effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on...

30
1 Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on survival in simulated 1 gastrointestinal tract condition 2 3 4 5 Submitted to Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology 6 7 8 9 Hasiah Ayama, Punnanee Sumpavapol* and Suphitchaya Chanthachum 10 11 12 13 Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Prince of Songkla 14 University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 *Corresponding author: Tel: +66-7428-6366, Fax: +66-7455-8866 23 E-mail address: [email protected] 24

Upload: others

Post on 26-Mar-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

1

Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on survival in simulated 1

gastrointestinal tract condition 2

3

4

5

Submitted to Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology 6

7

8

9

Hasiah Ayama, Punnanee Sumpavapol* and Suphitchaya Chanthachum

10

11

12

13

Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Prince of Songkla 14

University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand 15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

*Corresponding author: Tel: +66-7428-6366, Fax: +66-7455-8866 23

E-mail address: [email protected] 24

Page 2: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

2

Abstract 25

The health benefits of probiotic bacteria have led to their increasing use in foods. 26

Encapsulation has been investigated to improve their survival. In this study, the 27

selection, encapsulation and viability of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic 28

properties in simulated gastrointestinal tract (GIT) condition were investigated. 150 29

isolates of LAB were obtained from 30 samples of raw cow and goat milk and some 30

fermented foods. 9 isolates could survive under GIT condition and only 3 isolates 31

exhibited an antimicrobial activity against all food-borne pathogenic bacteria. Among 32

them, 2 isolates (CM21 and CM53) exhibited bile salt hydrolase activity on 33

glycocholate and glycodeoxycholate agar plates and were identified as Lactobacillus 34

plantarum. CM53 was selected for encapsulation using 1-3% alginate and 2% Hi-maize 35

resistant starch by emulsion system. Viability and releasing ability of encapsulated 36

CM53 in simulated GIT condition were increased in accordance to the alginate 37

concentration and incubation time, respectively. 38

39

Keywords: Encapsulation; Probiotic; Lactic acid bacteria; Simulated gastrointestinal 40

tract, Survival 41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

Page 3: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

3

1. Introduction 51

The consumption of definite species of probiotic microorganisms is beneficial 52

for reducing the duration and severity of diarrhea symptoms. Supplementing a diet with 53

food containing beneficial bacteria can be used as a strategy for preventing diarrhea. 54

Probiotics are defined as living microorganisms, which upon ingestion in certain 55

number exert health benefits beyond inherent basic nutrition. For obtaining health 56

benefits, a minimum of one million probiotic organisms per gram of food is 57

recommended (Capela et al., 2007). The most common commercial bacteria are of the 58

genera Lactobacillus spp. These bacteria are typically saccharolytic (capable of 59

metabolizing sugars), gram-positive, rod shaped and reside in the large bowel (Cook et 60

al., 2012). The key criteria involved in the selection of probiotic microorganisms 61

include the origin and biosafety of the strains, survival during passage through the 62

gastrointestinal tract (GIT), ability to adhere and colonize on the epithelial cell surface 63

of the host GIT, and inhibitory activity against enteric pathogens (Petsuriyawong and 64

Khunajakr, 2011) 65

For processing and storage of foods, probiotic microorganisms may be exposed 66

to low pH, high osmotic pressure and high levels of oxygen. These factors may have 67

deleterious effects on probiotics. The survival of viability probiotic is also affected by 68

acid encountered in the stomach and the bile salts in the intestine tract. 69

Microencapsulation is the process of applying a shell to sensitive probiotic to protect 70

them from their external environment (Capela et al., 2007) and the probiotic cells are 71

retained within an encapsulating matrix. Microencapsulation of probiotics has been 72

examined for increasing their viability in food products and the intestinal tract. The 73

most widely used encapsulating material is alginate, a linear heteropolysaccharide of D-74

Page 4: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

4

mannuronic and L-guluronic acid extracted from various species of algae. Alginate 75

beads can be formed by extrusion and emulsion methods. The use of alginate is 76

privileged because of its simplicity, biocompatibility and inexpensive (Krasaekoopt et 77

al., 2004). Shah and Ravula (2000) found that calcium alginate beads formed by the 78

emulsion technique can increased the viability of probiotic during processing and 79

storage of frozen yoghurt. However, there are several disadvantages of using the 80

emulsion technique including a wide distribution of bead size, difficulty in the 81

automating technique and exceedingly the large beads with diameters ranging from 200 82

to 1000 µm (Poncelet et al., 1992). 83

The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic 84

potential from raw cow and goat milk and some fermented foods. Encapsulation of 85

probiotic with alginate by emulsion technique, the survival of encapsulated cell in 86

simulated GIT condition, the efficiency of encapsulation and morphology of 87

encapsulated cell were then evaluated. 88

89

2. Materials and Methods 90

2.1 Screening of LAB with probiotic potential 91

2.1.1 Isolation of LAB 92

Ten raw cow milk, ten raw goat milk and ten fermented food samples were 93

collected from five markets in Singhanakhon, Am-per meuang, Jana, Hatyai and Sadao 94

