dynamic soil structure interaction_02_chapter2_nagano

Upload: nevam21

Post on 05-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    1/42

    Dynamic Soil-Structure-

    InteractionMasayuki Nagano, Dr. Eng.

    Professor

    Department of Architecture

    Faculty of Science & Technology

    Tokyo University of Science

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    2/42

    Amplification of ground motion in surface soil

    Structural response

    Dynamic soil spring

    Foundation input motion

    Ground motion on surface

    Amplification of ground motion in surface soil is important in that it is directly

    reflected into earthquake input motion to the structure and it controls wholestructural response.

    Ground motion on

    outcropped

    engineering bedrock

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    3/42

    CHAPTER 2 :AMPLIFICATION OF

    GROUND MOTION INSURFACE SOIL

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    4/42

    Chapter 2, amplification of ground motion in surfacesoil, consists of following three sections;

    2.1 One-Dimensional Shear Wave Propagation Theory

    2.2 S-Wave Propagation in Multi-Layered Strata

    2.3 Response Analysis of Multi-Layered StrataConsidering Soil Nonlinearity

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    5/42

    2.1 One-Dimensional Shear Wave Propagation Theory

    Consider a shear column with unit cross-section area,and it has Gof shear modulus and of mass density.

    z

    G.L

    G Soil

    Shear column

    The positive z is taken as downward direction.

    z

    dzz

    +

    2

    2

    t

    udz

    u dz

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    6/42

    (1) Equation of Motion

    Shear stress is expressedby

    G: Shear modulus

    z

    u

    : Shear strain

    where,

    )1(0dzt

    udz

    z 2

    2

    =

    +

    )2(zt

    u2

    2

    =

    )3(z

    uG

    =

    Consider the dynamic equilibrium of a small element,

    z

    dzz

    +

    2

    2

    t

    udz

    u dz

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    7/42

    Putting Eq.(3) into Eq.(2)

    leads to

    Eq.(4) is an equation of motion for one-dimensionalshear wave propagation.

    )4(z

    u

    Gt

    u2

    2

    2

    2

    =

    z

    dzz

    +

    2

    2

    t

    u

    dz

    u dz

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    8/42

    (2) General solution in time domain

    The velocity VS of shear wave (S-wave) is expressed by:

    Using VS, Eq.(4) can be transferred to:

    The general solution of Eq.(6) is given by:

    where, E(t+z/VS) and F(t-z/VS) are arbitrary functions in

    terms of t and z.

    )5(/GVS =

    )6(z

    u

    Vt

    u2

    22

    S2

    2

    =

    )7(VztF

    VztE)z,t(u

    SS

    +

    +=

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    9/42

    E(t+z/VS) indicates the

    displacement due to abackward propagatingwave which propagates inthe negative z direction.

    It is called "upward wave".

    while F(t-z/VS) due to aforward propagating wavepropagating in the

    positive zdirection.

    It is called "downwardwave".

    z

    xE

    F

    Characters E & F areconventionally used toexpress the "upward &downward" waves in the 1-

    D wave propagation."2E" is used as a jargon toexpress motions on

    outcropped bedrock, aswill be discussed later.

    z=0

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    10/42

    (3) Free surface condition

    The simplest, but most important, boundary conditionis free surface condition of the ground.

    Let z=0 ground surface, free surface condition is givenby,

    )8(0)0z(z

    uG)0z( ==

    ==

    From Eq.(7), shear stress is expressed by,

    )9(VztF

    VztE

    V1

    z)z,t(u

    SSS

    +=

    &&

    where dot express first derivative with respect to time.

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    11/42

    From Eqs.(8) and (9), assuming initial condition is zero,

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) )10(tFtEtFtE == &&

    Then, Eq.(7) yields

    )11(V

    ztE

    V

    ztE)z,t(u

    SS

    +

    +=

    On ground surface, putting z=0 into Eq.(11), one canobtain,

    ( ) ( ))12()t(E2tEtE)0,t(u =+=

    Ground motion on surface is twice as verticallyincident wave.

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    12/42

    This is a case where S-wave vertically impinges at thebottom of homogeneous half-space. Maximum amplitudeof upward wave is 0.5. Maximum amplitude of the groundmotion on surface becomes 1.0, as we learned.

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    13/42

    Consider the wavepropagation in twosemi-infinite media

    as shown in thefigure.

