economic growth lviv, september 2012. growth in finland
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ECONOMIC GROWTH
Lviv, September 2012
![Page 2: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
BKT
%-muutos edellisestä vuodesta
Lähde: Tilastokeskus.
Kokonaistuotannon reaalikasvu
Growth in Finland
![Page 3: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10
Mean of EU15USA
![Page 4: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
AT BE DE FI FR GE GR IR IT LU NL PT SP SW UK 0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
60-12
90-12
![Page 5: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
-12
-8
-4
0
4
8
12
16
65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10
(mini,max)
![Page 6: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8
mean growth rate
SD o
f gro
wth
rate
s
![Page 7: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Sources of Economic Growth
Production functionY = AF(K, N)
Decompose into growth rate form: the growth accounting equation
DY/Y = DA/A + aK DK/K + aN DN/N The a terms are the elasticities of output with
respect to the inputs (capital and labor)
![Page 8: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Sources of Economic Growth
Interpretation A rise of 10% in A raises output by 10% A rise of 10% in K raises output by aK times 10%
A rise of 10% in N raises output by aN times 10%
Both aK and aN are less than 1 due to diminishing marginal
productivity
![Page 9: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Sources of Economic Growth
Growth accounting Four steps in breaking output growth into its causes (productivity
growth, capital input growth, labor input growth)1. Get data on DY/Y, DK/K, and DN/N, adjusting for quality changes
2. Estimate aK and aN from historical data
3. Calculate the contributions of K and N as aK DK/K and aN DN/N,
respectively
4. Calculate productivity growth as the residual: DA/A = DY/Y – aK
DK/K – aN DN/N
![Page 10: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The Sources of Economic Growth
Growth accounting and the productivity slowdown Denison’s results for 1929–1982
Entire period output growth 2.92%; due to labor 1.34%; due to capital 0.56%; due to productivity 1.02%
Pre-1948 capital growth was much slower than post-1948
Post-1973 labor growth slightly slower than pre-1973
![Page 11: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Sources of Economic Growth in the United States (Denison) (Percent per
Year)
![Page 12: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Productivity Levels, 1947-2005
![Page 13: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Productivity
)(N
N
K
Ka
A
A
N
N
Y
YK
)(
N
N
K
Ka
A
A
N
N
Y
YK
Labor TFP Growth rateProductivity of K/N
Labor productivity growth may exceed TFP growth because of faster growth of capital relative to growth of labor
![Page 14: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Technological Progress in the Solow Model
A new variable: E = labor efficiency Assume: Technological progress is labor-
augmenting: it increases labor efficiency at the exogenous rate g = ∆E/E:
We now write the production function as: Y = F(K,L*E)
where L*E is the number of effective workers. Increases in efficiency will have the same effect on
output as increases in the labor force.
![Page 16: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The Solow Model
Basic assumptions and variables Population and work force grow at same rate n Economy is closed and for now there is no govt. (G = 0)
Ct = Yt – It
Rewrite everything in per-worker terms:
(kt is also called the capital-labor ratio)
Therefore, saving and investment per effective worker is:
sy=sf(k)
y t Yt /L tE t = output per effective worker
kt K t /L tE t = capital per effective worker
c t Ct /Lt consumption per worker
![Page 17: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The Solow Model
The per-worker production functionyt = f(kt)
Assume no productivity growth for now (we will add it later) Plot of per-worker production function Same shape as aggregate production function
![Page 18: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The per-worker production function
![Page 19: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The Solow Model
Steady states Steady state: yt, ct, and kt are constant over time
Gross investment must Replace worn out capital, δKt
Expand so the capital stock grows as the economy grows, nKt
Provide capital for the new “effective” workers created by technological progress,
It = (δ+n+g)Kt
If so, then ( + n + g)k = break-even investment: the amount of investment necessary to keep k constant.