districts in Sonkhla province, Thailand. To isolate the LAB, 25 g of each sample were 95

taken aseptically, transferred to sterile 0.85% NaCl (J.T. Baker, USA) and then 96

homogenized using the stomacher (Seward, England). One ml of homogenized samples 97

was removed for diluted by ten-fold dilution with 0.85% NaCl. Appropriate 98

Page 5: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

5

concentrations were pour plate in MRS agar containing 0.5% CaCO3 (Finechem, 99

Australia) and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Difference colonies with clear zone from agar 100

plate were randomly selected from countable plates and then streaked onto MRS agar 101

containing 0.5% CaCO3. Strains with Gram positive and catalase-negative were selected 102

and stored at -20°C in MRS broths containing 20% glycerol (VWR International, 103

England). All strains were subcultured twice prior use. 104

2.1.2 Simulated GIT condition tolerance 105

This analysis was based on the method described by Krasaekoopt et al (2004). 106

Freshly prepared cells were placed in a tube containing sterile simulated gastric juice 107

(phosphate-buffer saline (PBS) pH 2.0 containing 3 mg/ml pepsin (Sigma, USA)) and 108

incubated at 37ºC for 3 h. After incubation, the cells were removed for counting the 109

survival cell and placed in sterile simulated intestinal juice (PBS pH 8.0 containing 3 110

mg/ml pancreatin and 1% bile salt (Sigma, USA)). The tubes were then incubated at 111

37ºC for 4 h. After incubation, a 1 ml aliquot of each isolates was removed and survival 112

rate was counted by drop plate on MRS agar containing 0.5% CaCO3. Isolates which 113

showed survival rate higher than 50% were selected for subsequence tests. Survival rate 114

was calculated by the following expression: 115

Survival (%) =

116

2.1.3 Adhesion to hydrophobic solvent 117

Selected isolates were measured for cell surface hydrophobicity by measuring 118

microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons as described by Ocaña et al. (1999). Cells were 119

harvested by refrigerated centrifugation at 8500 rpm for 4 min, washed twice and 120

suspended in 2 ml of PBS pH 7.2 with the optical density at 600 nm of 0.4-0.6. Then 1 121

ml of n-hexadecane (Merk, Germany) was added to the cell suspensions, mixed by 122

Page 6: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

6

vortex for 3 minutes and allowed to separate at room temperature for 20 min. After the 123

separation, the optical density of the aqueous phase (lower phases) was determined at 124

600 nm. Isolates which showed high hydrophobicity were selected for subsequence test. 125

The index of hydrophobicity was the result of the decrease of turbidity of the aqueous 126

phase calculated by the following expression: 127

Hydrophobicity (%)

128

2.1.4 Antimicrobial activity 129

Bacteria used as tested organism in this study consist of 4 pathogenic bacteria 130

(Escherichia coli DMST 4212, Listeria monocytogenes DMST 1327, Salmonella 131

Typhymurium DMST 562 and Staphylococcus aureus DMST 8840). They were 132

obtained from Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, 133

Thailand (DMST). The antimicrobial activity of selected isolates was determined by 134

agar spot test as described by Buntin el al (2008). Briefly, LAB were grown in MRS 135

broth then spotted on MRS agar. Plates were incubated at 37ºC for 18h. Pathogenic 136

bacteria were grown in Brain heart infusion (BHI) (Difco, USA) at 37ºC for 6 h (to 137

obtain approximately 6 log cfu/ml). Then 1 ml of growth culture was suspended in 9 ml 138

BHI soft agar (0.75%, w/v) and overlaid on MRS agar which LAB were grown. The 139

plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The antimicrobial activity was recorded as 140

growth-free inhibition zones (diameter) around the cell spot. 141

2.1.5 Bile salt hydrolase (BSH) activity 142

The ability of strains to deconjugate primary and secondary bile salts was 143

determined according to Taranto et al. (1996). Bile salt plates were prepared by adding 144

0.5% (w/v) sodium salts of taurocholate (TC), taurodeoxycholate (TDC), glycocholate 145

(GC) and glycodeoxycholate (GDC) (Sigma, Germany) to MRS agar. All selected 146

Page 7: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

7

isolates were grown in MRS broth for 18 h. The liquid cultures of bacteria strains (10 147

µl) were spotted on agar plates and incubated at 37ºC for 72 h in anaerobic condition. 148

The presence of precipitated bile acid around colonies (opaque halo) was considered as 149

positive result. 150

2.1.6 Identification of LAB 151

Selected isolates with probiotic potential were identified by 16s rDNA 152

sequencing method as described by Chen et al. (2008). Briefly, LAB were cultured for 153