    When the wave E2(t+z/VS2) propagates upward and

    impinges on the interface (z=0) between two media, theincident wave is transformed into the transmission waveE1(t+z/VS1) in medium 1 and the reflection wave F2(t-z/VS2)

    in medium 2. Notice that downward wave does not exist inmedium 1.

    (4) Transmission and Reflection at Interface

    z

    : Transmission Wave

    : Incident Wave : Reflection wave

    G1 1

    G2 2

    Medium 1

    Medium 2z=0

    )V/zt(E 1S1 +

    )V/zt(E 2S2 + )V/zt(F 2S2

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    14/42

    )13(VztE)z,t(u

    1S

    11

    +=

    The displacement and shear stress in medium 1:

    z 2,VS2

    1(z,t) u1(z,t)E1(t+z/VS1)

    1,VS1Medium 1

    Medium 2

    )14(V

    ztE

    V

    G

    V

    ztE

    z

    G

    z

    )z,t(uG)z,t(

    1S

    1

    1S

    1

    1S

    11

    111

    +=

    +

    =

    =

    &

    1S1

    1S

    2

    1S1

    1S

    1 V

    V

    V

    V

    G=

    =

    Considering that

    Eq.(14) yields

    )15(V

    ztEV)z,t(

    1S

    11S11

    += &

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    15/42

    Similarly, for medium 2:

    z

    2,VS2

    2(z,t) u2(z,t)

    E2(t+z/VS2) F2(t-z/VS2)

    1,VS1Medium 1

    Medium 2

    )16(VztF

    VztE)z,t(u

    2S

    2

    2S

    22

    +

    +=

    )17(V

    z

    tFVV

    z

    tEV)z,t( 2S22S2

    2S22S22

    +=&&

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    16/42

    At the interface(z=0), displacement and stress must beconsistent, resulting in following boundary consition;

    z

    2,VS2

    2(z=0,t) u2(z,t)

    E2(t+z/VS2) F2(t-z/VS2)

    1,VS1E1(t+z/VS1)

    1(z=0,t) u1(z,t)

    Medium 1

    Medium 2

    )18()0,t(u)0,t(u 21 =

    )19()0,t()0,t( 21 =

    ( ) ( ) ( ) )20(tEtFtE 122 =+

    Substituting Eqs.(13), (15) ,(16) and (17) into Eqs.(18) and(19), following relationships

    can be obtained;

    ( ) ( ) ( )tEtFtE 122&&&

    =( ) ( ) ( ) )21(tEtFtE 122 =

    2S2

    1S1

    V

    V

    =where is impedance ratio

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    17/42

    Amplitudes of transmission and reflection waves can beexpressed in terms of incident wave.

    ( ) ( ) )22(tE1

    2tE 21 +

    =

    ( ) ( ) )23(tE1

    1tF 22 +

    =

    from (20)+(21)

    from(20)-(21)

    Define the transmission Tand reflection coefficient Ras:

    Transmission coefficient :

    Reflection coefficient )25(1

    1R

    )24(1

    2T

    +

    =

    +=

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    18/42

    Using Tand R, the transmission wave E1(t+z/VS1) andthe reflection wave F2(t-z/VS2) are given by:

    )27()V

    zt(E)(R)

    V

    zt(F

    )26()Vzt(E)(T)

    Vzt(E

    2S

    2

    2S

    2

    2S

    2

    1S

    1

    +=

    +=+

    z

    2,VS2

    E2(t+z/VS2)

    F2(t-z/VS2) =R() E2(t+z/VS2)

    1,VS1E1(t+z/VS1)=T() E2(t+z/VS2)

    =1VS1/2VS2

    Medium 1

    Medium 2

    -1.0

    -0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

    T R

    stiffsoft softstiff

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    19/42

    This is a case where S-wave vertically impinges at thebottom of a layer built on its half-space. Impedance ratio

    is 0.5. Maximum amplitude of upward S wave is 0.5.

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    20/42

    QUESTIONS

    Q1. Find max. amplitude of transmitted wave in surface layer.Q2. Find max. amplitude of reflected wave in bottom layer.

    Q3. Find max. amplitude of ground motion on surface.

    Q4. Find max. amplitude of transmitted wave to the lowerhalf-space when the reflected wave from ground surfaceimpinges on boundary.

    Q5. Find max. amplitude of reflected wave to the surfacelayer when the reflected wave from ground surface impingeson boundary.

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    21/42

    QUESTIONS

    Q1. Find max. amplitude of transmitted wave in surface layer.Q2. Find max. amplitude of reflected wave in bottom layer.

