educator evaluation overview
DESCRIPTION
Educator Evaluation Overview. Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability. Legislation . Michigan School Reform Law Districts are required to conduct annual educator evaluations that include student growth as a significant factor. Legislation . - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Educator Evaluation Overview
Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability
![Page 2: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Legislation Michigan School Reform LawDistricts are required to conduct annual educator evaluations that include student growth as a significant factor.
2
![Page 3: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Legislation State Fiscal Stabilization
Fund (SFSF)Districts are required to report the effectiveness label generated by these evaluations.
3
![Page 4: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
What are districts REQUIRED to do?Michigan School
Reform LawConduct annual educator evaluations. Include measures of student growth as a significant factor.
4
![Page 5: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Locally determine the details of the educator evaluations, the consequences, and the timeline for implementation.
5
What are districts REQUIRED to do?
![Page 6: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Tie educator effectiveness labels to decisions regarding promotion and retention of teachers and administrators, including tenure and certification decisions.
6
What are districts REQUIRED to do?
![Page 7: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Use a performance-based compensation method that evaluates performance based, at least in part, on student growth data.
7
What are districts REQUIRED to do?
![Page 8: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Growth data can include state-provided measures from assessment data AND locally determined measures.
8
What are districts REQUIRED to do?
![Page 9: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF)
Report an effectiveness label in the Registry of Educational Personnel (REP) during the end of year submission.
9
What are districts REQUIRED to do?
![Page 10: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
2011: Principals only (based on most recent evaluation)
2012: All educators (based on annual evaluations)
10
What are districts REQUIRED to do?
![Page 11: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
What are districts ENCOURAGED to do?
Use the Framework for Educator Evaluations as a model for educator evaluations.
11
![Page 12: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
What are districts ENCOURAGED to do?
Identify ways to measure student growth and progress toward proficiency using internal measures and local data.
12
![Page 13: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
What are districts ENCOURAGED to do?
Include data from multiple sources as measures of educator effectiveness whenever possible.
13
![Page 14: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
What are districts ENCOURAGED to do?
Collaborate to identify best practices for evaluation methods, metrics in currently non-assessed content areas and grades, and key data sources.
14
![Page 15: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
MDE is REQUIRED to: Link student data with teacher of
record beginning in 2010-11 (CEPI/MDE). Districts will report “teacher of
record” for each course a student takes; local decision.
15
![Page 16: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
MDE is REQUIRED to: Provide districts and schools
with measures of student growth on state-assessments in reading and mathematics for each teacher (regardless of subject taught).
16
![Page 17: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
MDE is REQUIRED to: Provide districts with measures
of student proficiency in writing, science and social studies, and reading and mathematics for each teacher (regardless of subject taught)
17
![Page 18: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
State-Provided MeasuresFor each educator, we will
generate:
Student growtho Readingo Math
18
![Page 19: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
State-Provided Measures Percentage of proficient
students o Readingo Matho Writingo Scienceo Social Science
19
![Page 20: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Growth Data Achievement “growth” can
be calculated only where a Grade 3-8 student has been tested in consecutive years (i.e. reading and Math).
20
![Page 21: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Growth Data
21
![Page 22: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
State-Provided Measures “Puzzle pieces” approach Districts choose which “pieces”
make sense in their local context.
Reports are generated for each educator, regardless of subject taught or type of position.
22
![Page 23: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
MDE is REQUIRED to: Report (with CEPI) the
proportion of educators rated as highly effective, effective, and ineffective (SFSF/ARRA)
23
![Page 24: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
MDE is REQUIRED to: Report (with CEPI) the
factors used in educator evaluations and the proportion of evaluations which include student growth as significant factor.
24
![Page 25: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Statewide Flow of Information: Educator Evaluations
Districts provide information on student courses and
teacher of record (Teacher Student Data
Link)
1
225
![Page 26: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Statewide Flow of Information: Educator Evaluations
MDE attaches assessment data (proficiency and
growth) from each student in each teacher’s courses to
that teacher and provides to districts
2
326
![Page 27: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Statewide Flow of Information: Educator Evaluations
Districts use assessment data, local measures of growth and other factors to conduct annual evaluations. The results of evaluations are reported back to the state.
4
3
27
![Page 28: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Statewide Flow of Information: Educator Evaluations
4
MDE provides aggregate reports to the federal
government on the percent of educators in each
effectiveness category
28
![Page 29: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Assessment Data Provided MDE will provide for each
teacher:Student growth
o Readingo Math
29
![Page 30: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Assessment Data Provided Percent of students proficiento Readingo Matho Writingo Scienceo Social Science
30
![Page 31: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Draft Data Provided to District for Use in Evaluations
31
![Page 32: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Aggregate Report by Teacher
ABC DistrictTeacher Name
Math Reading Writing Science Social Studies Sig Improve Improve Maintain Decline Sig DeclineSally Smith 55 85 70 46 92 20 30 20 20 10Tommy Thompson 35 25 45 45 60 10 20 20 30 20
Percent of Students Proficient Math Growth (% of students)
32
![Page 33: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Student Roster for Each Teacher
Teacher: Sally SmithStudent Name
Math Reading Writing Science Social Studies Math PLC Reading PLCJohnny Jones NI P P A NP Maintain DeclineCarol Crawford P A A P P Improve Sig ImproveTammy Fay PP P NI P PP Sig Decline Maintain
Student Proficiency Level Student Growth
33
![Page 34: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Final Step: Evaluations
Districts conduct annual evaluations that are: locally determined
34
![Page 35: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Effectiveness Labels in REP
Districts determine educators’ local ratings based on evaluations.
35
![Page 36: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Effectiveness Labels in REP Districts crosswalk local
ratings to: Framework for Educator
Evaluation labels OR SFSF Effectiveness
Labels
36
![Page 37: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Labels: Framework for Educator Evaluation
Framework for Educator Evaluation suggests four labels: Exceeds Goals Meets Goals Progressing Toward Goals Does Not Meet Goals
37
![Page 38: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Framework Labels SFSF Labels
Exceeds goals Highly effective
Meets goals ORProgressing toward goals
Effective
Does not meet goals Ineffective
![Page 39: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
MDE Support for Evaluations Guidance and evaluation
“toolbox” Inventory of current
practices Collaboration with external
stakeholders
39
![Page 40: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
MDE Support for Evaluations Referent groups focused on:
Evaluating non-assessed grades/ content areas.
Use in “value-added models.”
40
![Page 41: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Timeline End of year 2011:
Teacher Student Data Link Collection available in MSDS.
41
![Page 42: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Timeline End of year 2011 (continued):
Principal effectiveness ratings must be reported in REP.
Other administrators encouraged, but optional until 2012.
42
![Page 43: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Timeline Early fall 2011: MDE will provide districts with
measures for all educators based on data from the 2009-10 & 2010-11 school years.
43
![Page 44: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Timeline Fall 2011 – Spring 2012:
Districts conduct educator evaluations as locally bargained/determined.
44
![Page 45: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Timeline End of year 2012:
Districts report effectiveness ratings for all administrators and teachers.
45
![Page 46: Educator Evaluation Overview](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815f33550346895dce0170/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Contact Information
Carla Howe OlivaresEvaluation Research & AccountabilityOffice of Educational Assessment &
877-560-8378, choose option 6