effect of adult life course blood pressure on cardiac structure in the mrc 1946 birth cohort
DESCRIPTION
Effect of adult life course blood pressure on cardiac structure in the MRC 1946 birth cohort British Hypertension Society 2011 Dr Arjun K Ghosh MRC Clinical Career Development Fellow and Specialty Registrar in Cardiology, International Centre for Circulatory Health, Imperial College, London. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Effect of adult life course blood pressure on cardiac structure in the MRC 1946 birth
cohort
British Hypertension Society 2011
Dr Arjun K Ghosh
MRC Clinical Career Development Fellow and Specialty Registrar in Cardiology, International Centre for Circulatory Health, Imperial College, London
MRC NSHD is the oldest British birth cohort study 5362 men and women born in one week in March 1946 >20 data collection time-points throughout life 1653 echocardiograms at most recent data collection
(age 60-64y) Life course approach to data analysis
Background
Life course approach
Hypothesis: exposures acting over the life course affect disease susceptibility
e.g. BP across the life course has an effect on subsequent left ventricular (LV) structure
The life course approach may offer better mechanistic understanding and allow earlier targeted interventions Mean SBP changes in 1946 cohort
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
30 50 70S
BP
(m
mH
g)
Age (years)
SBP Men SBP Women
To examine the effects of adult life course systolic blood pressure (SBP) on future LV structure (LV wall thickness and mass)
To determine if previous SBPs can add anything over and above current SBP as a predictor of future LV wall thickness and mass
To determine if rate of change in SBP or “cumulative burden” of SBP influences future LV structure
To investigate the effect of antihypertensive treatment over the life course on LV structure
Aim
Series of multivariable regression models fitted with cardiac outcome (all models adjusted for sex)
Sex by SBP interactions tested in order to investigate if associations differ in men and women
Order of modelling:i. SBP from each round fitted separatelyii. SBP from 2 rounds of data collectioniii. Treatment for hypertension included in addition to SBPiv. Examined whether change in SBP from 36y to current age or
“cumulative burden” of SBP [represented by Area Under the Curve (AUC) of SBP] predict current LV wall thickness and mass
Methods
Results – predictive value of previous SBP on LVMI
Regression coefficients (g/cm2 per mm HG), 95% confidence intervals and p values for 4 separate sex-adjusted models containing SBP at different ages
and current LV mass index (LVMI)
Variable b coefficient (95% CI ) p value
SBP (current) 0.20 (0.12 to 0.27) <0.001
SBP (age 53) 0.28 (0.21 to 0.35) <0.001
SBP (age 43) 0.13 (0.04 to 0.22) 0.007
SBP (age 36) 0.14 (0.04 to 0.24) 0.006
Results – predictive value of previous SBP over and above current SBP on LVMI
Regression coefficients (g/cm2 per mm HG), 95% confidence intervals, p values and adjusted r2 for predictors of LVMI in a sex-adjusted multivariable model
containing both current SBP and SBP at age 53
Variable b coefficient (95% CI ) p value r2
SBP (current) 0.08 (0.002 to 0.16) 0.0460.13
SBP (age 53) 0.25 (0.18 to 0.33) <0.001
Results – Effect of treatment on LVMI
Regression coefficients (g/cm2 treatment vs. no treatment), 95% confidence intervals and p values for 4 separate sex-adjusted models with treatment and
SBP at different ages and current LVMI
Variable b coefficient (95% CI ) p value
Current Rx 12.3 (9.2 to 15.4) <0.001Rx at age 53 10.0 (5.9 to 14.1) <0.001Rx at age 43 15.1 (5.8 to 24.3) 0.001Rx at age 36 - 0.6 (-14.7 to 13.6) 0.939
Rate of change vs. Area Under the Curve
AUC and slopes for two individuals – one with persistently elevated SBP, the other with gradually increasing SBP
36 43 53 63110115120125130135140145
Persistently elevated SBP Linear (Persistently elevated SBP) Gradually elevated SBP
Linear (Gradually elevated SBP)
Age (years)
SBP
(mm
Hg)
Results – Rate of change of SBP from age 36y to 53y on LVMI
Regression coefficients (g/cm2 per mm HG/ year; g/cm2 per mm HG) , 95% confidence intervals, p values and adjusted r2 for a sex-adjusted
model with change in SBP (36-53y), SBP at 36y , current SBP and current
LVMI
Variable b coefficient (95% CI ) p value r2
Rate of change in SBP from 36 to 53y
18.4 (11.7 to 25.1) <0.001
0.13
SBP at 36y 0.2 (-0.0 to
0.4) 0.12
Current SBP 0.1 (0.0 to
0.2) 0.02
36 43 53 63100
110
120
130
140
150
Age (years)SB
P (m
mHg
)
Two components in calculating the Area Under the Curve
SBP over the adult life course predicts future LV structure SBP at age 53 is a stronger predictor of LVMI than current SBP,
although both independently predict LVMI in a multivariable model
Rate of change in SBP from 36y to 53y may be an important determinant of future LV structure
Antihypertensive treatment from the age of 43 onwards is associated with elevated LVMI independent of SBP at the corresponding age, suggesting that treatment may fail to normalize LVMI
A chance to intervene missed?
Conclusions
My Supervisors, funders and mentor – Professor Alun Hughes, Dr Rebecca Hardy, Dr Darrel Francis, Professor Nishi Chaturvedi, Professor Di Kuh and Professor Jamil Mayet
Colleagues at MRC LHA
Colleagues at ICCH, Imperial College
Acknowledgements
Thank You
Mean BP 136/78 Mean BP in men 140/80, mean BP in women 133/76 Mean BP in those on antihypertensive treatment 139/79 Mean BP in those off antihypertensive treatment 135/77 Mean BMI 27.94, similar in men and women
BP and BMI characteristics
Age 36 – 51
Age 43 – 107
Age 53 – 438
Age 60-64 - 640
Number of people on antihypertensive treatment