    Q3. Find max. amplitude of ground motion on surface.

    Q4. Find max. amplitude of transmitted wave to the lowerhalf-space when the reflected wave from ground surfaceimpinges on boundary.

    Q5. Find max. amplitude of reflected wave to the surfacelayer when the reflected wave from ground surface impingeson boundary.

    3

    1

    5.01

    5.01

    1

    1R

    3

    4

    5.01

    2

    1

    2T

    1

    1

    =+

    =+

    =

    =+

    =+

    =

    3

    42T5.0:3Q

    6

    1R5.0:2Q

    3

    2T5.0:1Q

    1

    1

    1

    =

    =

    =

    3

    1

    21

    21

    1

    1R

    3

    2

    21

    2

    1

    2T

    2

    2

    =+

    =+

    =

    =+

    =+

    =

    9

    2

    )3

    1

    (3

    2

    RT5.0:5Q

    9

    4

    3

    2

    3

    2

    TT5.0:4Q

    21

    21

    ==

    ==

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    22/42

    (5) General solution in Frequency Domain

    The equation of the motion is given by Eq.(6):

    Putting:

    in which denotes circular frequency(rad./sec).

    )6(z

    uV

    t

    u2

    22

    S2

    2

    =

    )28(e)z(U)t,z(u ti=

    Substituting Eq.(28) into Eq.(6) and deleting exponentialterm, following Helmholtz equation can be obtained;

    )29(0z

    )z(UV)z(U2

    22

    S

    2 =

    )30(0)z(UVz

    )z(U

    2S

    2

    2

    2

    =

    +

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    23/42

    where,

    SV

    k

    = is wave number(rad.s/m) and transformed as,

    SSSS

    2

    TV

    2

    V

    f2

    Vk

    =

    =

    =

    =

    where, f is frequency(Hz), S is wave length(m).

    The solution of Eq.(30) :

    is given by:

    where Eand Fare arbitrary constants.

    )30(0)z(UVz

    )z(U2

    S

    2

    2

    2

    =+

    )31(FeEe)z(Uz

    Viz

    Vi

    SS

    +=

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    24/42

    Substituting Eq.(31) into Eq.(28):

    the displacement u(z,t) can be expressed by:

    The first term indicates the wave propagating in thenegative zdirection, while the second term in the positivez direction. Eand Fexpress the amplitude of the waves.

    Hereafter, the time term eit is not written.

    )32(FeEe)t,z(u SSV

    zti

    V

    zti

    +

    +=

    The shear stress T(z) in frequency domain is expressed by:

    )33(FeEeVi

    FeEeV

    i

    dz

    )z(dU

    )z(T

    zV

    izV

    i

    S

    zV

    izV

    i

    S

    SS

    SS

    =

    ==

    )28(e)z(U)t,z(u ti=

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    25/42

    z

    x

    E

    F

    As we already discussed,

    characters E & F are usedto express the "upward &downward" waves in the 1-D wave propagation.

    It is easy to understandconsidering form of Eq.(32).

    z=0

    )32(FeEe)t,z(u SSV

    ztiV

    zti

    + +=

    Free surface condition E=F and transmission andreflection at interface between two media are similar tothe time domain case, as previously discussed.

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    26/42

    Substituting free surface condition E=F into Eq.(32)

    yields, considering Euler's formula ,

    )34(z

    2cosE2zV

    f2cosE2z

    VcosE2

    eeEEeEe)z(U

    SSS

    zV

    izV

    izV

    izV

    iSSSS

    =

    =

    =

    +=+=

    Again, S is S-wave length(m).At z=S/4, amplitude is equal to zero. This is the firstnodal point for harmonic incident S-wave. Nodal pointsunder surface can be also seen at,

    )35(),3,2,1,0n()1n2(

    4

    z S L=+

    =

    =

    sinicosei

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    27/42

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    28/42

    We consider the SH wave propagation in a surfacestratum on the engineering bedrock, when the SH wavewith amplitude E

    O

    incidents.