12 h in 1.5 ml MRS broth at 37°C and cells were collected by centrifugation at 5000 154

rpm for 3 min at 4°C. MRS broth was removed from the tube and genomic DNA was 155

extracted from the cell. The DNA extracted was amplified by forward Primer 28 F and 156

reverse primer 519 R. The amplification was done in 50 μl reaction volumes. Each PCR 157

reaction consisted of 11 μl water, 5 μl 28F (10 pmole), 5 μl 519R (10 pmole), 25 μl 158

master mix (Econo Taq®PlusGreen, Lucigen) and 4 μl DNA sample. The thermal 159

cycling included an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of a 160

denaturation step at 95°C for 30 s, an annealing step at 52°C for 1 min, an extension 161

step at 72°C for 1 min; and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. PCR products were 162

purified and then submitted to sequence. The sequence identities were determined by 163

BLAST program with the GenBank database. 164

2.2 Encapsulation of probiotic bacteria 165

2.2.1 Preparation of probiotic LAB for encapsulation 166

Selected probiotic LAB was subcultured twice in MRS broth. Cells were 167

harvested by centrifugation at 8500 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. Cell pellets were washed 168

twice with 0.85% NaCl and were finally re-suspended in 5 ml UHT milk with initial 169

Page 8: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

8

load of approximately 9-10 log cfu/ml, and the initial population of probiotic were 170

counted by pour plate in MRS agar containing 0.5% CaCO3. 171

2.2.2 Encapsulation procedure 172

All glassware and solutions used in the protocols were controlled in an aseptic 173

condition. Alginate beads were produced using a modified encapsulation method 174

originally reported by Homayouni et al. (2008). 1, 2 and 3% alginate (Fluka, USA) 175

mixture in distilled water containing 2% Hi-maize resistant starch (Merck, Germany) 176

and probiotic culture were prepared. Each mixture was added into 200 ml of soybean oil 177

(Morakot, Thailand) containing 0.2% lecithin (MEGA Lifesciences Ltd., Australia). 178

The mixture was stirred vigorously at 400 rpm for 20 min until it was fully emulsified. 179

Then 200 ml of 0.1 M calcium chloride solution were added. The mixture was allowed 180

to stand for 30 min to separate the prepared calcium-alginate beads in the bottom of 181

beaker as in calcium chloride layer. The oil layer was drained and beads were collected 182

in calcium chloride solution which then washed with 0.9% NaCl containing 5% glycerol 183

and stored at 4°C. 184

2.2.3 Alginate bead morphology 185

The shape of alginate beads was examined according to the method of 186

Allan-Wojtas et al. (2008). Samples were chemically stabilized by immerse fixation in 187

0.1 M PBS pH 5.0 containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4ºC for 4 h then dehydrated 188

through an ethanol series as follows: 50% (1×15 min), 70% (1×15 min), 90% (1×15 189

min) and 100% (3×15 min). The alginate bead was then dried in a critical point drier 190

(Quorum Technologies Ltd, UK.). Dried samples were mounted on aluminium supports 191

using silver cement, sputter coated with gold/ palladium using a Hummer VII sputter 192

coater (Anatech Ltd., USA) and observed in a FEI Quanta 400 SEM (FEI Company, 193

Page 9: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

9

USA) operated at 20 kV at ambient temperature. Images were captured on Polaroid 194

Type 55 positive/ negative film (Polaroid Corporation, USA). 195

2.2.4 Determination of encapsulation efficiency 196

Alginate beads (1 g) were added to 9 ml of PBS pH 7.2 and then incubated at 197

37ºC for 2 h. 1 ml of homogenized samples was removed, diluted to appropriate 198

concentrations and pour plated on MRS agar containing 0.5% CaCO3. The 199

encapsulation efficiency (EE) was calculated by the following expression: 200

EE (%) = (Xt / Xi) ×100. 201

Where Xt is the total amount of probiotic loaded in alginate beads and Xi 202

represents the initial amount of probiotic added in the preparation process. 203

2.2.5 Simulated GIT condition tolerance 204

Alginate beads (1 g) were placed in a sterile tube and assayed using method 205

described in section 2.1.2. 206

2.2.6 Release of encapsulated cells 207

Alginate beads (1g) were transferred into 9 ml PBS pH 7.2, mixed gently and 208

then incubated at 37ºC for 6 h. Samples were kept after exposed to PBS pH 7.2 at 0, 1, 209

2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 h (Sheu and Marshall, 1993). Released bacteria were counted using pour 210

plate technique in MRS agar containing 0.5% CaCO3. The index of cell release was 211

calculated by the following expression: 212

Cell release (%)

213

Statistical analysis 214

All experiments and analyses were run in triplicates. Data were recorded as 215

mean±standard deviation (S.D.) and were subjected to one-way analysis of variance 216

(ANOVA). Multiple comparisons were performed by Duncan's test. Statistical 217

Page 10: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

10

significance was set at P < 0.05. All analyses were performed using SPSS (SPSS Inc, 218

