econometrics case study
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
EconometricsBenjaminCroftIndividualProject
Fall2014
FertilityRatesAroundtheWorld:APilotStudyoftheRegressionof14EndogenousVariablestoLocal
FertilityRates
![Page 2: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
TableofContents
Introduction
LiteratureReview
ExplanationofVariables
RegressionEquation
StatisticalSignificance
JointSignificance
Heteroskedasticity
Limitations
Conclusion
WorksCited
![Page 3: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
INTRODUCTION Ofthecriticalglobalissuesofthe21stcentury,populationgrowthisperhapsamongthegreatest.Thefearsofhumanoverpopulationareaboundingastheworldpopulationclockticksupwardsof7.2trillionpeopleasofDecember2nd,2014.Anewbabyisbornevery8seconds,whileapersondiesatestimated12secondintervals,showingthatthebirthratesurpassesthedeathrateleadingtoanetgaininthehumanpopulationevery16seconds.Micro-statisticsareastonishingintheabstract;however,theeffectofpopulationgrowthpermeatesverytangibleglobalissuesaswell.Fromfamine,resourcewars,ethnicconflict,landuse,airpollution,transportation,infrastructure,militaries,energydependency,climatechange,incomeinequality,racism,sexism,andmore,populationisaunifyingthemebehindmanyoftheworld’scurrentcrises.
Populationisrisingquickly,raisingseveralimportantquestionsaboutsustainedhumanexistence.Whatispopulation’seffectonenergyconsumptionandoildependency?Howcanarapidlygrowinghumanpopulationbeenvironmentallysustainable?Whereareallthenewpeoplegoingtolive?Wherearetheresourcesgoingtocomefromtosupportagrowingpopulation?Whatisthecarryingcapacityoftheearth?Whatcangloballeadersdotocurbrunawaypopulationgrowth? Toanswerthesequestions,itisimperativetotakeastepbackandanalyzewhatcontributestopopulationchange,bothpositivelyandnegatively.Thisstudyattemptstoprovidesomeexplanatorypowerforfertilityrates–thatis,therateatwhichawomangivesbirthwithinacountry.Fertilityratesprovidecriticalinsightintopopulationchangeastheyexplainthegrowthanddeclineofpopulationovertime.Byanalyzingthepredictorsoffertilityrates,policymakerscanthenbuildmoreeffectivelawsandprogramstostemapossiblyunsustainablepopulationgrowth.Aroundtheworld,fertilityratesarespikinginsomeareaswhilestabilizinginothers.Usingdatacollectedfromeverycountryaroundtheworld,thisstudyseekstoexplainwhy.
![Page 4: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
LITERATUREREVIEW
Foraglobalissue,fertilityratestudiesrangewidelyfromprojectionmodels,impactassessments,andpredictionequations.Assuch,theliteraturerangeswidelyonitsfocus.Twostudiesstandoutasrelevanttothestudyconductedinthispaper.(i)Berhan,Yifru,andBerhan(2014) Intheirarticle“ReasonsForPersistentlyHighMaternalandPerinatalMortalitiesinEthiopia:PartII–Socio-EconomicandCulturalFactors,”theauthorsseektoexplainthefertilityratesbyexaminingpredisposingfactorsforpregnancy-relatedhealthrisksinEthiopia.Theauthorsincludedthemoderncontraceptiveuse,harmfultraditionalpractice,adultliteracyrates,andlevelofincomeaspredictorsoffertilityratesandusedaregressionmodeltopredictthedependentvariable.TheyconcludethatthefertilityrateinEthiopiadecreasedduetoanincreaseincontraceptiveusebyafactorof7,decreaseduseofdangerousfemalecircumcision,andanincreaseintheadultliteracyratewhichimplieshigherpre-andpost-natalhealthcareandaccessibilitytoeconomicresources.(ii)Asamoah,Benedict,Agardh,andÖstergren(2013) Intheirarticle“InequalityinFertilityRateandModernContraceptiveUseAmongGhanaianWomenfrom1988-2008,”theauthorsseektoexaminetheuseofcontraceptivesbywomenwholiveinlowsocioeconomicplanesaswellasalackoffamilyplanningservicesavailabletothem.Usingsurveystocollectdataandanappliedregressionmodel,theauthorsconcludethatequalityincontraceptiveuseincreasedoverthestudy’stimespan.However,inequalityinfertilityrateincreasedaswell,whileeducationandincomeinequalitiesweremaintainedoverthesameperiod. Thesestudiesillustratetheimportanceofaneffective,comprehensiveapproachtopopulationstudies.Populationisacomplex,nuanced,overarchingconstructthatisdifficulttoapproachinanyway;assuch,theliteraturefocusesonnarrowaspectsonstateorregionallevels.Aglobalregressionapproachtoexplainingfertilityratesislackinginthecurrentliterature;suchanapproach,ofcourse,maynotexistduetoomittedvariablebias,lowexplanatorypower,andfundamentaldatacollectionobstaclesthatprecluderesearchersfromdevelopingaworldwideanalysisonthesubject.However,thestudyinthispaperseeksto,attheveryleast,createdataanalysesinapilotstudythatcouldtriggerfurtherevaluationbyotherresearchers.
