effect of glutathione on the cadmium chelation

Upload: sebastian-montes

Post on 14-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Effect of Glutathione on the Cadmium Chelation

    1/6

  • 7/29/2019 Effect of Glutathione on the Cadmium Chelation

    2/6

    the compounds to other organs and exacerbating the

    toxicity.5 However, many investigators have reported

    animal studies that demonstrate a possible protective

    role of antioxidants, especially sulfhydryl amino acids,

    on cadmium intoxication.6-9 Although the exact

    mechanism is poorly understood, it is known that

    cadmium exerts at least some of its toxic effectsvia the binding of sulfhydryl groups, subsequent

    denaturing of proteins and/or inactivation of enzymes.10

    Sulfhydryl group amino acids have antioxidant

    affects themselves and their sulfhydryl base may

    compete to bind cadmium with other tissue proteins.10

    Glutathione is a tripeptide ofg-glutamylcysteinyl-

    glycine, available for intravenous administration. In

    our previous study,11 we reported that intravenous

    administration of glutathione increased not only

    cysteine levels but also the pool of sulfhydryl group

    amino acids (sum of cysteine, cystine, and methio-nine). Therefore, we hypothesized that cadmium

    chelation should be safer and more effective when the

    chelating agent is administered with glutathione.In order to support this hypothesis, we measured

    the blood cadmium level, renal excretion of cadmium,

    a proximal tubule injury marker (b2-microglobulin),

    and glomerular injury markers (proteinuria, hema-

    turia), during intravenous administration of Ca-

    EDTA with and without glutathione in a patient with

    chronic cadmium intoxication.

    Material and method

    Case report

    A 54-year-old male presented to the toxicology clinic

    at Soonchunhyang Cheonan hospital on 4 October

    2008. The chief complaint was generalized bone pain,

    worse at night and relieved during the day time

    especially by walking. The history was significant for

    the patient working at a factory producing compres-

    sors for air conditioners over the past 24 years (from

    1977.3 to 2001.5). In May 2001, abnormally high

    blood levels of cadmium were noted during a regularscreening test by a doctor employed by the industry to

    monitor workers. The patient reported that, at that

    time, he had intractable bone pain, insomnia, and

    general weakness. The patient was then immediately

    entered into a program for the treatment of cadmium

    intoxication, and he no longer worked at the factory.

    During the first visit to the outpatient toxicology

    clinic, the patient was exhausted, looked chronically-

    ill and very thin, with a body weight of 49.5 kg and a

    height of 172 cm. The blood pressure was 100/60

    mm Hg, with a weak pulse pressure (60/min), and the

    respiratory rate was 20/min. The results of the routine

    blood chemistry, CBC, and urinalysis are summarized

    in Table 1.

    Experimental treatmentIn an attempt to provide new aggressive treatment, we

    designed a protocol for Ca-EDTA chelation with

    glutathione. With the patients consent, we adminis-

    tered 500 mg of Ca-EDTA and 50 mg/kg of

    glutathione alone or together in 1 L of normal saline

    over 24 hours using a drop factor and repeated the

    treatment for 12 consecutive days. The first 3 days

    were used for the determination of basal levels (only

    saline administration, basal group); the second 3 days

    for Ca-EDTA only (EDTA group), the third 3 days

    for Ca-EDTA with glutathione (EDTA with

    glutathione group), and the last 3 days for glutathione

    only (glutathione group). Blood samples and 24-hour

    urine were obtained everyday to measure creatinine,

    cadmium, and b2-microglobulin levels. One month

    later, the same protocol was repeated and six blood

    and urine samples obtained for each group (Figure 1).

    Assay

    The cadmium levels were measured by a flameless

    atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS 800

    Perkin-Elmer, Germany). b2-microglobulin was

    measured by the radioimmune assay method (SPAC-S

    b2-microglobulin micro kit, Daiichi Co., Japan).

    Statistics

    The data is presented as mean + standard deviation.

    The parameters were compared with the Kruskal-

    Wallis test among groups and ap < 0.05 was considered

    significant.

    Results

    The blood cadmium level was higher when EDTAwas infused together with glutathione (7.44 + 0.73

    mg/L, p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U) compared to the

    basal level of 4.6 + 0.44 mg/L (Figure 2). However,

    there was no significant difference between the basal

    level and the glutathione alone (5.55 + 0.90 mg/L) or

    the EDTA alone (5.53 + 1.03 mg/L; Figure 2). The

    basal renal cadmium excretion was 23.4 + 15.81

    mg/g creatinine. It increased to 89.23 + 58.52 mg/g

    creatinine (p < 0.01) when EDTA was given with glu-

    tathione. The renal cadmium excretion was 9.87 +

    80 Human and Experimental Toxicology 30(1)

  • 7/29/2019 Effect of Glutathione on the Cadmium Chelation

    3/6

    3.02 mg/g creatinine for glutathione alone, and 20.52

    + 12.42 mg/g creatinine for EDTA alone (Figure 3).

