dynamic soil structure interaction_02_chapter2_nagano
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
1/42
Dynamic Soil-Structure-
InteractionMasayuki Nagano, Dr. Eng.
Professor
Department of Architecture
Faculty of Science & Technology
Tokyo University of Science
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
2/42
Amplification of ground motion in surface soil
Structural response
Dynamic soil spring
Foundation input motion
Ground motion on surface
Amplification of ground motion in surface soil is important in that it is directly
reflected into earthquake input motion to the structure and it controls wholestructural response.
Ground motion on
outcropped
engineering bedrock
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
3/42
CHAPTER 2 :AMPLIFICATION OF
GROUND MOTION INSURFACE SOIL
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
4/42
Chapter 2, amplification of ground motion in surfacesoil, consists of following three sections;
2.1 One-Dimensional Shear Wave Propagation Theory
2.2 S-Wave Propagation in Multi-Layered Strata
2.3 Response Analysis of Multi-Layered StrataConsidering Soil Nonlinearity
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
5/42
2.1 One-Dimensional Shear Wave Propagation Theory
Consider a shear column with unit cross-section area,and it has Gof shear modulus and of mass density.
z
G.L
G Soil
Shear column
The positive z is taken as downward direction.
z
dzz
+
2
2
t
udz
u dz
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
6/42
(1) Equation of Motion
Shear stress is expressedby
G: Shear modulus
z
u
: Shear strain
where,
)1(0dzt
udz
z 2
2
=
+
)2(zt
u2
2
=
)3(z
uG
=
Consider the dynamic equilibrium of a small element,
z
dzz
+
2
2
t
udz
u dz
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
7/42
Putting Eq.(3) into Eq.(2)
leads to
Eq.(4) is an equation of motion for one-dimensionalshear wave propagation.
)4(z
u
Gt
u2
2
2
2
=
z
dzz
+
2
2
t
u
dz
u dz
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
8/42
(2) General solution in time domain
The velocity VS of shear wave (S-wave) is expressed by:
Using VS, Eq.(4) can be transferred to:
The general solution of Eq.(6) is given by:
where, E(t+z/VS) and F(t-z/VS) are arbitrary functions in
terms of t and z.
)5(/GVS =
)6(z
u
Vt
u2
22
S2
2
=
)7(VztF
VztE)z,t(u
SS
+
+=
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
9/42
E(t+z/VS) indicates the
displacement due to abackward propagatingwave which propagates inthe negative z direction.
It is called "upward wave".
while F(t-z/VS) due to aforward propagating wavepropagating in the
positive zdirection.
It is called "downwardwave".
z
xE
F
Characters E & F areconventionally used toexpress the "upward &downward" waves in the 1-
D wave propagation."2E" is used as a jargon toexpress motions on
outcropped bedrock, aswill be discussed later.
z=0
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
10/42
(3) Free surface condition
The simplest, but most important, boundary conditionis free surface condition of the ground.
Let z=0 ground surface, free surface condition is givenby,
)8(0)0z(z
uG)0z( ==
==
From Eq.(7), shear stress is expressed by,
)9(VztF
VztE
V1
z)z,t(u
SSS
+=
&&
where dot express first derivative with respect to time.
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
11/42
From Eqs.(8) and (9), assuming initial condition is zero,
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) )10(tFtEtFtE == &&
Then, Eq.(7) yields
)11(V
ztE
V
ztE)z,t(u
SS
+
+=
On ground surface, putting z=0 into Eq.(11), one canobtain,
( ) ( ))12()t(E2tEtE)0,t(u =+=
Ground motion on surface is twice as verticallyincident wave.
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
12/42
This is a case where S-wave vertically impinges at thebottom of homogeneous half-space. Maximum amplitudeof upward wave is 0.5. Maximum amplitude of the groundmotion on surface becomes 1.0, as we learned.
