow deficit within the ischemic region better than 99mTc-sestaMIBI. The perfusion defect score was

larger with 201Tl (22 � 2.8% left ventricular) than with 99mTc-sestaMIBI (17 � 1.7% left ventricular, p �

0.05) on ex vivo single-photon emission computed tomography images.

C O N C L U S I O N S The bolus administration of regadenoson produced a hyperemic response compa-

rable to a standard infusion of adenosine. The biodistribution and clearance of both 201Tl and 99mTc-sestaMIBI

during regadenoson were similar to adenosine vasodilation. Ex vivo perfusion images under the most ideal

conditions permitted detection of a critical stenosis, although 201Tl offered significant advantages over99mTc-sestaMIBI for perfusion imaging during regadenoson vasodilator stress. (J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;

2:1198–208) © 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

From the *Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, and †Department of Diagnostic Radiology,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and ‡CV Therapeutics, Inc., Palo Alto, California. Thisresearch was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the Heritage Affiliate of American Heart Association (to Dr.Purushothaman), Robbinsville, New Jersey, and a grant from CV Therapeutics, Inc. (to Dr. Sinusas).

Manuscript received September 2, 2008; revised manuscript received June 4, 2009, accepted June 10, 2009.

Page 2: Effects of Adenosine and a Selective A2A Adenosine ...noson (CVT-3146, CV Therapeutics, Inc., a sub-sidiary of Gilead, Foster City, California), an A 2A agonist, is a potent vasodilator

Msidid2

d

tlPuvasdpapss

vaaaaensao(l

saodba

eaMf

t9

aTrm

M

S�tvnt(aagl

C

taaamtctm

A

rdpwpprt(purotnsaP9

oa

thallium-201

J A C C : C A R D I O V A S C U L A R I M A G I N G , V O L . 2 , N O . 1 0 , 2 0 0 9

O C T O B E R 2 0 0 9 : 1 1 9 8 – 2 0 8

Mekkaoui et al.

Adenosine and Regadenoson Vasodilators

1199

yocardial stress-rest perfusion imagingis used to detect coronary artery dis-ease. Thallium-201 (201Tl)-labeled andtechnetium-99m (99mTc)-labeled tracers,

uch as 99mTc-sestaMIBI (99mTc-MIBI), are usednterchangeably for the detection of coronary arteryisease. However, there are substantial differences

n myocardial uptake, clearance kinetics, and bio-istribution among the 99mTc-labeled tracers and01Tl (1,2), which should be considered in myocar-ial perfusion imaging (MPI).

See page 1209

The accuracy of MPI is dependent on the biodis-ribution of tracers in organs adjacent to the heart (i.e.,ungs, liver) and affects the optimal timing of MPI (3).atients with a critical coronary stenosis who arenable to exercise are injected during pharmacologicalasodilator stress to mimic alterations in coronary flowssociated with exercise stress. The level or type oftress can affect the biodistribution (4–8). The bio-istribution of 99mTc-MIBI is altered by exercise orharmacological stress, suggesting that the kineticslso are influenced (3). The uptake of 99mTc-MIBIlateaus at high flows during adenosine vasodilatortress, potentially underestimating myocardial perfu-ion defect size (9).

Adenosine used for stress MPI causes systemicascular and hemodynamic side effects, possiblyltering the biodistribution of radiotracers (9). Mostdverse effects can be attributed to A1, A2B, and A3

denosine receptor stimulation (10). Selective A2A

denosine receptor agonists may reduce unwantedffects but may alter radiotracer kinetics. Regade-oson (CVT-3146, CV Therapeutics, Inc., a sub-idiary of Gilead, Foster City, California), an A2A

gonist, is a potent vasodilator with a short durationf action and minimal hemodynamic effects10,11). Recent clinical trials (12–16) have estab-ished regadenoson as a vasodilator for MPI.

Studies in conscious dogs and humans demon-trated that the dose and rate of regadenosondministration affects hemodynamics (11) and cor-nary flow (10,17,18). Differential effects of rega-enoson on renal and splanchnic flow may affect theiodistribution and clearance of radiotracers, havingn impact on the efficacy of the vasodilator MPI.

Regadenoson duration of action and differentialffects on flow (coronary and systemic) compared withdenosine may result in favorable tracer kinetics for

PI. To determine whether regadenoson results in

avorable conditions for vasodilator MPI, we evaluated s

he uptake, biodistribution, and clearance of 201Tl and9mTc-MIBI during vasodilation with regadenosonnd adenosine in chronic, closed-chest canine models.o establish the linearity of radiotracer uptake during

egadenoson stress, we used acute open-chest canineodels with a critical stenosis.

E T H O D S

urgical preparation. Fasting adult mongrel dogs (230.9 kg) were anesthetized with intravenous sodium

hiamylal (20 mg/kg). Animals were intubated andentilated with a mixture of halothane (0.5% to 1.5%),itrous oxide and oxygen (N2O:O2 � 3:1). An elec-rocardiogram (ECG) lead was used for heart rateHR) and rhythm monitoring. The protocol waspproved by Yale Institutional Animal Carend Use Committee in compliance withuiding principles of the American Physio-ogic Society on research animal use.

HRONIC MODEL. Venous access was es-ablished for administration of radiotracernd regadenoson or adenosine. A femoralrtery was cannulated for blood samplingnd hemodynamic monitoring. To deter-ine radiotracer kinetics and biodistribu-

ion, sequential imaging was performed inlosed-chest (n � 7) dogs under light anes-hesia and physiological conditions withonitoring.

