educatealabama data report – assessed … alabama/practice level asu 2016 1_3_17...2.6 70 342 702...

11
ASU EDUCATEAlabama Data Report – Assessed Practice Level by ARIC Region: 2016 All Continua Specific indicator number selected from all 39 indicators within the Evaluatee Self Assessment based on the Continuum The Continuum is organized to describe five increasingly complex and sophisticated levels of development of practice listed on the left. The indicators at each level describe what an evaluatee should know and be able to do at that level. These indicators are cumulative and include those stated in previous levels. While the “Pre-Service/Beginning” and “Emerging” columns describe the skills and Emerging abilities that novice evaluatees aim to develop during their induction period, it is not assumed that beginning evaluatees will necessarily enter the profession at this level of practice for every standard indicator. The levels do not represent a chronological sequence in an evaluatee’s growth. Each describes a developmental level of performance. An evalutee may be at an “Emerging” or “Applying” level of practice for some indicators on the Continuum, and at an “Integrating” or “Innovating” level for other indicators, regardless of his/her years of experience. It is not uncommon for accomplished evaluatees to self-assess and find themselves at varying levels of practice in response to new Innovating contexts and challenges. Indicator Number Pre-Service/Beginning Emerging Applying Integrating Innovating Evaluatees self assess their level of teaching practice for each of the 39 indicators (1.1 - 5.5) by completing the Evaluatee Self Assessment which is based on the Alabama Continuum for Teacher Development. Content Knowledge (Indicators 1.1 -1.5 ), Continuum Teaching and Learning (Indicators 2.1 - 2.11), Continuum Literacy (Indicators 3.1 - 3.8), Continuum Diversity (Indicators 4.1 - 4.10), Continuum Professionalism (Indicators 5.1 - 5.5), Continuum Each of the 39 Indicators are listed individually for each teaching standard based on the Continuum. Number of Alabama evaluatees selecting the level of practice for each indicator listed in their Evaluatee Self Assessment reflecting the teaching standards based on the Continuum. 1.1 - 5.5 Indicators # Educators Selecting Please go to the Continuum to view complete descriptors of the five levels of evaluatee development and practice. Data-All Teaching Standards Teaching Standard 1 Teaching Standard 2 Teaching Standard 3 Teaching Standard 4 Teaching Standard 5 2016 EDUCATEAlabama Data Report Assessed Practice Level by Alabama Evaluatees Reporting Key 2016 - 2017 EDUCATEAlabama (EA) is Alabama’s online formative assessment process designed to provide information about an evaluatee’s current level of practice within the Alabama Continuums for Development, which is based on the Alabama Quality Teaching Standards (AQTS). The AQTS constitutes the foundation of the teaching profession while the Continuum is a tool used to guide educator reflection, self-assessment, and goal setting for professional learning and growth. For more information visit http://www.alex.state.al.us/leadership The following report provides statewide data based on Alabama public school evaluatees’ self assessment of their level of teaching practice based on their completion of the Evaluatee Self Assessment within the EA online process in: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:28 AM Page 1

Upload: dinhkiet

Post on 30-May-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

ASU

EDUCATEAlabama Data Report – Assessed Practice Level by ARIC Region: 2016

All Continua

Specific indicator number selected from all 39 indicators within the Evaluatee Self Assessment based on the Continuum

The Continuum is organized to describe five increasingly complex and sophisticated levels of development of practice listed on the left. The indicators at each level describe what an evaluatee should know and be able to do at that level. These indicators are cumulative and include those stated in previous levels. While the “Pre-Service/Beginning” and “Emerging” columns describe the skills and Emerging abilities that novice evaluatees aim to develop during their induction period, it is not assumed that beginning evaluatees will necessarily enter the profession at this level of practice for every standard indicator.

The levels do not represent a chronological sequence in an evaluatee’s growth. Each describes a developmental level of performance. An evalutee may be at an “Emerging” or “Applying” level of practice for some indicators on the Continuum, and at an “Integrating” or “Innovating” level for other indicators, regardless of his/her years of experience. It is not uncommon for accomplished evaluatees to self-assess and find themselves at varying levels of practice in response to new Innovating contexts and challenges.