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
13/42
Consider the wavepropagation in twosemi-infinite media
as shown in thefigure.
When the wave E2(t+z/VS2) propagates upward and
impinges on the interface (z=0) between two media, theincident wave is transformed into the transmission waveE1(t+z/VS1) in medium 1 and the reflection wave F2(t-z/VS2)
in medium 2. Notice that downward wave does not exist inmedium 1.
(4) Transmission and Reflection at Interface
z
: Transmission Wave
: Incident Wave : Reflection wave
G1 1
G2 2
Medium 1
Medium 2z=0
)V/zt(E 1S1 +
)V/zt(E 2S2 + )V/zt(F 2S2
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
14/42
)13(VztE)z,t(u
1S
11
+=
The displacement and shear stress in medium 1:
z 2,VS2
1(z,t) u1(z,t)E1(t+z/VS1)
1,VS1Medium 1
Medium 2
)14(V
ztE
V
G
V
ztE
z
G
z
)z,t(uG)z,t(
1S
1
1S
1
1S
11
111
+=
+
=
=
&
1S1
1S
2
1S1
1S
1 V
V
V
V
G=
=
Considering that
Eq.(14) yields
)15(V
ztEV)z,t(
1S
11S11
+= &
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
15/42
Similarly, for medium 2:
z
2,VS2
2(z,t) u2(z,t)
E2(t+z/VS2) F2(t-z/VS2)
1,VS1Medium 1
Medium 2
)16(VztF
VztE)z,t(u
2S
2
2S
22
+
+=
)17(V
z
tFVV
z
tEV)z,t( 2S22S2
2S22S22
+=&&
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
16/42
At the interface(z=0), displacement and stress must beconsistent, resulting in following boundary consition;
z
2,VS2
2(z=0,t) u2(z,t)
E2(t+z/VS2) F2(t-z/VS2)
1,VS1E1(t+z/VS1)
1(z=0,t) u1(z,t)
Medium 1
Medium 2
)18()0,t(u)0,t(u 21 =
)19()0,t()0,t( 21 =
( ) ( ) ( ) )20(tEtFtE 122 =+
Substituting Eqs.(13), (15) ,(16) and (17) into Eqs.(18) and(19), following relationships
can be obtained;
( ) ( ) ( )tEtFtE 122&&&
=( ) ( ) ( ) )21(tEtFtE 122 =
2S2
1S1
V
V
=where is impedance ratio
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
17/42
Amplitudes of transmission and reflection waves can beexpressed in terms of incident wave.
( ) ( ) )22(tE1
2tE 21 +
=
( ) ( ) )23(tE1
1tF 22 +
=
from (20)+(21)
from(20)-(21)
Define the transmission Tand reflection coefficient Ras:
Transmission coefficient :
Reflection coefficient )25(1
1R
)24(1
2T
+
=
+=
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
18/42
Using Tand R, the transmission wave E1(t+z/VS1) andthe reflection wave F2(t-z/VS2) are given by:
)27()V
zt(E)(R)
V
zt(F
)26()Vzt(E)(T)
Vzt(E
2S
2
2S
2
2S
2
1S
1
+=
+=+
z
2,VS2
E2(t+z/VS2)
F2(t-z/VS2) =R() E2(t+z/VS2)
1,VS1E1(t+z/VS1)=T() E2(t+z/VS2)
=1VS1/2VS2
Medium 1
Medium 2
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
T R
stiffsoft softstiff
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
19/42
This is a case where S-wave vertically impinges at thebottom of a layer built on its half-space. Impedance ratio
is 0.5. Maximum amplitude of upward S wave is 0.5.
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
20/42
QUESTIONS
Q1. Find max. amplitude of transmitted wave in surface layer.Q2. Find max. amplitude of reflected wave in bottom layer.
Q3. Find max. amplitude of ground motion on surface.
Q4. Find max. amplitude of transmitted wave to the lowerhalf-space when the reflected wave from ground surfaceimpinges on boundary.