    The protein/creatinine ratio in the urine was 109.39

    + 17.29 mg/g in the basal state, 117.43 + 14.17mg/g with glutathione and calcium EDTA adminis-

    tration, 117.44 + 28.67 mg/g for EDTA administra-

    tion alone, and 108.81 + 13.95 mg/g for

    glutathione alone (p > 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis analysis).

    The b2-microglobulin/creatinine ratio in the urine

    was 3378.48 + 1814.20 ng/mg in the basal state,

    5674.94 + 2600.93 ng/mg for glutathione with cal-

    cium EDTA administration, 4767.45 + 1359.81 ng/mg for glutathione administration alone, and

    7178.45 + 2359.81 ng/mg for EDTA alone (p >

    0.05, Kruskal-Wallis analysis). There was no signifi-

    cant change in the serum creatinine levels. In addition,

    Table 1. Laboratory findings at the beginning and 6 months after chelation therapy

    Basal Before 2nd session After 6 months

    CBCWBC (/UL) 10,870 10,020 10,130Hemoglobulin 13.2 13.5 13.8

    Hematocrit 39.5 40.1 42Platelet 225,000 237,000 247,000Blood chemistry

    Albumin (g/dL) 4.5 4.4 4.2Glucose (mg/dL) 116 121 132Total bilirubin (mg/dL) 0.3 0.4 0.3AST(IU/L) 16 17 17ALT(IU/L) 26 22 14BUN (mg/dL) 25 14.6 12.3Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.9 0.9 0.9Calcium (mg/dL) 9.3 9.2 9.1Phosphate (mg/dL) 3.5 3.8 2.9

    Urine analysis

    Specific gravity 1.026 1.020 1.012pH 6.0 6.0 7.0Protein - - -RBC (/HPF) 1-4 1-4 1-4WBC (/HPF)

  • 7/29/2019 Effect of Glutathione on the Cadmium Chelation

    4/6

    microhematuria and proteinuria did not develop over

    the6-month observation period (Table1). The asparate

    aminotransferase (ALT) and blood urea nitrogen

    (BUN) decreased after 6months, which meant the

    safety of this protocol. The results of each session were

    shown in Table 2.

    Discussion

    There are many patients with chronic cadmium intox-

    ication worldwide that have renal disease, chronic

    lung disease, and intractable bone pain. The severity

    of the bone pain can be extreme. Due to the significant

    discomfort of patients clinical toxicologists have been

    investigating new effective treatment modalities that

    are not only safe, but also reduce the risk for exacer-

    bating end-organ toxicity, in patients with chronic

    cadmium intoxication.

    Chelation has notbeen recommended fora number of

    reasons. First, there is no evidence that chelation in

    chronically poisoned animals is associated with long-

    term improvement.5

    Second, most of the cadmium inchronically exposed patients is bound to intracellular

    metallothionein, which greatly reduces its toxicity. Any

    attempt to remove cadmium from these deposits risks

    redistributing the cadmium to other organs.12 Finally,

    many of the common chelating agents might not be

    effective for removing significant amounts of cadmium.

    The results of the present study showed that both the

    blood cadmium levels (Figure 1) and amount of renal

    excretion of cadmium (Figure 2) were significantly

    higher when EDTA was administered with glutathione

    compared to EDTA given alone. Therefore, glutathione

    appears to assist the chelating activity of EDTA for cad-

    mium deposits.Subsequent EDTAand glutathione ther-

    apy has not been effective in our study. The preceding

    glutathione with calciumEDTA application might have

    mobilized most of the available cadmium.

    We cannot explain the precise mechanism underly-ing this synergy. However, the sulfhydryl base of

    glutathione may compete to bind cadmium with other

    tissue proteins. Based on our preliminary study11

    showing 50 mg/kg of glutathione to be safe and to

    increase the SH containing amino acid (cysteine,

    cystine, and methionine) levels for longer than 6

    hours, this might be a useful clinical dose. However,

    further study is necessary to determine the optimum

    dose of glutathione for cadmium chelation in patients

    with chronic cadmium intoxication.

    There was no significant change in the serumcreatinine levels. In addition, microhematuria and pro-

    teinuria did not develop over the 6-month observation

    period (Figure 3). Taken together, no difference in the

    b2-microglobulin/creatinine ratio in urine for this

    chelation procedure suggests that glutathione could

    diminish the nephrotoxic effect of EDTA. However,

    it is not clear whether repeated chelation procedures

    over long treatment duration would cause renal injury.