    (6) Amplification of a surface stratum

    on the engineering bedrock

    zEO(t): Incident Wave

    G1 1 V1

    G2 2 V2

    G.L

    H

    Surface Stratum

    Engineering Bedrock

    1S11 V,,G

    2S22 V,,G

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    29/42

    Consider the wave propagation in two layered strata asshown, when the SH wave with amplitude Eo incidents onthe interface between the surface stratum and theengineering bedrock.

    z1

    z2

    H

    E1 exp(i k1t)

    F1 exp(-i k1t)

    Eo exp(i k2t) : Incident Wave

    F2 exp(-i k2t)

    G.L

    G1

    1

    1

    G2 2 2

    Surface Stratum

    Engineering Bedrock

    1S11 V,,G

    2S22 V,,G

    )tV

    iexp(F1S

    1

    )tV

    iexp(E1S

    1

    )tV

    iexp(E

    2S

    0

    )tV

    iexp(F2S

    2

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    30/42

    The displacement and shear stress in both strata are givenby:

    (1) for the surface stratum:

    (2) for the engineering bedrock:

    The subscripts 1 and 2 indicate the surface stratum and

    the engineering bedrock, respectively. (except E0)

    )36(eFeE)z(U1

    1S1

    1S

    zV

    i

    1

    zV

    i

    111

    +=

    )37(eFeEVi)z(T1

    1S1

    1S

    zV

    i

    1

    zV

    i

    11S111

    =

    )38(eFeE)z(U2

    2S2

    2S

    zV

    i

    2

    zV

    i

    022

    +=

    )39(eFeEVi)z(T

    22S

    22S

    zV

    i

    2

    zV

    i

    02S222

    =

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    31/42

    Therefore, the displacement and the

    shear stress in the surface stratumare:

    The shear stress at the groundsurface (z1=0) becomes zero.

    G.L

    Surface Stratum

    Engineering Bedrock

    Z1

    Z2

    1(z1=0) = 0

    ( ) 0FEVi)0z(T 111S111 ===

    )40(FE11

    =

    )41(eeEeEeE)z(U1

    1S

    1

    1S

    1

    1S

    1

    1S

    z

    V

    iz

    V

    i

    1

    z

    V

    i

    1

    z

    V

    i

    111

    +=+=

    )42(eeEVieEeEVi)z(T1

    1S1

    1S1

    1S1

    1S

    zV

    izV

    i

    11S1

    zV

    i

    1

    zV

    i

    11S111

    =

    =

    G LThe boundary conditions are

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    32/42

    G.L

    Surface Stratum

    Engineering Bedrock

    Z1

    Z2

    2(z2=0) = 1(z1=H)

    u2(z2=0) = u1(z1=H)

    H

    The boundary conditions aregiven at the interface between

    the surface stratum and theengineering bedrock.

    Substituting Eq.(41) and Eq.(42)into Eq.(43):

    Putting Eq.(41) and Eq.(42) intoEq.(44):

    )43()Hz(U)0z(U 1122 ===

    )44()Hz(T)0z(T 1122 ===

    )45(eeEFE

    HV

    iHV

    i

    120

    1S1S

    +=+

    ( ) )46(eeEViFEViH

    ViH

    Vi

    11S1202S21S1S

    =

    )47(eeEFEH

    ViH

    Vi

    1201S1S

    =

    2S2

    1S1V

    V

    =where is impedance ratio

    HiHi

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    33/42

    Eq.(45) :

    plus Eq.(47) :

    leads to,

    )47(eeEFE HViHVi1201S1S

    =

    ++=

    H

    V

    iH

    V

    i

    101S1S e)1(e)1(EE2

    )45(eeEFEH

    ViH

    Vi

    1201S1S

    +=+

    )48(

    )ee()ee(

    E2

    e)1(e)1(

    E2E

    H

    V

    iH

    V

    iH

    V

    iH

    V

    i

    0

    H

    V

    iH

    V

    i

    01

    1S1S1S1S1S1S

    ++

    =

    ++

    =

    Similarly, Eq.(45) minus Eq.(47) yields :

    )49(E

    )ee()ee(

    )ee()ee(F 0

    HV

    iHV

    iHV

    iHV

    i

    HViHViHViHVi

    2

    1S1S1S1S

    1S1S1S1S

    ++

    +++=

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    34/42

    The displacement US on ground surface is

    G.L

    Surface Stratum

    Engineering Bedrock

    Z1

    Z2

    US = u1(z1=0)

    H

    EO

    )50(

    )ee()ee(

    E4E2)0z(UU

    HV

    iHV

    iHV

    iHV

    i

    0

    111S

    1S1S1S1S

    ++

    ====

    = sinicose iPutting Euler's formula

    into Eq.(50) yields;

    )51(

    )HV

    sin(i)HV

    cos(

    E2U

    1S1S

    0S

    +

    =

    Ratio of US to 2E0 is expressed by;

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    35/42

    EO

    2EO

    Engineering Bedrock

    Outcrop

    of Engineering Bedrock

    2EO is the displacement of the

    engineering bedrock, when thesurface stratum is removed and theengineering bedrock is in outcrop.