USA). 219

220

3. Result and discussion 221

3.1 Screening of LAB with probiotic potential 222

3.1.1 Isolation of LAB 223

To isolate LAB, bacteria which showed clear zone on MRS agar containing 224

CaCO3 were collected. Three hundred isolated bacteria obtain from the different sources 225

were then identified on the basis of Gram-staining morphology and catalase test. The 226

isolates with Gram-positive and catalase-negative were collected. Table 1 shows the 227

morphological classification of isolated LAB. These 150 isolates were classified into 228

two groups based on cell morphology, including 76 cocci and 74 rod isolates. 229

3.1.2 Simulated GIT condition tolerance 230

In order to act as probiotic in the GIT and to exert their beneficial effect on the 231

host, the bacteria must be able to survive the acidic conditions in the stomach and resist 232

bile acids at the beginning of the small intestine. Approximately 2.5 l of gastric juice 233

and 1 l of bile are secreted into the human digestive tract every day. Thus, it is essential 234

for the bacteria to have protection systems to withstand the low pH in the stomach, 235

digestive enzymes and bile in the small intestine (Argyri et al., 2012). Table 2 shows 236

the survival of selected LAB isolates under simulated gastric juice condition and further 237

simulated small intestinal condition. Among 150 LAB isolates, only 9 isolates were able 238

to survive more than 50% in simulated GIT condition. These 9 isolates were composed 239

of 7 rods and 2 cocci bacteria. Argyri et al. (2012) reported the majority of L. plantarum 240

and L. pentosus strains showed high resistance to low pH. 241

Page 11: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

11

3.1.3 Adhesion to hydrophobic solvent 242

Hydrophobicity has been considered as one of the main physical interactions 243

during bacterial adhesion to epithelial cells. The hydrophobicity of a bacterial surface 244

can been determined by direct methods, such as measuring the contact angle and 245

indirect method such as the microbial adhesion to n-hexadecane (MATH) assay, which 246

was used in this work. 247

MATH assay was employed to evaluate the hydrophobic character of the 248

bacterial cell surface as shows in Figure 1. CM21, a rod-shape LAB, showed the highest 249

hydrophobicity among other strains. However, it can be observed that adhesion to n-250

hexadecane of all isolates was lower than 50%. 251

The adhesion ability of LAB has been linked with their surface properties, which 252

in turn is reflected by the composition, structure and organization of the cell wall. The 253

Gram-positive cell wall of lactobacilli consists of a thick peptidoglycan layer, which is 254

decorated with various surface components, including (lipo-)teichoic acids, 255

polysaccharides, covalently bound proteins and S-layer proteins. Several studies have 256

shown that these components are likely to contribute to the surface properties of a 257

bacterium (Deepika et al., 2009). 258

3.1.4 Antimicrobial activity 259

The bacteria used as indicators in this study included Gram-positive bacteria (S. 260

aureus and L. monocytogenes) and Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli and S. 261

Typhimurium). Only 3 isolates, CM21, CM47 and CM53 showed inhibition effect 262

against all phothogenic bacteria (Table 3). Among them, CM53 showed the highest 263

inhibitory effect against all pathogenic bacteria. Maldonado et al. (2012) reported that 264

natural inhibitor substances of LAB can be organic acids, hydrogen peroxide or 265

Page 12: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

12

bacteriocin. The lactic acid produced by LAB and the low pH is inhibitory to 266

susceptible microorganisms such as Enterobacteriaceae. The results indicated that LAB 267

isolates may inhibited the pathogens mainly by production of lactic acid. 268

3.1.5 BSH activity 269

BSH is an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of conjugated bile salts resulting 270

in free bile acid and amino acid. The white precipitates around colonies and the clearing 271

of the medium are indicative of BSH activity. Moreover, BSH activity has been 272

reported to correlate with cholesterol lowering. 273

Out of the 3 selected LAB isolates, based on antimicrobial activity against all 274

pathogens, two isolates (CM21 and CM53) displayed the precipitation zones on GC and 275

GDC agar plate as shows in Table 4. Dashkevicz and Feighner (1989) reported that L. 276

plantarum showed the BSH activity on GDC-MRS agar after incubated anaerobically 277

for 48 h. 278

3.1.6 Identification of LAB 279

In this work, 3 LAB isolates (CM21, CM47 and CM 53) presented probiotic 280

properties and showed antimicrobial activity against all tested bacteria. Thus they were 281

selected to identify by 16s rDNA sequencing and were determined by BLAST 282

comparison of the obtained sequences with the nucleotide database in the GenBank 283

database. 16S rDNA sequences of CM21, CM47 and CM53 identified as the species in 284

the Genus Lactobacillus with the similarity between CM21, CM47 and CM53 and L. 285

plantarum subsp. plantarum ATCC 14917T

of 99.17, 99.79 and 98.91%, respectively. In 286

addition, CM21, CM47 and CM53 showed most closely related to L. pentosus JCM 287

1558T, L. plantarum subsp. argentoratensis DKO 22

T and L. paraplantarum DSM 288

Page 13: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

13

10667T, L. fabifermentans DSM 21115

T and L. xiangfangensis 3.1.1

T with similarity 289

higher than 97% as shown in Figure 2. 290

In this study, L. plantarum CM53 which showed the greater antimicrobial effect 291

than CM21 and CM47 was selected for study the effect of encapsulation on survival in 292

simulated GIT condition. 293

3.2 Encapsulation of probiotic bacteria 294

3.2.1 Size, morphology and encapsulation efficiency of alginate bead 295

In this study, L. plantarum CM53 was selected for encapsulated by emulsion 296

technique. A small volume of the cell CM53-alginate suspension (discontinuous phase) 297

is added to a large volume of a soy bean oil (continuous phase). The mixture is 298

homogenized to form a water-in-oil emulsion. Once the water-in-oil emulsion is 299

formed, the water soluble polymer must be insolubilized (cross-linked) to form tiny gel 300

particles within the oil phase. The mean diameters of beads were measured, calculated 301

and presented in Table 5. The diameter of 1% alginate beads containing L. plantarum 302