![Page 5: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ENDOGENOUSVARIABLESFertilityRate(Dependentvariable) Thisvariablemeasuresthenumberofchildbirthsperwomaninacountry.Itiscalculatedbyestimatinghowmanychildrenawomanwouldbeargiventhatshelivestotheendofherchildbearingyears.Thisvariableislog-transformedinordertodemonstratetheproportionalchangeoffertilityratesduetochangesintheratesofindependentvariables.ContraceptivePrevalence Thisvariableismostlikelythemostinfluentialpredictoroffertilityratesacrosstheworld.Thisvariablemeasuresthepercentageofwomenandtheirsexualpartnerswhoutilizeanyformofcontraception.Itismeasuredonlyforwomenages15-49.Withoutknowingtheestimationoutput,itisestimatedthisvariablewillhaveanegativecoefficient,asanincreaseinthecontraceptiveprevalenceratewillleadtoadecreaseinthebirthrate.GDPPerCapita GDPpercapitaisthegrossdomesticproductofacountrydividedbyitspopulation.DatainthisstudyareincurrentUnitedStatesdollars.Thisvariableislog-transformedinordertodemonstratetheeffectsofaproportionalchangeinGDP;withoutlogtransformingit,GDPistheonlyindependentvariablethatisnotinapercentorrate,andskewsthedataheavily.Withoutknowingtheestimationoutput,itisestimatedthisvariablewillhaveanegativecoefficient,asthericherthecountry,thelessneedforchildrenaslaborersorsocialsupportsystemsfortheelderly.HealthExpenditure Healthexpenditureisthesumofpublicandprivatehealthexpensesofacountry.ItismeasuredasapercentoftotalGDP.AccordingtotheWorldBank,itincludes“provisionofhealthservices(preventativeandcurative),familyplanningactivities,nutritionactivities,andemergencyaiddesignatedforhealthbutdoesnotincludeprovisionofwaterandsanitation.”Withoutknowingtheestimationoutput,itisestimatedthisvariablewillhaveanegativecoefficient,asanincreaseintheamountofhealthexpendituresofacountrywouldleadtoahealthierpopulace,accesstoprenatalcare,lessneedforchildrentosupportelderlyinpoorhealth,etc.allofwhichwouldreducethefertilityrate.InternetUsers Thisvariablemeasuresthepercentofacountry’spopulationwhohaveaccesstotheinternet.Withoutknowingtheestimationoutput,itisestimatedthatthisvariablewouldhaveanegativecoefficient,asaccesstotheworldwidenetworkwouldenablethedisseminationofculture,education,andideasregardinggeneralwellness,familyplanning,andreproductivehealth.Furthermore,accesstotheinternetwoulddenoteindividualshaveelectronicdeviceswhichcanaccessthe
![Page 6: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
network,implyingtheindividualshaveaneconomicstationwhichallowsthemtoaffordthosedevices.LaborForceParticipationRate–Female Thisvariablemeasurestheproportionofthepopulationthatiseconomicallyactive.TheWorldBankdatausesages15andup.Thisregressionmodeldemarcatesbetweenmaleandfemaleparticipationrate,sinceinsomecountries,culturalpracticesprecludewomenfromparticipatinginthelaborforce.Withoutknowingtheestimationoutput,itishypothesizedthatthecoefficientonthisvariableisnegative;asanincreasingnumberofwomenpursueworkorcareers,asmalleramountofwomenaresolelyassignedtochildbearingactivities.LaborForceParticipationRate–Male