    Absolute value of transfer function US/(2EO) is:

    )53(

    )HV(sin)HV(cos

    1

    E2

    U

    1S

    22

    1S

    20

    S

    +

    =

    )52()H

    Vsin(i)H

    Vcos(

    1

    E2

    U

    1S1S

    0

    S

    +=

    Ratio of US to 2E0 is expressed by;

    This expression is known as

    transfer function.

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    36/42

    Similarly, the displacementat the interface is given by:

    G.L

    Surface Stratum

    Engineering Bedrock

    Z1

    Z2

    UB = u2(z2=0)

    = u1(z1=H)

    H

    EO

    Absolute value of UB/(2EO) is:

    )54(

    )HV

    tan(i1

    E2

    )HV

    sin(i)HV

    cos(

    )HV

    cos(E2

    EE)0z(UU

    1S

    0

    1S1S

    1S

    0

    2022B

    +

    =

    +

    =

    +===

    )55(

    )H

    V

    (tan1

    1

    E2

    U

    1S

    220

    B

    +

    =

    G

    US

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    37/42

    G.L

    Surface Stratum

    Engineering Bedrock

    Z1

    Z2

    UB

    H

    EO

    The ratio of US to UB is :

    )56(

    )HV

    cos(

    1

    )H

    V

    sin(i)H

    V

    cos(

    )HV

    sin(i)HV

    cos(

    )H

    V

    cos(

    1

    )HV

    sin(i)HV

    cos(

    )HV

    tan(i1

    U

    U

    1S

    1S1S

    1S1S

    1S

    1S1S

    1S

    B

    S

    =

    +

    +

    =

    +

    +=

    Notice that transfer function US/UB is determined only by

    VS1,H, and irrelevant with soil properties in engineeringbedrock.

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    38/42

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    0 1 2 3 4

    =0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.4

    0.2

    0.6

    H/V1

    x(/2)

    Dotted Line : Abs.US/(2EO)

    Abs.UB/(2EO)

    Solid Line : Abs.US/(2EO)

    Abs.US/(2EO)

    Abs.(US/2EO) and Abs.(UB/2EO)

    Th fi l

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    39/42

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    0 1 2 3 4

    =0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.4

    0.2

    0.6

    H/V1

    x(/2)

    Dotted Line : Abs.US/(2EO)

    Abs.UB/(2EO)

    Solid Line : Abs.US/(2EO)

    Abs.US/(2EO)

    1 2

    The second naturalcircular frequency:

    2=3 1

    The first naturalcircular frequency:

    1H/VS1=/2 1=(/2)(VS1/H)

    Th fi l i d T

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    40/42

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    0 1 2 3 4

    =0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.4

    0.2

    0.6

    H/V1

    x(/2)

    Dotted Line : Abs.US/(2EO)

    Abs.UB/(2EO)

    Solid Line : Abs.US/(2EO)

    Abs.US/(2EO)

    1 2The second natural period T2 and frequency f2:

    T2= T1/3 f2= 3f1

    The first natural period T1and frequency f1:

    T1=2/ 1=(4H)/ VS1f1=1/ T1=VS1/(4H)

    These formulas arefrequently used and are

    good to memorized.

    I E (53) Ab l t

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    41/42

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    0 1 2 3 4

    =0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.4

    0.2

    0.6

    H/V1

    x(/2)

    Dotted Line : Abs.US/(2EO)

    Abs.UB/(2EO)

    Solid Line : Abs.US/(2EO)

    Abs.US/(2EO)

    1 2

    max. Us/2Eo

    The amplitude ratio atthe resonant frequency

    is given by,

    1/When the impedance ratio is smaller, theamplification at the natural

    frequency becomes larger.

    That is, when the surface stratum is much softer than theengineering bedrock, the amplification becomes much

    larger.

    In Eq.(53), Absolutevalue of transfer

    function US/(2EO),

  • 8/2/2019 Dynamic soil structure interaction_02_Chapter2_nagano

    42/42

    E N DAll animation files are available at

    http://www.rs.noda.tus.ac.jp/nagano-l/ssi.html