CM53 was none determined by microscopy. While, mean diameter of 2 and 3% alginate 303

beads were determined and showed the different average diameters between the ranged 304

of 65-127 µm and 146-228 µm, respectively. The size and spherical of the bead depend 305

mainly on the viscosity of the sodium alginate solution, calcium chloride collecting 306

solution and speed of agitation (Krasaekoopt et al., 2004). Moreover, EEs for viable cell 307

of L. plantarum CM53 at 1-3% alginate were not significantly different (P > 0.05) 308

(Table 5). 309

SEM micrograph of the alginate bead containing L. plantarum CM53 showed 310

the spherical shape and the exterior surface of the bead was covered with a network of 311

small cracks and fissures (Figure 3A). The Figure 2D showed the internal structure of 312

Page 14: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

14

alginate bead. The bacteria were distributed randomly in the alginates matrix (Figure 313

3C) while the Figure 3D indicated that matrix alginate entrapped L. plantarum CM53. 314

3.2.2 Survival of free and encapsulated L. plantarum CM53 in simulated 315

GIT condition 316

Encapsulation in alginate containing 2% Hi-maize resistant starch bead improve 317

the survival of L. plantarum CM53 in simulated GIT significantly (P < 0.05) (Figure 4). 318

The addition of Hi-maize resistant starch at 2% concentration in the encapsulation 319

procedure was to provide prebiotic to the encapsulated probiotic bacteria (Sultana et al., 320

2000). Cell survival after exposure to stomach gastric juice (SGJ) for 3 h was 92.97, 321

89.55, 77.55, and 69.82% of the initial population found in alginate beads produced by 322

3%, 2% and 1% alginate and free cells, respectively. Overall, the sequential exposure to 323

SGJ (3 h) followed by simulated small intestine (4 h) resulted in significantly (P<0.05) 324

higher number of L. plantarum CM53 surviving in the 2 and 3% alginate bead than 325

were obtained for cells entrapped in 1% alginate bead and free cell. The cell survival 326

after exposure to simulated small intestine for 4 h was 91.18, 89.09, 74.30 and 69.09% 327

of the initial population found in alginate beads produced by 3, 2 and 1% alginate and 328

free cells, respectively. After the initial losses, the populations of L. plantarum CM53 329

declined at the same rate for all treatments at the 7 h incubation period with final 330

decreases of 2.96 log cfu/g for free cells and 0.70, 0.87 and 2 log cfu/g for 3, 2 and 1% 331

alginate beads, respectively. The survival rate of L. plantarum CM53 in GIT was 332

influenced by the concentration of alginate. Guérin et al. (2003) also found that an 333

initial immobilized Bifidobacteria bifidum population of 10 log cfu/g in mixed alginate, 334

pectin and whey protein matrix could reach the small intestine in numbers of 7.5 log 335

cfu/g and hence provide the host with a beneficial health effect. 336

Page 15: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

15

3.2.3 Release of encapsulated cells 337

While the ionotropic alginate gel formed by Ca2+

cross linking of carboxylate 338

groups is insoluble in low pH, exposure to neutral pH or higher solubilises the alginate 339

(Annan et al., 2008). In our study, this pH-dependent behavior of the biopolymer was 340

used to control the degradation of alginate bead and release of the microencapsulated 341

cell load under the natural conditions found in the small intestine. The ability to release 342

of L. plantarum CM53 from alginate beads in PBS pH 7.2 at the beginning of 343

incubation (0 h) was 48.15±0.06, 45.70±0.85 and 45.25±1.90% for 1, 2 and 3% alginate 344

beads, respectively as shown in Figure 5. When incubation time increased the release of 345

cells was increased. Ability to release L. plantarum CM53 after exposure to PBS pH 7.2 346

for 2 h were 97.00, 90.25 and 87.81% of the initial population found in alginate beads 347

produced by 1, 2 and 3% alginate, respectively. At 5-6 h of incubation, there were no 348

significant change (P > 0.05) indicating no effect of alginate concentrations on the 349

release of cells from microcapsules after 4 h. An efficient release of viable and 350

metabolically active cells in the intestine is one of the aims of microencapsulation 351

(Mandal et al., 2006). 352

353

4. Conclusion 354

In conclusion, the results of this study showed that 3 strains of L. plantarum 355

(CM21, CM47 and CM53), were found to possess desirable in vitro probiotic 356

properties. These strains are good candidates for further investigation with in vivo 357

studies to elucidate their potential health benefits as well as in fermentation studies to 358

assess their technological characteristics for application as novel probiotic starters. 359