CUTE MODEL. To determine the effects ofegadenoson on coronary flow and myocar-ial radiotracer uptake, an open-chest caninereparation (n � 7) with a critical stenosisas used. A left lateral thoracotomy waserformed and the heart suspended in aericardial cradle. The proximal left ante-ior descending (LAD) and circumflex (LCX) ar-eries were dissected for placement of flow probesTransonics Systems Inc., Ithaca, New York). Aroximal critical LCX stenosis was created by these of a hydraulic occluder and adjusted to blunteactive hyperemia to a transient 10-s total coronarycclusion without impairing resting flow. Centralemperature, HR, aortic pressure (AoP), and coro-ary flows were recorded. Radiolabeled micro-pheres (15-�m diameter; Sc-46, Nb-95, Ru-103,nd Sn-113) were injected in the left atrium.rotocol. CHRONIC STUDIES. Dogs had 201Tl and9mTc-MIBI vasodilator stress imaging performedn 2 successive weeks; week 1 with regadenosonnd week 2 with adenosine. The week between

A B B

A N D

AoP �

DPI �

HR �

IS � is

LAD �

artery

LCX �

LV �

MBF �

MPI �

imagi

NI � n

%ID �

SPECT

comp

99mTc

201Tl �

tudies is sufficient to ensure noninteraction be

R E V I A T I O N S

A C R O N YM S

aortic pressure

dynamic planar Imaging

heart rate

chemic

left anterior descending

left circumflex artery

left ventricular

myocardial blood flow

myocardial perfusion

ng

onischemic

percent injected dose

� single-photon emission

uted tomography

� technetium-99m

tween

Page 3: Effects of Adenosine and a Selective A2A Adenosine ...noson (CVT-3146, CV Therapeutics, Inc., a sub-sidiary of Gilead, Foster City, California), an A 2A agonist, is a potent vasodilator

sr�1fsksmwvo

a�(aafs9

am

A

wL

jMrniamsw(AeatswtHnotstwPf

J A C C : C A R D I O V A S C U L A R I M A G I N G , V O L . 2 , N O . 1 0 , 2 0 0 9

O C T O B E R 2 0 0 9 : 1 1 9 8 – 2 0 8

Mekkaoui et al.

Adenosine and Regadenoson Vasodilators

1200

essions. During the first session (Fig. 1A), each dogeceived an intravenous injection of regadenoson (2.5g/kg) over 30 s and then 201Tl (55.5 � 7.4 MBq)0 s later. Dynamic planar imaging (DPI; 15 min)ollowed the injection, along with timed arterial bloodampling for determination of radiotracer clearanceinetics by use of a roller-pump (20 samples at 15/sample, then 10 samples at 30 s/sample). Blood (0.5l) was collected, weighed, and counted in a gamma-ell-counter. Two hours later, the same regadenosonasodilator stress protocol was repeated with injectionf 99mTc-MIBI (843.6 � 148 MBq).

For the second session (Fig. 1B), the dogs receivedn intravenous infusion of adenosine at a rate of 280g/kg/min over 4.5 min. An injection of 201Tl

59.2 � 3.7 MBq) was given 1.5 min into thedenosine infusion. Then DPI and blood withdraw-ls, with use of the same protocol as with regadenoson,ollowed the injection. Two hours later, the adenosinetress protocol was repeated but with injection of9mTc-MIBI (858.4 � 144.3 MBq). The blood clear-nce half-time was calculated by the use of a logarith-ic transform for both tracers with both vasodilators.

CUTE STUDIES. On week 3, open-chest studiesere performed (Fig. 1C) after creation of a criticalCX stenosis. Regadenoson (2.5 �g/kg) was in-

Dynamic Planar Im(DPI)

Blood Clearan(BC)

15 min

201TI

REGADENOSON30 sec

10 sec

ADENOSINE4.5 min

201TI

DPIBC15 min

1.5 min

2 hours

Surgery

Stenosis

RESTMicrospheres

20

REGADENOSON30 sec

15 min

A

B

C

Figure 1. Experimental Protocols and Timelines

The protocol for closed-chest regadenoson studies performed on w(B), and for an acute open-chest study performed on week 3 (C). H99m 201

Tc � technetium-99m; Tl � thallium-201.

ected intravenously over 30 s, and 201Tl (51.8 � 3.7Bq), 99mTc-MIBI (873.2 � 166.5 MBq), and

adiolabeled microspheres were injected simulta-eously 10 s after the regadenoson bolus. To min-

mize redistribution, dogs were euthanized 15 minfter tracer injection. Regional myocardial flow waseasured at rest and stress with radiolabeled micro-

pheres by the use of established methods (2). Heartsere excised and cast with dental molding material

Alginate, Type I, fast-set, Quala Dental Products,DC Milford, Delaware) for ex vivo single-photon

mission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging,voiding most of the confounding effects of attenua-ion and scatter. Hearts were sliced (5 mm), and eachlice was divided into 8 radial pies. Segments under-ent gamma-well-counting for the determination of

racer activity and microsphere flow.emodynamics. Electrocardiogram, AoP, and coro-ary flows were recorded 30 s before and after infusionf the vasodilator (Sonolab, Sonometrics Inc., On-ario, Canada). R-waves were used to segment theignals into individual cardiac cycles. Heart rate, sys-olic and diastolic AoP, and peak LAD and LCX flowere determined every 10 s.lanar imaging. Five-second images were acquiredor the first 30 s followed by 30-s images for the

ngDPIBC

15 min

99m Tc-MIBI

REGADENOSON30 sec

10 sec2 hours

ADENOSINE4.5 min

DPIBC15 min

99m Tc-MIBI

1.5 min

Sacrifice

TRESScrospheres

Ex vivo:SPECT

Gamma well counting

99m Tc-MIBI

sec 15 min

1 (A), for closed-chest adenosine studies performed on week 2dynamic acquisitions started 30 s before infusion of vasodilator.

agi

ce

SMi

1TI

10

eekemo

Page 4: Effects of Adenosine and a Selective A2A Adenosine ...noson (CVT-3146, CV Therapeutics, Inc., a sub-sidiary of Gilead, Foster City, California), an A 2A agonist, is a potent vasodilator

rcq(Wha

b(kpaa(

J A C C : C A R D I O V A S C U L A R I M A G I N G , V O L . 2 , N O . 1 0 , 2 0 0 9

O C T O B E R 2 0 0 9 : 1 1 9 8 – 2 0 8

Mekkaoui et al.