Thisvariablemeasurestheproportionofthepopulationthatiseconomicallyactive.TheWorldBankdatausesages15andup.Thisregressionmodeldemarcatesbetweenmaleandfemaleparticipationrate,sinceinsomecountries,culturalpracticesprecludewomenfromparticipatinginthelaborforce.Withoutknowingtheestimationoutput,itishypothesizedthatthecoefficientonthisvariableisnegative;asanincreasingnumberofmenpursueworkorcareers,familyunitshavehighereconomicresourcesandthusrelylessonchildrenaslaborersorcaretakers.LiteracyRate–Female Thisvariablemeasuresthepercentofthepopulationwhocanbothreadandwriteatanelementarylevel.Thisregressionmodeldemarcatesbetweenmaleandfemaleparticipationrate,sinceinsomecountries,culturalpracticesprecludewomenfromeducation.Withoutknowingtheestimationoutput,itisestimatedthiscoefficientisnegative;amoreliteratefemalepopulationimpliesamoreeducatedfemalepopulation,whohavesocioeconomicmeansandaccesstogreaterhealthcareoptions.LiteracyRate–Male Thisvariablemeasuresthepercentofthepopulationwhocanbothreadandwriteatanelementarylevel.Thisregressionmodeldemarcatesbetweenmaleandfemaleparticipationrate,sinceinsomecountries,culturalpracticesprecludewomenfromeducation.Withoutknowingtheestimationoutput,itisestimatedthiscoefficientisnegative;amoreliteratemalepopulationwillimpliesamoreeducatedmalepopulation,whohavesocioeconomicmeansandaccesstogreaterhealthcareoptions.MalnutritionUnder5YearsofAge Thisvariablemeasuresthepercentageofchildrenundertheageof5“whoseheightforage(stunting)ismorethantwostandarddeviationsbelowthemedianfortheinternationalreferencepopulationages…ThedataarebasedontheWorldHealthOrganization’snewchildgrowthstandardsreleasedin2006.”Withoutknowingtheestimationoutput,itisestimatedthisvariableispositive.Thehigherthepercentageofmalnourishedchildren,thelesssocioeconomicresiliencetothe
![Page 7: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
environmentthereis,thelesshealthcarethereis,andthehigherrelianceonmorechildrentosustaintheworkandhomethereis. MobilePhoneSubscriptions Thisvariablemeasuresthepercentageofcellphonesthatareconnectedtoacellularnetworkinacountry.Withoutknowingtheestimationoutput,itisforecastedthatthiscoefficientisnegative;morecellphonesmeansamoreindustrialized,developednationwhichgrantsaccesstoeducation,healthcare,andinformation.MortalityUnder5YearsofAge Thisvariablemeasurestheprobabilityper1,000thatachildwilldiebeforeturningfiveyearsold.Withoutknowingtheestimationoutput,itisestimatedthiscoefficientwillbepositive;intheunfortunaterealitythatacountryhasahighmortalityrate,thereislikelymoresocioeconomicdistress,lesshealthcare,andmoreconflict.Thismeansahigherfertilityrateisneededtosustainthepopulation.PovertyRate Thepovertyratemeasurestherelativeratesofpovertyaccordingtoacountry’sstandardofpoverty.Thisvariablemustbeusedwithcaution,sincestandardsofpovertyarerelativeandreporteddifferentlyonacountry-by-countrybasis.Withoutknowingtheregressionoutput,itisestimatedthiscoefficientispositive;higherpovertyleadstoaneedforchildrenforlaborandtocarefortheelderlyastheyage.RatioofGirlstoBoysinPrimaryandSecondaryEducation Thisvariablemeasurestheratioofgirlstoboysinprimaryandsecondaryeducation,inbothpublicandprivateschools.Withoutknowingtheestimationoutput,itishypothesizedthatthiscoefficientispositive;thehigherinequalityineducation(thelessgirlseducatedincontrasttoboys),themoregenderinequalityandhigherfertilityratesacountrymighthave.RuralPopulation Thisvariablemeasuredtheproportionofacountry’spopulacethatlivesinruralareas.Itisestimatedthatthiscoefficientispositive;isolatedareaslackaccesstotheInternet,tohealthcareservices,tocontraceptionresources,andmore.Thiswouldpresumablyleadtoariseinfertilityrates.