    The final assessment of the clinical outcome should

    be based on the degree of pain relief provided to the

    patient; this is the most serious complaint of patients

    with chronic cadmium intoxication. Although we didnot use objective measures of pain, 6 months after our

    current chelation trial the patient still reported similar

    levels of pain compared to before the chelation trial.

    Figure 2. Comparison of serum cadmium concentration

    among groups. *p < 0.01 Mann-Whitney test.

    Figure 3. Comparison of urine cadmium concentrationamong groups. p < 0.01 Kruskal-Wallis analysis.

    82 Human and Experimental Toxicology 30(1)

  • 7/29/2019 Effect of Glutathione on the Cadmium Chelation

    5/6

    However, the patient was comforted by the fact that

    the cadmium was being eliminated from his body.

    In conclusion, our results suggest that glutathione

    administration with EDTA might provide a safe and

    effective chelation treatment modality for patients

    with cadmium intoxication.

    References1. Schoeters G, Den Hond E, Zuurbier M, Naginiene R,

    van den Hazel P, Stilianakis N, et al. Cadmium and

    children: exposure and health effects. Acta Paediatr

    Suppl 2006; 95: 50-54.

    2. Nogawa K, Kobayashi E, Okubo Y, Suwazono Y.

    Environmental cadmium exposure, adverse effects and

    preventive measures in Japan. Biometals 2004; 17:

    581-587.

    3. Jin T, Kong Q, Ye T, Wu X, Nordberg GF. Renal

    dysfunction of cadmium-exposed workers residing in a

    cadmium-polluted environment. Biometals 2004; 17:513-518.

    4. Blainey JD, Adams RG, Brewer DB, Harvey TC.

    Cadmium-induced osteomalacia. Br J Ind Med 1980;

    37: 278-284.

    5. Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA, Howland

    MA, Hoffman RS, Nelson LS. Goldfranks toxicologic

    emergency. 7th ed. McGraw Hill, NY USA, 2002:

    p.1254-1259.

    6. Sinha M, Manna P, Sil PC. Taurine protects the

    antioxidant defense system in the erythrocytes

    of cadmium treated mice. BMB Rep 2008; 41:

    657-663.

    7. Manna P, Sinha M, Sil PC. Amelioration of cadmium-

    induced cardiac impairment by taurine. Chem Biol

    Interact 2008; 30: 88-97.

    8. Koyuturk M, Yanardag R, Bolkent S, Tunali S. The

    potential role of combined anti-oxidants against

    cadmium toxicity on liver of rats. Toxicol Ind Health

    2007; 23: 393-401.

    9. Vicente-Sanchez C, Egido J, Sanchez-Gonzalez PD,

    Perez-Barriocanal F, Lopez-Novoa JM, Morales AI.

    Effect of the flavonoid quercetin on cadmium-

    induced hepatotoxicity. Food Chem Toxicol 2008;

    46: 2279-2287.

    10. Vestergaard M, Matsumoto S, Nishikori S, Shiraki K,

    Hirata K, Takagi M. Chelation of cadmium ions by

    phytochelatin synthase: role of the cysteine-richC-terminal. Anal Sci 2008; 24: 277-281.

    11. Hong SY, Gil HW, Yang JO, Lee EY, Kim HK, Kim

    SH, et al. Pharmacokinetics of Glutathione and its

    Meatbolites in Normal Subjects. J Korean Med Sci

    2005; 20: 721-726.

    12. Dalhamn T, Friberg L. Dimercaprol (2, 3-dimercapto-

    propanol) in chronic cadmium poisoning. Acta

    Pharmacol Toxicol 1955; 11: 68-71.

    Table 2. The results of each session (mean)

    1st session 2nd session

    EDTA withglutathione Glutathione EDTA

    EDTA withglutathione Glutathione EDTA

    Serum cadmium (m

    g/L) 7.45 5.7 5.65 7.43 5.40 5.40Urine cadmium (mg/g creatinine) 88.28 17.11 8.75 90.17 19.82 10.98Urine b2-microglobulin (ng/mg creatinine) 6353.94 6514.65 5422.95 5594.88 6856.28 5681.31Urine protein (mg/g creatinine) 123.93 133.18 103.62 110.94 93.84 115.99

    G Hyo-wook et al. 83

  • 7/29/2019 Effect of Glutathione on the Cadmium Chelation

    6/6

    Copyright of Human & Experimental Toxicology is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may

    not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written

    permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.