Adenosine and Regadenoson Vasodilators

1201

emaining 14.5 min for analyzing changes in myo-ardial and background activity. Images were ac-uired with a large field-of-view gamma-cameraMillennium VG, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee,

isconsin) by the use of a high-resolution, parallel-ole collimator. Images (256 � 256 matrix) werecquired without magnification in an anterior view

Figure 2. Hemodynamic Response in the Chronic Studies

Heart rate, systolic, and diastolic aortic pressure time-dependent chisotope: (A) 201Tl during regadenoson stress; (B) 201Tl during adenoMIBI during adenosine stress. The dashed line indicates the radiotr

Table 1. Hemodynamic Effects

Radiotracer 201Tl

Stressor Adenosine

Peak values (% baseline)

Diastolic AoP 76.6 � 5.1*

Systolic AoP 84.9 � 3.8*

Heart rate 131.3 � 4.7*

2-min post-values (% baseline)

Diastolic AoP 81.9 � 4.5*†

Systolic AoP 89.7 � 3.3*†

Heart rate 124.3 � 4.5*†

End values (% baseline)

Diastolic AoP 97.5 � 2.4

Systolic AoP 97.7 � 2.9

Heart rate 103.1 � 4.7

Heart rate and systolic and diastolic AoP are shown for select time points after thduring the 2 min after radiotracer injection, and the value at 10 min after infugroups. *p � 0.05 versus baseline. †p � 0.05 versus peak values.AoP � aortic pressure; 99mTc � technetium-99m; 201Tl � thallium-201.

with the adenosine response. The hemodynamic effect for each stresso

y the use of appropriate energy windows for 201Tl71 � 7.5% keV), and 99mTc-MIBI (140 � 7.5%eV). Regions-of-interest were drawn over bloodool, myocardium, liver, lung, and kidney. Time-ctivity curves were generated for each organ, andctivity was expressed as percent-injected dose/pixel%ID/pixel) by the use of an external point source

es (%baseline) after the stressor infusion (shaded box) for eachstress; (C) 99mTc-MIBI during regadenoson stress; and (D) 99mTc-injection. The rapid effect of regadenoson is evident compared

99mTc-MIBI

egadenoson Adenosine Regadenoson

70.5 � 6.0* 75.5 � 2.6* 75.7 � 4.0*

81.7 � 5.3* 83.2 � 2.5* 85.1 � 2.1*

22.2 � 8.5* 123.3 � 7.3* 120.7 � 8.1*

77.5 � 5.0*† 80.8 � 2.1*† 80.1 � 4.1*†

87.7 � 3.9*† 86.5 � 2.2*† 89.2 � 2.4*†

13.5 � 8.9† 117.8 � 6.5* 116.1 � 7.0*†

90.2 � 4.8* 92.4 � 3.7* 89.4 � 1.3*

89.2 � 4.5* 93.6 � 3.1* 92.0 � 1.7*

00.2 � 6.4 97.0 � 3.3 101.1 � 5.7

ssor infusion. Shown are the peak alteration from baseline, the average changeof the stressor. There was no difference in the hemodynamic effects between

angsineacer

R

1

1

1

e stresion

r did not differ between isotope injections.

Page 5: Effects of Adenosine and a Selective A2A Adenosine ...noson (CVT-3146, CV Therapeutics, Inc., a sub-sidiary of Gilead, Foster City, California), an A 2A agonist, is a potent vasodilator

oaaMw2

cbmk1

8aflprgpEabcfb

snrfi3ate

tp(dfi9

ctS(rtfla

J A C C : C A R D I O V A S C U L A R I M A G I N G , V O L . 2 , N O . 1 0 , 2 0 0 9

O C T O B E R 2 0 0 9 : 1 1 9 8 – 2 0 8

Mekkaoui et al.

Adenosine and Regadenoson Vasodilators

1202

f known activity. The myocardium-to-liver activitynd myocardium-to-lung ratios, at 15 min for 201Tlnd 99mTc-MIBI, were compared.yocardial blood flow. Myocardial segments wereeighed and counted within 24 h for determination of

01Tl and 99mTc activity in a gamma-scintillation-ounter (Packard Instruments, Milford, Connecticut)y the use of energy windows for 201Tl, 99mTc, and allicrospheres (201Tl: 67 to 91 keV, 99mTc: 130 to 170

eV, 51Cr: 290 to 360 keV, 113Sn: 361 to 440 keV,03Ru: 460 to 550 keV, 95Nb: 700 to 810 keV, 46Sc:11 to 1,160 keV). Samples were recounted 1 weekfter radiotracer injection to determine microsphereow. Myocardial flow was calculated by the use ofreviously published methods, with correction foradiotracer decay, spill-up, and spill-down (2). Re-ional flow was expressed in ml/min/g, as well as aercent nonischemic and ischemic.x vivo SPECT imaging. Ex vivo dual-isotope 201Tlnd 99mTc-MIBI SPECT imaging was performedy use of the same dual-head rotational gamma-amera, collimators, and energy windows appliedor in vivo SPECT imaging. Images were acquired