Q5. Find max. amplitude of reflected wave to the surfacelayer when the reflected wave from ground surface impingeson boundary.
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
21/42
QUESTIONS
Q1. Find max. amplitude of transmitted wave in surface layer.Q2. Find max. amplitude of reflected wave in bottom layer.
Q3. Find max. amplitude of ground motion on surface.
Q4. Find max. amplitude of transmitted wave to the lowerhalf-space when the reflected wave from ground surfaceimpinges on boundary.
Q5. Find max. amplitude of reflected wave to the surfacelayer when the reflected wave from ground surface impingeson boundary.
3
1
5.01
5.01
1
1R
3
4
5.01
2
1
2T
1
1
=+
=+
=
=+
=+
=
3
42T5.0:3Q
6
1R5.0:2Q
3
2T5.0:1Q
1
1
1
=
=
=
3
1
21
21
1
1R
3
2
21
2
1
2T
2
2
=+
=+
=
=+
=+
=
9
2
)3
1
(3
2
RT5.0:5Q
9
4
3
2
3
2
TT5.0:4Q
21
21
==
==
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
22/42
(5) General solution in Frequency Domain
The equation of the motion is given by Eq.(6):
Putting:
in which denotes circular frequency(rad./sec).
)6(z
uV
t
u2
22
S2
2
=
)28(e)z(U)t,z(u ti=
Substituting Eq.(28) into Eq.(6) and deleting exponentialterm, following Helmholtz equation can be obtained;
)29(0z
)z(UV)z(U2
22
S
2 =
)30(0)z(UVz
)z(U
2S
2
2
2
=
+
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
23/42
where,
SV
k
= is wave number(rad.s/m) and transformed as,
SSSS
2
TV
2
V
f2
Vk
=
=
=
=
where, f is frequency(Hz), S is wave length(m).
The solution of Eq.(30) :
is given by:
where Eand Fare arbitrary constants.
)30(0)z(UVz
)z(U2
S
2
2
2
=+
)31(FeEe)z(Uz
Viz
Vi
SS
+=
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
24/42
Substituting Eq.(31) into Eq.(28):
the displacement u(z,t) can be expressed by:
The first term indicates the wave propagating in thenegative zdirection, while the second term in the positivez direction. Eand Fexpress the amplitude of the waves.
Hereafter, the time term eit is not written.
)32(FeEe)t,z(u SSV
zti
V
zti
+
+=
The shear stress T(z) in frequency domain is expressed by:
)33(FeEeVi
FeEeV
i
dz
)z(dU
)z(T
zV
izV
i
S
zV
izV
i
S
SS
SS
=
==
)28(e)z(U)t,z(u ti=
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
25/42
z
x
E
F
As we already discussed,
characters E & F are usedto express the "upward &downward" waves in the 1-D wave propagation.
It is easy to understandconsidering form of Eq.(32).
z=0
)32(FeEe)t,z(u SSV
ztiV
zti
+ +=
Free surface condition E=F and transmission andreflection at interface between two media are similar tothe time domain case, as previously discussed.
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
26/42
Substituting free surface condition E=F into Eq.(32)
yields, considering Euler's formula ,
)34(z
2cosE2zV
f2cosE2z
VcosE2
eeEEeEe)z(U
SSS
zV
izV
izV
izV
iSSSS
=
=
=
+=+=
Again, S is S-wave length(m).At z=S/4, amplitude is equal to zero. This is the firstnodal point for harmonic incident S-wave. Nodal pointsunder surface can be also seen at,
)35(),3,2,1,0n()1n2(
4
z S L=+
=
=
sinicosei
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
27/42
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
28/42
We consider the SH wave propagation in a surfacestratum on the engineering bedrock, when the SH wavewith amplitude E
O
incidents.