Page 16: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

16

Encapsulation of L. plantarum CM53 with alginate provided significant 360

protection for viable cell from harsh acidic condition of simulated GIT condition. As a 361

result, significantly higher number of bacteria survived sequential incubation from the 362

simulated gastric juice into the simulated small intestine where in accordance with the 363

soluble of alginate beads in an appropriate condition. 364

365

Acknowledgements 366

This work was supported by the Higher Education Research Promotion and the 367

National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education 368

Commission, the TRF senior research scholar program and the Graduate School, Prince 369

of Songkla University. 370

371

References 372

Allan-Wojtas, P., Hansen, L.T. and Paulson A.T. 2008. Microstructural studies of 373

probiotic bacteria-loaded alginate microcapsules using standard electron 374

microscopy techniques and anhydrous fixation. LWT-Food Science and 375

Technology. 41, 101-108. 376

Annan, N.T., Borza, A.D. and Hansen, L.T. 2008. Encapsulation in alginate-coated 377

gelatin microspheres improves survival of the probiotic Bifidobacterium 378

adolescentis 15703T during exposure to simulated gastro-intestinal condition. 379

Food Research International. 41, 184-193. 380

Argyri, A.A., Zoumpopoulou, G., Karatzas, K.A.G., Tsakalidou, E., Nychas, G.J.E., 381

Panagou, E.Z. and Tassou, C.C. 2012. Selection of potential probiotic lactic acid 382

Page 17: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

17

bacteria from fermented olives by in vitro tests. Food Microbiology. doi: 383

10.1016/j.fm.2012.10.005. 384

Petsuriyawong, B. and Khunajakr, N. 2011. Screening of probiotic lactic acid bacteria 385

from piglet feces. Kasetsart Journal. 45, 245-253. 386

Buntin, N., Chanthachum, S. and Hongpattarakere, T. 2008. Screening of lactic acid 387

bacteria from gastrointestinal tracts of marine fish for their potential use as 388

probiotics. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology. 30(1), 141-148 389

Capela, P., Hay, T.K.C and Shah, N.P. 2007. Effect of homogenisation on bead size and 390

survival of encapsulated probiotic bacteria. Food Research International. 40, 391

1261–1269. 392

Chen, H.C., Wang, S.Y. and Chen, M.J. 2008. Microbiological study of lactic acid 393

bacteria in kefir grains by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. 394

Food Microbiology. 25, 492–501. 395

Cook, M.T., Tzortzis, G., Charalampopoulos, D. and Khutoryanskiy, V.V. 2012. 396

Microencapsulation of probioticsfor gastrointestinal delivery. Journal of 397

Controlled Release. 162, 56-67. 398

Dashkevicz, M.P. and Feighner, S.D., 1989. Development of a differential medium for 399

bile salt hydrolase-active Lactobacillus spp. Applied and Environmental 400

Microbiology. 55, 11–16. 401

Deepika, G., Green, R.J., Frazier, R.A. and Charalampopoulos, D. 2009. Effect of 402

growth time on the surface and adhesion properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus 403

GG. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 107, 1230-12340. 404

Page 18: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

18

Guérin, D., Vuillemard, J.C. and Subirade, M. 2003. Protection of bifidobacteria 405

encapsulated in polysaccharide-protein gel beads against gastric juice and bile. 406

Journal of Food Protection. 66, 2076-2084. 407

Homayouni, A., Azizi, A., Ehsami, M.R., Yarmand, M.S. and Razavi, S.H. 2008. Effect 408

of microencapsulation and resistant starch on the probiotic survival and sensory 409

properties of synbiotic ice cream. Food Chemistry. 11, 50-55 410

Krasaekoopt, W., Bhandari, B. and Deeth, B.H. 2004. The influence of coating 411

materials on some properties of alginate beads and survivability of 412

microencapsulated probiotic bacteria. International Dairy Journal. 14, 737-743. 413

Maldonado, N.C., de Ruiz, C.S., Otero, M.C., Sesma, F. and Nader-Maćias, M.E. 2012. 414

Lactic acid bacteria isolated from young calves-Characterization and potential as 415

probiotics. Research in Veterinary Science. 92, 342-349. 416

Mandal, S., Puniya, A.K. and Singh, K. 2006. Effect of alginate concentrations on 417

survival of microencapsulated Lactobacillus casei NCDC-298. International 418

Dairy Journal. 16, 1190–1195. 419

Ocaña, V.S., Bru, E., de Ruiz Holgado, A.P. and Nader-Macias, M.E. 1999. Surface 420

characteristics of lactobacilli isolated from human vagina. Journal of General 421

and Applied Microbiology. 45, 203-212. 422

Poncelet, D., Lencki, R., Beaulieu, C., Halle, J.P., Neufeld, R.J., and Fournier, A. 1992. 423