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Cle

aran

ceH

alft

ime

(min

)

Regadenoson

n=6 n=7

p<0.01C

201TI (n=6)99m Tc-MIBI (n=7)

RegadenosonA

Time (min)

00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Blo

od

Act

ivit

y (%

Max

)

Figure 3. Clearance Half-Time and Biodistribution

The time-arterial blood activity curves for 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI afterclearance half-times for 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI with regadenoson andfor 99mTc-MIBI than for 201Tl with both stressors. (D) An example ofdenoson infusion is shown. The images show where the regions-of-the logarithm (%ID/pixel) for 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI with both stressoent between stressors for 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI (I and J, respectively

y the use of a 360° circular-orbit, in a step-and- o

hoot fashion (64 � 64 matrix; 5-mm slice thick-ess). No attenuation or scatter correction wasequired. Images were reconstructed by the use ofltered back-projection with ramp-filters. A-dimensional low-pass filter (Butterworth, order-4nd cutoff 0.35) was applied to post-reconstructionransverse SPECT slices, and images were reori-nted into cardiac-specific axes.

The Yale-CQ-algorithm was used to quantifyhe SPECT images (19,20). Circumferential countrofiles were generated for a series of left ventricularLV) short-axis images. Three anatomic slices wereivided into 128 radial sectors. Defects were de-ned as counts �80% of the maximum. 201Tl and9mTc-MIBI integrated defect scores (%LV) werealculated, providing an index of both the magni-ude and extent of the perfusion abnormality.tatistical analysis. Ischemic (IS) and nonischemicNI) segments were defined by a coronary floweserve �1.5 and �2.5, respectively. On the basis ofhis myocardial segmentation, IS/NI tracer andow ratios were calculated and compared. All valuesre expressed as mean � SEM. Statistical differences

Adenosine

n=5 n=5

p<0.01

201TI99m Tc-MIBI

Adenosine

Time (min)

00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

201TI (n=5)99m Tc-MIBI (n=5)

infusion of regadenoson (A) or adenosine (B) are shown. (C) Thenosine are shown. The clearance half-time is significantly shorterynamic series of 99mTc-MIBI planar images, following a 30-s rega-rest were drawn. The time-dependent biodistribution is shown asto H). The biodistribution at 15 min after injection was no differ-ntinued on next page.

0

B

theadea dinters (E). Co

f the physiologic, hemodynamic, and radiolabeled

Page 6: Effects of Adenosine and a Selective A2A Adenosine ...noson (CVT-3146, CV Therapeutics, Inc., a sub-sidiary of Gilead, Foster City, California), an A 2A agonist, is a potent vasodilator

ttaswb%

R

Crp(0cv0tb

rtaddau

R

T

s(0m

trds

J A C C : C A R D I O V A S C U L A R I M A G I N G , V O L . 2 , N O . 1 0 , 2 0 0 9

O C T O B E R 2 0 0 9 : 1 1 9 8 – 2 0 8

Mekkaoui et al.

Adenosine and Regadenoson Vasodilators

1203

racer between the regadenoson- and adenosine-reated animals were assessed using a one-waynalysis of variance. For conditions that demon-trated a significant main effect, post-hoc analysesere performed with either a t test (comparisonetween 2 populations) or a z test (comparison withbaseline).

E S U L T S

hronic studies. HEMODYNAMICS. A 30-s bolus ofegadenoson and a 4.5-min infusion of adenosineroduced similar hemodynamic effects (p � NS)Table 1). Peak HR significantly increased (p �.05), and peak systolic and diastolic AoP signifi-antly decreased (p � 0.05) relative to baselinealues. These parameters were significantly (p �.05) different than baseline 2 min after injection ofhe radiotracers. These values tended to return to

Figure 3. Continued.

aseline within 10 min (Fig. 2). The peak effect of l

egadenoson occurs �30 s after the bolus, whereashe peak effect of adenosine occurs 1.5 to 2 minfter beginning the infusion, corresponding to ra-iotracer injection. The duration of the peak hemo-ynamic effect was shorter for regadenoson than fordenosine, although sufficient to create differentialptake of 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI.

ADIOTRACER CLEARANCE AND BIODISTRIBU-

ION. The arterial blood clearance half-time wasignificantly faster (p � 0.01) for 99mTc-MIBIregadenoson: 1.4 � 0.03 min; adenosine: 1.5 �.08 min) than for 201Tl (regadenoson: 2.5 � 0.16in; adenosine: 2.7 � 0.04 min) (Figs. 3A to 3C).There was no statistical difference in the biodis-

ribution of 201Tl or 99mTc-MIBI associated withegadenoson and adenosine. However, 201Tl (rega-enoson: 1.63 � 0.31; adenosine: 1.37 � 0.20) hadignificantly greater (p � 0.05) myocardium-to-

iver ratios compared with 99mTc-MIBI (regadeno-
Page 7: Effects of Adenosine and a Selective A2A Adenosine ...noson (CVT-3146, CV Therapeutics, Inc., a sub-sidiary of Gilead, Foster City, California), an A 2A agonist, is a potent vasodilator

samn9

1

uwAindAsm1i0ttbtv

M

ms(nflpu

M

F2

it

J A C C : C A R D I O V A S C U L A R I M A G I N G , V O L . 2 , N O . 1 0 , 2 0 0 9

O C T O B E R 2 0 0 9 : 1 1 9 8 – 2 0 8

Mekkaoui et al.