(6) Amplification of a surface stratum
on the engineering bedrock
zEO(t): Incident Wave
G1 1 V1
G2 2 V2
G.L
H
Surface Stratum
Engineering Bedrock
1S11 V,,G
2S22 V,,G
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
29/42
Consider the wave propagation in two layered strata asshown, when the SH wave with amplitude Eo incidents onthe interface between the surface stratum and theengineering bedrock.
z1
z2
H
E1 exp(i k1t)
F1 exp(-i k1t)
Eo exp(i k2t) : Incident Wave
F2 exp(-i k2t)
G.L
G1
1
1
G2 2 2
Surface Stratum
Engineering Bedrock
1S11 V,,G
2S22 V,,G
)tV
iexp(F1S
1
)tV
iexp(E1S
1
)tV
iexp(E
2S
0
)tV
iexp(F2S
2
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
30/42
The displacement and shear stress in both strata are givenby:
(1) for the surface stratum:
(2) for the engineering bedrock:
The subscripts 1 and 2 indicate the surface stratum and
the engineering bedrock, respectively. (except E0)
)36(eFeE)z(U1
1S1
1S
zV
i
1
zV
i
111
+=
)37(eFeEVi)z(T1
1S1
1S
zV
i
1
zV
i
11S111
=
)38(eFeE)z(U2
2S2
2S
zV
i
2
zV
i
022
+=
)39(eFeEVi)z(T
22S
22S
zV
i
2
zV
i
02S222
=
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
31/42
Therefore, the displacement and the
shear stress in the surface stratumare:
The shear stress at the groundsurface (z1=0) becomes zero.
G.L
Surface Stratum
Engineering Bedrock
Z1
Z2
1(z1=0) = 0
( ) 0FEVi)0z(T 111S111 ===
)40(FE11
=
)41(eeEeEeE)z(U1
1S
1
1S
1
1S
1
1S
z
V
iz
V
i
1
z
V
i
1
z
V
i
111
+=+=
)42(eeEVieEeEVi)z(T1
1S1
1S1
1S1
1S
zV
izV
i
11S1
zV
i
1
zV
i
11S111
=
=
G LThe boundary conditions are
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
32/42
G.L
Surface Stratum
Engineering Bedrock
Z1
Z2
2(z2=0) = 1(z1=H)
u2(z2=0) = u1(z1=H)
H
The boundary conditions aregiven at the interface between
the surface stratum and theengineering bedrock.
Substituting Eq.(41) and Eq.(42)into Eq.(43):
Putting Eq.(41) and Eq.(42) intoEq.(44):
)43()Hz(U)0z(U 1122 ===
)44()Hz(T)0z(T 1122 ===
)45(eeEFE
HV
iHV
i
120
1S1S
+=+
( ) )46(eeEViFEViH
ViH
Vi
11S1202S21S1S
=
)47(eeEFEH
ViH
Vi
1201S1S
=
2S2
1S1V
V
=where is impedance ratio
HiHi
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
33/42
Eq.(45) :
plus Eq.(47) :
leads to,
)47(eeEFE HViHVi1201S1S
=
++=
H
V
iH
V
i
101S1S e)1(e)1(EE2
)45(eeEFEH
ViH
Vi
1201S1S
+=+
)48(
)ee()ee(
E2
e)1(e)1(
E2E
H
V
iH
V
iH
V
iH
V
i
0
H
V
iH
V
i
01
1S1S1S1S1S1S
++
=
++
=
Similarly, Eq.(45) minus Eq.(47) yields :
)49(E
)ee()ee(
)ee()ee(F 0
HV
iHV
iHV
iHV
i
HViHViHViHVi
2
1S1S1S1S
1S1S1S1S
++
+++=
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
34/42
The displacement US on ground surface is
G.L
Surface Stratum
Engineering Bedrock
Z1
Z2
US = u1(z1=0)
H
EO
)50(
)ee()ee(
E4E2)0z(UU
HV
iHV
iHV
iHV
i
0
111S
1S1S1S1S
++
====
= sinicose iPutting Euler's formula
into Eq.(50) yields;
)51(
)HV
sin(i)HV
cos(
E2U
1S1S
0S
+
=
Ratio of US to 2E0 is expressed by;
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
35/42
EO
2EO
Engineering Bedrock
Outcrop
of Engineering Bedrock
2EO is the displacement of the
engineering bedrock, when thesurface stratum is removed and theengineering bedrock is in outcrop.