![Page 8: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
REGRESSIONEQUATION
Thefollowingregressionequationisusedtocreatethemodelforthisstudy.𝐿𝑜𝑔 𝐹𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒
= 𝛽! + 𝛽! 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 + 𝛽!(log 𝐺𝐷𝑃 𝑃𝑒𝑟 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎+ 𝛽! 𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑡ℎ 𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑠 + 𝛽! 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑒𝑡 𝑈𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑠+ 𝛽! 𝐿𝐹𝑃𝑅 𝐹𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑒 + 𝛽! 𝐿𝐹𝑃𝑅 𝑀𝑎𝑙𝑒+ 𝛽! 𝐿𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑦 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝐹𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑒 + 𝛽! 𝐿𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑦 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑀𝑎𝑙𝑒+ 𝛽! 𝑀𝑎𝑙𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 5 + 𝛽!" 𝑀𝑜𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑒 𝑃ℎ𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑆𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠+ 𝛽!! 𝑀𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 5 + 𝛽!" 𝑃𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒+ 𝛽!" 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 𝑜𝑓 𝐺𝑖𝑟𝑙𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝐵𝑜𝑦𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝐸𝑑+ 𝛽!"(𝑅𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛)
InitialAnalysis
Uponinitialreviewoftheestimationoutput,itappearsthattheregressionmodeldoesafairlygoodjobatexplainingthevariationoffertilityratesacrossthe14selectedvariableswithanadjustedR-squaredisapproximately81.7%.Furthermore,theF-statisticoftheregressionis32.79,whichisverysubstantialforanF-statistic.Afewvariablesstandoutasimportant(wewilltesttheirsignificanceinthefollowingsection):contraceptiveprevalencerate,GDPpercapita,percentofpopulationwithaccesstointernet,thelaborforceparticipationrateformales,mortalityrateforchildrenunder5yearsold,andthepovertyrateofeachcountry.
![Page 9: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
STATISTICALSIGNIFICANCEFirst,wewillevaluatethestatisticalsignificanceofeachvariableusingthefollowingstructureofat-test:
𝐻!: 𝑡 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑜𝑓𝛽! < 𝐶𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑡 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝐻!: 𝑡 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑜𝑓 𝛽! ≥ 𝐶𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑡 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒
Ifthecriticaltvalueof𝛽! isgreaterthanthecriticaltvalue,werejectthenullhypothesis,and𝛽! isstatisticallysignificant.For101observations:T
Thecriticalt-valueis1.986at5%levelofstatisticalsignificance. Thecriticalt-valueis1.660at10%levelofstatisticalsignificance.
Variable t-value Conclusionat5% Conclusionat10% 1.986 1.660
ContraceptivePrevalence
-3.10 Statisticallysignificant Statisticallysignificant
Log(GDPPerCapita) -1.95 Statisticallyinsignificant(almostsignificant)
Statisticallysignificant
HealthExpenditure
-0.99 Statisticallyinsignificant Statisticallyinsignificant
InternetUsers
-1.69 Statisticallyinsignificant Statisticallysignificant
LFPR–Female
-1.36 Statisticallyinsignificant Statisticallyinsignificant
LFPR–Male
3.27 Statisticallysignificant Statisticallysignificant
LiteracyRate-Female
0.55 Statisticallyinsignificant Statisticallyinsignificant
LiteracyRate–Male
0.57 Statisticallyinsignificant Statisticallyinsignificant
MalnutritionUnder5
-0.72 Statisticallyinsignificant Statisticallyinsignificant
MobilePhones
0.50 Statisticallyinsignificant Statisticallyinsignificant
MortalityUnder5
3.27 Statisticallysignificant Statisticallysignificant
PovertyRate
2.59 Statisticallysignificant Statisticallysignificant
GirlstoBoysinPrim/SecEducation
-0.52 Statisticallyinsignificant Statisticallyinsignificant
RuralPopulationRate
-1.08 Statisticallyinsignificant Statisticallyinsignificant
![Page 10: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
JOINTSIGNIFICANCE
FtestsWewillconductF-testsonselectcombinationsofvariablestodeterminewhethertheyarejointlysignificantdespitebeingsingularlyinsignificant.F-testsfollowthetemplate:
𝐻!: 𝐹 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐 < 𝐶𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝐹 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝐻!: 𝐹 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐 ≥ 𝐶𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝐹 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒
Withonerestrictioninthenumeratorand(n-k-1)=(101–14–1)=86degreesoffreedominthedenominator,the5%Fvalueis3.97andthe10%Fvalueis2.77.F-test#1: LiteracyRateofFemales LiteracyRateofMales
Thejointvalueofmaleandfemaleliteracyratesisnotsignificant.