Indicator Number

Pre-Service/Beginning

Emerging

Applying

Integrating

Innovating

Evaluatees self assess their level of teaching practice for each of the 39 indicators (1.1 - 5.5) by completing the Evaluatee Self Assessment which is based on the Alabama Continuum for Teacher Development.

Content Knowledge (Indicators 1.1 -1.5 ), Continuum

Teaching and Learning (Indicators 2.1 - 2.11), Continuum

Literacy (Indicators 3.1 - 3.8), Continuum

Diversity (Indicators 4.1 - 4.10), Continuum

Professionalism (Indicators 5.1 - 5.5), Continuum

Each of the 39 Indicators are listed individually for each teaching standard based on the Continuum.

Number of Alabama evaluatees selecting the level of practice for each indicator listed in their Evaluatee Self Assessment reflecting the teaching standards based on the Continuum.

1.1 - 5.5 Indicators

# Educators Selecting

Please go to the Continuum to view complete descriptors of the five levels of evaluatee development andpractice.

Data-All Teaching Standards

Teaching Standard 1

Teaching Standard 2

Teaching Standard 3

Teaching Standard 4

Teaching Standard 5

2016

EDUCATEAlabama Data ReportAssessed Practice Level by Alabama Evaluatees

Reporting Key

2016 - 2017

EDUCATEAlabama (EA) is Alabama’s online formative assessment process designed to provide information about an evaluatee’s current level of practice within the Alabama Continuums for Development, which is based on the Alabama Quality Teaching Standards (AQTS). The AQTS

constitutes the foundation of the teaching profession while the Continuum is a tool used to guide educator reflection, self-assessment, and goal setting for professional learning and growth.

For more information visit http://www.alex.state.al.us/leadershipThe following report provides statewide data based on Alabama public school evaluatees’ self assessment of their level of teaching practice

based on their completion of the Evaluatee Self Assessment within the EA online process in:

Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:28 AM Page 1

ASU

EDUCATEAlabama Data Report – Assessed Practice Level by ARIC Region: 2016

All Continua

Assessed Practice Level by Alabama EducatorsNumber of Educators Selecting the Level of Practice for Each Indicator

InnovatingIntegratingApplyingEmergingBeginningIndicator Number

63599574225431.1

73484656231561.2

96462600288521.3

62627552200541.4

84467681209541.5

78479640251452.1

110593614146302.2

80534637200412.3

53392679316552.4

462767243411072.5

48328702342702.6

51250779326822.7

34384684324622.8

55312711336752.9

62459594300742.10

373786123561062.11

69465600287633.1

75325779246593.2

43466569333723.3

313246583671043.4

212646014151833.5

653495363511833.6

672476833621233.7

442326404421243.8

322906474061084.1

392987352961134.2

40275721375694.3

411465434782724.4

451204984943234.5

312645723782354.6

52304680355894.7

64361678290894.8

342986174101214.9

52318630388924.10

413066303771245.1

Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:28 AM Page 2

ASU

EDUCATEAlabama Data Report – Assessed Practice Level by ARIC Region: 2016

All Continua

58326640360975.2

372276993801395.3

90581559193575.4

126419714159625.5

Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:28 AM Page 3

ASU

EDUCATEAlabama Data Report – Assessed Practice Level by ARIC Region: 2016

All Continua

Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:28 AM Page 4

ASU

EDUCATEAlabama Data Report – Assessed Practice Level by ARIC Region: 2016

All Continua

Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:28 AM Page 5

ASU

EDUCATEAlabama Data Report – Assessed Practice Level by ARIC Region: 2016

All Continua

Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:28 AM Page 6

ASU

EDUCATEAlabama Data Report – Assessed Practice Level by ARIC Region: 2016

All Continua

Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:28 AM Page 7

ASU

EDUCATEAlabama Data Report – Assessed Practice Level by ARIC Region: 2016

All Continua

Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:28 AM Page 8

ASU

EDUCATEAlabama Data Report – Assessed Practice Level by ARIC Region: 2016

All Continua

Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:28 AM Page 9

ASU

EDUCATEAlabama Data Report – Assessed Practice Level by ARIC Region: 2016

All Continua

Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:28 AM Page 10

ASU

EDUCATEAlabama Data Report – Assessed Practice Level by ARIC Region: 2016

All Continua

Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:28 AM Page 11