ece 350 fields and waves ii the smith chartjsa.ece.illinois.edu/bach_khoa/ece350/notes/smith.pdf ·...

13
ECE 350 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 1 ECE 350 Fields and Waves II The Smith Chart Jose E. Schutt-Aine Electrical & Computer Engineering University of Illinois [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 09-Jun-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ECE 350 Fields and Waves II The Smith Chartjsa.ece.illinois.edu/bach_khoa/ece350/notes/smith.pdf · Derivation of the Smith Chart o 1(z) Z(z) Z 1(z) n 1(z)1 Z(z) 1(z)1 The relationship

ECE 350 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 1

ECE 350Fields and Waves II

The Smith Chart

Jose E. Schutt-AineElectrical & Computer Engineering

University of [email protected]

Page 2: ECE 350 Fields and Waves II The Smith Chartjsa.ece.illinois.edu/bach_khoa/ece350/notes/smith.pdf · Derivation of the Smith Chart o 1(z) Z(z) Z 1(z) n 1(z)1 Z(z) 1(z)1 The relationship

ECE 350 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 2

TL Equations

tantan

R oo

o R

Z jZ lZ l ZZ jZ l

2( ) j lRl e

1 ( )( )1 ( )o

zZ z Zz

( )( )( )

o

o

Z z ZzZ z Z

Impedance Transformation 

Reflection Coefficient Transformation 

Reflection Coefficient – to Impedance 

Impedance to Reflection Coefficient 

2( ) 1 j z j z

Ro

VI z e eZ

2( ) 1j z j zRV z V e e

Voltage Current

Page 3: ECE 350 Fields and Waves II The Smith Chartjsa.ece.illinois.edu/bach_khoa/ece350/notes/smith.pdf · Derivation of the Smith Chart o 1(z) Z(z) Z 1(z) n 1(z)1 Z(z) 1(z)1 The relationship

ECE 350 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 3

Derivation of the Smith Chart

o1 ( z )Z( z ) Z1 ( z )

n1 ( z ) 1Z ( z )1 ( z ) 1

The relationship between impedance and reflection coefficient is given by:

where Zo is the characteristic impedance of the system.  The normalized impedance is

r ij nZ r jx

The reflection coefficient and the normalized impedance have the form:

and

Page 4: ECE 350 Fields and Waves II The Smith Chartjsa.ece.illinois.edu/bach_khoa/ece350/notes/smith.pdf · Derivation of the Smith Chart o 1(z) Z(z) Z 1(z) n 1(z)1 Z(z) 1(z)1 The relationship

ECE 350 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 4

( ( =

(r i r i

2 2r i

1 ) j 1 ) j1 )

( (=(

2 2r i r i r i

2 2r i

1 j 1 ) j 1 )r jx1 )

Therefore

Separating real and imaginary components,

r i

r i

1 jr jx1 j

Derivation of the Smith Chart

(

2 2r i

2 2r i

1r1 )

Isolating the real part from both sides

Page 5: ECE 350 Fields and Waves II The Smith Chartjsa.ece.illinois.edu/bach_khoa/ece350/notes/smith.pdf · Derivation of the Smith Chart o 1(z) Z(z) Z 1(z) n 1(z)1 Z(z) 1(z)1 The relationship

ECE 350 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 5

2 2 2r r i r ir 1 2 1

2 2r i r( r 1 ) ( r 1 ) 2r 1 r

2 2 rr i

2r 1 r1 r 1 r

2 22 2 rr i 2 2

2r r 1 r r1 r (1 r ) 1 r (1 r )

22

r i 2

r 11 r (1 r )

Multiplying through by the denominator,

Completing the square

Derivation of the Smith Chart

or

Page 6: ECE 350 Fields and Waves II The Smith Chartjsa.ece.illinois.edu/bach_khoa/ece350/notes/smith.pdf · Derivation of the Smith Chart o 1(z) Z(z) Z 1(z) n 1(z)1 Z(z) 1(z)1 The relationship