![Page 11: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
F-test#2: InternetUsers MobilePhoneSubscriptions
InternetUsersandMobilePhoneSubscriptionsarejointlysignificantatthe10%level.Thismeansthetwovariablestogetherhassomeexplanatoryvalue.F-test#3 Log(GDP_PC) LFPR_Female LFPR_Male
GDPPerCapita,LFPRoffemales,andLFPRofmalesarejointlysignificantatthe5%level.
![Page 12: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
HETEROSKEDASTICITYWithsuchalargedatasetthatspansallcountriesoftheworld,itisimperativewecheckforheteroskedasticity(unequalvariance).WewilldothisbyusingtheBreusch-PaganTestforHeteroskedasticity.Thistestappearsasfollows:
𝐻!: 𝐹 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐 < 𝐶𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝐵𝑃 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝐻!: 𝐹 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐 ≥ 𝐶𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝐵𝑃 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒
Usingp-values,thisisequivalentto:
𝐻!: 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝐹 > 0.05𝐻!: 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝐹 ≤ 0.05
Eitherway,ifwefailtorejectthenullhypothesis,thereisnotsubstantialevidenceofheteroskedasticity.Ifwedorejectthenullhypothesis,thereisevidenceofheteroskedasticity,andwewillhavetore-runourregressiontocontrolforit.
ByexaminingtheprobabilityvalueofFat0.1092,weseethatthereisnotevidenceofheteroskedasticityatthe0.05p-value,althoughasweincreasep-valueto0.11weriskseeingit.Assuch,weruntheheteroskedasticity-controlledWhiteOLSregressiontoensurehomoscedasticity.
![Page 13: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
WiththeWhiteOLSheteroskedasticity-controlledregression,wefindveryfewchangestoouroriginalregression,whichsuggeststhatheteroskedasticityisnotaconcern.OuradjustedR-squaredvalueremainsroughlythesame,andallthesignificancesofourindependentvariablesremainthesame,exceptfortwo:log(GDP_PC)andInternetUsers.Aftercontrollingforheteroskedasticity,wefindthatGDPPerCapitahasbecomesignificantatthe5%levelfort-tests,andInternetUsershasbecomelesssignificant.Whatthissuggestsisthatthevarianceonmostindependentvariableswashomoscedastic;however,onGDPandInternetUsersthevariancewasheteroskedastic.Bycontrollingforitsunequalvariance,ourregressionbecomesmoreaccurate.
![Page 14: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
LIMITATIONSWithanyambitiousstudy,therearecertainlimitationstoconsider.Mostconcernslayunderthreecategories:datacollectionandmethodology.Datacollection (i)Incompletedata.Collectingsuchalargesurveyofeverycountryintheworldisagrandundertaking.Giventhatthereare195*countriesintheworld(*somecountriessuchasTaiwanorSyriaarenotconsideredlegitimatecountriesincertaincircles),collectingdataonallofthemisdifficult.TheWorldBank,WorldHealthOrganization,andtheCIAWorldFactbookalldeliversubstantialamountsofdataregardinginternationalactors;however,duetosomecountries’inabilityorrefusaltocontributeaccuratestatisticstothesereportshinderstheabilityforresearcherstodrawcompleteconclusionsaboutallcountriesintheworld.Thedifficultydoesnotnecessarilyliewithonecountryfailingtoreportonevariable;thedifficultyisthatmanycountriesfailtoreportdifferentvariables.Thisstudymeasured14variables.Ifacountryfailedtoreportonanyofthose14,thestatisticalpackageusedwouldnotincludethatcountryinthefinalregressionoutput.Thisisalimitationontheconcludingpowerofthestudy;however,afteraround15hoursofdatacollectionandcleaning,theauthorfeelsasamplesizeof101countriesisagreatstartingpointforfurtherinvestigationorpilotstudy.