Adenosine and Regadenoson Vasodilators

1204

on: 0.56 � 0.06; adenosine: 0.60 � 0.06) at 15 minfter injection. There was no difference in theyocardium-to-lung ratio between 201Tl (regade-

oson: 2.84 � 0.64; adenosine: 2.36 � 0.47) and9mTc-MIBI (regadenoson: 2.12 � 0.18; adenosine:

Figure 4. Hemodynamic Response in Acute Studies

The hemodynamic response to the 30-s regadenoson bolus(shaded box) for the acute studies: heart rate (A), systolic anddiastolic aortic pressure response (B), and LAD and LCX coro-nary flow (C) responses. All values are %baseline. The dashedline indicates the radiotracer injection. There was a 3-foldincrease in nonstenotic LAD flow and no increase in LCX flow.LAD � left anterior descending; LCX � left circumflex artery.

.82 � 0.09) at 15 min after injection. The radiotracer

ptake during the initial 15 min after injection alsoas expressed as a %ID/pixel (Figs. 3D to 3J).cute studies. HEMODYNAMICS. In the acute stud-

es (n � 7), the 30-s bolus of regadenoson caused aearly significant increase in HR (p � 0.08) and aecrease (p � 0.05) in both systolic and diastolicoP during the 2-min post-radiotracer injection,

imilar to the chronic studies. The pressures re-ained mildly reduced (�10 mm Hg; p � 0.05) at

0 min after regadenoson administration. The flown the stenotic LCX increased on average 6.7% (p �.05) over baseline, which is consistent with abla-ion of reactive hyperemia. In the LAD, however,he flow significantly increased (2.5- to 3-foldaseline; p � 0.001) during the 2 min after radio-racer injection. The LAD flow returned to baselinealues at 10 min after regadenoson infusion (Fig. 4).

YOCARDIAL MICROSPHERE BLOOD FLOW. Trans-ural myocardial microsphere blood flow (Fig. 5) was

imilar between IS (0.86 � 0.24 ml/min/g) and NI0.89 � 0.26 ml/min/g) territories at baseline. Regade-oson caused �3.3-fold increase in myocardial bloodow (MBF) in the NI territory (2.98 � 0.98 ml/min/g;� 0.05), whereas MBF in the ischemic territory was

nchanged (0.95 � 0.23 ml/min/g, p � NS).

YOCARDIAL RADIOTRACER ACTIVITY VERSUS

LOW. The deficit in relative myocardial uptake of01Tl and 99mTc-MIBI in the stenotic region dur-ng regadenoson vasodilator stress underestimatedhe relative microsphere blood flow deficit. The

Ischemic

Non-Ischemic

RegadenosonBaseline0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

n=6 n=6 n=6 n=6

p<0.05

Tran

smu

ral F

low

(m

l/min

/g)

p<0.05

Figure 5. Transmural Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow

Average microsphere flows for ischemic and nonischemicregions at rest and during vasodilator stress. The blood flowsare comparable at rest in both regions. Flows during regadeno-son vasodilator stress increased 3-fold in the nonischemic regionbut remained unchanged in the ischemic region with a critical

stenosis.
Page 8: Effects of Adenosine and a Selective A2A Adenosine ...noson (CVT-3146, CV Therapeutics, Inc., a sub-sidiary of Gilead, Foster City, California), an A 2A agonist, is a potent vasodilator

sdmaiFmrl2

htflmae0wt

E

rtsaocu(l9

i

other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

J A C C : C A R D I O V A S C U L A R I M A G I N G , V O L . 2 , N O . 1 0 , 2 0 0 9

O C T O B E R 2 0 0 9 : 1 1 9 8 – 2 0 8

Mekkaoui et al.

Adenosine and Regadenoson Vasodilators

1205

patial variation of radiotracer uptake and myocar-ial microsphere flow is shown for a representativeyocardial short-axis slice (Fig. 6A). Relative 201Tl

ctivity approximated the flow deficit within theschemic region better than 99mTc-MIBI activity.igure 6B shows the relationship between absoluteyocardial flow and relative 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI

etention for all segments of 1 dog. There was ainear relationship between relative myocardial01Tl activity and microsphere flow, even at theigh flows achieved with regadenoson. However,here was considerable “roll-off” of 99mTc-MIBI atows �1.5 times above resting flow (Fig. 6B). Theyocardial IS/NI ratio of both 201Tl (0.53 � 0.02)

nd 99mTc-MIBI (0.69 � 0.03) significantly under-stimated (p � 0.001) the true flow deficit (0.34 �.02). However, the underestimation associatedith 201Tl activity was significantly (p � 0.001) less

han that observed for 99mTc-MIBI (Fig. 6C).

X VIVO SPECT QUANTIFICATION. The differences inelative regional 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI uptake withinhe stenotic territory during regadenoson stress, demon-trated by gamma-well-counting, could also be visu-lized on ex vivo SPECT imaging, under conditionsf minimal attenuation and scatter. Ex vivo imageslearly showed the perfusion heterogeneity createdsing regadenoson in the presence of a critical stenosisFig. 7A). However, the perfusion defect appearsarger and more noticeable with 201Tl compared with9mTc-MIBI, despite the lower count density. Thentegrated perfusion defect score was significantly

Figure 7. SPECT Integrated Defect Size

(A) Series of 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI ex vivo short-axis slices from a repretative dog are shown. With a critical stenosis, there were no marked pfusion defects; however, the perfusion defects were visually smaller in99mTc-MIBI images compared with 201Tl images. (B) The integrated defmagnitude calculated using the Yale-CQ-quantitative-program is show

Figure 6. Perfusion Deficit

(A) Circumferential profile from a representative left ventricularshort-axis slice is shown. There was uniform flow at rest and asignificant heterogeneity of flow with regadenoson as measuredby microspheres. (B) Tracer activity (%Ischemic) versus flow isshown. Regional myocardial 99mTc-MIBI activity plateaus atgreater flows. (C) The ischemic/nonischemic ratio for flow, 201Tl,and 99mTc-MIBI is shown. Both radiotracers significantly underes-timate flow heterogeneity. IS � ischemic; NI � nonischemic;

sen-er-

ectn.