gK t
![Page 20: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The Solow Model
Ct = Yt – It = Yt – (δ+n+g)Kt
In per-worker terms, in steady state
c = f(k)-(δ+n+g)kt
Plot of c, f(k), and (δ+n+g)kt
![Page 21: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
The relationship of consumption per worker to the capital–labor ratio in the steady state
![Page 22: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
The Solow Model
Increasing k will increase c up to a point This is kG in the figure, the Golden Rule capital-labor ratio
For k beyond this point, c will decline But we assume henceforth that k is less than kG, so c always rises
as k rises
![Page 23: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The Solow Model
Reaching the steady state Suppose saving is proportional to current income:
St = sYt,
where s is the saving rate, which is between 0 and 1 Equating saving to investment gives
sYt = (n + d + g)Kt
![Page 24: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The Solow Model
Putting this in per-worker terms gives
sf(k) = (n + δ + g)k Plot of sf(k) and (n + δ + g)k
![Page 25: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Determining the capital–labor ratio in the steady state
![Page 26: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
The steady state
The only possible steady-state capital-labor ratio is k* Output at that point is y* = f(k*);
consumption is c* = f(k*) – (n + d + g)k* If k begins at some level other than k*, it will move toward k*
For k below k*, saving > the amount of investment needed to keep k constant, so k rises
For k above k*, saving < the amount of investment needed to keep k constant, so k falls
![Page 27: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Long-run growth
To summarize: With no productivity growth, the economy reaches a steady state, with constant capital-labor ratio, output per worker, and consumption per worker.
Therefore, the fundamental determinants of long-run living standards are:
1. The saving rate2. Population growth3. Productivity growth
![Page 28: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The fundamental determinants of long-run living standards: the saving rate Higher saving rate means higher capital-labor
ratio, higher output per worker, and higher consumption per worker
![Page 29: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The fundamental determinants of long-run living standards: population growth
Higher population growth means a lower capital-labor ratio, lower output per worker, and lower consumption per worker
![Page 30: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Fundamental Determinants of Long-run Living Standards: Productivity Growth
In equilibrium, productivity improvement increases the capital-labor ratio, output per worker, and consumption per worker: Productivity improvement directly improves the amount that can be produced at any capital-labor ratio and the increase in output per worker increases the supply of saving, causing the long-run capital-labor ratio to rise
![Page 31: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Repetito
![Page 32: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Growth Empirics: Balanced growth
Solow model’s steady state exhibits balanced growth - many variables grow at the same rate. Solow model predicts Y/L and K/L grow at the same
rate (g), so K/Y should be constant. This is true in the real world.
Solow model predicts real wage grows at same rate as Y/L, while real rental price is constant. Also true in the real world.
![Page 33: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Growth Empirics: Convergence Solow model predicts that, other things equal,
“poor” countries (with lower Y/L and K/L) should grow faster than “rich” ones.
If true, then the income gap between rich & poor countries would shrink over time, causing living standards to “converge.”
This does not always occur because “other things” aren’t equal. In samples of countries with similar savings &
pop. growth rates, income gaps shrink about 2% per year.
In larger samples, after controlling for differences in saving, pop. growth, and human capital, incomes converge about 2% per year.
![Page 34: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Factor Accumulation vs. Production Efficiency
Differences in income per capita among countries can be due to differences in:1. capital – physical or human – per worker
2. the efficiency of production (the height of the production function)
Empirical studies find that: Both factors are important. The two factors are correlated: countries
with higher physical or human capital per worker also tend to have higher production efficiency.
![Page 35: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Endogenous Growth Theory
Endogenous growth theory—explaining the sources of productivity growth Aggregate production function
Y = AK Constant Marginlal Product of Kapital
Human capital Knowledge, skills, and training of individuals Human capital tends to increase in the same
proportion as physical capital Research and development programs Increases in capital and output generate increased
technical knowledge, which offsets decline in MPK from having more capital
![Page 36: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Endogenous Growth Theory
Implications of endogenous growth Suppose saving is a constant fraction of output: S =
sAK Since investment = net investment + depreciation, I = DK + dK
Setting investment equal to saving implies:DK + dK = sAK
Rearrange:DK/K = sA – d
Since output is proportional to capital, DY/Y = DK/K, so
DY/Y = sA – d Thus the saving rate affects the long-run growth rate
(not true in Solow model)
![Page 37: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Endogenous (New) Growth Theory
Summary Endogenous growth theory attempts to explain,
rather than assume, the economy’s growth rate The growth rate depends on many things, such as
the saving rate, prerequisites for innovative activity, working of the financing industry, regulations (patent laws)
Most of those, can be affected by government policies
![Page 38: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
at
be
de
fi
fr
ge
gr
ir
it
nl
pt
sp
sw
uk
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Share of high-tech industries, %2007
![Page 39: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
![Page 40: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Actual vs forecast output
![Page 41: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
![Page 42: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Growth may accelerate also because substitution between labor and capital increases (the efficiency in production increases!)