Production of alginate beads by emulsification/internal gelation. Applied 424

Microbiology and Biotechnology. 38, 39–45. 425

Shah, N.P. and Ravula, R.R. 2000. Microencapsulation of probiotic bacteria and their 426

survival in frozen fermented dairy desserts. Australian Journal of Dairy 427

Technology. 55, 139–144. 428

Page 19: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

19

Sheu, T.Y. and Masshall, R.T. 1993. Microencapsulation of lactobacilli in calcium 429

alginate gel. Journal of Food Science. 54, 557-561. 430

Sultana, K. Godward, G., Reynolds, N., Arumugaswamy, R., Peiris, P. and 431

Kailasapathy, K. 2000. Encapsulation of probiotic bacteria with alginate-starch 432

and evaluation of survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions and in 433

yoghurt. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 62, 47-55. 434

Taranto, M. P., de Llano, D.G., Rodriguez, A., de Ruiz Holgado, A.P., and Font de 435

Valdez, G. 1996. Bile tolerance and cholesterol reduction by Enterococcus 436

faecium, a candidate microorganism for the use as a dietary adjunct in milk 437

products. Milchwissenschaft. 51, 383–385. 438

439

440

441

442

443

444

445

446

447

448

449

450

451

452

Page 20: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

20

Figure Legends 453

Figure 1. Cell surface hydrophobicity of selected lactic acid bacteria. The error bars 454

represent standard deviations. Different superscript indicate significant difference 455

(p<0.05). 456

Figure 2. Neighbor-joining tree comprising 16S rDNA sequences of CM21, CM53, 457

CM47 and related Lactobacillus species. Bootstap values (expressed as percentages of 458

1000 replications) greater than 60% are shown at the branch points. Bar, 0.01 459

substitution per nucleotide position. 460

Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy of calcium alginate beads. (a) Alginate bead 461

(b) Fractured microcapsules without bacteria (an air pocket in dark area is visible) (c) 462

Fractured microcapsule loaded with bacteria (d) Higher magnification view of 463

microencapsulated bacteria. Magnification is indicated individually on data bar at 464

bottom at the bottom of micrograph 465

Figure 4. Survival of free and encapsulated L. plantarum CM53 during exposure to 466

simulated gastrointestinal tract condition at 37ºC for 7 h. Symbols: ( ) free cells, 467

( ) 1% alginate, ( ) 2% alginate and ( ) 3% alginate. Survival (%) represents 468

the percentage of cell surviving relative to the initial population. Different superscript in 469

the same time indicate significant difference (p<0.05). 470

Figure 5. Release of L. plantarum CM53 from alginate microcapsules during exposure 471

to simulated small intestine juice at different time intervals (0–6 h). Symbols: ( ) 1% 472

alginate, ( ) 2% alginate and ( ) 3% alginate. Cell release (%) represents the 473

percentage of cell surviving relative to the initial population. Different superscript in the 474

same time indicate significant difference (p<0.05). 475

476

477

Page 21: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

21

Fig. 1 478

479

480

a

bc

ab

a

bc

d

bc bc

c

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

GM41 CM7 CM15 CM21 CM46 CM47 CM53 JJ4 KJ9

Hydro

phobic

ity (

%)

Isolate

Page 22: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

22

Fig. 2 481

482

483

Lactobacillus koreensis DCY50T (FJ904277)

Lactobacillus senmaizukei L13T (AB297927)

Lactobacillus odoratitofui YIT 11304T (AB365975)

Lactobacillus similis JCM 2765T (AB282889)

Lactobacillus paracollinoides DSM 15502T (AJ786665)

Lactobacillus siliginis M1-212T (DQ168027)

Lactobacillus rossiae DSM 15814T (AKZK01000036)

Lactobacillus rapi YIT 11204T (AB366389)

Lactobacillus diolivorans JKD6T (AF264701)

Lactobacillus senioris YIT 12364T (AB602570)

Lactobacillus lindneri DSM 20690T (X95421)

Pediococcus parvulus JCM 5889T (D88528)

Pediococcus inopinatus DSM 20285T (AJ271383)

Pediococcus ethanolidurans Z-9T (AY956789)

Pediococcus cellicola Z-8T (AY956788)

Pediococcus lolii NGRI 0510QT (AB362985)

Lactobacillus tucceti R 19cT (AJ576006)

Lactobacillus versmoldensis KCTC 3814T (BACR01000055)

Lactobacillus bobalius 203T (AY681134)

Lactobacillus kimchii MT-1077T (AF183558)

Lactobacillus alimentarius DSM 20249T (M58804)

Lactobacillus kimchiensis L133T (HQ906500)

Lactobacillus nantensis LP33T (AY690834)

Lactobacillus xiangfangensis 3.1.1T (HM443954)

Lactobacillus fabifermentans DSM 21115T (AM905388)

Lactobacillus paraplantarum DSM 10667T (AJ306297)

CM21

CM53

CM47

Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum ATCC 14917T (ACGZ01000098)

Lactobacillus pentosus JCM 1558T (D79211)

Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. argentoratensis DKO 22T (AJ640078)