%LV � percent left ventricular; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

Page 9: Effects of Adenosine and a Selective A2A Adenosine ...noson (CVT-3146, CV Therapeutics, Inc., a sub-sidiary of Gilead, Foster City, California), an A 2A agonist, is a potent vasodilator

lw

D

Tstcarhimc2wiwawt

tfltTtbo(vdsiMfhv

aqnsvcO9

giadap

hrfltrufr2

r2

r9

a

seaarlssittseiSs(9

ao

rctgr9

bar(2

liId

J A C C : C A R D I O V A S C U L A R I M A G I N G , V O L . 2 , N O . 1 0 , 2 0 0 9

O C T O B E R 2 0 0 9 : 1 1 9 8 – 2 0 8

Mekkaoui et al.

Adenosine and Regadenoson Vasodilators

1206

arger (p � 0.05) with 201Tl (22 � 2.8 %LV) thanith 99mTc-MIBI (17 � 1.7 %LV) (Fig. 7B).

I S C U S S I O N

he current study compared the effects of regadeno-on and adenosine on systemic hemodynamics, radio-racer biodistribution, and clearance kinetics in clini-ally relevant canine models to define the optimalpproach for MPI by the use of vasodilator stress. Aegadenoson bolus (2.5 �g/kg) produced systemicemodynamic effects similar to a 4.5-min adenosine

nfusion. Regadenoson created a 2.5- to 3-fold aug-entation in microspheres flow. The HR, AoP, and

oronary flow remained altered during the critical-min post-radiotracer injection. These effects on flowere comparable to those observed by Lieu et al. (18)

n human studies, in which they used a Doppler flowire measuring the coronary flow velocity in response to400-�g or 500-�g bolus of regadenoson. These dosesere greater than what was administered to the dogs in

he current study after body mass correction.Although regadenoson and adenosine are known

o have differential effects on renal and splanchnicow (10), both vasodilators caused a similar biodis-ribution and clearance of 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI.he use of DPI demonstrated a favorable biodis-

ribution of both radiotracers, which was compara-le between the vasodilators. Unexpectedly, webserved a faster blood clearance of 99mTc-MIBI1.5 min) compared with 201Tl (2.5 min) with bothasodilators. This finding suggests that a longeruration of vasodilator stress, regardless of thepecific vasodilator, might be more important afternjection of 201Tl than after injection of 99mTc-

IBI. However, 201Tl performed better as a per-usion agent for the detection of relative floweterogeneity using regadenoson as defined by exivo SPECT and well-counting techniques.

The injection of 201Tl or 99mTc-MIBI 10 sfter the 30-s bolus of regadenoson provided high-uality ex vivo SPECT images, demonstrating sig-ificant heterogeneity of relative myocardial perfu-ion in the presence of a critical stenosis. These exivo images were acquired under ideal imagingonditions with minimal attenuation and scatter.n the basis of tissue counting, both 201Tl and

9mTc-MIBI underestimated the true MBF hetero-eneity as measured using microspheres. This find-ng is consistent with previous studies in which theuthors evaluated 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI MPIuring adenosine stress (9) and other selective A2Adenosine agonists (21). We observed the expected

lateau of radiotracer uptake at higher flows, which p

as been attributed to a diffusion limitation ofadiotracer uptake. In the case of 201Tl, some of theow underestimation may be attributed to differen-ial washout of 201Tl from the normal and ischemicegions, since the radiotracer distribution was eval-ated at 15 min after radiotracer injection. There-ore, there may have been a slight component of 201Tledistribution contributing to the observed plateau of01Tl retention. Despite the potential for early 201Tledistribution, the more linear myocardial uptake of01Tl relative to flow during vasodilator stress withegadenoson suggests that 201Tl may be better than9mTc-MIBI or other similar 99mTc-labeled perfusiongents for use with vasodilator stress.

Although in this study a matched group of acutetudies was not performed with adenosine, Glovert al. (9) previously reported similar results usingdenosine in an open-chest canine study. Glover etl. (9) evaluated 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI uptakeelative to microsphere flow in the presence of 2evels of stenosis. Their creation of a “criticaltenosis” was designed to ablate reactive hyperemia,imilar to our acute studies. The microsphere flowsn both studies demonstrated no increase in flow inhe stenotic territory and �3.5-fold flow increase inhe remote territory in response to vasodilatortress. Glover et al. (9) used planar imaging ofxcised LV slices from dogs euthanized 5 min afternjection of radiotracers compared with ex vivoPECT imaging in our study. They demonstrated aimilar underestimation of the true flow deficit0.17 � 0.03) with both 201Tl (0.37 � 0.05) and9mTc-MIBI (0.53 � 0.06) and that 201Tl providedbetter estimation of the flow deficit (9), similar tour observation using regadenoson.The recent ADVANCE (ADenoscan Versus