(ii)Omittedvariablebias.Aswithanystudymeasuringaverynuancedandcomplexdependentvariablesuchasfertilityratesacrosstheworld,thereareinfinitelymanyindependentvariablestochoosefromtopredictthedependentvariable.Thisstudystartedwithfiveindependentvariables,butrecognizedtheneedforamorecomprehensiveperspectivetofullyexplainthedependentvariable.Fromfivevariablestofourteen,thestudy’sR-squaredvaluegrewfrom45%to84%,whichmeans84%ofthevariationinfertilityratesisexplainedbytheendogenousvariablesinthestudy.However,itisclearthatmanymorevariablescouldbeexaminedtoincreasetheexplanatorypowerofthestudy.Itisimportanttonotethatmuchofthevarianceinfertilityratesisexplainedbyqualitativedatasuchasethnicity,religion,andculture,eachofwhichhavethousandsofpossiblevalues.AnR-squaredvalueof84%isquiteexcitingtodiscovergiventhe14includedvariables.Methodology (i)Multicollinearity.Astudyfocusedonfertilityratesiscomplex.Almosteveryincludedindependentvariableisnotexactlyindependent.Forexample,theratioofgirlstoboysinprimaryandsecondaryeducationisinfluencedbythelaborforceparticipationrateofeachgender.GDPisaffectedbytheamountofpeoplelivinginruralareasandtheliteracyratesofeachgender.Malnutritionandmortalityratesforchildrenunder5arehighlycorrelated.Themulticollinearityofthestudyneedstobetakenintoconsiderationbeforeconcludinganyresults.
![Page 15: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
CONCLUDINGREMARKS Thusfar,wehavedefinedourvariables,runtheregression,evaluatedstatisticalsignificance,evaluatedjointsignificance,andtestedandcorrectedforheteroskedasticity.Whatdoourresultstellus?RemarksonSignificantVariablesThemostsignificantvariablesinthisregressionmodel(inorderofsignificance)are:
(1)ContraceptivePrevalence.Thisindependentbeingthemostsignificantisrelativelystraightforward.Unlikeothervariables,whichhaveanindirectcausallinktoincreasingorreducingthefertilityrate,contraceptivesdirectlyreducefertilityrateastheirfunction.Everypercentincreaseincontraceptiveprevalencereducesoverallfertilityrateinacountrybyabout0.5%,ceterisparibus.Theoretically,byexpandingcontraceptiveusetoaquarterofthepopulationbetweenages15and49,thebirthratewouldbeloweredby12.5%.Themagnitudeofthischangeinitiallyseemssmall;however,byreducingfertilityateven5%acrossthehundredsofmillionsofpeopleinsomecountries,asubstantialunsustainableoverpopulationthresholdwouldbereduced.(2)MortalityRateUnder5YearsofAge.Thisindependentvariableisverytellingabouttheconditionsofglobalsocio-economy.Themortalityratepredictstherateatwhichchildrenundertheageof5die.Inthetragicsituationswherethisrateishigh,economicandhealthfactorsthatexistinthecountryareextremelypoor.Malnourishment,lackofaccesstoimmunizations,unsanitarymedicalandculturalpractices,conflict,andextremepovertyallcontributetoahighmortalityrate,especiallyforchildren.Incountriesthatsufferfromtheseproblems,theremaybealackofsocialsafetynetfortheelderly–withoutafoundationalgenerationofchildren,whowouldtakecareoftheelderly?Withoutnewgenerationsofchildren,whowillsustainthelaboreconomy?Theanswertothesequestionsisgenerallynoone;assuch,ahigherfertilityisneededtoensurenewgenerationscansustaintheold.Sinceitscoefficientispositive,a1%increaseinmortalityrateforchildrenunder5explainsa0.38%increaseinthefertilityrate.(3)LaborForceParticipationRate–Male.Thisindependentvariablewasamongthemostshockingvariablestotheauthoratinitialanalysis.Itisinterestingtonotethelaborforceparticipationrateoffemalesislesssignificantofavariablethanformales.However,usingaculturalparadigm,thismakessense;manyculturesprecludewomenfromenteringtheworkforceeithereconomicallyorsocially.Assuch,theamountofmenwhoparticipateinthelaborforcehasamuchheavierweight.AnincreaseintheLFPRformenexplainsalmosta1%increaseinthefertilityrate,incontrasttoanincreaseofwomeninthelaborforcewhichdecreasesfertilityrate(albeitatasmallermagnitude).