98

98

97

87

100

99

82

78

60

100

61

87

99

99

75

99

100

69

64

89

62

61

0.005

Page 23: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

23

484

485

486

487

488

489

B A

C D

Fig. 3

Page 24: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

24

Fig. 4 490

491

492

493

d c

c b b a

a a

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Surv

ival

(%

)

Time (h)

Page 25: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

25

Fig. 5 494

495

Table Legends 496

Table 1. The morphological characteristic of isolated LAB 497

Table 2. Survival rate of selected LAB strains under simulated gastric juice conditions 498

at pH 2.0 for 3 h and further in simulated small intestinal tract condition at pH 8.0 for 4 499

h. 500

Table 3. The antimicrobial activity of selected LAB strains against food-borne 501

pathogenic bacteria 502

Table 4. The bile salt hydrolase activity of selected LAB strains 503

Table 5. Size and encapsulation efficiency of alginate bead at difference concentrate of 504

alginate 505

506

a

a a a a a

b

b b a

b

c b b

a

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Cel

l re

leas

e (%

)

Time (h)

Page 26: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

26

Table 1. The morphological characteristic of isolated LAB 507

Samples

Number of LAB strains

Cocci Rod Total strains

Cow milk 1 53 54

Goat milk 43 11 54

Pla-Som 16 2 18

Fermented Jing-Jang Fish 6 2 8

Kimji 10 6 16

Total strains 76 74 150

508

509

Page 27: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

27

Table 2. Survival rate of selected LAB strains under simulated gastric juice conditions 510

at pH 2.0 for 3 h and further in simulated small intestinal tract condition at pH 8.0 for 4 511

h. 512

Isolates

0 h

(log cfu/ml)

pH 2 for 3 h

(log cfu/ml)

Survival

(%)

pH 8 for 4 h

(log cfu/ml)

Survival

(%)

GF41 9.2 ± 0.7 6.1 ± 0.3 65.9 5.6 ± 0.2 60.1

CM7 8.9 ± 0.0 5.4 ± 0.1 61.0 4.5 ± 0.1 50.4

CM15 8.8 ± 0.1 5.3 ± 0.2 59.8 5.1 ± 0.2 58.3

CM21 9.6 ± 0.1 6.0 ± 0.1 62.7 5.9 ± 0.1 61.2

CM46 9.2 ± 0.9 6.1 ± 0.1 65.5 5.5 ± 0.3 59.3

CM47 8.6 ± 0.0 5.6 ± 0.4 64.8 5.2 ± 0.2 59.8

CM53 9.6 ± 0.1 5.8 ± 0.1 60.1 5.4 ± 0.3 55.9

JJ4 8.6 ± 0.1 5.8 ± 0.5 67.8 5.5 ± 0.1 64.7

KJ9 8.8 ± 0.0 5.4 ± 0.1 59.2 5.0 ± 0.0 56.9

Values are given as mean ± SD from triplicate determinations (n=3). 513

514

515

Page 28: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

28

Table 3. The antimicrobial activity of selected LAB strains against food-borne 516

pathogenic bacteria 517

Isolates

Radius of inhibition zone around colony (mm)

E. coli Sal. Typhimurium S. aureus L.

momocytogenes

GF41 5.7 ± 0.4b _ 2.46 ± 0.22

c _

CM7 4.1 ± 0.5b _ _ _

CM15 6.3 ± 1.2b _ 2.50 ± 0.49

c _

CM21 6.4 ± 0.9b 3.49 ± 0.44

b 5.23 ± 0.32

b 3.38 ± 0.88

a

CM46 5.2 ± 1.2b _ 2.42 ± 0.20

c 1.19 ± 0.30

c

CM47 8.6 ± 0.3b 5.44 ± 0.13

a 4.59 ± 0.72

b 3.56 ± 0.02

a

CM53 9.7 ± 0.8a 5.05 ± 0.02

a 7.61 ± 0.18

a 3.06 ± 0.02

ab

JJ4 4.3 ± 0.2b _ 2.32 ± 0.62

c _

KJ9 5.7 ± 1.0b _ 2.58 ± 0.11

c 2.11 ± 0.02

bc

Values are given as mean ± SD from triplicate determinations (n=3). 518

Different superscripts in the same column indicate significant difference (p<0.05). 519

520

Page 29: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

29

Table 4. The bile salt hydrolase activity of selected LAB strains 521

Isolates GC GDC TC TCD

CM21 + +

CM47 - +

CM53 + +

+ : the present of opaque halo around colonies, - : the absent of opaque halo around 522

colonies. 523

GC: glycocholate, GCD: glycodeoxycholate, TC: taurocholate and TCD: 524

taurodeoxycholate. 525

526

Page 30: Effect of encapsulation of selected probiotic cell on ...rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/Ar-Press/57-Apr/26.pdf · 84 The aim of this work was to screen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic

30

Table 5. Size and encapsulation efficiency of alginate bead at difference concentrate of 527

alginate 528

Treatments Alginate beads size (µm) Encapsulation efficiency (%)

1% Alginate - 81.10ns

2% Alginate 95.4 82.58 ns

3% Alginate 187.4 80.55 ns

ns No significant difference (p<0.05). 529

530

531