ECE 350 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 6

r ,01 r

11 r

This is the equation of a circle centered at 

and of radius 

22

r i 2

r 11 r (1 r )

Derivation of the Smith Chart

Equating the imaginary parts gives

i2 2

r i

2x(1 )

2 2r r i ix 1 2 2

2 2r r i ix 2x x 2 x or

Page 7: ECE 350 Fields and Waves II The Smith Chartjsa.ece.illinois.edu/bach_khoa/ece350/notes/smith.pdf · Derivation of the Smith Chart o 1(z) Z(z) Z 1(z) n 1(z)1 Z(z) 1(z)1 The relationship

ECE 350 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 7

11,x

1x

This is the equation of a circle centered at 

of radius 

2 2 ir r i 2 2

2 1 12 1 1 1x x x

2

2r i 2

1 11x x

Derivation of the Smith Chart

Page 8: ECE 350 Fields and Waves II The Smith Chartjsa.ece.illinois.edu/bach_khoa/ece350/notes/smith.pdf · Derivation of the Smith Chart o 1(z) Z(z) Z 1(z) n 1(z)1 Z(z) 1(z)1 The relationship

ECE 350 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 8

n

n

Z 1 r 1 jxZ 1 r 1 jx

1/ 22 2

2 2

( r 1 ) x 1( r 1) x

n1 ( z )Z1 ( z )

n

1 1 ( z )yZ 1 ( z )

The reflection coefficient is given by

We also have

The Smith Chart

Thus, going from normalized impedance to normalized admittance corresponds to a 180 degree shift.

Page 9: ECE 350 Fields and Waves II The Smith Chartjsa.ece.illinois.edu/bach_khoa/ece350/notes/smith.pdf · Derivation of the Smith Chart o 1(z) Z(z) Z 1(z) n 1(z)1 Z(z) 1(z)1 The relationship

ECE 350 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 9

The Smith Chart

3 ways to move on the Smith chartConstant SWR circle  displacement along TLConstant resistance (conductance) circleaddition of reactance (susceptance)Constant reactance (susceptance) arc  addition of resistance (conductance)

Page 10: ECE 350 Fields and Waves II The Smith Chartjsa.ece.illinois.edu/bach_khoa/ece350/notes/smith.pdf · Derivation of the Smith Chart o 1(z) Z(z) Z 1(z) n 1(z)1 Z(z) 1(z)1 The relationship

ECE 350 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 10

The Smith Chart

Page 11: ECE 350 Fields and Waves II The Smith Chartjsa.ece.illinois.edu/bach_khoa/ece350/notes/smith.pdf · Derivation of the Smith Chart o 1(z) Z(z) Z 1(z) n 1(z)1 Z(z) 1(z)1 The relationship

ECE 350 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 11

2270 3 0 4 0 6 jR Rz . j . . e

0 5 0 435 0 065mind . . .

2.  SWR on the lineSWR=4.0

1. Reflection coefficient at load

3. dmin

Smith Chart Example

FIND:

Page 12: ECE 350 Fields and Waves II The Smith Chartjsa.ece.illinois.edu/bach_khoa/ece350/notes/smith.pdf · Derivation of the Smith Chart o 1(z) Z(z) Z 1(z) n 1(z)1 Z(z) 1(z)1 The relationship

ECE 350 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 12

50 0 26 0 09 13 4 5. j . j .

3 5 1 2 50 0 068 0 025. j . / . j .

0 14 0 325 0 185 0 14. . j . .

4. Line impedance at 0.05 to the left

6. Location nearest to load where Real[y]=1

5. Line admittance at 0.05l

Smith Chart Example

Page 13: ECE 350 Fields and Waves II The Smith Chartjsa.ece.illinois.edu/bach_khoa/ece350/notes/smith.pdf · Derivation of the Smith Chart o 1(z) Z(z) Z 1(z) n 1(z)1 Z(z) 1(z)1 The relationship

ECE 350 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 13

Smith Chart Example