![Page 43: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
![Page 44: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Economic Growth in China, the U.S., and Japan
![Page 45: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
The mathematics of the growth problem: Y=Y(K,L) The net investment is: K’ = I – δK = Y – C – δKLet the objective function to be: max ∫ U(C)e– βt dt
Here we first move to labor intensive forms so that y = Y/L and k = K/L, and c = C/L.
Thus, the net investment equation can be written in the form:
K´= knL + Lk’, where n is the growth rate of labor force. Hencek´= y – c – (n+δ)k = φ(k) – c – (n+δ)k
![Page 46: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Now the current value Hamiltonian can be expressed as: Ĥ = U(c) + μ(φ(k) – c – (n+δ)k)
Here u is the control and k the state. Now the necessary conditions are:
∂H/∂c = U´(c) – μ = 0μ´ = – ∂Ĥ/∂k + βμ = – μ(φ’(k) – (n+δ + β))and k´= φ(k) – c – (n+δ)k
and k(0) = k0 and lim(T→∞)λ(T) ≥ 0,
lim(T→∞) k(T) ≥ 0 and lim(T→∞) λ(T)k(T) = 0
![Page 47: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Now, using the first– order condition μ = U(c) we get by differentiating both sides μ´ = U”(c)c’so we can rewrite c’ = (U’/U”)( φ’(k) – (n+δ) – β)
U”/U’ is the so– called elasticity of marginal utility, to be denoted by η(c). Its inverse, η(c)– 1, in turn is called the instantaneous elasticity of substitution. Thus, c’/c = – (1/η(c))(φ’(k) – (n+δ) – r) which says that consumption growth is proportional to the difference between the net marginal produce of capital accounting for population growth and depreciation, and the rate of time preference.
![Page 48: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
k´= φ(k) – c – (n+δ)k is the so– called Keynes– Ramsey rule. In the steady state, k’ = 0, optimum consumption is given by: c* = φ’(k*) – (n+δ)k*
If we maximize c* with respect to k* we get the optimum consumption as:
φ’(k*) = (n+δ)
which is the golden rule. Now, we have the steady state, the difference equations give us the dynamic paths, then we have the draw the phase diagram and analyze the dynamics of k and c. As usual, in this kind of models, the solution has the saddle point property. Thus, there is only one (stable) trajectory which leads to the steady state.
![Page 49: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
dc/dt=0 dk/dt=0
k
steady state c
![Page 50: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Convergence
Do income differences decrease or increase (convergence or divergence)?
Solow model predicts that income levels decrease (poor countries catch up rich countries): marginal product of capital is larger
On top of that, poor countries may also benefit from adaptation of rich countries’ technology
Convergence may occur but depend (also) on other things (conditional convergence)
![Page 51: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
![Page 52: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
1 000
10 000
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Suomi Ruotsi Iso-Britannia USA
Geary-Khamis $, vuoden 1990 hintoihin (vuoteen 1997)
Lähteet: Suomen Pankki ja Tilastokeskus.
Bruttokansantuote asukasta kohtiGDP per capita in several countries
![Page 53: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
![Page 54: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
![Page 55: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
![Page 56: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
![Page 57: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Walt Rostow’sTake-offperiods
![Page 58: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Vernon’s product cycle
![Page 59: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
![Page 60: ECONOMIC GROWTH Lviv, September 2012. Growth in Finland](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022110210/56649e705503460f94b6e8ab/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)