egAdenosoN Comparative Evaluation for Myo-ardial Perfusion Imaging) phae 3 multicenter in-ernational trial showed no difference between re-adenoson and adenosine for determination ofeversible perfusion defects with 99mTc-MIBI or9mTc-Tetrofosmin, although the chi-squares foroth the adenosine-regadenoson and adenosine-denosine comparisons were only 0.63 or 0.64,espectively, suggesting only a fair concordance14). On the basis of our experimental findings,01Tl may offer a clinical advantage over the 99mTc-abeled perfusion agents and improve test reproduc-bility for determination of the extent of ischemia.mportantly, the current finding regarding the bio-istribution and ex vivo SPECT imaging would

redict that there should be no significant clini-
Page 10: Effects of Adenosine and a Selective A2A Adenosine ...noson (CVT-3146, CV Therapeutics, Inc., a sub-sidiary of Gilead, Foster City, California), an A 2A agonist, is a potent vasodilator

cf

iMwhdlsuHca

eulAttltofwspvaM

oa

mcidcatvd�i

C

Taicdsisti

ATXB

Rso

R

J A C C : C A R D I O V A S C U L A R I M A G I N G , V O L . 2 , N O . 1 0 , 2 0 0 9

O C T O B E R 2 0 0 9 : 1 1 9 8 – 2 0 8

Mekkaoui et al.

Adenosine and Regadenoson Vasodilators

1207

al difference between regadenoson and adenosineor MPI.

Although this pre-clinical study provides importantnsight regarding regadenoson and adenosine stress

PI, these studies were performed during anesthesia,hich could produce confounding effects on systemicemodynamics. In clinical studies (13,14), the hemo-ynamic changes associated with regadenoson were

ess and shorter-lasting than those observed in ourtudy. Our study was specifically performed with these of the volatile anesthetic halothane. Becauseickey et al. (22) found that there was no significant

hange in coronary flow reserve between consciousnd halothane-anesthetized canines.

In addition, to minimize any potential adverseffect, the chronic studies were performed with these of a closed-chest preparation that required veryight anesthesia with halothane and nitrous oxide.lthough halothane is a mild cardiac depressant,

he effects are dose dependent (23,24). Therefore,he light plane of anesthesia used should have hadittle effect on cardiac output and the biodistribu-ion of the radiotracers. Our hemodynamic resultsn anesthetized dogs closely matched the resultrom previous studies on conscious dogs (11) andere within physiological ranges throughout the

tudy protocol. Glover et al. (9) used sodiumentobarbital anesthesia in their study and showedery similar hemodynamic responses to adenosinend similar kinetic behavior of 201Tl and 99mTc-

IBI during adenosine stress (9).Our anesthetized preparation offers advantages

ver clinical studies or conscious preparations, en-

J Nucl Med 1989;30:301–11. Coron Artery Dis 1

ovement, which is a significant confounder inlinical studies with repeated imaging. The changesn flow that we observed in our experimental modeluring vasodilator stress are concordant with alinical study (25) in which the authors used restnd adenosine oxygen-15 water positron emissionomographic imaging in control subjects. Coronaryasodilator reserve (3.16 � 1.4) in control patientsuring adenosine stress was nearly identical to the3.3-fold increase we obtained in the NI territory

n response to regadenoson vasodilator stress.

O N C L U S I O N S

he bolus administration of regadenoson producedhyperemic response comparable to a standard

nfusion of adenosine. The biodistribution andlearance kinetics of both 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBIuring regadenoson were similar to adenosine va-odilation. Ex vivo perfusion images under the mostdeal conditions permitted detection of a criticaltenosis, although 201Tl offered significant advan-ages over 99mTc-MIBI for perfusion imaging dur-ng regadenoson vasodilator stress.

cknowledgmentshe authors acknowledge the technical assistance ofiao-Yu Hu, Brian Bourke, Carol Akirav, Lorirown, and Stacy Sullivan.

eprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Albert J. Sinu-as, Yale University School of Medicine, Nuclear Cardi-logy, 3FMP, P.O. Box 208017, New Haven, Connect-

bling serial imaging without risk of any subject icut 06520-8017. E-mail: [email protected].

E F E R E N C E S

1. Canby RC, Silber S, Pohost GM.Relations of the myocardial imagingagents 99mTc-MIBI and 201T1 tomyocardial blood flow in a caninemodel of myocardial ischemic insult.Circulation 1990;81:289–96.

2. Sinusas AJ, Watson DD, Cannon JM,Jr., Beller GA. Effect of ischemia andpostischemic dysfunction on myocar-dial uptake of technetium-99m-labeled methoxyisobutyl isonitrile andthallium-201. J Am Coll Cardiol1989;14:1785–93.

3. Wackers FJ, Berman DS, MaddahiJ, et al. Technetium-99m hexakis2-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile: humanbiodistribution, dosimetry, safety, andpreliminary comparison to thallium-201 for myocardial perfusion imaging.

4. Calnon DA, Glover DK, Beller GA, et al.Effects of dobutamine stress on myocar-dial blood flow, 99mTc sestamibi up-take, and systolic wall thickening in thepresence of coronary artery stenoses: im-plications for dobutamine stress testing.Circulation 1997;96:2353–60.

5. Candell-Riera J, Santana-Boado C,Castell-Conesa J, et al. Simultaneous di-pyridamole/maximal subjective exercisewith 99mTc-MIBI SPECT: improveddiagnostic yield in coronary artery disease.J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:531–6.

6. Cramer MJ, Verzijlbergen JF, Van derWall EE, et al. Head-to-head com-parison between technetium-99m-sestamibi and thallium-201 tomo-graphic imaging for the detection ofcoronary artery disease using com-bined dipyridamole-exercise stress.