![Page 16: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
(4)PovertyRate.Thisindependentvariableexplainsmuchofthevarianceinfertilityrateastheeconomicconditionsofpovertycontributetotheunifyingholisticpictureoftheunderlyingdemandforahighfertilityrate,asdiscussedpreviouslyinthisreport.Anincreaseof1%inthepovertyrateexplainsanincreaseofmorethe0.4%inthefertilityrate.(5)GDPPerCapita.Whilebeinglesssignificantthantheaforementionedfourindependentvariables,GDPPerCapitaremainsaverysignificantpredictorforfertilityrates.Interestingly,whileitsstatisticalsignificanceislowerthanthepreviousfour,themagnitudeofitscoefficientismuchgreater.A1%increaseintheGDPPerCapitareducesfertilityratesby8.8%.Thismakessense;ascountriesgetricher,theygenerallyprovidemoresocialservicesandhealthcareservices,reducingtheneedforchildrentosustaintheeconomyandcarefortheelderlyorthesick.OverallConclusions OfthemanyWorldBankdevelopmentmeasures,thenumberofbirthsperwomanisaparamountindicatortounderstandingtheeconomichealthandwelfareofacountry.Thisstudysoughttocreateamultivariate,ordinaryleastsquaresregressionmodeltoexplainthevarianceoffertilityratesacrosstheworld.Using14variablesandcorrectingforheteroskedasticity,themodelexplain81.6to84.2%ofthevariationinfertilityratesacrosstheworld.Themostsignificantvariablesaffectingthefertilityratearecontraceptiveprevalence,mortalityrateofchildrenunder5,thelaborforceparticipationrateformales,thepovertyrate,andGDPPerCapita.Near-significantvariablesexplainingfertilityratesincludetheproportionofacitizenrywholiveinruralareas,thelaborforceparticipationrateforfemales,andtheproportionofapopulacethathasaccesstotheInternet. Theimplicationsofthisstudyarecauseforfurtherinvestigationintothesocioeconomicpredictorsofbirthratesaswellaspolicyimplicationsforlawmakersacrosstheworld.Furtherstudiesshouldseektocollectmorefulldata,reducetheriskofmulticollinearity,andperhapsstudyabroaderrangeofindependentvariables.However,usingtheinformationcollectedinthisstudy,theauthor’srecommendationisforgloballeaders,nonprofits,andinternationalagenciestoseektoprovidemoresafecontraceptionmethods,fundeducationforwomen,delivermoreeffectiveandlong-termaidpackages,andgiveaccesstohealthcaremeasurestodevelopingcountriesstrugglingwithunsustainablepopulationrates.Hopefully,theUNcanreachitsMillenniumDevelopmentgoalstostabilizetheglobalpopulationthenextfewdecades.
![Page 17: Econometrics Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042708/58ad72741a28ab2a768b4b71/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
WorksCited
Asamoah,BenedictO.,AnetteAgardh,andPer-OlofÖstergren."InequalityIn
FertilityRateAndModernContraceptiveUseAmongGhanaianWomenFrom1988-2008."InternationalJournalForEquityInHealth12.1(2013):37-48.AcademicSearchComplete.Web.2Dec.2014.
Berhan,Yifru,andAsresBerhan."ReasonsForPersistentlyHighMaternalAnd
PerinatalMortalitiesInEthiopia:PartIi-Socio-EconomicAndCulturalFactors."EthiopianJournalOfHealthSciences24.(2014):119-136.AcademicSearchComplete.Web.2Dec.2014.
Databases
http://data.worldbank.org/indicatorhttp://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/iwraw/cescrarmenia.htmhttp://www.scw.bh/UploadFiles/pdf/BahrainiWomen_inNumbers2013.pdfhttp://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002299/229929E.pdfhttp://www.tradingeconomics.com/cambodia/ratio-of-girls-to-boys-in-primary-
and-secondary-education-percent-wb-data.htmlhttp://www.tradingeconomics.com/comoros/ratio-of-girls-to-boys-in-primary-
and-secondary-education-percent-wb-data.htmlhttp://www.tradingeconomics.com/congo/ratio-of-girls-to-boys-in-primary-and-
secondary-education-percent-wb-data.htmlhttp://www.tradingeconomics.com/republic-of-the-congo/contraceptive-
prevalence-percent-of-women-ages-15-49-wb-data.htmlhttp://kff.org/global-indicator/contraceptive-prevalence-rate/http://www.photius.com/rankings/economy/population_below_poverty_line_2013
_1.htmlhttps://www.census.gov/popclock/