Absolute value of transfer function US/(2EO) is:
)53(
)HV(sin)HV(cos
1
E2
U
1S
22
1S
20
S
+
=
)52()H
Vsin(i)H
Vcos(
1
E2
U
1S1S
0
S
+=
Ratio of US to 2E0 is expressed by;
This expression is known as
transfer function.
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
36/42
Similarly, the displacementat the interface is given by:
G.L
Surface Stratum
Engineering Bedrock
Z1
Z2
UB = u2(z2=0)
= u1(z1=H)
H
EO
Absolute value of UB/(2EO) is:
)54(
)HV
tan(i1
E2
)HV
sin(i)HV
cos(
)HV
cos(E2
EE)0z(UU
1S
0
1S1S
1S
0
2022B
+
=
+
=
+===
)55(
)H
V
(tan1
1
E2
U
1S
220
B
+
=
G
US
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
37/42
G.L
Surface Stratum
Engineering Bedrock
Z1
Z2
UB
H
EO
The ratio of US to UB is :
)56(
)HV
cos(
1
)H
V
sin(i)H
V
cos(
)HV
sin(i)HV
cos(
)H
V
cos(
1
)HV
sin(i)HV
cos(
)HV
tan(i1
U
U
1S
1S1S
1S1S
1S
1S1S
1S
B
S
=
+
+
=
+
+=
Notice that transfer function US/UB is determined only by
VS1,H, and irrelevant with soil properties in engineeringbedrock.
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
38/42
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4
=0.2
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.6
H/V1
x(/2)
Dotted Line : Abs.US/(2EO)
Abs.UB/(2EO)
Solid Line : Abs.US/(2EO)
Abs.US/(2EO)
Abs.(US/2EO) and Abs.(UB/2EO)
Th fi l
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
39/42
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4
=0.2
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.6
H/V1
x(/2)
Dotted Line : Abs.US/(2EO)
Abs.UB/(2EO)
Solid Line : Abs.US/(2EO)
Abs.US/(2EO)
1 2
The second naturalcircular frequency:
2=3 1
The first naturalcircular frequency:
1H/VS1=/2 1=(/2)(VS1/H)
Th fi l i d T
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
40/42
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4
=0.2
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.6
H/V1
x(/2)
Dotted Line : Abs.US/(2EO)
Abs.UB/(2EO)
Solid Line : Abs.US/(2EO)
Abs.US/(2EO)
1 2The second natural period T2 and frequency f2:
T2= T1/3 f2= 3f1
The first natural period T1and frequency f1:
T1=2/ 1=(4H)/ VS1f1=1/ T1=VS1/(4H)
These formulas arefrequently used and are
good to memorized.
I E (53) Ab l t
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
41/42
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4
=0.2
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.6
H/V1
x(/2)
Dotted Line : Abs.US/(2EO)
Abs.UB/(2EO)
Solid Line : Abs.US/(2EO)
Abs.US/(2EO)
1 2
max. Us/2Eo
The amplitude ratio atthe resonant frequency
is given by,
1/When the impedance ratio is smaller, theamplification at the natural
frequency becomes larger.
That is, when the surface stratum is much softer than theengineering bedrock, the amplification becomes much
larger.
In Eq.(53), Absolutevalue of transfer
function US/(2EO),
-
8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano
42/42
E N DAll animation files are available at
http://www.rs.noda.tus.ac.jp/nagano-l/ssi.html