994;5:787–91.

7. Marwick T, Willemart B, D’HondtAM, et al. Selection of the optimalnonexercise stress for the evaluation ofischemic regional myocardial dysfunc-tion and malperfusion. Comparison ofdobutamine and adenosine usingechocardiography and 99mTc-MIBIsingle photon emission computed to-mography. Circulation 1993;87:345–54.

8. Santos-Ocampo CD, Herman SD,Travin MI, et al. Comparison of ex-ercise, dipyridamole, and adenosine byuse of technetium 99m sestamibi to-mographic imaging. J Nucl Cardiol1994;1:57–64.

9. Glover DK, Ruiz M, Edwards NC,et al. Comparison between 201Tl and99mTc sestamibi uptake duringadenosine-induced vasodilation as afunction of coronary stenosis severity.

Circulation 1995;91:813–20.
Page 11: Effects of Adenosine and a Selective A2A Adenosine ...noson (CVT-3146, CV Therapeutics, Inc., a sub-sidiary of Gilead, Foster City, California), an A 2A agonist, is a potent vasodilator

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

Kma

J A C C : C A R D I O V A S C U L A R I M A G I N G , V O L . 2 , N O . 1 0 , 2 0 0 9

O C T O B E R 2 0 0 9 : 1 1 9 8 – 2 0 8

Mekkaoui et al.

Adenosine and Regadenoson Vasodilators

1208

0. Zhao G, Linke A, Xu X, et al. Com-parative profile of vasodilation by CVT-3146, a novel A2A receptor agonist, andadenosine in conscious dogs. J Pharma-col Exp Ther 2003;307:182–9.

1. Trochu JN, Zhao G, Post H, et al.Selective A2A adenosine receptor ago-nist as a coronary vasodilator in con-scious dogs: potential for use in myocar-dial perfusion imaging. J CardiovascPharmacol 2003;41:132–9.

2. Cerqueira MD, Nguyen P, Staehr P,Underwood SR, Iskandrian AE. Ef-fects of age, gender, obesity, and dia-betes on the efficacy and safety of theselective A2A agonist regadenosonversus adenosine in myocardial perfu-sion imaging integrated ADVANCE-MPI trial results. J Am Coll CardiolImg 2008;1:307–16.

3. Hendel RC, Bateman TM, CerqueiraMD, et al. Initial clinical experiencewith regadenoson, a novel selectiveA2A agonist for pharmacologic stresssingle-photon emission computed to-mography myocardial perfusion imag-ing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:2069–75.

4. Iskandrian AE, Bateman TM, Be-lardinelli L, et al. Adenosine versusregadenoson comparative evaluationin myocardial perfusion imaging: re-sults of the ADVANCE phase 3 mul-ticenter international trial. J Nucl Car-diol 2007;14:645–58.

5. Leaker BR, O’Connor B, Hansel TT,et al. Safety of regadenoson, an adeno-sine A2A receptor agonist for myocar-

dial perfusion imaging, in mild asthma

and moderate asthma patients: a ran-domized, double-blind, placebo-con-trolled trial. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:329–36.

16. Thomas GS, Tammelin BR, Schiff-man GL, et al. Safety of regadenoson,a selective adenosine A2A agonist, inpatients with chronic obstructive pul-monary disease: A randomized,double-blind, placebo-controlled trial(RegCOPD trial). J Nucl Cardiol2008;15:319–28.

17. Gao Z, Li Z, Baker SP, et al. Novelshort-acting A2A adenosine receptoragonists for coronary vasodilation: in-verse relationship between affinity andduration of action of A2A agonists.J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001;298:209–18.

18. Lieu HD, Shryock JC, von MeringGO, et al. Regadenoson, a selectiveA2A adenosine receptor agonist, causesdose-dependent increases in coronaryblood flow velocity in humans. J NuclCardiol 2007;14:514–20.

19. Liu YH, Sinusas AJ, DeMan P, ZaretBL, Wackers FJ. Quantification ofSPECT myocardial perfusion images:methodology and validation of theYale-CQ method. J Nucl Cardiol1999;6:190–204.

20. Liu YH, Sinusas AJ, Shi CQ, et al.Quantification of technetium 99m-labeled sestamibi single-photon emissioncomputed tomography based on meancounts improves accuracy for assess-ment of relative regional myocardial

blood flow: experimental validation in t

a canine model. J Nucl Cardiol 1996;3:312–20.

1. Glover DK, Ruiz M, Takehana K, et al.Pharmacological stress myocardial per-fusion imaging with the potent andselective A(2A) adenosine receptor ago-nists ATL193 and ATL146e adminis-tered by either intravenous infusion orbolus injection. Circulation 2001;104:1181–7.

2. Hickey RF, Sybert PE, Verrier ED,Cason BA. Effects of halothane, en-flurane, and isoflurane on coronaryblood flow autoregulation and coro-nary vascular reserve in the canineheart. Anesthesiology 1988;68:21–30.

3. Bahlman SH, Eger EI, II, Smith NT,et al. The cardiovascular effects of ni-trous oxide-halothane anesthesia inman. Anesthesiology 1971;35:274–85.

4. Vatner SF, Smith NT. Effects of halo-thane on left ventricular function anddistribution of regional blood flow indogs and primates. Circ Res 1974;34:155–67.

5. Uren NG, Melin JA, De Bruyne B,Wijns W, Baudhuin T, Camici PG.Relation between myocardial bloodflow and the severity of coronary-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1782–8.

ey Words: regadenoson yyocardial perfusion imaging y

denosine y biodistribution y

racer kinetics.